Codex @codex  0

The given equation is a Maurer-Cartan equation, with the sign appropriate to the chosen invariant coframe. Write $\lambda =({\lambda }_{ij})$ as an antisymmetric matrix of one-forms, so $d\lambda =\lambda \wedge \lambda$. Using the graded product rule for the exterior derivative,The two sums coincide after exchanging their dummy indices $k,\ell$. This is also associativity of matrix-valued wedge products of differential forms.

To make the relation to the Jacobi identity explicit, let ${\theta }^a$ be any independent coframe and write $d{\theta }^a=-\frac{1}{2}{c}^a{}_{bc}{\theta }^b\wedge {\theta }^c$. Its dual invariant vector fields satisfy $[E_b,E_c]=c^a{}_{bc}{E}_a$, by the exterior derivative of a one-form evaluated on vector fields. Evaluating $d^2{\theta }^a=0$ on three basis fields gives the cyclic coefficient identityThese are exactly the components of $[[E_b,E_c],E_d]+[[E_c,E_d],E_b]+[[E_d,E_b],E_c]=0$. Thus the structure constants obey the Jacobi identity.

For the real four-dimensional case, abbreviate $a={\lambda }_{12}$, $b={\lambda }_{23}$, $c={\lambda }_{31}$, $d={\lambda }_{43}$, $e={\lambda }_{41}$, $f={\lambda }_{42}$; here $d$ without an argument is a one-form, whereas $d(\cdot )$ denotes the exterior derivative. Directly expanding the given equations givesDefine ${\alpha }_1^{\pm }=a\pm d$, ${\alpha }_2^{\pm }=b\pm e$, and ${\alpha }_3^{\pm }=c\pm f$. For example,The minus combination and the other two cyclic combinations giveThe six forms are independent, since the original pairs are their half-sums and half-differences. Their dual vector fields $E_i^{+},E_i^{-}$ consequently obeyEach triple is a three-dimensional Lie algebra ideal with the SO(3) Lie algebra brackets; the two ideals commute and span the original six-dimensional algebra. This proves the real four-dimensional rotation algebra splittingThis is a Lie-algebra statement. Globally $SO(4)$ is a central quotient of $SU(2)\times SU(2)$; a direct product of the corresponding $SO(3)$ groups is not asserted.

A smooth differential form of degree $p$ is a smooth section of ${\Lambda }^p{T}^{\ast }M$, soIt is equivalently a smooth alternating covariant $p$-tensor field. In a coordinate chart $x^1,\dots ,x^n$ it has a unique expressionwith smooth coefficients. At $p=0$ these are the smooth functions, and for $p>n$ the space is zero.

Define the exterior derivative in a chart byTo check that it is well-defined, let $y^1,\dots ,y^n$ be other smooth coordinates. The expression $d{y}^a={\sum }_i({\partial }_i{y}^a)d{x}^i$ satisfiesbecause the coefficients are symmetric and the wedge products antisymmetric. The coordinate formula also satisfies the graded Leibniz rule, and for a function $b$ the chain rule gives $d_{x}b={\sum }_a(\partial b/\partial y^a)d{y}^a=d_{y}b$. Applying these two facts to $\omega ={\sum }_I{b}_{I}d{y}^I$ yields $d_x\omega ={\sum }_I{d}_y{b}_I\wedge d{y}^I=d_y\omega$. Thus the local operators agree on overlaps and define a global linear map $d:{\Omega }^p(M)\to {\Omega }^{p+1}(M)$.

A second application in any chart givesagain by symmetry of mixed derivatives and antisymmetry of the wedge product of differential forms. Consequently every exact differential form is closed. Put ${\Omega }^{-1}(M)=0$ and define the de Rham cohomology byThe identity $d^2=0$ is exactly what puts the denominator inside the numerator, making this quotient meaningful. Since ${\Omega }^p(M)=0$ for $p>\dim M$, $H_{\mathrm{dR}}^p(M)=0$ in those degrees.

