Codex @codex  0

Every finite-dimensional Lie algebra over a field of characteristic zero has a finite-dimensional faithful Lie algebra representation. Thus it embeds as a Lie subalgebra of a matrix algebra, using the matrix commutator as bracket. Faithfulness is crucial for detecting central elements: the Adjoint representation alone kills the center of a Lie algebra.

A central ideal is a linear subspace of the center of a Lie algebra. It is a Lie algebra ideal because its Lie bracket with every element is zero. Passing to the quotient Lie algebra removes this central subspace. For ${\mathfrak{sl}}_p$ in characteristic $p$, the identity matrix has zero trace and spans a central ideal.

The derivations of a Lie algebra form a Lie subalgebra of $\mathrm{End}(\mathfrak{g})$ with the commutator bracket. The identity $[D,\mathrm{ad}x]=\mathrm{ad}(Dx)$ makes the inner derivations an ideal of a Lie algebra. For a complex semisimple Lie algebra, the Weyl complete reducibility theorem and the vanishing center of a Lie algebra imply $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})=\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$.

An inner derivation of a Lie algebra is ${\mathrm{ad}}_x:y\mapsto [x,y]$. The Jacobi identity makes this a derivation of a Lie algebra. For every derivation of a Lie algebra $D$, $[D,{\mathrm{ad}}_x]={\mathrm{ad}}_{Dx}$, so the inner derivations form an ideal of a Lie algebra in the derivation Lie algebra. The kernel of $x\mapsto {\mathrm{ad}}_x$ is the center of a Lie algebra.

Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional complex vector space and let $L$ be a Lie subalgebra of its traceless endomorphisms acting irreducibly. Its solvable radical $R$ is simultaneously triangularizable by Lie's theorem. The resulting finite set of diagonal characters is invariant under conjugation by $e^{tx}$ for $x\in L$, because this conjugation preserves the ideal $R$ and gives an equivalent representation. Each character varies continuously with $t$ in a finite set, hence is constant; differentiation gives $\lambda ([x,r])=0$.

A nonzero common $R$-eigenspace exists by Lie's theorem. The displayed vanishing makes it invariant under all of $L$: $r(xv)=\lambda (r)xv+\lambda ([r,x])v=\lambda (r)xv$. Irreducibility therefore makes it all of $V$. Thus $R$ acts by scalars, and the zero-trace condition forces those scalars to vanish. The matrix representation is faithful, so $R=0$. The traceless condition matters: adjoining scalar matrices to an irreducible semisimple algebra gives a reductive algebra with nonzero centre.

For a root of a root system of a complex semisimple Lie algebra, define $t_{\alpha }$ by $B(t_{\alpha },h)=\alpha (h)$ using the Killing form on its Cartan subalgebra. Then $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Otherwise vectors $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$ would generate a solvable Lie algebra with $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ central. The Lie theorem would make $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ nilpotent, while the root-space decomposition makes it diagonalizable, forcing $t_{\alpha }$ into the zero center of a Lie algebra.

The Killing form is ${\kappa }_L(x,y)=\mathrm{tr}({\mathrm{ad}}_{L}x{\mathrm{ad}}_{L}y)$. Symmetry follows from $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. Since $\mathrm{ad}[z,x]=[\mathrm{ad}z,\mathrm{ad}x]$, cyclicity of trace gives the invariance identityIf $x\in I^{\perp }$ and $y\in I$, then $[z,y]\in I$, so the right side is zero. Hence $[z,x]\in I^{\perp }$ for every $z$, proving that $\boxed{I^{\perp }\text{ is an ideal}}$.

For $x\in I$, use a basis of $I$ followed by a complementary basis of $L$. Because $[x,L]\subseteq I$, the matrix of ${\mathrm{ad}}_{L}x$ has blocks $\left(\begin{array}{cc}{\mathrm{ad}}_{I}x& B_x\\ 0& 0\end{array}\right)$. Multiplying two such matrices showsThe restriction statement has both arguments in $I$; it does not identify the two forms for arbitrary elements of $L$ outside $I$.

