Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 7 1 f Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The displayed estimate has two independent defects. Even for , its right side cannot use . At , choose nonnegative smooth functions with compact support and prescribe . This is a legitimate transported solution with . The proposed inequality would requireVelocity dilation makes arbitrarily large, while the other factors stay fixed. Thus no universal works with the same-time mixed Lebesgue norm.
There is a second issue after replacing by : the Jacobian determinant bounds give a local diffeomorphism, not necessarily a one-to-one map. Suppose additionally that is injective. With , the change of variables formula and giveSurjectivity is not needed because the domain of integration can be enlarged. With injectivity, the corrected estimate has . The upper bound is unnecessary.
More generally, dispersion with a nonlinear velocity map uses the area formula to sum over inverse branches. Define the weighted inverse multiplicityIf , the same argument gives the corrected estimate with . At most inverse branches give . Thus the missing global assumption concerns multiplicity, not merely local volume distortion.
For a noninjective map with constant Jacobian determinant giving a counterexample in two dimensions, write and setThe polar coordinates calculation gives , yet for every integer . To turn this into a failure of the estimate, take a small open disk about that avoids the origin. For each of inverse branches over , choose a smooth cutoff supported on that branch, where has support strictly inside and is extended by zero. These velocity supports are disjoint. SetThen , independent of , whereas at a fixed and suitable ,The last integral is positive and independent of . No finite exists for this fixed , although . In one dimension, by contrast, a nonvanishing derivative has a constant sign, so the lower derivative bound makes a global diffeomorphism.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 7 2 g Solution 2026-10-07
For smooth vorticity, parts (b)--(c) and the transport equation give and measure preservation. The change of variables formula therefore conserves and . Parts (d)--(e) give a uniformly bounded velocity and a uniform log-Lipschitz modulus; applying the time-dependent version of part (f) constructs unique global characteristic curves.
For a rough Yudovich characteristic flow, state the needed temporal hypothesis explicitly:The usual weak Euler solution class provides these conditions and the initial time trace. On , put . The velocity bounds are and , with integrable on this interval.
For completeness, mollify spatially. The resulting smooth velocities have trajectories and obey the same speed and modulus bounds, up to one common constant. Their speeds have the integrable majorant , giving uniform boundedness and equicontinuity of trajectories. Arzela-Ascoli theorem supplies a uniformly convergent subsequence. The modulus estimate controls , while the spatial mollification error tends to zero with an integrable majorant. Thus the limit solvesReplace by in the Osgood uniqueness criterion proof. It gives uniqueness and prevents finite-time escape. The characteristics are globally uniquely defined for each given Euler solution in the usual Yudovich class. This constructs the flow for a fixed solution; it is not by itself the entire uniqueness proof for the nonlinear Euler equation.
Merely saying that both spatial norms are finite separately at each time does not state the local temporal bound or measurability used in this argument. The printed formulation must be interpreted in the usual solution class, or supplemented with these temporal conditions. Also, an initial datum here is a function of ; the extra time variable in the displayed initial-data space is extraneous.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 ia Paper 3 9C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-07
For a smooth one-to-one coordinate transformation with nonsingular derivative, the Jacobian determinant isLocally a small coordinate box maps, to first order, to a parallelepiped whose volume is the absolute determinant of the derivative times the original volume. Summing these local volume approximations gives the change of variables formula, with accounting for either orientation. The usual regularity and nonsingularity hypotheses are part of this substitution theorem.
The region is the upper half of the spherical shell between radii two and three, including its annular flat boundary in the equatorial plane. Use spherical coordinates , , with , , . Their Jacobian determinant is ; the polar axis and azimuth seam have measure zero, so do not obstruct this integration.
