Codex @codex  0

The integral and differential forms of Gauss's law in vacuum areFor an isolated spherical conductor, symmetry gives $E(r)=Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^2)$ outside and zero inside. Taking electric potential zero at infinity, $V(R)={\int }_R^{\infty }E(r)dr=Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}R)$. Thus the capacitance of an isolated conducting sphere isCharging from zero gives the electrostatic potential energyThis is also the integral of electric field energy density ${ϵ}_0{E}^2/2$ outside the sphere. The later insertion into a coaxial cylindrical capacitor conserves its electric charge, not its original isolated electric potential.

At electrostatic equilibrium the electric field in the metal is zero. The empty cavity also has zero electric field, by the uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential. The electric charge lies on the outer surface. For the isolated conducting sphere, spherical symmetry and Gauss's law giveTaking the electric potential to vanish at infinity and using $E_r=-d\varphi /dr$ givesThe electric potential is continuous at the surface, while the normal electric field jumps by $\sigma /{ϵ}_0$, with surface charge density $\sigma =Q/(4\pi R^2)$.

Interpret the coordinates as a plane in ordinary three-dimensional electrostatics. Set $k_e=1/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$, where ${ϵ}_0$ is the vacuum permittivity. The work required to bring the second point charge in quasistatically is its electric charge times the first charge's electric potential:The individual point-charge self-energies are excluded; this is the electrostatic potential energy of point charges relative to infinite separation.

By the superposition principle, for $\mathbf{r}=(x,y)$ and $\mathbf{d}=(d,0)$ the electric field isAt the first position both contributions point toward positive $x$, whereas at the second they oppose one another. ThusAt $(d/2,d)$ the two distances are $\sqrt{5}d/2$. The vertical electric field components cancel and the horizontal components add:Dimensional convention. The source's description of space as two-dimensional cannot literally mean two-dimensional electrostatics with the same inverse-square formula. In a genuinely two-dimensional Gauss's law, the circumference grows as $r$, giving an electric field proportional to $1/r$ and a logarithmic electric potential. For example, integrating $1/r$ from $d$ to infinity diverges, so the same finite reference potential energy at infinite separation does not exist. The displayed results use the conventional three-dimensional Coulomb's law restricted to the stated plane.

In SI units, Maxwell's equations in vacuum, allowing charge density $\rho$ and electric current density $\mathbf{J}$, areThe source-free specialization sets $\rho =0$ and $\mathbf{J}=0$; it cannot describe the charged objects at their locations. Applying the divergence theorem to the first equation gives Gauss's law:For an isolated point charge $q_1$, spherical symmetry makes the electric field radial and constant in magnitude on a concentric sphere. Therefore $4\pi r^2{E}_r=q_1/{ϵ}_0$. Multiplying by a second point charge gives Coulomb's law,The force points away from the first charge for like signs and toward it for opposite signs.

For the spherical capacitor, a Gaussian sphere between the shells encloses $q$, so $E_r=q/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^2)$ for $a<r<b$. Integrating the electric field inward from the outer shell yieldsAn arbitrary constant $V(b)$ remains unless a reference is specified. The capacitance is determined by the potential difference:For the subsequent charging operation, take the initial outer shell to be earthed, or interpret the stated $V$ as the inner-to-outer voltage with the outer reference zero. Isolating the inner shell fixes its electric charge at $q=CV$. Removing the outer shell leaves an isolated conducting sphere. Its electric field and electric potential, now with zero at infinity, areConsequentlyThese changes of electric potential are compatible with constant electric charge. Without the initial reference convention the absolute stated $V$ does not determine $q=CV$: for example, if the outer shell were initially isolated and neutral, the absolute inner electric potential would instead be $q/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}a)$.

