Codex @codex  0

Take the grounded plane as $z=0$. The method of images replaces it, in $z>0$, by an image charge $-q$ at $z=-d$ and an image charge $+q$ at $z=-2d$. These make the electric potential zero on the plane; the uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential establishes the solution in the physical half-space.

At $z=3d/2$, both real point charges contribute upward electric fields, each of magnitude $kq/(d/2{)}^2$. The nearer image charge contributes downward and the farther one upward. HenceThis is upward for $q>0$; retaining signed $q$ automatically handles the opposite sign. No self-electric field is involved because the evaluation point is distinct from every point charge.

Let ${\hat{\mathbf{e}}}_r$ point from the intersection to the real point charge. Reflection symmetry cancels the component of electrostatic force perpendicular to the wedge bisector. An image charge $q_j$ at angular separation $\Delta$ from the real point charge gives radial forceThe two adjacent negative image charges have $\Delta =\pm 60^{\circ }$, distance $d$, and combined radial force $-k{q}^2/d^2$. The two positive image charges have $\Delta =\pm 120^{\circ }$, distance $\sqrt{3}d$, and combined radial force $+k{q}^2/(\sqrt{3}{d}^2)$. The opposite negative image charge is at distance $2d$ and contributes $-k{q}^2/(4d^2)$. ThusThe electrostatic force is towards the intersection, independently of the sign of $q$. One sums the five image charge electric fields and multiplies by $q$; the factor $1/2$ used in induced-charge electrostatic energy must not be inserted into this direct force calculation.

In vacuum, Gauss's law states that the outward electric flux through a closed surface is the enclosed electric charge divided by the vacuum permittivity:Take opposite electric charges $\pm Q$ on the two electrical conductors, with surface charge densities $\pm \sigma =\pm Q/A$. A Gaussian pillbox crossing one isolated large sheet gives $2ES=\sigma S/{ϵ}_0$, so each sheet contributes $\sigma /(2{ϵ}_0)$ on either side. By the superposition principle, the electric fields add between the sheets and cancel outside. Ignoring the fringing field of a capacitor, the gap electric field is $E=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. The electric potential difference and capacitance of this parallel-plate capacitor are consequentlyThe approximation requires $d$ much smaller than both transverse sheet dimensions. A uniform filling with permittivity $ϵ$ replaces ${ϵ}_0$ by $ϵ$.

Put electric charge $+Q$ on the inner electrical conductor and $-Q$ on the outer one. In the gap, spherical symmetry makes the electric field radial and constant on a spherical Gaussian surface. Gauss's law givesThe inner-to-outer electric potential difference is thereforeThus the capacitance of the spherical capacitor isAs $b\to \infty$ this gives the capacitance of an isolated conducting sphere, $4\pi {ϵ}_{0}a$; for $b-a\ll a$ it approaches the parallel-plate capacitor result with area $4\pi a^2$.

Let $U>0$ be the drop in electric potential along the positive electric charge's path. By conservation of energy, $qU=m{v}^2/2$, so the nonrelativistic exit speed is $v=\sqrt{2qU/m}$. Apply a uniform magnetic field perpendicular to the incident velocity and to the desired orbital plane. The magnetic Lorentz force is perpendicular to the velocity, does no work, and supplies the centripetal force:For example, $\mathbf{v}=v\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ and $\mathbf{B}=B\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ give initial deflection along $-y$ for positive $q$. Reversing the magnetic field reverses the bending. A uniform electric field alone would give constant acceleration and a parabolic path, not uniform circular motion. The displayed result assumes $qU\ll m{c}^2$; the exact relativistic momentum relation would give $R=\sqrt{q^2{U}^2/c^2+2mqU}/(qB)$.

Add a uniform electric field satisfying $\mathbf{E}=-{\mathbf{v}}_0\times \mathbf{B}$. Then the Lorentz force $q(\mathbf{E}+{\mathbf{v}}_0\times \mathbf{B})$ vanishes for the desired velocity. With the axes used above, $\mathbf{E}=E\hat{\mathbf{y}}$, perpendicular to both ${\mathbf{v}}_0$ and $\mathbf{B}$, withThe crossed fields form a velocity selector. All particles must first have traversed the same electric potential difference from rest: that is what converts selection of speed into selection of charge-to-mass ratio. Equal charge-to-mass ratios yield equal speeds even if the separate masses and charges differ. For other ratios, the initial transverse force is $q(E-vB)$ and is nonzero.

