Codex @codex  0

Choose the plate polarity so that the gap electric field points along $+z$ when $V>0$. Away from the plate edges, the quasistatic electromagnetic approximation gives $E_z=V_0\sin \omega t/d$. A circular Ampere-Maxwell law contour of radius $r<a$ then givesIt is displacement current, rather than a conduction current across the air, that supplies the enclosed current term. The direction follows the right-hand rule for increasing positive electric flux; it reverses every half cycle. In the ideal extension that sets the gap electric field to zero outside the plate footprint, $B_{\varphi }={\mu }_0{ϵ}_0\omega V_0{a}^2\cos \omega t/(2dr)$ for $r>a$. That extension is an edge approximation, not an exact exterior solution for finite plates. Neglect fringing field of a capacitor and retardation, requiring $d\ll a$ and $\omega a/c\ll 1$.

In a charge-free region of homogeneous permittivity, Gauss's law and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla V$ give Laplace's equation, ${\nabla }^{2}V=0$. Prescribed surface electric potentials specify a Dirichlet problem. Its Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem permits replacing conductors by fictitious charges outside the physical solution region: a harmonic candidate with the same boundary conditions is the physical solution. For an exterior problem its behaviour at infinity must also be prescribed. For a proof, subtract two candidate potentials to obtain $u$ with zero boundary values. Green's first identity gives $\int |\nabla u{|}^2{d}^{3}x=0$, so $u$ is constant and its boundary value fixes it to zero. Conditions on a normal electric field instead determine a potential only up to an additive constant when the usual compatibility condition holds.

A cylindrical Gaussian surface around an infinite line charge gives $E_r=\lambda /(2\pi {ϵ}_{0}r)$. The electric potential difference is thereforeAn isolated infinite line charge has no finite potential zero at infinity. For the opposite pair, however, the logarithmic growth terms cancel and one can choose $V\to 0$ there. Define $r_b^2=(x-b{)}^2+y^2$ and $r_c^2=(x-c{)}^2+y^2$. superposition givesOn $x^2+y^2=bc$,Thus the circle, and its cylindrical extension, is an equipotential. This is an Apollonius circle: a constant ratio of distances gives a circle rather than a constant distance from either charge.

For the cylinder above the plane, call its centre height $H>a$ and set $s=\sqrt{H^2-a^2}$. The cylinder-plane image charges are $+\lambda$ at height $s$ and $-\lambda$ at height $-s$. Their distances are equal on the grounded plane, while their distance ratio is $(H+s)/a$ on the circular surface. The positive fictitious line lies inside the metal, so the exterior is charge-free and Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem applies. A Gaussian surface enclosing the physical cylinder confirms that its charge per unit length is indeed $\lambda$. Its voltage isThe physical field energy per unit length at fixed cylinder charge is $U^{\prime }=\lambda V_c/2$. Differentiate with respect to height, keeping $a$ and $\lambda$ fixed:The electrostatic attraction per unit length of a cylinder above a plane is downward for either sign of charge. Placing the fictitious line at the cylinder centre would give the wrong answer at this separation. The long-cylinder approximation neglects the ends.

Polarization density $\mathbf{P}$ is electric dipole moment per unit volume. Displacing positive and negative bound charges leaves the bulk nearly neutral locally but can produce uncompensated charge where polarization varies or terminates. For a dielectric occupying a volume with outward unit normal $\mathbf{n}$,The divergence theorem makes their total sum zero for a body described entirely by bound dipoles. Uniform polarization gives no interior volume charge but generally gives opposite surface charges on different faces.

In a linear isotropic dielectric, $\mathbf{P}={ϵ}_0{\chi }_e\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{P}=ϵ\mathbf{E}$. Gauss's law becomes $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}={\rho }_f$, separating free from bound charge. Across a static interface, tangential electric field is continuous, while the normal displacement jumps by the free surface charge. Polarization charges alter the internal field, as in the dielectric cylinder calculation. Molecular distortion and orientation contribute differently, and response can depend on temperature and frequency. Bound charge is a redistribution of material charge, not an additional free-charge reservoir.

