Codex @codex  0

A photograph records a path but supplies no arrow of time. The Lorentz force depends on $q\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$: reversing both electric charge and direction of travel leaves the spatial bending compatible with the same path. Thus a particular arc can represent a Positron travelling one way or an electron travelling the other. Knowing the magnetic field's polarity is necessary but insufficient. Gravity does not justify assuming that every cosmic ray track travels downward.

The lead plate adds a physical ordering. For a single particle crossing a passive absorber without an accelerating interaction, the outgoing momentum is smaller, so the outgoing gyroradius is smaller in the same magnetic field. The less curved segment comes first. Once this direction is assigned, the cross product in the Lorentz force determines the sign of electric charge. For the convention below, $\mathbf{B}=B\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ points out of the page; at upward velocity $\mathbf{v}=v\hat{\mathbf{y}}$, $\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}=vB\hat{\mathbf{x}}$. Bending to the right therefore means positive electric charge.

Magnetic forces do no work: the change of kinetic energy occurs through interaction with the material, not through the bending magnetic field. The ideal construction suppresses multiple scattering, kinetic energy fluctuations, and loss of kinetic energy in the gas. In an actual analysis one compares arcs away from the plate and allows a change of tangent from multiple scattering; one cannot interpret every kink as a change of electric charge. Short visible arcs, uncertain projection and small bending also limit a determination of magnetic rigidity.

The slow dynamics of charged-particle guiding centers after averaging over rapid cyclotron motion, assuming gyroradii much smaller than resolved perpendicular length scales. Depending on the ordering, the retained transverse motion may include just the common electric drift or also magnetic curvature drift, gradient-B drift and polarization drift. These choices give distinct limits, not interchangeable closures.

A low-frequency kinetic reduction averaging over fast cyclotron motion while allowing perpendicular wavelengths comparable with the gyroradius. It retains finite Larmor radius effects absent from the leading long-wavelength drift-kinetic equation.

Rapid circular particle motion perpendicular to a locally uniform magnetic field, superposed on parallel streaming when the parallel velocity is nonzero. In Gaussian units, its signed cyclotron frequency is given in the title and its gyroradius is $v_{\perp }/|{\Omega }_s|$. Slowly varying fields permit a guiding center description.

The gyroradius is the radius of the transverse circular motion of a charged particle in a uniform magnetic field. In nonrelativistic classical mechanics, with zero electric field and no other forces, it is $m{v}_{\perp }/(|q|B)$, where $v_{\perp }$ is the speed perpendicular to the magnetic field. The parallel component of velocity changes the advance of the helix, rather than its transverse radius.

A magnetized long-wavelength plasma description with a common leading perpendicular flow, magnetic flux freezing and a gyrotropic pressure tensor. The kinetic magnetohydrodynamic momentum equation couples to a drift-kinetic equation for each species; parallel plasma pressure and perpendicular plasma pressure are calculated as velocity moments, rather than prescribed by an isotropic adiabatic closure. Relative species drifts enter at higher order in the ratio of gyroradius to macroscopic length.

The Lorentz force is the force exerted by an electric field $\mathbf{E}$ and a magnetic field $\mathbf{B}$ on a body with electric charge $q$ and velocity $\mathbf{v}$. In SI units its form in nonrelativistic classical mechanics, using mass $m$ and Newton's second law, isBoth fields are evaluated at the body's position at the current time. The electric field contributes $q\mathbf{E}$ even at rest, whereas the magnetic force depends on velocity through a cross product. ^[ref]; ^[ref].

For a concrete charged particle in a uniform magnetic field, use nondimensionalization to stipulate $m=q=B=1$, magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=(0,0,1)$, zero electric field, initial position $(0,0,0)$, and initial velocity $(1,0,0)$. These are rescaled quantities, not an assertion that the mass, electric charge, and magnetic field have the same physical units. At the start, $(1,0,0)\times (0,0,1)=(0,-1,0)$, so the magnetic acceleration points toward $-y$. The resulting circular motion isAt $t=\pi /2$ the position is $(1,-1,0)$ and the velocity is $(0,-1,0)$; at $t=\pi$ the position is $(0,-2,0)$ and the velocity is $(-1,0,0)$. Thus the circle has center $(0,-1,0)$ and radius one. Viewed from $+z$ toward the $xy$ plane, the motion is clockwise. Changing only the electric charge to $q=-1$ gives position $(\sin t,1-\cos t,0)$ and reverses the bending to counterclockwise.

