Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 43 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take the connected correlation functionFor a massive phase its large-distance form is an algebraic prefactor times , defining the exponential correlation length . To specify the normalization of magnetic susceptibility, add to the energy and differentiate the mean spin. Translation invariance gives the correlation-function susceptibility sum ruleUsing the dimensionless source removes the prefactor . Below the transition, use a selected pure phase rather than a mixture of the two magnetizations, which would have a macroscopic disconnected fluctuation.
Choose a nonnegative blocking kernel normalized by . It may enforce a block average, a majority rule or a chosen rescaled coarse spin. Define the transformed weight bySumming this identity over coarse spins shows exact preservation of the partition function. The geometrical changes are and . A coordinate rescaling subsequently restores the reference cutoff if desired. The transformation is exact only if all generated operators are retained; a finite-coupling truncation is an approximation.
Define the coupling-independent term generated when byRestoring the original gives the identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy:The parameter is an accumulated additive energy per coarse site. It multiplies the identity operator and leaves normalized spin probabilities unchanged, but it must be kept when calculating the absolute free energy. It records the eliminated-mode entropy and the normalization of their statistical measure.
Use an energy-per-site convention: and , so . Partition-function invariance givesConsequently, with ,This is the additive free-energy recursion under blocking. In a dimensionless free-energy convention multiply by ; the same recursion holds. The inhomogeneous term comes from the generated identity operator, not from a change in the spin-dependent couplings alone.
The affine equation naturally applies to the unsubtracted free energy. To extract its singular part, write and choose a regular background satisfying . Subtraction then gives . This analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion is justified when the eliminated finite-shell contribution is analytic near the fixed point and admits a regular subtraction. It can fail in a resonant direction, producing additive logarithms. The simple homogeneous formulas also assume the remaining irrelevant operators are not dangerously irrelevant couplings, and that marginal operators do not produce unaccounted logarithmic corrections. Calling the quantity in the affine equation “singular” does not make vanish automatically.
Near a renormalization-group fixed point , linearize the coupling map. In scaling coordinates , write to leading order. Here is a discrete multiplier, whereas is its logarithmic scaling exponent. A relevant operator has and grows under coarse-graining; an irrelevant operator has and decays. A marginal operator needs nonlinear analysis. Tuning the relevant fields to zero places the system on the critical surface. At the fixed point the spin field is rescaled as with . Its conjugate source therefore has . This accounts for both coupling and spin rescaling; the field normalization is part of the transformation, not a change in the physical microscopic spin length.
Assume the thermal field and magnetic field are the only remaining relevant directions. The homogeneous scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena givesChoose the stopping scale with . Thenwhere is the branch for and the branch for . Nonuniversal metric factors can be absorbed into the definitions of and these functions. Correlation lengths transform as , so . Differentiating the singular free energy twice with respect to temperature gives , and hence the hyperscaling relationTwo source derivatives similarly give . A single source derivative gives the ordered-branch exponent , and setting and scaling to one gives when the corresponding magnetization branch exists. These show explicitly how the critical exponents follow from the fixed-point scaling eigenvalues.
The independent correlation derivation uses with a single crossover scaling function. For lattice spacing , the singular continuum contribution to the magnetic susceptibility isHere is the area of the unit -sphere. The final integral is finite and nonzero when , is finite and nonzero, and the tail decays exponentially. Microscopic distances contribute a regular background. With this proves the Fisher scaling relationThere is an amplitude qualification in the printed large-distance formula: its tail has the Gaussian shape and, taken literally with amplitude independent of , integrates to a term proportional to . For a nonzero anomalous exponent it must instead be matched to the critical short-distance normalization. The matching the amplitude of a massive critical correlation tail givesAt this has precisely the same overall scaling as the critical form. Thus the requested identity uses the full scaling hypothesis, or equivalently this implicit amplitude factor. The printed tail without it is consistent as written in the Gaussian case .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 43 3 4 Solution 2026-10-14
Split the Fourier modes into and the shell . The source is uniform, so it couples only to the zero mode, which belongs to the retained part. The Gaussian field theory has no couplings between the shell and retained modes. Integrating out the shell therefore contributes only a source-independent determinant to the free energy, without changing the quadratic coefficients of the retained Hamiltonian.
Restore the cutoff by and choose the field normalization . Counting the measure, derivative and field factors explicitly givesThus in the convention that preserves the kinetic normalization, the Gaussian momentum-shell scaling isThe field has engineering dimension and zero anomalous dimension. The measure Jacobian and shell determinant supply the additive constant described in Q2. A different choice of field rescaling can redistribute factors into , but must give the same physical transformed correlation length .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 43 3 5 Solution 2026-10-14
At and the model is at a Gaussian fixed point. Its connected correlation function has the power-law critical form rather than a finite exponential decay length. Approaching from , the uniform susceptibility and the correlation length both diverge. If the thermal scaling field is linear in with finite and positive, thenThe same result follows from the mass multiplier : its logarithmic thermal eigenvalue is two, so .
The determinant also shows a thermodynamic singularity. Two derivatives of the free-energy density with respect to give, up to sign and a nonzero normalization,as . Rescaling establishes the power, and the dimensionless integral is ultraviolet-convergent for . Integrating back gives a nonanalytic free-energy term proportional to after regular backgrounds are removed. This is critical behavior of the quadratic model.