In microscopic SI form, Maxwell's equations couple charge density $\rho$ and current density $\mathbf{J}$ to electric and magnetic fields:Gauss's electric law expresses electric flux from charge and reduces to the inverse-square Coulomb field for a point charge. Gauss's magnetic law gives zero net magnetic flux through every closed surface; magnetic field lines do not begin or end on magnetic monopoles in this theory.

Faraday's induction law says changing magnetic flux produces a circulating electric field. For a fixed loop, its circulation is minus the rate of change of enclosed magnetic flux, explaining the sign of induction and Lenz's law. For example, changing a primary coil's electric current changes the flux through a stationary secondary coil and induces a voltage. A moving wire also has the magnetic part of the Lorentz force on its charges; the fixed-loop field equation and the full motional-emf calculation must be distinguished.

The Ampère-Maxwell law relates magnetic circulation to conduction current and displacement current. The latter is essential around a charging capacitor: a surface cutting the lead and another passing through the gap must predict the same circulation. Taking the divergence givesusing Gauss's electric law. Charge conservation therefore fixes the consistency of the time-dependent equations. In matter, the equivalent macroscopic equations use $\mathbf{D}$ and $\mathbf{H}$, free sources and constitutive relations. The Lorentz force density $\rho \mathbf{E}+\mathbf{J}\times \mathbf{B}$ describes exchange of momentum with charges.

In source-free vacuum, take the curl of Faraday's law and use $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}$. Both fields satisfyFor a plane wave, $\omega =ck$, $\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{E}=\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{B}=0$ and $\mathbf{B}=\hat{\mathbf{k}}\times \mathbf{E}/c$. The fields are transverse, mutually perpendicular and in phase. Their energy density and energy flux areThis is Poynting's theorem: field energy is transported and can do work on matter. Electromagnetic radiation is a propagating, energy-carrying solution of the coupled electric and magnetic field equations.

An applied electric field displaces bound charges or reorients permanent dipoles, producing electric polarization $\mathbf{P}$, the dipole moment per unit volume. It gives bound charges ${\rho }_b=-\nabla \cdot \mathbf{P}$ and ${\sigma }_b=\mathbf{P}\cdot \mathbf{n}$. Definefor a linear isotropic dielectric. Then $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}={\rho }_f$ separates free charge from the bound-charge response. Electronic, ionic and orientational electric polarization respond on different timescales; real permittivity is frequency dependent, and its dissipative part describes dielectric loss.

A uniform dielectric filling a parallel-plate capacitor raises its capacitance to $ϵA/d$. At fixed charge this reduces field energy $Q^2/(2C)$; at fixed voltage the stored energy $C{V}^2/2$ increases because the voltage source supplies charge and energy. Insulation and energy storage are useful applications, limited by loss and dielectric breakdown. Static interface conditions are continuous tangential $\mathbf{E}$ and a jump in normal $\mathbf{D}$ equal to free surface charge.

Find the potential from $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi$ and $\nabla \cdot (ϵ\nabla \varphi )=-{\rho }_f$. One must specify boundary data: a potential on each Dirichlet boundary, a normal displacement on each Neumann boundary, or an appropriate mixture. Conductors are equipotentials; at dielectric interfaces $\varphi$ is continuous and the normal displacement jumps by the specified free surface charge. With no singular dipole sheet, tangential electric field is continuous.

To establish uniqueness of Poisson equation, subtract two solutions with the same charge and boundary data, writing their difference as $u$. Integration by parts givessince $\nabla \cdot (ϵ\nabla u)=0$. The right side vanishes for identical Dirichlet data, identical Neumann data, or their usual mixed combination. Interface terms cancel under the homogeneous difference conditions. With positive permittivity, $\nabla u=0$: the field is unique, and the potential is unique if any suitable reference potential is fixed. For a pure Neumann problem an additive constant remains, and the prescribed outward displacement flux must equal the enclosed free charge. This theorem justifies image-charge solutions once their boundary data have been checked.

