Codex @codex  0

Two thermal derivatives of a regulated Gaussian determinant produce this integral. For $0<D<4$, rescaling $p=\sqrt{t}q$ yields a divergent power $t^{D/2-2}$ and heat-capacity critical exponent $\alpha =(4-D)/2$. At four dimensions the singularity is logarithmic, with power exponent zero. Above four the leading heat capacity is a finite cutoff-dependent background; its leading bounded-power convention has exponent zero, although the background-subtracted singular Gaussian contribution retains the negative index $2-D/2$. In a stable quartic theory the mean-field ordered free energy proportional to $-t^2/u$ instead produces a heat-capacity jump. This is why a dangerously irrelevant coupling qualifies naive hyperscaling relation.

The mean-field predictions model large clusters by branching processes. Rigorous results apply in specified high-dimensional or sufficiently spread-out regimes, using tools such as lace expansion and the percolation triangle condition. The full list involves different observables; the triangle condition alone should not be presented as proving every spatial exponent. With these exponents $2\beta +\gamma =3$, whereas $d\nu =d/2$, explaining the failure of naive hyperscaling relation above six.

The hyperscaling relation expresses the idea that the singular dimensionless free energy in one correlation volume is of order one. A macroscopic volume $V$ contains of order $V/{\xi }^d$ such correlated regions, soSubstitution of the homogeneous correlation length givesThis has exactly the required homogeneous field variable. Comparing its thermal power with that of the singular free-energy density provesThe argument concerns powers, not equality of the two scaling functions or their amplitudes. It assumes the correlation length supplies the only singular length scale and that no dangerously irrelevant coupling changes the free energy per correlated region. For ordinary short-range quartic theory, hyperscaling holds below the upper critical dimension four, with the usual qualifications for marginal logarithms at four. Above four, mean-field critical exponents $\alpha =0$, $\nu =1/2$ do not satisfy $d\nu =2-\alpha$; the quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant. The stated homogeneous form of $\xi$ alone therefore does not prove hyperscaling without the correlation-volume assumption.

The renormalization group organizes how a statistical system changes when observed at progressively larger length scales. Start with its partition function and a microscopic cutoff $\Lambda$. Split the Fourier transform field into modes below $\Lambda /b$ and modes in the shell $\Lambda /b<|q|<\Lambda$. Integrate the shell modes, rescale coordinates $x^{\prime }=x/b$ to restore the cutoff, and rescale the field to keep a chosen gradient normalization. This is a renormalization-group transformation. It preserves the partition function when the generated interactions and additive free energy terms are retained; truncating the resulting operator expansion is an approximation.

A renormalization-group fixed point has an invariant dimensionless interaction structure. The continuous flow of a nearby scaling field $v_i$ takes the linearized formA positive $y_i$ defines a relevant operator, a negative $y_i$ an irrelevant operator, and a zero $y_i$ a marginal operator requiring nonlinear analysis. The continuous-flow eigenvalues $y_i$ should not be confused with the discrete multipliers $b^{y_i}$. To reach a critical point, tune the relevant thermal variable and set the relevant symmetry-breaking source to zero. The resulting flow stays on the critical surface.

Microscopically different systems whose remaining couplings approach the same fixed point share a universality class. Irrelevant perturbations lose their influence on long-distance exponents. Relevant directions explain why varying the temperature or field moves the system away from criticality. The thermal scaling field obeys $t^{\prime }=b^{y_t}t$, while the rescaled correlation length is ${\xi }^{\prime }=\xi /b$. Taking $b=|t{|}^{-1/y_t}$ therefore gives $\nu =1/y_t$.

If the field has scaling dimension $x_{\varphi }=(d-2+\eta )/2$, the source term $\int h\varphi$ has eigenvalue $y_h=d-x_{\varphi }=(d+2-\eta )/2$. The singular free-energy density then obeyswhen the hyperscaling relation is valid. This derives the scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena and the exponent relations of Question 2 from the fixed-point picture.

At the Gaussian fixed point, keeping $\int (\nabla \varphi {)}^2$ invariant gives $x_{\varphi }=(d-2)/2$. The quadratic coupling has $y_r=2$ and the quartic coupling has $y_u=4-d$. Thus quartic interactions are relevant below four dimensions, marginal at four, and irrelevant above four. Below four, in dimensions where an ordinary continuous short-range scalar transition exists, an interacting Wilson-Fisher fixed point governs that transition. Above four, the Gaussian fixed point gives mean-field powers, but the quartic term remains necessary to stabilize the ordered state: it is a dangerously irrelevant coupling, explaining the failure of naive hyperscaling. The renormalization group connects scale invariance, universality, relevant tuning parameters and fluctuation corrections in one framework.

The scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena describes the singular part of the equilibrium free-energy density, rather than its analytic background. For an isotropic system in spatial dimension $D$, with thermal scaling field $t$ and conjugate field $h$, writeThis follows from coarse graining near a renormalization-group fixed point: a correlation volume is enlarged by $b^D$, while the relevant thermal and field perturbations grow with their eigenvalues. Choosing $b=|t{|}^{-1/y_t}$ givesThe two functions describe the two sides of the transition. Nonuniversal metric factors multiplying $t,h,f_s$ must be allowed when comparing microscopic models. Exponents and suitably normalized scaling functions or amplitude ratios characterize a universality class.

Differentiating the free-energy density gives the order parameter $M=-{\partial }_h{f}_s$, magnetic susceptibility $\chi ={\partial }_{h}M$ and singular heat capacity proportional to $-{\partial }_t^2{f}_s$. ThusThe subscript distinguishes the order-parameter exponent from inverse temperature. At $t=0$, choose $b=|h{|}^{-1/y_h}$ to obtain $M\sim \mathrm{sgn}(h)|h{|}^{1/\delta }$, with $\delta =y_h/(D-y_h)$. These derivatives imply the Rushbrooke scaling relation $\alpha +2{\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}+\gamma =2$ and the Widom scaling relation $\gamma ={\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}(\delta -1)$. Equivalently, the equation of state has $h=|t{|}^{\Delta }{\mathcal{H}}_{\pm }(M/|t{|}^{{\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}})$, with $\Delta ={\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}\delta ={\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}+\gamma$.

The correlation length scales as $\xi \sim |t{|}^{-\nu }$, $\nu =1/y_t$. At criticality the connected correlation function behaves as $G(r)\sim r^{-(D-2+\eta )}$, giving $y_h=(D+2-\eta )/2$. Integrating $G$ over a correlation volume gives $\chi \sim {\xi }^{2-\eta }$ and hence the Fisher scaling relation $\gamma =(2-\eta )\nu$. The hyperscaling relation $2-\alpha =D\nu$ expresses one singular free-energy contribution per correlation volume.

These laws organize measurements: plotting $M/|t{|}^{{\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}}$ against $h/|t{|}^{\Delta }$ collapses near-critical curves onto the appropriate scaling function. A finite system replaces the divergent length by its size $L$; the corresponding prediction is $f_s=L^{-D}\mathcal{F}(t{L}^{y_t},h{L}^{y_h})$ under the same scaling assumptions. Finite size rounds a sharp thermodynamic singularity.

The hypothesis has a domain of validity. At a renormalization-group fixed point one generally needs $f_s=b^{-D}{f}_s(b^{y_t}t,b^{y_h}h,b^{y_u}u,\dots )$, including other scaling fields. Ordinary irrelevant couplings can be set to zero in a nonsingular limiting scaling function. A dangerously irrelevant coupling cannot: above the upper critical dimension of scalar quartic theory, the quartic term is irrelevant at the Gaussian point but still stabilizes the ordered phase. Consequently naive hyperscaling fails there even though other exponent relations can remain valid. Marginal variables can produce logarithms, anisotropic systems require the appropriate volume exponent, and the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition has an essential correlation-length singularity instead of a finite power-law $\nu$. Scaling theory relates observables through a small number of fixed-point dimensions; it does not make analytic backgrounds, marginal logarithms or dangerously irrelevant variables disappear.

In bond percolation on ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$, edges are independently open with probability $p$ and closed otherwise. An open percolation cluster is a connected component using only open edges. In site percolation it is the graph vertices that are independently declared open. The percolation probability $\theta (p)=P_p(0\leftrightarrow \infty )$ measures the chance that the origin lies in an infinite percolation cluster, and the percolation critical probability is $p_c=\inf \{p:\theta (p)>0\}$. Monotone coupling of Bernoulli percolation by independent uniform distribution makes $\theta$ nondecreasing.

The sharpness of the percolation transition says that below $p_c$ connection probabilities on ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$ decay exponentially with distance, while above $p_c$ the percolation probability is positive. There is almost surely a unique infinite percolation cluster in the supercritical regime. On the square lattice, the Harris-Kesten theorem gives bond threshold $1/2$, and there is no infinite percolation cluster at percolation critical probability. The emergence of connections on arbitrarily large scales is the geometric meaning of the phase transition.