There is a stability qualification: a pure Gaussian potential with is unbounded below in the uniform mode, so it does not by itself provide a stable ordered phase on the other side. The ordered-phase obstruction in a Gaussian scalar model is removed by adding a positive quartic interaction. In that interaction is relevant, so the resulting generic scalar critical point need not retain the Gaussian exponents. Thus the calculation proves the Gaussian critical singularity and , without claiming that the unmodified quadratic integral defines both phases of a physical ordered transition.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 41 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the connected correlation function . Away from criticality its large-distance envelope decays exponentially on the correlation length , often with an algebraic prefactor. At criticality diverges and a short-range scalar model instead has the power law , with anomalous dimension .
A blocking kernel assigns coarse spins to each block of side lattice spacings, with . Define the coarse Hamiltonian byThe operator basis must be sufficiently complete to include interactions generated by blocking. Summing over coarse spins preserves the partition function, while the physical lattice spacing and site count change to , . After steps they are and . Exact blocking preserves the long-distance predictions; truncating the generated interaction space introduces an approximation.
Define the dimensionless free energy per site . Preservation of gives . For one step, removing the explicitly additive constant givesThe function records the additive free-energy density generated by eliminated degrees of freedom; it is usually regular near a finite blocking step's critical point. Iteration provesThis is the additive free-energy recursion under blocking. After removing regular backgrounds, its singular part obeys homogeneous scaling.
A renormalization-group fixed point satisfies . Linearizing the map gives scaling coordinates . A relevant operator has , an irrelevant operator has , and a marginal operator has and needs nonlinear analysis. The critical surface consists of points flowing into the critical fixed point after all relevant directions are tuned. An outgoing or repulsive trajectory lies in the unstable manifold and describes perturbations that grow under coarse-graining.
With relevant thermal and magnetic coordinates , the singular free-energy density obeys . Choose to obtainHere are the positive scaling eigenvalues, and refer to the signs of . Since , the correlation-length exponent is . Two temperature derivatives of give , establishing the hyperscaling relationThe magnetization exponent similarly is . These expressions assume no additional dangerous scaling variables.
For the Gaussian field theory, decompose the field into low and high Fourier modes, integrate out , and restore the cutoff using and . The gradient coefficient remains fixed, the mass coefficient transforms as , and the uniform source as . Hence , , and the Gaussian momentum-shell scaling givesThe sign convention reverses the magnetization's sign but not these exponents. For , these are Gaussian scaling predictions, not the exponents of a generic interacting scalar critical point: the quartic interaction is relevant there. The free quadratic Hamiltonian also has no stable ordered phase at negative , so the quoted is its formal order-parameter scaling index, not a spontaneously magnetized state of the unstabilized Gaussian integral. The relevance distinction is also explained in Tong's renormalization-group lecture notes.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 41 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The ultraviolet cutoff specifies which fluctuations remain explicit. Changing it integrates out some modes; to preserve long-distance predictions, their effect must be absorbed into the mass, interactions, and other couplings. Thus bare coefficients depend on . The long-distance inverse connected correlation function has the form . After fixing the gradient normalization, the infrared mass is an inverse correlation length. With the question's unrescaled gradient coefficient, at Gaussian level, so proportionality rather than literal equality is appropriate until that normalization is chosen.
As a concrete momentum-shell renormalization group step, split into modes below and in the shell , and defineThen rescale coordinates and the field to restore the cutoff and gradient coefficient. A local derivative expansion of gives new quadratic, quartic, and higher even couplings. If the system has short-range interactions, the field varies slowly, the effective potential is analytic, and remaining fluctuations are small, retaining the leading gradient and lowest stabilizing powers and minimizing the resulting functional gives Landau-Ginzburg theory. Suppressing the omitted fluctuations is the substantive Landau approximation; it is justified sufficiently far from the narrow fluctuation region or above the appropriate upper critical dimension.
The truncated two-point function in this question is the one-particle-irreducible two-point vertex, . It is the Hessian of the Legendre effective action, not merely the connected two-point function. In perturbation theory,Here is the Gaussian propagator about the chosen reference mass, is the mass counterterm or bare-to-reference mass shift, and is the interaction self-energy, computed from proper diagrams. Fix the gradient normalization so , and choose the infrared reference mass . Then at this order. The mass renormalization condition is .
At one loop the only two-point diagram is the quartic tadpole diagram. There are choices for attaching its two external lines, leaving the other pair contracted; dividing by gives its factor . It is independent of external momentum, soThe renormalization condition therefore gives the self-consistent one-loop equationUsing inside the loop is a self-consistent resummation; replacing it by the bare mass gives the same formal first-order expansion away from infrared problems.
Subtract the equation at , where , and absorb regular temperature dependence of into the thermal coefficient. Let and . ThenFor , the integral divided by tends to a finite cutoff-dependent constant, since its small-momentum radial integrand is . Thus is proportional to , consistent with the Landau prediction. For , set : the correction instead scales as and dominates . At it is proportional to . Hence a pure linear Landau mass law without logarithmic modification is consistent only aboveFor , the massless integral itself is infrared divergent, so the subtraction already needs additional care. The sub-four-dimensional self-consistent approximation locates the breakdown of mean-field behavior; it is not an exact calculation of interacting critical exponents.
At a tricritical point the quartic coupling is tuned away and the leading stabilizing interaction is . At the Gaussian fixed point, the field has engineering dimension , so the sextic coefficient rescales as . It changes from irrelevant to relevant atThis is the sextic case of the upper critical dimension of an even scalar interaction; marginality at three dimensions allows logarithmic corrections.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 49 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
A first-order phase transition exchanges two distinct global minima of the Landau free energy. The equilibrium free energy remains continuous, but a first derivative such as the magnetization or entropy jumps. A temperature-driven transition generically has latent heat; crossing between symmetry-related ordered phases instead has a magnetization jump without requiring latent heat. A continuous phase transition has no such order-parameter jump and usually has a divergent correlation length and nonanalytic higher responses.