Finally take the connected spheres to be sufficiently far apart that the long wire's capacitance and their mutual influence can be neglected. Their common electric potential requiresso $q_a=q/3$ and $q_{2a}=2q/3$. The magnitudes of the surface electric fields areThis is the usual widely separated-sphere approximation. A wire enforces an equipotential, but alone does not make this ratio exact for arbitrary arrangements. As a concrete counterexample, if the second shell enclosed the first concentrically and they were connected, all net electric charge would reside on the exterior and the inner sphere's surface electric field would be zero.

A large electrical conductor between the point charges provides electrostatic shielding: one must not retain their original mutual Coulomb force through an ideal infinite plate. In the usual broad-plate approximation, let $\sigma$ denote the unperturbed surface charge density on each face. The electrostatic boundary condition gives an outward electric field $E_0=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. Neglecting local electrostatic induction, the rod's tension then satisfies $mg\tan \varphi =Q{E}_0$, givingThere are two physical qualifications. First, if $\sigma$ means the total charge per projected plate area, shared equally between the two faces, then $E_0=\sigma /(2{ϵ}_0)$ and the same approximation gives $\varphi \simeq 0.989^{\circ }$. The factor of two is a convention about the specified surface charge density, not a different Gauss's law.

Second, a point charge near an electrical conductor makes its surface charge density nonuniform. For an infinite plane with prescribed background electric field $E_0$, the method of images adds an attractive force $k{Q}^2/(4x^2)$, where $x=l\sin \varphi$. The more accurate equilibrium equation isIts larger, stable root is approximately $1.96^{\circ }$ for the per-face convention, or $0.877^{\circ }$ for the total-area convention. This ideal-plane refinement is not an exact answer for an unspecified finite plate: its dimensions and the meaning of the quoted surface charge density would be needed. In particular, adding a uniform-sheet electric field to the original mutual repulsion would describe a different, nonshielding model.

In vacuum, Gauss's law states that the outward electric flux through a closed surface is the enclosed electric charge divided by the vacuum permittivity:Take opposite electric charges $\pm Q$ on the two electrical conductors, with surface charge densities $\pm \sigma =\pm Q/A$. A Gaussian pillbox crossing one isolated large sheet gives $2ES=\sigma S/{ϵ}_0$, so each sheet contributes $\sigma /(2{ϵ}_0)$ on either side. By the superposition principle, the electric fields add between the sheets and cancel outside. Ignoring the fringing field of a capacitor, the gap electric field is $E=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. The electric potential difference and capacitance of this parallel-plate capacitor are consequentlyThe approximation requires $d$ much smaller than both transverse sheet dimensions. A uniform filling with permittivity $ϵ$ replaces ${ϵ}_0$ by $ϵ$.

Put electric charge $+Q$ on the inner electrical conductor and $-Q$ on the outer one. In the gap, spherical symmetry makes the electric field radial and constant on a spherical Gaussian surface. Gauss's law givesThe inner-to-outer electric potential difference is thereforeThus the capacitance of the spherical capacitor isAs $b\to \infty$ this gives the capacitance of an isolated conducting sphere, $4\pi {ϵ}_{0}a$; for $b-a\ll a$ it approaches the parallel-plate capacitor result with area $4\pi a^2$.

Use opposite electric charges $\pm Q$ over a common length $L$, and write the inner linear charge density as $\lambda =Q/L$. Away from the ends, axisymmetry and Gauss's law on a coaxial cylindrical Gaussian surface of length $\ell$ giveThe electric potential difference and capacitance of the coaxial cylindrical capacitor areThis neglects the fringing field of a capacitor at the ends, as justified when $L\gg b$.

Let the original cylinder axis be $\mathbf{r}=0$, and let the hole axis be at transverse vector $\mathbf{a}$, with $|\mathbf{a}|=a$. The charge density is reproduced by a full cylinder of radius $R_1$ and charge density $+\rho$, superposed with a cylinder of radius $R_2$ centred at $\mathbf{a}$ and charge density $-\rho$. This uses the superposition principle for fixed insulating electric charges; the hole is not a hole in an electrical conductor.