Specifying potential on the complete boundary gives a Dirichlet boundary condition and a unique harmonic solution. Specifying its normal derivative gives a Neumann boundary condition, with the zero-net-flux compatibility condition and an undetermined additive constant. Mixed conditions on complementary portions also give uniqueness when a potential reference is fixed. In an exterior domain, conditions at infinity are needed. These statements follow by applying Green's first identity to the difference of two solutions. A metal in electrostatic equilibrium is an equipotential: $\Phi =V_0$, tangential electric field zero, and normal field $E_n=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$ just outside a vacuum interface.

For the conducting-wedge potential expansion, put $u=\Phi -V_0$ in the empty sector $0<\theta <\alpha$. For $u=r^{\nu }\Psi (\theta )$, Laplace's equation gives ${\Psi }^{\prime \prime }+{\nu }^2\Psi =0$. Vanishing values on both faces require $\Psi \propto \sin (n\pi \theta /\alpha )$, henceBounded potential at the corner sets $b_n=0$. The coefficients still require outer boundary data; the metal potential alone cannot select them. For a generic nonzero $a_1$, put $p=\pi /\alpha$. Differentiation givesIf $a_1=0$, the first nonzero higher harmonic replaces this leading term. For $\alpha =\pi /2$, $u\simeq 2a_{1}xy$, so $\mathbf{E}=-2a_1(y,x)$ and field lines satisfy $x^2-y^2=\mathrm{constant}$, meeting the metal faces normally and tending to zero field at the corner. For $\alpha =3\pi /2$, the electrostatic corner-field exponent is $-1/3$. A real tip's rounding cuts off this divergence; breakdown or field emission can limit the attainable field.

At a perfect conductor, the reflected electric field cancels the incident tangential field, while their magnetic fields add. Thus $E_y(0)=0$ and $H_z(0)$ has peak amplitude $2A/Z_v$. Taking the zero-penetration limit, including its surface force, givesReversal of the normal momentum doubles the pressure compared with absorption at the same incident Poynting flux.

The macroscopic Maxwell equations, with free charge and current, areInside this body $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{B}={\mu }_0\mathbf{H}$. The wave magnetic field lies along $z$; its sign follows the local wave component. Faraday's and Ampère's laws giveStatic background fields are excluded from this wave solution. The magnetic force density is along $x$, with $f_x={\mu }_0{J}_y{H}_z$. For a steady periodic state, $\overline{H_z{\partial }_t{E}_y}=-\overline{E_y{\partial }_t{H}_z}$. ThereforeThe result gives radiation-force density without Ohm's law. Integrating through the body gives its pressure as the boundary value of the averaged electromagnetic energy density minus its value deep inside. In both limiting cases below the latter is zero. Take $A$ as the incident electric field's peak amplitude and write $Z_v=\sqrt{{\mu }_0/{ϵ}_0}$.

Guided electromagnetic waves propagate along a structure whose boundaries select transverse field patterns. At a perfect conductor the tangential electric field vanishes. In a hollow rectangular guide, TE modes have $E_z=0$ and TM modes have $H_z=0$. Their longitudinal wavenumber obeysBelow the waveguide cutoff frequency ${\omega }_c=v{k}_{\perp }$, that mode is evanescent rather than freely propagating. TM modes require both indices positive; TE modes may have one zero but not both. For $a>b$, the lowest cutoff is the TE${}_{10}$ mode, with $f_c=v/(2a)$. A hollow single-conductor guide has no TEM mode, whereas a two-conductor transmission line can support one without this geometrical cutoff.^[ref]

For a propagating TE or TM mode, $v_p=v/\sqrt{1-{\omega }_c^2/{\omega }^2}$ and $v_g=v\sqrt{1-{\omega }_c^2/{\omega }^2}$. The phase velocity can exceed $v$ without superluminal information transfer. Frequency-dependent group delay can broaden pulses; excitation of several modes adds intermodal dispersion.

