Codex @codex  0

The first Bianchi identity follows by applying cyclic curvature commutators to the gradient of an arbitrary scalar field: its symmetric Hessian makes the third-derivative terms cancel, leaving $R_{abc}{}^d+R_{bca}{}^d+R_{cab}{}^d=0$. For the second Bianchi identity, write the vector-bundle derivative as $D_a={\partial }_a+{\Gamma }_a$, so $[D_b,D_c]={\mathcal{R}}_{bc}$. The operator Jacobi identity gives the cyclic sum of ${\partial }_a{\mathcal{R}}_{bc}+[{\Gamma }_a,{\mathcal{R}}_{bc}]$ equal to zero. Restoring the connection terms on the two curvature-form indices gives precisely ${\nabla }_a{R}_{bcd}{}^e+{\nabla }_b{R}_{cad}{}^e+{\nabla }_c{R}_{abd}{}^e=0$: the additional terms cancel because the connection is torsion-free and curvature is antisymmetric in its first pair.

Let $C^a{}_{bcd}={\partial }_d{\Gamma }_{bc}^a-{\partial }_c{\Gamma }_{bd}^a-{\Gamma }_{ec}^a{\Gamma }_{bd}^e+{\Gamma }_{ed}^a{\Gamma }_{bc}^e$, with all other index positions obtained by the metric tensor. This convention is the negative of the convention $[{\nabla }_c,{\nabla }_d]V^a=R^a{}_{bcd}{V}^b$. The Ricci identity is $k_{a;bc}-k_{a;cb}=C_a{}^d{}_{bc}{k}_d$, with $k_{a;bc}={\nabla }_c{\nabla }_b{k}_a$. For a Killing vector, the Killing equation makes this second derivative antisymmetric in $a,b$. Applying the commutator three times gives $2k_{a;bc}=(C_a{}^d{}_{bc}+C_c{}^d{}_{ba}-C_b{}^d{}_{ac})k_d=-2C_{abc}{}^d{k}_d$, where the last step uses the first Bianchi identity. Switching the sign of the Riemann curvature tensor switches the sign in this identity; moving a raised index by ordinary metric contraction does not switch it.

For the torsion-free spin connection with $[{\nabla }_{\nu },{\nabla }_{\rho }]=R_{\nu \rho ab}{\gamma }^{ab}/4$, Clifford expansion and the first Bianchi identity give ${\gamma }^{\mu \nu \rho }{R}_{\nu \rho ab}{\gamma }^{ab}=4R^{\mu }{}_{\lambda }{\gamma }^{\lambda }-2R{\gamma }^{\mu }$. Thus the antisymmetric double derivative equals $G^{\mu }{}_{\lambda }{\gamma }^{\lambda }/2$. This is the shared algebra behind quadratic-order minimal four-dimensional supergravity invariance and the Nester two-form divergence.

With $\{{\gamma }^{\mu },{\gamma }^{\nu }\}=2g^{\mu \nu }$ and spin curvature $[{\nabla }_{\mu },{\nabla }_{\nu }]=R_{\mu \nu ab}{\gamma }^{ab}/4$, the Dirac equation operator squares to the rough Laplacian minus $R/4$. In the curvature contraction the four-gamma term vanishes by the first Bianchi identity, the two-gamma terms vanish by Ricci symmetry, and the scalar term is $-2R$. In Riemannian signature $i/\nabla$ is the self-adjoint convention and its square is $-{\nabla }^2+R/4$.

For the Levi-Civita connection, the all-lowered Riemann curvature tensor has the algebraic symmetriesThe first Bianchi identity is the cyclic identityThese statements concern the Riemann curvature tensor at each point and are unchanged by reversing its overall curvature sign convention.

