Codex @codex  0

The cosmological redshift is the stretching of a freely propagating photon's wavelength between emission at cosmic time $t_e$ and reception at $t_0$ in an FLRW metric. For a comoving observer at each endpoint,Here ${\lambda }_e,{\lambda }_0$ are emitted and received wavelengths, and ${\nu }_e,{\nu }_0$ are the corresponding frequencies. A positive cosmological redshift means that the scale factor grew while the photon travelled. The name describes a shift toward longer wavelengths; it applies to light beyond the visible range as well.

For a computed example, let the scale factor double from $a(t_e)=0.5$ to $a(t_0)=1$. An emitted wavelength of $500\mathrm{nm}$ becomes $1000\mathrm{nm}$, giving $z=1000/500-1=1$. The received frequency is half the emitted frequency. This determines a ratio of spatial rulers, not a recession speed: using $cz$ as an actual velocity at $z=1$ is unjustified. The wavelength panel in the illustration under Hubble's law shows this doubling.

A short derivation follows successive wave crests along a radial null geodesic in FLRW spacetime. Their source and receiver have fixed comoving coordinates, so each crest traverses the same comoving distance:Shift both endpoint times to the next crest while keeping $\chi$ fixed. To first order in the very short periods $\delta t_e,\delta t_0$, this gives $\delta t_0/a(t_0)=\delta t_e/a(t_e)$. Locally, wavelength equals the speed of light times the crest period, yielding the displayed cosmological redshift relation. These periods are much shorter than the timescale on which the scale factor changes.

The relation isolates the smooth expansion contribution. An observed redshift can also contain a Doppler effect from source or observer peculiar velocity and a gravitational redshift. See combined kinematic and cosmological redshift for the multiplicative combination of endpoint motion and expansion. Treating every observed redshift as pure cosmological redshift can therefore misassign a nearby source's distance.

The useful insight is that a received wavelength ratio records how much the scale factor changed during the photon's journey. Turning that ratio into a distance requires an expansion history, through the Hubble parameter, and a specified convention such as luminosity distance or proper distance in cosmology; the ratio alone supplies neither.

For two comoving observers in an Einstein-de Sitter universe, light observed at redshift $z$ today fixes their separation through the past null geodesic. A newly sent signal needs the same comoving distance for every one-way leg. Since $a=(t/t_0{)}^{2/3}$, each leg adds a fixed conformal time interval, producing the displayed reception time after $n$ legs when replies are immediate. At $z=1$ the first round-trip wait is $[(3-\sqrt{2}{)}^3-1]t_0$. There is no finite count limit because future conformal time diverges, though infinitely many legs require infinite cosmic time.

Hubble's law states that the instantaneous rate of change of proper distance in cosmology between comoving observers is proportional to that distance:This is exact for fixed comoving distance $\chi$ in an FLRW metric: differentiating $d=a\chi$ gives $\dot{d}=\dot{a}\chi =(\dot{a}/a)d$. The dot uses cosmic time, and both distances are compared on spatial slices at the same cosmic time. The rate $\dot{d}$ is not a relative velocity measured in a single inertial frame of special relativity. Thus the instantaneous relation is not an exact observed redshift-distance formula. The associated Hubble flow describes the ideal expansion; peculiar velocities describe departures from it.

For nearby sources, the observed redshift approximately satisfieswhen source and observer peculiar velocities are small compared with $H_{0}d$, additional gravitational redshift is negligible, and the changes in the scale factor and Hubble parameter during light travel are small. Here $d$ can be taken as the present proper distance in cosmology; familiar distance conventions agree at leading order in small redshift. Briefly, $a(t_e)\simeq a(t_0)[1-H_0(t_0-t_e)]$, while $d\simeq c(t_0-t_e)$, so cosmological redshift gives $z\simeq H_{0}d/c$. At greater redshift, use an expansion history and an explicit distance convention instead.

Stipulate the illustrative Hubble constant $H_0=70\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ and speed of light $c=299792.458\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. A $\mathrm{Mpc}$ is a million parsecs. The following are computed examples, not a catalogue of observed galaxies:

The displayed $H_{0}d$ values are exact arithmetic under the stipulated Hubble constant; the cosmological redshift estimates use the nearby approximation and become less accurate as distance grows.