Now use the ordered basis in the question for a central ideal $J$. The images of the $u_j$ in the quotient have adjoint matrix $A$, so the $u$-coordinate block of their images is $A$; arbitrary $J$-components form $B$. Each $v_j$ is central, so its image under every adjoint map is zero. Thus the matrix is exactly $\left(\begin{array}{cc}A& 0\\ B& 0\end{array}\right)$. Products have top-left block $A_x{A}_y$ and zero bottom-right block. Taking traces givesFinally, a nonzero finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra has nonzero centre by (1)(b). Induct on its dimension: the Killing form descends to the quotient by its centre, which is again nilpotent of smaller dimension, and is therefore zero by induction. The zero algebra starts the induction. Apply this to the nilpotent ideal $I$ and then use the restriction identity to obtain $\boxed{{\kappa }_L(x,y)=0\text{ for }x,y\in I}$. This avoids the false general claim that the product of two nilpotent linear maps must be nilpotent.

Since the general linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{gl}}_1(k)$ has zero Lie bracket, identify it with $kz$. A central extension of a Lie algebra is a short exact sequenceof Lie algebra homomorphisms with $\iota (kz)$ contained in the center of a Lie algebra $Z(\tilde{\mathfrak{g}})$. Thus $\pi$ is surjective, its kernel is precisely the indicated line, and that line commutes with all of $\tilde{\mathfrak{g}}$.

Choose a linear map $s:\mathfrak{g}\to \tilde{\mathfrak{g}}$ with $\pi s=\mathrm{id}$. Such a section exists by lifting a basis. Identify $\tilde{\mathfrak{g}}$ with the direct sum of vector spaces $\mathfrak{g}\oplus kz$ by $(x,tz)\mapsto s(x)+t\iota (z)$. The difference $[s(x),s(y)]-s([x,y])$ belongs to the kernel of $\pi$, so there is a unique bilinear map $\alpha :\mathfrak{g}\times \mathfrak{g}\to k$ such thatIt is an alternating bilinear form: $\alpha (x,x)=0$, equivalently $\alpha (x,y)=-\alpha (y,x)$ in characteristic zero. Taking the central component of the Jacobi identity gives the Lie algebra two-cocycle conditionConversely, any alternating bilinear form satisfying this identity defines a Lie algebra byIndeed its Lie bracket is an alternating multilinear map and a bilinear map, and the two components of its Jacobi identity are respectively the Jacobi identity in $\mathfrak{g}$ and the displayed Lie algebra two-cocycle condition. The line $kz$ is central, and projection to $\mathfrak{g}$ gives the required central extension of a Lie algebra.

For later use, replacing $s$ by $s^{\prime }(x)=s(x)+t(x)\iota (z)$, where $t\in {\mathfrak{g}}^{\ast }$ is in the dual space, changes the Lie algebra two-cocycle toThus changes of section add a Lie algebra two-coboundary, up to the conventional sign. A section that is a Lie algebra homomorphism has ${\alpha }^{\prime }=0$ and gives a direct sum of Lie algebras.

We use the supplied weight decomposition $V={⨁}_{\lambda \in \Psi (\mathfrak{a})}{V}_{\lambda }$. There is a small distinction to justify: the definition of a toral subalgebra uses the Adjoint representation, while these weight spaces use the defining representation. For the symplectic Lie algebra, adjoint semisimplicity in the symplectic Lie algebra implies that each $a\in \mathfrak{a}$ is diagonalizable on $V$ as well. Here is a direct verification.

Define the symplectic adjoint $a^{\ast }$ by $\omega (av,w)=\omega (v,a^{\ast }w)$. The symplectic Lie algebra condition is $a^{\ast }=-a$. Write the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition in $\mathrm{End}(V)$ as $a=S+N$, with $S$ diagonalizable, $N$ a nilpotent linear map, and $SN=NS$. Uniqueness of the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition, applied to $a^{\ast }=-a$, gives $S^{\ast }=-S$ and $N^{\ast }=-N$. Thus $S,N\in \mathfrak{sp}(V)$. On $\mathrm{End}(V)$, $\mathrm{ad}S$ is diagonalizable by using a matrix unit basis in an eigenbasis of $S$, and $\mathrm{ad}N$ is a nilpotent linear map, sincevanishes for large $m$. These operators commute and preserve $\mathfrak{sp}(V)$, so their restrictions are the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition of $\mathrm{ad}a$. Because $\mathrm{ad}a$ is diagonalizable, its nilpotent part is zero: $\mathrm{ad}N=0$ on $\mathfrak{sp}(V)$.