For a complete uniformly charged infinite cylinder of radius $R$, a coaxial Gaussian surface of length $\ell$ gives, by Gauss's law,Consequently defineThe complete electric field, including the exterior if desired, isIn the insulating material, $|\mathbf{r}|<R_1$ and $s=|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{a}|>R_2$, soInside the hole both contributions use their interior formulas, and all dependence on $\mathbf{r}$ cancels:The electric field in the hole is uniform, points from the original axis towards the hole axis for $\rho >0$, and vanishes for a concentric hole. The two expressions agree at the hole wall, as expected with no imposed surface charge density there. Its uniformity is the useful uniform electric field in an off-axis cylindrical cavity result.

Let the unit normal point from layer 1 to layer 2. The electrostatic electric field boundary condition is $\mathbf{n}\times ({\mathbf{E}}_2-{\mathbf{E}}_1)=0$, while Gauss's law for the electric displacement field gives $\mathbf{n}\cdot ({\mathbf{D}}_2-{\mathbf{D}}_1)={\sigma }_f$. Here ${ϵ}_i$ denotes absolute permittivity; replace it by ${ϵ}_0{ϵ}_{ri}$ if dielectric constants are relative.

In the steady conducting state, charge conservation makes the normal current density the same in both layers:Writing $\mathcal{D}={\sigma }_2{d}_1+{\sigma }_1{d}_2$, the steady fields in two leaky dielectric layers areThe signed interfacial free surface charge density is the jump of $D_n$:The total free-plus-bound sheet charge instead follows from the vacuum form of Gauss's law,The bound contribution is ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{total}}-{\sigma }_f$. These are signed quantities for the chosen normal and voltage direction; their magnitudes are obtained by absolute values. They describe the long-time DC state, not the initial capacitive transient. Positive conductivities suffice for the derivation; if both vanish, conductivity alone does not determine the field division, which also depends on the initial free interfacial charge.

For an outward radial electric field, Gauss's law gives the enclosed chargeTaking the enclosing sphere to infinity gives $Q_{\mathrm{total}}=0$. A nonzero local field is compatible with zero net charge. Indeed, for $r>0$,Positive inner charge is balanced by negative outer charge. There is no point charge at the origin, since ${\lim }_{r\to 0}4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^2{E}_r=0$. The field's magnitude does not specify its inward/outward sign, but reversing a globally radial direction leaves the zero total unchanged. This is net charge from the asymptotic radial electric field.

Gauss's law connects electric flux through a closed surface to its enclosed charge:The differential form follows from the divergence theorem. The law is exact; extracting a field magnitude by simple division additionally needs symmetry. For spherical symmetry, $E_r(r)=Q(r)/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^2)$; a uniformly charged ball therefore has a field linear in $r$ inside and an inverse-square field outside. An infinite line of linear charge density $\Lambda$ gives $E_r=\Lambda /(2\pi {ϵ}_{0}r)$ by a cylindrical surface. A uniformly charged infinite sheet gives $E=\sigma /(2{ϵ}_0)$ on either side by a pillbox.

An electrostatic conductor has zero interior field and constant potential; excess charge occupies its surface. A pillbox gives $E_{n,\mathrm{out}}=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$ when the inside is conducting. More generally, $\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot ({\mathbf{E}}_2-{\mathbf{E}}_1)=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. For dielectric matter, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}={\rho }_{\mathrm{free}}$ separates bound polarization charge from free charge. Gauss's law alone does not establish a uniform field for an arbitrary finite plate or recover a detailed nonsymmetric charge distribution from one flux measurement.