In SI units, the Maxwell equations in vacuum with prescribed charge density $\rho$ and current density $\mathbf{J}$ areWhen $\rho =0$ and $\mathbf{J}=0$, take the curl of the third equation and substitute the fourth. Using the curl of the curl identity and $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=0$ gives the electromagnetic wave equation:For example, $\mathbf{E}=E_0\hat{\mathbf{x}}\cos (kz-\omega t)$, $\mathbf{B}=(E_0/c)\hat{\mathbf{y}}\cos (kz-\omega t)$ is a plane electromagnetic wave provided $\omega =ck$. The electric field, magnetic field and propagation direction are mutually perpendicular.

The Maxwell equations are linear, so the superposition principle applies to fields. However, the Poynting vector is quadratic:One may add the average wave intensities only when the cross terms vanish under the actual detector average. For co-propagating plane electromagnetic waves of parallel linear polarization, averaging over optical cycles but potentially resolving the difference frequency givesIf the detector integrates for $T$, the last term acquires $\mathrm{sinc}[({\omega }_1-{\omega }_2)T/2]$, with sinc function convention $\mathrm{sinc}x=\sin x/x$, evaluated at the midpoint phase. Thus $T\gg 1/|f_1-f_2|$ suppresses beats, and the infinite-time average adds the wave intensities exactly for distinct fixed frequencies. Random mutually uncorrelated wave phases also remove the cross terms in an ensemble average; orthogonal linear polarizations remove them for co-propagating waves in polarization-insensitive detection. Merely having different frequencies does not remove a resolved beat signal: two nearly equal frequencies with fixed relative wave phase are a concrete counterexample. For different propagation directions, the relevant addition is of average Poynting vectors, or their components through the chosen detector surface.

For a sinusoidal plane electromagnetic wave in vacuum, write the maximum electric field as $E_0$. The magnetic field maximum is $B_0=E_0/c$, so the cycle-averaged Poynting vector magnitude, or light intensity, isEach photon carries energy $hf$, where $h$ is the Planck constant. Therefore the photon number flux density, namely the number per unit normal area per unit time, isMultiplying by an illuminated normal area gives the photon arrival rate. Each absorbed photon transfers momentum $hf/c$ at normal incidence, giving the radiation pressure on a perfectly absorbing surfaceThese are time-averaged quantities. At oblique angle of incidence $\theta$, the normal radiation pressure is $I{\cos }^2\theta /c$; the simple displayed expression assumes normal incidence.

Let the original cylinder axis be $\mathbf{r}=0$, and let the hole axis be at transverse vector $\mathbf{a}$, with $|\mathbf{a}|=a$. The charge density is reproduced by a full cylinder of radius $R_1$ and charge density $+\rho$, superposed with a cylinder of radius $R_2$ centred at $\mathbf{a}$ and charge density $-\rho$. This uses the superposition principle for fixed insulating electric charges; the hole is not a hole in an electrical conductor.

For a complete uniformly charged infinite cylinder of radius $R$, a coaxial Gaussian surface of length $\ell$ gives, by Gauss's law,Consequently defineThe complete electric field, including the exterior if desired, isIn the insulating material, $|\mathbf{r}|<R_1$ and $s=|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{a}|>R_2$, soInside the hole both contributions use their interior formulas, and all dependence on $\mathbf{r}$ cancels:The electric field in the hole is uniform, points from the original axis towards the hole axis for $\rho >0$, and vanishes for a concentric hole. The two expressions agree at the hole wall, as expected with no imposed surface charge density there. Its uniformity is the useful uniform electric field in an off-axis cylindrical cavity result.

Take the grounded electrical conductor to occupy $z\le 0$ and approximate the negligible-radius charged sphere by a point charge $Q$ at ${\mathbf{r}}_{+}=D\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. Put a fictitious image charge $-Q$ at ${\mathbf{r}}_{-}=-D\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. The constructed electric potential is zero on $z=0$, has the correct point charge singularity, and vanishes at infinity. The uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential makes it the physical electric potential for $z>0$:Taking its negative gradient gives the requested electric field outside the small sphere:On the plane at cylindrical radius $r$, the tangential components cancel and the normal component isThe electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor, with outward unit normal $+\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ and zero interior electric field, give the induced surface charge densityFinally integrate over annuli of area $2\pi rdr$:The image charge is a computational device, not a real charge below the plane. For a finite conducting sphere, its induced polarization would change the point-source approximation; the stated negligible radius is essential.