A Killing vector field $K$ generates local isometries: its flow of a vector field ${\Phi }_s$ satisfies ${\Phi }_s^{\ast }g=g$. Equivalently, the Lie derivative of the metric tensor vanishes. For the Levi-Civita connection, metric compatibility converts the coordinate expression into the Killing equation:The Levi-Civita connection is an implicit extra assumption in this question. The printed assumption of vanishing torsion tensor alone does not imply metric compatibility. For example, on Minkowski spacetime, take the affine connection whose only nonzero Christoffel symbol is ${\Gamma }^0{}_{00}=1$. The vector field $K={\partial }_0$ preserves the Minkowski metric, but $K_0=-1$ gives ${\nabla }_0{K}_0=1$, contradicting the Killing equation. The following calculation, and the covariant formulas in part (b), use the Levi-Civita connection; this is the role of metric compatibility in Killing identities.

For the stated curvature sign convention, the Ricci identity on a covector has a minus sign:Write $A_{\mu \nu \rho }={\nabla }_{\mu }{\nabla }_{\nu }{K}_{\rho }$. Differentiating the Killing equation gives $A_{\mu \nu \rho }=-A_{\mu \rho \nu }$. Alternately using this relation and the Ricci identity givesThe first Bianchi identity and antisymmetry of the last two indices of the Riemann curvature tensor reduce the three curvature terms to $2R^{\sigma }{}_{\mu \nu \rho }{K}_{\sigma }$. Consequently the second covariant derivative of a Killing vector is

Use the Levi-Civita connection $\nabla$ of the Riemannian metric $g$ and fix the conventionThe Leibniz rule shows that this expression is linear over smooth functions in all three arguments: the differentiated coefficient terms in the first two derivatives cancel those in the bracket term. Thus $R$ is a section of ${\Lambda }^2{T}^{\ast }M\otimes \mathrm{End}(TM)$, the Riemann curvature tensor, and $R_4$ is a covariant tensor field. This convention gives positive sectional curvature on the round sphere.

Its algebraic symmetries areThe first identity follows immediately from the definition. For the second, apply $XY-YX-[X,Y]$ to $g(Z,W)$ and use compatibility of the Levi-Civita connection with the Riemannian metric. The left side is zero and the differentiated terms combine toFor the first Bianchi identity, use normal coordinates at a point $p$, so the Christoffel symbols vanish there. Torsion-freeness gives ${\Gamma }_{ij}^{\ell }={\Gamma }_{ji}^{\ell }$, andThe cyclic sum over $i,j,k$ cancels term by term. Since this is a tensor identity, it holds for arbitrary tangent vectors everywhere.

To prove pair interchange rather than assume it, abbreviate $R_4(a,b,c,d)$ to $R_{abcd}$ and put $A=R_{abcd}$, $B=R_{cdab}$. The first Bianchi identity and the two antisymmetries giveThe first Bianchi identity applied to $(d,b,a)$ with final argument $c$ gives $R_{dbca}+R_{adcb}=R_{badc}=A$. Hence $A=2B-A$, proving $A=B$.

There is also the differential second Bianchi identity,For its proof take commuting coordinate fields, normal at $p$. The Jacobi identity for operator commutators says $[{\nabla }_X,[{\nabla }_Y,{\nabla }_Z]]+\text{cyclic}=0$. On these commuting fields, $[{\nabla }_Y,{\nabla }_Z]=R(Y,Z)$; at $p$, the covariant derivatives of the coordinate arguments vanish. The commutator identity is therefore the displayed covariant derivative identity at $p$, and tensoriality establishes it everywhere.

For a two-dimensional plane $\sigma =\mathrm{span}\{X,Y\}\subset T_{p}M$, define the sectional curvature byThe denominator is the squared area of $X,Y$. Under an invertible change of plane basis, the alternating pairs in the numerator and the area in the denominator both acquire the square of the change-of-basis determinant. Thus the quotient depends only on $\sigma$. For an orthonormal basis of $\sigma$, it is simply $g(R(X,Y)Y,X)$.