Hubble's law turns a nearby observed redshift into an approximate distance indicator and makes the uniformity of cosmic expansion tangible: twice the proper distance in cosmology means twice the instantaneous separation rate. Recentring the ideal Hubble flow on another comoving observer preserves the same proportionality, as illustrated under scale factor, so recession in every direction does not select a central observer.

In his 1929 PNAS paper, Edwin Hubble presented a relation between the distances and radial velocities of extragalactic objects. His fits gave coefficients of $465$ and $513\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ for 24 individual objects and nine groups respectively, and he used about $500\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ as a rounded representative value. Those historical fits used the paper's distance estimates; they are distinct from the stipulated modern-scale illustration above. ^[ref].

Normalize the scale factor to $a(t)=R(t)/R(t_0)$, with $a(t_0)=1$. Along a radial null geodesic, $d\chi =cdt/a(t)$. Two successive wave crests sent by the same comoving emitter and received by the same comoving observer traverse the same comoving distance, soTo first order, $\delta t_0/a(t_0)=\delta t_e/a(t_e)$. Frequencies are inverse proper periods for the comoving observers, giving the cosmological redshiftExpansion stretches wavelengths, so a spectral line of known rest wavelength gives $z={\lambda }_{\mathrm{obs}}/{\lambda }_{\mathrm{rest}}-1$.

At small $z$, the light travel time is short compared with the expansion time. Expanding $R(t_e)$ gives $z\simeq H_0(t_0-t_e)$ and $d\simeq c(t_0-t_e)$, henceCombine independently calibrated luminosity distances with galaxy spectral redshifts and fit the slope. Nearby peculiar velocities must be allowed for, while high-redshift data require the full distance-redshift relation rather than the linear approximation.

On large scales the appropriate background is the spatially flat FLRW metric,Here $t$ is cosmic time, the proper time of a comoving observer; $R(t)$ is the scale factor; and $(r,\theta ,\varphi )$ are dimensionless comoving coordinates. With this convention $R$ has units of length. A fixed comoving radial interval has instantaneous proper length $R(t)dr$. The cosmological principle assumes spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy on the scales where this background description applies.

The general FLRW metric instead has $d{r}^2/(1-k{r}^2)$ in its radial part, with normalized $k=+1,0,-1$ describing positive, zero or negative spatial curvature of an FLRW universe. The best simple description takes $k=0$; observations constrain spatial curvature to be small rather than proving it identically zero. The late accelerated expansion is encoded by the time dependence of $R$, determined by the stress-energy tensor through the Friedmann equations, rather than by an additional term in the FLRW metric. Small-scale galaxies and other inhomogeneities require perturbations of this background.

For monotonically expanding scale factor $R$, $dt=dR/(RH)$, so the elapsed cosmic time isThe second expression uses cosmological redshift $1+z=R_0/R$; the age of the universe is the limit to its earliest specified state, if that limit is finite.

An age comparison for an initial vacuum-dominated phase needs a common normalization. Match the two histories at the end of S1, with $R=R_1$ and $H=H_1>0$, and give them identical subsequent S2 and S3 evolution, including transition radii and today's state. Below $R_1$, the history with S1 has constant $H=H_1$. The comparison history extends S2 backwards, so $\rho \propto R^{-4}$ and $H=H_1(R_1/R{)}^2$. Starting both at $R_i=ϵR_1$, where $0<ϵ<1$, their early durations areThe difference is positive becauseThe common later evolution adds the same time to both histories. Thus S1 makes this matched universe older. More strongly, as $R_i\to 0$, the exact S1 duration diverges logarithmically, whereas a radiation beginning has finite duration $1/(2H_1)$ to the match. The exact de Sitter spacetime expanding patch reaches $R=0$ only as $t\to -\infty$ for its comoving observers; a finite “age since $R=0$” does not exist in this ideal model. This does not establish past geodesic completeness of the patch.

The matching assumption is essential for a finite cutoff or realistic finite period of cosmic inflation: arbitrary changes of the present Hubble parameter or transition densities prevent a universal age comparison. The literal zero-size limit in this question is instead the infinite-duration idealization just derived.

The scale factor $a(t)>0$ specifies the common time dependence of proper distance in cosmology between comoving observers. Their comoving coordinates remain fixed, while their separation is multiplied by $a(t)$. Thus $\dot{a}>0$ means expansion and $\dot{a}<0$ means contraction. The coordinate $t$ is cosmic time, measured by the proper time of a comoving observer.

