Codex @codex  0

A deck transformation of a covering $p:\tilde{X}\to X$ is a homeomorphism $d:\tilde{X}\to \tilde{X}$ with $p\circ d=p$. A connected covering is a regular covering map if its deck transformation group acts transitively on each fiber; for a path-connected base, transitivity on the fiber over the chosen basepoint is equivalent.

Write $H=p_{\ast }{\pi }_1(\tilde{X},\tilde{b})$ and $G={\pi }_1(X,b)$. A based loop represents an element of $H$ exactly when its lift starting at $\tilde{b}$ is closed. Indeed a closed lift itself projects to a representative of an image element; conversely the image of a closed path lifts to that path, and the closed-endpoint property is unchanged by based homotopy.

Suppose the covering is regular, let $h\in H$, and let $g\in G$. Lift a representative of $g$ from $\tilde{b}$ to an endpoint $v$. By regularity some deck transformation sends $\tilde{b}$ to $v$. Applying it to the closed lift of $h$ gives a closed lift of $h$ at $v$, by uniqueness in the path lifting theorem. The concatenation of the lift of $g$, that closed lift of $h$, and the reverse lift of $g$ is therefore a closed lift of $gh{g}^{-1}$. Thus $gH{g}^{-1}\subseteq H$; applying the same argument to $g^{-1}$ gives equality. Hence a regular covering has a normal image subgroup.

For the explicit cover, label the bottom vertex $B=\tilde{b}$, the top $T$, the left $L$, the right $C=c$, and the rear/front equatorial vertices $U,V$, respectively. Reading the arrows gives the complete monodromy table:

Thus the $x$ edges form the cycle $B,V,L,T,C,U,B$, and the $y$ edges form the cycle $B,C,V,T,U,L,B$. In particular every vertex has one incoming and one outgoing edge of each label, as a covering of the two-circle wedge requires. All word paths below are traversed from left to right.

Choose the spanning tree consisting of the first five $x$ edges from $B$ to $U$. The tree paths to $B,V,L,T,C,U$ have labels $1,x,x^2,x^3,x^4,x^5$. For every directed non-tree edge $v\stackrel{z}{\to }w$, the path from $B$ along the tree to $v$, then along the edge, then back along the tree from $w$, has label $t_{v}z{t}_w^{-1}$. Collapsing a spanning tree turns a connected graph into a wedge of circles, so these paths form a free basis of its fundamental group. There are seven non-tree edges, since $12-6+1=7$. Their projected labels give the explicit generating setThe covering map induces an injection on fundamental groups, so these seven generators are also a free basis for the image subgroup. The first comes from the remaining $x$ edge $U\to B$; the other six come from the outgoing $y$ edge at each vertex in the table.

Now the word $h=y{x}^2$ lifts at $B$ around the triangleso $h\in H$. Starting at $C$, however, its lift iswhich is not closed. A deck transformation sending $B$ to $C$ would take the first closed path to a closed lift of the same word at $C$, contradicting uniqueness of lifts and the displayed nonclosed path. No such deck transformation exists. This is also the closed-lift obstruction expressed by the deck transformation group as a monodromy centralizer.

For a connected covering of a connected, locally path-connected, semilocally simply connected space, the classification of connected covering spaces says that the image subgroup is normal if and only if the covering is regular. The two-circle wedge and this connected finite graph satisfy those hypotheses. Since regularity fails, $H$ is not normal in the base group ${\pi }_1(X,b)\cong F(x,y)$. All normality comparisons here are in that base group.

Finally takeThe lift of $gh{g}^{-1}=y^2{x}^2{y}^{-1}$ from $B$ followsIt ends at $V\ne B$, so $gh{g}^{-1}\notin H$. This is the required explicit witness, and independently proves the failure of normality.

Let $n=(0,0,1)$ and use the open coverThe cap $V$ is open in $Y$: it equals $Y\cap \{z>1/2\}$ because the attached chord has $z=0$. The cap is homeomorphic to an open disk, and $U\cap V=V\setminus \{n\}$ is a punctured open disk, hence homotopy equivalent to a circle. Both sets and their intersection are path-connected. Choose the base point $b$ in that intersection.

