Codex @codex  0

In mostly-minus signature, adding the boundary term ${\partial }_{\mu }{K}^{\mu }$ with $K^{\mu }=\frac{1}{2}(A_{\nu }{\partial }^{\nu }{A}^{\mu }-A^{\mu }{\partial }_{\nu }{A}^{\nu })$ to the subtracted Feynman gauge density changes ${\tilde{\pi }}^{\mu }=-{\dot{A}}^{\mu }$ to the displayed canonical momenta. For fields with vanishing spatial boundary terms, $\int K^0{d}^{3}x=\int A_0{\partial }_i{A}_i{d}^{3}x$, whose functional derivatives are these momentum shifts. They depend only on coordinates, so $[A_{\mu },{\pi }^{\nu }]=i{\delta }_{\mu }{}^{\nu }{\delta }^3$ is unchanged. The only potentially nonzero mixed momentum bracket is $[{\pi }^0(x),{\pi }^i(y)]=i({\partial }_{y^i}+{\partial }_{x^i}){\delta }^3(x-y)=0$. Thus both density representatives define canonical commutation relations, although their momenta must not be equated componentwise.

For a real sequence $(a_n)$, the partial sum of ${\sum }_{k=1}^{\infty }(a_k-a_{k-1})$ is exactly $a_n-a_0$. Consequently it is a convergent series if and only if $a_n$ has a finite limit $L$, and its sum is $L-a_0$. Cancellation takes place inside each finite partial sum; taking a limit is a separate step.^[ref]

The partial fraction telescoping example has $S_N=N/(3N+1)$ and therefore limit $1/3$. In contrast, let $a_n=(-1{)}^n$. Its first entry is $a_0=1$, so $S_N=(-1{)}^N-1$. The even partial sums are zero and the odd partial sums are negative two. Both finite cancellations are correct, but the sequence has no single limit, giving a divergent series.

It is also essential to keep the two contributions paired. For example, ${\sum }_{k=1}^{\infty }(1/k-1/(k+1))$ is a convergent series with sum one, as its finite partial sum is $1-1/(N+1)$. Writing it instead as ${\sum }_{k=1}^{\infty }1/k-{\sum }_{k=1}^{\infty }1/(k+1)$ asks to subtract two divergent series. The permitted finite cancellation does not define that separate subtraction. Working through partial sums keeps the indices aligned and the operation meaningful.

Integration by parts transfers a derivative from one factor of a product to the other, while keeping an endpoint contribution. Its usefulness comes from choosing which factor becomes simpler when differentiated, and which has an accessible antiderivative. The integral is then replaced by a boundary term minus another integral.

For real continuously differentiable functions $u,v$ on $[a,b]$, the precise definite integral formula isIn the shorter notation, $du=u^{\prime }(x)dx$ and $dv=v^{\prime }(x)dx$, giving $\int udv=uv-\int vdu$ for indefinite integrals, with a constant of integration understood. The product rule says $(uv{)}^{\prime }=u^{\prime }v+u{v}^{\prime }$; the fundamental theorem of calculus turns its integral into the endpoint difference. Thus the formula packages a differentiation rule into a tool for integration.^[ref]

For example, choose $u=x$ and $dv=e^{x}dx$. Then $du=dx$ and $v=e^x$, since the exponential function is its own derivative:The boundary term is $e\approx 2.718282$; the remaining integral is $e-1\approx 1.718282$. Their difference is exactly one. The endpoint product alone would overcount, because its derivative includes $u^{\prime }v=e^x$ as well as the desired $u{v}^{\prime }=x{e}^x$.

In the figure, the area under $(x{e}^x{)}^{\prime }=(1+x)e^x$ is the endpoint contribution $e$. Its lower band has area $e-1$, and its upper band has thickness $x{e}^x$ and area one. This decomposition makes the subtraction visible. The endpoint contribution is a difference of product values; it need not equal the area under either factor separately.

