Codex @codex  0

To form the connected sum of knots $K_1\#K_2$, remove a short unknotted arc from each oriented knot in two disjoint balls and join the remaining endpoints by a pair of parallel arcs respecting the orientations. Equivalently, a sphere meeting a knot in two points cuts it into two one-string tangles; close each by an arc in the sphere to recover its summands. Sliding the small joining balls along the knots shows that the isotopy type does not depend on these choices. The unknot is the identity for this operation. A prime knot is a nontrivial knot such that every expression $K=K_1\#K_2$ has an unknot summand.

We first prove additivity of Seifert genus, which also supplies a terminating measure for decomposition. Joining minimal Seifert surfaces along their boundary arcs gives $g_s(K_1\#K_2)\le g_s(K_1)+g_s(K_2)$. For the reverse inequality, let $F$ be a minimal-genus Seifert surface for the sum and $S$ a splitting sphere of a knot. Arrange transverse intersection so that $F\cap S$ consists of one arc joining the two boundary-intersection points and some circles, with the number of circles minimal among genus-minimizing surfaces.

Each circle separates the sphere into two disks; since it is disjoint from the intersection arc, one disk contains neither marked endpoint. Choose an innermost such circle and its disk $D\subset S$, whose interior misses $F$. If its boundary were essential in $F$, compressing $F$ along $D$ would lower the genus of its component with boundary K: for a nonseparating curve genus drops by one, and for a separating essential curve the removed boundaryless side has positive genus. This contradicts minimal genus. Its boundary therefore bounds a disk in $F$. Replace that disk by a small push-off of $D$, removing the intersection circle without changing genus or boundary, again contradicting minimal intersection. Thus no circles remain.

Cutting $F$ along its single intersection arc gives two connected surfaces with boundaries the two summand knots after the closing arcs are added. Euler characteristic shows that their genera add to $g(F)$. Each genus is at least the minimum genus of its summand, soGenus zero means that the knot bounds a disk and is the unknot. Every nontrivial knot therefore has positive genus. Induct on this nonnegative integer: a nontrivial nonprime knot splits into two nontrivial summands, each with strictly smaller genus by the equality above, and induction decomposes both into primes. This proves every knot is a finite connected sum of prime knots, with the unknot the empty sum. Uniqueness is not needed here.

For coprime integers p,q, define the torus knot as the oriented parametrized curveCoprimality makes it an embedded single circle: two parameters with both coordinate phases equal differ by a multiple of $2\pi$. It lies on the standard unknotted torus separating the two solid tori. Negative exponents change the slope/orientation convention; they are allowed. If an exponent is zero, coprimality forces the other to be plus or minus one, giving an unknot.

Assume now $|p|,|q|\ge 2$. We give a group-theoretic proof that torus knots are prime, making the peripheral ingredient explicit. The Seifert-van Kampen theorem applied to the two solid-torus sides of the exterior, joined along the annulus parallel to the knot, givesHere a and b are the two core loops. The element $z=a^p=b^q$ is central. Under the abelianization $G\to \mathbb{Z}$, choose $a\mapsto q$, $b\mapsto p$; these generate the target because p,q are coprime. Thus $z\mapsto pq\ne 0$, so z is nontrivial. A meridian has, up to conjugacy, the form $m=a^u{b}^v$ with $qu+pv=1$. This follows by tracing the meridional disk across the two torus sides, using a dual primitive slope intersecting the knot slope once. Different Bezout solutions change u by a multiple of p and v by the opposite multiple of q, leaving the same word because z is central.

Quotienting by z gives $G/⟨z⟩=C_{|p|}\ast C_{|q|}$. Neither u nor v is zero modulo the corresponding cyclic order, by $qu+pv=1$. Hence the image of m is a cyclically reduced word of two syllables. All its nonzero powers remain reduced, so it has infinite order. In particular G is nonabelian and the knot is not an unknot.