For , and crossing zero, minimizing gives for and for . The minima merge continuously at zero. The curvature vanishes there, so the long-distance response becomes singular.
For , put . A nonzero stationary minimum satisfies . Equality with the free energy givesThe finite separation demonstrates the first-order phase transition. Metastability occurs where a nonglobal local minimum persists; its disappearance at a spinodal point is not the equilibrium coexistence criterion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 49 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use a selected translationally invariant pure thermodynamic phase and define the connected lattice correlation functionAway from criticality its long-distance tail has an exponential factor , possibly multiplied by a power. Equivalently when this limit exists; different directions can have different lengths on an anisotropic lattice. At a thermodynamic critical point the correlation length diverges and the tail becomes algebraic. Differentiate with respect to the physical field appearing in the energy Statistical Hamiltonian. With , the correlation-function susceptibility sum rule isIn physical continuum coordinates the sum becomes . Differentiating with respect to the dimensionless source instead removes the explicit inverse-temperature factor. Below the transition, take a one-sided pure-phase limit rather than a macroscopic symmetric mixture.
A normalized blocking kernel assigns a probability or a delta constraint to a coarse configuration for each microscopic one, with . Define the blocked Boltzmann weight bySumming over proves exact equality of the partition functions. Repeated real-space renormalization group steps compose the kernels and integrate out shorter-scale variables. To retain equality one must keep all generated interactions and the field-independent constant; a finite truncation is an approximation. Long-distance observables are mapped through the corresponding coarse observables, not identified blindly with microscopic spins. In physical units,A subsequent coordinate rescaling restores the reference lattice spacing while expressing couplings in cutoff units.
Let be free energy per microscopic site. Invariance of givesThe constant transforms as . Therefore, with , the identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy givesThe second equality follows by substitution and induction. The inhomogeneous term records eliminated-mode entropy, determinants, and normalization factors, all multiplying the identity operator; it is not an interaction with the retained spins. Strictly, this can contain regular background terms. After an analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion, the genuinely singular part satisfies the homogeneous scaling equation, except for possible logarithmic resonances.
A renormalization-group fixed point satisfies . Linearize in scaling coordinates : . A relevant operator has , an irrelevant operator has , and a marginal operator has and needs nonlinear analysis. These are logarithmic scaling eigenvalues; the discrete Jacobian eigenvalues are , not . The critical surface is the stable manifold obtained by tuning all relevant coordinates to zero. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the fixed point along a relevant direction as the coarse-graining length grows. Stable and unstable manifolds become curved away from linear order.
Linear renormalization-group flows: attraction along a critical surface and repulsion in two relevant directions
. Details. The left section has , one irrelevant coordinate and a relevant thermal coordinate . Its critical surface is in that section. With two relevant variables, the full critical surface has codimension two: the second section shows repulsion in the plane at .
Assume an isolated fixed point with two relevant scaling fields, analytic changes from physical controls to , short-range isotropic scaling, no dangerously irrelevant variable in the thermodynamic scaling function, and no marginal or resonant logarithm. Let denote their scaling eigenvalues. The homogeneous singular free-energy density obeysChoose a stopping scale so the renormalized thermal field is order one. Irrelevant fields vanish at this scale. With and ,Continuous scale interpolation absorbs the immaterial integer stopping-scale convention. Nonuniversal thermal, field and free-energy metric factors can be included explicitly; the normalized functions depend only on the universality class. The and labels refer to and , which flow to different sides of the critical surface.
For clarity about the additive terms, let solve . If , its analytic coefficients areprovided the denominators do not vanish. Subtracting makes the recursion homogeneous. A vanishing denominator is a resonance and generically produces logarithms, which the simple power-law hypothesis excludes. In a convention where the regular field-dependent background has been subtracted, write and . This yields the requested formThe contain branch-dependent matching contributions; only is physically determined. The are nonsingular functions analytic through the thermodynamic critical point and represent the same regular Taylor background on the two sides, though either branch may be used to describe them. For the full free energy at nonzero field, the regular background is generally , not just . Adding an analytic identity-operator contribution proportional to provides a direct counterexample to an exact unrestricted formula; it changes no singular exponents. The printed expression is justified for the leading singular scaling form with that analytic field background removed. Confluent corrections from irrelevant fields are also omitted in this leading form.
Differentiate the singular scaling form, with one-sided derivatives in the ordered phase. It givesThe length transforms as , so . Thus the Rushbrooke scaling relation and hyperscaling relation follow by direct substitution:The same reasoning also gives . Hyperscaling relation relies on the assumptions above and can fail above an upper critical dimension because of a stabilizing dangerously irrelevant coupling.
For the universal specific-heat amplitude ratio, write at . Two temperature derivatives multiply both branches by the same dimensional and thermal metric factors. Away from logarithmic resonances and exceptional zero amplitudes, with the same heat-capacity sign convention on both sides. HenceThe functions and their matched branch constants are tied to the fixed-point theory; the constants are not independent arbitrary experimental parameters. If , this means the amplitudes of the subleading singular contribution after subtracting the analytic specific-heat background. A finite background ratio itself need not be universal.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 26 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Independent bond percolation turns a deterministic graph into a random network: each edge is open with probability , independently, and a percolation cluster is a connected component of its open subgraph. Site percolation instead randomizes vertices. On the cubic lattice the percolation probability is the order parameter and is the critical probability. A monotone coupling, using independent uniform edge labels and opening labels below , makes the growth of connectivity with transparent.
