Use the isolated nuclear spin Zeeman effect implied by the supplied nuclear magnetic moment, with hyperfine structure neglected. The proton gyromagnetic ratio isThe two spin levels are separated by . Resonant nuclear magnetic resonance therefore requires the Larmor frequency
The duration is a Rabi pi pulse: in a frame rotating with the resonant transverse magnetic field, the spin must rotate through . If denotes the magnitude of a circularly rotating field with the correct sense of rotation, the Rabi angular frequency is . The shortest pulse is then
There is an amplitude convention to specify. If the applied transverse magnetic field is instead the linearly oscillating , its resonant circular component has magnitude . The rotating-wave approximation gives and henceThe wording does not specify this polarization convention, so the two pulse durations should be distinguished. Odd multiples of either shortest Rabi pi pulse also invert the spin within the corresponding ideal model.
The operators associated with the two angular momenta commute with one another, and each squared angular momentum operator commutes with every component of that same angular momentum. Two useful identities areConsequently the two maximal commuting subsets of the displayed collection are
The first set gives the uncoupled eigenbasis . Its eigenvalue is already fixed by . The second gives the coupled eigenbasis for the addition of angular momentum. Its scalar-product eigenvalue is already fixed by . Thus an independent complete set of commuting observables uses four operators in either case; literal maximality within the question's list includes the dependent fifth operator.
For generic nonzero angular momenta, no further listed operator can be added. In particular,is generally nonzero, and . The same obstruction applies to . Their sum commutes because the two commutators cancel.
Write . The shell theorem makes the potential energy of the Electron constant inside the charged spherical shell. Relative to the point-proton Coulomb potential, the perturbation isIt is positive: the finite charge distribution weakens the attraction close to the origin.
The first-order energy correction is the expectation value of this perturbation in the unperturbed hydrogen atom ground state. Integrating its probability density over spherical volume givesFor a proton radius much smaller than the Bohr radius, expand the exponential uniformly over this short interval. The leading integral isSince , the signed fractional change isEquivalently, to leading order: the energy increases and the binding-energy magnitude decreases. This is the finite proton-shell correction to hydrogen ground energy.
If no small-radius expansion is made, the same time-independent perturbation theory integral gives, with ,Its expansion starts with , in agreement with the leading result. The integral is exact for the first-order calculation; it is not an exact solution of the perturbed Schrödinger equation.
A spherical tensor operator of rank transforms under rotation like an angular momentum . The Wigner-Eckart theorem writes its matrix elements asThe reduced matrix element contains the radial and other dynamical information; the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients determine the dependence on the projections. Ratios within a fixed pair of multiplets therefore follow without a radial integral. The angular selection rules include and .
For the position vector, choose the rank-one componentsLet . The stretched Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and one lowering step giveFor example, apply the total angular momentum ladder operator to the stretched state. The result has components with coefficients and , corresponding to lowering the initial angular momentum and the vector component, respectively.
Only the component of contributes to . The operator cannot connect the projections in , so that matrix element vanishes. With the convention above,Thus the requested relative magnitudes and their squared values areThese ratios presume a common nonzero reduced matrix element. The position operator has odd parity, so an electric dipole transition requires opposite-parity multiplets; for one Electron the electric-dipole selection rule also gives . The displayed labels alone do not establish that condition. If the common reduced matrix element vanishes, all three matrix elements vanish and no nonzero ratio can be inferred.
A uniform magnetic field quantizes the transverse cyclotron motion of an Electron. With Electron charge and the Landau gauge for a uniform magnetic field , minimal coupling givesFor an eigenstate of with eigenvalue , this is a quantum harmonic oscillator centered at , with cyclotron frequency . Its Landau levels areThe oscillator width is set by the magnetic length . In three dimensions, the free motion parallel to the magnetic field adds . The Electron spin adds a Zeeman splitting . In a crystal the appropriate band effective mass and effective spin factor replace the free-electron values.
Changing moves the orbit center without changing the energy. In a rectangle , adjacent allowed centers differ by . Requiring the center to lie in the sample gives the degeneracy of a Landau level, per spin,This large state degeneracy, together with the increasing level spacing, rearranges the occupied states as the magnetic field changes. To resolve the Landau levels, thermal broadening and disorder broadening should both be small compared with .
The de Haas-van Alphen effect is an oscillation of magnetization as successive Landau levels pass the Fermi energy. The Shubnikov-de Haas effect is the corresponding oscillation in longitudinal magnetoresistance. For a simple orbit, successive crossings occur periodically in ; the general relation to the extremal orbit area is Onsager quantization. These measurements reveal the geometry and effective masses of a Fermi surface.
In a two-dimensional Electron system, filling an integer number of resolved levels leads to the integer quantum Hall effect, withand very small longitudinal resistivity on a plateau. Disorder localization helps produce finite plateau widths. Cyclotron resonance provides another direct signature: radiation is absorbed at the adjacent-level spacing .