The same choice repeatedly lowers the degree of a polynomial when integrating a polynomial times an exponential function, while choosing $u=\ln x$ gives $\int \ln xdx=x\ln x-x+C$ for $x>0$. More broadly, moving a derivative onto a convenient test function is the mechanism behind a weak derivative. Always evaluate the boundary term: it disappears only when the relevant endpoint values justify doing so, often through a boundary condition.

With the curvature sign convention in which $\delta R_{bc}={\nabla }_c\delta {\Gamma }^a{}_{ba}-{\nabla }_a\delta {\Gamma }^a{}_{bc}$, the inverse-metric variation of $\int \sqrt{-g}\Phi R$ is $\int \sqrt{-g}{E}_{ab}\delta g^{ab}$ plus a boundary term, for a scalar multiplier held fixed in that variation. The Palatini identity expresses the curvature variation as divergences of $\delta \Gamma$. Two integrations by parts move the derivatives onto $\Phi$, yielding the displayed terms. For constant $\Phi$ they vanish. The opposite curvature convention instead has $E_{ab}=\Phi G_{ab}+g_{ab}\square \Phi -{\nabla }_a{\nabla }_b\Phi$.

Although connection coefficients are not tensor components, their variation $C^a{}_{bc}=\delta {\Gamma }^a{}_{bc}$ is tensorial: the difference of affine connections is a tensor. Varying the Levi-Civita connection at fixed coordinates givesIn the paper's curvature sign convention, varying the derivative and quadratic-connection terms and grouping them into covariant derivatives gives the Palatini identityOne may verify the grouping in normal coordinates at a point, where the affine connection vanishes and the expression is just the difference of two partial derivatives; both sides are tensors, so it holds in every coordinate frame. Reversing the definition of the Riemann curvature tensor reverses this identity's right-hand side.

For completeness, put $q_{ab}=\delta g_{ab}$ and $q=g^{ab}{q}_{ab}$. The contracted variation uses $C^a{}_{ba}={\nabla }_{b}q/2$ and $g^{bc}{C}^a{}_{bc}={\nabla }_b{q}^{ab}-{\nabla }^{a}q/2$. After two integrations by parts,up to the discarded boundary term. Substituting $q^{ab}=-\delta g^{ab}$ gives the differentiated-scalar terms in the metric variation of a scalar-curvature coupling.

The Brans-Dicke theory couples a scalar field $\Phi$ to the Ricci scalar. Assume $\Phi \ne 0$, constant $\omega$, matter independent of $\Phi$, and variations of compact support so boundary terms may be discarded. Use the paper's curvature sign convention and signature $(+---)$. Set $X=g^{ab}{\partial }_a\Phi {\partial }_b\Phi$ and $\square \Phi ={\nabla }_a{\nabla }^a\Phi$. Define the stress-energy tensor consistently byThis convention fixes the sign of the matter term.

Vary with respect to $g^{ab}$. The variation of metric volume density contributes $-g_{ab}/2$ times each scalar Lagrangian, while $\delta R=R_{ab}\delta g^{ab}+g^{ab}\delta R_{ab}$. Applying the Palatini identity followed by two rounds of integration by parts gives the metric variation of a scalar-curvature coupling,The differentiated $\Phi$ terms remain because the curvature multiplier is not constant. Varying the kinetic term at fixed $\Phi$ givesCombining these terms with the matter variation, the Euler-Lagrange equation isRaising both free indices reproduces the contravariant form, because ${\nabla }_a{g}_{bc}=0$.

The independent scalar variation givesor $R+\omega {\Phi }^{-2}X-2\omega {\Phi }^{-1}\square \Phi =0$. The trace of the metric tensor equation in four dimensions isMultiplying the scalar equation by $\Phi$ eliminates the same combination $\Phi R+\omega {\Phi }^{-1}X$. Thus the scalar equation of Brans-Dicke theory isAt the degenerate coupling of Brans-Dicke theory, $\omega =-3/2$, the combined equations impose $T=0$ instead; division by $3+2\omega$ is unavailable. If matter depended directly on $\Phi$, its scalar variation would add a source and the displayed scalar equation would change.

The following lettered sections justify the supplied variation identities; they are supporting identities in the PDF, rather than three independent field-equation problems.