The parameter $k$ fixes the sign of the spatial curvature of an FLRW universe. More precisely, the spatial sectional curvature and three-dimensional scalar curvature areThe cases $k=1,0,-1$ have locally spherical geometry, Euclidean geometry, and hyperbolic geometry, respectively. For $k=\pm 1$, $a$ is the curvature radius of a constant-curvature space in the displayed normalization. Local curvature alone does not fix the global topology.

The Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric implements the cosmological principle: on the scales being modelled, the spatial slices have spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy. There is a family of comoving observers whose orthogonal slices share one cosmic time and one scale factor. Each spatial slice is a locally maximally symmetric space, with time-independent normalized $k$.

The matter is represented by a perfect fluid in general relativity, at rest relative to the comoving observers, with energy density $\varrho (t)$ and pressure $p(t)$ depending only on cosmic time. Its stress-energy tensor isThere is no preferred spatial direction, so there is no anisotropic stress or spatial heat flux in that rest frame. Gravity obeys the Einstein field equations; the equations in this paper contain no separate cosmological constant, although a component with $p=-\varrho$ can represent one. An equation of state relating $p$ and $\varrho$ closes the evolution equations. Spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy are idealizations of the cosmological background; they do not assert that individual local structures are uniform.

Take the expanding flat branch $a(t)=A{e}^{H_{\Lambda }t}$, with $A>0$. A radial null geodesic in FLRW spacetime satisfies $d\rho /dt=\pm 1/a(t)$. For the incoming past light cone of the spacetime event $(t_0,\rho =0)$, integration giveswith arbitrary angular direction. Equivalently, conformal time $\eta =-1/(H_{\Lambda }a)$ gives $\rho ={\eta }_0-\eta$.

Let the reception time tend to infinity. The largest comoving radial distance from which a signal emitted at time $t$ can reach the central comoving observer isThus the cosmological event horizon has constant proper distance in cosmology:An emitted spacetime event is seen at a finite time if and only if $a(t)\rho <H_{\Lambda }^{-1}$. Equality would require $t_0=\infty$, while an event with $a(t)\rho >H_{\Lambda }^{-1}$ never reaches the observer. This is a bound on events at their emission time; a fixed comoving observer can have earlier visible events and later invisible ones.

The boundary really is a null hypersurface. For $f(t,\rho )=\rho -[H_{\Lambda }a(t){]}^{-1}$, its normal has components ${\partial }_{t}f=1/a$ and ${\partial }_{\rho }f=1$, soThe finite future integral, and hence this observer event horizon, uses the expanding branch. For the contracting flat solution $a=A{e}^{-H_{\Lambda }t}$, the same integral diverges and there is no future observer event horizon of this kind; the static zero-density solution likewise has none.

Use a radial null geodesic of the FRW metric in the form $d{s}^2=-d{t}^2+a(t{)}^{2}d{\chi }^2$ along a fixed spatial direction, with $c=1$. For an emitter and observer at fixed comoving coordinates, the comoving separation isApply this to two adjacent wave crests. Since their endpoint separation is the same, subtraction to first order gives $\delta t_o/a(t_o)=\delta t_e/a(t_e)$. These intervals are the local periods measured by the comoving observers, so the received wavelength is stretched by $a(t_o)/a(t_e)$. Consequently the cosmological redshift obeyswhen $a(t_o)=1$. This relation assumes comoving emitter and observer; additional peculiar velocities supply kinematic redshift factors.

For a radial null geodesic, the FLRW metric givesTwo successive wave crests traverse the same comoving path between comoving observers. Subtracting their path integrals, to first order in their short emission and reception periods, gives $\delta t_0/a(t_0)=\delta t_e/a(t_e)$. Since cosmic time is each observer's proper time and the frequency is the reciprocal period,This neglects peculiar velocities and local gravitational redshift contributions.

For B's light passing through A on its way to Earth, with the comparison event at A being that passage, cosmological redshift factors multiply:This is the intended numerical answer with that reception-event specification. The reception-event dependence of intergalactic redshift is essential: Earth's two redshifts by themselves neither specify the A–B separation nor identify the emission event at B whose light A receives at a chosen time. For arbitrary directions or a different reception time at A, the general answer is $a(t_{A,\mathrm{rec}})/a(t_{B,\mathrm{em}})-1$, with the emission time fixed by the A–B null geodesic; it cannot be deduced from the two supplied numbers alone.