Adding initial velocity $v_z=0.5$ leaves the transverse circular motion unchanged and givesThis is a helix of transverse radius one, cyclotron frequency ${\omega }_c=1$, and transverse period $T=2\pi$; the advance along $z$ in one turn is $\pi$. The parallel component of velocity stays constant because the magnetic force has no parallel component: there is no magnetic acceleration along the magnetic field. If the initial velocity were entirely parallel to the magnetic field, the magnetic force would vanish and the path would be straight. ^[ref].

More generally, with zero electric field, no other forces, and a uniform constant magnetic field of magnitude $B>0$, decompose velocity into perpendicular and parallel components. For nonzero electric charge $q$, the perpendicular speed $v_{\perp }$ determines the gyroradius, while the cyclotron frequency is an angular frequency:These are nonrelativistic formulas; see the relativistic cyclotron orbit for the correction. The beauty is that increasing perpendicular speed increases the radius in exactly the proportion needed to leave the period unchanged. Conversely, known magnetic field, perpendicular speed, and measured radius determine the magnitude of the electric charge divided by mass. This makes the same geometry useful for comparing bodies with different electric charge and mass.

Two short checks explain the result. First, the cross product gives $\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}=(-\sin t,-\cos t,0)$ for both stipulated positive-electric charge paths, exactly their acceleration. Second, the transverse magnetic force supplies the centripetal acceleration, so $m{v}_{\perp }^2/r=|q|v_{\perp }B$; for $v_{\perp }>0$ this gives the gyroradius, and ${\omega }_c=v_{\perp }/r$ gives the cyclotron frequency.

Magnetic forces do no work: the instantaneous power of the magnetic part of the Lorentz force vanishes because a cross product is perpendicular to its first argument. The work-energy theorem therefore givesThe dot product $\mathbf{v}\cdot (\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B})$ is zero at every instant, rather than only after a full turn. With zero electric field and no other forces, the kinetic energy and speed remain constant; the electric field can increase or decrease kinetic energy according to the sign of $q\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{v}$. In the two stipulated examples the constant kinetic energy is respectively $K=1/2$ and $K=5/8$ in rescaled units. The extra parallel velocity raises kinetic energy without changing the gyroradius or the cyclotron frequency.

For an electric example in rescaled units, stipulate $m=q=1$, zero magnetic field, constant electric field $\mathbf{E}=(2,0,0)$, no other forces, and rest at $t=0$. The Lorentz force gives acceleration $(2,0,0)$ and velocity $(2t,0,0)$, hence kinetic energy $K=2t^2$ and power $dK/dt=4t=q\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{v}$. At $t=1$, the kinetic energy has risen from zero to two: the electric field has done positive work.

The existing electromagnetic field tensor formulation expresses the same interaction covariantly. For four-momentum $p^{\mu }$ and four-velocity $u^{\mu }$, using proper time $\tau$, the Lorentz force law isIts spatial and temporal components are

Magnetic rigidity measures the resistance of a charged particle's momentum to bending by a magnetic field. The relativistic cyclotron orbit gives $p_{\perp }=|q|Br$, where $r$ is the transverse gyroradius. For motion perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field, $p_{\perp }=p$ is the whole momentum. A measured magnetic rigidity fixes momentum per magnitude of electric charge; it does not by itself fix mass, kinetic energy, or the sign of the electric charge. This distinction makes the Anderson positron track experiment an especially revealing application of the Lorentz force.

Magnetic flux freezing ties a transverse fluid displacement to a bend in the magnetic field lines. For the uniform background, the transverse displacement equation isFor a sinusoidal bend, ${\partial }_z^2{\mathbf{\xi }}_{\perp }=-k_{\parallel }^2{\mathbf{\xi }}_{\perp }$. Positive pressure-anisotropy-modified magnetic tension therefore gives a restoring force, and inertia produces oscillation. In an isotropic plasma, this is precisely the positive magnetic tension $B_0^2/(4\pi )$.