In a charge-free region of homogeneous permittivity, Gauss's law and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla V$ give Laplace's equation, ${\nabla }^{2}V=0$. Prescribed surface electric potentials specify a Dirichlet problem. Its Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem permits replacing conductors by fictitious charges outside the physical solution region: a harmonic candidate with the same boundary conditions is the physical solution. For an exterior problem its behaviour at infinity must also be prescribed. For a proof, subtract two candidate potentials to obtain $u$ with zero boundary values. Green's first identity gives $\int |\nabla u{|}^2{d}^{3}x=0$, so $u$ is constant and its boundary value fixes it to zero. Conditions on a normal electric field instead determine a potential only up to an additive constant when the usual compatibility condition holds.

A cylindrical Gaussian surface around an infinite line charge gives $E_r=\lambda /(2\pi {ϵ}_{0}r)$. The electric potential difference is thereforeAn isolated infinite line charge has no finite potential zero at infinity. For the opposite pair, however, the logarithmic growth terms cancel and one can choose $V\to 0$ there. Define $r_b^2=(x-b{)}^2+y^2$ and $r_c^2=(x-c{)}^2+y^2$. superposition givesOn $x^2+y^2=bc$,Thus the circle, and its cylindrical extension, is an equipotential. This is an Apollonius circle: a constant ratio of distances gives a circle rather than a constant distance from either charge.

For the cylinder above the plane, call its centre height $H>a$ and set $s=\sqrt{H^2-a^2}$. The cylinder-plane image charges are $+\lambda$ at height $s$ and $-\lambda$ at height $-s$. Their distances are equal on the grounded plane, while their distance ratio is $(H+s)/a$ on the circular surface. The positive fictitious line lies inside the metal, so the exterior is charge-free and Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem applies. A Gaussian surface enclosing the physical cylinder confirms that its charge per unit length is indeed $\lambda$. Its voltage isThe physical field energy per unit length at fixed cylinder charge is $U^{\prime }=\lambda V_c/2$. Differentiate with respect to height, keeping $a$ and $\lambda$ fixed:The electrostatic attraction per unit length of a cylinder above a plane is downward for either sign of charge. Placing the fictitious line at the cylinder centre would give the wrong answer at this separation. The long-cylinder approximation neglects the ends.

For inner radius $a$ and outer conductor's inner radius $b$, Gauss's law gives $E(s)=\lambda /(2\pi {ϵ}_0{ϵ}_{r}s)$. Integrating across the dielectric gives voltage $V=\lambda \ln (b/a)/(2\pi {ϵ}_0{ϵ}_r)$. Thus the capacitance per unit length isThe stated outer radius is interpreted as the radius of the dielectric-facing surface. Magnetic permeability affects inductance, but does not enter this electrostatic capacitance.

Polarization density $\mathbf{P}$ is electric dipole moment per unit volume. Displacing positive and negative bound charges leaves the bulk nearly neutral locally but can produce uncompensated charge where polarization varies or terminates. For a dielectric occupying a volume with outward unit normal $\mathbf{n}$,The divergence theorem makes their total sum zero for a body described entirely by bound dipoles. Uniform polarization gives no interior volume charge but generally gives opposite surface charges on different faces.

In a linear isotropic dielectric, $\mathbf{P}={ϵ}_0{\chi }_e\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{P}=ϵ\mathbf{E}$. Gauss's law becomes $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}={\rho }_f$, separating free from bound charge. Across a static interface, tangential electric field is continuous, while the normal displacement jumps by the free surface charge. Polarization charges alter the internal field, as in the dielectric cylinder calculation. Molecular distortion and orientation contribute differently, and response can depend on temperature and frequency. Bound charge is a redistribution of material charge, not an additional free-charge reservoir.

For distributed inductance $L$ and capacitance $C$, a small segment obeys $V_z=-L{I}_t$ and $I_z=-C{V}_t$. Differentiation gives $V_{zz}=LC{V}_{tt}$ and $I_{zz}=LC{I}_{tt}$. For a forward wave,A backward voltage wave has current $I^{-}=-V^{-}/Z$. This sign matters at an impedance discontinuity.