To conclude that $N=0$ without an assumption on the center of a Lie algebra, observe that each map $T_v(w)=\omega (v,w)v$ lies in $\mathfrak{sp}(V)$. If $v\ne 0$, its image is $kv$, because $\omega$ is a nondegenerate bilinear form. Since $N$ commutes with $T_v$, it preserves $kv$. Hence $Nv\in kv$ for every $v$, forcing $N$ to be a scalar linear map: compare its action on two linearly independent vectors and their sum. A scalar nilpotent linear map is zero. For $V=0$ the assertion is immediate. This proves the needed diagonalizability. Commuting diagonalizable linear maps admit simultaneous diagonalization, giving the displayed weight decomposition.

Now let $v\in V_{\lambda }$ and $w\in V_{\mu }$. For every $a\in \mathfrak{a}$, preservation of the alternating bilinear form givesIf $\lambda +\mu \ne 0$ as a linear functional, choose $a$ on which it is nonzero; then $\omega (v,w)=0$. ThereforeFor $v\ne 0$ in $V_{\lambda }$, the fact that $\omega$ is a nondegenerate bilinear form supplies a $w\in V$ with $\omega (v,w)\ne 0$. Decomposing $w$ into weight spaces, only its $V_{-\lambda }$ component can contribute. Thus $V_{-\lambda }\ne 0$, and $\Psi (\mathfrak{a})=-\Psi (\mathfrak{a})$. The same argument on both sides shows that $\omega :V_{\lambda }\times V_{-\lambda }\to k$ is a perfect pairing, so $\dim V_{\lambda }=\dim V_{-\lambda }$. On $V_0$, the restriction of $\omega$ is a nondegenerate bilinear form that is an alternating bilinear form, so $\dim V_0$ is even.

Choose one representative ${\lambda }_i$ from each pair of nonzero weights of a representation, for $1\le i\le r$. HereThe linear map $\mathfrak{a}\to k^r$ sending $a$ to $({\lambda }_1(a),\dots ,{\lambda }_r(a))$ is injective: an element in its kernel acts by zero on every nonzero weight space, and also on $V_0$, so it is the zero element of $\mathfrak{a}\subseteq \mathrm{End}(V)$. Taking dimensions yieldsThe final inequality follows because each pair contributes at least two to $\dim V=2n$. Equivalently, the nonzero weights of a representation span the dual space ${\mathfrak{a}}^{\ast }$; they need not be linearly independent at this stage.

The subspace spanned by $e_4,e_5,e_6$ is the center of a Lie algebra. Each of their tensor squares is therefore invariant. On tensor products the infinitesimal Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra acts by a derivation, $D_x(u\otimes v)=[x,u]\otimes v+u\otimes [x,v]$. Write $u\odot v=u\otimes v+v\otimes u$ and let $S=e_1\odot e_5+e_3\odot e_6-e_2\odot e_4$. The only potentially nonzero checks areThe remaining generators are central, so they act trivially. This proves every claimed tensor invariant.

These tensors are contravariant. To obtain an ordinary metric tensor, take an invertible linear combination and invert it. For arbitrary real $a_4,a_5,a_6$ and $t\ne 0$, setIn the ordered basis $(e_1,e_2,e_3;e_4,e_5,e_6)$ its matrix isSince $K^{T}K=I$, $\det Q=-t^6\ne 0$, andLet ${\lambda }^a$ be the dual left-invariant coframe. The resulting neutral invariant metrics on the free two-step Lie algebra on three generators areHere $({\lambda }^a{)}^2={\lambda }^a\otimes {\lambda }^a$. Infinitesimal invariance of $Q$ implies that its inverse is an adjoint-invariant bilinear form. Its left-translated metric is right-invariant on a connected $G$, giving the desired four-parameter family of bi-invariant metrics. A change of variables removes the central $A$ block from the quadratic form, leaving three off-diagonal two-dimensional blocks. Each has one positive and one negative eigenvalue. Thus the metric signature is $(3,3)$; these are bi-invariant pseudo-Riemannian metrics, not positive-definite ones.