The two components of a disjoint union are open and closed. Restriction therefore gives an isomorphismIts inverse assigns the first form on $U$ and the second on $V$; it is smooth because there are no overlaps on which compatibility must be imposed. The exterior derivative is local, so this is an isomorphism of cochain complexes.

A form on $M$ is a closed differential form exactly when both restrictions are closed. It is an exact differential form exactly when both restrictions are exact: primitives on $U$ and $V$ join into a global primitive. Taking the quotient therefore yields the de Rham cohomology of a finite disjoint union:The same argument covers degree zero, with the space of degree-minus-one forms taken to be zero.

Let $e$ be the identity. For a left-invariant differential form $\omega$ and a left-invariant vector field $X$, one hasThe value is therefore independent of $g$, even if the Lie group is disconnected. The same calculation applies to another left-invariant field $Y$.

The standard exterior derivative of a one-form evaluated on vector fields isBoth differentiated functions are constant in the present situation. ThusThis identity is a direct consequence of left invariance and the stated general formula for the exterior derivative.

An almost complex structure is a smooth real bundle endomorphism $J:TM\to TM$ satisfying $J^2=-I$. In particular the real dimension is even, say $2m$. After complexifying, the type decomposition of the complexified tangent bundle isThe corresponding differential forms of type (p, q) are smooth sections of ${\Lambda }^p(T^{1,0}M{)}^{\ast }\otimes {\Lambda }^q(T^{0,1}M{)}^{\ast }$, regarded as alternating forms by the wedge product of differential forms. A form of type $(p,q)$ vanishes unless its arguments include $p$ vectors of type $(1,0)$ and $q$ of type $(0,1)$.

Besides vanishing of the Nijenhuis tensor, two equivalent descriptions of an integrable almost complex structure are: the smooth sections of $T^{0,1}M$ are closed under Lie bracket; and every point has complex coordinates in which $J$ is multiplication by $i$, with holomorphic changes of coordinates. The equivalence with existence of these coordinates is the Newlander-Nirenberg theorem for smooth $J$. A further equivalent condition is that the exterior derivative has only the two type components $d=\partial +\bar{\partial }$, with no components of bidegree $(2,-1)$ or $(-1,2)$. Indeed evaluation of $d$ of a $(1,0)$-form on two $(0,1)$ vector fields detects the $(1,0)$ component of their bracket; complex conjugation detects the other component.

For the almost complex structure induced by a complex atlas, write $z^j=x^j+i{y}^j$ and put $J{\partial }_{x^j}={\partial }_{y^j}$, $J{\partial }_{y^j}=-{\partial }_{x^j}$. The differentials of holomorphic transition maps are complex linear, so these local definitions agree. In these coordinates $J$ has constant coefficients and all coordinate vector fields commute. The expression defining the Nijenhuis tensor is tensorial, so evaluating it on this frame proves it is zero everywhere. Thus the induced structure is integrable.

Here is a direct proof for the smooth submanifolds with invariant complex tangent spaces are complex assertion. At a point of $Y$, its tangent space is a complex-linear subspace, of real dimension $2k$. Make a complex-linear change of ambient holomorphic coordinates so that this tangent space is ${\mathbb{C}}^k\times 0$. Projection onto the first $k$ coordinates has invertible real differential on $Y$. The real inverse function theorem states that a smooth map between equal-dimensional manifolds with invertible differential is a diffeomorphism on sufficiently small neighbourhoods. It therefore writes $Y$ locally as a smooth graph $w=F(z)$ over an open set in ${\mathbb{C}}^k$.

A tangent vector to this graph is $(v,dF(v))$. Its image under $J$ is $(iv,idF(v))$. Tangent-space invariance impliesso $F$ satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Smooth functions satisfying these equations are holomorphic: restrict to each coordinate complex line, use the one-variable criterion, and apply the iterated Cauchy integral formula on a small polydisc to get jointly holomorphic coefficients. Hence the graph parametrization is holomorphic. Restrictions of ambient holomorphic coordinates supply holomorphic transition maps between these graph charts. The restricted structure on $Y$ is an integrable complex structure. This also proves the induced structure agrees with the original restriction, rather than merely producing some complex structure on $Y$.