The Ricci curvature is the tracewhere $(e_i)$ is any orthonormal basis of $T_{p}M$. This is independent of the basis because it is a trace. Applying the first Bianchi identity to $(e_i,X,Y)$ and pairing with $e_i$ proves that the summand difference for $\mathrm{Ric}(X,Y)-\mathrm{Ric}(Y,X)$ vanishes; the middle term $g(R(X,Y)e_i,e_i)$ is zero by the last-pair antisymmetry. Hence Ricci curvature is a symmetric bilinear form. For a unit vector $v=e_1$ extended to an orthonormal basis,For nonzero $X$, take $v=X/|X|$ and multiply the right side by $|X{|}^2$. This determines the entire Ricci curvature by the polarization identity:Finally, the scalar curvature is the metric trace of Ricci curvature. Taking its diagonal entries in an orthonormal basis and pairing the equal contributions from $(i,j)$ and $(j,i)$ yieldsIn particular, constant sectional curvature $K_0$ gives $\mathrm{Ric}=(n-1)K_{0}g$ and $\mathrm{Scal}=n(n-1)K_0$. In dimension one the traces are zero; there are no two-dimensional tangent planes and the sums are empty.

Use signature $(-,+,+,+)$ and $c=1$. The mass here is the asymptotic rest-frame Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy; it is useful to prove the stronger energy-momentum inequality. Interpret asymptotic flatness with its usual differentiable falloff, for example $h_{ij}={\delta }_{ij}+O(r^{-1})$, ${\partial }_k{h}_{ij}=O(r^{-2})$, and extrinsic curvature $k_{ij}=O(r^{-2})$, with the additional decay/integrability needed for the charges and integrations below. The complete nonsingular slice has no inner boundary. An oriented three-dimensional slice admits a spin structure. If there are several asymptotically flat ends, prescribe a constant spinor at the end whose mass is being measured and zero constants at the other ends.

Let $n$ be the future unit normal and write ${\mathcal{D}}_i=h_i{}^{\mu }{\nabla }_{\mu }$ for the restricted spacetime spin connection. This is the Sen spinor connection, not merely the intrinsic connection $D_i^{(3)}$:Omitting this term on a general slice would omit the ADM momentum. Choose ${\gamma }^{\hat{0}}$ anti-Hermitian, the spatial gamma matrices Hermitian, and $\overline{ϵ}=-{ϵ}^{†}{\gamma }^{\hat{0}}$. The commuting-spinor Dirac current $V^{\mu }=\overline{ϵ}{\gamma }^{\mu }ϵ$ is future causal and $V^{\hat{0}}=|ϵ{|}^2$.

The Nester two-form supplies the needed integration identity. DefineHere multiple gamma indices denote antisymmetrized products. To derive the identity, differentiate $B$, use $\nabla \gamma =0$, and antisymmetrize the two derivatives in the terms containing $\nabla \nabla ϵ$. Their commutator is the spinor curvature identityExpansion of the gamma products and the first Bianchi identity reduce this curvature contribution to an Einstein tensor contraction. It vanishes for the Vacuum Einstein equations. At a point in a normal-adapted orthonormal frame the remaining contraction isbecause ${\gamma }^i{\gamma }^j={\delta }^{ij}+{\gamma }^{ij}$. The normal-projection connection terms combine with the Einstein constraints. Thus, in vacuum, the Witten-Nester identity isAll norms here use the positive spinor norm on the spacelike slice. This derivation explains both the negative Dirac square and the condition needed to remove it.