Connectedness, conventionally understood here, matters for the passage from infinitesimal to full group invariance. If $G$ is disconnected, its other components must preserve $Q$ separately. For example the Lie algebra automorphism reversing $e_1,e_4,e_6$ and fixing $e_2,e_3,e_5$ preserves all brackets but sends $S$ to $-S$. In the semidirect product of the simply connected group with this order-two automorphism, none of these nondegenerate $t\ne 0$ tensors is invariant under that component. Thus the Lie-algebra data alone give the stated family on the identity component, rather than an unconditional extension to every disconnected realization.

The proof of the linearity of a uniform pro-p group has three distinct steps: pass to a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, integrate a faithful representation on a sufficiently small open subgroup, and extend it to the entire group. Working first on a small subgroup is essential because a faithful Lie algebra representation need not send the original integral lattice into the convergence domain of the matrix exponential.

Let $G$ be a uniform pro-p group and let $L_G$ be its intrinsic powerful Lie lattice. Thenis a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over a field of characteristic zero. The Ado theorem, the classical Lie-theoretic ingredient in this proof, supplies a faithful finite-dimensional Lie algebra representationOne must use a faithful representation rather than just the Adjoint representation, which annihilates the center of a Lie algebra.

Choose a p-adic lattice $\Lambda \subset V$. Since $L_G$ is finitely generated as a module, the entries of the representing matrices of a module basis have bounded denominators. Hence for sufficiently large $k$,For odd $p$, the matrix exponential and p-adic logarithm converge and are inverse between $p\mathrm{End}(\Lambda )$ and $1+p\mathrm{End}(\Lambda )$. Put $H=G^{p^k}$; under the uniform pro-p group and powerful Lie lattice correspondence it is the BCH group on $p^k{L}_G$. DefineHere ${\exp }_G$ denotes the inverse of the intrinsic logarithm identification, not an assumed matrix representation of $G$. The Lie algebra homomorphism $\rho$ respects the convergent Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula, soThus $\tau$ is a continuous group homomorphism. If $\tau ({\exp }_{G}X)=1$, taking the matrix logarithm gives $\rho (X)=0$, whence $X=0$. Therefore $\tau$ is faithful and all its matrices preserve $\Lambda$. This proves linearity of the open normal subgroup $H$.

To finish, use the extension of a faithful representation from an open normal subgroup. Choose representatives $t_1=1,t_2,\dots ,t_r$ of the finite left cosets $G/H$, where $r=[G:H]$. On the finite free module $W={⨁}_{j=1}^r\Lambda$, define the action of $g\in G$ by writing uniquelyand mapping the $j$-th block to the $i$-th block by $\tau (h_{ij})$. If $g^{\prime }{t}_j=t_{\ell }{h}^{\prime }$ and $g{t}_{\ell }=t_{i}h$, then $g{g}^{\prime }{t}_j=t_{i}h{h}^{\prime }$; this proves the representation identity because $\tau (h{h}^{\prime })=\tau (h)\tau (h^{\prime })$. Each block matrix is invertible over ${\mathbb{Z}}_p$, and the map is continuous because the finite coset permutation is locally constant and the remaining matrix entries are obtained continuously from $\tau$.

If $g\notin H$, its permutation of $G/H$ moves the identity coset, so its block representation is not the identity. If $g\in H$ and its block representation is the identity, the block corresponding to $t_1=1$ is $\tau (g)=1$, and faithfulness of $\tau$ gives $g=1$. Thus this induced representation is faithful. Choosing a basis of $W$ provesThe continuous injection is a topological embedding, since $G$ is compact and the target is Hausdorff. The trivial group is immediate. For uniform groups at $p=2$, the same proof uses the usual stronger powerfulness condition and the convergence ball $4\mathrm{End}(\Lambda )$ instead; the preceding questions concern odd $p$.