The source figure is the stacked-strip parallel-plate transmission line geometry, despite its use of the word coplanar. Gauss's law gives $C={ϵ}_0{ϵ}_{r}a/d$. Opposite surface currents give magnetic field $B={\mu }_{0}I/a$ between the strips by Ampère's law; the magnetic flux per unit length is $Bd$, hence $L=Bd/I={\mu }_{0}d/a$. ThereforeNo numerical $a/d$ is given; the impedance is appropriately left in terms of that ratio. The line is taken to be nonmagnetic and lossless.

Increasing the gap by $\alpha$ changes $L$ to $\alpha L$ and $C$ to $C/\alpha$, so $Z_2=\alpha Z_1$ while $v$ is unchanged. voltage and current continuity at the step giveConsequently the voltage and energy-flux transmission coefficients areHere amplitudes are peak voltage amplitudes, with mean power $|V{|}^2/(2Z)$. The reciprocal gaps have $r_V(1/\alpha )=-r_V(\alpha )$: equal reflected energy but opposite voltage phase. A voltage transmission coefficient above one does not imply energy gain.

For a finite impedance section of a transmission line, put $\ell =l_2-l_1$ and $\delta =\omega \ell /v$. Multiple reflections inside the altered section interfere. Summing their geometric series, relative to the first boundary,Transmission is unity at $\delta =n\pi$ and minimal at $\delta =(n+1/2)\pi$, with minima $4{\alpha }^2/(1+{\alpha }^2{)}^2$. Resonances are separated by $\Delta f=v/(2\ell )$; the long-wavelength limit also transmits fully. Matching the far termination removes end echoes, not the two internal reflections.

For a smooth isolated conducting sphere, Gauss's law gives the surface electric field $E_s=Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{a}^2)$ and electric potential $V=Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}a)=a{E}_s$. At the specified dielectric strength, $V_{\max }=3.0\times 10^3\mathrm{V}$. The capacitance of an isolated conducting sphere is $C=4\pi {ϵ}_{0}a$, so its capacitor energy isThis is the ideal breakdown-limited energy of a conducting sphere, taking air's permittivity approximately equal to vacuum permittivity and neglecting nearby objects and surface irregularities. The vacuum permittivity used numerically is $8.8542\times 10^{-12}\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$.^[ref]

Displacement current makes Ampère's law compatible with charge conservation. The macroscopic Maxwell equations areTaking the divergence of the last equation and using Gauss's law gives $\nabla \cdot {\mathbf{J}}_f+{\partial }_t{\rho }_f=0$. Omitting ${\partial }_t\mathbf{D}$ would wrongly require the conduction current to be divergence free during charging. The displacement-current density ${\partial }_t\mathbf{D}$ has current-density units, but need not represent free charges crossing a region.

The surface independence of Ampère circulation during capacitor charging illustrates the need directly. A surface spanning the circuit can cut the wire or pass between the plates. For ideal parallel plates, $Q={ϵ}_{0}AE$ andThe corrected circulation of $\mathbf{H}$ is independent of that surface choice. Free conduction current stops at a plate; displacement current supplies the gap contribution.

In vacuum the two time-dependent curl equations support waves. Taking a curl of Faraday's law in a source-free region yieldsThe corresponding magnetic equation is identical. For a plane wave, $\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{E}=\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{B}=0$ and $\mathbf{B}=\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{E}/\omega$. The fields carry energy through the Poynting flux. Dropping displacement current everywhere would remove these freely propagating solutions.^[ref]

In a metal, conduction and displacement compete. For a uniform ohmic material with ${\mathbf{J}}_f=\sigma \mathbf{E}$, constant $ϵ,\mu$, and transverse waves,Use $e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{r}-i\omega t}$. The dispersion relation and conduction-to-displacement current ratio areWhen $\sigma \gg \omega ϵ$, $k\simeq (1+i)/\delta$ with $\delta =\sqrt{2/(\mu \sigma \omega )}$: fields are screened within a skin depth and energy is dissipated by Joule heating. This quasistatic limit neglects displacement current locally compared with conduction; it does not invalidate the full Maxwell law. At sufficiently high frequency, conductivity and permittivity are frequency dependent, so a constant-$\sigma$ approximation must be replaced by a material model.