A canonical Wess–Zumino model with a cubic superpotential already supplies a microscopic membrane-like object. Choose positive real $\mu ,g$ andThere are two isolated supersymmetric vacua, ${\varphi }_{\pm }=\pm \mu /g$. A planar domain wall has a static scalar profile depending on the transverse coordinate $z=X^3$, with one vacuum at either end. Its energy per unit area isChoosing $\alpha =\arg \Delta W$ gives $T\ge 2|\Delta W|$. The real increasing solution saturates the bound:The tension follows either from integrating $2({\varphi }^{\prime }{)}^2$ or from $W(\mu /g)-W(-\mu /g)=4{\mu }^3/(3g^2)$. This is a supersymmetric domain wall, and the first-order equation also implies the second-order scalar equation. Its thickness is of order $1/\mu$.

The wall breaks transverse translations: changing $z_0$ gives a normalizable scalar zero mode proportional to ${\varphi }^{\prime }(z)$. It also preserves only half the four real supercharges. In the chiral-fermion transformation, $F=-\overline{W^{\prime }}=-{\varphi }^{\prime }$ and the derivative term combine into a rank-half condition on the constant supersymmetry parameter, for example $ϵ=i{\sigma }^3\overline{ϵ}$ in a compatible Weyl convention. The orthogonal two real parameters are broken and generate localized fermion zero modes. One such profile satisfies $({\partial }_z+2g\varphi )f=0$, giving $f\propto {\mathrm{sech}}^2(\mu (z-z_0))$. The scalar and a three-dimensional Majorana fermion therefore form the low-energy wall multiplet. The domain-wall charge in N=1 supersymmetry is a boundary/tensor charge contributing to the extended algebra; the preserved combinations saturate $T=2|\Delta W|$. This avoids falsely applying the unextended particle-algebra argument of Question 3 to a wall with nonzero tension.

Promote the translation collective coordinate to a slowly varying worldvolume field $Y({\xi }^0,{\xi }^1,{\xi }^2)$. At wavelengths long compared with the wall thickness, its leading relativistic geometric action is the Dirac membrane actionIt is invariant under worldvolume reparametrizations and the target Poincaré group. In static gauge $X^i={\xi }^i$, $X^3=Y$, the matrix determinant lemma givesDirectly substituting the leading collective-coordinate profile into the scalar kinetic term gives the same coefficient, since $\int dz({\varphi }^{\prime }{)}^2=T/2$. Target Lorentz symmetry fixes the leading first-derivative nonlinear completion to the invariant area; finite-thickness physics can add higher-curvature terms. The area action is therefore a long-wavelength effective field theory, not an exact replacement for the microscopic wall at arbitrary momenta. Its embedding equation is ${\partial }_i(\sqrt{-h}{h}^{ij}{\partial }_j{X}^m)=0$.

For the four-dimensional supermembrane, extend the embedding to $(X^m(\xi ),{\theta }^{\alpha }(\xi ))$ with a four-real-component Majorana spinor. Pull back the invariant coframe of Question 7:Replacing $\partial X$ by $\Pi$ makes the area term invariant under rigid target supersymmetry, but does not yet give the appropriate fermionic gauge symmetry. Add a Wess-Zumino brane coupling to a superspace three-form potential $C_3$. In one orientation and matching normalization,The supermembrane closed four-form uses the distinct four-dimensional Fierz identity $(C{\gamma }_{mn}{)}_{(\alpha \beta }(C{\gamma }^n{)}_{\gamma \delta )}=0$. Differentiating $G_4$ reduces its coefficient to this symmetric tensor, so $d{G}_4=0$. A local potential therefore exists. Since the curvature is supertranslation invariant, the potential can vary by an exact form; its pullback integral is invariant modulo boundary terms. This is why the three-form $H_3$ of Question 7 is not itself the membrane field strength: integrating a membrane potential requires three-form degree and hence four-form curvature.

