Codex @codex  0

For a small real time displacement $ϵ$, the unitary time evolution operator is $T_t(ϵ)=1-iϵH+O({ϵ}^2)$. The corresponding Heisenberg picture field transformation is conjugation by its inverse:Here a gives $[H,\varphi ]=-i{\partial }_t\varphi$.

Likewise let $T_s(\mathbf{a})=1+i\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{P}+O(|\mathbf{a}{|}^2)$, with the paper's sign for its spatial translation operator. From b,These are precisely the first-order Taylor expansions. Since $H$ and $\mathbf{P}$ commute in this translation-invariant theory, the finite result is

Quantum decoherence arises when different system alternatives correlate with distinguishable environmental states. For an initially uncorrelated state, a measurement-like unitary time evolution can produceTaking the environmental partial trace givesThe environmental overlap suppresses locally observable quantum coherence. Scattered photons, surrounding gas and uncontrolled apparatus variables can carry away such records. The interaction often singles out robust states forming a pointer basis. Decoherence can be much faster than thermal energy relaxation because recording a macroscopic distinction need not transfer much energy.

The overall state can remain pure and evolve unitarily even when the system alone looks like a classical mixture. Discarding environmental information is therefore not, by itself, a proof of fundamental wavefunction collapse or a solution to the definite-outcome measurement problem. A small controlled environment can return coherence, as in the single-qubit environment dephasing model; practical irreversibility arises when recovering the many dispersed records becomes inaccessible. In an interferometer, varying gas pressure or an independently controllable path marker tests the dependence of fringe contrast on this environmental coupling. Quantum computation must suppress or correct such unwanted system–environment entanglement to preserve the intended interference.

Linearity of the detector's unitary time evolution maps the two input branches separately, giving the quantum premeasurement stateIn the ordered tensor product basis $(|\uparrow d_{\uparrow }⟩,|\uparrow d_{\downarrow }⟩,|\downarrow d_{\uparrow }⟩,|\downarrow d_{\downarrow }⟩)$, its pure density matrix isA nonselective projective measurement in the indicated detector basis applies $\rho \mapsto {\sum }_j(I_S\otimes {\Lambda }_j)\rho (I_S\otimes {\Lambda }_j)$, removing the two off-diagonal terms:This is the usual nonselective meaning of von Neumann process 1. It is not equal to the pure projector $|{\Phi }^C⟩⟨{\Phi }^C|$. If “the detector has clicked” means conditioning on an actual up outcome, the normalized postselected state is instead $|\uparrow d_{\uparrow }⟩$, with probability $1/2$. The correlated superposition describes the coherent premeasurement before that selection.

The requested energy eigenvalue is $E_2$. By the Born rule, its probability amplitude is the inner product $c_2=⟨{\psi }_2,\Psi (0)⟩$. Put $u=\pi x/a$ and use $e^{iu}\sin u=\frac{1}{2}\sin 2u+i{\sin }^{2}u$:The first integral is $\pi /2$; the second is zero under $u\mapsto \pi -u$. ThereforeFor the time-independent Hamiltonian operator, expand in its orthonormal basis of energy eigenstates:Unitary time evolution changes $c_2$ to $c_2{e}^{-i{E}_{2}t/\hslash }$, whose modulus is unchanged. Thus the same energy measurement probability holds at every time, even though relative quantum phases and other measurements can change.

The identity ${\cos }^{2}x=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}{e}^{2ix}+\frac{1}{4}{e}^{-2ix}$ gives the momentum eigenstate expansionUsing the orthonormal basis from part (a), the wavefunction normalization isHence $|A|=2/\sqrt{3\pi }$. The wavefunction normalization leaves a global phase free; the positive real choice used in the requested expansion givesThe two nonzero eigenvalues of the momentum operator have the same energy eigenvalue $E_{\star }=2{\hslash }^2/m$. Under unitary time evolution, their coefficients acquire the same dynamical phase. With $\Omega =E_{\star }/\hslash =2\hslash /m$,At $t=0$, $1+\cos (2x)=2{\cos }^{2}x$ recovers the initial wavefunction. Its probability density, useful below, is

The coefficient of the momentum eigenstate ${\psi }_2$ is $e^{-i\Omega t}/\sqrt{6}$. The Born rule therefore gives $\mathrm{Pr}(P=2\hslash )=1/6$. Conditional on this outcome, the projective measurement prepares the post-measurement state $e^{-i\Omega t}{\psi }_2$, equivalent to ${\psi }_2$ up to global phase.

Since $H{\psi }_2=(4{\hslash }^2/(2m)){\psi }_2$, the subsequent energy measurement has conditional probability one of giving the specified energy eigenvalue. The probability for the entire sequence is consequentlyAny intervening unitary time evolution under the same Hamiltonian operator preserves this energy eigenstate, up to global phase.

The ground state is the single energy eigenstate ${\psi }_0$. Its coefficient in the normalized wavefunction is $\sqrt{2/3}$, so the Born rule givesThis probability is independent of $t$ because unitary time evolution changes only the dynamical phases of the energy eigenstates.

Continue with the initial quantum state ${\psi }_1$ from part (ii), and let $\Delta t=T/N$. Conditional on every preceding outcome being $+\hslash /2$, the post-measurement state after each ideal projective measurement is again ${\psi }_1$, up to global phase. Part (ii) therefore gives the same conditional probability ${\cos }^2(\omega \Delta t)$ for each successive outcome. Multiplying these conditional probabilities yields the repeated projective-measurement survival probabilityThis multiplication uses the quantum state reset at each successful projective measurement; the outcomes need not be assumed statistically independent.

For fixed $T$, put $z=\omega T$. The Taylor expansion ${\cos }^{2}u=1-u^2+O(u^4)$ gives the quadratic short-time quantum survival probability. For sufficiently large $N$, taking logarithms givesHere the remainder uses Big O notation. Exponentiating provesThis is the quantum Zeno effect: increasingly frequent ideal projective measurements inhibit the transition away from the initial quantum state. The departure probability in a short interval is quadratic in its duration, so $N$ intervals of duration $T/N$ produce a total leading departure probability proportional to $T^2/N$. Without intervening measurements, the return probability at time $T$ would be ${\cos }^2(\omega T)$. The result concerns obtaining $+\hslash /2$ at every measurement in the ideal limit of instantaneous measurements with unitary time evolution between them.

The initial quantum state is ${\psi }_1$, up to global phase, and ${\psi }_1=({\chi }_{+}+{\chi }_{-})/\sqrt{2}$. Applying unitary time evolution givesSince $J_3{\psi }_1=(\hslash /2){\psi }_1$ and $J_3{\psi }_2=-(\hslash /2){\psi }_2$, the Born rule givesThe other outcome has probability ${\sin }^2(\omega t)$, verifying that the two probabilities sum to one. This is a two-level quantum return probability.

Under unitary time evolution, each energy eigenstate acquires its own dynamical phase. Since $E_2=E_{-2}=E_{\star }$, the wavefunction isAt $t=0$, the identity $1-\cos (2x/R)=2{\sin }^2(x/R)$ recovers the normalized initial wavefunction.

By the Born rule, the probability for a measured energy eigenvalue is the squared norm of the orthogonal projection onto its whole energy eigenspace. ThusEvery other energy eigenvalue has probability zero. These probabilities are independent of $T$: unitary time evolution under the unchanged Hamiltonian operator changes the dynamical phases but not the squared expansion coefficients. The two equal-energy terms describe one measurement outcome.

Put $\tau =t-T$ and retain the global phase from the preceding Lüders rule update. Since $P{\varphi }_n=(\hslash n/R){\varphi }_n$, the same orthonormal basis diagonalizes the new Hamiltonian operator, withIn particular, ${\tilde{E}}_{\pm 2}=E_{\star }+m{s}^2/2\mp 2\hslash s/R$. Applying unitary time evolution from $T$ therefore givesThis is rigid translation from a momentum term in the Hamiltonian: the position probability density moves with velocity $-s$. The plus sign in $x+s\tau$ follows directly from the negative sign of $-sP$. At $\tau =0$ the expression agrees exactly with the preceding post-measurement state.

Diagonalizing the $J_1$ matrix gives the normalized eigenvectorswith eigenvalues $+\hslash ,0,-\hslash$, respectively. The first projective measurement prepares $v_{+}$ up to global phase, regardless of the earlier state, conditional on obtaining $+\hslash$.

The unitary time evolution under $H=\omega J_3$ gives, with $\theta =\omega t$,The probability amplitudes for the second projective measurement areThe Born rule therefore gives the general spin-one transverse measurement after axial precession:At the specified times $t_k=\pi k/\omega$, $\theta =\pi k$, soFor even $k$, the result is certainly $+\hslash$; for odd $k$, it is certainly $-\hslash$. Although zero belongs to the spectrum of the observable, it never occurs at these times. Indeed, for even $k$ the evolved vector is $v_{+}$, while for odd $k$ it is $-v_{-}$, where the minus sign is a global phase.

An apparent collapse is the transition from predicting several possible recorded outcomes to describing a particular recorded result. Whether that transition is a physical discontinuity, a conditional state update or an effective description depends on what the wave function is taken to represent. The practical success of collapse-based calculation does not by itself settle that interpretive question.

The difficulty is exposed by unitary time evolution. An ideal apparatus that reliably measures a basis hasLinearity then makes a superposed input evolve asThis is an entangled state, not automatically one pointer packet or the other. A separate projection rule would instead select one recorded outcome, with Born rule weights, and assign its corresponding conditional state.

Quantum decoherence explains much of the practical appearance of a classical record. Interaction with an environment correlates the packets with nearly orthogonal environment states. The subsystem's reduced density matrix then has very small interference terms between the pointer alternatives. Local experiments on that subsystem approximately agree with a diagonal mixture. But this is an improper mixture: the total state can remain a pure superposition. Taking a partial trace has not selected one term of the total state. Suppression of observable interference and the occurrence of a unique absolute outcome are distinct claims.

