Collisionless Jeans dispersion relation 2026-10-06
Linearize the Collisionless Boltzmann equation and the perturbation Poisson equation about a homogeneous velocity distribution . A plane wave gives . Integrating this density and using yields . Growing modes have and no real-velocity pole; real and damped frequencies require the causal continuation prescription. The Newtonian homogeneous background requires the Jeans swindle.
Collisionless stellar system 2026-10-06
A collisionless stellar system is one for which discrete gravitational encounters change its distribution negligibly over the time under study, usually . Stars can orbit and respond collectively to a varying smooth gravitational potential even in this regime; collisionless does not mean force-free or stable against collective gravitational instabilities. Its smooth distribution follows the Collisionless Boltzmann equation.
Jeans equation Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
The Jeans equations are velocity moments of the Collisionless Boltzmann equation. They relate density, mean motion, velocity dispersion, and gravitational acceleration without requiring a closed fluid equation of state.
Jeans theorem 2026-09-28
Jeans theorem states that a steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation solution depends on phase-space coordinates only through integrals of motion, and that a nonnegative function of isolating integrals gives a steady collisionless distribution function on its domain.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 75 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use physical momentum and conserved-background comoving momentum . At fixed , the homogeneous collisionless phase-space distribution function is , with no spatial or angular dependence and no explicit background time derivative. The printed relation cannot have this meaning: freely propagating physical momentum redshifts as , so it should read . Keeping the printed relation literally would give and a nonzero zeroth-order redshift, inconsistent with the target equation. The standard definition is positively confirmed by the phase-space convention in Ma and Bertschinger's perturbation treatment.
With this conserved , the orders of the factors are:
- is first order; the zeroth-order collisionless equation has already made .
- is first order, while has a zeroth-order free-streaming velocity and first-order corrections. Their product contributes at first order only through that background velocity.
- begins at zeroth order; begins at first order. Its leading product is .
- begins at first order, and begins at first order because background trajectories keep their direction. Their product is second order and drops out.
Thus the linear Collisionless Boltzmann equation isFor photons . For a particle of mass , . The order counting does not assume that the first-order angular deflection itself vanishes; only its multiplication by an already perturbed angular distribution makes it higher order.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 59 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . A comoving observer measures photon energy , so . The null condition is . Using the stated Christoffel symbols in the time geodesic equation givesDivide by to differentiate with respect to conformal time. The background redshift term cancels when differentiating :In the perturbation term use the background relation , givingWithout metric tensor perturbations, both and the propagation direction are constant along an unperturbed ray. Thus and are first order. Multiplying them by derivatives of , which is also first order, gives second-order terms. The term is first order and must be retained. At linear order the Collisionless Boltzmann equation therefore readsTaking the Fourier transform in the spatial coordinates provesA first-order correction to the propagation velocity multiplying a spatial derivative of is likewise second order.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 66 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First velocity moment. Assume a stationary, spherical, nonstreaming collisionless stellar system with constant mass-to-light ratio . Use a luminosity-weighted galactic distribution function, with luminosity density . Multiplying the Collisionless Boltzmann equation by and integrating over velocities, with its velocity-space boundary terms vanishing, givesSpherical symmetry makes the stress tensorHere is one tangential component, as in the paper; the total tangential variance is . Its radial divergence is , since the divergence of the radial unit vector is . With the velocity-anisotropy parameter , and enclosed mass , this gives the Spherical Jeans equationThis uses a constant ratio of total gravitating mass to luminosity, rather than an arbitrary independent dark halo.
Projection and elimination of anisotropy. Write for projected radius and for spherical radius. The Abel transform of the luminosity density giveswhose inverse is the displayed density inversion in the paper. At a point on this line of sight, . The line-of-sight second stellar velocity moment is . Therefore the measured quantity satisfiesThe Spherical Jeans equation gives . Substitution yieldsThe inner printed in the PDF's definition of must therefore be : the literal expression has an extra gravitational factor and lacks the density. Both this derivation and dimensional consistency require the correction. Define the projected spherical Jeans residual byTo express it entirely in terms of the radial stress, putDifferentiating the nonsingular representation gives . HenceIf vanishes at zero and infinity, then . These are the absence-of-boundary-stress conditions needed for the global result.
The virial relation, term by term. Interchange the order in the residual integral and useIt follows thatThe first term is : spherical averaging assigns one third of the integrated velocity-square to any fixed viewing direction, giving . The gravitational potential energy isThus the integrated residual is exactly , and its vanishing is the virial theorem. Solving for gives the global projected virial estimate of a mass-to-light ratio,It is independent of the radial anisotropy profile when the full aperture and the stated boundary conditions are used. A finite aperture retains a boundary term.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 66 3 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use for the gravitational parameter, to distinguish it from the Delaunay action called . The displayed actions are per unit reduced mass. Accordingly use specific canonical momenta; with physical relative momenta, all three actions acquire a common reduced-mass factor, which leaves the eccentricity fraction below unchanged.
The canonical transformation. In spherical coordinates, separation of the Kepler Hamilton-Jacobi equation givesA local type-two generating function, continued across turning points with the appropriate momentum branches, isThe old momenta are and the new angles are , , . This defines a canonical transformation, since its generating differential is . With standard choices of angle origins, the resulting Delaunay variables arewith the mean anomaly, the argument of periapsis, and the longitude of ascending node. In particular, the signed includes retrograde orbits; the squared equation in the PDF must not be read as .
For bound noncollision Kepler orbits, the independent ranges areThe limiting circular, radial and coplanar cases sit on boundaries where some angle charts degenerate. They have zero measure in the generic phase-volume calculation. The ranges are constrained as above, rather than a Cartesian box with three unconstrained actions.
The eccentricity count. A canonical transformation preserves phase space volume, soIntegrating the three angles contributes , and integrating gives . At fixed , the condition that the orbital eccentricity be less than is . ThusAny energy weight cancels between these integrals. If the total population is finite, or an explicit finite action band is used,This is the Delaunay phase-volume proof of the thermal eccentricity distribution. The source's law is a cumulative count, not a differential eccentricity density. Also, pointwise finite does not alone imply finite : gives . The finite normalization of an energy-only Kepler distribution is the additional condition needed for a global probability statement; the fraction at every fixed energy is unaffected.
Why the observation does not imply relaxation or equilibrium. No Boltzmann distribution was used: every normalizable energy-only phase-space distribution function has the same eccentricity marginal, irrespective of collisional thermalization. An even stronger counterexample is a genuinely time-dependent collisionless distributionKepler motion has and constant actions and other angles, so : this is an exact nonstationary solution of the Collisionless Boltzmann equation. Integrating removes the cosine and leaves precisely the same cumulative count at every time. An eccentricity marginal alone cannot establish thermal relaxation, a relaxed age, or even a stationary distribution.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 55 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Express the Collisionless Boltzmann equation in variables and divide the derivative along the photon ray by . Since has no explicit position, direction or conformal-time dependence,This is the chain rule in momentum magnitude and direction. At linear order, , while the last two terms are products of first-order perturbations and can be dropped. The synchronous photon momentum redshift from part i then gives, for spatial Fourier convention ,The factor is essential. It is missing in the PDF's displayed intermediate equation, but follows directly from part i and is needed to obtain its final brightness equation.
Let . Absorbing the common phase-space normalization into , the homogeneous photon energy density is , so the photon brightness perturbation isA small directional temperature change in a Planck distribution gives . Integration by parts yieldsbecause the Planck distribution behaves as at low momentum and decays exponentially at high momentum. Thus . Equivalently, frequency-integrated blackbody radiation energy scales as . Identifying brightness with a single temperature perturbation assumes this blackbody spectral form; the brightness integral itself is defined more generally.
Finally, multiply the corrected transport equation by , integrate and divide by . The spatial streaming factor is independent of , while its gravitational source integrates to . ThereforeThis derives the synchronous photon brightness equation with the normalization and sign fixed, rather than inferring it from the dimensionally inconsistent intermediate formula.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write for the gravitational parameter of the relative Kepler orbit, and use specific orbital energy and momenta per unit reduced mass. The Hamiltonian isIf physical momenta rather than these specific momenta are used, multiply the actions by the reduced mass. This only introduces a constant factor into the phase space measure and leaves the eccentricity fractions unchanged. The formulas in the question adopt the specific-action convention.
Here is an explicit local canonical transformation. A separated complete integral of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation isChoose branches along an orbit and take , , , . Thenwhose exterior derivative proves preservation of the canonical symplectic form. Thus these variables are canonical, and the absolute Jacobian determinant is one. The angular separation gives and , including the sign of the angular momentum along the reference axis.
For clarity, the radial action can be evaluated rather than assumed. Let , with the eccentric anomaly. Then , andIn the integral, use and . The polar action is , while the signed azimuthal action is . The separated angular coordinates have the usual Delaunay variables interpretation: is the argument of periapsis, and is the longitude of ascending node. In particular,with a suitable origin at periapsis, so is the mean anomaly. We have therefore recoverednot merely assigned names to the new coordinates.
For nondegenerate bound Kepler orbits, the ranges areThe boundaries describe circular, coplanar or radial degeneracies, where some angles cease to be defined; they have zero measure in the present calculation. The actions are canonical coordinates with nested bounds, rather than three independently unrestricted Cartesian coordinates. The square of alone would miss the distinction between prograde and retrograde inclinations.
By the canonical transformation, the population measure becomesAt fixed , the condition is . Integrating all three angles and then givesConsequently the Delaunay phase-volume proof of the thermal eccentricity distribution yieldsThe PDF's dependence must be interpreted as a cumulative distribution function, not an eccentricity probability density function or the value of the original six-dimensional phase-space distribution function. A finite value of at every energy also does not suffice to make the total population finite: on all bound energies gives the divergent integral . The fractions are well defined at each fixed energy, over a finite allowed energy range, or for an energy distribution with a finite total integral.
A Boltzmann distribution is therefore unnecessary. Any normalizable energy-only distribution has the same eccentricity marginal, although such a distribution is a collisionless steady state by Jeans theorem. The marginal alone does not even prove stationarity: for ,is a positive time-dependent solution of the Collisionless Boltzmann equation and has exactly the same eccentricity marginal after integration over . An observed cumulative law establishes neither thermal relaxation nor the age of the system or Universe.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Assume a stationary, spherical, nonrotating collisionless stellar system, a constant mass-to-light ratio , and vanishing boundary stresses at infinity. Let be the luminosity density, so , and set . Distinguish spatial radius from projected radius . The enclosed luminosity and radial force areHere is the velocity dispersion of either one of the two tangential components; thus . If a combined tangential variance is used instead, its contribution must be divided by two in this definition.
To derive the Jeans equation, start with the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation . Multiply by and integrate over all velocities. Integration by parts in velocity, with decaying fast enough to eliminate boundary terms, givesThe same equation holds with luminosity weighting because the tracer's luminosity is conserved along its orbit. Spherical symmetry makes the local stellar velocity moment tensor diagonal, with entries , , . Its radial divergence is : the second term accounts for the changing directions of the radial and tangential unit vectors. ThereforeThis is the Spherical Jeans equation; it follows from a stellar velocity moment rather than requiring a particular form of the galactic distribution function.
Integrating the luminosity density along a line of sight gives its surface brightness:The second identity is Spherical Abel deprojection. For the second stellar velocity moment, the angle between the radial direction and the line of sight has . The line-of-sight velocity dispersion is therefore , andFrom the Spherical Jeans equation, . Substitution producesThe primary PDF has a genuine symbol error in its projected gravity term: it prints a second multiplying inside the integral, where is required. The corrected projected spherical Jeans residual isTo justify the derivative at the singular-looking lower limit, write . Differentiation then gives . In particular, . If tends to zero both at zero and infinity, as for a finite isolated equilibrium with sufficiently decaying stresses,If a boundary stress survives, its contribution must be retained; the zero-integral statement is not a finite-aperture identity.
Now identify each integral with a term in the virial theorem. Let be the total kinetic energy, including all three random components, and the gravitational potential energy. Averaging over spatial directions in a spherical system gives one third of the total stellar velocity moment along any chosen line of sight, even if the velocities are locally anisotropic. ThusBuilding the spherical mass shell by shell givesFinally, Fubini theorem and give the gravitational contribution to the residual integral explicitly:ConsequentlyThe global projected virial estimate of a mass-to-light ratio is independent of the velocity-anisotropy parameter under these assumptions. It does not remove the mass--anisotropy--density degeneracy for arbitrary radial mass profiles. In particular, if an independent dark matter halo makes mass fail to follow light, a single constant is no longer the physical enclosed mass-to-light ratio at every radius.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In an axisymmetric cylindrical coordinate system, the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation isLet and . Multiply by and integrate over velocities. The spatial terms give . Integration by parts in supplies , and the derivative supplies . The force term vanishes because does not depend on . This assumes sufficient decay of the galactic distribution function to discard all velocity boundary terms. The radial Jeans equation is consequentlyReflection symmetry about makes even and odd. At the midplane the latter vanishes, and . Multiplying by provesAll quadratic velocities here are population moments, not individual stellar velocities. In particular, symmetry does not make the midplane tilt contribution to asymmetric drift disappear: an odd mixed moment can have a nonzero derivative at zero.
For application to the Milky Way, assume negligible mean radial and vertical flows, and define the circular speed by . Write and . Rearranging gives the exact stress-support relationThus the stellar asymmetric drift is the right-hand side divided by . For , this denominator is approximately . If and locally, the bracket becomes , making the density and dispersion-gradient contributions explicit.
A radially declining random-motion stress supplies some of the force needed to support a galactic disk, so its stars need less ordered azimuthal motion than a population on circular orbits. Hotter, often older, stellar populations therefore generally rotate more slowly than cold populations in the same gravitational potential; this is the observed stellar asymmetric drift. It is a stress-support effect, not a frictional slowing of each orbit. For a velocity ellipsoid aligned approximately with spherical coordinates, , and the midplane tilt term contributes rather than zero.
Local measurements of mean rotation and all components of the velocity dispersion, combined with tracer-density and dispersion gradients, can therefore constrain and the radial Newtonian gravitational field. A hotter sample's mean rotation must not be identified directly with the circular speed. The tracer number density need not be the gravitating mass density. Nonaxisymmetric streaming, a nonstationary disk, poorly measured radial gradients, or a neglected tilt term can bias this inference; these are assumptions of the derivation rather than extra free corrections to the circular force.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First consider a genuinely one-dimensional, time-independent collisionless stellar system with Hamiltonian . Choose . For bound vertical oscillations, a phase-mixed population has equal occupations of the upward and downward branches of each orbit. By Jeans theorem, its stationary distribution is a function of the conserved vertical energy, . Equivalently, the one-dimensional Collisionless Boltzmann equation makes constant along the energy curves. Branch-dependent incoming and outgoing populations or time-dependent waves would not satisfy this assumption.
Integrate both signs of and change variable to :The density is thus an Abel transform of the vertical-energy distribution. To invert it without simply quoting an inversion rule, apply a second integral and exchange its order:The inner integral is , as follows by setting . Writing before differentiating avoids an artificial infinite endpoint term. Under sufficient differentiability and decay,The vertical-energy Abel inversion of a stellar distribution is thereforeThis proves the normalization, including the factor from the two velocity signs. The additive origin of merely changes the origin of energy.
For this expression to define a physical phase-space distribution function, must be expressible as a single-valued function of , the integrals and differentiated integral must converge, and the resulting must be nonnegative. Reflection symmetry and a potential increasing with provide the usual single-valued relation on either side of the disk. A sufficiently smooth decreasing is a sufficient condition for nonnegativity; it is not asserted to be necessary for every positive energy distribution. If there is a finite escape energy, replace the infinite limits by that energy and impose the appropriate cutoff and boundary conditions. The displayed infinite-limit formula presumes either a confining potential or a distribution extended by zero above its allowed energy, with no omitted boundary population.
A three-dimensional galactic disk does not automatically meet these hypotheses. Exact separation makes an integral of motion. If the full galactic distribution function factorizes into an in-plane factor and a vertical factor , integrating the in-plane velocities gives the required one-dimensional distribution after its normalization is absorbed into . More generally the vertical marginal must depend only on in the sample being analysed. Near the solar radius, approximate separation can be useful when the sampled heights and radial excursions are small relative to the scales over which the vertical force changes with . If only a slowly varying vertical action is conserved, replacing it by one fixed requires an additional controlled local approximation.
The population must be sufficiently stationary and phase mixed, with negligible mean vertical flow, and the data must measure a well-defined tracer population with a known selection function. Radial coupling and the tilted velocity ellipsoid must be negligible or modelled. In the full vertical Jeans equation, that coupling is ; it cannot generally be discarded merely because a mixed moment vanishes at the midplane. The tracer number density is not the mass density producing the potential.
To infer the local mass, measure the tracer density as a function of height and its vertical velocity distribution near the midplane. With , the latter directly samples . Insert that measured distribution into the forward integral for , and match it to the observed to infer . Equivalently, for trial potentials compute away from the plane, apply the inversion, and require agreement with the measured velocities. Density data alone do not determine both an unknown potential and an unknown energy distribution.
Once the vertical force is known, use the full axisymmetric Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity, rather than identifying every vertical derivative with density in isolation:At the midplane, , soIn terms of the circular-orbit Oort constants, and , the radial term equals . It vanishes for a locally flat rotation curve, not for an arbitrary rotating disk. An integrated version gives the dynamical surface density from vertical stellar motions:Here the actual vertical acceleration is . The sign of the radial correction follows directly from the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity.
For an illustrative isothermal tracer with constant vertical velocity dispersion , takeThe velocity integral gives , hence . For a locally flat rotation curve this yieldsThis example shows explicitly how a measured tracer scale and velocity scale constrain the gravitating density; using the tracer's own density as the mass source would instead impose an unjustified self-gravitating model.
The inferred density includes luminous and faint stars, gas and dark matter. Comparing it with an independently estimated baryonic census tests for extra gravitating mass. An excess need not be a dark disk: a dark matter halo also contributes to the local force. Conversely, agreement with the baryonic density locally does not exclude a halo at other radii or heights. Vertical disequilibrium, radial mixing, errors in selection or tracer populations, and neglected velocity tilt can mimic a mass discrepancy, so the one-dimensional equilibrium assumptions must be tested when interpreting such an inference.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 69 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An integral of motion is a function of phase space that is constant along a trajectory. Put , so the stellar acceleration is . In a time-independent spherical Newtonian gravitational potential,The second equality uses the radial direction of . Thus both the binding energy and the full specific angular momentum vector are integrals of motion.
The Collisionless Boltzmann equation isFor a stationary galactic distribution function, this says on every characteristic, so is constant on each stellar orbit. Locally choose a complete set of orbit labels , themselves integrals of motion; constancy along the characteristic means . Conversely, for any such differentiable , the chain rule gives . This proves Jeans theorem in its orbit-invariance form. It does not claim that just two particular integrals classify every orbit in an arbitrary potential. For the specified spherical model, is a rotationally invariant stationary choice.
For the velocity integration, write , , , and set . At fixed position the velocity-dependent factor isUse and integrate over . The mass density isSince ,These integrals use the stated untruncated galactic distribution function over all velocities; an additional escape-energy cutoff would change the result.
In local orthogonal velocity components the same exponent is . Each component is a centred Gaussian distribution. The one-dimensional identity yieldsIn particular the velocity-anisotropy parameter is . This is Gaussian angular-momentum suppression in a stellar distribution.
The radial laws also require self-consistency through the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity:For , outside a sufficiently small core, the model is almost isotropic and isothermal. Seek its scale-free envelope with . Its distribution-density relation gives , and the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity gives . Thus the intended intermediate singular isothermal sphere behaviour iswhere a core scale is .
The stated law cannot be the actual central limit of a regular finite-density model. For finite and , regularity and the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity instead giveand . A broad intermediate region exists only if ; the radius alone does not ensure it.
For the outer radially anisotropic isothermal halo asymptotics, put , and . At the density relation and Poisson equation becomeThe slow outer balance is , so , giving . Its consistency check is , for which . ThereforeThe reference radius changes only subleading logarithmic terms. The circular speed falls as , rather than remaining exactly flat.
Physically, the model has an almost isotropic central region and, if the scales separate, a flat-rotation isothermal envelope. Beyond , suppression of large specific angular momentum leaves predominantly radial orbits: radial velocity dispersion remains , while transverse dispersion falls as . The outer density acquires a logarithmic suppression and the galaxy rotation curve declines slowly. The enclosed mass still grows approximately as , so this untruncated model has infinite total mass.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 64 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the photon phase-space coordinates , with and its propagation direction. Divide the Collisionless Boltzmann equation by and apply the chain rule. The homogeneous blackbody distribution is time independent at fixed comoving momentum because its physical temperature scales as . ThereforeOn the unperturbed ray ; its correction is first order and multiplies the first-order spatial gradient of . Similarly and are first order, so their products with derivatives of are second order. The zeroth-order distribution has no directional dependence. Keeping only linear terms and using givesAfter Fourier transforming with and , the Free-streaming photon Boltzmann equation in synchronous variables isDirection deflection is a real first-order geodesic effect, but its effect on the already perturbed distribution starts at second order here.
Let , so in the phase-space normalization being used . The photon brightness perturbation is . This agrees with the stated density normalization, and is independent of conformal time. Integrating the distribution equation givesFor a Planck distribution, the endpoint term vanishes. Integration by parts yields . Thus the synchronous photon brightness equation isFor a small directional blackbody temperature shift , expansion gives . The same integral then gives , also following from blackbody energy density proportional to . This temperature interpretation presumes a perturbed blackbody shape; frequency-integrated brightness can still be defined for more general distributions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 62 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write and use summation over repeated Cartesian indices. A mass-normalized galactic distribution function obeys the Collisionless Boltzmann equationAssume decays in velocity sufficiently fast that the necessary boundary terms vanish. Its zeroth velocity moment gives the continuity equationFor the first velocity moment, multiply by and integrate. In the gravitational term, integration by parts gives . ThereforeThe velocity-dispersion tensor is the centered second moment, so . Expanding the streaming terms, the factor multiplying cancels by the continuity equation:Hence the Jeans equation isIts fluid analogue is the momentum equation with pressure tensor . For isotropic random motion, , and this becomes the Euler equations for an inviscid fluid:The tensor form allows anisotropic stellar stresses. In a fluid an equation of state can provide a pressure closure; the Jeans equation alone does not determine the velocity-dispersion tensor of a collisionless stellar system.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 62 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For an isolated collisionless stellar system, define the scalar second mass moment and total kinetic energy byTake moments of the Collisionless Boltzmann equation, with vanishing surface fluxes. For any time-independent phase-space function , integration by parts givesApply this first to and then to . The result isThe potential is self-consistent Newtonian gravity, soSymmetrize the force integral under :Thus the dynamical virial theorem is . For a steady system, , and consequentlyFor bounded statistically steady motion, averaging instead gives provided . Collisionlessness alone does not imply instantaneous virial equilibrium: a collapsing system retains the term. The displayed derivation assumes a finite second mass moment, or a limiting version with vanishing boundary terms, and no confining boundary-pressure contribution.
In virial equilibrium, the total energy is . Define the kinetic temperature at fixed particle number by . Along an equilibrium sequence,This is the negative heat capacity of a virialized gravitational system: removing total energy makes the kinetic temperature rise. A collisionless stellar system need not be in thermal equilibrium, so without that additional assumption this is a kinetic-temperature interpretation of heat capacity, rather than an assertion that every stellar distribution has a thermodynamic temperature.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 59 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put , take without loss of generality, and write . The Newtonian gravitational potential is singular at the origin; all pointwise claims below concern . The zero of the Newtonian gravitational potential is the one in the paper, with an implicit fixed length unit inside the logarithm.
The Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity in cylindrical coordinates givesThe two contributions to the Laplacian areConsequently the mass density of the axisymmetric logarithmic gravitational potential isThe coefficient of is positive. The coefficient of determines the density positivity for an axisymmetric logarithmic potential: strict positivity at every noncentral point requires and . Nonnegativity permits , where the mass density vanishes on the noncentral symmetry axis. For it is negative near that axis. Either sign of a nonzero real gives the same model, and is undefined. Setting yields vacuum away from the singular origin, not strictly positive mass density. The central cusp is locally integrable and contains no hidden point mass: the Newtonian gravitational field flux through a shrinking sphere is of order its radius.
An equatorial circular orbit requires inward gravitational acceleration equal to . Thus the circular speed isThis is a flat galaxy rotation curve. The singular center does not define an additional circular orbit at .
The specific orbital energy is conserved because the Newtonian gravitational potential is time independent. The axial specific angular momentum is conserved because the Newtonian gravitational potential is axisymmetric. Hence the Jeans theorem, or directly in the Collisionless Boltzmann equation, permits a stationary two-integral galactic distribution function. Using makes this galactic distribution function even under reversal of the azimuthal velocity, so it describes a nonstreaming population. A general axisymmetric population can have an odd part in , or dependence on a third integral of motion; neither is required for this construction.
