Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the thermal and statistical physics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 Section A A1 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
First solve the equation of state for the volume:The Gibbs free energy has differential . At fixed temperature and particle number, integrate between the two pressures:ConsequentlyUse , keeping both endpoint pressures fixed while differentiating the difference:Equivalently, the Maxwell relation gives , whose pressure integral is the same result. These are the Gibbs free-energy change for a pressure-linear gas correction identities. The physical path requires and positive volume throughout. The correction has units of volume per particle, so each term in is an energy and each term in has units of energy per kelvin.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 4 f Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
Take the two magnetic moments along to be , so and the two energies are . The quantum Gibbs state at inverse temperature isIts Bloch vector is . At , or in the high-temperature limit, it approaches ; at with nonzero , it approaches the lower-energy pure state. Here is the magnitude or signed coefficient multiplying in the magnetic Hamiltonian, rather than a moment with an additional unstated factor of two.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 4 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
The opposite -axis pure states have projectors . Averaging them givesTherefore C and B cannot be distinguished by any measurement on the atoms alone. Every POVM outcome has the same probability for the two preparations; this is the operational equivalence of different quantum state ensembles. Accessible preparation labels or additional correlations would be extra information. C can be distinguished from A by the -axis spin measurement in part (c).
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 4 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
The projective measurement probabilities are . Both density operators have zero -component of their Bloch vector, soTheir full outcome distributions, not merely their mean values, coincide. Along , however,Thus repeated spin measurement along distinguishes the preparations statistically. A single negative outcome excludes A, while a single positive outcome is compatible with either; under B the probability of independent positive outcomes is .
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 4 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
Taking the outer product for A and averaging the two orthogonal projections for B givesThe off-diagonal entries in retain quantum coherence between the -basis states. They are absent from B's classical quantum state ensemble. In particular, and : A is a pure state, B a mixed state.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 4 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
A quantum state ensemble of normalized states , with probabilities and , has density operatorIt is a positive semidefinite Hermitian operator with trace one, and the Born rule assigns a measurement outcome with projector the probability .
A pure state has , hence and purity of a density operator . Its only nonzero eigenvalue is one. A mixed state has at least two nonzero eigenvalues and . The spectral theorem proves the converse criteria, since the nonnegative eigenvalues sum to one. Different quantum state ensembles may give the same density operator; the mere presence of several terms in a preparation list does not make the state mixed if all positive-weight terms represent the same quantum state ray.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 3 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
Using the consistently normalized Jordan–Wigner transformation from part (c), write . Since and , the parity string givesThereforeThe orthogonal transformation , preserves the canonical anticommutation relations and diagonalizes this bilinear Hamiltonian:The Fock vacuum is , with energy . Occupying alone gives the symmetric opposite-spin state with energy ; occupying alone gives the antisymmetric state with energy ; occupying both gives , up to a global phase, with energy . This reproduces the entire spectrum in part (b).
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 3 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
There is a normalization mismatch in the printed definitions: have nonzero entries of magnitude two, whereas a single fermionic creation or annihilation operator has magnitude one. To obtain the intended Jordan–Wigner transformation, use normalized spin ladders . The given fermion expressions represent these . The two-site Jordan-Wigner normalization and signs then fix every factor unambiguously.
Put and . The canonical anticommutation relations give , , and . HenceandThese are the spin commutation relations, with distinct sites commuting. If one retains the unscaled symbols , the first and last displayed commutators instead equal ; the off-site commutators remain zero. Setting the unscaled equal to would contradict the original Pauli matrices.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 3 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
In the ordered product basis , the two-spin XY Hamiltonian isThe transverse term exchanges opposite spins and leaves parallel spins unchanged. Diagonalizing its two-dimensional block gives the complete orthonormal eigenbasisThe antisymmetric state is the singlet state; the other three are triplet states. Accidental equality of energies does not invalidate this eigenbasis.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 3 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
For bosonic creation operators and bosonic annihilation operators, the canonical commutation relations areFor fermionic annihilation operators and their adjoints, the canonical anticommutation relations areThe respective number operators are and . Their allowed eigenvalues are . In the fermionic case , so its eigenvalues must satisfy ; this is the single-mode Pauli exclusion principle.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 2 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
In the first Born approximation, let be the transferred wave number. The angular integral in the three-dimensional Fourier transform is , soWriting and , with value one at zero, the delta-shell Born amplitude givesFor the scattering is approximately isotropic, with total cross section . For it has a forward lobe of angular width of order and oscillatory zeros where . At a fixed nonzero scattering angle, its envelope decreases as . The right-hand panel of the figure shows this angular dependence.