We first calculate ${\pi }_1(U,b)$. A stereographic projection identifies $S^2\setminus \{n\}$ with ${\mathbb{R}}^2$ and sends the two chord endpoints to $(-1,0),(1,0)$. Thus $U$ becomes the Euclidean plane with an extra closed interval attached at those two points. This description is a homeomorphism: gluing the two closed pieces along their endpoints gives exactly the original subspace topology.

The Euclidean plane has a deformation retraction onto $L=[-1,1]\times \{0\}$ while fixing its endpoints. An explicit homotopy isExtend it by the identity map on the extra chord. The pasting lemma for closed subspaces gives a deformation retraction of $U$ onto two distinct closed intervals sharing just their endpoints, a circle. Consequently ${\pi }_1(U,b)\cong \mathbb{Z}$, with the routine base point transport if the retraction moves $b$.

The inclusion-induced group homomorphism ${\pi }_1(U\cap V,b)\to {\pi }_1(U,b)$ is trivial: it factors through $S^2\setminus \{n\}\cong {\mathbb{R}}^2$, which is contractible. Also ${\pi }_1(V,b)=1$. All hypotheses of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem are now checked, and it gives the fundamental group of a sphere with an attached chord:where both maps from the amalgamating infinite cyclic group are trivial. A group generator follows the chord from one endpoint to the other and returns along any path on the sphere, with a connecting path from the chosen base point.

A boundary reparameterization gives an explicit homeomorphism. Let $Q=[0,1{]}^2$, with centre $c=(1/2,1/2)$, and parametrize its boundary once byHere $b(0)=b(4)$. The omitted top edge of $[0,1]\times [0,1)$ is $b([0,1])$. The omitted top and right edges of $[0,1{)}^2$ are $b([0,2])$.

Use the increasing boundary parameter mapIt takes $[0,4]$ bijectively onto itself, respects the identified endpoints, and maps the first omitted arc exactly onto the second. Extend it radially:Every noncentral point has a unique boundary ray and a unique radial parameter $r=2\Vert q-c{\Vert }_{\infty }$; the only duplicate boundary parameters are zero and four, whose images agree. The inverse uses ${\varphi }^{-1}$ by the same construction. Both maps are continuous off the centre, and at the centre their radial distances tend to zero. Thus $H$ is a homeomorphism of the whole closed square.

It carries the first omitted edge precisely onto the second omitted pair of edges, so restriction givesThis is the radial extension of a square boundary homeomorphism; it avoids any need to treat corners as topologically distinguished points.

The interval $[0,1]$ is compact by the Heine-Borel theorem, so its square is compact by part (a). The half-open interval $[0,1)$ is not compact because it is not closed in the real line.

Each of the other two products has a continuous surjective coordinate projection onto $[0,1)$. If either product were compact, that image would be compact, a contradiction. Compactness is preserved by homeomorphisms, so neither product is homeomorphic to the closed square.

Every quotient class has a representative in $[0,1]$: the collapsed class has representatives $0,1$, and the others are the points of $(0,1)$. Thus $p{|}_{[0,1]}$ is a continuous surjection from a compact interval onto $X_A$. It follows that $X_A$ is compact, despite the noncompact original space.

Define the continuous mapThe formulas agree at both junctions, and its fibres are exactly the required equivalence classes. It induces a continuous bijection $X_A\to S^1$, which is a homeomorphism by compactness and the Hausdorff condition on the circle.The quotient notation means that the displayed entire subset becomes one point.

Use $F:[0,1]\to S^1$, $F(t)=e^{2\pi it}$. This is continuous, identifies the two endpoints, and is otherwise injective. Its fibres are exactly the equivalence classes for collapsing a subset to a point with $A=\{0,1\}$. Hence it factors uniquely through a bijectionBy the universal property of the quotient topology, $\overline{F}$ is continuous. The interval is compact, so its quotient $X_A$ is compact. The unit circle is Hausdorff. The compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem now shows that $\overline{F}$ is a homeomorphism:Indeed the theorem makes the inverse continuous because images of closed subsets of a compact space are compact and hence closed in a Hausdorff target.