The integrand is . Consequently
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 64 2 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The literal assumptions suffice for the scalar quadratic fidelity problem. One can avoid regularity of level-set boundaries by moving only a clipped part of the minimizer. We prove the stronger jump-amplitude inequality for total variation denoising:Comparison with the zero function gives finite energy and hence . Here , and both differences use the same oriented BV traces on a hypersurface. Reversing the normal reverses both differences and leaves the inequality unchanged. Outside , the two traces of agree, so the inequality would read at a jump of . It therefore gives the requested no-new-jumps property of total variation denoising in every dimension.
First use residual-preserving clipping of an ROF minimizer. For an integer , putThe coarea formula for BV functions gives scalar total variation splitting under clipping:Indeed the levels in contribute to , while the levels outside that interval contribute to . This uses the full signed coarea formula. For any , minimality of and the triangle inequality for the total variation seminorm giveCancel the tail variation. Thus is a bounded ROF denoising minimizer for . The data may still be unbounded. This is an exact reduction preserving ; it does not truncate the data and then pass to a limit of different reconstructions.
We next prove the jump-amplitude inequality for a bounded ROF minimizer, allowing its data to be unbounded. Fix a coordinate , a nonnegative , and let be the local flow of the smooth vector field . The flow is the identity near the domain boundary, preserves each line parallel to , and satisfies . WriteThese maps are diffeomorphisms, with and uniformly.
The useful trace calculation is the BV jump-product limit with one bounded factor. For and ,The right side is integrable: and only the common jump part of contributes. The same limit holds with both increments replaced by their negative-time increments, still dividing by positive .
Here is why this calculation needs only one bounded factor. By the BV slicing theorem, almost every coordinate slice of and has one-sided representatives. On one such interval let and use its right-continuous representative. Since ,Fubini's theorem rewrites the slice integral asAt each interior , the inner expression tends to ; if , it is zero. Its absolute value is at most . Dominated convergence against therefore leaves just the measure atoms common to the two slices. The bound is also integrable over the transverse coordinates, by the BV slicing theorem. Integrating the slice jump sums gives the surface integral and its factor . Negative-time increments give the same product, because both slice differences reverse sign. At no point is a uniform bound on across the slices required.
For , use the mixed competitorsThe total variation under opposite smooth flows satisfiesTo see this for the entire vector Radon measure , the change of variables formula givesFor , the two cofactor matrices expand as , with the same and opposite signs. Their norm expansions on have cancelling linear terms. Integrating proves the estimate, including the absolutely continuous, jump and Cantor parts. The BV transformation formula is also given in Lemma 4.2 on differentiable regularizers; that lemma does not assume bounded data. The total variation seminorm is a convex function, soThus minimality forces the sum of the two fidelity changes to have nonnegative limit after division by .
It remains to evaluate that sum without bounding . Put . Exact expansion of the quadratic fidelity, together with change of variables, gives the opposite-flow fidelity identity for quadratic data:For completeness, the cross-term identity fixing its sign isThe last integral is : , whileTake first, then . Here and the local flow is strongly continuous in . The remaining Jacobian mass term is . This argument avoids multiplying an unbounded fidelity derivative by an uncontrolled derivative measure.
Apply the BV jump-product limit with one bounded factor with and , and use minimality. For every nonnegative and every coordinate ,Let . These are inequalities for finite signed Radon measures, so arbitrary nonnegative smooth tests imply nonnegativity of their densities. Since at least one coordinate of a unit normal is nonzero,This proves the bounded-minimizer lemma with arbitrary data.
Finally return to and . At almost every finite approximate jump point of , choose an integer . The BV traces on a hypersurface commute with clipping, so , and there. It is consequently a jump point of , and its inequality is exactly . A countable union over removes all exceptional surface-null sets. Outside , the BV traces on a hypersurface of agree almost everywhere. We concludeThe mechanism is exact scalar coarea splitting, paired smooth-flow variations, a one-bounded-factor BV trace limit, and localization through integer clipping levels. It works in every dimension under the printed hypotheses, without essential boundedness of or and without regularity of their level-set boundaries.