In an unmagnetized cold plasma, electron inertia gives a cutoff. With immobile ions and negligible collisions, $m_e\dot{\mathbf{v}}=-e\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{J}=-n_{e}e\mathbf{v}$ give $\sigma (\omega )=i{n}_e{e}^2/(m_e\omega )$. For the transverse wave cutoff in a cold unmagnetized plasma, combining this carrier current with vacuum displacement current givesTransverse waves propagate above ${\omega }_p$ and are evanescent below it. The group velocity is $c\sqrt{1-{\omega }_p^2/{\omega }^2}<c$ even though the phase velocity exceeds $c$. The cold model also has longitudinal charge-density oscillations at ${\omega }_p$, distinct from transverse light waves. Collisions add damping, and pressure or magnetic fields modify these simple dispersions. To avoid carrier-current double counting in effective permittivity, once the carrier response is included in ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ it must not be counted a second time as a separate conductivity. Displacement current therefore connects circuit continuity, vacuum radiation, conductor screening and plasma propagation within one consistent field theory.^[ref]

An electrostatic field calculation begins by specifying the charge information, material response and boundary conditions. In vacuum, prescribed volume and surface electric charge densities can be superposed directly using Coulomb's law. For a volume distribution,Differentiating this electric potential gives the electric field. This is useful for known source distributions, but in the presence of conductors the induced surface electric charge is usually an unknown rather than an independently specified input.

Gauss's law is especially effective when symmetry fixes the direction and magnitude of the electric field on a suitable closed surface. A spherical charge distribution gives a radial field, an infinitely long uniform line gives a cylindrical field, and a uniform infinite sheet gives a planar field. In an arbitrary geometry, the flux law remains true but does not alone determine the pointwise electric field. A multipole expansion is another useful approximation: far from a localized charge distribution, successive monopole, dipole and higher terms separate the effects of total charge and its spatial structure.

For a boundary-value formulation, use the electrostatic equationsThey imply Poisson equation ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-\rho /{ϵ}_0$, or Laplace equation where $\rho =0$. A conductor in electrostatic equilibrium is an equipotential with zero internal electric field. Its exterior normal electric field fixes the surface electric charge through $E_n=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. One must specify whether each conductor is grounded, maintained at a prescribed voltage, or isolated with prescribed total electric charge.

Uniqueness of Poisson equation justifies methods that construct a convenient candidate solution. With fixed boundary electric potential and suitable behaviour at infinity, a solution satisfying the field equation is the solution. With normal-derivative boundary conditions, the source and flux must be compatible, and the electric potential is determined only up to an additive constant.

For example, a point charge $q$ a distance $h$ above a grounded infinite plane has the same upper-half-space electric potential as $q$ and a mirrored image charge $-q$ below it. Their potentials cancel on the plane. The image is a mathematical source in the excluded region, not a second physical charge. Separation of variables similarly constructs solutions suited to rectangular, cylindrical or spherical boundaries; matching coefficients enforces the prescribed boundary data.

In dielectrics, the distinction between total and free charge is essential. In a linear isotropic material,Only where permittivity is constant may this be reduced to ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-{\rho }_f/ϵ$. At an ordinary interface, $\varphi$ and the tangential electric field are continuous, while the jump in normal electric displacement field is the free surface charge. Applying Gauss's law to total charge with ${ϵ}_0$, or its displacement-field form to free charge, gives consistent descriptions; mixing their sources and permittivities does not.