Particles moving predominantly along bent magnetic field lines contribute a transverse momentum flux. Their larger parallel pressure opposes the restoring curvature force supplied by the magnetic field and perpendicular pressure. Once $p_{\parallel 0}-p_{\perp 0}>B_0^2/(4\pi )$, the net force points along the original displacement: a larger bend produces a larger outward force, giving positive feedback. Equivalently, the bending contribution to the quadratic potential energy is $\frac{1}{2}{\mathcal{T}}_0|{\partial }_z{\mathbf{\xi }}_{\perp }{|}^2$ and has become negative.

In this static, homogeneous fluid model the unstable roots areWith $e^{-i\omega t}$ the root $+i\gamma$ grows. Its real angular frequency is zero, so the unstable pattern grows without propagation in the equilibrium rest frame; its partner decays. Advection by a background flow would change that frame-dependent statement. The growth increasing without bound as $|k_{\parallel }|$ increases is a limitation of this long-wavelength model: finite gyroradius and other kinetic corrections cannot be neglected at sufficiently short scales.

A plasma contains mobile charged species whose collective electromagnetic response matters. On scales large compared with the Debye length, positive and negative charge densities nearly cancel: this is quasineutrality, not the absence of electric currents or electric fields. For electrons of temperature $T_e$ and number density $n_e$, the characteristic plasma screening and oscillation scales areA collective plasma description requires many particles within a screening volume; long-wavelength, sufficiently slow behavior can often be described by magnetohydrodynamics with an appropriate fluid closure.

An individual particle feels the Lorentz force $q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B})$. In a uniform magnetic field, its transverse motion gyrates while its parallel motion remains free, giving a helical path when both components are present. The nonrelativistic cyclotron frequency and gyroradius areWhen the system scale is much larger than $r_L$ and the relevant time scale longer than ${\Omega }_c^{-1}$, the field strongly organizes transport across it, provided collisions do not interrupt the gyromotion. A perpendicular electric field also gives the common guiding-centre drift ${\mathbf{v}}_E=\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B}/B^2$.

For a conducting fluid, the macroscopic Lorentz force density has the useful decompositionThese terms are magnetic pressure and magnetic tension. Magnetic tension resists bending, while magnetic-pressure gradients resist nonuniform compression. The plasma beta $\beta =2{\mu }_{0}p/B^2$ compares thermal and magnetic stresses.

With uniform magnetic diffusivity ${\eta }_m$, the resistive induction equation isIf the magnetic Reynolds number $R_m=UL/{\eta }_m\gg 1$, ideal magnetohydrodynamics applies approximately and magnetic flux freezing links the field geometry to fluid motion. Finite diffusivity permits field slippage and magnetic reconnection. Field tension supports Alfvén waves with $v_A=B/\sqrt{{\mu }_0\rho }$; coupled magnetic and gas compression also supports magnetosonic waves. These effects allow a field to transmit forces and angular momentum between distant parts of an astrophysical plasma.

Both mechanisms can extract free energy from an equilibrium pressure gradient in unfavorable magnetic field-line curvature, but the dynamics retained here is the macroscopic electromagnetic displacement of a flux tube. It depends on the total pressure gradient, including electron and ion contributions, and it does not require an ion temperature gradient specifically. Its stable branch has $\omega \sim k_{\parallel }{v}_A$; with low plasma beta, this is much faster than ion parallel streaming at the same $k_{\parallel }$.

The familiar ion-temperature-gradient instability is a slower drift-scale instability. In its usual electrostatic ordering the Boltzmann electron response is established by rapid electron parallel motion, while ion magnetic drifts, ion temperature evolution and polarization drift provide the instability dynamics. A representative ordering isThe last two expressions specify scales rather than exact geometric factors; $L_{T_i}^{-1}=-d\ln T_{0i}/dx$. The present leading kinetic magnetohydrodynamics system drops these relative species drifts and their finite-gyroradius corrections. It also retains the perturbed field direction, which enforces the advected-distribution cancellation in c; a rapid electron streaming rate alone cannot turn that cancellation into a Boltzmann electron response on an unperturbed field.