The required additional local fermionic gauge invariance is kappa symmetry. Define the worldvolume gamma matrices ${\gamma }_i={\Pi }_i^m{\gamma }_m$ andWith mostly-plus target signature, a local orthonormal worldvolume frame gives ${\Gamma }_{\kappa }={\gamma }_0{\gamma }_1{\gamma }_2$, so ${\Gamma }_{\kappa }^2=1$ and $\mathrm{tr}{\Gamma }_{\kappa }=0$. Thus $(1\pm {\Gamma }_{\kappa })/2$ are rank-two kappa symmetry projectors. The embedding variation gives $\delta {\Pi }_i^m=2i\delta \bar{\theta }{\gamma }^m{\partial }_i\theta$. The area variation is consequently proportional to $-2iT\sqrt{-h}\delta \bar{\theta }{\gamma }^i{\partial }_i\theta$. Contracting the displayed $G_4$ with the fermionic variation and using ${ϵ}^{ijk}{\gamma }_{ij}=2\sqrt{-h}{\Gamma }_{\kappa }{\gamma }^k$ gives the opposite Wess-Zumino contribution with an extra ${\Gamma }_{\kappa }$. Their sum is proportional toFor the boxed kappa variation, $\delta \bar{\theta }=\bar{\kappa }(1+{\Gamma }_{\kappa })$, so it vanishes by $(1+{\Gamma }_{\kappa })(1-{\Gamma }_{\kappa })=0$. Reversing membrane orientation reverses the Wess-Zumino sign and the matching projector. The cancellation fixes the relative charge magnitude to the tension; rigid supersymmetry alone would not fix it.

Worldvolume reparametrizations remove three of the four embedding scalars, leaving one transverse mode. Kappa symmetry removes half the four real embedding spinor components, leaving a two-component three-dimensional Majorana field, whose first-order equation has one on-shell fermionic polarization. The physical worldvolume modes are one scalar and one Majorana fermion, matching the wall zero modes. Without kappa symmetry the fermionic degrees would be doubled. A planar configuration preserves the target supersymmetries that can be compensated by the kappa projector, reproducing the wall's half-supersymmetry condition. This is the four-dimensional effective domain-wall interpretation of a supermembrane, rather than the eleven-dimensional M2-brane particle-content problem.

In the ordinary local two-derivative matter class, the general ungauged supersymmetric action for a chiral superfield isThe Kähler potential $K$ is real, and the superpotential $W$ is a holomorphic function. Adding $f(Z)+\bar{f}(\bar{Z})$ to $K$ changes the action only by a boundary term: full superspace integration of a chiral or antichiral function vanishes modulo that term. This is a Kähler transformation. A positive Kähler metric $G=K_{z\bar{z}}$ is required for a nonsingular positive-norm kinetic term, not just for derivative counting.

To see the differential order, the bosonic component Lagrangian in mostly-plus signature containsThe auxiliary field equation is algebraic: $F=-G^{-1}\overline{W_z}$ on a purely bosonic configuration. It gives the scalar potential $U=G^{-1}|W_z{|}^2$. The scalar equations have at most two spacetime derivatives, the fermion equations from the sigma-model kinetic term have one, and the remaining interaction terms do not raise this order. The fermionic corrections to the auxiliary equation are still algebraic.

For four-dimensional renormalizability, assign engineering dimensions $[Z]=1$, $[d^4\theta ]=2$, and $[d^2\theta ]=1$. Hence, up to a Kähler transformation and a constant field normalization, the restrictions areA mixed higher-degree term in $K$ or a term of degree above three in $W$ introduces a negative-mass-dimension coupling. The constant $w_0$ has no local effect in global supersymmetry, as in the constant superpotential in global supersymmetry.

The boxed general-action statement uses the conventional two-derivative matter interpretation. It is not a classification of all derivative-dependent effective superfield actions by the order of their bosonic equations alone. For example, a scalar Lagrangian quartic in first derivatives still yields a second-order Euler–Lagrange equation, and supersymmetric derivative-dependent interactions can contain such terms. Their auxiliary and fermionic equations require separate checking. This distinction is explicit in the original construction of supersymmetric derivative-dependent scalar actions. Such actions are outside the ordinary $K+W$ class used for the renormalizable answer here.