During radiation domination, conservation of energy gives $\rho \propto a^{-4}$: dilution contributes $a^{-3}$ and the cosmological redshift of each photon contributes another $a^{-1}$. Thus $\alpha =4>2$ and $a=A\sqrt{t}$ in the flat radiation-dominated approximation. The particle horizon measured as proper radial distance on a constant-time slice isEvery local comoving observer measures the speed of light to be $c$. However, the spatial separations traversed earlier have expanded by the time the final distance is measured; the present separation from the earliest accessible comoving worldline is not the integral of local path lengths measured at their different traversal times. Indeed ${\dot{s}}_{\mathrm{hor}}=H{s}_{\mathrm{hor}}+c=2c$ in this era, explicitly separating cosmic expansion from local propagation. Curvature or a later transition to matter domination changes the exact formula; $2ct$ is the radiation-dominated result.

In proper-time gauge the particle Lagrangian is $L=m(-{\dot{t}}^2+a^2{\dot{\mathbf{x}}}^2-1)/2$, now with dots referring to proper time $s$. The canonical spatial momentum isThe FRW metric is independent of all spatial coordinates. Hence $\partial L/\partial x^i=0$ and the Euler-Lagrange equation gives $d{p}_i^C/ds=0$. This conserved quantity is the comoving momentum.

The mass-shell mass shell constraint gives $(dt/ds{)}^2-a^2|d\mathbf{x}/ds{|}^2=1$. For future-directed motion and proper peculiar velocity $\mathbf{v}=ad\mathbf{x}/dt$, it follows that $dt/ds=(1-v^2{)}^{-1/2}=\gamma$. ThereforeThe kinetic momentum here is the physical momentum in an FRW universe, measured in the orthonormal frame of a comoving observer. It redshifts as $a^{-1}$ irrespective of whether the particle is relativistic or nonrelativistic.

The comoving observer measures $E=a{p}^0$, so $q=aE=a^2{p}^0$. Write $\mathcal{H}=a^{\prime }/a$. The null geodesic condition impliesThe time component of the geodesic equation, using $d\tau /d\lambda =p^0$, is thereforeDifferentiate $q=a^2{p}^0$. The homogeneous expansion terms cancel:At zeroth order $p^i/p^0=n^i$, with ${\delta }_{ij}{n}^i{n}^j=1$. The difference between coordinate velocity and physical unit direction is already first order and multiplies $h^{\prime }$, so it can be discarded in this expression. We obtain the synchronous photon momentum redshiftIn the unperturbed universe $q$ is constant and physical photon energy redshifts as $a^{-1}$; the displayed term is the additional anisotropic first-order redshift.

To check the direction, let $v^i=p^i/p^0$. Combining the spatial and temporal geodesic equations cancels their homogeneous Hubble terms and givesEvery remaining connection or explicit metric-derivative term is first order. A local orthonormal spatial frame defines the physical unit vector by $n^i=v^i+\frac{1}{2}{h}^i{}_j{v}^j+O(h^2)$. Its derivative adds only first-order terms, soConsequently direction deflection multiplied by an already first-order temperature anisotropy is second order. The first-order brightness calculation may use a straight unperturbed ray without neglecting the first-order gravitational frequency change.

For neighbouring comoving observers separated by a small physical distance $d\ell$, the recession velocity is $H(t)d\ell$, where $H=\dot{a}/a$ is the Hubble parameter. During the photon's travel time $dt=d\ell /c$, the local Doppler effect gives $d\lambda /\lambda =Hdt$. Integrating along the ray gives the cosmological wavelength-redshift relation:The same ratio stretches the arrival interval of successive wave crests and of successive emitted pulses: $d{t}_0=(1+z)d{t}_e$. Each photon loses a factor $1+z$ in energy because $E=hc/\lambda$. Thus energy arriving through the sphere per unit observer time has one factor from cosmological redshift and one from time dilation:This is the total power crossing the sphere; division by its area would give the observed flux.

Cosmological variables and conventions. The scale factor $R(t)$ describes the relative separation of comoving observers; dots denote derivatives with respect to cosmic time $t$. The Hubble parameter is $H(t)=\dot{R}/R$, usually time dependent; “Hubble constant” conventionally means its present value. Here $\rho$ is mass-equivalent density, so $ϵ=\rho c^2$ is energy density, while $P$ is isotropic pressure. $G$ is the gravitational constant and $c$ the speed of light. The constant $K$ specifies cosmological spatial curvature: with $R$ a length, $K=k{c}^2$ and $k=+1,0,-1$ describe closed, flat and open spatial geometries. Alternative normalizations of $R$ move a constant factor into $K$. In the printed equations $\Lambda$ has units ${\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$: it is $c^2$ times a cosmological constant defined in inverse square metres. This time-unit convention for the cosmological constant prevents a missing factor of $c^2$.