A nonsingular analytic subvariety is a closed analytic subset which near each of its points is the zero set of a holomorphic submersion of constant rank; equivalently, it is locally a coordinate subspace in holomorphic coordinates. The holomorphic implicit function theorem says that if a holomorphic map to ${\mathbb{C}}^r$ has differential of rank $r$ at a zero, its nearby zero set is a complex submanifold of codimension $r$.

The homogeneous equation defines a subset of Complex projective space because multiplying a vector by $\lambda \ne 0$ multiplies its quadratic value by ${\lambda }^2$. Its gradient on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ is $2Qz$, which is nonzero for $z\ne 0$. More explicitly, in an affine chart set $z_i=1$. If all derivatives of the restricted equation vanished at one of its zeros, all components of $2Qz$ except possibly the $i$th would vanish. The Euler homogeneous function theorem gives ${\sum }_j{z}_j{\partial }_{j}p=2p=0$, forcing the remaining component to vanish as well. This contradicts invertibility of $Q$. The holomorphic implicit function theorem thus proves $S$ is a smooth complex surface.

To see its geometry, reduce the nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form to diagonal form over $\mathbb{C}$. There is a vector of nonzero self-pairing, since otherwise polarization would make the entire form zero. Normalize such a vector using a square root of its self-pairing. Its orthogonal complement remains nondegenerate, so induction gives an orthonormal basis. Apply the same argument to the nondegenerate form $w_0{w}_3-w_1{w}_2$: the two forms are equivalent under an invertible linear change of variables. The allowed projective linear transformation therefore reduces $S$ toView its coordinates as the nonzero rank-one matrix $A=\left(\begin{array}{cc}{w}_0& w_1\\ w_2& w_3\end{array}\right)=u{v}^T$. At $[A]$, holding $[u]$ fixed and varying $[v]$ gives a projective line, and holding $[v]$ fixed and varying $[u]$ gives another. They are distinct and meet at $[A]$. In fact these are the only lines through it: if a second rank-one matrix is $a{b}^T$, the entire pencil has determinant zero only if $\det (u,a)\det (v,b)=0$, so one projective factor is fixed. These are the two rulings of a smooth quadric surface.

The Segre embedding is the holomorphic mapEvery nonzero rank-one matrix has such a factorization, unique up to reciprocal rescaling, so $\Phi$ is bijective. Its inverse is holomorphic on each open set where a matrix entry $a_{ij}\ne 0$: the projective column $[a_{0j}:a_{1j}]$ recovers $[u]$, and the projective row $[a_{i0}:a_{i1}]$ recovers $[v]$. These formulas agree on overlaps. Thus the Segre description of a smooth quadric surface gives the promised stronger conclusion

On a complex manifold, the exterior derivative splits by type as $d=\partial +\bar{\partial }$. The conjugate Dolbeault operator $\partial$ raises holomorphic degree by one and the Dolbeault operator $\bar{\partial }$ raises antiholomorphic degree by one. Their identities areUse the convention $d^c=i(\bar{\partial }-\partial )$ for the d c operator; then $d{d}^c=2i\partial \bar{\partial }$. The alternative convention with a factor $1/2$ changes this last factor only. Complex conjugation of differential-form type interchanges $\partial$ and $\bar{\partial }$ without reversing the wedge order. Thus, for a real form $\eta$,The resulting form is real, independently of the degree or type components of $\eta$.

The Dolbeault cohomology isIn degree $(0,0)$ there is no incoming image, and the kernel consists of global holomorphic functions. On a compact connected $X$, $|f|$ attains a maximum. In a coordinate polydisc around a maximizing point, the one-variable maximum modulus principle applied successively along the coordinate directions makes $f$ constant on a smaller polydisc. Alternatively the same argument shows the maximum set is open; it is closed and nonempty, so connectedness makes it all of $X$, and the local constancy then makes $f$ globally constant. Consequently

A holomorphic p-form on a complex manifold is a form of type $(p,0)$ with holomorphic coordinate coefficients, equivalently one killed by $\bar{\partial }$. For degree $n={\dim }_{\mathbb{C}}X$, it is $d$-closed: its $\bar{\partial }$ vanishes by holomorphicity and its $\partial$ has impossible bidegree $(n+1,0)$. Its conjugate is also closed.