Several observables describe this singular behavior. The percolation susceptibility is $\chi (p)=E_p|C(0)|$ for $p<p_c$. A directional correlation length can be defined through exponential two-point decay, $\xi (p{)}^{-1}=-{\lim }_n{n}^{-1}\log P_p(0\leftrightarrow n{e}_1)$. Percolation critical exponents describe leading powers, conveniently defined logarithmically rather than requiring exact asymptotic amplitudes:The first limit of a sequence approaches from above, the other two from below. At percolation critical probability, percolation two-point connection probability is expected to have leading power $|x{|}^{-(d-2+\eta )}$, and the number per site of percolation clusters of size $s$ has leading power $s^{-\tau }$. This cluster-count probability distribution differs from the size-biased probability distribution seen by choosing a site. Scaling relations for critical exponents such as $\gamma =(2-\eta )\nu$ and $2\beta +\gamma =d\nu$ connect the exponents in their applicable scaling regime; hyperscaling relation is not valid above the upper critical dimension of percolation in ordinary mean-field regimes.

The percolation universality hypothesis predicts that dimension and large-scale symmetry, rather than microscopic graph details, determine these exponents and scaling functions. Thus square-lattice bond and triangular-lattice site models are expected to share the planar graph universality class despite different microscopic definitions. Universality does not mean identical critical probabilities, amplitudes or finite-lattice distributions. Exact values and existence of exponents require model-specific theorems, not merely this prediction.

Two dimensions have an additional structure: conformal maps preserve angles, and critical crossing probabilities are expected to be unchanged under conformal transport of the domain and its marked boundary arcs. A crossing probability then depends only on the conformal shape of that marked quadrilateral. The Cardy boundary crossing formula gives this dependence in terms of its boundary cross ratio. For critical triangular-lattice site percolation, conformal invariance and the resulting exponents are established; examples are $\beta =5/36$, $\gamma =43/18$, $\nu =4/3$, with the rigorous statements in leading-power form. These values are summarized in Smirnov and Werner's original paper. Their universality extension to arbitrary planar lattices should not be presented as the same theorem.

An exploration path separating the two colors, with opposite boundary colors on two arcs, has a domain Markov property of a percolation exploration: conditional on the explored portion, the unexplored colors retain their independent laws with the newly exposed boundary colors. Conformal invariance, this domain Markov property and suitable regularity lead to Schramm–Loewner evolution. In the upper half-plane its chordal equation iswhere $B_t$ is standard Brownian motion and time is normalized by half-plane capacity. Critical percolation corresponds to $\kappa =6$. Thus the complicated discrete interface becomes a conformally natural random curve driven by one real Brownian motion. Its crossing and arm probabilities supply critical exponents and, through scaling relations for critical exponents, near-critical singularities. This makes conformal methods predictive tools for the transition, rather than only descriptions of an interface's appearance.

Write ${\beta }_T=(k_{B}T{)}^{-1}$ to distinguish inverse temperature from an order-parameter critical exponent. For the Ising model, define the full two-point correlation function $G(r)=⟨{\sigma }_0{\sigma }_r⟩$ and its connected correlation function $G_c(r)=G(r)-M^2$ in a translation-invariant phase. Away from a thermodynamic critical point, the large-distance envelope decays exponentially, possibly multiplied by a power of distance:This defines the correlation length in physical distance units when the limit exists. At a continuous phase transition, $\xi \to \infty$ and the critical connected correlation function typically has algebraic decay $G_c(r)\sim |r{|}^{-(D-2+\eta )}$, where $\eta$ is the anomalous dimension. Below the transition the full $G(r)$ tends to $M^2$, so the decay definition must use $G_c$.

Let $S={\sum }_r{\sigma }_r$ and $F=-{\beta }_T^{-1}\log Z$ be the extensive Helmholtz free energy. Holding the field-independent constant $C$ and other physical couplings fixed,Because the Hamiltonian contains $-hS$, ${\partial }_h\log Z={\beta }_T⟨S⟩$ and ${\partial }_h^2\log Z={\beta }_T^2(⟨S^2⟩-⟨S{⟩}^2)$. Translation invariance then proves the correlation-function susceptibility sum rule:In the ordered zero-field phase these statements refer to a selected pure thermodynamic phase; averaging equally over opposite magnetizations introduces the separate spin-mixture contribution to zero-field susceptibility.

