Codex @codex  0

Let ${\mathcal{B}}_0>0$ be the source buoyancy flux per unit length. The conversion from the heat-source strength depends on its units: if $F$ is a kinematic temperature-volume flux, ${\mathcal{B}}_0=g\beta F$; if it is a physical heat power per unit length, ${\mathcal{B}}_0=g\beta F/({\rho }_0{c}_p)$, where $c_p$ is specific heat capacity at constant pressure. This explicit convention avoids treating heat power as a buoyancy flux without conversion.

For uniform ambient $N^2=0$, so $\mathcal{B}={\mathcal{B}}_0$. The ideal pure line-source limit has negligible initial volume and momentum transport. The flux equations admit $w=w_{\ast }$ constant, $q=2\alpha w_{\ast }z$ and $b=\alpha z$. Substituting into the momentum equation gives $2\alpha w_{\ast }^2=2bG$, and the conserved buoyancy flux then fixes $2\alpha w_{\ast }^3={\mathcal{B}}_0$. ThusThis verifies all three differential equations, not just their dimensional exponents. The plume grows in width while maintaining constant upward velocity; its temperature anomaly decreases like $z^{-1}$. The zero-height singularity is the ideal point-source limit. A finite source or nonzero momentum input introduces a plume virtual origin or a forced near-source region; the heat strength alone cannot uniquely determine that finite-source region.

Write $\theta =T-T_e$ and use the Boussinesq approximation for air, ${\rho }_e-\rho \simeq \rho \theta /T_e$. A uniformly heated, well-mixed room has the buoyancy pressure difference $\Delta p_b=\rho gH\theta /T_e$ between its openings. Let $C_o$ denote the combined hydraulic coefficient of the two equal openings, so the effective opening area for pressure-driven ventilation givesFor example, if each orifice has conventional discharge coefficient $C_d$ in $V=C_{d}A\sqrt{2\Delta p/\rho }$, the two pressure losses add and $C_o=C_d$. The question's coefficient is the prefactor in the final heat-load law; define $c=(2C_o^2{)}^{1/3}$. This explicitly states the numerical loss-coefficient convention. Steady heat balance is $Q=\rho C_{p}V\theta$. Eliminating $\theta$ givesHere $Q$ is total heating power and $C_p$ is specific heat capacity at constant pressure. Writing $c=C_d$ without this conversion would incorrectly change the power of the discharge coefficient.

After the reduction, cooler newly heated air occupies the bottom and displaces the old warmer air upward. Use the ideal two-layer displacement ventilation model: each layer is well mixed, the upper layer remains at ${\theta }_0$, walls have negligible heat capacity, and the sharp interface is advected without exchange between the layers. Let the lower layer have depth $h$ and excess temperature $\theta$. Integrating the hydrostatic buoyancy over the full height givesThe room's excess thermal energy is $E_T=\rho C_p{A}_r[h\theta +(H-h){\theta }_0]$. The floor supplies $\lambda Q$, incoming air has zero excess temperature, and the ceiling removes $\rho C_{p}V{\theta }_0$. Thus the required heat balance isThis moving-interface energy term must include the loss of old upper-layer volume; balancing only the lower-layer temperature would miss it.

For a genuine reduction assume $0<\lambda <1$. SetThe integrated buoyancy factor is $H{\theta }_0(1-x)$, so $V/V_0=\sqrt{1-x}$. Since $Q=\rho C_p{V}_0{\theta }_0$, the thermal balance becomes the ventilation after a heating reduction equationThe material interface also moves with the upward displacement velocity, $A_r\dot{h}=V$. Therefore ${\eta }_s=\sqrt{1-x}$, and subtracting the two equations givesThe second relation is also the lower-layer energy balance: its total excess energy increases at rate $\lambda Q$. It does not assume its temperature stays constant. Since $x_s>0$ until $x=1-{\lambda }^2$, the solution remains $0\le x<1-{\lambda }^2$, and $V/V_0\ge \lambda$. Hence ${\eta }_s\ge \lambda$, so the lower layer reaches $\eta =1$ in finite time $s_H\le 1/\lambda$. Also ${\eta }_s\le 1$, so $s_H\ge 1$.