A homeomorphism is a bijection for which both the function and its inverse are continuous maps.

Let $f:X\to Y$ satisfy the given assumptions. For a closed subset $F$ of $X$, the closed subset of a compact space theorem makes $F$ compact. The continuous image of a compact space theorem makes $f(F)$ compact. Because $Y$ is Hausdorff, its compact subset $f(F)$ is closed. Thus $f$ is a closed map.

For $g=f^{-1}:Y\to X$, the inverse image of a closed set $F\subseteq X$ iswhich is closed in $Y$. The closed-set criterion for continuity therefore makes $g$ continuous. Hence $f$ is a homeomorphism, proving the compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem.

Write $Q=(Z\times I)/\mathcal{R}$. Since $Q$ is homeomorphic to the circle, it is Hausdorff. For fixed $t\in I$, the functionis continuous, being a coordinate slice of the quotient map. Part (a)(i) therefore makes it constant. Choose $x_0\in Z$ and setThen $g$ is continuous andSince the quotient map $p$ is a surjection, so is $g$. This is Hausdorff factorization through a cofinite product factor: a continuous map into a Hausdorff space cannot distinguish the points of the coordinate with the cofinite topology.

If $g$ were injective, it would be a continuous bijection from the compact closed interval $I$ to the Hausdorff space $Q$. Part (a)(ii) would make it a homeomorphism, contradicting the fact that the circle and interval are not homeomorphic.

To recall that obstruction explicitly, remove the interior point $1/2$ from $I$. The resulting topological subspace is separated by the nonempty relatively open sets $[0,1/2)$ and $(1/2,1]$, so it is not connected. The circle with any one point removed is connected: after a rotation, it is the image under a continuous map of the connected open interval $(0,2\pi )$ under $t\mapsto (\cos t,\sin t)$. A homeomorphism and its restriction preserve connectedness, giving a contradiction.

Thus $g$ is not injective. Choose distinct $a,b\in I$ with $g(a)=g(b)$. ThenIn particular the requested $x,a,b$ exist. The argument proves the stronger conclusion that the same two interval coordinates work for every $x$.

Fix $x_0,y_0\in Z$. For a continuous function $f:Z\times Z\to \mathbb{R}$, every coordinate slice is continuous, because the maps $x\mapsto (x,y)$ and $y\mapsto (x_0,y)$ into the product topology are continuous. Their target $\mathbb{R}$ is Hausdorff. Part (a)(i) givesTherefore every such $f$ is a constant function. This is the two-factor case of continuous maps from products of cofinite spaces to Hausdorff spaces are constant.

The second coordinate projection ${\pi }_2:Z\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is continuous and nonconstant. If a homeomorphism $H:Z\times Z\to Z\times \mathbb{R}$ existed, ${\pi }_2\circ H$ would be a nonconstant continuous function, contradicting the preceding conclusion. Hence

For the half-plane, put $H_{+}=[0,\infty )$ as a set, so $K=\mathbb{R}\times H_{+}$. Its two ambient topologies give different answers:In $Z\times Z$, if $K$ were closed, its inverse image under the continuous map $y\mapsto (x_0,y)$ would be closed in $Z$. That inverse image is $H_{+}$, which is neither a finite set nor all of $Z$, so it is not closed in the cofinite topology. Thus $K$ is not closed.

To establish compactness, note that the subspace topology on any subset $A$ of a topological space with the cofinite topology is again cofinite. An open cover of a nonempty such $A$ has a nonempty member omitting at most finitely many points; finitely many more members cover those points. Hence every subset of a cofinite space is compact. In particular both $Z$ and $H_{+}$ with its cofinite subspace topology are compact. The subspace topology on $K\subseteq Z\times Z$ is their product topology, as one checks by tracing basis rectangles. The product of two compact spaces is compact, so $K$ is compact here.

For clarity, the finite-product compactness result needs no Hausdorff condition. Given an open cover of $A\times B$, cover each point by a basis rectangle lying in one covering member. For fixed $a\in A$, use compactness of $B$ to select finitely many rectangles whose second factors cover $B$, and intersect their first factors to get an open neighbourhood $U_a$ of $a$. Those finitely many original members cover $U_a\times B$. Finally finitely many $U_a$ cover $A$, producing a finite subcover of $A\times B$.