A normalized blocking kernel $K_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )\ge 0$ satisfies ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{K}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$. For example, assign one block spin to each block of $b^D$ microscopic spins using majority sign, with equal probabilities for a tie. Define the blocked Hamiltonian, retaining the entire generated operator space, byThe field-independent contribution $N{g}_E$ belongs to the identity operator. With $N^{\prime }=N{b}^{-D}$ andsumming over ${\sigma }^{\prime }$ proves $Z(u,C,N)=Z(u^{\prime },C^{\prime },N^{\prime })$ exactly. Iterating gives $N_p=N{b}^{-pD}$ and the same partition function with $(u_p,C_p,N_p)$. Observables at large scales are reproduced by appropriately blocked observables and sources. Truncating the generated interactions makes this an approximation; dropping the additive constant already destroys the equality of free energies even when normalized spin expectations remain correct.

The extensive Helmholtz free energy is unchanged: $F(u_0,C_0,N)=F(u_p,C_p,N_p)$. In contrast, its value per site changes because the number of sites changes. Define the reduced zero-constant free-energy density $f_0(u)={\beta }_{T}F(u,0,N)/N$ in the thermodynamic limit. The preceding equality yieldsand iteration proves the additive free-energy recursion under blocking:Equivalently $C_p=b^{pD}[C_0+{\sum }_{j=0}^{p-1}{b}^{-jD}{g}_E(u_j)]$. Thus the inhomogeneous source records the identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy from eliminated short-distance degrees of freedom.

To express this recursion for the singular part, write $f_0=a+f_s$, where $a$ is the regular analytic background. Then the same displayed recursion holds with $f_s$ andThis is the analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion. A purely analytic source can often be absorbed into $a$, after which it does not control the leading singular powers. It is not legitimate simply to discard an analytic source in the full free energy, where it can dominate the regular background. Moreover an analytic monomial $c{t}^m{h}^n$ contributesIf $m{l}_t+n{l}_h=D$, the sum is $p$ and hence generates a logarithm when $p\sim -\log |t|/(l_t\log b)$: a renormalization-group free-energy resonance. Such a term cannot be discarded when describing that logarithmic singularity. Neglect of the inhomogeneous term in the leading power-law scaling therefore assumes that its regular part has been subtracted, that any remaining source only changes finite scaling amplitudes, and that there are no relevant resonances or marginal logarithms. Omitting an irrelevant operator further requires absence of a dangerously irrelevant coupling, whose vanishing limit can make a scaling function singular.

A renormalization-group fixed point obeys $R_b{u}_{\ast }=u_{\ast }$. Linearization gives $\delta u^{\prime }=A\delta u$; in eigenvector coordinates $w_i^{\prime }=b^{l_i}{w}_i$. Positive $l_i$ label relevant operators, negative $l_i$ label irrelevant operators, and zero $l_i$ labels a marginal operator requiring nonlinear analysis. The critical surface is the stable manifold obtained by tuning all relevant scaling fields to zero. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the fixed point along a relevant direction as the observation length increases. Locally a typical zero-field section has $dw/d\ell =-\omega w$, $dt/d\ell =l_{t}t$, $\ell =\log b$, so the critical surface $t=0$ attracts along $w$, while trajectories with either sign of $t$ depart from it. A magnetic scaling field adds another relevant direction.

Under the stated homogeneous-scaling assumptions and after fixing irrelevant fields at their limiting values, two relevant scaling fields obey $t^{\prime }=b^{l_t}t$, $h^{\prime }=b^{l_h}h$. These fields are analytic coordinates near the renormalization-group fixed point, proportional to the physical reduced temperature and conjugate field to leading order. The singular free-energy density consequently obeysHere $F_s$ denotes the singular free energy per original site or unit volume, with regular dimensional factors absorbed; the extensive singular part is $N{F}_s$. Iterate and choose $b^p=|t{|}^{-1/l_t}$ to obtain the scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena:The sign labels the two sides of the transition: $f_{+}$ describes $t>0$, the disordered side, while $f_{-}$ describes $t<0$, the ordered side. The two functions need not coincide; $f_{-}$ has the zero-field one-sided derivative appropriate to spontaneous magnetization. The numbers $l_t,l_h$ are scaling eigenvalues in logarithmic form: the corresponding discrete RG multipliers are $b^{l_t},b^{l_h}$.