There is a measurement problem if one simultaneously insists that the wave function is the complete physical description, that its evolution is universally unitary, and that a measurement has exactly one absolute outcome of the ordinary recorded kind. The ideal model shows why simply applying the same unitary law to a larger apparatus does not make that combination work. Nor does calling collapse a change in knowledge solve the problem for someone who has already taken the wave function to be a complete ontic state.

Different interpretations revise different parts of this package. Bohmian mechanics adds an actual configuration and obtains effective subsystem collapse while the total wave evolves unitarily. The many-worlds interpretation retains the total superposition and treats each record as definite relative to its decohering branch. A stochastic collapse theory instead modifies the physical dynamics. Everett's original proposal explicitly separates his relative-state account from an additional collapse postulate.^[ref]

Thus collapse is not problematic merely because conditional probabilities change when a record is learned. The problem is the status of that record and of the dynamical rule used to describe it. A defensible interpretation must explain when its updating rule is applicable, what makes a record definite in its own ontology, and why the ordinary measurement statistics follow. No appeal to human consciousness is required by the displayed unitary measurement model.

After the quantum quench, hold $H_f$ fixed and evolve without an intervening energy measurement. The unitary time evolution isProjection onto the original $|0⟩$ gives probability amplitude $c^2{e}^{+i{\Delta }_{f}t/(2\hslash )}+s^2{e}^{-i{\Delta }_{f}t/(2\hslash )}$. Squaring its modulus yields the two-level quantum return probabilityTheir sum is one. For $\theta =\pi /3$, the first minimum of $P_0$ is $1/4$ at $t=\pi \hslash /{\Delta }_f$, and the return is complete at $T=2\pi \hslash /{\Delta }_f$. At $\theta =0$ or $\pi$ there is no oscillation, because the initial quantum state is already a final energy eigenstate.

Changing measurement basis reveals the evolving relative quantum phase. Measuring the final energy first instead destroys this quantum coherence between final energy eigenstates in the unconditioned ensemble: its later original-basis return probability is $c^4+s^4=1-\frac{1}{2}{\sin }^2\theta$, equal to $5/8$ for this example. That constant differs from the oscillation of the unmeasured pure state. The work protocol and the oscillation protocol therefore use separate preparations.

For a normalized quantum state $\psi$ and a self-adjoint operator $H$ on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, expand its unitary time evolution:Multiplying by its complex conjugate gives the survival probabilityThe function is even in $t$, so its odd coefficients vanish. The coefficient $(\Delta H{)}^2=⟨H^2⟩-⟨H{⟩}^2$ is the variance of the energy. This quadratic departure yields the quantum Zeno effect when ideal projective measurements repeatedly reset the quantum state.

For a $d$-dimensional unitary operator $V={\sum }_{j=1}^d{e}^{i{\varphi }_j}|v_j⟩⟨v_j|$, a maximally mixed state $I/d$ on its target is the equal mixture of these orthonormal eigenvectors. Therefore quantum phase estimation with register size $L$ produces label $m$ with probabilityThis follows by linearity of unitary time evolution and the Born rule on the spectral mixture. If every eigenphase has an exact $L$-grid label, that label has probability equal to its multiplicity divided by $d$. Otherwise the exact distribution has tails, and the nearest labels are guaranteed only the nearest-integer success bound for quantum phase estimation weighted by the corresponding spectral probabilities.

A quantum quench changes a quantum system's control parameters rapidly and studies the subsequent unitary time evolution. In the ideal sudden limit, write an initial energy eigenstate $|m_i⟩$ using a complete final orthonormal eigenbasis:The Born rule probabilities for a nondegenerate final energy measurement are $|c_n{|}^2$, with ${\sum }_n|c_n{|}^2=1$. For a degenerate energy eigenvalue, sum the probabilities over its orthonormal energy eigenstates. Subsequent relative quantum phases can alter other measurement probabilities even though these final energy populations stay fixed. A quench need not begin in an energy eigenstate; the same expansion applies to any initial pure state.

A quantum time-reversal operator is an antiunitary operator reversing spatial momentum and angular momentum. For a time-reversal-invariant Hamiltonian operator, its conjugation of $i$ makes it intertwine forward and backward unitary time evolution without reversing the energy spectrum. A scalar momentum eigenstate may transform as $\hat{T}|\mathbf{p}⟩=e^{i\chi (\mathbf{p})}|-\mathbf{p}⟩$. With unit-modulus phases and a complete normalized basis, expansion of arbitrary states proves antiunitarity.

For a prepared normalized pure state $|i⟩$ and a final projective measurement onto the normalized state $|f⟩$, unitary time evolution gives the displayed probability, by the Born rule. This depends on the preparation, final measurement, and time-evolution operator; it does not assume a classical Markov chain of transitions.