For , : self-avoiding walk counting gives , and the planar bound proved above gives an upper bound below one. Below , clusters are finite and connection probabilities decay exponentially, a percolation sharpness theorem rather than a consequence of the threshold definition alone. Above there is almost surely a unique infinite percolation cluster. At criticality, the presence of an infinite percolation cluster must be addressed for the particular model. In two dimensions there is none. The transition replaces a finite characteristic length by scale-free geometry, followed by a macroscopic connected component.
Percolation critical exponents quantify different aspects of this change. Use power-law notation for leading exponents; it may suppress amplitudes and logarithmic corrections. From the subcritical side, define the percolation susceptibility and an exponential correlation length , using a fixed norm for the one-arm rate. Above criticality the unrestricted expectation is infinite, so a finite-cluster percolation susceptibility must exclude the infinite percolation cluster. The principal observables are:
The last distribution is not the distribution seen from a uniformly chosen site: the latter is weighted by cluster size. In the scaling description this accounts for . Under the usual below-upper-critical-dimension scaling hypotheses, further scaling relations for critical exponents includeThey organize the exponents into a small number of independent quantities; they are not automatic identities following only from their definitions. A percolation cluster fractal dimension describes the mass of a large critical cluster of radius as roughly , with the scaling relation for critical exponents in this regime.
The percolation universality hypothesis is that ordinary short-range independent models in the same spatial dimension share these exponents and their continuum behavior despite differing microscopic lattices or using bonds rather than sites. The threshold itself is not universal. Long-range connections, correlations or changes of geometry can change the universality class, so the hypothesis does not include every random graph called percolation.
Two dimensions have a particularly strong geometric structure. Closed planar dual graph circuits obstruct primal open paths. The Harris-Kesten theorem fixes the square lattice bond percolation threshold at , using planar duality and crossing estimates. Self-duality alone is not a proof; uniform rectangle-crossing control is a crucial extra ingredient. The Russo-Seymour-Welsh theorem keeps critical crossing probabilities of rectangles of fixed aspect ratio bounded away from zero and one at all scales. Closed dual circuits on disjoint annular scales then rule out an infinite critical cluster and reveal why arbitrarily large finite structures persist.
Critical site percolation on the triangular lattice has rigorously established conformal invariance of planar percolation for crossing limits and an SLE description of interfaces. These results are specific to this model. The exact planar valuesare rigorously established there; its one-arm probability has exponent . In the corresponding scaling description these values give , , and . The percolation universality hypothesis predicts the same planar exponents for square lattice bond percolation, but the triangular-lattice theorem by itself does not prove that transfer. This distinction separates exact model-specific mathematics from a broader physical prediction.
Dimension changes the importance of loops and correlations between growing branches. The mean-field percolation exponents come from approximating critical clusters by branching processes. Their values are , , , , and . The predicted upper critical dimension of percolation is six. One way to see its role is the triangle diagram appearing in the percolation triangle condition: if the long-distance Fourier connectivity behaves like , its infrared contribution is proportional to . It is finite above six and logarithmically divergent at six. This motivates mean-field behavior above six and logarithmic corrections at six, without turning that heuristic into a proof for every lattice.
Lace expansion makes the mean-field picture rigorous in suitable high-dimensional regimes. For nearest-neighbor percolation, sufficiently high dimensions are covered; sufficiently spread-out models have mean-field results for every . Between two and six the exponents depend nontrivially on dimension, and exact three-dimensional values are not supplied by the planar theory. Hyperscaling relation illustrates the change: mean-field values give , while , so the naive equality fails above six. In , and no infinite percolation cluster exists for ; this is a degenerate endpoint case rather than the ordinary interior transition.
The threshold locates the transition, critical exponents describe its geometry and singularities, and the percolation universality hypothesis proposes which microscopic distinctions disappear at large scales. Planar dual graph arguments and conformal invariance of planar percolation make exceptional, while six marks the expected boundary of mean-field scaling.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 42 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Along an isolated two-phase coexistence line, two distinct stable minima have equal free energy. If this line ends at an ordinary interior endpoint without encountering another phase, the distinction between the two phases must disappear: their minima and the intervening barrier merge. For separated nondegenerate minima, their stationary values are smooth functions of the controls. The difference has . The implicit function theorem therefore continues the equation as a local coexistence curve. It cannot end while those distinct stable minima persist.
At the merger the potential satisfiesThe third-derivative condition is essential: a stationary zero-curvature point with nonzero third derivative is an inflection, not a stable equilibrium. Shifting to gives an ordinary quartic Landau free energy with two independent control directions, temperature-like and field-like. The curvature and the order-parameter discontinuity vanish, the magnetic susceptibility diverges, and the correlation length diverges. The endpoint is therefore associated with a continuous transition. This is the critical endpoint of a quartic Landau free energy mechanism.
In the symmetric quartic example, the coexistence line is . Its jump vanishes at , where . This supplies a concrete realization. The word “must” requires the stated ordinary-endpoint assumptions: a first-order line can instead meet a third phase, a multicritical point, a boundary of parameter space, or continue without a finite endpoint. A spinodal point alone is not an equilibrium critical endpoint.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 42 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A first-order phase transition has a discontinuity in a first derivative of the equilibrium free energy, such as the entropy or order parameter. It can have latent heat when the entropy jumps. A continuous phase transition has a continuously vanishing order parameter and no latent heat, with singular higher derivatives and a diverging correlation length. The LG theory compares global minima, not merely the points where a local minimum loses stability.
