Write and . Varying with fixed endpoints and then choosing proper time as parameter, for which , gives the Euler-Lagrange equation
Expanding the derivative, raising the free index with the inverse metric, and using the symmetry of gives the geodesic equation
These are the Christoffel symbols of the Levi-Civita connection.
With , the quadratic geodesic Lagrangian is
Its transverse Euler-Lagrange equations are
The longitudinal equations are
after using the difference of those same equations. In particular,
This conserved quantity also follows from the Killing vector field and the geodesic conserved quantity from a Killing vector.
Treat and as independent fields. The Lagrangian density is
The Euler-Lagrange equation for is
or
The equation from variation of is its complex conjugate.
Put , , so and . The quadratic Lagrangian is obtained by taking
The two real fluctuations form a coordinate and its canonical momentum rather than two independent modes. Their Euler-Lagrange equations combine to give
and similarly for . The ferromagnetic magnon therefore has the quadratic dispersion relation
The area element is , so
For the Lagrangian , stationarity under every compactly supported variation gives the Euler-Lagrange equation
Multiplication by expands this into
recovering part (d).
For the p-energy
the first variation in the direction is
An integration by parts therefore gives the Euler-Lagrange equation
which is the p-Laplacian equation. In the notation of the question one takes .
For , the principal coefficient matrix is
Its eigenvalue in directions orthogonal to is , while its eigenvalue parallel to is . The coefficients are away from , and the condition number there is at most . On every region where , this gives uniform ellipticity with constants depending on , , and . At all principal eigenvalues vanish, so the operator is degenerate there and is not strictly elliptic on a domain containing a critical point.
The Euler-Lagrange equation is
Time-translation invariance gives the conserved energy
Indeed, after integrating the spatial term by parts and imposing finite-energy boundary conditions,
Take upward along the straight rod. The part above height has weight , so, with tensile force positive, the internal tension is compressive:
For a small transverse displacement , the quadratic bending and gravitational energies are
The Euler-Lagrange equation for this functional is
which is exactly
Clamping at the bottom fixes displacement and slope:
At the free upper end, bending moment and transverse force vanish:
Since , the four boundary conditions are
Set . Integrating the field equation once and using the free-end shear condition gives
or, with ,
Introduce the dimensionless similarity coordinate
and write . Direct substitution reduces the equation to
This is the Bessel differential equation of order , so
The free-moment condition is . As ,
The second term has nonzero limiting derivative, so the free-end condition forces . The free-shear condition then follows from the differential equation. At the clamp, , giving
Let be the smallest positive zero of this Bessel function. The first self-buckling threshold is
or equivalently
For , let be the affine barriers from the bounded slope condition. Their constant gradients satisfy the Euler-Lagrange equation, so they minimize the autonomous convex functional for their own boundary values. The comparison principle gives
Since both barriers equal at and are -Lipschitz,
for and . The supplied boundary-to-interior criterion now gives .
Part c supplies a bounded slope condition constant . Choose . Parts a and d give a constrained minimizer with , and part b makes it a minimizer over all of .
For , the Euler-Lagrange equation is the minimal surface equation for a graph
The Lipschitz bound confines to a compact set on which is uniformly positive definite, so the equation is uniformly elliptic. Interior regularity gives first, and repeated Schauder estimates then give smoothness in the interior.
For an arbitrary smooth variation , differentiation under the integral gives
Since is compact without boundary, integration by parts turns this into
The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations therefore gives the Euler-Lagrange equation
or equivalently for the Laplace-Beltrami operator.
First integral. If has no explicit dependence, the chain rule gives
The Euler-Lagrange equation makes this zero without requiring division by . Hence the Beltrami identity is
Optical paths. By Fermat principle, a ray makes the optical path length stationary. Within the strip , its functional for a graph is
The Beltrami identity gives
For a nonvertical segment , write . Then , so
Thus the optical rays in a reciprocal-height refractive index satisfy
restricted to the part in the strip. They are arcs of circles centered on . Vertical lines are the additional solutions, obtained as a limiting case or directly from the constant horizontal optical momentum. The same curves are geodesics of the Poincaré half-plane model, whose length element is .