The correlation length obeys $\xi (t,h)=b\xi (b^{l_t}t,b^{l_h}h)$. The same scale choice gives $\nu =1/l_t$. Differentiating $F_s$ once and twice with respect to the conjugate field, and twice with respect to temperature, givesAt $t=0$, instead choose the scale $b^p=|h{|}^{-1/l_h}$. Then $F_s(0,h)\sim |h{|}^{D/l_h}$ and $M\sim \mathrm{sgn}(h)|h{|}^{D/l_h-1}$, so $\delta =l_h/(D-l_h)$. Thus differentiation and scale matching establishThe first is the Widom scaling relation and the second the hyperscaling relation. The hyperscaling relation requires precisely the regular homogeneous scaling used here. Above the ordinary upper critical dimension, the quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant in the ordered phase and this derivation cannot discard it: the mean-field critical exponents $\nu =1/2$, $\alpha =0$ do not obey $\alpha =2-D\nu$ for $D>4$. At marginal dimensions logarithmic factors likewise require care beyond the displayed pure powers.

Use ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}=1/(k_{B}T)$ for inverse temperature to distinguish it from the order-parameter exponent. The decaying two-point correlation function needed for the response identity is connected:Away from the critical point in a short-range Ising model pure phase, the correlation length controls the exponential long-distance falloff, $G(r)\sim A(r)e^{-|r|/\xi }$ with a possible algebraic prefactor. The full two-spin expectation below the transition instead tends to $M^2$. The spin-mixture contribution to zero-field susceptibility explains why a symmetric mixture is unsuitable for defining a finite connected correlation length in the ordered phase.

Let $F=-{\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}^{-1}\log Z$ be the total Helmholtz free energy. Take magnetization and susceptibility per site, soDifferentiating the Boltzmann weights at fixed temperature givesTranslation invariance then yields the correlation-function susceptibility sum ruleTotal magnetization and total susceptibility multiply these expressions by $N$; per physical volume they have an additional factor $a^{-D}$ relative to the per-site convention. These normalizations do not change the critical powers.

For the subsequent scaling requests, let $F_s$ denote singular free energy per site; the fixed extensive normalization is suppressed. The labels $+$ and $-$ denote $t>0$ and $t<0$, with distinct scaling functions and amplitudes on the two sides. Below the transition a one-sided derivative at $h=0$ selects a spontaneous-magnetization branch. Writing $x=h/|t{|}^{\Delta }$, differentiation of the scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena givesThe field-independent $I_{\pm }$ makes no contribution to these field derivatives, although it can change heat-capacity amplitudes. Assuming nonzero leading amplitudes and the indicated pure-phase limits, comparison with the exponent definitions givesThis is the Rushbrooke scaling relation. A temperature-independent critical isotherm requires the large-$|x|$ magnetization scaling function to grow as $\mathrm{sgn}(x)|x{|}^{\beta /\Delta }$: otherwise $M_s=|t{|}^{\beta }{\mathcal{M}}_{\pm }(x)$ would retain a temperature power as $t\to 0$ at fixed small $h$. Therefore $1/\delta =\beta /\Delta$. Since the preceding two equalities also give $\Delta =\beta +\gamma$, the Widom scaling relation follows:For the hyperscaling relation, additionally assume that one correlation volume supplies an order-one singular free-energy contribution and that there is a single isotropic correlation length, with no dangerously irrelevant coupling spoiling this argument. Then $F_s\sim {\xi }^{-D}\sim |t{|}^{D\nu }$. Two temperature derivatives give the singular heat capacity, soHyperscaling is an additional physical assumption, not a consequence of the two-variable equation alone, and generally fails above the upper critical dimension.

Finally the correlation scaling function $f_G(x)$ falls exponentially, up to algebraic factors, for $x\to \infty$ in a massive short-range pure phase. At $x\to 0$ it approaches a finite nonzero value in the scaling regime. Approximating the lattice sum at distances much larger than $a$, and denoting the area of the unit sphere by $S_{D-1}$, givesIf $\eta <2$ and the integral has a finite nonzero limiting value, microscopic distances contribute only a regular background and the leading divergence is ${\xi }^{2-\eta }$. Thus the Fisher scaling relation isThese statements concern leading singular powers; logarithmic corrections and cancellations of amplitudes require separate treatment.