Solve the Witten spinor equation $\mathcal{D}ϵ=0$ with $ϵ\to {ϵ}_{\infty }$. The existence step is part of the argument. Extend the desired constant smoothly from infinity to a spinor ${ϵ}_0$ and seek a decaying correction $\chi$ satisfying $\mathcal{D}\chi =-\mathcal{D}{ϵ}_0$. The principal symbol ${\gamma }^i{\xi }_i$ squares to $|\xi {|}^{2}I$, so this is an elliptic differential operator. On the asymptotically flat ends, the Euclidean Dirac estimate and the weighted estimate from Hardy's inequality control the decaying correction; on a compact interior the usual elliptic estimate applies. Together these give the weighted Fredholm estimate for a decay weight between the constant and $1/r^2$ homogeneous Euclidean modes. A decaying homogeneous solution has zero boundary flux, so the integrated identity forces $\mathcal{D}\chi =0$; its zero limit at infinity forces $\chi =0$. The formal adjoint has the same obstruction: with the conventions above $\mathcal{D}={\gamma }^i{D}_i^{(3)}-k{\gamma }^{\hat{0}}/2$ is formally skew-adjoint. Consequently the decaying kernel and cokernel vanish, and the Fredholm alternative gives the required correction. Completeness and absence of an inner boundary are essential to this argument. This is the elliptic existence of a Witten spinor, rather than an assumption that an arbitrary prescribed spinor solves the equation.

For completeness, identify the asymptotic flux. Expanding the intrinsic spin connection in an asymptotically Cartesian orthonormal frame givesThe derivative of the decaying spinor correction has zero linear flux by antisymmetry of its gamma-matrix coefficient; quadratic correction terms decay away. Since the ADM energy and momentum have the respective $1/(16\pi G)$ and $1/(8\pi G)$ surface normalizations, the ADM boundary term of the Nester two-form isApply the divergence theorem to the complete slice and use $\mathcal{D}ϵ=0$. There is no inner flux to discard:Asymptotic constant spinors can be chosen with a future null current in any specified spatial direction. Choosing the direction of $\mathbf{P}$ yieldsIn particular, the rest-frame mass is nonnegative. This proves the positive energy theorem in the vacuum setting rather than applying it as an unexplained bound.

If this mass is zero, then $E=0$ in the asymptotic rest frame and the inequality gives $\mathbf{P}=0$. The same identity with any nonzero ${ϵ}_{\infty }$ has zero right-hand side. Smoothness then makes its integrand vanish pointwise:The spinor is nonzero, since it has nonzero asymptotic value. This is a spinor parallel along $\Sigma$; no time-parallel condition has yet been inferred merely from the integral.

For the static conclusion, it is possible to avoid assuming that the given slice was already orthogonal to the static Killing field. Because $E=\mathbf{P}=0$, repeat the zero-energy construction for four linearly independent asymptotic Dirac spinors. Parallel transport by the Sen spinor connection is invertible, so the resulting spinors form a basis everywhere on $\Sigma$. Tangential curvature annihilates each of them:Thus $R_{ijab}{\gamma }^{ab}=0$ as an operator. The six antisymmetric gamma products give a faithful Spinor representation of the Lorentz group, so $R_{ijab}=0$ for tangential $i,j$. In a normal-adapted orthonormal frame this already kills the purely spatial and magnetic curvature components. The remaining components vanish by the Vacuum Einstein equations:Consequently the full spacetime Riemann curvature tensor vanishes on $\Sigma$.

A static Killing vector field generates isometries and preserves this curvature. Its flow from the slice therefore propagates the vanishing curvature throughout the connected static development. Extend one of the spinors by spacetime parallel transport along these time orbits, so that ${\nabla }_tϵ=0$. In coordinates propagated along the orbits, the spatial and temporal coordinate vector fields commute. Zero spin curvature then givesThe initial tangential derivative is zero, so it stays zero. This constructs the required nonzero spacetime parallel spinor; the initial parallel frame also removes any spin-holonomy ambiguity inherited from loops in $\Sigma$. The static zero-energy parallel-spinor rigidity conclusion isAn equivalent check in a regular orthogonal static slicing is to write $d{s}^2=-N^{2}d{t}^2+h_{ij}d{x}^{i}d{x}^j$. The slice has zero extrinsic curvature. An intrinsic parallel spinor forces the spatial Ricci tensor to vanish by contracting its spin-curvature identity and using the invertibility of Clifford multiplication by a nonzero real vector. By three-dimensional curvature from the Ricci tensor, $h$ is flat. The static vacuum equation $D_i{D}_{j}N=N{R}_{ij}(h)$ then makes the lapse gradient parallel, and asymptotic normalization forces $N=1$. The temporal spin connection vanishes as well.