A coherent state is a normalized eigenstate of the annihilation operator, . Expanding in the Fock state eigenbasis gives a recurrence , and wavefunction normalization fixesThe displacement operator therefore shifts the oscillator ground state in phase space. Distinct coherent states are not orthogonal:
The occupation probabilities form a Poisson distribution,For the quantum harmonic oscillator, the expectation values of position and momentum areThe fluctuations equal those of the ground state,Thus the position wavefunction is a displaced Gaussian wave packet that saturates the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Time evolution under preserves this form:The center follows the classical oscillator trajectory while the packet width stays constant. Its mean energy is ; it is generally a superposition of energy eigenstates, rather than a state of definite energy. For , the relative occupation fluctuation is , explaining the classical appearance of a highly excited coherent state.
The Zeeman effect comes from . For an Electron, the orbital and spin magnetic moments are approximately and , respectively. This explains both the sign and the relative factor two in the term linear in . The second term is the spin-orbit interaction: the Electron's motion through the atomic electric field produces a magnetic interaction in its rest frame. The relativistic correction, including Thomas precession, and the radial expectation value are incorporated into . This effective Hamiltonian retains the linear Zeeman splitting and spin-orbit coupling, while omitting diamagnetic and hyperfine structure corrections.
Define the angular momentum ladder operators by and similarly for . Direct expansion givesso adding gives the required scalar product. The off-diagonal terms change and in opposite directions. Consequently commutes with , and remains a good quantum number at every magnetic field.
In the given product eigenbasis, the diagonal matrix elements areFor and , the only off-diagonal couplings are between and , and between and . Each relevant orbital ladder factor is and each spin ladder factor is . Multiplying by gives . ThereforeAll other off-diagonal entries vanish either by the ladder endpoints or by conservation of . This derives every entry of the displayed matrix.
The stretched states have no mixing and yieldThe block is , while the block is . Taking the trace and determinant of each block gives the remaining four energy eigenvalues:The subscripts indicate and the superscripts indicate the upper or lower root. These formulas are the Zeeman spectrum for orbital angular momentum one and remain valid for either sign of .
For the usual ordering , including sodium, the zero-field states follow fromThe quartet lies at and the doublet at , separated by . In a weak magnetic field, the Landé g-factors giveThese label the curves near . In a strong magnetic field, the Paschen-Back effect makes the appropriate approximate labels:for the mixed states, with the stretched-state formulas already exact. The branch connections for areWithin a fixed , the nonzero coupling prevents a crossing; this is an avoided crossing. Curves with different may cross because the Hamiltonian does not couple them.
Exact spin-orbit and Zeeman energies for orbital angular momentum one and positive spin-orbit constant
. Details. For the sodium estimate, the zero-field frequency separation fixesThe lower doublet has shifts . The Sodium D-line Zeeman pattern gives photon-frequency shifts times for D and for D. Thus the highest-frequency D component and lowest-frequency D component approach each other by . Extrapolating the weak-field Zeeman splitting givesso the crossover occurs at a field of order , where and the weak-field approximation is becoming marginal.
The exact eigenvalues refine the estimate within this Hamiltonian. The relevant photon energies, with a common zero-field reference omitted, are and . The corresponding electric dipole transitions have and , respectively. Equating them givesIts positive solution is , hencein the retained model. The crossing is between optical transition frequencies; the participating upper states themselves need not be degenerate.
For elastic scattering by the Yukawa potential, take and use the first Born approximation in the plane-wave normalizationChoose the polar axis along the momentum transfer . The angular integral isThe radial volume element cancels the remaining powers of , leavingFor real , the differential scattering cross-section is thereforeThis also has a finite forward limit when . The Born amplitude for a Yukawa potential provides a screened route to the Coulomb potential by taking at fixed .
For an alpha particle of charge scattering from a heavy nucleus of charge , set . Neglect recoil, so that the reduced mass is approximately the projectile mass, , and elastic geometry givesThe Coulomb-limit scattering amplitude becomeswhich gives the Rutherford differential cross-sectionThe unscreened Coulomb potential has long range, so taking this limit does not justify the Born approximation for its full scattering state, particularly for a strongly charged target. The exact Rutherford scattering amplitude differs by a phase and has the same modulus. Thus the resulting differential scattering cross-section remains applicable to the ideal nonrelativistic Coulomb problem beyond the weak-potential regime.
To relate the detector counts to the atomic number, first compute the number of target atoms per illuminated area. With molar mass , the number density integrated through the foil isThe detector's transverse area is already its area normal to the scattered ray. Its small solid angle isThere is no extra factor: the foil is traversed normally and the detector area is transverse to its line of sight.
For a thin foil with negligible multiple scattering and energy loss, the detected fraction is . Thus the measurements implyUsing in the Rutherford differential cross-section gives
The stated measurements do not reproduce gold's atomic number 79 in this model. The values and units above agree with the original PDF. Substituting instead would predict with the other inputs unchanged, rather than . No stated correction accounts for that discrepancy; forcing the answer to 79 would require changing the data or adding an experimental correction not specified in the problem.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.