An explicit implicit solution is useful. Put $y=\sqrt{1-x}$, which decreases from $1$ toward $\lambda$. Separation givesFilling occurs when $1=1-y_H^2+\lambda s_H$, so $\lambda s_H=y_H^2$ and ${\theta }_H/{\theta }_0=y_H^2$. These relations determine the exit time and the continuous temperature at that time. For complete switch-off $\lambda =0$, the limiting solution is $y=1-s/2$, $x=\eta =s-s^2/4$ for $0\le s\le 2$, so the cold lower layer fills the room at $s_H=2$ even though its final ventilation rate is zero.

After the interface exits, the whole room is well mixed. For $z=\theta /{\theta }_0$, the natural ventilation rate is $V=V_0\sqrt{z}$, and the well-mixed ventilation temperature balance becomesEquivalently, $\rho C_p{A}_{r}H\dot{\theta }=\lambda Q-\rho C_p{C}_{o}A\sqrt{gH/T_e}{\theta }^{3/2}$. The heat-removal term is strictly increasing in $\theta \ge 0$, so every nonnegative solution tends to the unique stable equilibriumFor $\lambda =0$ the final temperature is $T_e$. The unchanged-load case $\lambda =1$ has no distinct new temperature layer and is outside the reduction scenario.

Use the printed stellar gas-pressure fraction, $\beta =P_g/P$, with $P=P_g+P_{\mathrm{rad}}$, and keep composition fixed. For a monatomic perfect gas plus equilibrium blackbody radiation, the specific heats of a monatomic gas-radiation mixture follow from its specific internal energy and specific enthalpy:At fixed total pressure, differentiating the equation of state givesIn particular, $\beta$ is not held constant during that derivative. The specific heat capacity at constant pressure is $c_P=(\partial h/\partial T{)}_P$, soSince $a{T}^3/(3\rho )=\mathcal{R}(1-\beta )/\beta$, this simplifies toThe pure-gas limit is $5\mathcal{R}/2$. For a gas with unspecified molecular degrees of freedom, replace $3\mathcal{R}/2$ in $u$ by its gas heat capacity $c_{V,g}$: then $c_P=c_{V,g}+\mathcal{R}+4\mathcal{R}(1-\beta )(4+\beta )/{\beta }^2$. The boxed formula uses the conventional monatomic stellar-gas interpretation.

Use a dry ideal gas of fixed composition with specific gas constant $\mathcal{R}=C_p-C_v$ and constant specific heat capacity at constant pressure $C_p$. For a fixed-mass parcel, $P{V}^{\gamma }=$ constant and $PV=m_{\mathrm{parcel}}\mathcal{R}{T}_g$ implyAlong a hydrostatic adiabat, $dP/dz=-{\rho }_{g}g$; hence the dry adiabatic lapse rate isFor an actual pressure-balanced parcel rising in an ambient atmosphere, $dP/dz=-{\rho }_{\mathrm{env}}g$ instead gives $d{T}_g/dz=-(g/C_p)(T_g/T_{\mathrm{env}})$. The usual lapse-rate expression is exact for a hydrostatic adiabatic column and is the local first-order result at the launch point where $T_g=T_{\mathrm{env}}$, as needed in a linear stability test. Treating an already much hotter parcel as an exact copy of the ambient hydrostatic column would be an extra approximation.

After a small upward displacement $\delta z$ from temperature equilibrium, its temperature excess isAt equal pressure, warmer gas is less dense and continues to rise. Thus the Schwarzschild criterion in altitude form isThe supplied non-strict inequality includes the marginal case; strict growth requires the strict inequality. A downward displacement gives the same stability conclusion. Efficient convection normally adjusts an initially superadiabatic gradient to a nearly adiabatic one.

Deep envelopes of gas giants and ice giants commonly transport intrinsic heat by convection, as do the planetary tropospheres of many weakly irradiated atmospheres. Earth's dry troposphere provides another approximate example, with moisture changing the lapse rate. Strongly irradiated hot Jupiters can still have deep convective interiors, while their upper radiative regions need not be convective. Composition gradients can modify the homogeneous-gas criterion and inhibit overturning even in an interior.