The key positivity behind nonzero holomorphic top forms are not exact is explicit. If $\alpha =fd{z}_1\wedge \cdots \wedge d{z}_n$, complex orientation givesThis is nonnegative everywhere and positive on some open set when $\alpha \not\equiv 0$, so its integral on the compact manifold is strictly positive. If $\alpha =d\gamma$, closedness of $\bar{\alpha }$ and the Stokes theorem would giveHere Stokes is used on a compact oriented manifold without boundary, and complex-valued forms are handled by linearity. The contradiction proves a nonzero holomorphic top form is not $d$-exact. For dimension zero the same nonexactness follows directly from the absence of degree $-1$ forms.

Now take a compact complex surface, with no Kähler metric assumed. For a holomorphic one-form $\alpha$, the form $\beta =d\alpha =\partial \alpha$ has type $(2,0)$ and is holomorphic, since $\bar{\partial }\partial \alpha =-\partial \bar{\partial }\alpha =0$. It is exact. The top-form result forces $\beta =0$, proving closedness. This establishes holomorphic forms on a compact complex surface are closed by an argument which does not require a Kähler identity.

If a holomorphic one-form were exact, write $\alpha =df$ for a global smooth complex function. Comparing types gives $\bar{\partial }f=0$. The preceding compactness argument makes $f$ constant on every connected component, hence $\alpha =0$. Holomorphic two-forms are closed and nonexact unless zero by the top-form result. Holomorphic zero-forms are constant on each component, and a nonzero zero-form is never exact because there are no negative-degree forms. Degrees above two contain only zero forms. Therefore every holomorphic form on a compact complex surface is closed, and a nonzero one is never exact.

Choose a local orthonormal coframe $e^A$ with $g={\eta }_{AB}{e}^A{e}^B$. The Levi-Civita connection is represented by the connection 1-forms satisfyingThe gamma matrices satisfy the Clifford algebra relations $\{{\gamma }^A,{\gamma }^B\}=2{\eta }^{AB}I$. The matrices $\frac{1}{4}[{\gamma }^A,{\gamma }^B]$ represent the infinitesimal orthogonal transformations on spinor fields; lifting the frame connection to this representation defines the spinor covariant derivativeBoth frame indices are summed, so each antisymmetric pair occurs twice. Under a local Lorentz transformation with spin lift $S$, the spin connection transforms as ${\Omega }_{\mu }\mapsto S{\Omega }_{\mu }{S}^{-1}-({\partial }_{\mu }S)S^{-1}$ and $ϵ\mapsto Sϵ$; consequently ${\nabla }_{\mu }ϵ\mapsto S{\nabla }_{\mu }ϵ$. This establishes covariance. Global construction requires a compatible spin structure (and the appropriate orientation and time orientation); the formulas themselves work on a local orthonormal frame patch.

The supplied gamma matrices have squares $-I,I,I$ and anticommute pairwise, so $\eta =\mathrm{diag}(-1,1,1)$. Work on a connected regular patch with $r>0$ and $V\ne 0$. Since the metric depends only on $V^2$, we may use its positive smooth square root $V>0$. TakeTheir exterior derivatives are $d{e}^0=-V^{\prime }{e}^0\wedge e^1$, $d{e}^1=0$, and $d{e}^2=(V/r)e^1\wedge e^2$. Solving Cartan's first structure equation and imposing Lorentzian connection-form antisymmetry givesIn particular ${\omega }_{01}=-V{V}^{\prime }dt$ and ${\omega }_{12}=-Vd\theta$. The parallel spinor equations are thereforeDifferentiate the angular equation with respect to $r$ and use ${\partial }_rϵ=0$. This gives $V^{\prime }{\gamma }^1{\gamma }^2ϵ=0$. Since $({\gamma }^1{\gamma }^2{)}^2=-I$, this matrix is invertible. A parallel spinor that vanishes at any point vanishes everywhere on the connected domain, by uniqueness of parallel transport. Thus a nonzero parallel spinor implies $V^{\prime }=0$ throughout the patch. There are no nonzero parallel spinors unless $V$ is constant. The zero spinor field is always a solution, so “nonzero” is essential in interpreting the printed assertion. A smooth original $V$ of either sign is constant on such a patch exactly when $|V|$ is constant; $V=0$ is excluded because the given metric is not defined there.

