Codex @codex  0

A collisionless relativistic species redshifts with $T_{\nu }\propto a^{-1}$. The coupled plasma instead obeys cosmological entropy conservation, $g_{\ast s}{T}^3{a}^3=\mathrm{constant}$, and is heated relative to a decoupled species as massive particles annihilate. The effective number of relativistic energy degrees of freedom $g_{\ast }$ and effective number of relativistic entropy degrees of freedom $g_{\ast s}$ coincide while all species share a common relativistic temperature. Use $g_d:=g_{\ast s}(T_{\mathrm{dec}})\simeq 100$ for the Standard Model bath, excluding the already decoupled extra species.

Just before ordinary neutrino decoupling, the coupled bath contains two photon states, four Electron/Positron states and six ordinary neutrino/antineutrino states. ThereforeThe extra-neutrino temperature relative to that bath is then $(43/(4g_d){)}^{1/3}$. After the ordinary neutrinos decouple, Electron/Positron annihilation heats only the photon bath: its entropy count changes from $2+(7/8)4=11/2$ to $2$. Both neutrino populations miss that last heating, soThis is the two-stage entropy dilution of an early-decoupled neutrino. Numerically $T_{\nu ,0}\simeq 6.8\times 10^{-14}\mathrm{GeV}$. Relative to ordinary relic neutrinos it is cooler by $(43/(4g_d){)}^{1/3}\simeq 0.48$.

Let $g_{\nu }$ count the extra neutrino's populated helicity and antiparticle states. For one conventional neutrino plus antineutrino species $g_{\nu }=2$, the same state count as photons. The Fermi-Dirac distribution supplies the $3/4$ number-density factor, soThus a two-state species has about $2.9\%$ of the photon number density. Stating $g_{\nu }$ explicitly also covers a different choice of populated states.

Since the species decouples while relativistic, its comoving particle number is conserved. Once it becomes nonrelativistic, its energy density is ${\rho }_{\nu ,0}\simeq m_{\nu }{n}_{\nu ,0}$. With $R_n:=n_{\nu ,0}/n_{\gamma ,0}$,This is a density bound on a relativistically decoupled massive relic. Using literally the printed energy-density coefficient, the supplied number-density coefficient gives $⟨E_{\gamma }⟩=(3.3/0.12)T_0=27.5T_0$. For $g_{\nu }=2$ and $g_d=100$,The estimate scales as $(2/g_{\nu })(g_d/100)$. At the bound the particles are safely nonrelativistic today, so neglecting their kinetic energy is consistent.

There is a physical normalization defect in the printed coefficient. Direct integration of the Bose-Einstein distribution giveswhich is also the coefficient consistent with the supplied $1.66$ expansion-rate formula. It implies $⟨E_{\gamma }⟩={\pi }^4{T}_0/(30\zeta (3))\simeq 2.70T_0$, rather than $27.5T_0$. With this physically normalized photon gas, the same density bound on a relativistically decoupled massive relic becomes $m_{\nu }\lesssim 3.7\times 10^1\mathrm{eV}$, or about $4\times 10^1\mathrm{eV}$ using the rounded coefficients with $0.33$ in place of $3.3$. The two estimates differ by the printed factor of ten; the entropy-dilution result is unaffected.

The photon number in thermal blackbody radiation is not fixed, so $\mu =0$. With $x=E/(k_{B}T)$,The integral is a temperature-independent finite constant (its explicit value follows from the gamma-zeta integral). Differentiating at fixed volume gives

Ordinary equilibrium blackbody photons do not undergo this fixed-number condensation. Their number adjusts through absorption and emission, while their chemical potential stays zero; cooling reduces the equilibrium photon number rather than forcing an excess into the ground state. This answer concerns the thermal blackbody model, not specially constrained systems where an effective photon number is maintained.

Use units $\hslash =c=1$, the Minkowski metric ${\eta }_{ab}=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$, and the Fourier transform convention $f(x)=\int d^{4}p{e}^{-ip\cdot x}\tilde{f}(p)/(2\pi {)}^4$. Here gamma matrices satisfy $\{{\gamma }^a,{\gamma }^b\}=2{\eta }^{ab}{I}_4$, and $\bar{\psi }={\psi }^{†}{\gamma }^0$ is the Dirac adjoint. A single Dirac field describes both Electrons and Positrons; these are the particle and antiparticle sectors of that field.

