Codex @codex  0

Write the uniform surface charge density on the annulus as $\sigma =Q/[\pi (b^2-a^2)]$, and let $x$ be signed distance along its axis. A ring of radius $r$ and width $dr$ contains electric charge $dq=2\pi \sigma rdr$. Its transverse electric field components cancel in pairs, and its electric potential is $dV=dq/[4\pi {ϵ}_0\sqrt{x^2+r^2}]$. Setting $V(\infty )=0$ and integrating gives the axial field of a uniformly charged annulus:At $x=0$, each element's electric field cancels that of the diametrically opposite element, so $\mathbf{E}=0$. There is no surface charge at the centre because $a>0$; the axis electric field is continuous there.

For positive $Q$ and $x>0$, differentiate the signed axial electric field:Its stationary condition is $a^{4/3}(x^2+b^2)=b^{4/3}(x^2+a^2)$. Factoring with $A=a^{2/3}$ and $B=b^{2/3}$ givesThe derivative starts positive, has exactly one positive zero and is negative at large $x$, so this is the positive-side maximum. For either sign of $Q$, the electric field magnitude has equal maxima at $x=\pm x_{\max }$. As $b\to a$, the thin-ring limit is $x_{\max }\to a/\sqrt{2}$.

Let $m$ be the sliding point charge's mass. Expanding the axial field of a uniformly charged annulus for $|x|\ll a,b$ givesIts electric charge is $-Q$, so its electric force points toward the centre. Newton's second law becomesTo leading order this is simple harmonic motion, withThe mass is an additional parameter, since the source supplies no numerical value. The constraint is essential: stability along the axis does not imply unconstrained three-dimensional trapping by a static electric field.

The method of images replaces a conductor's induced surface charge by suitable fictitious image charges located outside the physical region in which the electric field is sought. Choose them so that the combined electric potential satisfies the specified conductor boundary values, has the required behaviour at infinity, and has the correct physical sources. The uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential then identifies this constructed electric potential with the physical solution in that region.

For an infinite grounded conducting plane at $z=0$, a point charge $q$ at $(x,y,z)$ with $z>0$ has an image charge $-q$ at $(x,y,-z)$. Distances to the pair are equal on the plane, so their electric potentials cancel there. This construction determines the electric field above the plane; below it the actual conductor has constant electric potential and zero electric field, rather than the fictitious image's continuation.

Use the electric dipole above a grounded conducting plane approximation, valid for $d\ll a$. Let $\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ point upward, and choose $\mathbf{p}=p(\sin \theta \hat{\mathbf{x}}+\cos \theta \hat{\mathbf{z}})$. Reflecting the two constituent point charges and reversing their signs produces an image electric dipole momentat height $-a$. Thus the parallel electric dipole moment reverses and the normal one is unchanged. At the real electric dipole, the separation from its image is $2a\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, giving the image electric fieldThe physical torque is $\mathbf{\tau }=\mathbf{p}\times {\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{im}}$, soFor $0<\theta <\pi /2$, its direction reduces $\theta$, tending to align the electric dipole with the upward normal. In general it favours either normal orientation; a perfectly parallel orientation has zero torque but is unstable to tilting.

The conductor-response potential energy includes one half of the real-image interaction:This factor accounts for the induced surface charge changing as the physical source is assembled. Differentiation with respect to height at fixed orientation givesThere is no horizontal force, since translating the entire arrangement parallel to the plane leaves $U$ unchanged. For example, the normal and parallel orientations give respective downward force magnitudes $3p^2/(32\pi {ϵ}_0{a}^4)$ and $3p^2/(64\pi {ϵ}_0{a}^4)$.

A single physical point charge induces total plane electric charge $-q$. One can verify this by integrating its induced surface charge density, $-qh/[2\pi ({\varrho }^2+h^2{)}^{3/2}]$, over the plane. The two physical electric charges therefore induce opposite totals, givingThe local surface charge density is generally nonzero. The zero total holds for the finite neutral pair as well as its ideal electric dipole limit.