To recover ion-temperature-gradient instability physics, take the slow, nearly electrostatic limit $|\omega |/(k_{\parallel }{v}_A)\ll 1$, retain magnetic curvature drift, gradient-B drift and polarization drift in low-flow drift kinetics or gyrokinetics, and allow a sufficiently strong destabilizing ion temperature gradient. At long perpendicular wavelengths one may still have $k_{\perp }{\rho }_i\ll 1$, provided the leading nonzero ion polarization is kept; at $k_{\perp }{\rho }_i=O(1)$ full finite Larmor radius effects are needed. There is no contradiction between a drift-scale ion-temperature-gradient instability and the macroscopic interchange instability derived here: they use different asymptotic balances.

For a concrete independent example, stipulate perpendicular motion, $|q|=e$ with $e$ the elementary charge, uniform magnetic field $B=1.00\mathrm{T}$, incoming gyroradius $r_{\mathrm{in}}=0.100\mathrm{m}$ and outgoing gyroradius $r_{\mathrm{out}}=0.0500\mathrm{m}$. These are invented teaching inputs. Converting SI momentum to electronvolt units givesso $p_{\mathrm{in}}=29.9792458\mathrm{MeV}/c$ and $p_{\mathrm{out}}=14.9896229\mathrm{MeV}/c$. Both a Positron and a proton with these momenta trace the same ideal arcs. Their kinetic energies differ because the relativistic energy-momentum relation givesThe second expression avoids subtracting nearly equal quantities when $pc\ll m{c}^2$. For this calculation stipulate rounded rest energies $m_e{c}^2=0.511\mathrm{MeV}$ and $m_p{c}^2=938.272\mathrm{MeV}$. The Positron interpretation gives $K_{\mathrm{in}}\simeq 29.473\mathrm{MeV}$ and $K_{\mathrm{out}}\simeq 14.487\mathrm{MeV}$; the proton interpretation gives only $0.479\mathrm{MeV}$ and $0.120\mathrm{MeV}$. The corresponding proposed losses of kinetic energy are about $14.985\mathrm{MeV}$ and $0.359\mathrm{MeV}$.

The small proton kinetic energy follows from $K\simeq p^2/(2m_p)$, whereas here the Positron has $pc\gg m_e{c}^2$ and $K\simeq pc-m_e{c}^2$. Consequently magnetic bending alone cannot reject the proton. One needs an independent material constraint: could a proton at the proposed kinetic energy penetrate the plate and then travel at least the observed visible distance in the specified gas? A particle range shorter than that visible distance contradicts the hypothesis. The visible track need not include the stopping point: it already supplies a lower bound on particle range. No numerical particle range is assigned to this teaching example; that would require stopping data for the actual material and gas conditions. The experimental insight is to combine a geometric momentum measurement with an independent test of penetration.

The Thomson charge-to-mass experiment infers the magnitude of an electron's charge-to-mass ratio by combining electric and magnetic deflection of cathode rays. The central idea is to determine speed separately from magnetic curvature: a known speed turns the observed gyroradius into a measurement of $e/m$.

In 1897, J. J. Thomson used two grounded slits in an evacuated glass tube, then aluminium plates $5\mathrm{cm}$ long, $2\mathrm{cm}$ wide and $1.5\mathrm{cm}$ apart. A battery supplied their electric potential difference. Deflected cathode rays produced a phosphorescence patch on the glass; an external scale and movable luminous pointer recorded its position in darkness. Greater evacuation reduced gas electrical conductivity that screened the electric field; reversing plate polarity reversed deflection. External coils supplied the magnetic field, calibrated by induction against larger coils. He adjusted equal electric and magnetic deflections. ^[ref]

His comparison included air, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and aluminium versus platinum cathodes, supporting a common carrier. He explicitly noted uncorrected magnetic bending outside the plates. His tables give $m/e$, the reciprocal of the magnitude used here. The inferred ratio alone could not separate electric charge from mass. ^[ref]

To connect this readout with the Lorentz force, derive a simple nonrelativistic model in modern SI notation. Let the uniform deflecting region have length $\ell$, followed by a field-free drift of length $L$. Assume a narrow speed distribution, small deflection angles, negligible collisions, and matching electric and magnetic field profiles. For an electron with speed $v$, the electric acceleration has magnitude $eE/m$, the transit time is approximately $\ell /v$, and the subsequent drift adds exit transverse velocity times $L/v$. Thus the displacement magnitudes measured separately with only electric field or only magnetic field areThe electric expression follows from constant transverse acceleration; the magnetic expression uses its small-deflection approximation. Equal displacement magnitudes then giveThis is an ideal derivation of the comparison principle, not a numerical reanalysis of the historical tube. Different exterior magnetic field profiles invalidate cancellation of the common geometrical factor. The comparison determines $e/m$ through deflection and the known apparatus dimensions; it does not require a downstream semicircle.