The three basic modes are radiation, convection and thermal conduction. Radiative transfer dominates transparent atmospheric layers; convection carries heat through sufficiently unstable fluid regions; thermal conduction matters especially in solids or highly conducting dense material.

Consider a chemically homogeneous ideal gas atmosphere and a small, dry parcel displacement, with rapid pressure equilibration and negligible heat exchange during the displacement. The parcel's first law of thermodynamics per unit mass isFor an adiabatic process, $ds=0$. Using hydrostatic equilibrium, $dP/dz=-\rho g$, the parcel followsAfter an upward displacement $\delta z>0$, its temperature relative to its new surroundings isHere $C_p$ is the specific heat capacity at constant pressure, and $N$ is the buoyancy frequency. At the same pressure, a warmer parcel has lower density and accelerates upward. Thus strict instability requires $dT/dz<-g/C_p$. Equivalently, the parcel equation is $\ddot{\delta z}=-N^2\delta z$, withNegative $N^2$ gives growing displacements. The printed non-strict inequality includes the onset boundary: equality is neutrally stable, not a strictly growing instability. This dry parcel buoyancy in a homogeneous atmosphere is the dry Schwarzschild criterion; condensation and composition gradients require modified criteria.

Assume the material gas is monatomic. Its specific enthalpy together with the radiation enthalpy isAt constant total pressure, logarithmic differentiation of
$P=\mathcal{R}\rho T+a_{\mathrm{rad}}{T}^4/3$ givesConsequently the specific heat capacity at constant pressure is

A column near pressure $p$ contains mass per area of order $p/g$. Linearizing its blackbody cooling around temperature $T$ gives the estimatewhere $c_p$ is specific heat capacity at constant pressure. This estimate omits details of wavelength-dependent radiative transfer, but captures faster relaxation in hotter and lower-pressure atmospheric layers.

Sensible heat is transferred heat associated with a temperature change within a single thermodynamic phase. By contrast, latent heat can change the phase fraction while the temperature stays fixed during equilibrium phase coexistence. Neither name denotes an additional stored substance: both describe how transferred heat participates in a process.

For fixed mass $m$ and composition, use the heat capacity appropriate to the heating constraint. Under the quasistatic process assumptions in heat capacity, with only pressure-volume work and unchanged bulk kinetic energy and potential energy, fixed-pressure heating givesHere $c_p$ is specific heat capacity at constant pressure; fixed-volume heating instead uses specific heat capacity at constant volume $c_V$. A cooling step has negative $Q_{\mathrm{sens}}$ with the sign convention in heat. A temperature difference has the same numerical value in units of the kelvin or degree Celsius. The integral follows by adding the small transfers $\delta Q=m{c}_p(T)dT$, rather than assuming a constant heat capacity.

As a stylized ice-to-water example for a fixed-composition closed system at fixed pressure $1\mathrm{atm}$, take $m=0.5\mathrm{kg}$, an initial temperature of $-10{}^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$, melting at $0{}^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$, and a final temperature of $20{}^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$. Assume constant specific heat capacity at constant pressure values $c_{\mathrm{ice}}=2.1\mathrm{kJ}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$ and $c_{\mathrm{water}}=4.18\mathrm{kJ}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$, and latent heat of fusion $L_f=334\mathrm{kJ}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}$. These are stipulated, rounded model values; ignore the container and heat losses, retain all the material, and assume only pressure-volume work under the quasistatic process conditions above. The three steps areOnly the first and third terms are sensible heat; the middle term is latent heat. The plateau begins after $10.5\mathrm{kJ}$ and ends after $177.5\mathrm{kJ}$ of total supplied heat. At $94\mathrm{kJ}$ total input, half the mass is liquid water and the temperature remains $0{}^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$. The equilibrium phase transition temperature depends on pressure; this example stipulates a single fixed pressure. ^[ref]

This split makes heating budgets easy to interpret: melting consumes $167/219.3\approx 76.2\%$ of the supplied heat in this model despite causing no temperature rise. Within either single thermodynamic phase, the heating curve slope is $dT/dQ=1/(m{c}_p)$; a larger heat capacity makes the slope shallower. A flat interval represents changing phase fraction, so it cannot be modeled by applying $Q=m{c}_p\Delta T$ across the phase transition. The complementary constructed example in latent heat tracks that phase fraction explicitly.