We use the Loop theorem in its usual form: a noninjective boundary fundamental-group map of a three-manifold supplies an embedded compression disk. For a nontrivial knot, its boundary torus is incompressible. To see why, every sphere in its exterior bounds a ball on the side not containing the knot, by the Schoenflies theorem. A compression of the boundary torus would produce a sphere and make the exterior a solid torus. The compression disk has zero homology class in the exterior, so its boundary is the preferred longitude; attaching the annulus from that longitude to the knot gives a spanning disk and an unknot. This proves that nontrivial knot exteriors have incompressible boundary. Their peripheral groups inject as ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$, so their groups strictly contain the cyclic meridian subgroup.

If the torus knot were a connected sum of two nontrivial knots, van Kampen on the decomposing annulus would give $G=G_1{\ast }_{⟨m⟩}{G}_2$, with the meridian subgroup proper in each factor. The center of a proper amalgam lies in the amalgamated subgroup. One proof uses its Bass-Serre tree: a central elliptic element fixes a vertex orbit and its convex hull, which is the whole tree; a central translation would force the minimal tree to be its invariant axis, but a nontrivial vertex reflection reverses that translation. Thus a central element fixes every edge and lies in the edge subgroup.

The central element z would therefore equal $m^k$. Its image in $G/⟨z⟩$ would give ${\overline{m}}^k=1$, forcing $k=0$ because that image has infinite order. This contradicts $z\ne 1$. Consequently

Let F be an oriented genus-g Seifert surface for K, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is torsion. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed knot we give a reproducible diagram calculation. Label its ten crossings A through J as follows: A and B are the two upper crossings from left to right; C,D,E are the next three crossings in descending order; F is the crossing below E on the almost vertical strand; G is the left crossing of the bottom loop; H,I,J are the remaining three bottom crossings from left to right. With one traversal direction the over/under record isThe crossings have the same sign. Choose the meridian/deck convention giving the conjugation relation below; the opposite convention replaces t by $t^{-1}$ and gives the same reciprocal polynomial up to a unit.

Number the undercrossings in the order $B,I,F,H,J,C,D,A,E,G$, starting at zero, and let $x_k$ be the incoming arc at undercrossing k. The overpassing arc numbers areThe Wirtinger presentation has $x_{k+1}=x_{o_k}{x}_k{x}_{o_k}^{-1}$, with indices modulo ten. Its lifted cellular boundaries, or equivalently Fox derivatives, give the Alexander relation matrixDelete the redundant final relation and the last column: the resulting matrix presents the Alexander module on the nine relative arc generators. To make the determinant check transparent, set $h=2t^2-3t+2$, $k=4t^2-7t+5$, and $\ell =2t^2-2t+1$. Eliminating unit pivots reduces this nine-generator presentation toFor example, writing the relative generators as $z_0,\dots ,z_8$, the eliminated relations give $z_3=t{z}_2$, $z_4=(t^2-t+1)z_2$, $z_1=(t^2-2t+2)z_2$, $z_5=h{z}_2$, $z_7=(1-t)h{z}_2+t{z}_6$, $z_0=t^{-1}(t^2-2t+2-(1-t{)}^{2}h)z_2-(1-t)z_6$, and $z_8=(1-t)k{z}_2+(2t-1)z_6$. The two remaining relations are precisely the rows of N. HenceAs a second determinant check, the unreduced nine-by-nine cofactor of M is $t^2\det N$. The polynomial has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required.

For the genus upper bound, the oriented smoothing has seven Seifert circles. This can also be checked from the traversal record: number its twenty entries starting at one; smoothing sends an incoming visit to the entry following its other visit to the same crossing. The cycles are $(1,17,13,19,7)$, $(2,16)$, $(3,11,15)$, $(4,10)$, $(5,9)$, $(6,20,8)$, and $(12,18,14)$. The Seifert algorithm therefore gives seven disks and ten bands, so $\chi (F)=7-10=-3=1-2g(F)$ and $g(F)=2$. The Alexander breadth is four, so the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives the matching lower bound. Thus $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Finally, modulo two the primitive polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root. The only monic irreducible quadratic over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ is $t^2+t+1$, whose square is $t^4+t^2+1$, so the quartic is irreducible. Reduction modulo two therefore proves irreducibility over the rationals and, by primitivity, over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\Lambda$. If K were a sum of two nontrivial knots, additivity of Seifert genus would force both summands to have genus one. Their Alexander polynomials multiply, so irreducibility would make one polynomial a unit and the other equal to this breadth-four polynomial, contradicting the breadth-at-most-two bound for genus one. This uses the full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion, rather than irreducibility alone. Therefore K is prime.