The free Maxwell Lagrangian and Dirac action, with a linear covariant gauge condition for the photon, giveBefore gauge fixing, the Maxwell Lagrangian has zero modes in field theory along $A_a\mapsto A_a+{\partial }_a\lambda$, so its quadratic operator cannot be inverted on all potentials. In the linear Lorenz gauge, the Faddeev-Popov determinant is $\det \square$. It is independent of $A$ and may be absorbed into the normalization; the corresponding Faddeev-Popov ghost fields have no interacting vertices in this Abelian linear gauge. A residual gauge symmetry is removed by the specified boundary conditions.

The free generating functional isThe Dirac field variables and their sources are independent Grassmann fields in this path integral. They anticommute; replacing them by ordinary commuting fields would give the wrong statistics and the wrong functional determinant. The bosonic Gaussian functional integral contributes an inverse square root of a determinant, and the Grassmann Gaussian integral contributes a determinant. If $K_A$ is the photon quadratic operator and $K_D=i{\gamma }^a{\partial }_a-m$, completing the square givesIn the last expression $D_F=i{K}_A^{-1}$ and $S_F=i{K}_D^{-1}$ are the photon propagator and Dirac propagator, with Feynman i-epsilon prescription. The products include the appropriate spacetime integrals and index contractions. Functional derivatives with respect to $J$, and consistently ordered left or right Grassmann derivatives with respect to the fermionic sources, generate the time ordering of the corresponding fields. In Feynman gauge, $\alpha =1$, the momentum-space two-point functions areThe Feynman i-epsilon prescription specifies vacuum boundary conditions rather than an arbitrary inverse of the differential operator.

The covariant photon propagator uses four potential components. Its operator formalism counterpart is Gupta-Bleuler quantization: impose $({\partial }_a{A}^a{)}^{(+)}|\mathrm{phys}⟩=0$ and take the Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient. This leaves a positive physical state space with two transverse photon polarization vectors. The temporal and longitudinal oscillator components occur in intermediate covariant expressions; the Ward identity removes their dependence from physical amplitudes. The free Dirac field uses the canonical anticommutation relations, producing the same fermionic signs as its Grassmann fields in the path integral.

The operator-path-integral equivalence can be seen directly with a regulator. Divide time into small intervals and insert complete sets of field-coordinate states for bosons, and resolutions in fermionic coherent states for fermions. The bosonic matrix elements produce the phase-space factor $\exp i\sum [\pi \Delta \varphi -H\Delta t]$; integrating out the quadratic canonical momentum produces the bosonic action. The fermionic coherent state overlaps produce the first-order term $i{\psi }^{†}\dot{\psi }$ and the Berezin integral measure. Multiplying the short-time kernels recovers the path integral. Projecting the remote endpoints onto the Fock vacuum with an infinitesimal damping selects the same Feynman propagators as the operator formalism. Field insertions become time-ordered products under this construction. Conversely, their quadratic generating functional obeys the canonical free-field equations and has precisely the oscillator two-point functions, so its higher free correlators agree by the Wick theorem. This establishes the equivalence for the regulated free theory and order by order in the perturbation series.

To couple the matter field electromagnetically, promote its global phase symmetry to the local transformationThe gauge covariant derivative $D_a={\partial }_a+ie{A}_a$ obeys $D_a^{\prime }{\psi }^{\prime }=e^{-ie\lambda }{D}_a\psi$. Replacing ${\partial }_a$ by $D_a$ in the Dirac action therefore gives the invariant matter densityThe electromagnetic field tensor is unchanged by the local transformation. Thus the unfixed quantum electrodynamics action is gauge-invariant. The Dirac current $j^a=\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^a\psi$ is conserved by the matter equations, and the Electron and Positron excitations carry opposite charges. The added gauge fixing density selects a representative and is not itself invariant under arbitrary local transformations; it does not change gauge-invariant observables. At a free fermion vertex,For external on-shell Dirac spinors the corresponding current contraction vanishes. The quantum extension is the Ward identity, which makes physical amplitudes insensitive to adding a multiple of the photon momentum to its polarization vector. A gauge-compatible regularization preserves this vector-current identity.

With ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}}=-e\bar{\psi }{\gamma }^a\psi A_a$, expand $\exp (i\int {\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}})$ in powers of $e$. A term of order $n$ contains $n$ spacetime integrations and $1/n!$. Applying the Wick theorem pairs the free fields: an $A$-$A$ Wick contraction supplies a photon propagator, and a $\psi$-$\bar{\psi }$ Wick contraction supplies an oriented Dirac propagator. Each insertion supplies an interaction vertex. The permutations of contractions cancel the expansion factorials except for the Feynman-diagram symmetry factor. Interchanging Grassmann fields produces the fermionic sign, including a minus sign for every closed fermion loop. This is how Feynman diagrams arise from expectation values, rather than an extra dynamical assumption.

The normalized vacuum generating functional removes components with no external insertions. In the operator formalism, for an interacting-vacuum expectation value of an inserted product $\mathcal{O}$, the same cancellation appears asVacuum projection and the Feynman i-epsilon prescription are implicit. The linked-cluster theorem exponentiates all connected vacuum bubbles into the same factor in numerator and denominator, so it cancels. Normalize by $Z[0]$ to remove every vacuum component. This cancellation of vacuum bubbles still leaves products of disconnected diagrams that each contain external insertions. If only connected correlators are wanted, differentiate the connected generating functional $W=-i\log [Z[J,\bar{\eta },\eta ]/Z[0]]$.

The resulting momentum-space QED Feynman rules for the bare theory can be stated in Feynman gauge as follows:

The illustrated interaction vertex has incoming fermion momentum $p$, incoming photon momentum $k$, and outgoing fermion momentum $p^{\prime }=p+k$. Its solid-line arrows indicate fermion flow. The photon wavy line has no fermion-flow arrow. The propagators, the vertex $-ie{\gamma }^a$, momentum conservation, and the fermionic signs determine the perturbative amplitudes.

The three real components form the Adjoint representation of $SU(2)$. Around a nonzero vacuum, a local gauge transformation rotates the direction of $\varphi (x)$ to the third axis. In this unitary gauge, the two angular fields are removed from the scalar parametrization and become longitudinal polarizations of two gauge bosons, through the Higgs mechanism. Thus $\varphi =(0,0,v+\eta {)}^T$ describes the perturbative physical fluctuations, with $v^2=-m^2/\lambda$.

The subgroup generated by $t^3$ fixes $v{e}_3$, giving $SU(2)\to U(1)$. Define the physical vector fieldsThe gauge covariant derivative on the radial configuration isso the scalar kinetic term becomes $\frac{1}{2}(\partial \eta {)}^2+g^2(v+\eta {)}^2{W}_{\mu }^{+}{W}^{-\mu }$.

Here is an exact form of the Lagrangian in these physical fields, up to its additive vacuum constant. DefineandThe minus sign in the printed non-Abelian gauge field strength gives precisely these signs. ThenIts quadratic terms give $m_A=0$, $m_{W^{+}}=m_{W^{-}}=gv$, and $m_{\eta }=\sqrt{2\lambda }v$. The two massive vectors have six real polarization degrees of freedom in total; the massless vector has two and the scalar one. Their total of nine equals the original six vector plus three scalar degrees of freedom.

Under the surviving $U(1)$, $W^{+}$ and $W^{-}$ have opposite charges and $\eta$ is neutral. The Yang-Mills theory supplies $A{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$ and $AA{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$ couplings and quartic charged-vector self-interactions. The scalar term supplies $2g^{2}v\eta W^{+}{W}^{-}$ and $g^2{\eta }^2{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$, together with the cubic and quartic scalar self-interactions. There is no direct $\eta AA$ term.

With suitable fermions, this spectrum offers a massless photon and massive charged mediators of short-range weak charged currents, so it captures part of the weak/electromagnetic pattern. It differs crucially from the electroweak interaction of the Standard Model: the latter gauges $SU(2{)}_L\times U(1{)}_Y$, uses a complex Higgs doublet, and breaks to $U(1{)}_{\mathrm{em}}$. Three rather than two generators are broken, leaving a massive neutral Z boson as well as $W^{\pm }$ and a photon. Its charge operator $Q=T^3+Y$ and independent hypercharge coupling give a nontrivial weak mixing angle. The present theory has no massive neutral mediator, no such mixing angle, and does not reproduce the observed chiral fermion charge assignments or their usual Yukawa couplings from the standard doublet/singlet assignments.

Both the left-handed Electron and the electron neutrino participate in weak charged currents through $W^{\pm }$, and both have weak neutral currents mediated by the Z boson. Their electromagnetic interactions differ: the Electron has electric charge $-e$ and couples to the photon, while the neutrino is electrically neutral and has no tree-level electromagnetic coupling.

In the minimal massless-neutrino Standard Model, the active neutrino has only a left-handed particle state and a right-handed antiparticle state. The Electron has both chiralities: its right-handed component has electromagnetic interactions and a weak neutral current, but no weak charged current. Its nonzero mass comes from a Yukawa coupling to the Higgs field; the minimal massless-neutrino model contains no right-handed neutrino for an analogous Dirac mass term.

Observed neutrino oscillations establish nonzero neutrino mass-squared differences. Atmospheric muon-neutrino disappearance depends on travel distance and energy, and solar electron neutrinos convert into other active flavors; reactor and accelerator oscillations provide complementary evidence. In propagation, the relative phase of two mass eigenstates is $\Delta m_{ij}^{2}L/(2E)$. If all masses were zero there would be no such relative phase. Thus at least two neutrino mass eigenstates are nonzero in the three-neutrino description with two independent measured splittings. A flavor state is a superposition of mass eigenstates, so the evidence does not assign a single definite mass to a flavor label.

Throughout this question dots denote conformal time derivatives, and $\mathcal{H}=\dot{a}/a$ is the conformal Hubble parameter. The monopole of the photon Boltzmann hierarchy gives ${\dot{\Theta }}_0+k{\Theta }_1/3=\dot{\varphi }$. With the specified velocity convention, the photon continuity equation is thereforeThe dipole equation is ${\dot{\Theta }}_1+k(2{\Theta }_2/5-{\Theta }_0)=\dot{\tau }({\Theta }_1+v_b)+k\psi$. Thus the photon Euler equation isIn particular, $\dot{\tau }<0$ makes the scattering term damp the photon-baryon velocity slip; it does not amplify it.

The linear momentum density of the photon-baryon fluid is weighted by enthalpy, not merely energy density:Elastic Thomson scattering exchanges momentum internally. Its photon force density is $(4{\bar{\rho }}_{\gamma }/3)\dot{\tau }(v_{\gamma }-v_b)$, so the baryon force density is its negative. Dividing by ${\bar{\rho }}_b$ gives the baryon Euler equation with Thomson dragThis $R$ is the baryon loading parameter, the baryon-to-photon inertia ratio. The two collision terms cancel exactly when the equations are weighted by their enthalpies. Background conservation gives ${\bar{\rho }}_b\propto a^{-3}$ and ${\bar{\rho }}_{\gamma }\propto a^{-4}$, so $\dot{R}=\mathcal{H}R$.

Let $q^i=e^i-\frac{1}{2}{h}^i{}_j{e}^j$, so $p^0=ϵ/a^2$ and $p^i=(ϵ/a^2)q^i$. The orthonormal tetrad gives ${\delta }_{ij}{e}^i{e}^j=1$. To first order,Hence the time-index Christoffel symbols contract toThe $\mathcal{H}{h}_{ij}$ term cancels the perturbation in the coordinate direction norm. This cancellation is why the local tetrad direction must not be mistaken for the coordinate direction.

Along the photon null geodesic, $d/d\lambda =p^{0}d/d\eta$, andThe time component of the geodesic equation now gives the photon energy redshift from a tensor metric perturbation:The derivative on the left follows the ray; the dot on $h$ is a partial conformal time derivative. The background redshift has already been removed by using comoving energy. The calculation only needs ${\Gamma }^0{}_{00}$ and ${\Gamma }^0{}_{ij}$; the unrelated printed ${\Gamma }^i{}_{j0}$ should contain $\frac{1}{2}{\dot{h}}^i{}_j$, rather than the full derivative.

For a slowly evolving spherical star, use a Lagrangian enclosed mass coordinate $m$. Let $u$ be specific thermal internal energy and $D/Dt$ follow a mass element. The stellar energy balance equation isThe outward luminosity is energy transported through the mass shell, ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{nuc}}$ is nuclear rest-mass energy released per unit mass and time, and ${ϵ}_{\nu }$ is escaping neutrino power per unit mass. Define the gravothermal stellar energy generation by ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{grav}}=-Du/Dt-PD(1/\rho )/Dt$. At fixed composition it is $-TDS/Dt$ by the first law of thermodynamics. During composition changes the full internal-energy derivative must use the appropriate equation of state, with nuclear rest-mass changes counted only once. If a tabulated nuclear rate already subtracts reaction-neutrino energy, that loss must not be subtracted a second time in ${ϵ}_{\nu }$.

In a nearly steady main sequence star, stellar nuclear fusion supplies most of the luminosity. Before stable hydrogen ignition, Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction releases gravitational energy. In a gas-supported hydrostatic star the stellar virial theorem gives $U\simeq -\Omega /2$, so about half the change in gravitational binding energy heats the star and half is available for radiation. The associated timescale is $G{M}^2/(RL)$. After nuclear burning ends, a white dwarf can shine by losing stored thermal energy; crystallization releases latent heat, and composition separation can add gravitational energy. These are heat and gravitational reservoirs rather than sustained hydrogen fusion.

Stellar nuclear fusion is possible because lighter nuclei can combine into products with larger nuclear binding energy. The energy per reaction is $Q=(m_{\mathrm{initial}}-m_{\mathrm{final}})c^2$, including the relevant particles consistently. Although thermal energies are below the Coulomb barrier, quantum tunnelling permits fusion. The thermonuclear reaction rate averages a cross-section over the thermal relative-speed distribution:For nonresonant charged-particle reactions the energy weighting contains $\exp [-E/(kT)-\sqrt{E_G/E}]$; the compromise between the thermal tail and penetration produces the Gamow peak. A resonance can greatly enhance the rate. Density, abundances and temperature therefore all affect the stellar energy-generation rate, and power laws such as $T^4$ or $T^{16}$ are local approximations.

For the proton–proton chain, first produce deuterium and helium-3:The initial reaction is slow because it converts a proton to a neutron through the weak interaction. It is the bottleneck that allows long hydrogen-burning lifetimes. The alternative pep reaction $p+e^{-}+p\to {}^2\mathrm{H}+{\nu }_e$ also feeds the same chain. There are three principal proton-proton chain branches. In pp I, two helium-3 nuclei terminate the chain:In pp II, helium-3 first captures an existing helium-4 nucleus, then electron capture and proton capture finish the branch:In pp III, the beryllium-7 instead captures a proton:Relative branch weights change with temperature and composition. All branches convert four protons into a net helium-4 nucleus, with two weak conversions and two neutrinos, allowing for the electron consumed in pp II. After including positron annihilation, the atomic-mass energy budget is approximately $26.7\mathrm{MeV}$ per net helium-4 nucleus, but the deposited heat is smaller by the branch-dependent escaping-neutrino energy. Near ordinary low-mass main-sequence conditions, ${ϵ}_{pp}\propto \rho X_H^2{T}^4$ is a useful local approximation.

The CNO cycle provides an alternative catalyzed hydrogen burning route in hotter cores. The CNO-I cycle, also called the CN cycle, consists ofThe carbon seed is regenerated: the net reaction again consumes four protons and produces one helium-4 nucleus, two positrons and two neutrinos. The slow ${}^{14}\mathrm{N}(p,\gamma ){}^{15}\mathrm{O}$ reaction governs the ordinary cycle and causes nitrogen-14 to accumulate. The CNO-II cycle branches through ${}^{15}\mathrm{N}(p,\gamma ){}^{16}\mathrm{O}$, ${}^{16}\mathrm{O}(p,\gamma ){}^{17}\mathrm{F}$, ${}^{17}\mathrm{F}\to {}^{17}\mathrm{O}+e^{+}+{\nu }_e$, and ${}^{17}\mathrm{O}(p,\alpha ){}^{14}\mathrm{N}$, after which the main cycle continues. Thus CNO nuclei are catalytic in the closed cycles, although their relative abundances change. A local rate is ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{CNO}}\propto \rho X_H{X}_{\mathrm{CNO}}{T}^{\eta }$ with a much steeper exponent than the PP chain; the preceding homology problem specifies $\eta =16$. The concentration of this heating near the centre favors a convective core in hotter, more massive hydrogen-burning stars.

Once hydrogen is exhausted in a core, contraction can raise its temperature enough for core helium burning. The Triple-alpha process overcomes the absence of stable mass-5 and mass-8 nuclei by maintaining a tiny transient beryllium-8 population:The Hoyle state, an excited carbon-12 resonance near the three-alpha threshold, makes the second capture efficient enough despite beryllium-8's very short lifetime. The net conversion is $3{}^4\mathrm{He}\to {}^{12}\mathrm{C}$, releasing about $7.27\mathrm{MeV}$. Because three alpha particles are required, the specific rate scales as ${\rho }^2{Y}^3$; a schematic resonant rate isIts local temperature exponent is $-3+44/T_8$, of order forty near $T_8=1$. A degenerate core cannot expand promptly to regulate this increase, giving a helium flash; in a nondegenerate core the stellar thermostat permits stable helium burning. The competing ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}(\alpha ,\gamma ){}^{16}\mathrm{O}$ reaction determines much of the eventual carbon-oxygen mixture.

If the core becomes hot enough, carbon burning follows, for example through ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}+{}^{12}\mathrm{C}\to {}^{20}\mathrm{Ne}+\alpha$ and ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}+{}^{12}\mathrm{C}\to {}^{23}\mathrm{Na}+p$. Neon burning begins with photodisintegration, ${}^{20}\mathrm{Ne}+\gamma \to {}^{16}\mathrm{O}+\alpha$, followed by alpha capture such as ${}^{20}\mathrm{Ne}+\alpha \to {}^{24}\mathrm{Mg}+\gamma$. The first step consumes heat, but the combined rearrangement can release net energy. Oxygen burning includes ${}^{16}\mathrm{O}+{}^{16}\mathrm{O}\to {}^{28}\mathrm{Si}+\alpha$ and channels producing phosphorus and other nearby nuclei. At still higher temperatures, silicon burning proceeds through photodisintegration and particle captures in a reaction network approaching quasi-statistical equilibrium, producing iron-group nuclei. It is not simply direct silicon-plus-silicon fusion; the products depend on the electron fraction and weak-interaction timescale.

The increasing nuclear binding energy per nucleon supplies progressively less energy as products approach the iron group. Further fusion past that region cannot provide sustained net heat to support a core. Massive stars can therefore end with an unstable iron-group core; lower-mass stars do not attain all these burning stages and instead leave remnants such as carbon-oxygen white dwarfs. Heavy-element neutron captures can synthesize nuclei beyond the iron group without being the principal hydrostatic power source.

Finally, stellar neutrino energy loss competes with every heat source. Reaction neutrinos accompany the proton–proton and CNO chains. Hot or dense material also emits neutrino pairs through $e^{-}+e^{+}\to \nu +\bar{\nu }$, plasmon decay, $e^{-}+\gamma \to e^{-}+\nu +\bar{\nu }$, and electron-ion bremsstrahlung. These neutrinos usually escape, unlike the photons whose transport is diffusive; neutrino trapping requires much more extreme collapse conditions. Late burning has smaller fuel-energy reservoirs and strong neutrino cooling, so its duration is much shorter than core hydrogen burning. The surface luminosity is the escaping photon power, $L=4\pi R^2\sigma T_{\mathrm{eff}}^4$, not the sum of photons and unobserved neutrino power. Radiative diffusion in a star, convection and electron conduction redistribute energy, while the energy-balance equation distinguishes true sources, losses and storage. Accretion or mass loss adds boundary energy and mechanical work when present, rather than changing the nuclear reaction budget.