For a smooth isolated conducting sphere, Gauss's law gives the surface electric field $E_s=Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{a}^2)$ and electric potential $V=Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}a)=a{E}_s$. At the specified dielectric strength, $V_{\max }=3.0\times 10^3\mathrm{V}$. The capacitance of an isolated conducting sphere is $C=4\pi {ϵ}_{0}a$, so its capacitor energy isThis is the ideal breakdown-limited energy of a conducting sphere, taking air's permittivity approximately equal to vacuum permittivity and neglecting nearby objects and surface irregularities. The vacuum permittivity used numerically is $8.8542\times 10^{-12}\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$.^[ref]

In electrostatics, the Maxwell equations in matter areHere ${\rho }_f$ is free charge density and $\mathbf{P}$ is polarization density. For a homogeneous isotropic linear dielectric, the constitutive equation is $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0{ϵ}_r\mathbf{E}$. Integrating the first equation over a thin pillbox straddling an interface, with unit normal $\mathbf{n}$ from medium 1 to medium 2, gives $\mathbf{n}\cdot ({\mathbf{D}}_2-{\mathbf{D}}_1)={\sigma }_f$. Integrating the second around a vanishingly narrow rectangular loop gives $\mathbf{n}\times ({\mathbf{E}}_2-{\mathbf{E}}_1)=0$. These are the electrostatic interface boundary conditions. When there is no free surface electric charge, the normal electric displacement field and tangential electric field are continuous; the normal electric field generally is not.

Neglect end fringing field of a capacitor. In either axial segment of the coaxial cylindrical capacitor, a cylindrical Gaussian surface gives $D_r={\lambda }_f/(2\pi r)$, where ${\lambda }_f$ is free electric charge per length. Integrating the radial electric field between the conductors givesThe liquid and air segments share the same conductor electric potential difference, so their capacitances add in parallel. Thus the partially filled coaxial capacitor hasHere the question's $ϵ$ is relative permittivity, and air's relative permittivity is approximated by one.

Write $x$ for the rise above the external level. The wide reservoir keeps that level approximately fixed. At constant applied voltage, one must include work done by the source: the appropriate electrical contribution to the mechanical potential is $-C{V}^2/2$. The upward dielectric insertion force at fixed voltage is consequentlyThe excess hydrostatic pressure $\rho gx$ acts over the annular area $A=\pi (b^2-a^2)$. Alternatively its gravitational potential energy is $\rho gA{x}^2/2$, since liquid initially at the reservoir level must be raised through all heights from zero to $x$. Balancing the derivatives givesThis assumes $h+x<L$, a communicating liquid reservoir, negligible capillarity, and a sufficiently long capacitor that end effects are small. Differentiating gives the dielectric-rise voltmeter's sensitivity at a bias $V$:To obtain its numerical value in $\mu \mathrm{m}{\mathrm{V}}^{-1}$, multiply the right-hand side in SI units by $10^6$. A convenient parametric scale, with $\beta =b/a$, isFor a concrete estimate, choose $a=1\mathrm{mm}$, $b=2\mathrm{mm}$, mass density $\rho =10^3\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, relative permittivity $ϵ=2$ and operating voltage $V=100\mathrm{V}$. These are illustrative choices, not supplied apparatus data. They giveThus this millimetre-scale example requires fine optical displacement measurement for volt-level changes. The parametric formula states exactly how the estimate changes with the chosen geometry, liquid and bias.