For the uniform quartic Landau free energythe equation of state is . At zero field the stable minimum is for , and for . Thus tuning through zero gives a continuous transition. For a fixed , varying through zero instead switches between the two ordered minima and makes jump, giving a first-order phase transition in the conjugate field.
A temperature-like first-order transition can occur at zero field when and a positive sextic term stabilizes the potential. Write . Stationarity of a nonzero phase gives , while equality with gives . Solving these two conditions yieldsThe order parameter jumps from zero to . At this pointso the competing stationary points are genuinely global minima. This phase coexistence condition differs from the spinodal points and , which mark loss or creation of local stability, not equilibrium coexistence.
If the symmetry permits a cubic term , a positive quartic coefficient does not preclude a first-order transition. For with , stationarity and coexistence give and . This is the first-order transition in a cubic-quartic Landau potential; the symmetry restriction on the expansion is therefore part of the prediction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 42 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Work in a translation-invariant pure thermodynamic phase, and write to distinguish inverse temperature from the order-parameter exponent. The connected correlation function isAway from criticality in the massive scalar order channel, it decays exponentially, possibly multiplied by an algebraic factor. An exponential correlation length is defined by when that limit exists. At a continuous transition diverges and the critical decay is algebraic. In an ordered symmetric mixture, a nondecaying contribution can remain; selecting a pure branch prevents confusing it with connected critical fluctuations.
Let and . Differentiating the partition function with the energy term gives the correlation-function susceptibility sum ruleIf the source is instead the dimensionless , the explicit inverse-temperature factor is absent. In continuum physical coordinates the lattice sum is approximately .
Choose a normalized blocking kernel such that , replacing the sum by an integral for continuous variables. A deterministic example is a product of delta functions imposing that each coarse variable equals the average of spins in a block of sites, with its field normalization included consistently. Define the effective Boltzmann weight byKernel normalization makes the blocked partition function exactly equal to the original. Its coarse-grained variables retain the long-distance observables through their defining relation to the original fields. An exact RG step generally generates all symmetry-allowed operators; keeping only a small coupling set is an approximation, not an exact closure assumption. The geometrical coarse lattice hasso its physical volume is unchanged. A subsequent coordinate rescaling may restore the numerical lattice spacing to its initial value, which is the equivalent rescaled-coordinate convention.
Here define as free energy per lattice site, . Exact partition-function invariance givesBecause multiplies the identity operator, a blocking step has , where is the generated constant per blocked site. With this impliesThe identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy includes the eliminated modes' entropy, connected vacuum terms and field-measure normalization. It cannot be discarded when calculating an absolute free energy, even though it cancels out of normalized correlation functions.
There is a useful convention behind the word “singular” in this inhomogeneous equation. After removing , still contains a regular coupling-dependent background. If and , then the genuinely nonanalytic part obeys . Thus the printed inhomogeneous representative and homogeneous singular scaling below are consistent after background subtraction. At resonances or marginal points this subtraction may leave additive or multiplicative logarithms; a strictly homogeneous pure-power form is then qualified accordingly.
A renormalization-group fixed point satisfies . Diagonalizing the linearized map gives scaling coordinates . For increasing coarse-graining length, defines a relevant operator, an irrelevant operator, and a marginal operator, whose fate needs nonlinear analysis. Here the are logarithmic scaling exponents: the eigenvalues of the discrete Jacobian matrix are , not the numbers themselves. The critical surface is the stable manifold flowing into the critical fixed point after every relevant scaling field is tuned to zero. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the fixed point along relevant directions and flows toward a different long-distance phase.
For the requested two relevant fields, take and , with . Ignoring nonsingular irrelevant corrections and choosing a total blocking scale , the homogeneous singular free-energy density obeysChoose so the renormalized thermal field is . This provesMetric factors and regular analytic redefinitions of the scaling fields only change amplitudes. Likewise , so at the correlation-length critical exponent is . Two thermal derivatives of give the heat-capacity critical exponent , proving the hyperscaling relationTwo field derivatives also give ; one field derivative gives , and using to set the blocking scale on the critical isotherm gives . These statements assume that no dangerously irrelevant coupling makes the scaling function singular as it is removed. In particular the naive hyperscaling form need not describe the quartic ordered phase above four dimensions, where its stabilizing quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant. That restriction reconciles this derivation with the mean-field exponents and Question 3.
The scaling form of the connected correlation function is in the continuum long-distance regime. For , tends to a finite nonzero constant. For , it decays exponentially with a possible algebraic prefactor; an isolated massive pole gives the familiar Ornstein--Zernike correlation function tail with a temperature-dependent amplitude. Exponential decay is the essential feature; the same critical algebraic power need not remain the exact large-distance prefactor.
Using the susceptibility sum rule and spherical integration givesFor and an ordinary exponentially decaying scaling function the integral tends to a finite constant: it converges at zero because is finite, and at infinity because of the exponential decay. Microscopic distances add a regular background. Thus , establishing the Fisher scaling relation
For a continuous field, field scaling and anomalous dimension giveThis field renormalization is additional to the canonical engineering factor . It makes . Invariance of the uniform source coupling then gives , agreeing with the susceptibility exponent above. With a convention , the fixed-point choice is ; the sign of the logarithmic derivative depends on this stated convention.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 45 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For the Gaussian critical exponents, use dimensionless statistical-action conventions, with the Boltzmann factor . If is an energy, apply the following to and absorb that smooth factor into the couplings. Choose the Fourier transform conventionReality gives . The Fourier-space statistical Hamiltonian isThe source term is not multiplied by one half. Completing the Gaussian functional integral gives and the connected Fourier-space two-point correlation functionAssume for the stable massive Gaussian field theory. In the continuum long-distance theory, the real-space correlation function is the Green kernel of . Away from its source, a radial ansatz gives, at large , . Equivalently the propagator pole is at . Thus the exponential correlation length isAt the correlation length diverges. A sharp momentum regulator itself introduces artificial oscillatory long-distance tails; this length describes the physical continuum pole or a local/smoothly regulated model on distances large compared with .