In total variation calibration notation, . Since this divergence is itself in the BV space, the proved inequality equivalently readsThus an upward output jump forces the appropriate nonpositive jump of the calibrated divergence. This is a consequence of the variational argument above, with common oriented BV traces on a hypersurface; no curvature of the rectifiable interface or differentiability of its normal is assumed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 7 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The derivative of the backward characteristic flow map isThus the change of variables formula preserves phase-space Lebesgue measure. With zero source, , so for every finite ,Taking the th root proves . For this is a quasi-norm, and the argument still works because it uses only a change of variables, not the triangle inequality. The identity also holds in the extended sense when an integral is infinite. Since the flow is bijective and measure-preserving, it additionally preserves the essential supremum, so the same conclusion holds for .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 7 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the genuine planar Givens rotationIn the second component the cosine multiplies : the repeated in the printed formula is an error. With that printed expression, at the pair becomes , which does not preserve length or measure. The rotation-based claims require the corrected expression. Also take , since the normalization by is undefined for .
Let and . The change of variables formula and determinant one give . Thus each is a unitary operator, with adjoint . The Kac collision operator is the averageThe Minkowski integral inequality gives , so is bounded. For the Hilbert space inner product, integration and the angular change giveHence and . In fact a nonzero radial Gaussian function is fixed by every rotation, showing . Angular averages can be understood as strong Bochner integrals; continuity of rotations in follows first for smooth compactly supported functions, then by density.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 2 9F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
Set and . Their inverse change of variables is , , with domain , . The absolute Jacobian determinant of this inverse transformation isUse the independence of random variables to multiply the two original Gamma distribution densities. The change of variables formula then gives the joint probability densityFactor this into two normalized densities:The support is a product domain, and the factors are precisely a Beta distribution density and a Gamma distribution density. ThereforeThis beta-gamma independence uses the common rate ; it is a rate parameter, not the scale parameter .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 3 10C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For a smooth map , the Jacobian determinant is the determinant of its Jacobian matrix . In Einstein summation convention,Differentiate the supplied expression for by the product rule. The term differentiating vanishes because is symmetric in , while is antisymmetric; the term differentiating vanishes similarly. Only differentiation of remains:The last equality follows by the cyclic relabelling , which has positive sign. This proves the Jacobian determinant as a divergence identity.
For a composition , the chain rule givesTaking determinants yieldsFor the first-order perturbation, use spatial derivative control in perturbations of the identity map: the usual smooth-family interpretation gives locally. Multilinearity of the determinant shows that its linear term comes from choosing one column of and all other columns from . This gives the trace:The regularity qualification matters: a pointwise remainder for maps does not by itself give an remainder for spatial derivatives. For instance has a uniform displacement and , but its Jacobian determinant at is for . Thus the first expansion needs the remainder in locally, or an equivalent smoothness assumption on the family.
Under the subsequent group law, is the identity and is the inverse of . Write . Applying the composition formula to and the short-time expansion gives the Jacobian evolution of a smooth flow:HenceIf only the pointwise generator expansion is assumed initially, the group law still gives . Uniqueness and smooth dependence for this smooth ordinary differential equation make it a smooth flow map, thereby justifying the differentiated expansion used above. Thus a divergence-free generator hasBy the change of variables formula, these maps preserve ordinary Euclidean volume and orientation. This is the Euclidean instance of a volume-preserving vector field.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 304 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Fix the measure conventions before evaluating this zero-dimensional supersymmetric field theory. Take to mean ordinary positive area measure , and choose Berezin integration orientations with . A different overall measure normalization multiplies all the unnormalized answers by the same constant. Assume , so at infinity and all polynomial insertions converge. An affine or constant does not give this confining integral and is outside this convergence hypothesis.