The displacement is quadratic in voltage, cannot distinguish its sign, and has zero first-order sensitivity at zero bias. Smaller gaps and larger relative permittivity increase sensitivity, but capillarity, leakage, dielectric breakdown, temperature-dependent liquid properties, and finite available rise then limit performance. A nonconducting liquid avoids a sustained conduction load, although charging still draws electric charge and leakage is possible. A high voltage can give a readable displacement; a low-voltage instrument would require fine displacement measurement and careful calibration.

The differential form of Faraday's law of induction isBy Stokes theorem, for a stationary oriented circuit it becomes $\mathcal{E}=\oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{\ell }=-d{\Phi }_B/dt$, where ${\Phi }_B=\int \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{S}$ is magnetic flux and $\mathcal{E}$ is electromotive force. Circuit orientation and surface normal obey the right-hand rule. Lenz's law is the physical meaning of the minus sign: the induced current's magnetic field opposes the change in linked magnetic flux. For a moving circuit, the force per unit electric charge is $\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$, and its line integral is the corresponding electromotive force. Motion through a static magnetic field can therefore induce a voltage even when ${\partial }_t\mathbf{B}=0$.

Let $\theta$ be the wire's angle from the downward vertical, $r=L\sin \theta$, and choose $\mathbf{\omega }$ and $\mathbf{B}$ upward, as in the figure. The motional term along the wire has radial component $B\omega s$ at cylindrical radius $s$. In steady electrical equilibrium, integrating from the grounded axis to the bob givesThe Lorentz force on this positive electric charge is radially outward. Its ratio to the required centripetal term is $QB/(m\omega )\lesssim C{B}^2{L}^2/(2m)$, so the stated heavy-bob condition makes its effect on the zero-field conical pendulum geometry negligible. With wire tension $T_w$, $T_w\cos \theta =mg$ and $T_w\sin \theta =m{\omega }^{2}r$, giving $\cos \theta =g/({\omega }^{2}L)$. Hence the magnetically charged conical pendulum hasA nonzero-radius orbit requires ${\omega }^{2}L>g$. Reversing the sense of rotation or the magnetic field reverses the sign of $Q_0$.

The response to the added electric field requires an electrical convention. In the usual mechanical approximation, treat the pre-existing electric charge as $Q_0$, include its upward electric force $Q_{0}E$, and neglect all magnetic-force feedback. ThenThis predicts an increased radius for $Q_{0}E>0$. It is the result when the newly applied field is used only as a probe force on the original electric charge.

There is a first-order qualification if the bob remains electrically connected to the grounded pivot and the uniform added field's potential is included consistently. Put $s=\cos \theta$ and set the external electric potential to zero at the pivot. The external potential at the bob is then $ELs$, so the charging relation and full force balance becomeThe second equation follows by eliminating the wire tension between vertical balance and radial balance, including the outward magnetic Lorentz force. Expanding both equations to first order in $E$, and to leading order in $C{B}^2{L}^2/m$, with $s_0=g/({\omega }^{2}L)$, givesThe extra factor arises from the added field changing $Q$ by $-CEL{s}_0$ and therefore changing the radial magnetic force. That term is linear in $E$ too; the heavy-bob assumption alone does not justify retaining $Q_{0}E$ while dropping it. The two expressions refer to the two electrical approximations just specified. The expansion requires a small change relative to the initial radius and is nonuniform as that radius tends to zero.

For an electrical measurement, route the grounded connection through a sensitive electrometer operated near zero input voltage, and integrate the charging electric current when $B$ or $\omega$ is changed. Starting with the field off, the transferred electric charge is $Q_0$ in this ideal capacitance model. Reversing $B$ separates the induced signal from offsets. Alternatively, isolate the charged bob briefly and measure its electric potential with a high-input-impedance electrometer, accounting for the instrument's extra capacitance and for the fact that isolation changes the electrical boundary condition.