For a momentum-shell renormalization group step with , split the Fourier modes into retained modes and eliminated modes . Define as the retained field. Integrating the eliminated modes is exact for a Gaussian field theory; a uniform source acts only on the zero mode, so this integration produces a field-independent free-energy term. Rescale and set . The retained quadratic action becomesKeeping the gradient coefficient fixed requires . For , the source term is , so the complete Gaussian rescaling isThe corresponding real-space field obeys ; confusing that real-space factor with would change the source exponent incorrectly.
Let be free energy per original volume, with proportional to . Rescaled volume is , so the Gaussian free-energy scaling relation isA field-normalisation Jacobian can be included in the field-independent shell term. For any finite step on positive-mass modes, that background is analytic near . Subtract regular backgrounds and choose on the massive side. The usual homogeneous singular scaling then givesThese are Gaussian critical exponents for the stipulated Gaussian approximation. A useful check is its source-dependent contribution : gives precisely that power of .
There is a qualification to a strictly pure-power singular free energy. The Gaussian free-energy logarithm at effective dimension two in contains after subtracting analytic terms. Thus the displayed exponent assignments remain the formal power indices, but at the advertised homogeneous expression needs this additive logarithmic term. A purely quadratic theory also cannot stabilise the ordered phase or the zero-mass zero mode at nonzero ; the scaling calculation is taken from , and an ordered-phase continuation requires stabilising interactions.
At a uniaxial Lifshitz point, the quadratic kernel instead isThe vanishing coefficient of is an additional tuning that distinguishes this Lifshitz point from an ordinary critical point. Use a factorised cutoff, retain and , and integrate its complement. A rectangular or cylindrical retained region is suitable; its precise boundary is not an exponent. This is a uniaxial Lifshitz Gaussian renormalization step.
Set , , and . The momentum measure acquires . Keeping both kinetic coefficients fixed requiresTherefore the anisotropic blocking and source factors areThe anisotropic effective dimension is : one parallel coordinate contributes half the scaling weight of a perpendicular coordinate. The rescaled-volume factor is , soChoosing gives the requested Lifshitz Gaussian exponents:Again , checking the uniform-source susceptibility. The associated length powers are and . A Gaussian determinant has the analogous logarithmic exception if its effective dimension equals 2. Interactions can alter these exponents; dimensional rescaling here solves the specified Gaussian model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 45 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
In the convention implied by the printed expansion, the truncated two-point quantity is the inverse connected propagator, or one-particle-irreducible two-point vertex:It is the second functional derivative of the quantum effective action (or statistical Legendre effective action) about a translationally invariant zero-field equilibrium. The relation follows from the inverse Hessian relation for a connected two-point function. The subscript in already removes disconnected one-point products; the word “truncated” here is not a request to subtract that product a second time. Nor is a general amputated connected correlation function interchangeable with a one-particle-irreducible correlation function.
Use the zero-momentum renormalized mass in the free propagator , and split the quadratic coupling into plus a mass counterterm . The self-energy is the sum of loop 1PI insertions, excluding the separately displayed counterterm. Summing repeated insertions by Dyson resummation givesThe sign convention is that a positive tadpole shifts the inverse propagator upwards. At first order, the connected correlation function correction is , consistent with this inverse-propagator convention. A different split between the reference mass and counterterm produces the same renormalized result.
For the positive quartic interaction , the one-loop tadpole diagram has no external-momentum dependence. Its symmetry factor is : assigning the two external legs to four vertex fields gives contractions, and division by gives . With the dimensionless statistical-action convention,The physical zero-momentum condition sets , hence the one-loop mass relation isWriting the internal line with is a renormalized or self-consistent one-loop convention. Away from critical infrared singularities it differs from a bare-mass insertion only at higher perturbative order. This equation does not by itself provide exact critical exponents once loop corrections become large.
For , subtract the critical-temperature condition . Take and the regular coefficients at their critical values, absorbing smooth changes into a coefficient . Sincethe one-loop critical-mass subtraction becomesLet be the area of the unit -sphere divided by . Radial integration gives .
For , is infrared finite, so it merely renormalises the coefficient and is consistent. For , setting yieldswith a finite positive dimensionless integral. The correction is singular relative to the term , invalidating the finite-coefficient linear-mass assumption. At ,so the boundary is logarithmically marginal. For , even the subtraction using needs an infrared regulator; it cannot be used to restore a finite linear critical expansion. Thus the ordinary upper critical dimension isA fixed-coupling self-consistent one-loop formula is not the full marginal renormalization group analysis, but its logarithm already shows why an uncorrected linear power law is not generic at .
At a tricritical point, both the quadratic and quartic scaling directions must be tuned; the leading stabilising interaction is sextic. With canonical scalar-field engineering dimension , the sextic coupling has eigenvalue . It becomes marginal at , givingLower even couplings generated by coarse-graining must remain tuned. This is why using an untuned quartic tadpole to diagnose a tricritical point would give the wrong boundary. The tricritical sextic beta function supplies marginal logarithmic corrections at three dimensions.