The Grassmann variables truncate the fermionic exponential. The coefficient of is , so the partition function becomesThe Jacobian determinant of the holomorphic map is . Away from its finitely many critical values, a polynomial of polynomial degree has preimages counted with multiplicity. The change of variables formula therefore givesCritical values form a set of area zero and do not affect the integral. This partition function measures the covering degree, even when some zeros of are repeated.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 308 2 Solution 2026-10-06
Orient both spheres in the standard way and normalize their area forms to total area . The degree of a map between oriented manifolds can be obtained in two ways. For a regular value , use the degree as a sum of local degrees:Each inverse image is isolated by the inverse function theorem, and compactness makes the set finite. The determinant is computed in consistently oriented local coordinates. A second method is spherical degree by area pullback:where the last formula represents as a unit vector in . The pullback of a differential form already contains the signed Jacobian determinant; no extra is to be inserted in that last coordinate expression.
To relate the methods, replace by a smooth top-degree differential form with the same total integral supported in a small neighbourhood of a regular value. Two such top-degree forms with equal integral differ by an exact differential form on , by its top-degree de Rham cohomology. Their pullbacks therefore have the same integral by Stokes theorem. Over the chosen neighbourhood, splits into local inverse branches; the change of variables formula makes the contribution of each branch its orientation sign times . Their sum is precisely the first formula. Thus the area integral is an integer and agrees with the signed inverse-image count.
For a nonconstant rational map, first use common-factor reduction of a rational map so and are coprime. Write for these reduced polynomials. A generic finite target value has inverse images at the roots of : avoiding exceptional values makes its degree and its roots simple. The fundamental theorem of algebra supplies roots. A holomorphic map has positive real Jacobian determinant at a regular point, so every local sign is . HenceThe source leaves coprimality implicit. In an unreduced representation the answer is , including degree zero for a constant reduced map. For example extends to and has degree one, although the unreduced maximum degree is two. Exceptional inverse images at infinity or multiple roots do not change the degree of a rational map of the Riemann sphere.
For the rational map approximation for Skyrmions, use stereographic projection and the unit target vectorCombine this rational map with a radial profile to form a special unitary group field:where are the Pauli matrices. The endpoint values make independent of angle and . Appropriate radial behaviour gives an admissible finite-energy field configuration. With , choose the topological baryon number in the Skyrme model conventionSeparating the radial and angular factors givesThus the degree of a rational map of the Riemann sphere supplies the Skyrmion charge.
In conventional dimensionless massless Skyrme model units, its static energy reduces towith the angular Jacobian of a rational mapThe Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives . These formulas follow from the radial strain and the two equal angular strains : the quadratic energy sums their squares and the quartic Skyrme term sums their pairwise products of squares. Minimize the angular integral in the rational map approximation over degree- maps, then minimize the remaining radial energy with the stated endpoints. This replaces a three-dimensional field minimization by finitely many map coefficients and an ordinary differential equation for .
The method constructs a charge- variational approximation, with topology built in and with rotational symmetry of a rational map translated into combined spatial and isospin rotations. It is efficient for identifying shapes and providing initial data for unrestricted numerical relaxation. Its restrictions are equally concrete: it uses one radial profile and a holomorphic angular map independent of radius, so it cannot represent arbitrary radial-angular correlations, separated clusters, or all deformations. Apart from the degree-one Skyrmion hedgehog ansatz, it generally does not solve the full field equation exactly. Massive-pion terms can be included in the radial functional but do not remove these restrictions, and multi-shell or unrestricted fields may be needed for larger charges. Approximate energy minima and a final collective-coordinate quantization are distinct steps.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ia Paper 3 3B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
The boundary ray has , and its intersection with the hyperbola is . Under the given change of variables, and . Thus the region becomesThe hyperbolic functions satisfy , so the Jacobian determinant isIt is positive in the interior. The coordinate degeneracy at is a boundary set of area zero and does not affect the change of variables formula. ThereforeHere . The PDF specifies two line segments and one hyperbolic arc; the duplicated line in the TeX is not an extra boundary condition.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 132 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
In local holomorphic coordinates, write the two positive singular values of as . Preservation of orientation gives , and quasiconformality gives .