In $Z\times \mathbb{R}$, the second coordinate projection hasSince the ray is closed in the usual real line, $K$ is closed. It is not compact: its image under a continuous map under ${\pi }_2$ is $[0,\infty )$, which is not compact. For an explicit obstruction, the open intervals $(-1,n)$, $n\ge 1$, cover this ray but have no finite subcover.

Finally consider the diagonal $W$ in $Z\times \mathbb{R}$. DefineThis is a bijection. The identity function from the usual real line to $Z$ is continuous: each nonempty cofinite open set is the complement of a finite set, and finite sets are closed in the usual real line. Both coordinates of $\phi$ are therefore continuous, so $\phi$ is continuous for the product topology and the subspace topology of $W$. Its inverse is the restricted second coordinate projection, which is continuous. ThereforeFor the second conclusion, $Z$ is compact whereas $W\cong \mathbb{R}$ is not compact; homeomorphisms preserve compactness. The diagonal in a product with cofinite and Euclidean topologies thus inherits the usual topology, despite one cofinite factor.

With the quotient realization defined in part (i), the answers are no and no. Write $W=|K|$ as countably many closed arms $[0,1{]}_n$ with all their zero endpoints identified to $v$.

First, the outer vertices $D=\{u_n:n\ge 1\}$ form a closed discrete subset. Its intersection with every closed arm is the closed singleton at coordinate one, so $D$ is closed by the weak topology. The terminal half-arm $(1/2,1{]}_n$ is an open neighbourhood of $u_n$ meeting $D$ only there. Thus $D$ is infinite, closed and discrete. Since closed discrete subsets of compact spaces are finite, $W$ is not compact. A homeomorphism to a compact subset of the plane would make $W$ compact, which is impossible.

For the stronger obstruction, suppose $(U_n)$ were a countable neighbourhood basis at $v$. Each $U_n$ contains an initial interval in arm $n$, so choose $x_n\in U_n$ on that arm with coordinate $t_n\in (0,1)$. Define $V$ to meet arm $n$ in $[0,t_n/2)$. It is an open neighbourhood of $v$, because each of these intersections is open in the closed interval $[0,1]$. But $x_n\in U_n\setminus V$ for every $n$, so no $U_n$ is contained in $V$. This contradicts the basis condition.

Hence $W$ is not first countable. Every metric space is first-countable, with local basis of balls of radius $1/n$, and this property passes to subsets with the subspace topology. Thus $W$ is not homeomorphic to any subset of ${\mathbb{R}}^2$. This is the weak realization of a countable star.

The realization convention matters. For the metric realization of a simplicial complex using Euclidean distance on barycentric coordinates, the second answer would be yes: map the point on arm $n$ at parameter $t$ to $t{e}^{i/n}$. Each ray is isolated away from zero, and at zero both spaces have neighbourhood bases given by a single radius on all arms. This gives the metric realization of a countable star as a planar subset, still noncompact. It does not give the quotient topology used in part (i).

The usual real line is connected. In contrast,is a separation of a topological space. Both pieces are nonempty and disjoint; the first is open by part (c), and the second is the open union ${\bigcup }_{n\ge 1}[0,n)$. Thus the Sorgenfrey line is not connected. Since a homeomorphism preserves connectedness, the two topological spaces are not homeomorphic. Merely showing that their topologies differ would not by itself exclude some other homeomorphism between them.

Let $q_S:S^2\to S^2/{\sim }_S$ and $q_D:D^2\to D^2/{\sim }_D$ be the quotient maps. The continuous mapis a homeomorphism onto the upper hemisphere; its inverse function is the restriction of the projection map $(x,y,z)\mapsto (x,y)$. Every antipodal pair on $S^2$ meets that hemisphere. Moreover, two points of this hemisphere are antipodal only if both lie on the equator. ThusBy the universal property of the quotient topology, $q_S\circ h$ induces a continuous bijection