Assume sufficient smoothness and a regular boundary for the integrations below, with $n$ outward. Put $\delta =w-\varphi$, so $\delta =0$ on $S$. Expanding the Dirichlet energy givesBy Green's first identity, the middle integral isThus the Dirichlet principle follows with an explicit remainder:Equality means $w-\varphi$ is constant on each connected component; its zero boundary value forces that constant to be zero.

Now let $w$ solve the heat equation and set $E(t)={\int }_V|\nabla w{|}^{2}dV$. Differentiation followed by Green's first identity givesUnder time-independent Dirichlet boundary conditions, $w_t=0$ on $S$, while $w_t=\Delta w$ in $V$. ThereforeIf equality holds at a particular time, continuity makes $\Delta w=0$ throughout $V$ at that time. Its boundary values are still $f$, so uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem implies $w=\varphi$. Conversely $w=\varphi$ has $\Delta w=0$ and gives equality. This proves the full equality criterion for Dirichlet energy dissipation for the heat equation.

For the dynamic boundary condition for the heat equation, substitute $w_t=-\alpha {\partial }_{n}w$ directly into the boundary term. The interior equation is unchanged, soThis is Dirichlet energy dissipation with a dynamic heat boundary condition. It remains valid when $\alpha$ vanishes, because no division by $\alpha$ is used. The last part preserves energy monotonicity; its stationary states need not have the earlier prescribed Dirichlet data. For example, with strictly positive $\alpha$ on a connected boundary, a stationary harmonic state has zero outward normal derivative and is constant, as follows by applying Green's first identity to that state itself.

The Polyakov action has independent worldsheet metric ${\gamma }_{ab}$ and embedding fields $X^{\mu }$. Varying the metric before imposing a gauge givesWorldsheet diffeomorphisms and Weyl transformations allow conformal gauge ${\gamma }_{ab}=e^{2\omega }{\eta }_{ab}$ locally. The Weyl factor then cancels out of the classical action, leavingThese are free two-dimensional scalar fields, but the surviving metric equations requireEquivalently, ${\dot{X}}^2+X^{\prime 2}=0$ and $\dot{X}\cdot X^{\prime }=0$. Gauge fixing does not license dropping these Virasoro constraints.

For an ordinary open string, the boundary conditions relate the two chiral sectors. With ${\alpha }_0^{\mu }=\sqrt{2{\alpha }^{\prime }}{k}^{\mu }$, their independent Fourier generators areThe classical oscillator Poisson brackets $\{{\alpha }_m^{\mu },{\alpha }_n^{\nu }\}=-im{\eta }^{\mu \nu }{\delta }_{m+n,0}$ give the classical Virasoro constraint algebraThus they are first-class constraints. In the quantum theory one applies normal ordering to the product and uses $[{\alpha }_m^{\mu },{\alpha }_n^{\nu }]=m{\eta }^{\mu \nu }{\delta }_{m+n,0}$. The oscillator commutator givesFor example, for $m>0$ the extra vacuum term is $(D/2){\sum }_{r=1}^{m-1}r(m-r)=D(m^3-m)/12$. This exhibits the Virasoro central extension rather than concealing it in a classical constraint equation. The matter central charge is $D$; the worldsheet ghost fields have charge $-26$. Quantum consistency sets $D=26$ and the string intercept to one.

In old covariant string quantization the physical-state Virasoro conditions for an open string arePhysical string states are then identified modulo physical null string states. One does not impose both positive and negative generators as annihilation conditions: their central extension would obstruct that prescription. The resulting null-state quotient of a string agrees with the transverse light-cone spectrum at nonzero momentum.

At $N=0$, the oscillator vacuum $|k⟩$ is a single spacetime scalar field with ${\alpha }^{\prime }{M}^2=-1$: the bosonic tachyon. At $N=1$, write $|\Psi ⟩={ϵ}_{\mu }{\alpha }_{-1}^{\mu }|k⟩$. The zero-mode equation gives $k^2=0$, and $L_1$ gives $k\cdot ϵ=0$. The null descendant $L_{-1}|k⟩=\sqrt{2{\alpha }^{\prime }}k\cdot {\alpha }_{-1}|k⟩$ identifies $ϵ\sim ϵ+\lambda k$. This leaves 24 physical polarizations of a massless gauge vector.