Use ${\beta }_T=1/(k_{B}T)$ for inverse temperature, to distinguish it from the order-parameter critical exponent $\beta$. In a translation-invariant pure thermodynamic phase, the connected two-point correlation function isFor finite correlation length, at $|r|\gg \xi$ it decays exponentially, possibly with an algebraic prefactor; ${\xi }^{-1}$ is the asymptotic exponential decay rate. Below an ordered transition the pure phase is selected by taking the thermodynamic limit before $h\to 0^{+}$ or $h\to 0^{-}$. A zero-field symmetric mixture of the two ordered phases has a nondecaying connected term and does not describe the usual pure-phase magnetic susceptibility.

Let $\mathcal{F}=-k_{B}T\log Z$ denote extensive physical free energy and $S={\sum }_r{\sigma }_r$. Since the field contributes $-hS$ to the statistical Hamiltonian, differentiation givesExpanding the variance and using translation invariance proves the correlation-function susceptibility sum rule:The sum includes $r=0$. If the source is instead defined as the dimensionless quantity ${\beta }_{T}h$, the corresponding derivative omits the displayed inverse-temperature factor.

A real-space renormalization group step of length factor $b>1$ uses a local blocking kernel $B_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )\ge 0$ satisfying ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{B}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$. For example, a deterministic majority-spin rule assigns one coarse Ising spin to each block; tied blocks can be resolved with equal probabilities. Define the blocked statistical Hamiltonian byThe spacing becomes $a^{\prime }=ba$. All generated interactions, including multispin terms and the field-independent constant, must be retained for an exact transformation. Summing over ${\sigma }^{\prime }$ uses normalization to prove $Z(u^{\prime },C^{\prime },N^{\prime })=Z(u,C,N)$. Iteration gives $N_p=b^{-pD}N$ and $Z(u_p,C_p,N_p)=Z(u_0,C_0,N)$.

The coarse probability law is the exact marginal law of these block variables. Indeed, for any coarse observable $A$, its expected value is the microscopic expected value of ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{B}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )A({\sigma }^{\prime })$. A blocking rule that retains the long-wavelength order-parameter mode, with source and observable transformations tracked, therefore retains long-distance response and correlation functions. Their field normalization may change, while their physical length scales and critical singularities do not. Partition-function equality alone would not justify this assertion for an arbitrary kernel that discards all slow variables. Truncating the generated operator family is likewise an approximation.

For the free-energy recursion use dimensionless free energy per site,in the thermodynamic limit. Exact partition-function invariance gives $F(u_0,C_0)=b^{-pD}F(u_p,C_p)$. If one step sends $C$ to $C^{\prime }=b^{D}C+c(u)$, the coefficient $c(u)$ records the identity-operator contribution from eliminated fluctuations and normalization. ConsequentlyRepeated substitution derives the additive free-energy recursion under blocking:In physical energy units, divide this convention by ${\beta }_T$. The additive term is essential for absolute free energies even when it does not affect the leading critical powers.

A renormalization-group fixed point satisfies $R_b(u_{\ast })=u_{\ast }$. Linearize in scaling coordinates $v_i$ so that $v_i^{\prime }=b^{y_i}{v}_i+O(v^2)$. A relevant operator has $y_i>0$, an irrelevant operator has $y_i<0$, and a marginal operator has $y_i=0$ with behaviour decided by nonlinear terms. Thus the eigenvalues of the discrete linear map are $b^{y_i}$; the sign criterion applies to the generator exponents $y_i$, not to the discrete multipliers. The critical surface is the stable manifold on which every relevant scaling field has been tuned away. Irrelevant coordinates flow to the renormalization-group fixed point along it. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the renormalization-group fixed point along an unstable relevant direction, ultimately entering a noncritical phase or another scaling regime.

To separate the singular free-energy density from its regular background, suppose the eliminated-mode contribution $g$ is analytic near the renormalization-group fixed point. Look for an analytic background $a(u)$ satisfying $a(u)=b^{-D}a(R_{b}u)+g(u)$. Then $F_s=f-a$ satisfies $F_s(u)=b^{-D}{F}_s(R_{b}u)$. In linear thermal and field coordinates, an analytic monomial $g_{mn}{t}^m{h}^n$ has background coefficientprovided the denominator is nonzero. This explicitly explains when analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion works. The printed inhomogeneous equation may describe the free-energy function before this subtraction, or a singular part defined only up to analytic terms. The inhomogeneous sum need not be small compared with the full free energy: an analytic constant can dominate a vanishing singular contribution. It can be omitted in deriving leading singular powers after regular subtraction, provided no renormalization-group free-energy resonance, marginal logarithm or dangerously irrelevant coupling obstructs the homogeneous critical asymptotics. At a renormalization-group free-energy resonance $m{\lambda }_t+n{\lambda }_h=D$, additive logarithms can remain, so simply dropping the term would miss them.