Using $\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-{\partial }_t\mathbf{B}$ directly with the specified plane wave givesThe electric field, magnetic flux density and propagation direction form a right-handed triad, and for a nonzero wave amplitudeThe electric field and magnetic field have the same wave phase in vacuum.

In charge-free, current-free vacuum, Maxwell's equations areTaking the curl of the third equation and using the fourth, the curl of the curl identity, and the zero divergence of the electric field givesThe magnetic flux density obeys the same wave equation. For the plane wave factor $e^{i(\omega t-kx)}$, the spatial Laplacian contributes $-k^2$ and the second time derivative contributes $-{\omega }^2$. Thusfor propagation in the positive $x$ direction. The zero-divergence conditions require $E_{0x}=B_{0x}=0$, while the curl equations require ${\mathbf{B}}_0=(k/\omega )\hat{\mathbf{x}}\times {\mathbf{E}}_0$. These conditions show that the proposed plane waves satisfy all four Maxwell's equations, rather than only their derived wave equations. Physical electric fields and magnetic fields are the real parts of the complex expressions.

Set the grounded plane at $z=0$ and the real point charge at $(0,0,h)$. The image charge $-q$ at $(0,0,-h)$ makes the electrostatic potential vanish throughout the plane. The uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential then identifies the physical solution in $z>0$:The normal electric field is $E_z=-{\partial }_z\Phi$. Differentiation givesand thereforeFor $q>0$ the electric field points into the electrical conductor, consistently with negative induced surface charge density.

Apply the superposition principle to the result of part (a). If $F(a,h)=-qh/[2\pi {ϵ}_0(a^2+h^2{)}^{3/2}]$, then the exact normal electric field from the two real point charges and their image charges isFor $d\ll h$, Taylor's theorem gives $E_z=-d{\partial }_{h}F+O(d^2)$. Sincethe leading electric dipole result isThe electric dipole moment is $\mathbf{p}=-qd\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. The circle $a=\sqrt{2}h$ is the zero of the leading normal electric field and hence of the induced surface charge density. Inside it, induced surface charge density is negative; outside it, positive. The tangential electric field is zero everywhere on the grounded electrical conductor, so the leading full electric field vanishes on that circle. The corresponding dipole-induced charge on a grounded plane integrates to zero over the whole plane: the negative central region is balanced by the positive exterior.

For finite $d$, $a=\sqrt{2}h$ is only the leading-order zero. With $u=h^{2/3}$ and $v=(h+d{)}^{2/3}$, the exact zero satisfies $a^2=uv(u+v)$, giving $a=\sqrt{2}(h+d/2)+O(d^2/h)$. For example, inserting any $d>0$ in the exact expression at $a=\sqrt{2}h$ does not give zero. This is a controlled electric dipole approximation, not an exact finite-separation identity.

The electric field within a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium vanishes. The normal electric field boundary condition, with outward normal vector $+\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, therefore gives $\sigma ={ϵ}_0{E}_z(0^{+})$. Directly below the monopole, $a=0$:For the electric dipole,The exact finite-separation answer iswhose Taylor series agrees with the boxed leading term. Although the real point charges have zero total electric charge, their unequal distances leave negative induced surface charge density immediately beneath them.

Joining p-type and n-type regions initially allows majority carriers to diffuse across and recombine. Exposed negative acceptor charge on the p side and positive donor charge on the n side form a depletion region. Its electric field points from n to p and balances diffusion at equilibrium. The Fermi level is then spatially constant, while the conduction and valence band edges bend across the built-in potential; this equilibrium barrier cannot supply continuous power to a load.

forward bias makes p positive relative to n, reducing the barrier from $q{V}_{bi}$ to $q(V_{bi}-V)$. electrons enter p material and holes enter n material, becoming minority carriers whose diffusion and recombination sustain the current. reverse bias enlarges the barrier and leaves a much smaller minority-carrier current until breakdown. The ideal diffusion model gives $I=I_0[e^{qV/k_{B}T}-1]$, the Shockley diode equation; depletion-region recombination, series resistance and breakdown limit this approximation. Minority-carrier injection on both sides is essential to the junction theory.^[ref]

