For a two-dimensional electron gas in a perpendicular magnetic field of magnitude , the filling factor is the Electron number per unit area divided by the orbital degeneracy per unit area of one spin branch of a Landau level. Here is the positive elementary charge and the Planck constant. The nominal filling factor varies continuously with ; it need not be an integer.
Quantum Hall effect 2026-10-18
The quantum Hall effect connects an electrical measurement to a quantum counting rule: a two-dimensional electron gas in a perpendicular magnetic field can exhibit plateaus of transverse electrical resistance. The integer case supplies a resistance scale built from the Planck constant and elementary charge, rather than the sample's dimensions. The fractional quantum Hall effect involves additional many-Electron physics.
Daniel Tsui, Horst Störmer and Arthur Gossard reported the effect in 1982. They grew gallium arsenide–aluminium gallium arsenide layers by molecular beam epitaxy, separating the two-dimensional electron gas from its semiconductor doping. They cut Hall bars and made indium contacts. Low-field measurements established number density and charge carrier mobility. A perpendicular magnetic field sweep measured transverse and longitudinal sheet resistivities at several temperatures. Cooling sharpened the plateau near and the longitudinal minimum at filling factor ; integer plateaus provided an internal comparison. The longitudinal minimum remained finite at the lowest temperature: zero-temperature vanishing was unresolved. This established anomalous transport, without directly measuring excitation electric charge.[ref]
Figure 1.
Separate transverse and longitudinal readouts of a fractional quantum Hall effect experiment
. Original functional Hall bar schematic, with chosen contact labels and no historical dimensions. The inset separates the two-dimensional electron gas from semiconductor doping; the two meters distinguish transverse electrical resistance from longitudinal dissipation. No trace or measured value is reconstructed. Details.
The two readouts test different statements. A single intersection with would also occur on the smooth classical relation at . A quantum Hall plateau instead persists over a magnetic field interval. Comparing transverse and longitudinal signals helps distinguish that plateau from a contact-placement artefact; the quantum Hall conductivity tensor inversion quantifies the contamination when longitudinal sheet resistivity is nonzero.
Later, 1997 shot noise measurements associated with quantum tunnelling at filling factor tested the excitation electric charge separately, finding . That is a different observable from a Hall plateau.[ref]
An electron gas confined in one spatial direction, with motion available in the other two. Its Electron number per unit area is . The ideal Fermi gas approximation neglects interactions between Electrons; an actual two-dimensional electron gas can have important interactions. Confinement alone does not require a magnetic field or Landau levels.
Klaus von Klitzing, G. Dorda and M. Pepper reported a silicon MOSFET measurement in 1980. Its gate controlled an semiconductor inversion layer; transverse contacts measured the Hall voltage and separate longitudinal contacts measured dissipation. One sweep held , and fixed while varying gate voltage. Hall plateaus accompanied small longitudinal voltages. Device-geometry comparisons and high-input-impedance voltage measurements helped test whether contact placement or electrical loading produced the result.[ref]
Figure 1.
Hall-bar contacts and gate-controlled channel
. Details.
This original functional diagram separates transverse and longitudinal readouts; it does not reproduce the historical device's dimensions. The gate inset explains how a field-effect transistor provides an adjustable two-dimensional electron gas. A longitudinal voltage close to zero is a useful check because accidental longitudinal separation between Hall contacts can otherwise contaminate the transverse measurement.