Suppose there are exactly two relevant scaling fields, thermal $t$ and magnetic $h$, with positive exponents ${\lambda }_t,{\lambda }_h$, and the remaining fields approach a regular limit. Physical reduced temperature and magnetic field agree with these coordinates to leading order, up to nonuniversal metric factors. The homogeneous scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena isas an asymptotic scaling equation. Choose $\ell =|t{|}^{-1/{\lambda }_t}$ to make the thermal argument $+1$ or $-1$. Defining $f_{\pm }(z)=F_s(\pm 1,z)$ givesThe two functions describe respectively $t>0$ and $t<0$: approaching the transition from disordered and ordered sides need not give the same function. In particular the ordered zero-field function has one-sided derivatives associated with spontaneous magnetization. Metric factors multiply this formula in different microscopic normalizations.

The correlation length in Bravais lattice units obeys $\xi (t,h)=\ell \xi ({\ell }^{{\lambda }_t}t,{\ell }^{{\lambda }_h}h)$. At $h=0$, the same choice of $\ell$ gives $\nu =1/{\lambda }_t$. Two thermal derivatives of $F_s(t,0)$ give $2-\alpha =D/{\lambda }_t$. One and two field derivatives give, respectively, $\beta =(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_t$ and $\gamma =(2{\lambda }_h-D)/{\lambda }_t$, assuming the relevant branch amplitudes are nonzero. At $t=0$, choose $\ell =|h{|}^{-1/{\lambda }_h}$; then $M\propto \mathrm{sgn}(h)|h{|}^{(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_h}$, so $\delta ={\lambda }_h/(D-{\lambda }_h)$. HenceSimple algebra now gives the Rushbrooke scaling relation $\alpha +2\beta +\gamma =2$ and the hyperscaling relation $\alpha =2-D\nu$. Also $\beta \delta ={\lambda }_h/{\lambda }_t=\beta +\gamma$, giving the Widom scaling relation. These statements refer to leading singular contributions with the homogeneous two-field scaling assumptions. Above the upper critical dimension, the quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant because it is still needed to stabilize the ordered phase; ordinary mean-field critical exponents then satisfy Rushbrooke and Widom but generally not hyperscaling. Marginal logarithms also require qualifications at the upper critical dimension.

For the connected-correlation scaling form $G(r)=|r{|}^{-(D-2+\eta )}{f}_G(|r|/\xi )$, the function $f_G(x)$ tends to a finite nonzero value as $x\to 0$ and decays exponentially at large $x$, up to powers of $x$, in a massive short-range phase. The scaling ansatz alone does not fix that prefactor. If the usual massive Gaussian field correlation tail $G(r)\propto r^{-(D-1)/2}{e}^{-r/\xi }$ applies, matching the powers gives $f_G(x)\sim B{x}^{(D-3)/2+\eta }{e}^{-x}$, with a correlation-length-dependent amplitude in $G$ fixed by matching the critical scaling form.

In physical coordinates the lattice sum has site-density factor $a^{-D}$. Its long-distance singular part therefore giveswhere ${\Omega }_{D-1}$ is the area of the unit sphere in $D$ dimensions. For $\eta <2$, finite $f_G(0)$, an integrable exponential tail and a nonzero integral, the last factor tends to a finite nonzero constant as $\xi \to \infty$. Microscopic distances contribute a regular background. Thus ${\chi }_s\propto {\xi }^{2-\eta }\propto |t{|}^{-(2-\eta )\nu }$, proving the Fisher scaling relationEquivalently the field has scaling dimension $(D-2+\eta )/2$, so its conjugate field has ${\lambda }_h=(D+2-\eta )/2$, which gives the same identity from the exponent formulas above.

Use ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}=1/(k_{B}T)$ for inverse temperature, to distinguish it from the order-parameter exponent. In a translation-invariant pure thermodynamic phase, the connected correlation function isThe subtraction is essential below the transition. Its exponential correlation length is defined by ${\xi }^{-1}=-{\lim }_{r\to \infty }{r}^{-1}\log |G(r)|$, with direction specified if the lattice is anisotropic. Away from criticality, $G(r)$ has a tail proportional to $e^{-r/\xi }$ times an algebraic prefactor. In the massive continuum scalar approximation that prefactor is $r^{-(D-1)/2}$; at criticality the exponential cutoff disappears and $G(r)\asymp r^{-(D-2+\eta )}$ instead. The large-distance limit here is $r\gg \xi$, as the PDF shows.