A closed conducting enclosure redistributes surface charge so that an empty interior is protected from an external static electric field. Grounding fixes a reference and drains deposited charge, but an ideal isolated closed conductor also provides inward electrostatic shielding. Real seams, apertures and cables need careful bonding, shielding and feedthrough filtering. For time-varying fields the relevant wavelength, conductivity, geometry and penetration depth matter; a static argument alone is insufficient. Differential wiring and small pickup-loop areas can complement shielding, while careless multiple ground connections create unwanted current loops.

Ordinary copper or aluminium does not generally exclude a static magnetic field. High-permeability shells instead guide magnetic flux around the protected volume. Their effectiveness depends on shape, continuity, openings and saturation; magnetic history and mechanical stress can worsen performance. Nested shields and degaussing can reduce residual fields. Superconducting shielding can exploit the Meissner effect, but trapped flux, openings and critical-field limits require attention.

At nonzero frequency, eddy currents in conducting shields oppose changing magnetic flux. The skin depth isfor a good conductor in the usual diffusion approximation. Thickness of several skin depths suppresses penetration, but the very-low-frequency limit is weak for a normal metal. High-permeability and conducting layers can therefore complement each other. Active compensation coils are an additional method, not passive shielding. Test performance by applying known fields along relevant axes and measuring the residual field or induced signal over the apparatus bandwidth; room-temperature shielding materials and electronics can themselves add noise.

For elliptical polarization from circular and linear components, use coherent waves of the same frequency, propagation direction and fixed relative phase. Let the circular component be $A(\hat{\mathbf{x}}\cos \psi +\hat{\mathbf{y}}\sin \psi )$ and the linear component $B\hat{\mathbf{x}}\cos \psi$, with $A,B>0$. Their sum has $E_x=(A+B)\cos \psi$ and $E_y=A\sin \psi$, soThe tip of the electric field traces an ellipse with unequal semiaxes $A+B$ and $A$. Coherence is necessary: averaging unrelated phases does not create this fixed polarization ellipse.

A carrier in a locally parabolic isotropic band obeys $m^{\ast }\dot{\mathbf{v}}=q\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$, soIlluminate a high-mobility crystal with a transverse alternating electric field, sweep a calibrated static magnetic field at known microwave or far-infrared frequency, and detect resonant absorbed power. Cooling lengthens the relaxation time; resolving the resonance generally needs ${\omega }_c\tau \gg 1$. Varying field direction measures band anisotropy, while circular polarization distinguishes the two senses of rotation for opposite carrier charges. This is orbital motion rather than electron spin resonance.

The classic silicon/germanium measurements used single crystals near $4\mathrm{K}$, light modulation and circularly polarized microwaves, with directional scans to infer anisotropic carrier-energy surfaces.^[ref] Carrier generation, calibration, scattering linewidth and inhomogeneity must be separated from a genuine mass shift.

In a general band the cyclotron mass is an orbit property, $m_c={\hslash }^2(\partial A_k/\partial E)/(2\pi )$ for the appropriate field-normal orbit. It need not equal every component of the band-curvature mass tensor. For an ellipsoidal parabolic band with field along a principal $z$ direction it is $\sqrt{m_x{m}_y}$. Thus a single resonance does not determine a whole effective-mass tensor without angular information.

In the Hall effect, the Lorentz force deflects drifting charge carriers until a transverse electric field balances it: ${\mathbf{E}}_H=-{\mathbf{v}}_d\times \mathbf{B}$. Choose current along $x$, field along $z$ and define $R_H=E_y/(j_x{B}_z)$. Since $j_x=nq{v}_x$,The sign is negative for electrons with this convention. If the sample's mass density is ${\rho }_m$ and its molar mass is $M$, the atomic number density is $n_{\mathrm{at}}={\rho }_m{N}_A/M$, soMeasure the transverse voltage, specimen thickness, current and magnetic field; reversing field and current helps remove longitudinal-voltage pickup and offsets. This free-electron count from a Hall coefficient assumes one approximately free carrier band. Multiple bands, unequal mobilities or a complicated Fermi surface can make a Hall coefficient differ from $-1/(ne)$.