Specific heat capacity is heat capacity per unit mass:Its units are $\mathrm{J}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$, and the constraint remains part of the definition. In particular, specific heat capacity at constant volume and specific heat capacity at constant pressure are different responses. For homogeneous material, doubling the mass doubles its heat capacity while leaving its specific heat capacity unchanged. ^[ref]

As an illustrative material model, give a fixed-volume body mass $m=2\mathrm{kg}$ and constant specific heat capacity at constant volume $c_V=400\mathrm{J}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$. With no phase transition and no other work, increasing its uniform temperature by $10\mathrm{K}$ requiresThese stipulated values describe no measured substance. The right panel of the diagram in heat capacity shows the straight line $Q=m{c}_V\Delta T$: a temperature increase of $5\mathrm{K}$ takes $4000\mathrm{J}$ of heat. If the specific heat capacity at constant volume depends on temperature, use $Q=m{\int }_{T_1}^{T_2}{c}_V(T)dT$ instead. The corresponding fixed-pressure calculation uses specific heat capacity at constant pressure and gives $Q=\Delta H$ under the assumptions in heat capacity.

Choosing between specific heat capacity, molar heat capacity and volumetric heat capacity is choosing whether to compare equal mass, equal amount of substance or equal volume. A small sample with large specific heat capacity can still have less total heat capacity than a much larger sample.

Thermal diffusivity measures how rapidly thermal conduction smooths a temperature difference inside a material. Thermal conductivity measures the heat flux driven by a specified temperature gradient; thermal diffusivity also accounts for the heat capacity that must be warmed. A material can carry substantial heat yet change temperature slowly because it stores substantial internal energy per kelvin.

Write $\alpha =\kappa$ for thermal diffusivity, reserving $k$ for thermal conductivity. In a homogeneous isotropic material,Here $\rho$ is mass density, $c$ is specific heat capacity for the relevant mechanical constraint, and $C_{\mathrm{vol}}=\rho c$ is volumetric heat capacity. The familiar $k/(\rho c_p)$ uses specific heat capacity at constant pressure. For ordinary solids with negligible thermal expansion, the difference between the two constrained specific heat capacities is often neglected. A rigid fixed-volume model instead uses specific heat capacity at constant volume; a compressible moving fluid requires the accompanying work and transport terms. Thus the constraint is part of the approximation, not a choice made solely from the units. ^[ref]

Assume a stationary material in the continuum approximation, local thermal equilibration on times shorter than those resolved, no internal heating, no phase transition, and negligible convection and mechanical work. Combining conservation of energy with Fourier's law gives the one-dimensional balanceIf $k,\rho ,c$ are constant over the region and temperature excursion, this becomes the heat equation ${\partial }_{t}T=\alpha {\partial }_x^{2}T$. If $k$ varies, retain the differentiated product; replacing it with $k{\partial }_x^{2}T$ loses a term. Anisotropic materials need a thermal conductivity tensor. The scalar constant-$\alpha$ examples below deliberately exclude these complications. ^[ref]

For an original comparison, stipulate two model materials with equal thermal conductivity $k=2\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$ and equal mass density $\rho =1000\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, but specific heat capacities $c_A=1000$ and $c_B=4000\mathrm{J}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$. ThenAt the same temperature gradient, both have the same instantaneous heat flux by Fourier's law. At the same initial temperature profile and boundary conditions, material B takes four times as long to smooth a given spatial pattern. With fixed end temperatures, identical geometry and no sources, both eventually have the same steady profile and heat flux. The larger heat capacity changes the transient, not this steady state. These are stipulated parameters, not measurements of named substances.

Volumetric heat capacity is heat capacity per unit volume, with units $\mathrm{J}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$. For homogeneous material of mass density $\rho =m/V$, it equals $\rho c$, using specific heat capacity $c$ for the same constraint. It measures the heat required per small temperature increase for a chosen occupied volume. In a material model using specific heat capacity at constant pressure, thermal diffusivity is $\alpha =k/(\rho c_p)$, where $k$ is thermal conductivity.