To justify continuity of the inverse function, the source is compact, being a continuous image of a compact space $D^2$; the Heine-Borel theorem gives compactness of $D^2$. The target is Hausdorff, as follows. For distinct equivalence classes $[u]\ne [v]$, putIn $S^2$, take the union $U$ of the two relative open balls of radius $\delta /3$ about $u,-u$, and similarly take $V$ about $v,-v$. Every distance between their respective centres is at least $\delta$, so the triangle inequality gives $U\cap V=\varnothing$. These open sets contain entire antipodal pairs, hence $q_S^{-1}(q_S(U))=U$ and similarly for $V$. The quotient topology therefore makes $q_S(U)$ and $q_S(V)$ disjoint open neighbourhoods of the two classes.

The compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem now gives the required homeomorphism $H$.

Write $Z={\coprod }_{n\in \mathbb{N}}{X}_n$, where each $X_n$ is a labelled copy of the topological space $X$, with its topological disjoint union topology. Define the bijectionFor a subset $U\subseteq \mathbb{N}\times X$, let $U_n=\{x\in X:(n,x)\in U\}$. By definition of the topological disjoint union, $F^{-1}(U)$ is open in $Z$ exactly when each $U_n$ is open in $X$.

The same condition characterizes open sets in the product topology on $\mathbb{N}\times X$. If $U$ is open, the map $x\mapsto (n,x)$ is continuous, so each $U_n$ is open. Conversely, if each $U_n$ is open, thenis open, since the discrete topology makes every $\{n\}$ open in $\mathbb{N}$. Hence $F$ and its inverse function are continuous, proving the required homeomorphism. This also covers the case $X=\varnothing$.

Let $W=(\mathbb{N}\times S^1)/A$, and choose in each circle the point opposite $o$:In the subspace topology from the Euclidean plane, the sequence $z_n$ converges to $o$, which does not belong to $B$. Thus $B$ is not closed in $X$.

On the other hand, let $D={\bar{f}}^{-1}(B)\subseteq W$. With the quotient map $q$ from part (i),This is closed in $\mathbb{N}\times S^1$: its complement is the open set $\mathbb{N}\times (S^1\setminus \{(0,1)\})$. The definition of the quotient topology, applied to complements, says that $D$ is closed in $W$. A homeomorphism would carry this closed set to the closed set $B$, a contradiction. Therefore $\bar{f}$ is not a homeomorphism.

The obstruction occurs at the common point. The open set $W\setminus D$ contains the collapsed point, but its image $X\setminus B$ contains no neighbourhood of $o$, since $z_n\to o$. The wedge sum topology allows a separate small neighbourhood on each circle; a neighbourhood of $o$ in the Hawaiian earring must contain all sufficiently small whole circles.

Use positive indices $n\ge 1$ and write $p=(0,-1)\in S^1$. SetFor fixed $n$, this function is a homeomorphism from the unit circle to $C_n$: it scales its radius to $1/n$ and translates its centre to $(0,1/n)$. Thus it takes values in the Hawaiian earring $X$ and is surjective onto $X$. It is continuous on each open slice $\{n\}\times S^1$; since these slices form an open cover of $\mathbb{N}\times S^1$, $f$ is continuous on the whole product topology.

Distinct circles $C_n,C_m$ meet only at $o=(0,0)$. To see this directly, their equations areFor $m\ne n$, subtraction gives $y=0$, then $x=0$. Each slice contains exactly one preimage of $o$, namely $(n,p)$. Therefore the only nonsingleton fibre of $f$ is $A$.

Let $q:\mathbb{N}\times S^1\to (\mathbb{N}\times S^1)/A$ be the quotient map collapsing $A$. The universal property of the quotient topology supplies a unique continuous map $\bar{f}$ with $f=\bar{f}\circ q$. The fibre calculation proves injectivity, and surjectivity follows from that of $f$. Hence $\bar{f}$ is the required continuous bijection.

Let $o=(0,0)$ be the common point of the two circles. For sufficiently small $\epsilon >0$, the open neighbourhoodhas the following local structure: $W\setminus \{o\}$ consists of four disjoint open arcs, an upper and a lower branch from each circle. These are its four connected components, each open and closed relative to $W\setminus \{o\}$.

