Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 127 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Choose a contractible free -space , with the classifying space of a discrete group. The Borel construction gives the fibrationBecause the action on the sphere is free, the map has contractible fibre and is a homotopy equivalence. The quotient is a closed -dimensional manifold, so for .
The hypothesis on integral sphere cohomology makes the -action on trivial as well. Thus the Serre spectral sequence has just two rows, both copies of , in fibre degrees zero and . If is the fibre generator, the only possible differential is , and its transgression definesThe multiplicative differential rule gives . Up to the graded sign, this is multiplication by . For , the terms and must both vanish because their total degrees exceed . The first vanishing says the relevant multiplication map has zero kernel; the second says it has zero cokernel. ThereforeThis is periodic group cohomology from a free sphere action. Degree zero was excluded for a reason: can contribute to the quotient's top cohomology.
For , use its periodic free resolution with alternating maps and . Applying makes every differential zero, so is one-dimensional in every nonnegative degree. The two-step shift of the resolution supplies a nonzero degree-two class whose cup product gives the periodicity isomorphisms. For odd , let be a nonzero degree-one class. Graded commutativity gives , and the shift gives nonzero and in every degree. For , the two resolution maps agree over , giving a one-step shift whose degree-one class has nonzero powers. Hence the cohomology ring of a finite cyclic group over its prime field isHere the exterior factor is an exterior algebra and the polynomial factor is a polynomial ring. For odd , may be chosen as the Bockstein homomorphism of .
If contained , restriction would give that subgroup the same free, cohomologically trivial sphere action. It would therefore also have period in positive-degree cohomology. But , and the Künneth theorem givesThese dimensions strictly increase, so the groups in degrees and cannot be isomorphic. Thus contains no subgroup isomorphic to for any prime .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 128 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
A right Noetherian ring satisfies the ascending chain condition on right ideals; equivalently, every right ideal is a finitely generated module.
Here is a noncommutative Hilbert basis theorem proof adapted to the stated hypothesis. Set andThe equality follows inductively from , by moving one coefficient past one at a time. These spaces form an exhaustive filtered algebra structure on , with . This does not assert uniqueness of the displayed expressions or the existence of a coefficient-moving automorphism.
For a right ideal , defineEach is a right ideal of . In fact, if and , write with , ; then . Also by right multiplication by . Since is a right Noetherian ring, this ascending chain stabilizes at some .
Choose finite generators for each , , and choose with . These finitely many elements generate as a right ideal. To see this, induct on for . Write with ; then . Put and express . Write with . The differencelies in , so the induction applies. At the remainder is zero. Hence is right Noetherian.
For the quantum torus, take and the convention . Begin with the polynomial ring , which is Noetherian by the Hilbert basis theorem. Adjoining preserves the hypothesis because it commutes with , and gives . Adjoin next. The relation and its inverse coefficient-moving relation give for . Finally adjoin to , where . On a monomial, ; when this is in , and when it is in . The reverse inclusion follows by the same relation. The preceding argument applies at each step, proving the quantum torus is right Noetherian. Nonzero is required for this notation.
For a noncommutative ring, a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring means a proper two-sided ideal such that for two-sided ideals implies or . Equivalently, implies or . This definition does not require to be a noncommutative domain.
Retain the right Noetherian ring hypothesis for the last assertion. More generally, the ascending chain condition on two-sided ideals suffices. We claim that every proper two-sided ideal contains a product of finitely many prime ideals of a noncommutative ring, each containing . If not, choose a maximal counterexample . It cannot be a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. Thus there are two-sided ideals strictly containing with : add to the two witnesses for failure of the defining condition for a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. By maximality, both and contain products of finitely many prime ideals of a noncommutative ring containing them. Concatenating these products gives a product inside , a contradiction.
Apply the claim to in a nonzero , obtaining . Every prime ideal of a noncommutative ring contains one of the , by repeated application of the definition of a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. For the prime radical of a noncommutative ring , it follows thatIndeed, gives , and for every gives equality of the intersections. If , the empty intersection is the whole zero ring and the conclusion is immediate.