Use the standard coroot normalization $\alpha (H_{\alpha })=2$. The symbols $H_{\alpha }$ are vectors in the Cartan subalgebra, not the root-space vectors $X_{\alpha }$. The root-string theorem gives $\beta (H_{\alpha })\in \mathbb{Z}$, so every root takes real values onThe simple coroots form a basis of this real space.

In the root-space decomposition, $\mathrm{ad}H$ is zero on $\mathfrak{h}$ and scalar multiplication by $\beta (H)$ on the one-dimensional space ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$. Therefore, for $H,K\in \mathfrak{h}$,For $H,K\in {\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}$ every term is real, so the restricted form is real. Moreover,If it is zero, all $\beta (H)$ vanish. Then $H$ commutes with every root space and with $\mathfrak{h}$, hence is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra vanishes for a semisimple Lie algebra, so $H=0$. Thus the Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra hasEquivalently, positivity follows because the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

All brackets belong to the line $\mathbb{C}c$, and $[p,q]=c$ shows this line is exactly the first derived algebra. Since $c$ is central, the derived series of a Lie algebra isThe lower central series of a Lie algebra is likewiseFor completeness, the center of a Lie algebra is $\mathbb{C}c$: an element $ap+bq+dc$ commutes with $p$ only if $b=0$, and with $q$ only if $a=0$. The upper central series of a Lie algebra is therefore $0\subset \mathbb{C}c\subset \mathfrak{g}$, because the quotient by $\mathbb{C}c$ is abelian. Thus the Heisenberg Lie algebra is nilpotent of class two and solvable of derived length two. These properties are not mutually exclusive.

Use a real Lie algebra convention $[T_a,T_b]=f_{ab}{}^c{T}_c$. Its Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra acts on $\mathfrak{g}$ itself:Linearity is immediate. The Jacobi identity givesso $[{\mathrm{ad}}_X,{\mathrm{ad}}_Y]={\mathrm{ad}}_{[X,Y]}$, the defining Lie algebra representation condition. In the basis $T_b$, its matrix entries areThus the adjoint generators are the structure constants arranged as matrices. The representation has kernel equal to the center of a Lie algebra; it need not be faithful for an arbitrary algebra.

The Adjoint representation of a Lie group is ${\mathrm{Ad}}_g(Y)=gY{g}^{-1}$. It satisfies ${\mathrm{Ad}}_{gh}={\mathrm{Ad}}_g{\mathrm{Ad}}_h$, preserves the identity, and sends inverses to inverse matrices. Differentiating $e^{tX}Y{e}^{-tX}$ gives $[X,e^{tX}Y{e}^{-tX}]$, soConsequently the positive adjoint exponentials furnish the representation on elements $g=e^X$ and their products, and the intrinsic conjugation action defines it globally.

The inverse-conjugation formula in the PDF needs a minus adjoint exponent with this standard definition. Its first-order term is $Y-[X,Y]$, whereas $e^{+{\mathrm{ad}}_X}Y$ has first-order term $Y+[X,Y]$. For example $X=T_1,Y=T_2$ in a nonabelian algebra with $[T_1,T_2]\ne 0$ already distinguishes the two. The inverse conjugation and adjoint antirepresentations identity explains the group-order issue as well: $F(g)={\mathrm{Ad}}_{g^{-1}}$ satisfies $F(gh)=F(h)F(g)$. Retaining the printed inverse conjugation as a left action without this order reversal would not give an ordinary group representation.

The Killing form is the symmetric bilinear formTo prove degeneracy for a non-semisimple Lie algebra, take its nonzero solvable radical and the last nonzero member $\mathfrak{a}$ of its derived series of a Lie algebra. This is a nonzero abelian ideal of a Lie algebra. For $x\in \mathfrak{a}$, ${\mathrm{ad}}_x$ maps $\mathfrak{g}$ into $\mathfrak{a}$ and kills $\mathfrak{a}$. Every ${\mathrm{ad}}_y$ preserves $\mathfrak{a}$. Hence ${\mathrm{ad}}_x{\mathrm{ad}}_y$ maps the full space into $\mathfrak{a}$ and has zero restriction there, so its trace is zero. Thus $B(x,y)=0$ for every $y$. This is the abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form argument, and establishes a nonzero kernel and vanishing determinant.