Horizontal displacement. Let the ray enter at , travelling to the right and downward at angle to the vertical. The refractive index is continuous at , so there is no instantaneous angular jump at entry. The tangent has ; hence . The first integral gives , or . The circle derivative then fixes .
As , the rightward ray approaches . The total limiting horizontal distance is therefore
For vertical incidence, by continuity. For a leftward ray the displacement has the opposite sign, with the same magnitude. Since increases on ,
If entry is required to have a strictly downward component, this is a supremum rather than an attained maximum. A horizontal tangent at entry gives the limiting unit-radius arc, which immediately bends downward in the medium.
Figure 1.
Light rays entering a medium with refractive index equal to reciprocal height
. Original circular-ray construction for entry at x equal to zero and y equal to one. Rays bend toward the singular lower boundary; their limiting horizontal displacements are tan of half the entry angle, bounded by one. Details.
The lower boundary is a limit, rather than a point reached in finite optical travel time. On a nonvertical circular ray, as . Thus the optical path length contains a divergent integral proportional to . The horizontal distance stays finite even though propagation toward takes infinite time.
Variational formulation. Take real with in the interval, and impose homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions, or other suitable conditions that cancel the boundary terms. The functional
has Euler-Lagrange equation
which is equivalent to . The same construction is constrained stationarity of the energy subject to , with a Lagrange multiplier. For fixed zero endpoint values, the variation vanishes at both ends; homogeneous zero-flux conditions also cancel the boundary term .
Multiplying the differential equation by and using integration by parts gives the Rayleigh quotient
For a nonzero admissible trial function, by the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle. The Rayleigh-Ritz method chooses trial functions satisfying the endpoint conditions, often with adjustable coefficients, and minimizes this quotient over that trial family. Expanding in a normalized eigenbasis shows why the lower bound holds: , a weighted average of eigenvalues no smaller than the least one.
Radial quadratic trial. The radial problem becomes
where the printed endpoint notation refers to . Thus and . At the origin the vanishing and regularity of make the boundary term vanish; the weight must be retained in both numerator and denominator.
For a quadratic , the derivative condition sets and the outer condition gives . Overall amplitude cancels in the Rayleigh quotient, so take . Then
while
Consequently
Why the estimate is higher. For a regular radial function put . Then , and direct differentiation transforms the equation to . Its first mode is , corresponding to with its continuous value at the origin. Thus . The quadratic trial is not proportional to that Spherical Bessel function, so it has nonzero components in higher modes. Its Rayleigh quotient is therefore strictly larger than , in agreement with .
General definitions. The Euler-Lagrange equation gives . Write and . A normal mode has fixed displacement pattern and common time factor, ; its normal frequency satisfies
Here is angular frequency. A normal coordinate is the coefficient of one pattern in a complete modal expansion, so these coordinates decouple the equations. Since is positive definite, the change turns the mode equation into the ordinary symmetric eigenvalue problem for .
Three-mass equations. Let be horizontal displacements from the unstretched equilibrium, ordered left to right. The kinetic energy and potential energy are
Differentiating the potential energy gives
Thus and
Frequencies and patterns. Put . Expansion of the generalized eigenvalue problem for small oscillations gives
Solving at each root gives
The zero normal mode is uniform translation. In the lower nonzero mode, the central mass stays fixed, the two end masses move oppositely, and their unequal displacements balance both the end-mass momenta and the forces on the central mass. In the upper mode the end masses move together and the centre oppositely. Both vibrating modes leave the centre of mass fixed.
Orthogonality. Because is symmetric, two mode equations imply
Distinct eigenvalues therefore give the mass-matrix orthogonality of normal modes:
The Euclidean dot product need not vanish for unequal masses; for example , while . The modal squared norms are .
Figure 1.
The three normal modes of the unequal free mass chain
. Masses from left to right are m, 2m and 3m, joined by springs k and 3k. Arrow lengths show the modal amplitude ratios (1,1,1), (-3,0,1), and (1,-2,1). Details.
Normal coordinates. Expand . Project using the mass-weighted inner product and divide by each modal norm to obtain
For example, the inverse equations are , , . They reduce the energies to
and hence
The first coordinate is the centre of mass and has free linear motion. Multiplying by respectively gives mass-normalized normal coordinates if desired.