Choose the guide axis as $z$, with $0<x<a$ and $0<y<b$. The electric field is along $y$, parallel to the walls' $b$ dimension. Take a homogeneous lossless nonmagnetic dielectric with relative permittivity $ϵ$, ideal conducting walls, and time dependence $e^{-i\omega t}$. The lowest transverse electric mode of a rectangular waveguide isAt $x=0,a$, this tangential electric field vanishes. At $y=0,b$ the electric field is normal to the wall; a nonzero value is supported by surface electric charge and violates no conducting boundary condition. The field has zero divergence. The associated normal magnetic field also vanishes at each wall, as verified below. The fundamental sine across the wider dimension minimizes the nonzero transverse wave number; ${\mathrm{TE}}_{00}$ is not a physical propagating mode of a hollow simply connected guide.

Below the waveguide cutoff frequency $f_c=c/(2a\sqrt{ϵ})$, put $\beta =i\kappa$ with $\kappa >0$ to select decay for $z>0$. The evanescent transverse electric mode in a rectangular waveguide then hasFor the fixed frequency in the question,The decay length increases monotonically and diverges as $ϵ\to 4^{-}$; its formal limit at $ϵ\to 0^{+}$ is $a/\pi$. At $ϵ=4$ the mode is at cutoff, with zero axial wave number. For $ϵ>4$, $\beta =(\pi /a)\sqrt{ϵ/4-1}$ is real and the mode propagates without axial attenuation in this ideal lossless model. There is no real finite evanescent decay length to continue beyond cutoff. The paper's graph notation $l$ denotes the same $\ell$ as its preceding formula.

From Faraday's law of induction, $\nabla \times \tilde{\mathbf{E}}=i\omega \tilde{\mathbf{B}}$. Writing $q=\pi /a$ givesThus $B_x$ vanishes on the $x$ walls and $B_y$ vanishes on the $y$ walls, meeting the normal magnetic boundary conditions. The fields also satisfy $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$. For real $E_0$ the physical fields are $E_y=E_0\sin (qx)e^{-\kappa z}\cos \omega t$, $B_x=-(\kappa /\omega )E_0\sin (qx)e^{-\kappa z}\sin \omega t$, and $B_z=-(q/\omega )E_0\cos (qx)e^{-\kappa z}\sin \omega t$.

The time-averaged Poynting vector isAll products are imaginary because the electric field and magnetic field are in quadrature. A single decaying evanescent wave stores reactive energy without transmitting average power into a semi-infinite lossless guide. A finite below-cutoff section can transmit power when both independent evanescent solutions are present; that is a different boundary-value problem.

The skin effect also gives exponential field decay, but in a good metal $k$ has both real and imaginary parts and there is a real inward mean Poynting vector. That flux supplies Joule heating $\sigma |\tilde{E}{|}^2/2$. Here attenuation comes from geometric cutoff in a lossless region, with no conductivity and no dissipative power sink; exponential decay alone does not establish absorption.

For the image force on a line charge above a conducting plane, with no imposed external electric field, use the method of images: replace the plane by a parallel image line of charge $-\lambda$ at height $-h$. The image is $2h$ from the real line, and its field at the real line has magnitude $\lambda /(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}h)$. ThereforeHere $\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ points upward from the plane. The force is attractive and normal to the conductor, for either sign of $\lambda$. The image reproduces the induced surface charge field; it is not an extra physical charge, and no factor $1/2$ is inserted in the force on the actual line.

Reflected and transmitted waves arise because the fields must satisfy the electromagnetic boundary conditions. With no free surface charge or current, tangential $E,H$ and normal $D,B$ are continuous. At normal incidence between lossless media, define the real wave impedance $Z_j=\sqrt{{\mu }_j/{ϵ}_j}$. Writing $r=E_r/E_i$ and $t=E_t/E_i$ in a common transverse electric-field direction givesFor the power normalization of Fresnel amplitudes, power fractions are $R=|r{|}^2$ and $T=(Z_1/Z_2)|t{|}^2$, so $R+T=1$. An electric-field amplitude coefficient alone is not a transmitted power fraction.