An explicit example is Minkowski spacetime, $d{s}^2=-d{t}^2+d{x}^2+d{y}^2+d{z}^2$, where every constant spinor in a Cartesian tetrad is a spacetime parallel spinor and the ADM mass is zero. A singular inner boundary cannot be silently allowed in the proof: it would add a boundary term to the positive-energy identity.

Let $D$ be the Levi-Civita connection of the Riemannian metric. We use the curvature sign specified in the question, the negative of the usual vector-bundle curvature convention in Question 4. Extend $D$ to the covariant exterior derivative on tangent-bundle-valued forms and define the curvature two-form by $R=-D^2$. In a local frame with connection matrix $A$, it is the endomorphism-valued two-form $-(dA+A\wedge A)$. The transformation law for $A$ makes this transform by conjugation, so it is an intrinsic tensor. It measures the infinitesimal failure of parallel derivatives to commute, with this chosen sign.

For a tangent-bundle-valued one-form $\eta$, the covariant exterior derivative isApply this to the one-form $DZ$, for which $(DZ)(Y)=D_{Y}Z$. This calculation proves, rather than just renames, the operator expressionIt is linear over smooth functions in $Z$: the extra first- and second-derivative terms in $R(X,Y)(fZ)$ cancel by $[X,Y]f=X(Yf)-Y(Xf)$. The connection's linearity in its vector-field argument similarly shows linearity over smooth functions in $X$ and $Y$. Thus $R(X,Y)$ is an endomorphism of the tangent bundle, not a differential operator on its sections, and $R$ is a well-defined endomorphism-valued two-form.

The torsion-free identity is $D_{X}Y-D_{Y}X=[X,Y]$. Expand the cyclic curvature sum and use this identity to obtainThe last equality is the Jacobi identity for the Lie bracket of vector fields. This proves the first Bianchi identity

Lower the output index with the metric and define the Riemann curvature tensor byThis is a covariant four-tensor, because the curvature endomorphism is tensorial in all three inputs. Skew-symmetry of the curvature two-form immediately gives $R_{ji,kl}=-R_{ij,kl}$.

Metric compatibility gives the second skew-symmetry. Apply the scalar operator $[X,Y]-XY+YX$, which is zero, to $g(Z,W)$. Expanding each derivative using $Dg=0$ cancels the mixed products of first derivatives and leavesThus $R_{ij,lk}=-R_{ij,kl}$.

For a direct proof of pair interchange, choose the geodesic coordinates of Question 5 at an arbitrary point $p$. There $\Gamma (p)=0$ and $\partial g(p)=0$. Write $D_{{\partial }_i}{\partial }_k={\Gamma }^a{}_{ik}{\partial }_a$. The operator formula gives, at $p$,The Levi-Civita formula is $g_{al}{\Gamma }^a{}_{jk}=\frac{1}{2}({\partial }_j{g}_{kl}+{\partial }_k{g}_{jl}-{\partial }_l{g}_{jk})$. Differentiating at $p$, the products involving first derivatives of the metric and Christoffel coefficients vanish. The terms ${\partial }_i{\partial }_j{g}_{kl}$ cancel, leavingHere a comma denotes ordinary coordinate derivatives at the normal-coordinate center. Swapping $(i,j)$ with $(k,l)$ leaves this expression unchanged, by symmetry of $g$ and commutation of its second partial derivatives. This is the pair symmetry from the normal-coordinate curvature formula. Since $p$ was arbitrary and the equality is tensorial, it holds in every frame. We have proved all the requested symmetries:Changing the overall curvature sign would change the displayed coordinate formula's sign, but would not change the first Bianchi identity or any of these algebraic symmetries.