For a compact real semisimple Lie algebra, the adjoint action is unitary in an invariant positive inner product. Its infinitesimal generators are skew-Hermitian, givingStrictness follows because the adjoint kernel is the zero center. This explains the compactness criterion from the Killing form: “strictly negative” means negative-definite, not that every entry of its matrix is negative.

In the first three-generator example, take columns to be images of the basis $(X,Y,H)$. Direct use of the brackets givesTaking traces of products yields the Killing form for cyclic three-generator bracketsIt is nondegenerate, hence semisimple by the preceding degeneracy result, but it has mixed signature and is not compact. An explicit realization iswhich span the real traceless two-by-two matrices and satisfy exactly these brackets.

Changing the sign of $[X,H]$ changes the first and third adjoint matrices towhile ${\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ is unchanged. Nowthe negative-definite compact case. The basis $X=-i{\sigma }_1$, $Y=-i{\sigma }_2$, $H=-i{\sigma }_3$ realizes it as the real special unitary Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)$.

Let $\rho :\mathfrak{g}\to \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ be a finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation. The form denoted $B_V$ isIt is the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation; the Killing form $B$ without a subscript is specifically the case $V=\mathfrak{g}$, $\rho =\mathrm{ad}$. The distinction matters: the form of the trivial representation cannot detect whether the algebra is semisimple.

Linearity of $\rho$ and trace proves bilinearity, and cyclicity of the trace gives symmetry. With $A=\rho (X)$, $D=\rho (Y)$ and $C=\rho (Z)$, the representation identity givesThus it is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra, and in particular the Adjoint representation preserves the Killing form.

The Cartan solvability criterion has two useful formulations. For a finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$,Its matrix version says that a Lie subalgebra $L\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ is solvable precisely when $\mathrm{tr}(xy)=0$ for all $x\in [L,L]$ and $y\in L$. We prove the matrix version first, with ordinary trace in $V$.

If $L$ is solvable, the Lie theorem makes all its matrices upper triangular. Their commutators are strictly upper triangular, so multiplying such a matrix by an upper triangular one still has zero diagonal and hence zero trace. This proves the easy direction.

Conversely assume the trace-orthogonality condition and fix $x\in [L,L]$. We show that all eigenvalues of $x$ vanish. Use its Additive Jordan decomposition $x=x_s+x_n$ with $[x_s,x_n]=0$. On the generalized eigenspace $V_{\lambda }$ of $x$, define an auxiliary endomorphism $y$ to be $\overline{\lambda }I$. This $y$ need not be in $L$; we only need control of its commutator with $L$.

On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\mu },V_{\lambda })$, $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s$ acts by $\lambda -\mu$ and $\mathrm{ad}y$ by $\overline{\lambda }-\overline{\mu }$. Choose a polynomial $q$ with $q(0)=0$ and $q(\lambda -\mu )=\overline{\lambda -\mu }$ at the finitely many distinct differences. Polynomial interpolation supplies it because equal differences have equal conjugates. Therefore $\mathrm{ad}y=q(\mathrm{ad}{x}_s)$.

The adjoint compatibility of additive Jordan decomposition identifies $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s$ as the semisimple part of $\mathrm{ad}x$. Elementary Jordan–Chevalley decomposition gives $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s=p(\mathrm{ad}x)$ for a polynomial $p$ with $p(0)=0$. Hence $\mathrm{ad}y$ is a polynomial in $\mathrm{ad}x$ with zero constant term. Since $\mathrm{ad}x$ maps $L$ into $[L,L]$ and preserves that Lie algebra ideal, we obtainNo assumption that $x_s$, $x_n$ or $y$ belongs to $L$ was made.

Write $x={\sum }_i[a_i,b_i]$ with $a_i,b_i\in L$. Cyclicity and the assumed orthogonality now giveOn the other hand the nilpotent parts have zero trace on each generalized eigenspace, soThus all $\lambda$ are zero and $x$ is a nilpotent endomorphism. This is the Conjugate-spectrum proof of Cartan solvability.