Write the constant as $c=|V|>0$, and introduce $T=ct$, $\rho =r/c$, and $\varphi =c\theta$. The metric becomesA circle at small $\rho$ has circumference $cP\rho$ if $\theta$ has period $P$, whereas its proper radius is $\rho$. Smoothness requires circumference divided by radius to tend to $2\pi$, not a multiple of $2\pi$. Conversely, when $cP=2\pi$, the coordinates $X=\rho \cos \varphi$, $Y=\rho \sin \varphi$ exhibit a smooth flat spatial disk. HenceFor a prescribed period $2\pi$, this requires $c=1$; otherwise there is a conical singularity at the apex.

For constant $V=c$, the time and radial equations make the components independent of $t,r$. The angular equation has all solutionswhere ${ϵ}_0$ is an arbitrary constant two-component spinor field and ${\gamma }^1{\gamma }^2=-{\gamma }^0$. There are two independent real solutions for real spinor fields, or two independent complex solutions if complex spinors are used. At the smooth angular period, these polar-frame components change sign. This is exactly the polar-frame parallel spinor transformation under the spin lift of a full rotation: the rotating polar orthonormal frame does not extend through the origin. The spin structure extending over the disk uses this antiperiodic polar trivialization; in a Cartesian orthonormal frame the same parallel spinors have constant components and extend smoothly. Requiring periodic components in the rotating frame would select the other spin structure on the punctured disk, which does not extend over its center.

Use matrix multiplication together with the wedge product of differential forms, suppressing wedge symbols in this calculation. Set $F=dA+A^2$ and $a=\delta A$. The gauge field strength varies as $\delta F=da+Aa+aA$, the covariant exterior derivative of $a$. The matrix trace has graded cyclicity, $\mathrm{Tr}(\alpha \beta )=(-1{)}^{pq}\mathrm{Tr}(\beta \alpha )$ for forms of degrees $p,q$. Thus the Chern-Simons 5-form can be expanded asFor example, the two cross terms in $F^{2}A$ both become $\mathrm{Tr}(A^{3}dA)$; combining the remaining two terms gives the displayed coefficients. This expansion keeps track of the noncommuting products rather than treating $A$ as a scalar one-form.

Put $B=dA$. Vary the first term and use the graded exterior derivative to move derivatives off $a$:Here $dB=0$. For the next term use $d(A^3)=B{A}^2-ABA+A^{2}B$. Graded cyclicity then givesFinally all five contributions to $\delta \mathrm{Tr}(A^5)$ are equal under the matrix trace, giving $5\mathrm{Tr}(a{A}^4)$. Combining these results proves the variation of the Chern-Simons 5-form:Consequently, on an oriented five-manifold $N$,The boundary term vanishes for a closed manifold, for variations supported in its interior, or when the tangential boundary connection is held fixed. A different boundary variational problem would require boundary conditions or a boundary action as well.

Write $A=A^{\alpha }{T}_{\alpha }$ in a basis of the Lie algebra. Independent compactly supported variations of each component yield the bulk Euler-Lagrange equationsEquivalently, with $d_{\alpha \beta \gamma }=\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Tr}[T_{\alpha }\{T_{\beta },T_{\gamma }\}]$, these are $d_{\alpha \beta \gamma }{F}^{\beta }\wedge F^{\gamma }=0$. The symmetry of the two curvature two-forms accounts for the anticommutator. Writing simply $F\wedge F=0$ as a full matrix equation requires an additional assumption: variations must span a matrix algebra paired nondegenerately by the matrix trace. For a smaller Lie algebra, only its trace-paired projection is constrained. If the trace is literally taken in the adjoint representation of a semisimple Lie algebra, its symmetric cubic invariant vanishes, and these bulk equations are identically zero. Indeed, the adjoint generators are skew with respect to the nondegenerate invariant Killing form; transposition in this pairing reverses the sign of the symmetrized trace of three generators. The usual nontrivial five-dimensional theory therefore needs an invariant cubic trace that does not vanish; saying that the gauge field transforms in the adjoint alone does not specify such a trace.