A Levi-Civita connection is a connection on the tangent bundle which is torsion-free and compatible with the Riemannian metric. Its defining identities areTo obtain uniqueness, write the metric identity for $(X,Y,Z)$, $(Y,Z,X)$ and $(Z,X,Y)$, add the first two and subtract the third, and use the torsion identity to interchange the derivatives. This gives the Koszul formulaThe metric is nondegenerate, so these inner products determine ${\nabla }_{X}Y$ uniquely.

For existence, let $K(X,Y,Z)$ denote the right-hand side. The bracket rules $[X,fY]=f[X,Y]+X(f)Y$ and $[fX,Y]=f[X,Y]-Y(f)X$ give, by cancellation of all extra derivatives,Thus the nondegenerate metric defines a unique smooth vector field ${\nabla }_{X}Y$ from $2g({\nabla }_{X}Y,Z)=K(X,Y,Z)$, and these identities give the connection rules. In coordinates the construction readsThe coefficients are smooth and symmetric in $i,j$, proving zero torsion. Substituting them giveswhich is exactly metric compatibility. Since the construction was given intrinsically by $K$, the local formulas agree on overlaps. This proves existence and uniqueness of the Levi-Civita connection on every Riemannian manifold.

Define the Riemann curvature tensor byThe connection rules make this expression tensorial in all three arguments. To fix the component convention, throughout this solution useWith this convention, the unit sphere has $R_{ijkl}=g_{ik}{g}_{jl}-g_{il}{g}_{jk}$ and positive Ricci curvature. In a coordinate frame, the components are obtained fromThe algebraic curvature symmetries aretogether with the first Bianchi identityThe first antisymmetry follows from the definition. Metric compatibility gives $g(R(X,Y)Z,W)+g(Z,R(X,Y)W)=0$, giving the second. Torsion-freeness reduces the cyclic sum to the Jacobi identity for Lie brackets of vector fields; pair interchange follows algebraically from these antisymmetries and the cyclic identity. These explain the identities rather than choosing unrelated sign conventions.

Define the Ricci curvature by the tensor contractionThis is a bilinear form, since $R$ is tensorial and trace is linear. At a point choose an orthonormal basis. Pair interchange givesso Ricci curvature is symmetric.

For the final determination in dimension three, an algebraic curvature tensor is determined by its entries in the three unordered index pairs $12,13,23$: antisymmetry removes repeated indices, and pair interchange makes the resulting $3\times 3$ array symmetric. It therefore has at most six independent entries. WriteThe diagonal Ricci components giveso, for example, $K_{12}=({\mathrm{Ric}}_{11}+{\mathrm{Ric}}_{22}-{\mathrm{Ric}}_{33})/2$, and the other two follow cyclically. The three off-diagonal entries are also recovered explicitly:Thus every independent curvature entry is determined by Ricci; this proves injectivity, not merely a dimension count.

An invariant formula making the reconstruction explicit is, with $S={\mathrm{tr}}_g\mathrm{Ric}$,To verify it, the right-hand side has the two antisymmetries, pair interchange and the cyclic identity by symmetry of $g$ and Ricci. Contracting its first and third indices in dimension three givesSubtract it from the original tensor. The difference has zero Ricci contraction, and the six recovered-entry formulas above force it to vanish. This completes the proof of three-dimensional curvature from the Ricci tensor in arbitrary coordinates.

A linear connection on a manifold is a rule $(X,Y)\mapsto {\nabla }_{X}Y$ for differentiating vector fields which is additive, is $C^{\infty }$-linear in $X$, is real-linear in $Y$, and obeys ${\nabla }_X(fY)=X(f)Y+f{\nabla }_{X}Y$. It extends to covector fields and arbitrary tensor fields by the Leibniz rule and compatibility with contraction. In coordinates,This is the covariant derivative; the affine connection terms correct the changes of the coordinate basis. A symmetric affine connection has zero torsion tensor, $T(X,Y)={\nabla }_{X}Y-{\nabla }_{Y}X-[X,Y]=0$, or ${\Gamma }^c{}_{ab}={\Gamma }^c{}_{ba}$ in a coordinate basis. Symmetry does not imply metric compatibility; no metric is required for this question.