For a second, deliberately different teaching geometry, combine a velocity selector with a separate region containing only a uniform magnetic field $B_a$ perpendicular to the selected velocity. Here $B_s$ belongs to the velocity selector, while $B_a$ belongs to the analyzer: they need not be equal. The magnetic Lorentz force supplies the centripetal acceleration, soIf the analyzer turns the beam through a semicircle before it hits a screen in the entry plane, the separation $D$ between entrance and impact is the diameter: $r=D/2$. For a shorter observed arc, the screen displacement is not generally a radius; fit the appropriate circle geometry. This two-stage velocity selector and curvature apparatus is an original ideal teaching model, not a claim that Thomson's Fig. 2 used a separate selector and semicircular analyzer.

For a worked example, stipulate $E=2.00\times 10^3\mathrm{V}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $B_s=1.00\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{T}$, $B_a=2.00\times 10^{-4}\mathrm{T}$, and $D=0.1136\mathrm{m}$. The selected speed and inferred charge-to-mass ratio magnitude areThe SI units provide an independent check: $(V/m)/\mathrm{T}=m/s$ and $(m/s)/(\mathrm{T}\mathrm{m})=C/kg$, because $\mathrm{T}=kg/(\mathrm{C}\mathrm{s})$. The charge-to-mass ratio of the electron is negative; this calculation gives its magnitude. The bending direction gives the sign of the electric charge once the magnetic field direction is known. Scaling both $e$ and $m$ by the same positive factor preserves every displayed trajectory, so an independent electric charge measurement is required to determine mass separately.

The curvature formula assumes nonrelativistic momentum $p=mv$. At higher speeds, the relativistic cyclotron orbit gives $p=\gamma mv=e{B}_{a}r$, hence $e/m=\gamma v/(B_{a}r)$, where $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor; the ideal straight-through selection $v=E/B_s$ still follows from vanishing Lorentz force. The stipulated speed is about $0.0067$ times the speed of light, making $\gamma -1$ about $2.2\times 10^{-5}$. For this example the nonrelativistic approximation is adequate, but no massive particle can be selected at $E/B_s\ge c$. Finite slit widths, collisions with residual gas, uncertain magnetic field calibration, and fields outside the ideal boundaries limit a real inference; repeat at several selected speeds and analyzer strengths to test consistency of $e/m$ rather than trusting one spot position.

Reuse the velocity selector analysis in the Thomson charge-to-mass experiment, but now send positive ions with $q=ze$ into a separate magnetic analyzer. The selector fields $E_s$ and $B_s$ give $v_0=E_s/B_s$. If the analyzer field $B_a$ is perpendicular to the selected velocity, its gyroradius givesfor a semicircular return to the entrance plane. The displayed impact separation $D$ is a diameter. This formula is linear in $r$ at fixed selected speed; the fixed-electric potential difference model above instead gives $m/q\propto r^2$. They impose different experimental conditions.

For a chosen example, take $E_s=2.00\times 10^{4}V/m$, $B_s=0.200\mathrm{T}$, and $B_a=0.500\mathrm{T}$. Thus $v_0=1.00\times 10^{5}m/s$. Approximating an ion mass by $24\mathrm{u}$ and setting $q=e$ gives $r\approx 49.75\mathrm{mm}$ and $D\approx 99.50\mathrm{mm}$. Here $\mathrm{u}$ denotes the unified atomic mass unit. These are stipulated teaching inputs, not a reported Aston measurement or an exact magnesium atomic mass.

A finite accepted speed range broadens the radius distribution. At fixed $m/q$ and $B_a$, $\delta r/r=\delta v/v$. At fixed electric charge and mass, $K=m{v}^2/2$ gives $\delta v/v\simeq \delta K/(2K)$ for a small kinetic energy spread. A one-percent kinetic energy spread therefore produces roughly a half-percent radius spread before other broadening is included. Its width convention must be specified before converting that statement into a mass resolving power.