By orthogonal diagonalization of the positive-definite symmetric matrix , form its positive symmetric inverse square root . Then , and is real symmetric. Let have an orthonormal eigenbasis of as its columns, so . Taking gives
Both factors of are invertible. This proves the simultaneous congruence diagonalization with a positive form by an explicit construction; it is congruence rather than simultaneous similarity.
To find the entries without constructing , take determinants in
Since , the entries are precisely the roots, with multiplicity, of . Equivalently they are the eigenvalues of , although that matrix need not itself be symmetric.
For the given , its leading principal minors are , so it is positive definite. Expanding the determinant gives
Thus the diagonal entries, in any order, are
For an inviscid fluid of constant density, with irrotational velocity and conservative body-force potential , the Unsteady Bernoulli equation is
It holds throughout a connected irrotational fluid region, up to the time-dependent gauge of . Indeed the Euler equations and imply that the gradient of the left side is zero. In the bubble problem there is no body-force contribution compatible with the assumed spherical symmetry.
Spherical incompressibility gives . The moving interface imposes , so
This potential tends to zero at infinity, where the velocity tends to zero and . Differentiate at fixed spatial , not along the moving interface: . At , pressure continuity without surface tension gives . Bernoulli therefore yields , or the Rayleigh equation for an inviscid spherical bubble
Integrating the kinetic energy over the exterior fluid gives
Differentiate and use the radius equation:
With and , the pressure-work energy balance for a spherical bubble integrates to
or
The collapsing branch takes the negative square root for . The energy gain is exactly the pressure difference times the lost bubble volume, providing a check on the sign and numerical factor.
For with real coefficients and , direct subtraction from its conjugate gives
The imaginary part remains positive, and the inverse transformation has the same form, so is a bijection of the upper half-plane. Moreover
Thus every path has the same hyperbolic length as its image. Taking the infimum over connecting paths, and using the inverse for the reverse inequality, proves every is an isometry.
Likewise
Its squared modulus and the two imaginary-part factors cancel in the quotient, proving
We can normalize any ordered distinct pair to with . First send to by , a real determinant-one Möbius transformation after rescaling its representing matrix. The stabilizer transformations
fix . Under the Cayley map , direct substitution gives . Choose to rotate the second point's nonzero disc coordinate onto the positive real axis. Its inverse image is with .
The vertical path from to has length . Any other path has length at least , so . Consequently
Invariance of both quantities transfers this equality back to every pair; coincident points satisfy it as well. Therefore
For the right-triangle identity, normalize its right vertex to and one leg to the vertical geodesic, with endpoint , . The other leg lies on the unit semicircle, with endpoint , , . These geodesics meet orthogonally at , since the metric is conformal to the Euclidean metric. The semicircle is a geodesic because a real Möbius transformation sends it to a vertical line; vertical lines are minimizing by the same length bound. The stabilizer rotations above can align any given tangent direction, giving this normal form for every right triangle.
If the legs have lengths and the opposite side has length , the distance formula gives
and
Thus the hyperbolic Pythagorean theorem is
Treat the two row totals as fixed sample sizes, with independent multinomial observations within each row. More generally let be an by table, row totals , column totals and total . Under the unrestricted alternative, row has its own category probabilities ; independence means that all rows have the same probabilities .
Ignoring the multinomial coefficients, which cancel in a likelihood ratio, the unrestricted likelihood is . Maximizing under gives . Under the null, the log likelihood is , giving . Thus the null fitted counts are , and the generalized likelihood ratio is
A zero observed count contributes zero by continuity. Small , equivalently large , is evidence against independence. The unrestricted model has free probabilities and the null has , a difference of . Under the usual large-sample likelihood-ratio approximation at an interior null, has a chi-squared distribution with that many degrees of freedom. This is the likelihood-ratio test of independence in a contingency table. Sampling the entire table multinomially instead gives the same statistic and degrees of freedom after estimating the row probabilities.
For the supplied data the fitted counts are
Substitution gives
There are degrees of freedom. The supplied 1% critical value is , and . Do not reject independence at the 0.01 level. The approximate chi-squared tail probability is . This lack of rejection does not establish that the classifications are independent; the test supplies no evidence against that null here. All fitted counts are at least ten, making the stated asymptotic approximation reasonable.
Put and separate . Multiplying Laplace's equation by gives
For the regular polynomial angular modes, and is a Legendre polynomial. The radial equation has branches and . Regularity at the origin keeps only the first inside, and decay at infinity keeps only the second outside. Continuity at identifies their coefficients, so a mode has
Its outward-minus-inward radial derivative is . The prescribed angular dependence decomposes as , since and . Hence and , with no other required modes. The spherical harmonic matching with a derivative jump gives
Both branches are harmonic in their respective regions. They agree at the sphere, and their derivative jump is . The interior is regular at zero and the exterior decays at infinity. An additional homogeneous matching mode would satisfy , so its coefficient vanishes.
Take any sequence in . Surjectivity lets us choose with . By sequential compactness of , some . Continuity gives . Thus has the Bolzano–Weierstrass property.
Now suppose is a bijection. To prove continuity of its inverse, let and put , . If , there are and a subsequence with . Sequential compactness supplies a further subsequence converging to . By continuity of , . Injectivity implies , contradicting the fixed lower distance bound. Hence . Sequential continuity is equivalent to continuity in metric spaces, proving is continuous.
Apply this to on , mapping onto the closed right semicircle . This interval is sequentially compact, and is a continuous bijection: two equal exponential values differ by an integral multiple of , impossible for distinct points of an interval of length . Consequently is continuous. For , the normalization is continuous and takes values in the open right semicircle. Therefore
is a continuous argument satisfying . Equivalently it is .
For distinct positions and positive masses, Newton's law of universal gravitation gives
The proposed homothetic gravitational motion has and pair distances , so cancellation of gives the time-independent equations
These define a Newtonian central configuration with this choice of scale. For
differentiation in gives , exactly the displayed equations. The double sum in the paper counts each pair twice, so it agrees with this expression.
Multiply the configuration equations by and sum. Pair contributions cancel, giving . Thus the total linear momentum is . Each position is parallel to its velocity, so every and the total angular momentum is zero. About any other fixed point , it is .
For , Euler's theorem allows , since are coprime integers. At every congruence holds and one may take . Let be the multiplicative order of modulo . Write a nonnegative exponent with using the Euclidean division. Then , so implies by minimality of . Thus . Negative exponents, if included, give the same conclusion using the inverse residue of .
A prime divisor of a Fermat number is odd, and satisfies . Therefore , so its multiplicative order divides . It does not divide , since modulo the odd prime. Every divisor of is a power of two, hence
By Fermat's little theorem and the divisibility just proved, , giving .

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.