At $N=2$, use the level-two open-string polarization decompositionThe mass is $M^2=1/{\alpha }^{\prime }$. The oscillator commutators give all the nontrivial positive-mode conditions:Higher positive modes annihilate this level. To see the quotient explicitly, the 25 transverse-parameter null states $L_{-1}(\xi \cdot {\alpha }_{-1}|k⟩)$, with $k\cdot \xi =0$, shiftThe additional level-two scalar Virasoro null state $(L_{-2}+\frac{3}{2}{L}_{-1}^2)|k⟩$ shiftsSubstitution into the two physical equations verifies the null-state conditions; the second residual is $(D-26)/2$. Because $k$ is timelike, these null shifts span all components of $b$, so choose a representative with $b=0$. The physical conditions then say $k^{\mu }{h}_{\mu \nu }=0$ and $h^{\mu }{}_{\mu }=0$. In the rest frame this is a traceless second-rank tensor in 25 spatial dimensions, with $25\cdot 26/2-1=324$ polarizations. The light-cone basis independently gives $24$ states ${\alpha }_{-2}^i|k⟩$ and $24\cdot 25/2=300$ symmetric states ${\alpha }_{-1}^i{\alpha }_{-1}^j|k⟩$. Hence

For the fermionic extension, an explicit convention prevents ambiguity in the signs. Keep worldsheet signature $(-,+)$ and useTake $\psi =({\psi }_1,{\psi }_2{)}^T$ and the constant parameter $ϵ=({ϵ}_1,{ϵ}_2{)}^T$ to be real Grassmann-odd Majorana components, with $\bar{\psi }={\psi }^T{\rho }^0$. Put ${\partial }_{\pm }={\partial }_{\tau }\pm {\partial }_{\sigma }$. Apart from the common factor $1/(4\pi {\alpha }^{\prime })$, the combined Lagrangian isThe rigid transformations can be writtenor, in components,For the ${ϵ}_2$ part, the bosonic variation is $i{ϵ}_2({\partial }_{+}{\psi }_1\cdot {\partial }_{-}X+{\partial }_{+}X\cdot {\partial }_{-}{\psi }_1)$, while the fermionic variation is $-i{ϵ}_2{\partial }_{-}X\cdot {\partial }_{+}{\psi }_1+i{ϵ}_2{\psi }_1\cdot {\partial }_{+}{\partial }_{-}X$. Anticommuting the constant parameter past the fermion is essential in the second term. The first terms cancel. The other chiral component works in the same way, giving the chiral proof of rigid worldsheet supersymmetryThus the action is invariant off shell up to a boundary term. The transformation is a genuine supersymmetry: on $X$ its commutator for parameters $ϵ,\zeta$ is the translationOn $\psi$ the same translation follows using ${\partial }_{+}{\psi }_1=0$ and ${\partial }_{-}{\psi }_2=0$; the remaining cross terms are proportional to these Dirac equations. This is on-shell closure of rigid worldsheet supersymmetry. On a surface with boundary, compatible endpoint conditions must make the boundary flux vanish. On a compact worldsheet, a constant parameter must preserve the spin structure; the local identity alone does not make a constant transformation compatible with every antiperiodic sector.

The fermions contribute to the worldsheet stress-energy tensor and produce a fermionic superconformal current. In holomorphic normalization with ${\psi }^{\mu }(z){\psi }^{\nu }(w)\sim {\eta }^{\mu \nu }/(z-w)$,The free-field contractions give $G(z)G(w)\sim (2c/3)/(z-w{)}^3+2T(w)/(z-w)$ and conformal weight $3/2$ for $G$, where $c=D+D/2=3D/2$. Consequently the modes obey the N=1 super-Virasoro algebraDropping the central terms gives the classical graded constraint algebra. Integer $r$ gives the Ramond sector; half-integer $r$ gives the Neveu–Schwarz sector. In the displayed conformal-plane convention $G_0^2=L_0-c/24$ in the Ramond sector. Shifting to the Ramond vacuum-normal-ordered zero mode gives the usual Ramond supercurrent zero-mode square $G_0^2=L_0^{(R)}$.

Rigid symmetry of matter already supplies these currents, but promoting their vanishing to new gauge constraints requires coupling to worldsheet supergravity and varying its worldsheet gravitino. In superconformal gauge one retains $T=G=0$. The fermionic current constraints and their physical-state conditions extend the bosonic Virasoro conditions. The ghost charges are $-26+11=-15$, so cancellation with $3D/2$ gives the critical dimension of the RNS superstring $D=10$; the NS and Ramond intercepts are respectively $1/2$ and zero. This distinguishes the global supersymmetry established above from its locally gauged string completion.

The higher-order Euler-Lagrange equation for a functional depending on $h_x$ and $h_{xx}$ givesWith the membrane elastic lengththe general free-membrane profile isTwo integrations by parts, followed by use of the field equation, turn the energy of any free interval $[a,b]$ into the boundary term

Take the undeformed membrane to have $h,h_x\to 0$ at infinity. In the small-contact approximation, the cylindrical profile isContinuity of height and slope at the right contact point and exponential decay then givewith its reflected copy on the left. The two free tails carryWithin the contact, $h_{xx}=-1/R$. Since ${\delta }_o\ll \xi$, the tension contribution there is smaller than the bending contribution by $O({\delta }_o^2/{\xi }^2)$, soWriting the dimensionless adhesion strength as $U=R^2\mathcal{U}/k_c$, the total energy isIts stationary point isIt is an admissible bound state only for $U>1/2$; otherwise the constrained minimum is the unbound state ${\delta }_o=0$. Substitution gives

First expand the variational integrand:Its needed partial derivatives are ${\mathcal{L}}_f=3f^{\prime }+4f$ and ${\mathcal{L}}_{f^{\prime }}=2f^{\prime }+3f-x$. The Euler-Lagrange equation is thereforeThe general solution is $f=A\cosh (\sqrt{2}x)+B\sinh (\sqrt{2}x)-1/4$. Subtracting the two endpoint equations gives $B=0$; adding them gives $A=1/[4\cosh \sqrt{2}]$. HenceThis is the unique stationary solution. It is also the unique global minimizer: after discarding the fixed boundary terms, integration by parts rewrites $I$ as ${\int }_{-1}^1[f^{\prime 2}+2f^2+f-2x^2]dx$. For an endpoint-zero variation $\eta$, the linear part vanishes at the displayed solution andwith equality only for $\eta =0$.

The total derivative contributes only the boundary termThis is fixed by the endpoint data, so its first variation vanishes. It cannot change the Euler-Lagrange equations or which path minimizes $F$.

For a direct check, let $h=g_x\dot{x}+g_y\dot{y}$. ThenThe equality uses commuting mixed partial derivatives. Thus $\boxed{dg/dt\text{ contributes zero to both Euler-Lagrange equations}}$, as in total time derivatives preserve fixed-endpoint Euler-Lagrange equations.

Impose $y=x$ before varying. Writing $\delta ={\delta }_1+{\delta }_2$, the restricted integrand isIts middle term is the total derivative of $\alpha ({\gamma }_1+{\gamma }_2)(x+\beta x^2/2)$, so it can be dropped for fixed endpoints by part (b). The remaining Euler-Lagrange equation is $\delta \ddot{x}=\alpha \beta$. Integrating twice and imposing $x(0)=0$, $x(T)=S$ givesThis is the unique global minimizer among paths on the specified line. To prove it, add any admissible variation $\eta$ with $\eta (0)=\eta (T)=0$. The change in fuel, after dropping the fixed boundary term, isThe first integral vanishes by integration by parts and the equation for $x$. Equality forces $\eta =0$. No monotonicity or restriction to the segment between endpoints was imposed in the question; the minimizing coordinate can initially decrease for sufficiently large $T$.