For real the first-order scattering amplitude is real, so inserting it literally in the optical theorem would predict zero total cross section, contrary to its nonzero squared modulus. The first Born amplitude alone does not satisfy the optical theorem at order . This is an order-of-approximation issue: the squared first-order amplitude is already second order, and the second Born term supplies the required second-order imaginary forward amplitude. At first order both sides vanish. A weak-shell regime is needed for the Born truncation itself to be accurate.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 2 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
The radial S wave vanishes at the hard surface, so outside the sphere . Comparison with givesThe hard-sphere S-wave scattering amplitude and cross section are thereforeThe three prominent features are the finite low-energy limit , the oscillations with exact zeros at for positive integers , and the decreasing envelope . The zero-energy value is four times the geometric area . Near zero the normalized cross section is . The large- fall here concerns the S wave alone; summing all partial waves gives a different high-energy total.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 2 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
Integrate the squared partial-wave expansion of a scattering amplitude over the solid angle. Legendre polynomial orthogonality eliminates terms with unequal angular-momentum indices, givingAt zero scattering angle, and . ConsequentlyThis is the optical theorem. In the present elastic problem the total and elastic cross sections coincide. For an absorptive interaction the inclusive total still obeys the optical theorem, but need not equal the integral of the elastic differential cross section.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 2 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
Assume a real, central, short-range potential and elastic quantum scattering. At large radius, normalize the stationary wavefunction aswhere and is the scattering angle. Equal incoming and outgoing speeds give the differential scattering cross-section .
The partial-wave scattering expansion separates the spherical harmonics. The incident plane wave has expansion , with Spherical Bessel functions and Legendre polynomials . The regular radial solution outside the potential has asymptotic form . Its real scattering phase shift changes the ratio of outgoing to incoming waves to the Partial-wave S-matrix . Matching outgoing coefficients yieldsHere labels the orbital angular momentum, with squared magnitude . The assumption of purely elastic scattering is what makes every have unit modulus.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 1 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
Put and . The Pauli matrix multiplication law gives the pulse-and-precession spin one-half mapBecause , a suitable angle and unit vector for the rotation areIf the denominator vanishes, and the axis is arbitrary. The Bloch vector rotates through about per period; after periods the angle is . The eigenphases equivalently give quasienergies modulo .
In the two-orbital subspace the position operator is . The Heisenberg equation of motion between pulses gives , henceThus two components of the Bloch vector directly describe the mean position and momentum; its third gives the orbital population imbalance. The electric kick rotates about the position axis, leaving unchanged at the kick, while free evolution mixes the position and momentum components. Starting in , one complete period giveswhich exhibits the induced motion explicitly. These are projected two-orbital observables.
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
Use the ordered orthonormal basis . The projected Hamiltonian between pulses is , so its free time-evolution operator through a period isAcross one instantaneous pulse, integrating the Schrödinger equation givesusing the exponential of a Pauli vector. The finite free Hamiltonian contributes vanishing evolution during the zero-duration kick. A period measured immediately before successive pulses therefore consists of the kick followed by free evolution. Composition givesThis is the Floquet operator at the specified phase of the pulse train. Actual hydrogenic energy levels are not opposite numbers: the displayed convention subtracts their midpoint, with . Restoring that midpoint multiplies the result by an unobservable global phase. Likewise in the given Hamiltonian denotes the electric coupling per unit length; if it is instead a physical electric-field strength, its charge factor must be included in .
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2019 1 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
Here the dimensionless spin one-half operator is . Since the Pauli matrix obeys , the even and odd terms of the matrix exponential giveThis is the exponential of a Pauli vector for an -axis rotation. With a physical spin angular momentum , the exponent is .
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact






