Collisionless Jeans dispersion relation Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-11-05
Linearize the Collisionless Boltzmann equation and the perturbation Poisson equation about a homogeneous velocity distribution . A plane wave gives . Integrating this density and using yields . Growing modes have and no real-velocity pole; real and damped frequencies require the causal continuation prescription. The Newtonian homogeneous background requires the Jeans swindle.
A collisionless stellar system is one for which discrete gravitational encounters change its distribution negligibly over the time under study, usually . Stars can orbit and respond collectively to a varying smooth gravitational potential even in this regime; collisionless does not mean force-free or stable against collective gravitational instabilities. Its smooth distribution follows the Collisionless Boltzmann equation.
Jeans theorem 2026-09-28
Jeans theorem states that a steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation solution depends on phase-space coordinates only through integrals of motion, and that a nonnegative function of isolating integrals gives a steady collisionless distribution function on its domain.
Linearizing the Collisionless Boltzmann equation around in an integrable background Hamiltonian gives , with . An integrating factor gives the displayed zero-initial-perturbation solution. A nonzero initial perturbation adds the freely evolving term .
Let and . Assume the one-particle distribution function and its weighted tails decay enough that all required velocity integrals converge and boundary terms at infinite velocity vanish. Multiply the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation by and integrate over velocity. In Cartesian coordinates, spatial differentiation commutes with this integration, while integration by parts gives
Consequently the three force-balance equations are
Explicitly the component is , with cyclic counterparts for . For equal stellar masses, multiplying by the common mass replaces by the mass density ; for multiple stellar masses, use a mass-weighted one-particle distribution function or derive a separate equation for each tracer population.
Define mean streaming velocity and the velocity dispersion tensor . The zeroth velocity moment of the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation gives the continuity equation . Therefore
Substituting in a yields the standard steady Jeans equations:
The unsteady version adds on the left. Defining the stellar pressure tensor makes the analogy with fluid momentum balance explicit. The off-diagonal terms are correlations between random velocity components; they need not vanish or equal the diagonal terms.
Define the unperturbed orbital angular frequency vector by
It is the rate of advance of the angle variables along the unperturbed Hamiltonian flow; the action variables are constant. Expand the Collisionless Boltzmann equation to first order in the perturbations. Since and depend only on the action variables, , and
The omitted Poisson bracket is quadratic in the perturbations. Use the Fourier series convention
For each harmonic the linear ordinary differential equation is
Multiplication by the integrating factor and use of give the causal linear response in action-angle variables:
The zero harmonic stays zero at this order. This formula retains the entire forcing history; replacing it immediately by a resonant Dirac delta function would discard the transient response.
Since , Hamilton's equations give
For the spherical unperturbed Hamiltonian, ; in these particular action-angle variables the third component describes the fixed orientation of the orbital plane. It should not be confused with the physical azimuthal angular velocity of a particle around its orbit.
The conserved normalization of a probability distribution makes the expected value of specific angular momentum equal to . Its time derivative is the torque per unit halo mass:
This follows either by averaging the single-particle equation or by integrating the Collisionless Boltzmann equation against , with vanishing boundary fluxes.
The term integrates to zero over the periodic angle variable. Thus the first nonzero torque is quadratic in the perturbation. Use the Fourier series expansions of b; the source's reference here to part (a) is a numbering slip. Integrating the product over all three angle variables yields
Reality of the potential energy per unit mass gives ; likewise . Conjugate harmonics make the total torque real. The sum is over all integer vectors, so no extra factor of two should be inserted.
Use the Collisionless Boltzmann equation in action-angle variables,
Define the orbital frequency vector by
The slow evolution of the angle average starts at second order in the perturbation. At first order, the Poisson bracket therefore gives
For the th term in the Fourier series, this reads
The lowercase here denotes the Fourier coefficient of the uppercase in the Hamiltonian; these are the same perturbing potential. Multiply by the integrating factor and set the initial homogeneous response to zero. One obtains
Retaining the slow time dependence of inside this integral is compatible with the subsequent second-order calculation; changes in caused by that slow evolution affect only higher orders in this approximation.
Let denote . Average the Collisionless Boltzmann equation to second order. All first-order angle derivatives average to zero, leaving
An angle integration by parts shows that
Thus the angle-averaged galactic distribution function obeys an action-space continuity equation,
This sign also follows from Hamilton's equations, : the flux is .
Reality gives and . Orthogonality of the Fourier series implies
Insert b to obtain
Although individual terms are complex, pairing with makes the flux real.
Now take the marginalization specified by . Assume vanishing radial-action flux at and : the first boundary does not permit negative radial action, and the second has no escaping flux in this calculation. Then
with
If radial-action boundary flux were present, its explicit boundary term would have to be retained.
Use physical momentum and conserved-background comoving momentum . At fixed , the homogeneous collisionless phase-space distribution function is , with no spatial or angular dependence and no explicit background time derivative. The printed relation cannot have this meaning: freely propagating physical momentum redshifts as , so it should read . Keeping the printed relation literally would give and a nonzero zeroth-order redshift, inconsistent with the target equation. The standard definition is positively confirmed by the phase-space convention in Ma and Bertschinger's perturbation treatment.
With this conserved , the orders of the factors are:
  • is first order; the zeroth-order collisionless equation has already made .
  • is first order, while has a zeroth-order free-streaming velocity and first-order corrections. Their product contributes at first order only through that background velocity.
  • begins at zeroth order; begins at first order. Its leading product is .
  • begins at first order, and begins at first order because background trajectories keep their direction. Their product is second order and drops out.
Thus the linear Collisionless Boltzmann equation is
For photons . For a particle of mass , . The order counting does not assume that the first-order angular deflection itself vanishes; only its multiplication by an already perturbed angular distribution makes it higher order.
Let . A comoving observer measures photon energy , so . The null condition is . Using the stated Christoffel symbols in the time geodesic equation gives
Divide by to differentiate with respect to conformal time. The background redshift term cancels when differentiating :
In the perturbation term use the background relation , giving
Without metric tensor perturbations, both and the propagation direction are constant along an unperturbed ray. Thus and are first order. Multiplying them by derivatives of , which is also first order, gives second-order terms. The term is first order and must be retained. At linear order the Collisionless Boltzmann equation therefore reads
Taking the Fourier transform in the spatial coordinates proves
A first-order correction to the propagation velocity multiplying a spatial derivative of is likewise second order.
First velocity moment. Assume a stationary, spherical, nonstreaming collisionless stellar system with constant mass-to-light ratio . Use a luminosity-weighted galactic distribution function, with luminosity density . Multiplying the Collisionless Boltzmann equation by and integrating over velocities, with its velocity-space boundary terms vanishing, gives
Spherical symmetry makes the stress tensor
Here is one tangential component, as in the paper; the total tangential variance is . Its radial divergence is , since the divergence of the radial unit vector is . With the velocity-anisotropy parameter , and enclosed mass , this gives the Spherical Jeans equation
This uses a constant ratio of total gravitating mass to luminosity, rather than an arbitrary independent dark halo.
Projection and elimination of anisotropy. Write for projected radius and for spherical radius. The Abel transform of the luminosity density gives
whose inverse is the displayed density inversion in the paper. At a point on this line of sight, . The line-of-sight second stellar velocity moment is . Therefore the measured quantity satisfies
The Spherical Jeans equation gives . Substitution yields
The inner printed in the PDF's definition of must therefore be : the literal expression has an extra gravitational factor and lacks the density. Both this derivation and dimensional consistency require the correction. Define the projected spherical Jeans residual by
To express it entirely in terms of the radial stress, put
Differentiating the nonsingular representation gives . Hence
If vanishes at zero and infinity, then . These are the absence-of-boundary-stress conditions needed for the global result.
The virial relation, term by term. Interchange the order in the residual integral and use
It follows that
The first term is : spherical averaging assigns one third of the integrated velocity-square to any fixed viewing direction, giving . The gravitational potential energy is
Thus the integrated residual is exactly , and its vanishing is the virial theorem. Solving for gives the global projected virial estimate of a mass-to-light ratio,
It is independent of the radial anisotropy profile when the full aperture and the stated boundary conditions are used. A finite aperture retains a boundary term.
Use for the gravitational parameter, to distinguish it from the Delaunay action called . The displayed actions are per unit reduced mass. Accordingly use specific canonical momenta; with physical relative momenta, all three actions acquire a common reduced-mass factor, which leaves the eccentricity fraction below unchanged.
The canonical transformation. In spherical coordinates, separation of the Kepler Hamilton-Jacobi equation gives
A local type-two generating function, continued across turning points with the appropriate momentum branches, is
The old momenta are and the new angles are , , . This defines a canonical transformation, since its generating differential is . With standard choices of angle origins, the resulting Delaunay variables are
with the mean anomaly, the argument of periapsis, and the longitude of ascending node. In particular, the signed includes retrograde orbits; the squared equation in the PDF must not be read as .
For bound noncollision Kepler orbits, the independent ranges are
The limiting circular, radial and coplanar cases sit on boundaries where some angle charts degenerate. They have zero measure in the generic phase-volume calculation. The ranges are constrained as above, rather than a Cartesian box with three unconstrained actions.
The eccentricity count. A canonical transformation preserves phase space volume, so
Integrating the three angles contributes , and integrating gives . At fixed , the condition that the orbital eccentricity be less than is . Thus
Any energy weight cancels between these integrals. If the total population is finite, or an explicit finite action band is used,
This is the Delaunay phase-volume proof of the thermal eccentricity distribution. The source's law is a cumulative count, not a differential eccentricity density. Also, pointwise finite does not alone imply finite : gives . The finite normalization of an energy-only Kepler distribution is the additional condition needed for a global probability statement; the fraction at every fixed energy is unaffected.
Why the observation does not imply relaxation or equilibrium. No Boltzmann distribution was used: every normalizable energy-only phase-space distribution function has the same eccentricity marginal, irrespective of collisional thermalization. An even stronger counterexample is a genuinely time-dependent collisionless distribution
Kepler motion has and constant actions and other angles, so : this is an exact nonstationary solution of the Collisionless Boltzmann equation. Integrating removes the cosine and leaves precisely the same cumulative count at every time. An eccentricity marginal alone cannot establish thermal relaxation, a relaxed age, or even a stationary distribution.
Express the Collisionless Boltzmann equation in variables and divide the derivative along the photon ray by . Since has no explicit position, direction or conformal-time dependence,
This is the chain rule in momentum magnitude and direction. At linear order, , while the last two terms are products of first-order perturbations and can be dropped. The synchronous photon momentum redshift from part i then gives, for spatial Fourier convention ,
The factor is essential. It is missing in the PDF's displayed intermediate equation, but follows directly from part i and is needed to obtain its final brightness equation.
Let . Absorbing the common phase-space normalization into , the homogeneous photon energy density is , so the photon brightness perturbation is
A small directional temperature change in a Planck distribution gives . Integration by parts yields
because the Planck distribution behaves as at low momentum and decays exponentially at high momentum. Thus . Equivalently, frequency-integrated blackbody radiation energy scales as . Identifying brightness with a single temperature perturbation assumes this blackbody spectral form; the brightness integral itself is defined more generally.
Finally, multiply the corrected transport equation by , integrate and divide by . The spatial streaming factor is independent of , while its gravitational source integrates to . Therefore
This derives the synchronous photon brightness equation with the normalization and sign fixed, rather than inferring it from the dimensionally inconsistent intermediate formula.
Write for the gravitational parameter of the relative Kepler orbit, and use specific orbital energy and momenta per unit reduced mass. The Hamiltonian is
If physical momenta rather than these specific momenta are used, multiply the actions by the reduced mass. This only introduces a constant factor into the phase space measure and leaves the eccentricity fractions unchanged. The formulas in the question adopt the specific-action convention.
Here is an explicit local canonical transformation. A separated complete integral of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation is
Choose branches along an orbit and take , , , . Then
whose exterior derivative proves preservation of the canonical symplectic form. Thus these variables are canonical, and the absolute Jacobian determinant is one. The angular separation gives and , including the sign of the angular momentum along the reference axis.
For clarity, the radial action can be evaluated rather than assumed. Let , with the eccentric anomaly. Then , and
In the integral, use and . The polar action is , while the signed azimuthal action is . The separated angular coordinates have the usual Delaunay variables interpretation: is the argument of periapsis, and is the longitude of ascending node. In particular,
with a suitable origin at periapsis, so is the mean anomaly. We have therefore recovered
not merely assigned names to the new coordinates.
For nondegenerate bound Kepler orbits, the ranges are
The boundaries describe circular, coplanar or radial degeneracies, where some angles cease to be defined; they have zero measure in the present calculation. The actions are canonical coordinates with nested bounds, rather than three independently unrestricted Cartesian coordinates. The square of alone would miss the distinction between prograde and retrograde inclinations.
By the canonical transformation, the population measure becomes
At fixed , the condition is . Integrating all three angles and then gives
Consequently the Delaunay phase-volume proof of the thermal eccentricity distribution yields
The PDF's dependence must be interpreted as a cumulative distribution function, not an eccentricity probability density function or the value of the original six-dimensional phase-space distribution function. A finite value of at every energy also does not suffice to make the total population finite: on all bound energies gives the divergent integral . The fractions are well defined at each fixed energy, over a finite allowed energy range, or for an energy distribution with a finite total integral.
A Boltzmann distribution is therefore unnecessary. Any normalizable energy-only distribution has the same eccentricity marginal, although such a distribution is a collisionless steady state by Jeans theorem. The marginal alone does not even prove stationarity: for ,
is a positive time-dependent solution of the Collisionless Boltzmann equation and has exactly the same eccentricity marginal after integration over . An observed cumulative law establishes neither thermal relaxation nor the age of the system or Universe.
Assume a stationary, spherical, nonrotating collisionless stellar system, a constant mass-to-light ratio , and vanishing boundary stresses at infinity. Let be the luminosity density, so , and set . Distinguish spatial radius from projected radius . The enclosed luminosity and radial force are
Here is the velocity dispersion of either one of the two tangential components; thus . If a combined tangential variance is used instead, its contribution must be divided by two in this definition.
To derive the Jeans equation, start with the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation . Multiply by and integrate over all velocities. Integration by parts in velocity, with decaying fast enough to eliminate boundary terms, gives
The same equation holds with luminosity weighting because the tracer's luminosity is conserved along its orbit. Spherical symmetry makes the local stellar velocity moment tensor diagonal, with entries , , . Its radial divergence is : the second term accounts for the changing directions of the radial and tangential unit vectors. Therefore
This is the Spherical Jeans equation; it follows from a stellar velocity moment rather than requiring a particular form of the galactic distribution function.
Integrating the luminosity density along a line of sight gives its surface brightness:
The second identity is Spherical Abel deprojection. For the second stellar velocity moment, the angle between the radial direction and the line of sight has . The line-of-sight velocity dispersion is therefore , and
From the Spherical Jeans equation, . Substitution produces
The primary PDF has a genuine symbol error in its projected gravity term: it prints a second multiplying inside the integral, where is required. The corrected projected spherical Jeans residual is
To justify the derivative at the singular-looking lower limit, write . Differentiation then gives . In particular, . If tends to zero both at zero and infinity, as for a finite isolated equilibrium with sufficiently decaying stresses,
If a boundary stress survives, its contribution must be retained; the zero-integral statement is not a finite-aperture identity.
Now identify each integral with a term in the virial theorem. Let be the total kinetic energy, including all three random components, and the gravitational potential energy. Averaging over spatial directions in a spherical system gives one third of the total stellar velocity moment along any chosen line of sight, even if the velocities are locally anisotropic. Thus
Building the spherical mass shell by shell gives
Finally, Fubini theorem and give the gravitational contribution to the residual integral explicitly:
Consequently
The global projected virial estimate of a mass-to-light ratio is independent of the velocity-anisotropy parameter under these assumptions. It does not remove the mass--anisotropy--density degeneracy for arbitrary radial mass profiles. In particular, if an independent dark matter halo makes mass fail to follow light, a single constant is no longer the physical enclosed mass-to-light ratio at every radius.
In an axisymmetric cylindrical coordinate system, the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation is
Let and . Multiply by and integrate over velocities. The spatial terms give . Integration by parts in supplies , and the derivative supplies . The force term vanishes because does not depend on . This assumes sufficient decay of the galactic distribution function to discard all velocity boundary terms. The radial Jeans equation is consequently
Reflection symmetry about makes even and odd. At the midplane the latter vanishes, and . Multiplying by proves
All quadratic velocities here are population moments, not individual stellar velocities. In particular, symmetry does not make the midplane tilt contribution to asymmetric drift disappear: an odd mixed moment can have a nonzero derivative at zero.
For application to the Milky Way, assume negligible mean radial and vertical flows, and define the circular speed by . Write and . Rearranging gives the exact stress-support relation
Thus the stellar asymmetric drift is the right-hand side divided by . For , this denominator is approximately . If and locally, the bracket becomes , making the density and dispersion-gradient contributions explicit.
A radially declining random-motion stress supplies some of the force needed to support a galactic disk, so its stars need less ordered azimuthal motion than a population on circular orbits. Hotter, often older, stellar populations therefore generally rotate more slowly than cold populations in the same gravitational potential; this is the observed stellar asymmetric drift. It is a stress-support effect, not a frictional slowing of each orbit. For a velocity ellipsoid aligned approximately with spherical coordinates, , and the midplane tilt term contributes rather than zero.
Local measurements of mean rotation and all components of the velocity dispersion, combined with tracer-density and dispersion gradients, can therefore constrain and the radial Newtonian gravitational field. A hotter sample's mean rotation must not be identified directly with the circular speed. The tracer number density need not be the gravitating mass density. Nonaxisymmetric streaming, a nonstationary disk, poorly measured radial gradients, or a neglected tilt term can bias this inference; these are assumptions of the derivation rather than extra free corrections to the circular force.
First consider a genuinely one-dimensional, time-independent collisionless stellar system with Hamiltonian . Choose . For bound vertical oscillations, a phase-mixed population has equal occupations of the upward and downward branches of each orbit. By Jeans theorem, its stationary distribution is a function of the conserved vertical energy, . Equivalently, the one-dimensional Collisionless Boltzmann equation makes constant along the energy curves. Branch-dependent incoming and outgoing populations or time-dependent waves would not satisfy this assumption.
Integrate both signs of and change variable to :
The density is thus an Abel transform of the vertical-energy distribution. To invert it without simply quoting an inversion rule, apply a second integral and exchange its order:
The inner integral is , as follows by setting . Writing before differentiating avoids an artificial infinite endpoint term. Under sufficient differentiability and decay,
The vertical-energy Abel inversion of a stellar distribution is therefore
This proves the normalization, including the factor from the two velocity signs. The additive origin of merely changes the origin of energy.
For this expression to define a physical phase-space distribution function, must be expressible as a single-valued function of , the integrals and differentiated integral must converge, and the resulting must be nonnegative. Reflection symmetry and a potential increasing with provide the usual single-valued relation on either side of the disk. A sufficiently smooth decreasing is a sufficient condition for nonnegativity; it is not asserted to be necessary for every positive energy distribution. If there is a finite escape energy, replace the infinite limits by that energy and impose the appropriate cutoff and boundary conditions. The displayed infinite-limit formula presumes either a confining potential or a distribution extended by zero above its allowed energy, with no omitted boundary population.
A three-dimensional galactic disk does not automatically meet these hypotheses. Exact separation makes an integral of motion. If the full galactic distribution function factorizes into an in-plane factor and a vertical factor , integrating the in-plane velocities gives the required one-dimensional distribution after its normalization is absorbed into . More generally the vertical marginal must depend only on in the sample being analysed. Near the solar radius, approximate separation can be useful when the sampled heights and radial excursions are small relative to the scales over which the vertical force changes with . If only a slowly varying vertical action is conserved, replacing it by one fixed requires an additional controlled local approximation.
The population must be sufficiently stationary and phase mixed, with negligible mean vertical flow, and the data must measure a well-defined tracer population with a known selection function. Radial coupling and the tilted velocity ellipsoid must be negligible or modelled. In the full vertical Jeans equation, that coupling is ; it cannot generally be discarded merely because a mixed moment vanishes at the midplane. The tracer number density is not the mass density producing the potential.
To infer the local mass, measure the tracer density as a function of height and its vertical velocity distribution near the midplane. With , the latter directly samples . Insert that measured distribution into the forward integral for , and match it to the observed to infer . Equivalently, for trial potentials compute away from the plane, apply the inversion, and require agreement with the measured velocities. Density data alone do not determine both an unknown potential and an unknown energy distribution.
Once the vertical force is known, use the full axisymmetric Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity, rather than identifying every vertical derivative with density in isolation:
At the midplane, , so
In terms of the circular-orbit Oort constants, and , the radial term equals . It vanishes for a locally flat rotation curve, not for an arbitrary rotating disk. An integrated version gives the dynamical surface density from vertical stellar motions:
Here the actual vertical acceleration is . The sign of the radial correction follows directly from the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity.
For an illustrative isothermal tracer with constant vertical velocity dispersion , take
The velocity integral gives , hence . For a locally flat rotation curve this yields
This example shows explicitly how a measured tracer scale and velocity scale constrain the gravitating density; using the tracer's own density as the mass source would instead impose an unjustified self-gravitating model.
The inferred density includes luminous and faint stars, gas and dark matter. Comparing it with an independently estimated baryonic census tests for extra gravitating mass. An excess need not be a dark disk: a dark matter halo also contributes to the local force. Conversely, agreement with the baryonic density locally does not exclude a halo at other radii or heights. Vertical disequilibrium, radial mixing, errors in selection or tracer populations, and neglected velocity tilt can mimic a mass discrepancy, so the one-dimensional equilibrium assumptions must be tested when interpreting such an inference.