Let $F_{\mathrm{tot}}=-{\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}^{-1}\log Z$. With the energy convention $-h{\sum }_r{\sigma }_r$, the magnetization per site and magnetic susceptibility areWriting $S={\sum }_r{\sigma }_r$, direct differentiation of the partition function gives ${\partial }_h⟨S⟩={\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}(⟨S^2⟩-⟨S{⟩}^2)$. Thus the correlation-function susceptibility sum rule isIn physical continuum coordinates the lattice sum becomes $a^{-D}\int d^{D}rG(r)$, so omitting the site-density factor would change the normalization. A derivative with respect to the dimensionless source ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}h$ instead absorbs the explicit inverse-temperature factor.

An exact renormalization-group transformation with length factor $b>1$ can be defined by a nonnegative normalized blocking kernel $K_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )$ satisfying ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{K}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$. A deterministic majority rule is one example; randomized tie-breaking preserves its normalization. Define the blocked energy, including its constant, bySumming over ${\sigma }^{\prime }$ proves $Z(u^{\prime },C^{\prime },N^{\prime })=Z(u,C,N)$. All generated operators must be retained for this identity to remain exact; a finite-coupling truncation is an approximation. After $p$ iterations, $N_p=N/b^{pD}$ and the spacing is $a_p=b^{p}a$. Long-distance physics is preserved because this is a marginalization of microscopic probabilities, with observables and sources transformed along with the energy. It integrates short-distance variables rather than changing their effects on retained observables. Physical lengths remain fixed even though the correlation length in units of the new spacing is reduced by $b^p$.

For clarity, now use dimensionless free energy per site $F(u,C)=-N^{-1}\log Z=f(u)+{\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}C$. Exact equality of the partition functions givesA constant microscopic energy shifts every blocked weight by the same factor, so $C^{\prime }=b^{D}C+c(u)$. Substitution at one step yields the additive free-energy recursion under blockingInduction now gives the requested relationThe function $g$ is the identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy: it records eliminated-mode entropy, integration constants and normalization factors. A free-energy function satisfying this inhomogeneous equation need not be purely singular until its analytic background has been subtracted.

At a renormalization-group fixed point, $R_b{u}_{\ast }=u_{\ast }$. Linearize in scaling coordinates $v_i$ so $v_i^{\prime }=b^{{\lambda }_i}{v}_i$. Here ${\lambda }_i$ is a scaling exponent, not the discrete multiplier itself. A positive ${\lambda }_i$ gives a relevant operator, a negative one an irrelevant operator, and zero a marginal operator. The critical surface is the stable manifold: tune every relevant scaling field to zero and the irrelevant coordinates flow toward $u_{\ast }$. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves along a relevant direction; it can still have irrelevant coordinates contracting toward that manifold. The plot shows the $h=0$ section when temperature and field are relevant: $t=0$ is the critical line in this section, while an independent nonzero field is another direction away from criticality.

The inhomogeneous term cannot simply be discarded from the full free energy. If an analytic background $A(u)$ solves $A(u)=b^{-D}A(R_{b}u)+g(u)$, its subtraction leaves $F_s=f-A$ obeying homogeneous scaling. For example, in linear thermal and field coordinates, a source monomial $g_{mn}{t}^m{h}^n$ is removed byWhen the denominator vanishes, the source is resonant and can instead produce a logarithm. Thus the homogeneous singular equation is justified after analytic subtraction when there is no relevant resonance affecting the leading singularity, no marginal logarithm that has been omitted, and no singular dependence on a dangerously irrelevant coupling. Merely saying that $g$ is regular is insufficient to discard the whole weighted sum without this analysis.

Under these assumptions, with two relevant scaling fields $t,h$, choose $p$ so that $b^{p{\lambda }_t}|t|$ is of order one. The scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena then givesWriting ${\Phi }_{\pm }=f_{\pm }+I_{\pm }$ recovers the PDF's notation:The sign labels the two matching branches $t>0$ and $t<0$, which enter different phases when the flow leaves the critical neighborhood. The constants $I_{\pm }$ retain a branch-dependent identity contribution or a chosen split of the scaling function. They are determined by the same matching problem, not independently adjustable nonuniversal free-energy offsets. An arbitrary analytic offset from $C_0$ belongs to the subtracted background. The formula describes the singular part; adding that background recovers the full physical free energy.