For a general multicritical even Landau potential, assume the lower stabilising even terms have been tuned away and the first remaining one is , with and . Minimising the potential on its ordered branch givesIts curvature at the minimum is . For a finite positive gradient stiffness , the longitudinal correlation length therefore scales as . The Ginzburg criterion compares the order-parameter fluctuation averaged over a correlation volume with this squared mean-field value. Keeping momenta of order or less,Consequently the multicritical Ginzburg ratio behaves asOnly for a positive exponent do these relative fluctuations vanish on approaching the critical point. Thus the general upper critical dimension isEquivalently the interaction eigenvalue vanishes there. The cases and reproduce 4 and 3 respectively.
For , the ratio diverges and the mean-field assumptions lose self-consistency arbitrarily close to the transition. At the marginal Ginzburg criterion is scale-independent at this leading estimate, rather than tending to zero; the criterion alone does not prove a divergence or force new power indices. Marginal interactions require a renormalization group calculation and generally give logarithmic corrections, as for the quartic and sextic cases above. The boundary case is marginal, not a strict power-law divergence. This qualifies the printed wording at equality while recovering the requested upper critical dimensions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 76 1 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Write and . Substituting into part (a), without prematurely replacing by its linear part, givesTaking the expectation yields the exact mean equation within the paraxial approximation:The correlation term cannot be discarded just because : the field depends on the same random medium as . Nor can be factored exactly from the given variance alone. The printed statistics do not specify the autocorrelation function of a random field, so they do not determine a unique local closed equation for .
A useful covariance-dependent equation follows to second order in . Defineand letbe the Fresnel propagator kernel for one transverse coordinate. The Duhamel principle applied to the linear fluctuation term giveswhere . Multiply by and average. Also . Since , replacing by in terms already multiplied by preserves second-order accuracy. We obtain the weak-fluctuation memory equation for the coherent fieldThis perturbation statement is for fixed propagation intervals with sufficient covariance regularity and moment bounds. The kernel is understood as an oscillatory integral. If the field is jointly Gaussian, odd perturbative contributions vanish and the remainder can be improved under the corresponding expansion hypotheses. Joint Gaussianity itself still leaves the covariance unspecified. The term is the quadratic refractive-index shift in the coherent field; it comes from the mean of .
For the usual local answer, impose the additional Markov approximation for a random medium. Its longitudinal correlation length must be much shorter than the distance on which the envelope varies, and diffraction across that correlation distance must not resolve substantial transverse covariance variation. Away from the entry layer, replace the slowly varying factors in the memory integral by their local values and extend the longitudinal integral to infinity. Define the integrated covarianceFor an integrable real stationary covariance, is even, and is its zero-longitudinal-frequency spectral density. The conventional leading weak-index model keeps only the linear random potential ; in that model the local first-moment equation isThe factor can be checked independently in the white-noise model. If is a Brownian field with , writeConverting the Stratonovich integral to an Itô integral adds . The remaining stochastic integral has zero mean, giving the boxed equation andIf the finite-correlation model retains consistently through order , the local second-order expansion also has , adding the phase factor . This phase is computed before the white-noise idealization: squaring ideal Gaussian white noise is not the finite-variance operation .
The need for a correlation assumption can be seen without any closure argument. The stationary Gaussian random field , with a single standard normal variable , has all the printed one-point statistics. In the linear weak-index model it givesIts attenuation is quadratic in propagation distance, whereas the Markov model gives linear-distance exponential attenuation. The local attenuation equation requires the additional correlation/Markov assumption; it does not follow from statistical homogeneity and unit variance alone.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 76 2 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let the medium's autocorrelation function of a random field and power spectrum use the explicit conventionSince , only the linear term in is needed to obtain the cross-section through second order:Squaring and taking the expectation givesThis is the finite-volume formula in the Born approximation for scalar wave scattering; the zero mean of does not make its squared scattered amplitude vanish. For a jointly centered Gaussian random field, the third-order contribution is zero, so the next perturbative contribution is fourth order when that expansion is valid.
Introduce the overlap volume . Changing variables rewrites the double integral asWhen the linear dimensions of a regular scattering volume are large compared with the correlation length, and is integrable, over the significant covariance range. This gives the finite-volume random scattering spectrum resultThere are two distinct approximations here: the weak-scattering expansion in and the negligible-boundary-overlap approximation in the volume-to-correlation-scale ratio. If instead denotes the power spectrum of the index fluctuation , then and the external factor is absorbed into .
Statistical homogeneity alone allows an anisotropic spectrum, so its argument is generally the vector . If statistical isotropy is additionally assumed, depends only onThe scalar notation is valid in that isotropic case. For the alternative convention , the bulk formula is . Changing the sign of the scattering vector does not change the spectrum of a real stationary scalar field; changing the Fourier transform normalization does change the displayed factors. Both conventions have therefore been stated explicitly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 303 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use dimensionless interaction couplings in the exponent of the Boltzmann weight. In the following formulas denote the physical interaction energies divided by if that factor has not already been absorbed into the displayed Hamiltonian. This convention is required for temperature-independent numerical fixed-point coordinates.
Split the original square lattice into retained sites with even and eliminated sites with odd , where coordinates are in units of . Every nearest-neighbour bond joins to , whereas a diagonal next-nearest-neighbour bond stays within one sublattice. Denote retained Ising spins by and eliminated Ising spins by . For fixed retained Ising spins defineThe blocked Boltzmann weight in the checkerboard decimation of the square-lattice Ising model isUse the independent uniform product measure on Ising spins on to perform a cumulant expansion. Its one-spin mean vanishes, and . Consequently the first-order term, the first-order eliminated-sublattice term, and the mixed term vanish. To the requested order,Here the truncation keeps and the linear term in ; equivalently count as order . At higher orders the interaction family will generally not close.