The final assertion is false for arbitrary algebras without the preceding chain condition. For example, in the commutative ring the nilradical is , its only prime ideal, but the product of any number of distinct is nonzero. Thus this nilradical is not a nilpotent ideal.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 128 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Choose a finite-dimensional generating vector subspace containing , and write for the linear span of products of elements of . The Gelfand–Kirillov dimension isFor a nonzero finitely generated module considered as a right module, choose a finite-dimensional generating vector subspace and define the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a module byFor left modules, replace by . These values are independent of the choices: two algebra-generating vector subspaces satisfy and for some positive integers , and two module-generating vector subspaces are contained in bounded-degree translates of one another. The corresponding growth bounds differ only by a constant rescaling and shift of , which do not change the limit superior.
Let be a nonzero standard graded algebra, generated by elements of degree one. It is a homogeneous quotient ring of the polynomial ring . By the Hilbert-Serre theorem, its Hilbert series is a rational function whose only possible pole is at . After canceling, write it as with , where . The cumulative dimensions are the coefficients of and are eventually a polynomial in of degree , with positive leading coefficient. With , these cumulative dimensions equal . ConsequentlyFor the algebra is finite-dimensional and nonzero, so the cumulative dimension is eventually a positive constant. If the zero algebra is allowed, the common convention is an exception to the printed assertion; the integer conclusion concerns nonzero unital algebras.
For the Weyl algebra , the total-degree filtered algebra structure has associated graded ring . Its ordered monomials form a basis. Every finitely generated module has a good filtration of a module, and its associated graded module is finitely generated over . The Hilbert-Serre theorem therefore shows that its Gelfand–Kirillov dimension is an integer in .
A nonzero module of Gelfand–Kirillov dimension zero here would have eventually constant cumulative dimension, hence be finite-dimensional. This is impossible in characteristic zero: taking the trace of the endomorphisms representing gives . For right modules the right-action operators reverse composition and give the negative identity instead, with the same contradiction. ThusBoth occur. The regular module has , hence Gelfand–Kirillov dimension two. For a right module of Gelfand–Kirillov dimension one, take with and . These actions satisfy the defining relation because . The module is a cyclic module generated by , and . This also gives the lower bound for this particular Weyl algebra without invoking a general inequality for higher Weyl algebras.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 128 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
A derivation of an algebra is a -linear map satisfying . The commutator is again a derivation: expanding cancels the two mixed terms and leaves . The commutator on endomorphisms is bilinear, antisymmetric, and satisfies the Jacobi identity by cancellation of its twelve triple-composition terms. Therefore is a Lie algebra.
In degree zero of the Hochschild cochain complex, , so for commutative . In degree one, is precisely the derivation rule; the boundaries are inner derivations, which vanish for commutative . HenceFor cochains , , the Hochschild cup product isDefine the insertion operation byA degree-zero cochain is an element of , inserted with no arguments; for the sum is empty. For the Gerstenhaber bracket we use the left graded Leibniz rule convention, compatible with the unsigned Hochschild cup product just displayed:Both degree-zero inputs have bracket zero. Another common insertion convention writes ; the two brackets differ by . With an unsigned Hochschild cup product, that convention uses the corresponding right graded Leibniz rule. The distinction matters for a degree-two cochain bracketed with a function. Either consistent convention gives the same degree-one Lie bracket and the same derivation action on functions.
If , this convention gives . The shifted Jacobi identity and therefore show that the Gerstenhaber bracket respects Hochschild cocycles and the images of the coboundary map. The Hochschild cup product and Gerstenhaber bracket induce operations on Hochschild cohomology. A Gerstenhaber algebra is a graded algebra with an associative degree-zero product with the graded commutative algebra rule , and a degree-minus-one graded Lie bracket making the shifted degrees into a graded Lie algebra. In particular,for homogeneous elements of a graded algebra of degrees . The shifted Jacobi identity isThe Hochschild cup product does not make the cochains a graded commutative algebra in general, but does make their cohomology a graded commutative algebra; the insertion operation supplies the homotopy for this assertion and for the graded Leibniz rule. Thus these axioms describe the induced Gerstenhaber algebra, not a claim of a graded commutative algebra structure on the cochain multiplication itself.
For , the enveloping algebra is , andis a projective resolution. The first map is injective since is an integral domain, and its cokernel is . Applying gives a zero coboundary map. ConsequentlyThe Hochschild cup product is ordinary multiplication of functions and scalar multiplication of derivations, with the product of two derivations zero because . Every derivation is , since it is determined by its value on . The Gerstenhaber bracket iswith all other orders fixed by graded antisymmetry. These formulas fully determine the Gerstenhaber algebra.