A useful interface example is the image charge at a dielectric interface. If $q$ lies in medium 1, the source-side potential is represented bywhere $r_1$ is distance to the real charge and $r_2$ to its mirrored position. The other-side potential can be written ${\varphi }_2=q_t/(4\pi {ϵ}_2{r}_1)$, where $q_t=2{ϵ}_{2}q/({ϵ}_1+{ϵ}_2)$. Continuity of $\varphi$ and of normal $\mathbf{D}$ fixes both coefficients. The equal-permittivity limit gives no image; the conductor limit ${ϵ}_2\to \infty$ gives $q^{\prime }\to -q$.

For a sphere of radius $a$ and relative permittivity ${ϵ}_r$ in a uniform external electric field ${\mathbf{E}}_0$, matching the spherical solutions gives a uniform internal electric field and an external induced electric dipole moment:This illustrates how a material boundary modifies an otherwise simple applied electric field.

For complex boundaries or spatially varying materials, finite difference methods or the finite element method solve the same boundary value problem numerically. A sound calculation checks its boundary conditions, charge or flux balance and convergence with mesh refinement. The governing equations, source classification and uniqueness argument remain the organizing principles even when an analytic formula is unavailable.

Images and uniqueness. The method of images replaces a conducting boundary by fictitious charges outside the physical field region. Choose them so that the resulting electric potential satisfies the required conductor potentials. The Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem then guarantees the same physical exterior field. For example, a point charge $q$ at height $h$ above a grounded plane has an image $-q$ at height $-h$: the plane is an equipotential at zero, and the charge is attracted toward it by $q^2/(16\pi {\epsilon }_0{h}^2)$. The image is a computational device; the physical conductor carries a continuous induced surface charge density.

Potential of a line. Surround an infinite line charge $\lambda$ by a coaxial Gaussian cylinder of radius $r$ and length $L$. Gauss's law gives $E_r(2\pi rL)=\lambda L/{\epsilon }_0$, hence $E_r=\lambda /(2\pi {\epsilon }_{0}r)$. Integrating $E_r=-dV/dr$ givesWriting an additive constant instead is equivalent. The reference length makes the logarithm dimensionless; an isolated infinite line cannot be assigned a finite zero potential at infinity.

Locating the two lines. Put the grounded plane at $x=0$ and the physical cylinder at $(x,y)=(d,0)$, with axis along $z$ and radius $a<d$. Set $c=\sqrt{d^2-a^2}$, and place line charges $+\lambda$ and $-\lambda$ at $(c,0)$ and $(-c,0)$. If $R_{+}$ and $R_{-}$ are their distances from an observation point, the cylinder-plane image charges giveOn $x=0$, $R_{-}=R_{+}$, so $V=0$. To check the cylinder, define $q=(d+c)/a$. The level set $R_{-}=q{R}_{+}$ is a circle: completing the square givesSince $d^2-c^2=a^2$, its centre is $d$ and radius is $a$. The positive line lies inside the cylinder; the negative line lies behind the plane. There is consequently no fictitious charge in the exterior physical region. A Gaussian contour around the cylinder encloses $+\lambda$ only, so the required physical charge per unit length is also correct. These boundary conditions and the far-field behaviour determine the physical solution by Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem.

Cylinder voltage. The constant distance ratio on the cylinder immediately givesIts capacitance per unit length is $C^{\prime }=2\pi {\epsilon }_0/\mathrm{arcosh}(d/a)$. In the thin-cable limit, $\mathrm{arcosh}(d/a)\simeq \ln (2d/a)$.

Cable attraction. Because the cable is idealized as infinite, the meaningful answer is force per unit length. For $a=0.020\mathrm{m}$, centre height $d\simeq 10\mathrm{m}$ and $V_c=1.1\times 10^4\mathrm{V}$,The electrostatic attraction per unit length of a cylinder above a plane isFor example, this follows without any ambiguity about moving image positions from $F_d=\frac{1}{2}{V}_c^{2}d{C}^{\prime }/dd$ at fixed voltage, including the work of the voltage source. Its sign is negative because capacitance decreases with height. A cable length $L$ experiences approximately $fL$ downward when end effects are negligible. This is the electrostatic contribution only.