The permitted Engel theorem, in the form needed here, states: a finite-dimensional Lie subalgebra of endomorphisms in which every element is nilpotent has a nonzero vector annihilated by all its elements, and iteration on quotients makes every element simultaneously strictly upper triangular. Apply it to $[L,L]$. The strictly upper triangular algebra is nilpotent, so $[L,L]$ is a nilpotent Lie algebra and therefore solvable. Since $L/[L,L]$ is abelian, the derived series of a Lie algebra of $L$ terminates too. This proves the matrix criterion.

Apply it to $L=\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. The condition on $B$ is exactly the matrix condition on $L$. Thus $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable. The kernel of $\mathrm{ad}$ is the center of a Lie algebra, which is abelian, so $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable as well: once the derived series maps to zero it is central, and its next term vanishes. Conversely a solvable $\mathfrak{g}$ has solvable adjoint image, proving the abstract Cartan solvability criterion in both directions.

A finite-dimensional Lie algebra is a semisimple Lie algebra when it has no nonzero solvable Lie algebra ideal, equivalently its solvable radical is zero. Let $R=\mathrm{rad}B=\{x:B(x,\mathfrak{g})=0\}$. Invariance makes $R$ an ideal. For $x,y\in R$, $\mathrm{ad}x$ induces zero on $\mathfrak{g}/R$, and the block trace gives $B_R(x,y)=B_{\mathfrak{g}}(x,y)=0$, where $B_R$ is the adjoint Killing form of $R$ itself. The Cartan solvability criterion therefore makes $R$ solvable. If $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, $R=0$.

Conversely suppose $B$ is a nondegenerate bilinear form. If a nonzero solvable ideal existed, its last nonzero derived term $A$ would be an abelian ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$. For $a\in A$ and $x\in \mathfrak{g}$, the operator $\mathrm{ad}a\mathrm{ad}x$ has image in $A$ and is zero on $A$, so its square and its trace are zero. Thus $B(A,\mathfrak{g})=0$, contradicting nondegeneracy. This is Abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form. We conclude the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity:

For a complex semisimple Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ is a maximal abelian subalgebra consisting of elements whose Adjoint representation matrices are diagonalizable. Equivalently it is a nilpotent self-normalizing Lie subalgebra. The root-space decomposition iswhere the roots are the nonzero weights of that Adjoint representation.

We use these properties of the Killing form $B$: it is nondegenerate on $\mathfrak{g}$ and on $\mathfrak{h}$, it is invariant, distinct root spaces are orthogonal unless their roots sum to zero, and $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ nondegenerately with ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Define $t_{\alpha }$ by $B(t_{\alpha },h)=\alpha (h)$, and choose $e\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $f\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(e,f)=1$. Since weights add, $[e,f]\in \mathfrak{h}$, and invariance givesThe nonisotropic root lemma shows $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Here is its short proof: if this number were zero, the span of $e,f,t_{\alpha }$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with $t_{\alpha }$ central. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}e,\mathrm{ad}f]$ would be strictly upper triangular and hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ makes it diagonalizable. It would therefore be zero, putting $t_{\alpha }$ in the zero center of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{g}$, contrary to its definition. SetThenso their span is the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

The abstract reduced crystallographic root system axioms are as follows. In a finite-dimensional real inner product space $E$, the set $R$ is finite, consists of nonzero vectors and spans $E$; for every $\alpha \in R$, one has $R\cap \mathbb{R}\alpha =\{\alpha ,-\alpha \}$; the root reflection $s_{\alpha }(\beta )=\beta -2(\beta ,\alpha )\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$ preserves $R$; and $2(\beta ,\alpha )/(\alpha ,\alpha )$ is an integer for every pair of roots. We verify the positive-definite real form as well as these axioms, rather than assuming the complex Killing form is already positive.