The electric field of a signed point electric charge in vacuum follows Coulomb's law:For the conducting plane, the method of images replaces each charge $Q_j$ at height $h_j$ by an image charge $-Q_j$ at height $-h_j$. The real and image electric fields have cancelling tangential components and equal normal components at the surface. Thus the electric field at a conducting plane from axial point charges, just above the point directly below them, isNumerically,The surface value means the air-side limit. Inside the ideal conductor the electrostatic electric field is zero; its discontinuity across the surface is supported by induced surface charge. Omitting the image charges would give half the external answer.

The grounded outer cylinder fixes $\Phi (a)=0$. Integrating the annular electric field inward givesEquivalently, the coaxial cylindrical capacitor has $C_{\mathrm{cyl}}=2\pi {ϵ}_{0}l/\log (a/b)$ and carries charge $Q=4\pi {ϵ}_{0}RV$, so $\Phi (b)=Q/C_{\mathrm{cyl}}$. The original sphere potential $V$ is used to infer its conserved charge; it is not the final potential of the sphere or of the inner cylinder.

For $b<r<a$, a coaxial Gauss surface of length $l$ encloses net charge $Q$: the sphere and the cavity-wall charge cancel, leaving $+Q$ on the outside of the inner conductor. In the long-cylinder approximation,The electric field points radially outward for $V>0$. End effects and axial nonuniformity near the openings are excluded by the ideal coaxial cylindrical capacitor approximation.

The method of images replaces electrical conductors by fictitious image charges outside the physical region. Choose the image charges so that the physical electric charges and their images produce the prescribed constant electric potential on every conducting boundary. The uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential then identifies this constructed electric potential with the physical solution in the charge-containing region. Several conducting planes can require several, or infinitely many, image charges; a single reflected image is sufficient for one infinite plane.

Put the plane at $z=0$ and the point charge at $(0,0,d)$. For $z>0$, use an image charge $-q$ at $(0,0,-d)$:This vanishes on the plane. An arbitrary constant can be added if a different reference electric potential is chosen. Excluding the point charge's own electric field, Coulomb's law givesThe separation from the image charge is $2d$, and the force is attractive for either sign of $q$. No imposed external electric field is included.

At electrostatic equilibrium the electric field in the metal is zero. The empty cavity also has zero electric field, by the uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential. The electric charge lies on the outer surface. For the isolated conducting sphere, spherical symmetry and Gauss's law giveTaking the electric potential to vanish at infinity and using $E_r=-d\varphi /dr$ givesThe electric potential is continuous at the surface, while the normal electric field jumps by $\sigma /{ϵ}_0$, with surface charge density $\sigma =Q/(4\pi R^2)$.

This is a plane electromagnetic wave with linear polarization. $\mathbf{E}$ is the electric field; $E_0$ its peak amplitude; $x$ the position along propagation; $t$ the time; $k=2\pi /\lambda$ the wavenumber; and $\omega =2\pi f$ the angular frequency. Here $\lambda$ is the wavelength, $f$ the frequency, and $\hat{\mathbf{y}}$ the unit vector in the direction of the electric field. Constant phase $kx-\omega t$ moves along $+x$ with phase velocity $\omega /k$.

Put $\theta =kx-\omega t$. The differential Faraday's law of induction givesThe accompanying oscillating magnetic field, excluding any independent static background, is therefore $\mathbf{B}=(k/\omega )E_0\cos \theta \hat{\mathbf{z}}$. To determine the propagation speed, also use the source-free Ampere-Maxwell law:ThusThe electric field and magnetic field oscillate in phase, perpendicular to one another and to propagation; $\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B}$ points along $+x$.

For the negative test electric charge, use the same change in the fixed point charge's electric potential:The external agent extracts energy, since the final Coulomb potential energy is lower. Again the path must avoid the fixed point charge, and the work done by the electric field is $-W_{-}$.

The fixed point charge produces electric potential $\varphi (r)=k_{e}q/r$, where $k_e=1/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$. The external quasistatic work is the increase in Coulomb potential energy:The endpoints have radii $2d$ and $d$, irrespective of their opposite coordinate signs. One must use a path avoiding the singular point charge at the origin. The electric field is conservative on such paths, so the endpoint calculation suffices; a literal straight path through the origin is inadmissible. The work done by the electric field has the opposite sign.

The electric dipole moment is $\mathbf{p}=qa\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. Write $\theta$ for the angle measured from $+y$, with $\hat{\mathbf{\theta }}$ pointing toward increasing $\theta$. The exact electric potential isFor $r\gg a$, expand the reciprocals to first order in $a/r$. Their common $1/r$ terms cancel, giving the electric dipole approximationThe radial electric field follows from $E_r=-\partial \varphi /\partial r$, and the tangential electric field from $E_{\theta }=-(1/r)\partial \varphi /\partial \theta$. The omitted terms are of relative order $a^2/r^2$ away from zeros of a component. Multiplying by the test electric charge gives the force componentsThe electric field lines emerge from the positive electric charge and terminate on the negative electric charge. They are mirror-symmetric about the electric dipole axis and bow out across its equatorial plane. In the point-electric dipole limit their meridional curves obey $dr/(rd\theta )=E_r/E_{\theta }=2\cot \theta$, hence $r=C{\sin }^2\theta$.

Interpret the coordinates as a plane in ordinary three-dimensional electrostatics. Set $k_e=1/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$, where ${ϵ}_0$ is the vacuum permittivity. The work required to bring the second point charge in quasistatically is its electric charge times the first charge's electric potential:The individual point-charge self-energies are excluded; this is the electrostatic potential energy of point charges relative to infinite separation.

By the superposition principle, for $\mathbf{r}=(x,y)$ and $\mathbf{d}=(d,0)$ the electric field isAt the first position both contributions point toward positive $x$, whereas at the second they oppose one another. ThusAt $(d/2,d)$ the two distances are $\sqrt{5}d/2$. The vertical electric field components cancel and the horizontal components add:Dimensional convention. The source's description of space as two-dimensional cannot literally mean two-dimensional electrostatics with the same inverse-square formula. In a genuinely two-dimensional Gauss's law, the circumference grows as $r$, giving an electric field proportional to $1/r$ and a logarithmic electric potential. For example, integrating $1/r$ from $d$ to infinity diverges, so the same finite reference potential energy at infinite separation does not exist. The displayed results use the conventional three-dimensional Coulomb's law restricted to the stated plane.

For this space-charge-filled parallel-plate capacitor, place the first plate at $x=0$ and the second at $x=d=x_o$, ignoring fringing field of a capacitor. With vacuum permittivity between the plates and fixed charge density $\rho$, Poisson's equation and the prescribed boundary electric potentials giveIntegrating twice and imposing both values yieldsThe electric field is minus the gradient of the electric potential, henceThus the electric potential is a parabola, concave downward for $\rho >0$ and upward for $\rho <0$. The signed electric field is a straight line. Its magnitude has a V-shaped corner if its zerolies inside the gap; otherwise its magnitude is a single straight segment. An interior zero requires $|V_1-V_2|<|\rho |d^2/(2{ϵ}_0)$. At that point the electric potential has its interior extremum. For $\rho =0$, these reduce to a linear electric potential and a uniform electric field.

In SI units, Maxwell's equations in vacuum, allowing charge density $\rho$ and electric current density $\mathbf{J}$, areThe source-free specialization sets $\rho =0$ and $\mathbf{J}=0$; it cannot describe the charged objects at their locations. Applying the divergence theorem to the first equation gives Gauss's law:For an isolated point charge $q_1$, spherical symmetry makes the electric field radial and constant in magnitude on a concentric sphere. Therefore $4\pi r^2{E}_r=q_1/{ϵ}_0$. Multiplying by a second point charge gives Coulomb's law,The force points away from the first charge for like signs and toward it for opposite signs.

For the spherical capacitor, a Gaussian sphere between the shells encloses $q$, so $E_r=q/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^2)$ for $a<r<b$. Integrating the electric field inward from the outer shell yieldsAn arbitrary constant $V(b)$ remains unless a reference is specified. The capacitance is determined by the potential difference:For the subsequent charging operation, take the initial outer shell to be earthed, or interpret the stated $V$ as the inner-to-outer voltage with the outer reference zero. Isolating the inner shell fixes its electric charge at $q=CV$. Removing the outer shell leaves an isolated conducting sphere. Its electric field and electric potential, now with zero at infinity, areConsequentlyThese changes of electric potential are compatible with constant electric charge. Without the initial reference convention the absolute stated $V$ does not determine $q=CV$: for example, if the outer shell were initially isolated and neutral, the absolute inner electric potential would instead be $q/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}a)$.

Finally take the connected spheres to be sufficiently far apart that the long wire's capacitance and their mutual influence can be neglected. Their common electric potential requiresso $q_a=q/3$ and $q_{2a}=2q/3$. The magnitudes of the surface electric fields areThis is the usual widely separated-sphere approximation. A wire enforces an equipotential, but alone does not make this ratio exact for arbitrary arrangements. As a concrete counterexample, if the second shell enclosed the first concentrically and they were connected, all net electric charge would reside on the exterior and the inner sphere's surface electric field would be zero.

Faraday's law of induction states that the induced electromotive force around an oriented closed circuit equals the negative rate of change of linked magnetic flux. For a stationary circuit,Here $\mathbf{E}$ is electric field, $\mathbf{B}$ is magnetic flux density, and the oriented surface $A$ has the circuit as its boundary. For $N$ identical series turns, replace ${\Phi }_B$ by the total flux linkage $N{\Phi }_B$. Lenz's law supplies the sign: an induced electric current opposes the change of linked magnetic flux, in agreement with conservation of energy.

If the wire moves with local velocity $\mathbf{u}$, the more general electromotive force includes the magnetic Lorentz force per unit electric charge:The boundary and surface orientations in both expressions are related by the right-hand rule.

A large electrical conductor between the point charges provides electrostatic shielding: one must not retain their original mutual Coulomb force through an ideal infinite plate. In the usual broad-plate approximation, let $\sigma$ denote the unperturbed surface charge density on each face. The electrostatic boundary condition gives an outward electric field $E_0=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. Neglecting local electrostatic induction, the rod's tension then satisfies $mg\tan \varphi =Q{E}_0$, givingThere are two physical qualifications. First, if $\sigma$ means the total charge per projected plate area, shared equally between the two faces, then $E_0=\sigma /(2{ϵ}_0)$ and the same approximation gives $\varphi \simeq 0.989^{\circ }$. The factor of two is a convention about the specified surface charge density, not a different Gauss's law.

Second, a point charge near an electrical conductor makes its surface charge density nonuniform. For an infinite plane with prescribed background electric field $E_0$, the method of images adds an attractive force $k{Q}^2/(4x^2)$, where $x=l\sin \varphi$. The more accurate equilibrium equation isIts larger, stable root is approximately $1.96^{\circ }$ for the per-face convention, or $0.877^{\circ }$ for the total-area convention. This ideal-plane refinement is not an exact answer for an unspecified finite plate: its dimensions and the meaning of the quoted surface charge density would be needed. In particular, adding a uniform-sheet electric field to the original mutual repulsion would describe a different, nonshielding model.

In vacuum, Maxwell's equations in differential form areHere $\rho$ is charge density, $\mathbf{J}$ is electric current density, $\mathbf{E}$ is electric field, and $\mathbf{B}$ is magnetic flux density. In a source-free region, taking the curl of the third equation and using $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}$ gives the wave equationThe same argument gives the wave equation for $\mathbf{B}$. A concrete family satisfying all four Maxwell's equations isThe function $F$ may be any twice differentiable profile. These are transverse travelling waves; reverse the magnetic field direction for propagation in the opposite direction. Because the source-free Maxwell's equations are homogeneous linear differential equations, any finite linear combination of such paired electric fields and magnetic fields is again a solution. Infinite superpositions also work whenever the required derivatives converge. A solution of the component wave equations alone must still satisfy the divergence and mutual-curl constraints.

Neglect the entrance and exit capacitor fringing fields and use the coaxial electric field between the cylindrical plates. Let $U=V(R_1)-V(R_2)$, with $R_2>R_1$. The radial electric field isFor an electron, of electric charge $-e$, to follow the circular path $R=(R_1+R_2)/2$, its inward centripetal force must be $m_e{v}_0^2/R$. ThereforeThe inner plate must be at higher electric potential: the electric field points outward and the electron's electric force inward. The electric force is perpendicular to the velocity, so no work is done and the speed remains $v_0$. The required voltage is independent of the opening angle $\varphi$, which only sets the transit time $R\varphi /v_0$. For a narrow gap, $\ln (R_2/R_1)\simeq (R_2-R_1)/R$. This is a nonrelativistic, negligible-capacitor fringing field answer; finite open cylindrical sections do not have an exactly radial electric field at their ends.