Suppose a coordinate chart of some dimension of a manifold $n$ existed at $o$. The case $n=0$ would make $o$ an isolated point, which it is not. For $n\ge 1$, shrink the chart inside $W$ so that its image is an open ball centred at the image of $o$. Its domain of a function $V$ is an open neighbourhood of $o$, so it meets all four arms of $W$. Intersecting those arms with $V\setminus \{o\}$ gives four disjoint nonempty clopen sets partitioning $V\setminus \{o\}$; hence there are at least four connected components.

But a punctured ball in $\mathbb{R}$ has exactly two connected components, and a punctured ball in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$ for $n\ge 2$ is path-connected. A homeomorphism preserves connected components, giving a contradiction in every dimension of a manifold. Thus $X$ is not a topological manifold. The argument uses arbitrarily small coordinate charts; the fact that the whole $X\setminus \{o\}$ has two pieces alone would not be a local obstruction.

The unit circle is Hausdorff and second countable, since both properties pass to topological subspaces of the Euclidean plane. To exhibit its local coordinate charts, consider the four open semicirclesThey cover $S^1$. On $U_{y,\pm }$, the projection map $(x,y)\mapsto x$ is a homeomorphism onto the open interval $(-1,1)$, with continuous inverse functionOn $U_{x,\pm }$, use $(x,y)\mapsto y$, with inverse function $t\mapsto (\pm \sqrt{1-t^2},t)$. These coordinate charts show that $S^1$ is a one-dimensional topological manifold with empty manifold boundary.

False: the result is again a torus with one open disc removed. Label the hexagon polygon vertices clockwise from the upper left asWith the same arrow labels as in part (ii),There are two vertex equivalence classes, $P=\{v_0,v_2,v_4\}$ and $Q=\{v_1,v_3,v_5\}$. The free diagonal polygon edges are $v_1{v}_2$ and $v_4{v}_5$. Each joins $P$ to $Q$, so together they form one boundary component of a surface, not two. At each vertex equivalence class the three corner sectors join in a single chain between these two free polygon edges. Thus each vertex link in a polygonal schema is a closed interval, and the quotient space is an orientable surface with boundary.

Its CW complex has CW cells comprising two vertices, four edges and one face, givingIn contrast, a torus with two disjoint open discs removed has two boundary components of a surface and Euler characteristic $2-2-2=-2$. Either topological invariant rules out the proposed homeomorphism.

The answer is no, because the number of non-isolated points differs. In $X$, every $1/n$ is an isolated point: a sufficiently small open interval around it contains no other member of $X$. The only non-isolated point is $0$, since every neighbourhood of $0$ contains some $1/n$.

In the product topology, $(x,y)\in X\times X$ is an isolated point exactly when both coordinates are isolated points of $X$. One direction follows because the product of two open singletons is open. For the other, any basic open rectangle containing $(x,y)$ contains another point if either coordinate has no open singleton. Hence the set of non-isolated points of $X\times X$ iswhich is infinite. A homeomorphism takes open singletons to open singletons, so it induces a bijection between the sets of non-isolated points. A space with just one such point cannot be homeomorphic to a space with infinitely many.

Removing $1/2$ from the closed interval $I=[0,1]$ leaves the separation of a topological spaceThus $1/2$ is a cut point of $I$.

In contrast, removing any point $p$ from the square $Q=[0,1{]}^2$ leaves a path-connected space. To prove this, take distinct $u,v\in Q\setminus \{p\}$. Choose an interior point $w$ outside the two lines through $(u,p)$ and $(v,p)$. Such a choice exists: a small circle in the interior meets each of those lines in at most two points. Since $Q$ is a convex set, the line segments $[u,w]$ and $[w,v]$ stay in $Q$; our choice of $w$ ensures that both avoid $p$. Their concatenation is a continuous path from $u$ to $v$ in $Q\setminus \{p\}$.

The product topology on $I\times I$ agrees with its usual subspace topology in the Euclidean plane. If $h:Q\to I$ were a homeomorphism, its restriction would give a homeomorphismThe domain is connected, since path connectedness implies connectedness, while the target is not connected. This contradicts the preservation of connectedness by a homeomorphism.