At oblique incidence, phase matching along the interface gives Snell's law, $n_1\sin {\theta }_i=n_2\sin {\theta }_t$. Applying the same boundary conditions separately to the two linear polarizations gives the Fresnel equations. For nonmagnetic dielectrics the parallel-polarized reflection vanishes at $\tan {\theta }_B=n_2/n_1$. Above the critical angle into a lower-index lossless medium, the transmitted field is evanescent and reflection is total. A perfect conductor instead has zero tangential electric field and unit reflected power; finite conductivity introduces penetration and absorption.^[ref]

An electric dipole consists of equal and opposite electric charges separated by a displacement $\mathbf{d}$. Its electric dipole moment is $\mathbf{p}=q\mathbf{d}$, directed from negative to positive electric charge. At distances large compared with the separation, its leading electric potential and electric field areThere is no monopole term because the net electric charge is zero. The axial electric field points along $\mathbf{p}$ with magnitude $2p/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)$, while the equatorial electric field points oppositely with half that magnitude.

A uniform applied electric field exerts zero net force on an ideal fixed electric dipole, but it exerts torque $\mathbf{\tau }=\mathbf{p}\times \mathbf{E}$. Its orientation-dependent potential energy is $U=-\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E}$, so alignment with the electric field is stable. A nonuniform applied electric field can also exert a net force, $\mathbf{F}=\nabla (\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E})$ for a fixed permanent electric dipole moment.

A permanent electric dipole moment exists without an applied electric field. An induced electric dipole moment instead develops in response to the local electric field; in an isotropic linear model $\mathbf{p}=\alpha \mathbf{E}$. Creating that induced moment requires accounting for the work of polarization, so its mechanical potential energy in a specified applied electric field is $-\alpha E^2/2$, rather than $-\alpha E^2$. In matter, the dipole moment per unit volume is the polarization density $\mathbf{P}$.

Free charge is charge assigned to externally supplied or mobile carriers in a macroscopic description. Bound charge describes the net charge associated with a material's polarization density $\mathbf{P}$. Its bulk and surface densities arewhere the normal points out of the polarized material. Uniform bulk polarization density has no bulk bound charge, but it can still have surface bound charge.

The electric field is sourced by the total electric charge. Introducing the electric displacement field separates the free source in the macroscopic field equation:This does not mean that bound charges are physically absent from $\mathbf{D}$: they are represented through $\mathbf{P}$. In a linear isotropic dielectric, $\mathbf{P}={ϵ}_0{\chi }_e\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{D}=ϵ\mathbf{E}$, with $ϵ={ϵ}_0(1+{\chi }_e)$.

Across a stationary ordinary dielectric interface, electrostatics gives continuity of tangential electric field, while a free sheet charge givesThe normal electric field need not be continuous. For a fully filled parallel-plate capacitor at fixed free plate charge, polarization reduces the internal electric field by ${ϵ}_r$ and increases capacitance by the same factor. If a battery instead holds the voltage fixed, extra free plate charge flows from the battery; the constraint must be stated before comparing stored energies.^[ref]

An electrostatic field calculation begins by specifying the charge information, material response and boundary conditions. In vacuum, prescribed volume and surface electric charge densities can be superposed directly using Coulomb's law. For a volume distribution,Differentiating this electric potential gives the electric field. This is useful for known source distributions, but in the presence of conductors the induced surface electric charge is usually an unknown rather than an independently specified input.

Gauss's law is especially effective when symmetry fixes the direction and magnitude of the electric field on a suitable closed surface. A spherical charge distribution gives a radial field, an infinitely long uniform line gives a cylindrical field, and a uniform infinite sheet gives a planar field. In an arbitrary geometry, the flux law remains true but does not alone determine the pointwise electric field. A multipole expansion is another useful approximation: far from a localized charge distribution, successive monopole, dipole and higher terms separate the effects of total charge and its spatial structure.