Let be a stationary function and perturb it to , where is smooth and . These perturbations preserve the prescribed endpoint values. Differentiate the functional at :
By integration by parts,
The boundary term vanishes. The remaining integral must vanish for every such , so the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations gives the Euler-Lagrange equation
It is a necessary stationarity condition; deciding whether the stationary path is a minimum requires additional information.
Length functional. On the unit sphere, write the position vector in spherical coordinates as
Its two coordinate tangent vectors satisfy , and . Consequently the induced Riemannian metric is . On a segment for which increases and ,
Segments where is not monotone require another parameter or a subdivision. Endpoint turning points can be handled by a limit.
First integral. With , there is no explicit dependence. The Euler-Lagrange equation therefore says that
is constant. For , put and solve:
The radicand must be nonnegative along the chosen segment. The printed expression with both limits fixed at describes a longitude difference between endpoints; a formula for needs the variable upper limit and the additive constant shown here. The case gives a meridian with constant longitude. The equator is also a stationary route, although it cannot be parameterized using changing .
Integration and geometric meaning. Put , so and
For a nonconstant segment , and writing , the integral becomes
Rearranging, and absorbing phase and sign into two constants, gives
Multiplying by shows that the corresponding Cartesian coordinates satisfy . Thus every such stationary route lies in a plane through the sphere's center: it is a great circle, the geodesic of the sphere. The meridians and equator are the limiting or separately parameterized cases of the same description.
Rome to Singapore. Use exactly the approximate coordinates supplied in the question: at departure and at arrival. Inserting them into the preceding relation determines
Indeed the right side is one at Rome and zero at Singapore. This corresponds to , . In latitude , the route is : it starts at north with an initially eastward heading and then curves southward to the equator. The first-integral expression in has an integrable endpoint singularity at departure, where has a turning point; the longitude parameter is regular there.
Figure 1.
Shortest spherical route for the approximate Rome and Singapore coordinates in the question
. Latitude versus longitude for the derived great circle, with endpoints at 45 degrees north and 15 degrees east, and zero degrees north and 105 degrees east. The quarter-circle parameter increases uniformly in spherical distance. Details.
For an explicit regular arc-length parametrization, let and . Their dot product is . Hence
Both and equal one. The shorter great circle arc is the global shortest path: for any unit-speed curve from , its central angle satisfies by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, since the tangential projection of has length . Integrating gives length at least the endpoint angle , which this route attains. For a sphere of radius , the corresponding shortest distance is .
Use the equilibrium coordinates specified in the paper; their distances from the origin are one and their mutual separation is . Let be the small displacements. Each initially unstretched spring has, to first order, extension equal to the relative displacement projected along its original bond. Choose the three oriented extensions
The kinetic energy is exact in these displacement coordinates, while the potential energy needed for small oscillations is its quadratic part:
The factor in the equilibrium bond length cancels when forming the unit bond directions. Applying the Euler-Lagrange equation, or differentiating for the force on each mass, gives
The total force vanishes componentwise, as expected for three masses coupled only by internal spring forces.
Vary by with . The first variation of the functional is
The boundary term from integration by parts is zero. The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations therefore gives . For , independently vary and with zero endpoint variations; the two Euler-Lagrange equations are
For the optical path, Fermat principle makes stationary. In cylindrical coordinates its integrand is , with . There is no explicit dependence. The Beltrami identity for several dependent variables gives
The conserved quantity is the axial component of the optical momentum of a ray. As , squaring and inverting yields
Now suppose and seek a path of radius . The angle is a cyclic coordinate, so is conserved. At fixed radius this is strictly increasing in , forcing constant. The radial Euler-Lagrange equation reduces to
Consequently the helical rays in a radially graded refractive index have
A real nonzero helix exists at such a radius when , and its helical pitch is . If , the solution is instead a straight axial light ray. Thus radial dependence permits constant-radius rays for suitable profiles; an arbitrary radial profile need not support a nonzero real helix. This qualification is necessary, for example when the refractive index increases with radius.
If the integrand has no explicit dependence, differentiate along a stationary path:
The last equality uses and the Euler-Lagrange equation. This proves the Beltrami identity, the first integral .
If has no explicit dependence, the Euler-Lagrange equation becomes . Thus
The variable is then a cyclic coordinate. This is the case used for the azimuth in the ramp calculation.