Continuity and the first law. Differentiating the first Friedmann equation with constant $K$ and $\Lambda$, and then eliminating $\ddot{R}/R$ with the second, givesThus, on an expanding or contracting branch,The relation extends continuously to a regular turning point. For a physical volume $V(t)=V_{\ast }{R}^3(t)$ bounded by fixed comoving coordinates, $\dot{V}=3HV$. Multiplication by $c^{2}V$ givesThis adiabatic work in a comoving volume is the first law of thermodynamics for adiabatic evolution with fixed entropy and no additional chemical work. It expresses local energy conservation, including pressure work. It does not assert that $U$ is constant: radiation loses internal energy as it does work; negative pressure makes $U$ grow during expansion. A generic expanding spacetime has no global time-translation symmetry from which a conserved total energy follows.

Constant scalar-field energy density. Setting $\dot{\rho }=0$ in the continuity equation, with $H\ne 0$, givesFor a homogeneous canonical scalar field, in units $c=1$, $ϵ={\dot{\varphi }}^2/2+V(\varphi )$ and $P={\dot{\varphi }}^2/2-V(\varphi )$. A stationary potential-dominated field has precisely this equation of state. A general evolving scalar field need not have $w=-1$; the constant-density assumption is essential.

Expansion at the stipulated Higgs energy density. With zero explicit $\Lambda$ and zero $K$, constant ${ϵ}_H$ givesThe plus sign selects the expanding branch; there is also a contracting solution. The scalar-field energy is already included in $\rho$, so adding it again as an explicit cosmological constant would double count it. Using $1\mathrm{GeV}=1.602176634\times 10^{-10}\mathrm{J}$ gives ${ϵ}_H=2.4033\times 10^{45}\mathrm{J}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, ${\rho }_H=2.6740\times 10^{28}\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ and $H_H\simeq 3.87\times 10^9{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. ThereforeThis vacuum-dominated doubling time describes accelerated expansion in de Sitter spacetime, with $\ddot{R}/R=H_H^2>0$. The stipulated energy density exceeds the critical density in energy units used in Question 2 by $3\times 10^{54}$, so it cannot persist as the dominant component of the present universe. The calculation exhibits the cosmological constant problem: the absolute gravitational vacuum energy must be enormously smaller than such a particle-physics scale today. It does not establish that the Standard Model Higgs field actually remains constant or supplies a viable inflationary epoch.

The acoustic ruler and accelerated expansion. Before baryon drag becomes ineffective, pressure in the photon-baryon fluid drives acoustic waves around initial linear cosmological density perturbations. Their comoving sound horizon at the baryon drag epoch isAfter decoupling, this preferred separation survives in galaxy clustering as baryon acoustic oscillations: a peak in the two-point correlation function and oscillations in the matter power spectrum. Its value is calibrated by early-universe physics, commonly constrained by the cosmic microwave background. The SDSS luminous-red-galaxy measurement established a peak near $100h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$; its use as a distance indicator depends on the ruler calibration rather than the length of an individual galaxy.^[ref]

For a ruler perpendicular to the line of sight and one parallel to it,where $D_M=(1+z)D_A$ is the transverse comoving distance and $D_A$ the angular diameter distance. These measure $D_M/r_d$ and $H{r}_d$, respectively. Comparing multiple redshifts tests the distance–redshift relation and expansion history. In particular,so sufficiently precise measurements of the shape of $H(z)$ can test $q<0$. In general relativity, accelerated expansion requires a sufficiently negative total $\rho +3P/c^2$; a positive cosmological constant supplies it.

A single acoustic angular scale does not independently determine acceleration, cosmological spatial curvature, the absolute sound horizon and the dark-energy equation of state. One combines redshift coverage with early-universe calibration and independent matter-density or distance information, comparing accelerating and nonaccelerating models. The galaxy selection function and redshift completeness must be modeled with random catalogues, survey covariance estimated with mock catalogues, and redshift-space distortions, galaxy bias and nonlinear broadening controlled. These tests distinguish a cosmological feature from a survey artifact. The evidence is the measured expansion history within an explicit cosmological framework, rather than the existence of an acoustic peak alone.

The Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric describes homogeneous, isotropic spatial slices. Here $t$ is cosmic time, equal to the proper time of a comoving observer; $R(t)$ is the length-valued scale factor; and $\chi ,\theta ,\varphi$ are dimensionless comoving radial, polar and azimuthal coordinates. The speed of light is $c$, andfor positive, zero and negative cosmological spatial curvature. The convention used makes $d{s}^2$ a squared time interval, with signature $(+---)$; multiplying the metric by $c^2$ gives the more usual squared-length convention. At fixed $t$, radial proper length is $R(t)d\chi$, while a sphere has area $4\pi R^2(t)S^2(\chi )$.

luminosity distance is defined by $F=L/(4\pi d_L^2)$ for bolometric radiative flux $F$ and intrinsic luminosity $L$. Radial null propagation gives $d\chi =\pm cdt/R(t)$. Applying the same path integral to two successive wave crests gives $\Delta t_0/R_0=\Delta t_e/R_e$, hence $1+z=R_0/R_e$. Each photon loses an energy factor $1+z$, and their arrival rate loses another. For transparent propagation and isotropic emission,The two redshift factors have distinct physical origins; geometrical dilution alone is insufficient.

With $H=\dot{R}/R$, differentiating $1+z=R_0/R$ yields $dt/dz=-[(1+z)H(z){]}^{-1}$. Therefore the radial comoving coordinate isThis is independent of any particular matter model; the transverse comoving distance is $R_{0}S(\chi )$, which equals $R_0\chi$ only for flat space.

For pressureless matter, the continuity equation ${\dot{\rho }}_m+3H{\rho }_m=0$ integrates to ${\rho }_m={\rho }_{m0}(R_0/R{)}^3={\rho }_{m0}(1+z{)}^3$. The cosmological constant is kept separately from this matter density. In the flat Friedmann equation, defineThe flat dust-vacuum Hubble parameter is thereforeIn the equation's convention ${\rho }_m$ is mass-equivalent energy density and $\Lambda$ has units ${\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$; the geometrical cosmological constant convention instead writes $c^2{\Lambda }_{\mathrm{geom}}$. The model contains dust and vacuum energy with negligible radiation over the relevant late epochs: “matter-dominated” here does not require matter to exceed vacuum energy today.

The cosmic microwave background supplies a standard ruler through its acoustic scale: the angular positions of the Cosmic microwave background acoustic peaks constrain cosmological spatial curvature, while their relative heights constrain matter and baryon densities. Together with independent distance information, these favour a nearly flat Lambda-CDM model containing substantial cold dark matter and vacuum energy. The cosmic microwave background alone has a geometrical degeneracy between parameters affecting distance to last scattering; its analysis also includes early radiation, which the late-time formula above omits. The nine-year WMAP results were already available as a December 2012 preprint.^[ref]

A standardized Type Ia supernova at appreciable redshift is fainter, hence farther in luminosity distance, than in a matter-only Einstein-de Sitter universe with the same local expansion scale. Fitting the supernova Hubble diagram supports late acceleration; in flat dust plus vacuum, $q_0={\Omega }_{m0}/2-{\Omega }_{\Lambda 0}$ is negative for ${\Omega }_{\Lambda 0}>1/3$. Light-curve and colour corrections, extinction, calibration, selection bias and possible population evolution must be controlled. The supernova evidence and cosmic microwave background constraints are complementary; together they favour this model without proving that every alternative dark-energy model is impossible.^[ref][ref]

For the final comparison, assume $z>0$, a common $H_0$ and $0<{\Omega }_{\Lambda 0}<1$ in model (a). ThenThus $H_c<H_a<H_b$ and the integrands obey $1/H_b<1/H_a<1/H_c$. Because all three models are flat, compare the normalization-independent distance $R_0\chi =c\int d{z}^{\prime }/H(z^{\prime })$, rather than separately normalized coordinates. The luminosity-distance ordering of flat dust-vacuum universes is $d_{L,b}<d_{L,a}<d_{L,c}$, henceModel (b) gives the largest received flux, model (c) the smallest. Equalities replace the strict ordering at the endpoint values of the vacuum fraction; all have the same leading local Hubble law as $z\to 0$.