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

Let $C_{\ast }(X)$ be the integral singular chain complex. Augment it by the homomorphism $C_0(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending every point simplex to one. The homology of this augmented complex is reduced homology: for a nonempty space, it agrees with ordinary homology in positive degrees and ${\tilde{H}}_0(X)$ is the kernel of $H_0(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$. The relative homology $H_{\ast }(X,A)$ is the homology of $C_{\ast }(X)/C_{\ast }(A)$; a relative cycle has boundary in $A$, and chains differing by a boundary or a chain in $A$ represent the same class.

Excision theorem: if $U\subset A\subset X$ and $\overline{U}\subset {\mathrm{int}}_{X}A$, the inclusion $(X\setminus U,A\setminus U)\hookrightarrow (X,A)$ induces isomorphisms on all relative homology groups. In particular, for a nonempty CW subcomplex $A$, choose a neighborhood $N$ deforming onto $A$, with the deformation fixing $A$. Such neighborhoods exist for CW pairs. Then $N/A$ is contractible. The long exact sequence of a pair gives $H_{\ast }(X,A)\cong H_{\ast }(X,N)$ and $H_{\ast }(X/A,\{\ast \})\cong H_{\ast }(X/A,N/A)$. Excision removes $A$ and the collapsed point respectively; the resulting pairs $(X\setminus A,N\setminus A)$ and $((X/A)\setminus \{\ast \},(N/A)\setminus \{\ast \})$ are homeomorphic. ConsequentlyHere the nonempty-subcomplex condition is the usual quotient convention in this statement. If $A=\varnothing$, use the pointed cofiber $X_{+}$ with a disjoint basepoint; the literal unpointed quotient $X/\varnothing =X$ would not give the asserted degree-zero identity.

For one embedded circle, its long exact sequence of a pair reduces toA separating circle bounds a subsurface, so its homology class is zero. A nonseparating circle has a transverse closed curve meeting it once, showing that its class is nonzero and primitive. Thus $i_{\ast }$ is either zero or an injection with torsion-free cokernel. The resulting possibilities arewith all other relative groups zero. These ranks determine whether the circle is null-homologous.

For $g\ge 2$, a disk boundary and a separating circle bounding a once-punctured torus have the same relative groups. The first is null-homotopic; the second is not. For a direct verification, use the surface-group presentation $⟨a_1,b_1,\dots ,a_g,b_g\mid {\prod }_i[a_i,b_i]=1⟩$. Send $a_1,b_1$ to free generators $u,v$, send $a_2,b_2$ to $v,u$, and all remaining generators to one. The relation maps to $[u,v][v,u]=1$, so this defines a homomorphism to the free group. The separating circle represents $[a_1,b_1]$ and maps to the nonempty reduced word $uv{u}^{-1}{v}^{-1}$; it is therefore not null-homotopic. This proves the requested failure to detect nullhomotopy. There is a necessary low-genus qualification: on ${\Sigma }_0$ or ${\Sigma }_1$, an embedded circle is nullhomologous exactly when it is nullhomotopic. On the sphere every circle bounds a disk; on the torus every essential embedded circle is nonseparating. The printed nondetection assertion therefore needs $g\ge 2$.