For , the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg theorem identifiesThus the degrees zero, one, and two are , , and , and all higher groups vanish. The Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg map sends a wedge of derivations to the cochainThe factorial is invertible in characteristic zero. Equivalently, the groups follow from the Koszul resolution on the regular sequence in , whose dual coboundary maps vanish on .
The Hochschild cup product becomes the exterior product, and our Gerstenhaber bracket becomes the left Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket. It is determined by the commutator of derivations, , zero brackets of functions, and the displayed graded antisymmetry and left graded Leibniz rule. For explicit signs, put and . ThenThe last bracket has degree three, whose exterior power is zero. For two derivations, the coefficient functions of their commutator give the remaining formula. This specifies the entire Gerstenhaber algebra; under the alternate insertion convention mentioned above, the first displayed bracket changes sign, together with the Leibniz convention. No smoothness of a general finitely generated commutative algebra was assumed: the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg theorem is invoked here only for the smooth polynomial ring .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 11G b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Eisenstein criterion states that ifhas a prime number such that , for every , and , then is irreducible over .
After dividing out the polynomial content, suppose for contradiction that the resulting primitive polynomial factors as with positive-degree , using Gauss lemma for polynomials. Reduction modulo gives , so in the polynomial ring both and are monomials. Because both factors have positive degree, their constant coefficients are divisible by . Their product is then divisible by , a contradiction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 101 1 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Here the coefficient fields are and . A polynomial ring in one variable over a field is a Euclidean domain, hence a principal ideal domain; its nonzero prime ideals are generated by irreducible polynomials. The fundamental theorem of algebra says that all irreducible polynomials over are linear. Combining it with complex conjugation shows that the monic irreducible polynomials over are exactly the linear polynomials and quadratics with no real root. ThusEvery nonzero prime ideal in this list is a maximal ideal; is a prime ideal because is an integral domain. Likewise,The map is contraction of an ideal along the inclusion. It sends to . For , the contraction of consists of the real polynomials vanishing at . If , the factor theorem gives the ideal . If , a real polynomial vanishing at also vanishes at its complex conjugate , so it is divisible by . Division by this real quadratic gives the converse and henceThus each real linear prime ideal has one preimage, each real quadratic prime ideal has the two conjugate preimages and , and has only above it. In particular, is surjective.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 101 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
False. In the polynomial ring over a field, takeThe ideal is a maximal ideal, with quotient ring . AlsoIn this last ring, an element with nonzero constant term is a unit, and an element with zero constant term is a multiple of and has square zero. Thus every zero divisor is a nilpotent element. This is equivalent to being a primary ideal: a zero product in the quotient ring with one nonzero factor forces the other factor to be nilpotent. Its radical of an ideal is , so is -primary.
However, , so . Moreover while , since every polynomial in has no term of total degree one. For every , , so . Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ib Paper 2 11G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Because is irreducible, the ideal is maximal in the polynomial ring . Henceis a field extension of . Let . Evaluation in the quotient gives , and the factor theorem in givesfor some . This is the standard adjoining a root of an irreducible polynomial construction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ib Paper 1 9G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain applies because every Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain. It says that a finitely generated -module is isomorphic towhere the nonzero nonunits are unique up to multiplication by units. They are the invariant factors.
For , multiplication by is the linear map . Since is finite-dimensional over , is a finitely generated torsion module over the polynomial ring , so it has no free summand. Choosing each invariant factor to be monic givesThe basis of each cyclic summand makes multiplication by a companion matrix. Concatenating these bases therefore puts in rational canonical form.
On , a polynomial annihilates multiplication by exactly when it is divisible by . It follows that the minimal polynomial and characteristic polynomial areThe second identity follows blockwise from the characteristic polynomial of a companion matrix. Since every divides , the product annihilates every cyclic summand. Thus , which is the Cayley-Hamilton theorem.
For the displayed matrix, the given generators of are the columns ofElementary row and column operations over give the Smith normal formConsequently the nonunit invariant factors areand, as a check,
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ib Paper 3 10G v Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
By the prime ideal quotient criterion,For a principal ideal, this is precisely the assertion that is a prime element. This closes the cycle and proves that (i)--(v) are equivalent.