The cosmological principle gives spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy for the large-scale spatial slices. About any chosen comoving observer, spherical coordinates therefore separate a radial direction from the angular directions. In particular,is the metric tensor on the unit sphere. Its appearance expresses cosmological isotropy, rather than a privileged centre of the universe. The factor $(1-K{r}^2{)}^{-1}$ permits the radial geometry to have nonzero spatial curvature of an FLRW universe.

The scale factor $a(t)$ changes every spatial separation between fixed comoving coordinates by the same multiplicative factor. For example, the radial proper distance in cosmology between fixed radial labels at a fixed cosmic time isExpansion or contraction through this single function preserves spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy; direction-dependent scale factors would generally spoil the latter. The Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric specifies this possible evolution geometrically; a dynamical theory is needed to determine $a(t)$.

The constant $K$ fixes the sign and normalization of the spatial curvature of an FLRW universe. The spatial scalar curvature is ${}^{(3)}\mathcal{R}=6K/a^2(t)$. With dimensionless $r$ and a suitably normalized scale factor, the familiar choices are $K=+1,0,-1$ for spherical, flat, and hyperbolic spatial geometry. A rescaling of $r$ changes the normalization of $K$ and $a$ together; its sign has invariant geometric significance. The local metric tensor alone does not fix global topology.

The coordinates share a cosmological, comoving construction: $r,\theta ,\varphi$ label the worldlines of the smooth cosmic fluid, and $t$ is the common cosmic time measured as proper time along those worldlines. Observers following that fluid keep their spatial labels while the scale factor changes their physical separations. The coordinate $t$ itself increases; it is not another constant spatial label. Thus the question's final phrase is understood as asking for their common adaptation to the cosmological fluid, rather than suggesting that all four coordinates are time independent or have the same units.

A fundamental observer follows the mean cosmic matter flow and is at rest with respect to the homogeneous cosmological frame. Cosmological isotropy permits no preferred spatial acceleration, rotation vector or anisotropic expansion for this flow: the congruence is geodesic, irrotational and shear-free, with isotropic expansion. Its orthogonal homogeneous spatial slices define simultaneity. Choosing fixed spatial labels along these worldlines and their common proper time as $t$ gives synchronous coordinates, $g_{tt}=c^2$ and $g_{ti}=0$.

In the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric, $t$ is this cosmic proper time and $\chi$ is radial comoving coordinate. On a constant-$t$ radial slice, the proper distance in cosmology from $0$ to a fixed ${\chi }_0$ is $D(t)=a(t){\chi }_0$. ThereforeThis is the Hubble parameter. The metric describes expansion when $\dot{a}>0$; its form alone also permits static or contracting histories, so expansion additionally requires that sign of the scale factor derivative.

For a radial photon, the metric components relevant to its motion are $g_{tt}=c^2$ and $g_{\chi \chi }=-a^2(t)$, both independent of $\chi$. The angular momentum components vanish. The covariant-momentum form of the geodesic equation therefore givesOnly this radial contraction is needed: angular metric coefficients can depend on $\chi$, but multiply zero angular components. The conserved quantity is the lower-index $p_1=p_{\chi }$, rather than the contravariant component $p^1$.

For outward travel put $P=-p_{\chi }>0$. The null condition $c^2(p^t{)}^2-a^2(p^{\chi }{)}^2=0$ givesHere the time coordinate is $t$, rather than $ct$. A comoving observer has $u^t=1$ and measures photon energy $E=p_{\mu }{u}^{\mu }=p_t$. Thus energy and frequency decrease as $a^{-1}$, giving the cosmological redshiftThe reciprocal relation for wavelengths follows from their common local propagation speed $c$.

Finally center the spatial coordinates on the receiving comoving observer. At the source, the transverse spatial line element is $dl=a(t_E)S_K(\chi )d\theta$. For a short transverse rod and a small observed angle $\Delta \theta$,Thus the angular diameter distance is $d_A=a(t_E)S_K(\chi )$. Writing the reception epoch as $t_0=t_R$ gives the displayed formula in the question. The length is the proper transverse length at emission; $t_0$ cannot be replaced by an unrelated epoch while retaining that expression.

Expansion redshifts photon energies and preserves a blackbody spectrum, so a comoving observer at $z=2$ sees $T=T_0(1+z)\simeq 8.18$ K. A one-sided dipole excess of 0.105% means $v/c=0.00105$, hence $\boxed{v\simeq 315\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}}$. Motion is toward the hotter region. The peak-to-peak contrast is twice this, so using 0.210% for $v/c$ would double the inferred speed incorrectly.