At each position define . The two-integral galactic distribution function is invariant under swapping and , since only their sum of squares occurs in . It is also even in each velocity component. Swapping integration variables proves meridional velocity isotropy of a two-integral distribution, while reflecting one variable makes each mixed integrand odd. ThereforeAll mean velocities vanish, so these are also the corresponding statements for the velocity ellipsoid and its centered covariance tensor. They do not require to equal either meridional second moment.
To normalize the proposed logarithmic-potential two-integral distribution, first separate the mass density into terms with the same spatial factors as the two exponentials:Since and , the Gaussian integral and its derivative giveThus velocity integration of the galactic distribution function yields . Matching the independent spatial factors determinesThis verifies both the stationary Collisionless Boltzmann equation and the required Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. A shift changes the normalizations to and ; the physical mass density is unchanged.
There is an important distinction between positive mass density and a nonnegative galactic distribution function. For , both coefficients above are nonnegative. For a prolate model , and one must test the sum rather than reject the model just because one term is negative. On accessible phase space,with equality in the equatorial plane at , . The nonnegativity bound for a prolate logarithmic-potential distribution is consequentlyFor larger , the displayed algebraic expression still integrates to the positive mass density, but is negative at those equatorial circular orbit phase points and is not a physical galactic distribution function. This extra restriction is distinct from the earlier density-only answer.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 59 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , , and . The Jeans equation obtained by taking the first velocity moment of the Collisionless Boltzmann equation isFor an equilibrium population multiply by and integrate. Integration by parts givesAssume the integrals exist and the boundary flux vanishes, as for an isolated finite system with adequate decay. With the stellar kinetic-energy tensor, stellar pressure-energy tensor and stellar potential-energy tensor defined bywe obtain the equilibrium tensor virial theoremThe stellar kinetic-energy tensor describes ordered motion, whereas the stellar pressure-energy tensor describes random motion. In particular, does not mean the stars have no kinetic energy. If a surface flux is retained, the right side of the displayed equilibrium identity is that surface tensor; it cannot be discarded for an arbitrary finite aperture. For an isolated self-gravitating population, is symmetric by pairwise interchange in the Newtonian interaction integral, and the time-dependent identity is with .
For the spherical Newtonian gravitational potential, . In the pressure-supported case the tensor virial theorem gives . The notation used in this question is the planar virial trace , not just the integral of the local cylindrical radial velocity dispersion. In cylindrical coordinates this trace includes both and . Summing the two Cartesian components therefore givesThe distinction explains the factor of two in the spherical limit.
Use ordinary spherical coordinates, , . The mass density separates as , whereBoth potential-energy integrals have the same radial factor . When this factor is finite and positive it cancels, leaving the scale-free tracer virial ratioThe angular factor in the printed intermediate formula has its sine and cosine interchanged. Keeping its sine/cosine weights while using that printed factor would instead produce the opposite sign in the final small-flattening correction. Merely measuring from the equatorial plane cannot fix this: the measure and both moment weights would have to change as well.
The angular ratio is finite and positive for every fixed and finite real , because is positive and bounded above and below. However, the claim that the unrestricted global virial integrals are always well-defined needs a hypothesis. In a point-mass Newtonian gravitational potential, the common radial factor is proportional to : convergence at zero requires , while convergence at infinity requires . There is no such . If the global energies diverge, the boxed angular ratio is still the ratio of the two potential-energy integrals with identical spherical inner and outer cutoffs, independent of the cutoffs. It is not a quotient of two finite global stellar pressure-energy tensors; applying a finite-aperture tensor virial theorem additionally requires its surface terms. These convergence and boundary qualifications are separate from the printed angular typo.
Set . For modest flattening, the Taylor expansion is . The required elementary angular integrals areThese follow directly by , or from the supplied Gamma function identity. Hence the numerator is and the denominator is . The flattening–anisotropy virial relation becomesFor a decreasing tracer mass density (), oblate flattening () requires more random kinetic support per in-plane direction than vertically. In a spherical Newtonian gravitational field, directional orbital anisotropy supplies the flattening rather than an anisotropic force law. A steeper radial mass density amplifies the required velocity dispersion anisotropy. A prolate tracer reverses the leading inequality. The relation constrains integrated velocity dispersions, not a unique local galactic distribution function.