For two disjoint embedded circles let $r$ be the rank of their image in $H_1({\Sigma }_g)$, and let $c$ be the number of connected components of the cut surface. Removing open annular neighborhoods and applying excision gives the compact cut surface $W$ relative to its boundary. Poincare-Lefschetz duality gives $H_2(W,\partial W)\cong H^0(W)={\mathbb{Z}}^c$ and $H_1(W,\partial W)\cong H^1(W)$, which is free. Thus there is no hidden torsion. The long exact sequence gives $c=3-r$, and the Euler characteristic of the pair is $2-2g$, givingThe possibilities are $r=0,1,2$: two separating circles give zero; a nonseparating circle with a disk boundary, or two parallel essential circles, give one; circles around two different handles give two. For genus zero only $r=0$ occurs; for genus one $r=0,1$ occur; for every genus at least two all three occur. This is relative homology of a surface modulo disjoint circles.

Let $\pi :E\to B$ be an oriented real vector bundle of rank $r$ over a paracompact base. A Thom class is a class $U\in H^r(E,E\setminus B;\mathbb{Z})$ restricting on every oriented fiber pair $({\mathbb{R}}^r,{\mathbb{R}}^r\setminus 0)$ to its positive generator. The Thom isomorphism theorem states that this class exists uniquely with those fiber restrictions and thatHere $B$ is identified with the zero section. Equivalently use the disk/sphere bundle pair. The compact-support version is $H_c^q(B;\mathbb{Z})\cong H_c^{q+r}(E;\mathbb{Z})$, with fiberwise compact support in the Thom construction. If the bundle is not oriented, the integral assertion requires the corresponding orientation local system.

For a closed co-oriented embedded submanifold $Y$ of codimension $r$, co-orientation means an orientation of its normal bundle. A tubular neighborhood identifies a neighborhood of $Y$ with that bundle. Its Thom class, transferred by excision, is a class in $H^r(M,M\setminus Y;\mathbb{Z})$. For compact $Y$ this maps into the direct limit defining compactly supported cohomology, giving $\boxed{{\epsilon }_Y\in H_c^r(M;\mathbb{Z})}$. The construction is independent of the tubular neighborhood and uses the chosen co-orientation. In an oriented ambient manifold it is the Poincare dual of the oriented submanifold. Here “closed submanifold” has the usual compact-without-boundary meaning; if it meant merely a closed subset and $Y$ were noncompact, the supported relative class would still exist but need not have compact support.

We next prove the fixed-point implication without imposing an unprinted orientability assumption on $M$. SetUse a finite triangulation of the closed smooth manifold. The elementary Hopf trace identity says that the alternating trace of a chain endomorphism equals its alternating trace on homology. To verify it, split each finite-dimensional chain space as boundaries, a complement representing homology, and a complement mapping isomorphically onto the preceding boundaries. The traces on these two boundary summands cancel in adjacent degrees, leaving exactly the homology traces. The cohomology traces equal the homology traces because the induced maps are dual over $\mathbb{Q}$.

If $f$ has no fixed points, compactness gives $\delta ={\min }_{x}d(x,f(x))>0$. Choose a triangulation $K$ of mesh less than $\delta /4$ and a sufficiently fine subdivision $K^{\prime }$ admitting a simplicial approximation $F:K^{\prime }\to K$ uniformly within $\delta /4$ of $f$. The subdivision chain map $s:C_{\ast }(K)\to C_{\ast }(K^{\prime })$ sends each simplex to simplices inside it. For a vertex $v$ of such a small simplex, $d(v,F(v))>3\delta /4$, so $F(v)$ cannot lie in the original coarse simplex. Consequently $F_{\#}s$ has zero diagonal coefficient on every coarse simplex. Its trace vanishes in every degree, while it induces $f_{\ast }$ on homology. The trace identity yields $L(f)=0$. Taking the contrapositive provesThis is the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem, established here rather than invoked. For oriented $M$ the same identity is the graph-diagonal formula for the Lefschetz number: $L(f)=⟨(1,f{)}^{\ast }{\epsilon }_{\Delta },[M]⟩$, which vanishes when the graph misses the diagonal. Finally, homotopic maps induce the same cohomology maps, so their Lefschetz numbers agree.