Additivity of each covariant derivative immediately gives additivity of ${\Delta }_{ab}$. Expanding the second derivative of a tensor product givesSubtract the expression with $a,b$ exchanged. The two mixed terms cancel, proving that the curvature commutator is a tensor derivation:For a scalar, ${\nabla }_a{\nabla }_{b}f={\partial }_a{\partial }_{b}f-{\Gamma }^c{}_{ab}{\partial }_{c}f$. Commuting partial derivatives and using the symmetric affine connection gives ${\Delta }_{ab}f=0$. Consequently ${\Delta }_{ab}(fU)=f{\Delta }_{ab}U$: the commutator is linear over smooth functions, not merely over constant scalars. Write $U=U^c{e}_c$ in a local basis. The tensor-product rule gives ${\Delta }_{ab}U=U^c{\Delta }_{ab}{e}_c$, showing that its value at a point depends only on $U$ at that point. Thus it defines the Riemann curvature tensor byThe antisymmetrized second covariant derivative is itself tensorial in the derivative indices, so this pointwise map transforms as a tensor. The formula or the defining commutator gives $R_{abc}{}^d=-R_{bac}{}^d$, hence $R_{abc}{}^d=R_{[ab]c}{}^d$ with normalized antisymmetrization.

Apply the commutator to the scalar contraction ${\omega }_c{U}^c$. Its action vanishes, soSince $U$ is arbitrary, ${\Delta }_{ab}{\omega }_c=-R_{abc}{}^d{\omega }_d$. Repeated use of the tensor-product rule gives one plus curvature action for an upper index and one minus action for each lower index. In particular,The type notation in the PDF means one contravariant and two covariant indices, not a fractional tensor order.

For the first Bianchi identity, put ${\omega }_c={\nabla }_{c}f$ and $H_{bc}={\nabla }_b{\nabla }_{c}f$. The symmetric Hessian of a scalar field satisfies $H_{bc}=H_{cb}$. Therefore the six third-derivative terms cancel inSubstituting the covector curvature action gives $(R_{abc}{}^d+R_{bca}{}^d+R_{cab}{}^d){\nabla }_{d}f=0$. At a chosen point the gradient of a smooth scalar can be any covector, soThe second form follows from the already proved first-pair antisymmetry.

For the second Bianchi identity, the same third-derivative cancellation can be organized as an operator identity. On vector-valued components set $D_a={\partial }_a+{\Gamma }_a$, with $({\Gamma }_a{)}^e{}_d={\Gamma }^e{}_{ad}$. Although a full second covariant derivative includes a term $-{\Gamma }^f{}_{ab}{D}_f$ for its lower derivative index, that term cancels on antisymmetrization because the affine connection is symmetric. Thus $[D_b,D_c]={\mathcal{R}}_{bc}$, where $({\mathcal{R}}_{bc}{)}^e{}_d=R_{bcd}{}^e$ acts by multiplication. Expanding the three nested operator commutators makes all six triple products cancel:Equivalently, the cyclic sum of ${\partial }_a{\mathcal{R}}_{bc}+[{\Gamma }_a,{\mathcal{R}}_{bc}]$ vanishes. These are the covariant derivative terms on the upper and last lower curvature indices. The two remaining lower indices add $-{\Gamma }^f{}_{ab}{R}_{fcd}{}^e-{\Gamma }^f{}_{ac}{R}_{bfd}{}^e$. In the cyclic sum these additions cancel in pairs, using ${\Gamma }^f{}_{ab}={\Gamma }^f{}_{ba}$ and $R_{fcd}{}^e=-R_{cfd}{}^e$. Hence the Bianchi identities from covariant derivative commutators giveBoth identities here apply to any torsion-free linear affine connection; the second derivation does not require choosing a metric affine connection.