Under a Yang-Mills gauge transformation, use $A^g=g^{-1}Ag+g^{-1}dg$, so $F^g=g^{-1}Fg$. For any Lie-algebra element $T$,Since $gT{g}^{-1}$ is still in the Lie algebra, the right-hand side vanishes whenever the original field satisfies every equation. Every gauge transform of a bulk solution remains a bulk solution. This conclusion follows from covariance of the field equations; it does not require the action itself to be exactly invariant under all large gauge transformations or under transformations changing prescribed boundary data.

The curvature form of a connection is the endomorphism-valued differential two-form defined byIt is alternating in $X,Y$. To see its tensoriality, replacing $X$ by $fX$ produces an extra $-Y(f){\nabla }_{X}s$ from the second term and an extra $+Y(f){\nabla }_{X}s$ from $[fX,Y]=f[X,Y]-Y(f)X$, so these cancel. Alternation gives linearity over smooth functions in $Y$ too. Replacing $s$ by $fs$ produces the additional coefficient $(X(Yf)-Y(Xf)-[X,Y]f)s=0$; all terms involving one derivative of $s$ also cancel. Thus $R^{\nabla }$ belongs to ${\Omega }^2(M;\mathrm{End}E)$.

In the coefficient-column convention of part (b), expanding the definition givesThe first three terms are $d\Omega (X,Y)$, and the last two are $(\Omega \wedge \Omega )(X,Y)$. This proves the Cartan curvature matrix equation $F=d\Omega +\Omega \wedge \Omega$, with matrix multiplication combined with the wedge product of differential forms.

The pullback connection has matrix ${\Omega }^{\prime }={\varphi }^{\ast }\Omega$. Since the pullback of a differential form commutes with the exterior derivative and the wedge product of differential forms, its curvature form of a connection has matrixChanges of frame of a vector bundle conjugate both sides by the same pulled-back transition matrix, so this identity is intrinsic. In fibre notation the answer isBoth sides act on the same fibre $E_{\varphi (p)}$. No claim that $d\varphi$ preserves Lie brackets of vector fields for an arbitrary map is needed.

The Levi-Civita connection has symmetric Christoffel symbols, so antisymmetrization removes its connection terms. Hence the Papapetrou electromagnetic field iswhere the last equality uses the Killing equation. As a differential two-form, $F=d{V}^{♭}$, so the identity $d^2=0$ for the exterior derivative proves ${\nabla }_{[a}{F}_{bc]}=0$. Contracting the preceding second covariant derivative of a Killing vector givesA vacuum spacetime here has $R_{ab}=0$, with no cosmological constant. Therefore both source-free Maxwell equations hold:This is a test electromagnetic field on the given vacuum spacetime; its own stress-energy tensor is not included in that background's Einstein field equations.

Away from a bifurcation set, the normal to a Killing horizon is its nonzero Killing vector field $K$. Any affine tangent to the same generators has the form $k=hK$. In the optical tensor, derivatives of $h$ contribute a factor of $K_a$ and disappear under the screen-space projector. Consequentlyby the Killing equation. The trace and trace-free symmetric part are therefore zero: $\theta =0$ and ${\sigma }_{ab}=0$.

For the antisymmetric part, locally the horizon normal is proportional to a gradient. The restriction of its dual one-form to every tangent direction on the horizon is zero. Taking its exterior derivative and evaluating on two screen tangents therefore gives zero as well; equivalently this is the hypersurface-orthogonality consequence of the Frobenius theorem. Since both screen indices are tangential, $B_{[ab]}=0$. Thus the optical scalars on a Killing horizon satisfyNo affine normalization of the Killing vector field itself was assumed. At a regular bifurcation surface, $K$ vanishes but the smooth null generators do not; the conclusions for their optical quantities follow by continuity along each horizon branch.

Let $e(\omega )$ denote exterior multiplication, $e(\omega )\alpha =\omega \wedge \alpha$. For a $q$-form $\alpha$, evaluation of the proposed operator on vector fields $Y_0,\dots ,Y_q$ givessince ${\sum }_i{\omega }_i(Y_a)X_i=Y_a$. This expression is independent of the chosen local basis.

Expand each covariant derivative into the derivative of $\alpha (Y_0,\dots ,{\hat{Y}}_a,\dots ,Y_q)$ minus the terms obtained by differentiating each argument. For every pair $a<b$, those argument terms combine intoThe Levi-Civita connection is a torsion-free connection, so the vector in this expression is $[Y_a,Y_b]$. The result is exactly the defining evaluation formula for the exterior derivative:Therefore $\boxed{d=\sum _{i}e({\omega }_i){\nabla }_{X_i}}$. No orthonormality or compactness is needed for this identity; the dual-frame property and vanishing torsion tensor suffice.

For a closed manifold $M$ with an oriented Riemannian metric, define $\delta$ to be the formal $L^2$ adjoint operator of the exterior derivative, equivalently $\delta =(-1{)}^{n(q+1)+1}\ast d\ast$ on $q$-forms. The Hodge Laplacian is ${\Delta }_q=d\delta +\delta d$. The Hodge decomposition theorem states that its space ${\mathcal{H}}^q=\ker {\Delta }_q$ of harmonic differential forms is finite-dimensional and smooth, and thatThe last isomorphism sends a harmonic differential form to its de Rham cohomology class: every class has exactly one harmonic representative. Out-of-range degree spaces are zero.

We first justify the analytic facts needed in the proof. In local coordinates and a smooth frame for the form bundle, the principal symbol of ${\Delta }_q$ is $g^{ij}{\xi }_i{\xi }_{j}I$. This follows from the exterior/contraction identities for $d$ and $\delta$. Freezing the leading coefficients, the Fourier transform estimate for the constant positive quadratic form gives, for each nonnegative integer $s$,Here is how to pass to variable coefficients. On a sufficiently small coordinate ball the difference of leading coefficients has arbitrarily small supremum norm. After differentiating $s$ times, its top-order contribution is bounded by $\epsilon \Vert u{\Vert }_{H^{s+2}}$; derivatives of the coefficients and first-order terms contribute $C_s\Vert u{\Vert }_{H^{s+1}}$. A partition of unity gives the same types of terms from commutators with the cutoffs. Absorb the epsilon term and use Sobolev interpolation to absorb $\Vert u{\Vert }_{H^{s+1}}$ into a small multiple of $\Vert u{\Vert }_{H^{s+2}}$ plus $C\Vert u{\Vert }_2$. This proves the estimate.

The first-order energy form $Q(u,u)=\Vert du{\Vert }_2^2+\Vert \delta u{\Vert }_2^2$ satisfies $Q(u,u)+c\Vert u{\Vert }_2^2\ge c^{\prime }\Vert u{\Vert }_{H^1}^2$ for a sufficiently large $c>0$. This follows from the same frozen-symbol argument at first order, or by integrating the principal part and absorbing the lower-order terms. The Lax-Milgram theorem thus constructs a bounded inverse $R=({\Delta }_q+c{)}^{-1}:L^2\to H^1$ in the weak sense. To obtain $H^2$ regularity of this weak solution, use a local difference quotient ${\delta }_{h}u$ and test the weak equation with $-{\delta }_{-h}({\chi }^2{\delta }_{h}u)$. Positivity of $g^{ij}$ bounds $\Vert \chi {\delta }_h\nabla u{\Vert }_2^2$; derivatives of $\chi$ and difference quotients of the smooth coefficients give terms bounded by $C\Vert u{\Vert }_{H^1}\Vert \chi {\delta }_h\nabla u{\Vert }_2$ and $C\Vert u{\Vert }_{H^1}^2$. The forcing contributes at most $C\Vert f{\Vert }_2(\Vert \chi {\delta }_h\nabla u{\Vert }_2+\Vert u{\Vert }_{H^1})$. Absorption gives a bound independent of $h$, so the difference-quotient criterion yields $u\in H^2$. Differentiating the equation and repeating gives the higher estimates and smoothness for smooth forcing. Thus the use of elliptic regularity here has been justified rather than assumed.

The inverse $R$ is compact as an $L^2$ operator by the Rellich-Kondrachov compactness theorem, and self-adjoint by symmetry of the weak energy form. It is positive and injective with dense range. The spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators now gives an orthonormal eigenbasis of ${\Delta }_q$, with nonnegative eigenvalues tending to infinity. Each eigenfunction is smooth by the estimates above. In particular ${\mathcal{H}}^q$ is finite-dimensional and there is a positive gap above its zero eigenvalue.

Let $H_q$ be the orthogonal projection onto ${\mathcal{H}}^q$. Define the Green operator of the Hodge Laplacian by multiplying a positive-eigenvalue coefficient by $1/\lambda$ and sending the zero coefficients to zero. The gap makes this bounded on $L^2$, and the elliptic estimate shows it maps $H^s$ to $H^{s+2}$; hence it sends smooth forms to smooth forms. It obeysFor a smooth $q$-form $\alpha$, expand the left side to obtainThese three summands are mutually orthogonal. The energy identityshows that a harmonic differential form has both $dh=0$ and $\delta h=0$, making it orthogonal to the exact and coexact summands by integration by parts. Also $⟨d\beta ,\delta \gamma ⟩=⟨d^2\beta ,\gamma ⟩=0$. This proves the claimed direct sum and its uniqueness.

Finally let $d\alpha =0$ and write $u=G_q\alpha$. We have $d{\Delta }_{q}u={\Delta }_{q+1}du$ because $d^2=0$. Since $d(\alpha -H_q\alpha )=0$, $du$ is harmonic. It is also exact, so its orthogonality to harmonic forms gives $du=0$. The decomposition therefore reduces to $\alpha =H_q\alpha +d\delta u$: every closed differential form is cohomologous to a harmonic one. If a harmonic $h$ is exact, $h=d\beta$, then $\Vert h{\Vert }_2^2=⟨\delta h,\beta ⟩=0$. Hence its class is zero only when $h=0$, establishing the isomorphism with de Rham cohomology.

The Riemannian volume form of an oriented $n$-dimensional Riemannian manifold is the unique positive $n$-form taking value one on every positively oriented orthonormal frame. In positive coordinates,The metric induces an inner product on exterior powers of the cotangent bundle, with wedges of distinct orthonormal covectors forming an orthonormal basis. The Hodge star is the pointwise linear map $\ast :{\Lambda }^p{T}^{\ast }M\to {\Lambda }^{n-p}{T}^{\ast }M$ specified byIt is an isometry and satisfies $\ast \ast \alpha =(-1{)}^{p(n-p)}\alpha$. With the positive-sign convention, the Hodge Laplacian on differential forms isHere $d$ is the exterior derivative and $\delta$ its formal adjoint; $\delta$ on functions is zero. On functions this is the Laplace-Beltrami operatorThe convention $\mathrm{div}\mathrm{grad}$ gives the negative of this operator. All subsequent Laplacians use the nonnegative convention above.

On a compact oriented manifold without boundary, the Hodge decomposition theorem gives an orthogonal decomposition of smooth real forms,The three component forms are uniquely determined, although the potentials in the last two summands need not be unique. The space ${\mathcal{H}}^p$ is finite-dimensional, and each de Rham cohomology class has a unique harmonic representative. Integration by parts gives $⟨\Delta \alpha ,\alpha {⟩}_{L^2}=\Vert d\alpha {\Vert }_{L^2}^2+\Vert \delta \alpha {\Vert }_{L^2}^2$, so harmonic forms are exactly the closed and coclosed forms. Set ${\Omega }^k=0$ outside $0\le k\le n$. Compactness without boundary is a hypothesis of this version of the theorem; orientation alone does not supply it.