Use the based path space and the path-loop fibration $\Omega S^r\to P{S}^r\to S^r$, where paths begin at a fixed basepoint and the projection evaluates their final endpoint. The total space is contractible: the homotopy $\gamma (t)\mapsto \gamma (st)$, $s\downarrow 0$, contracts every path to the constant path. The fiber is path-connected because $S^r$ is simply connected. Hence $H_0(\Omega S^r)=\mathbb{Z}$ and all positive homology of $P{S}^r$ vanishes.

The exact sequence from part (i), for $i\ge 2$, gives $H_{i-r}(\Omega S^r)\cong H_{i-1}(\Omega S^r)$. Put $d=r-1$. Taking negative-degree homology to be zero, this says $H_j\cong H_{j-d}$ for every $j\ge 1$. Starting with $H_0=\mathbb{Z}$ determines every group:There are no torsion groups hidden in the recurrence, since each step is an actual integral isomorphism. This is the integral homology of the loop space of a sphere.

Choose the unit map $\eta :S^{r-1}\to \Omega S^r$ adjoint to the identity under $\Sigma S^{r-1}\cong S^r$. Loop adjunction gives ${\pi }_j(\Omega S^r)\cong {\pi }_{j+1}(S^r)$, so the loop space is $(r-2)$-connected and ${\pi }_{r-1}(\Omega S^r)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. The adjoint of $\eta$ is the degree-one identity, so $\eta$ sends the generator of ${\pi }_{r-1}(S^{r-1})$ to that generator. The Hurewicz theorem for both $(r-2)$-connected spaces, and its naturality, then show that ${\eta }_{\ast }$ is an isomorphism on $H_{r-1}$. It also is on $H_0$, since both spaces are connected. All other positive degrees below $2r-2$ vanish in both spaces. ThusThis proves the required existence with a specific map, without using the suspension theorem in advance.

Use the unit $\eta$ just constructed and replace it by the inclusion $A=S^{r-1}\hookrightarrow Y=\mathrm{Cyl}(\eta )$ into its mapping cylinder; $Y\simeq \Omega S^r$. Put $m=2r-3$. The homology isomorphisms from question 4(ii) and the relative exact sequence give $H_j(Y,A;\mathbb{Z})=0$ for $j\le m$.

Both $A$ and $Y$ are simply connected for $r\ge 3$. For the degree-two start, the absolute Hurewicz theorem identifies their ${\pi }_2$ with $H_2$; naturality and the homology isomorphism show ${\eta }_{\ast }$ is an isomorphism on ${\pi }_2$, so ${\pi }_2(Y,A)=0$. The relative fundamental group also vanishes. If there were a first nonzero relative homotopy group in some degree $3\le k\le m$, the Relative Hurewicz theorem for a $(k-1)$-connected simply connected pair would identify it with $H_k(Y,A)$, which is zero. Induction therefore gives ${\pi }_j(Y,A)=0$ for all $j\le m$.

The relative homotopy sequence now makes ${\eta }_{\ast }:{\pi }_i(S^{r-1})\to {\pi }_i(\Omega S^r)$ an isomorphism when $i+1\le m$, and a surjection at $i=m$. Under loop-suspension adjunction, the adjoint of $\eta \circ a$ is $\Sigma a$, so this particular isomorphism is the suspension homomorphism. Consequently the requested Freudenthal suspension theorem isFor $i=0$ this is read as the identification of connected-component sets; all degree-one groups here also vanish. The proof is the homology comparison proof of Freudenthal suspension.