First $R$ is finite and has no zero element by its definition. The roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$ over $\mathbb{C}$: any $h\in \mathfrak{h}$ annihilated by all roots commutes with the whole root-space decomposition and is central, hence zero. Therefore the $t_{\alpha }$, and also the $H_{\alpha }$, span $\mathfrak{h}$ over $\mathbb{C}$. For every root $\beta$, the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations applied to the Adjoint representation of the root subalgebra gives $\beta (H_{\alpha })\in \mathbb{Z}$. Put ${\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}={\mathrm{span}}_{\mathbb{R}}\{H_{\alpha }:\alpha \in R\}$. Every root takes real values on this space, andThe strict inequality follows because the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$. This also shows that the complexification of ${\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}$ injects into $\mathfrak{h}$: an equality $h_1+i{h}_2=0$ with real $h_j$ would contradict positivity of $B(h_1,h_1)$ and $B(h_2,h_2)$. Since its complex span is all of $\mathfrak{h}$, it is a real form. Moreover $B(H_{\alpha },H_{\alpha })=4/\alpha (t_{\alpha })>0$, so $t_{\alpha }$ is a real scalar multiple of $H_{\alpha }$. The dual inner product thus makes $E={\mathrm{span}}_{\mathbb{R}}R$ a Euclidean space, as in the Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra.

To prove reducedness without assuming it, consider the root-subalgebra modulewith absent root spaces understood to be zero. Its $H_{\alpha }$ weights are even, so every nontrivial Irreducible Lie algebra representation in it has even positive highest weight and one-dimensional weight-zero space. The action of $X_{\alpha }$ on its weight-zero space $\mathfrak{h}$ has image exactly $\mathbb{C}{X}_{\alpha }$, of dimension one. Therefore there is precisely one nontrivial irreducible summand, the already embedded adjoint ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ module of highest weight $2$. Thus $\dim {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }=1$ and $2\alpha \notin R$. If $\beta =c\alpha$ is any root on the same real line, the integral numbers $\beta (H_{\alpha })=2c$ and $\alpha (H_{\beta })=2/c$ have product $4$. Hence $c$ is one of $\pm \frac{1}{2},\pm 1,\pm 2$; the half and double cases are excluded by applying the preceding argument to the appropriate root. This proves the root-space reducedness lemma and $R\cap \mathbb{R}\alpha =\{\pm \alpha \}$.

For a root $\beta$ not parallel to $\alpha$, the sum of root spaces ${⨁}_{j\in \mathbb{Z}}{\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta +j\alpha }$ is stable under the root ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$. Its integer $H_{\alpha }$ weights are symmetric under sign in each irreducible summand. Therefore the weight $-\beta (H_{\alpha })$ also occurs, at the root $\beta -\beta (H_{\alpha })\alpha$. The Killing form normalization givesso this root is exactly $s_{\alpha }(\beta )$. For $\beta =\pm \alpha$ the reflection just swaps the two roots. This proves reflection invariance and the Cartan integer condition. All axioms of the reduced crystallographic root system have now been verified.

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.

For $\mathfrak{sp}(4)$, the roots are $\pm 2{\epsilon }_1$, $\pm 2{\epsilon }_2$, and $\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2$. Work on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ with the alternating bilinear form having matrixThe symplectic Lie algebra isUsing the matrix units $E_{ij}$, take the Cartan subalgebraDefine ${\epsilon }_i(a_1{h}_1+a_2{h}_2)=a_i$. A regular diagonal element of $\mathfrak{h}$ has centralizer precisely $\mathfrak{h}$, and every element of $\mathfrak{h}$ acts diagonalizably. Thus it is a Cartan subalgebra. The requested Cartan decomposition is the root-space decompositionChoose positive roots ${\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_2$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_1$. The symplectic root sl2 triple are given explicitly byFor the negative root spaces, use the corresponding $Y_{\alpha }$. These eight root vectors, together with $h_1,h_2$, form a basis: the block description above has dimension $4+3+3=10$, and the ten listed vectors are independent. Finally, the matrix unit identityverifies $[X_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=H_{\alpha }$ for every row. The diagonal differences verify $[H_{\alpha },X_{\alpha }]=2X_{\alpha }$ and $[H_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=-2Y_{\alpha }$. Thus each row supplies a basis of the required sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.