Now let be a surjective ring homomorphism, where is a principal ideal domain and is an integral domain. WriteIf , the first isomorphism theorem for rings makes an isomorphism. Otherwiseis an integral domain, so the equivalences just proved show that is maximal and is a field.
Next suppose that the polynomial ring is a principal ideal domain. It follows first that is an integral domain. For nonzero , the idealis principal. Since divides the nonzero constant , it is constant; since it also divides , that constant divides the coefficient , so is a unit. Therefore , and there are polynomials such thatSetting gives , so every nonzero is a unit. Hence
Finally, let be an integral domain in which every two nonzero elements have a greatest common divisor. If an irreducible divides , then is either a unit or an associate of . In the second case . In the first case, the Euclid lemma in a greatest-common-divisor domain gives . Thus every irreducible element of is prime.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 113 2 d Solution 2026-09-28
The standard affine charts of are copies of , and the product charts of are copies of . Their local rings are localizations of polynomial rings over and hence are regular local rings. Both schemes are therefore regular.
On a regular integral scheme every Weil divisor is Cartier, so the divisor class group is naturally the Picard group. Pullback of line bundles along the Segre embedding therefore definesThe two groups areThe Segre coordinates are bihomogeneous of bidegree , so . In these bases the map is and
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 113 2 c Solution 2026-09-28
A Cartier divisor on an integral scheme is an open cover together with nonzero rational functions such that every ratio is a regular unit on .
Every prime Weil divisor on is cut out by an irreducible homogeneous polynomial because the polynomial ring is a unique factorization domain. Hence any Weil divisor can be represented by a homogeneous rational expressionof some total degree . On the standard chart , put . This is a degree-zero rational function, and on ,is a regular unit. These local equations form a Cartier divisor whose associated Weil divisor is the original one.
Now put and let be the hyperplane divisor at infinity. Its complement is . Iterating the given invariance under multiplication by givesThe localization sequence for the divisor class group shows that every class on is a pullback of a class on plus an integer multiple of . Restriction to the generic fiber kills pullbacks from and sends to the generator of . Therefore the sum is direct, provingThis is the divisor class group of a projective-space bundle with trivial vector bundle.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 102 1 iv Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Use the Polynomial representation of the Heisenberg Lie algebra on the infinite-dimensional polynomial ring :The product rule gives , so this is a Lie algebra representation. It is a Faithful Lie algebra representation: if is the zero operator, applying it first to gives , and then applying the remaining operator to gives .
To prove irreducibility, let be a nonzero invariant subspace and choose a nonzero polynomial in of least degree. If its degree were positive, repeated differentiation would produce a nonzero element of smaller degree, so contains a nonzero constant. Invariance under multiplication by then puts every monomial in , and hence .
Polynomial polyvector field 2026-10-05
For a polynomial ring , a degree- polynomial polyvector field is an element of . Its product is the exterior product. Together with the Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket these spaces form a Gerstenhaber algebra.
Polynomial-ring height and dimension formula 2026-10-07
For a prime ideal of a polynomial ring over a field, the quotient's Krull dimension is the transcendence degree of its fraction field, and its height is minus that degree. This dimension theorem identifies algebraic codimension with the length of prime chains. It must not be applied indiscriminately to every Noetherian ring without its polynomial-ring hypotheses.
Syzygy module 2026-10-06
Given a free resolution , its first syzygy module is , the module of relations among the chosen generators of . Higher syzygy modules are successive kernels. They depend on the choice of resolution; a minimal graded free resolution gives canonical ranks and degrees of generators over a standard graded ring structure on a polynomial ring.
Unique factorization in an integral domain Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
Every nonzero nonunit in a unique factorization domain is a finite product of irreducible elements. Such a factorization is unique up to permutation and multiplication of the factors by units. Irreducibles are prime elements, so divisibility can be checked by comparing their multiplicities. This applies to a polynomial ring over a field and is useful for intersections of localizations inside its fraction field.
Unmixedness of a complete intersection 2026-10-06
A projective complete intersection defined by a regular sequence in a polynomial ring has pure codimension equal to the sequence length and has no embedded associated primes. Thus its components account for the whole degree, with their generic multiplicities. This fact excludes hidden embedded points when a contained curve already has the full intersection degree.