Each eliminated site has four retained neighbours, soIts six distinct neighbour pairs comprise four corner pairs at distance and two opposite pairs at distance . A given retained diagonal pair shares two eliminated centres; a given opposite pair shares only one. Thus the generated pair couplings are for diagonal pairs and for axial pairs separated by two original spacings. The original interaction directly contributes to each retained diagonal pair. No single-spin term survives spin inversion symmetry, and no three-spin or four-spin term is present in this second cumulant. This proves closure on exactly two nonconstant interactions at the retained order.
The primitive vectors of the retained square lattice are and . Rotate the axes by degrees and rescale lengths by ; retained diagonal pairs become nearest neighbours, and the axial distance- pairs become next-nearest neighbours. With , the leading checkerboard Ising decimation recursion is thereforeThe constant part of the weight is also determined: , so the original partition function equalsto the same order in the logarithm of the weights. That normalization changes free energy but not the retained-spin interaction operators. If physical energy couplings are kept instead, at fixed the relations read and .
Two shared eliminated neighbours generate a nearest-neighbour bond; one generates a next-nearest-neighbour bond after checkerboard decimation
. Details. The fixed-point equations are and . Their only finite real solutions areThe origin is the high-temperature fixed point; its Jacobian matrix is , with both multipliers zero. The nontrivial candidate critical point is . Linearize the discrete renormalization-group transformation there:The characteristic polynomial is , givingEigenvectors may be chosen as . The positive eigenvalue greater than one is the relevant direction of a fixed point; the other is irrelevant because its magnitude is less than one. Its negative sign only alternates the sign of the perturbation between steps. For a discrete map the magnitude relative to one decides relevance, not the sign rule used for continuous beta-function eigenvalues.
Let be the relevant thermal scaling coordinate, so to first order. A correlation length measured in restored lattice units satisfies . If , then . Hence the thermal exponent from a discrete renormalization map isThis is the value predicted by the stated low-order real-space renormalization group, whose nontrivial fixed point is evaluated beyond the strictly infinitesimal-coupling limit. It is an approximation, not an exact solution of the full square-lattice Ising model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 303 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The statistical Hamiltonian in this question is already in thermal units, as indicated by without an additional . Define and . The mean field and its linear response areThese are functional derivatives of the connected generating functional; the subtraction defines the connected correlation function. In the Landau approximation, neglect loop corrections and evaluate the field integral at a stable saddle . It satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equationThis follows by varying the gradient term and integrating by parts, with periodic, decaying, or otherwise appropriate boundary conditions.
The two requested free energy functionals, following the source and Legendre conventions of the question, areIn the scalar-field source Legendre transform on the chosen stable branch, is chosen to produce , and . Thus the imposed-source Helmholtz free energy and the fixed-order-parameter Gibbs free energy have the appropriate opposite source derivatives. These names are used in the question's magnetic-ensemble convention; the defining sign relation is what fixes the calculation. At leading Landau approximation there is no fluctuation-determinant term in .
Differentiate the saddle equation with respect to . The response obeysThereforeEquivalently, the inverse Hessian relation for a connected two-point function states that is the inverse kernel of . The factor follows from twice differentiating the quartic term ; it is not . This tree-level connected response is obtained by varying the saddle. It does not require replacing the exact connected correlator by a product of the saddle values, which would incorrectly give zero.
For the requested single-momentum formula, assume a homogeneous source and a translationally invariant equilibrium phase, so and . SetThe Fourier transform with the printed positive sign sends to , while the Dirac delta function transforms to one. Hence the Ornstein--Zernike correlation function hasThe inverse convention is . For general inhomogeneous , has nonconstant coefficients and depends separately on its two positions; the displayed momentum-diagonal formula then does not follow. The preceding differential equation still holds in that case.
At zero source and for , the homogeneous saddle is for , and on either selected stable ordered branch for . Thus the Landau scalar correlation length isIn the ordered phase the negative bare quadratic coefficient is compensated by the positive curvature at the nonzero saddle. Retaining below the transition would instead give an unstable kernel and is not a physical correlation length. With the usual analytic thermal tuning , , both branches diverge as , so the correlation-length critical exponent isThe high-temperature amplitude is times the low-temperature amplitude for the same . This statement is within Landau theory; fluctuations can change critical behavior outside the mean-field regime.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 303 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Assume for stability. With equal quadratic coefficients and , the internal symmetry is the full orthogonal group . In two dimensions at positive temperature, with short-range interactions, the Mermin-Wagner theorem forbids spontaneous symmetry breaking of this continuous symmetry. Thus in both phases in the infinite system; a nonzero average order parameter does not distinguish them.
Instead measure the correlation functionThe low-temperature phase has quasi-long-range order and algebraic correlations; the high-temperature phase has a finite correlation length and exponential correlations. More precisely,A finite order parameter amplitude allows . Its long-distance Goldstone-mode effective free energy is . Restoring the Boltzmann constant and using the renormalized phase stiffness, the thermal phase fluctuations giveThe Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition separates vortex-antivortex binding from unbound vortex defects. At the boundary, the universal stiffness jump gives and . The low-temperature phase stiffness is nonzero; it vanishes at long distances in the disordered phase. The exact transition location is fluctuation dependent and cannot be obtained just by setting the bare to zero.