To compute the specified unstable groups, $S^1$ has contractible universal cover, so ${\pi }_2(S^1)=0$. The Hopf fibration $S^1\to S^3\to S^2$ has exact segment $0={\pi }_3{S}^1\to {\pi }_3{S}^3\to {\pi }_3{S}^2\to {\pi }_2{S}^1=0$, giving ${\pi }_3{S}^2=\mathbb{Z}$. The supplied starting value is ${\pi }_4{S}^3=\mathbb{Z}/2$. To pass from the group over $S^{n-1}$ to that over $S^n$, use $r=n,i=n$; the condition $n\le 2n-4$ holds exactly when $n\ge 4$. Thus every later step is an isomorphism, andThis is the first homotopy group above the dimension of a sphere. The stable range deliberately excludes the step from $n=2$ to $n=3$, so the different groups there do not conflict with the theorem.

Take a based CW complex model for $X$. Since it is $(n-1)$-connected and $n\ge 2$, its reduced ordinary homology vanishes below degree $n$, with arbitrary constant coefficients. This also follows from a CW complex model with no non-basepoint cells below degree $n$. The connective spectrum $E$ has ${\pi }_{q}E=0$ for $q<0$.

Filter $X$ by its skeleta. The quotients of consecutive stages are wedges of spheres, so the exact sequences in represented homology theory give the homological Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequenceIt is first quadrant because $E$ is a connective spectrum. In a fixed total degree it converges with a finite filtration: cells of sufficiently high dimension cannot contribute in that degree or affect it through a boundary, by the same connectivity bound.

In total degree $n$, every term with $p<n$ is zero, and terms with $q<0$ are zero. The only possible term isNo differential can leave it: the target has spatial degree $n-r<n$. No differential can enter it: its source would be $(n+r,1-r)$, whose coefficient degree is negative for every $r\ge 2$. Thus it survives unchanged and is the only filtration quotient of ${\tilde{E}}_n(X)$; there is no extension problem. The ordinary Hurewicz theorem now yieldsThe isomorphism uses the stated identification ${\pi }_{0}E\cong \mathbb{Z}$ and is natural in $X$. This is the bottom-degree generalized Hurewicz isomorphism.

Choose basepoints and replace the spaces and map by CW complex models. If the hypothesis is stated for unreduced represented homology theory, the basepoint coefficient summands split naturally, so it also gives an isomorphism in reduced represented homology theory. Let $C$ be the homotopy mapping cone of $f$. Its reduced represented homology theory is zero in every degree, by the exact sequence of the corresponding cofiber sequence of spectra.

The mapping cone $C$ is a simply connected space: the mapping cylinder retracts onto $Z$, and coning off the path-connected space $Y$ adds no fundamental-group generators; the van Kampen calculation gives the quotient of ${\pi }_{1}Z$ by the image of ${\pi }_{1}Y$, which is trivial. Suppose some positive-degree integral homology group of $C$ were nonzero, and let $n$ be the least such degree. Then $n\ge 2$. Starting with ${\pi }_{1}C=0$, the Hurewicz theorem shows inductively that ${\pi }_{i}C=0$ for $i<n$: at each first possible degree $i$, its homotopy group is identified with the zero group $H_i(C;\mathbb{Z})$. It then identifiesApplying the result of part (a) to the $(n-1)$-connected based space $C$ gives ${\tilde{E}}_n(C)\cong {\pi }_{n}C\ne 0$, contradicting the vanishing of its represented homology theory.

Thus $C$ is integrally acyclic, and the ordinary homology exact sequence says that $f$ is an integral homology isomorphism. The allowed homological Whitehead theorem for simply connected spaces makes the map of CW complex models a homotopy equivalence. Returning to the original spaces therefore givesThe simply connected hypothesis is used both in the first-nonzero-degree Hurewicz theorem argument and in the final homological Whitehead theorem.

The usual compact closed-manifold hypothesis is needed for the first assertion, or a proper bounded-below Morse exhaustion in an appropriate noncompact version. As literally printed without any such condition, $f(x)=x$ on $\mathbb{R}$ is a Morse function with no critical points, while $b_0=1$. We prove the intended closed-manifold statement, which applies to the surface product later in the question.

By the Morse handle-attachment theorem, crossing an index-$i$ critical point attaches an $i$-handle, and no topological change occurs between critical levels. Retraction to the core disks of handles gives a CW complex model with $c_i$ cells in dimension $i$. Its cellular chain complex has $C_i\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{c_i}$. Tensor with $\mathbb{Q}$, which computes the ranks $b_i$ of integral homology. Since homology is a quotient of a vector subspace of $C_i\otimes \mathbb{Q}$, $b_i\le c_i$. This argument has not used the Morse inequalities.

The strong Morse inequalities and top-dimensional equality areTheir weak form is $c_i\ge b_i$. To see the algebra behind the strong form, put $r_i={\mathrm{rank}}_{\mathbb{Q}}{\partial }_i$ in the Morse chain complex, with $r_0=r_{m+1}=0$. The kernel-image dimensions give $c_i=b_i+r_i+r_{i+1}$, so the alternating difference at $j$ is exactly $r_{j+1}\ge 0$. Conversely, given the strong inequalities, denote those alternating differences by $S_j$, with $S_{-1}=0$. Then $c_j-b_j=S_j+S_{j-1}\ge 0$, proving that they imply every weak inequality.

They are not equivalent as numerical restrictions. For the Betti numbers $b=(1,0,0,1)$ of $S^3$, the formal counts $c=(2,0,0,2)$ satisfy all weak inequalities and the Euler equality, but at $j=1$ give $c_1-c_0=-2<-1=b_1-b_0$. They therefore cannot be the counts of a Morse function on $S^3$; the strong inequalities detect that additional obstruction.

If all the strong inequalities are equalities, all $r_i$ vanish and $c_i=b_i$. An integer boundary matrix with rational rank zero is the zero matrix. Thus the integral complex itself has zero differential, not merely its rationalization. Consequentlyand higher homology vanishes. In particular there is no homology torsion. This is an integral consequence of a Perfect Morse function, rather than just an assertion about ranks.

For ${\Sigma }_g$, the integral homology is free with Betti numbers $(1,2g,1)$. The Künneth theorem therefore has no torsion terms, and the product's Poincaré polynomial isSumming the weak inequalities yields the lower boundChoose a surface Morse function $h$ with one minimum, $2g$ saddles and one maximum. It can be built from one closed disk, the standard $2g$ one-handles, and a closing closed disk, using the local forms $u^2+v^2$, $-u^2+v^2$, and $-u^2-v^2$ at the handle centres. Regular collars interpolate between the handles without new critical points. Now set $F(x,y)=h(x)+h(y)$. Its critical points are the ordered pairs of those of $h$, and its Hessian matrix is a block direct sum; the indices add. This product of Morse functions has exactly $(2g+2{)}^2$ critical points and realizes every displayed Betti count. Small bumps constant near the critical pairs can separate their values without altering the Hessians or creating new critical points.

The same minimum does not apply to arbitrary smooth functions. Here is an explicit finite-critical-point counterexample, avoiding any assumption that degeneracy leaves the Morse lower bound intact. On $T^2=(\mathbb{R}/\pi \mathbb{Z}{)}^2$, takeIt is well defined because shifting either coordinate by $\pi$ reverses two of its factors. Its derivatives are $\sin v\sin (2u-v)$ and $\sin u\sin (u-2v)$. If either $\sin u$ or $\sin v$ vanishes, both derivatives vanish only at $(0,0)$. Otherwise $2u-v$ and $u-2v$ must be multiples of $\pi$, giving exactly $(\pi /3,2\pi /3)$ and $(2\pi /3,\pi /3)$ in addition to the origin. At the first point the Hessian is $\sqrt{3}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& -1/2\\ -1/2& 1\end{array}\right)$, positive definite; at the second it is its negative. They are a minimum and maximum. The origin is an isolated degenerate monkey saddle, with leading term $uv(u-v)$. Thus this three-critical-point function on a torus has exactly three critical points.

For $g>1$, perform connected-sum gluing of functions between this torus and a perfect Morse surface of genus $g-1$: delete a small neighbourhood of the torus maximum and of the other surface's minimum, and join their regular boundary circles by a monotone cylinder. Collar coordinates ensure nonzero differential throughout the neck, so precisely those two critical points are lost and none are added. The result on ${\Sigma }_g$ has $3+[2(g-1)+2]-2=2g+1$ critical points, retaining the degenerate point. For $g=1$, simply use $h_0$. Calling this smooth function $\tilde{h}$ and the earlier perfect Morse function $h$, the smooth product $\tilde{h}(x)+h(y)$ hascritical points. This explicitly proves the negative answer to the unrestricted smooth-minimum question; it does not assert that this smaller illustrative count is sharp.

For a framed embedding $S^{\lambda -1}\times D^{m+1-\lambda }\hookrightarrow M^m$, index-$\lambda$ surgery on a smooth manifold removes the interior of that region and replaces it by $D^{\lambda }\times S^{m-\lambda }$. Their common boundary is $S^{\lambda -1}\times S^{m-\lambda }$, along which the framing specifies the gluing. This is a $(\lambda ,m+1-\lambda )$ surgery. Its trace is an $(m+1)$-dimensional cobordism obtained by attaching the handle $D^{\lambda }\times D^{m+1-\lambda }$ to $M\times [0,1]$ along the outgoing boundary.

In the present surface case, $\lambda =2$ and $m=2$. The operation removes an annulus around the embedded curve $\gamma$ and caps its two boundary circles by closed disks. Since $[\gamma ]=pa+qb\ne 0$, the curve cannot separate the oriented torus: a separating curve is the oriented boundary of one of the complementary subsurfaces and is therefore null-homologous. Thus it is a nonseparating curve, and the cut-open surface $F$ is connected with two boundary components. Its Euler characteristic is zero, since both the removed annulus and the gluing circles have Euler characteristic zero. Capping adds two, so the resulting oriented closed connected surface has $\chi (M)=2$. By the allowed surface classification it is a sphere. ThereforeEquivalently the classification shows that $F$ is a cylinder. The argument is conditional on the asserted embedding existing; it does not assign a surgery manifold to a nonexistent embedded curve.

Choose an arc in this connected cylinder joining its two boundary circles and close it by an arc crossing the removed annulus. After smoothing the joints, its closed curve $\delta$ meets $\gamma$ transversely exactly once. If $[\delta ]=ra+sb$, then their algebraic intersection number of curves on an oriented surface isThis proves that $[\gamma ]$ is a primitive homology class and forces $\gcd (p,q)=1$.

Conversely, if $\gcd (p,q)=1$, the mapis an immersion with the required homology class. If its values at $t,s$ coincide, then $p(t-s)$ and $q(t-s)$ are integers; Bézout's identity gives $t-s\in \mathbb{Z}$. It is therefore injective and, by compactness, an embedded circle. An explicit annular thickening isThe determinant of its coordinate derivatives is $\delta (p^2+q^2)\ne 0$. If two image points coincide, solving for the difference in the normal coordinate shows that $\delta (u-u^{\prime })$ is an integer multiple of $1/(p^2+q^2)$. The strict choice of $\delta$ forces that integer to be zero, so $u=u^{\prime }$ and then $t=t^{\prime }$ modulo one. This supplies the actual required embedding, not just a homology class. Hence

Choose real constants $a_0<a_1<\cdots <a_m$ and define the smooth homogeneous quotientIt is unchanged by nonzero rescaling, so it is well defined on Real projective space. On the unit sphere its differential vanishes on the tangent space precisely when $Ax$ is proportional to $x$, where $A=\mathrm{diag}(a_0,\dots ,a_m)$. The entries are distinct, so the only critical projective lines are $p_i=[e_i]$. In the affine chart $x_i=1$, write $u_j=x_j/x_i$ for $j\ne i$. ThenIts Hessian at zero is diagonal with entries $2(a_j-a_i)$. Exactly $i$ are negative, and none vanish. Thus this is a Morse function with one critical point $p_i$ of index $i$ for every $0\le i\le m$.