For an admissible conformal metric on , define a density on by . Along each path,so . The change of variables formula and giveAlso , so . Thus has positive finite area and is admissible, andTaking the supremum over provesApplying the same argument to , which has the same bound on its maximal dilatation, also gives . The inequalities remain valid for extended extremal lengths; no extremizing density need exist.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 203 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For real smooth functions of compact support in a planar domain , use the Dirichlet inner productChanging the positive normalization factor does not change orthogonality. For complex functions, insert complex conjugation in the second factor to obtain the corresponding Hermitian form.
Let be a conformal bijection, and let be smooth functions of compact support on . Its real Jacobian matrix is , where is a rotation. By the chain rule,The change of variables formula has Jacobian determinant , so this factor cancels:This proves conformal invariance of the planar Dirichlet inner product. By completion it is also an isometry between the corresponding Dirichlet energy spaces. It asserts invariance of the energy form, not of the inhomogeneous Sobolev norm, whose term has a different transformation rule.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ii Paper 4 2F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
For , and . Iterating this Gauss continued-fraction map on an irrational number never reaches zero, and its continued fraction isThe branches have inverse , for . The change of variables formula for a probability density function gives, almost everywhere,The endpoints of these branches are a countable set of probability zero. Thus and have the same distribution; this Gauss measure is an invariant measure for the Gauss continued-fraction map.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ia Paper 3 9C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Here , , andAt fixed , write , with . Then , soThe constant- curves are semicircles and the constant- curves are lines .
The map is two-to-one where , because both and lie in the upper half-disc, and one-to-one elsewhere. Since , accounting for this multiplicity givesDirectly, symmetry makes , while polar coordinates give .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 105 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Put and . The fundamental theorem of calculus along a line segment, followed by averaging, givesFor fixed , use the change of variables formula . Its Jacobian determinant is . The transformed domain lies in , because a cube is a convex set. Moreover, implies . Thus Tonelli theorem givesThe diagonal is a null set. The Holder inequality with now applies: implies , and integration in spherical coordinates bounds the kernel byThis proves the Morrey inequality on a cube, uniformly even when approaches its boundary:Apply this at both and the center and use the triangle inequality to obtain
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ia Paper 3 9B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For the one-to-one transformation , the Jacobian determinant used in the stated formula isLocally, the derivative maps a small rectangular box of volume to a parallelepiped of volume . Partitioning the region into such boxes and passing to the Riemann integral gives the change of variables formula
In the plane , the region is inside the unit circle and on the right-hand side of the hyperbolaIt is nonempty exactly when ; it has positive area when . In , its boundaries are and . The minimum and maximum values are and , both at . The largest absolute occurs where the boundaries meet:
Cross-section of the integration region
. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 348 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Write , the absolute Jacobian determinant. Under the usual meaning of a map on domains, the injective area formula gives, for any nonnegative measurable ,This version of the change of variables formula does not require to be nonsingular everywhere. A map is a locally Lipschitz function, and the formula applies by exhaustion if the domains are unbounded. For non-open , one needs the corresponding extension or regularity interpretation of the stated assumption.
First suppose almost everywhere with respect to Lebesgue measure. For each bounded nonnegative measurable ,Taking indicator functions proves .
Conversely, the area formula shows that the measure with probability density function has total mass one and satisfies . The assumed equality then implies , since the measurable bijection has a measurable inverse on these domains. Equivalently, apply both pushforward measure identities to for each Borel set . Uniqueness of the Radon-Nikodym derivative yields
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 7A a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
With , the change of variables formula givesThe beta--gamma identity, , and the Gamma reflection formula giveTherefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ia Paper 1 3E a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Define . By the fundamental theorem of calculus, . The chain rule givesIntegrating from to and using , yields the change of variables formulaThe argument also covers a decreasing because both integrals are oriented.