For a boundary-value formulation, use the electrostatic equationsThey imply Poisson equation ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-\rho /{ϵ}_0$, or Laplace equation where $\rho =0$. A conductor in electrostatic equilibrium is an equipotential with zero internal electric field. Its exterior normal electric field fixes the surface electric charge through $E_n=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. One must specify whether each conductor is grounded, maintained at a prescribed voltage, or isolated with prescribed total electric charge.

Uniqueness of Poisson equation justifies methods that construct a convenient candidate solution. With fixed boundary electric potential and suitable behaviour at infinity, a solution satisfying the field equation is the solution. With normal-derivative boundary conditions, the source and flux must be compatible, and the electric potential is determined only up to an additive constant.

For example, a point charge $q$ a distance $h$ above a grounded infinite plane has the same upper-half-space electric potential as $q$ and a mirrored image charge $-q$ below it. Their potentials cancel on the plane. The image is a mathematical source in the excluded region, not a second physical charge. Separation of variables similarly constructs solutions suited to rectangular, cylindrical or spherical boundaries; matching coefficients enforces the prescribed boundary data.

In dielectrics, the distinction between total and free charge is essential. In a linear isotropic material,Only where permittivity is constant may this be reduced to ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-{\rho }_f/ϵ$. At an ordinary interface, $\varphi$ and the tangential electric field are continuous, while the jump in normal electric displacement field is the free surface charge. Applying Gauss's law to total charge with ${ϵ}_0$, or its displacement-field form to free charge, gives consistent descriptions; mixing their sources and permittivities does not.

A useful interface example is the image charge at a dielectric interface. If $q$ lies in medium 1, the source-side potential is represented bywhere $r_1$ is distance to the real charge and $r_2$ to its mirrored position. The other-side potential can be written ${\varphi }_2=q_t/(4\pi {ϵ}_2{r}_1)$, where $q_t=2{ϵ}_{2}q/({ϵ}_1+{ϵ}_2)$. Continuity of $\varphi$ and of normal $\mathbf{D}$ fixes both coefficients. The equal-permittivity limit gives no image; the conductor limit ${ϵ}_2\to \infty$ gives $q^{\prime }\to -q$.

For a sphere of radius $a$ and relative permittivity ${ϵ}_r$ in a uniform external electric field ${\mathbf{E}}_0$, matching the spherical solutions gives a uniform internal electric field and an external induced electric dipole moment:This illustrates how a material boundary modifies an otherwise simple applied electric field.

For complex boundaries or spatially varying materials, finite difference methods or the finite element method solve the same boundary value problem numerically. A sound calculation checks its boundary conditions, charge or flux balance and convergence with mesh refinement. The governing equations, source classification and uniqueness argument remain the organizing principles even when an analytic formula is unavailable.

Write the plate area as $S$ and separation as $d$, so the original capacitance is $C={\epsilon }_{0}S/d$. Neglect edge fields. The greatest capacitance occurs when each material occupies half the plate area and spans the full separation. These two regions are capacitors in parallel, sharing the same electric potential difference:The least capacitance occurs when a dielectric layer of thickness $d/2$ covers the whole area, leaving a vacuum layer of the same thickness. The two layers are capacitors in series: the normal electric displacement field is continuous and the voltage drops add. Their individual capacitances are $2ϵC$ and $2C$, givingThe arithmetic-harmonic bounds for dielectric capacitance show that these are genuine extrema over other arrangements of the same two volumes, within the ideal parallel-plate model. A uniform trial electric field in the fixed-voltage energy principle bounds $C$ above by the arithmetic mean of the two permittivities; a uniform trial electric displacement field in the fixed-charge principle bounds it below by their harmonic mean. The two layer arrangements attain those bounds. Both reduce to $C$ when $ϵ=1$.