For with a standard normal distribution and , split the Gaussian integral at zero and complete the square to obtain , where is the standard normal distribution function. This converts a bound on an absolute Gaussian random variable into a two-sided Gaussian tail bound using Markov inequality.
In the normal linear model, assume is independent of . Independent rows of with multivariate normal distribution give a simple random design for Debiased Lasso. Let , and , with fixed positive noise scale. Choose the Lasso penalty and all Nodewise Lasso penalties as sufficiently large constant multiples of , including the noise scale in the former. Uniform sample cross-correlations are bounded by this scale, so zero is the nodewise solution with probability tending to one. Column squared norms divided by converge uniformly to one. To check the Compatibility condition for the Lasso directly, put and . On the Lasso cone condition, , and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives
For , entrywise concentration of a Gaussian Gram matrix gives with probability tending to one for sufficiently large fixed . The stated sparsity condition implies on this event, so one can take eventually. The conditional Gaussian tail bound for the noise score and the Basic inequality for the Lasso then give with probability tending to one. Consequently the debiased-Lasso remainder bound is at most with probability tending to one, for a fixed constant . These assumptions allow both and to grow, for example , .
Gaussian maximum 2026-10-06
For independent standard normal random variables , the maximum of has scale . A union bound and the Gaussian tail bound give the upper scale. Integrating the normal density over gives a lower tail bound , implying .
First prove the strong law for Brownian motion, with probability one. For each , the Gaussian tail bound gives
By stationary increments and the Brownian reflection principle, followed by the same tail bound,
Both bounds are summable in . The First Borel-Cantelli lemma therefore implies that, eventually, both quantities inside these probability events are at most . For this gives . Intersect over a sequence of positive rational tending to zero to obtain the asserted continuous-time limit.
On this one almost sure event,
so for and to for . For each real , the path is eventually strictly on the corresponding side of . Hence
The same event works simultaneously for all levels , giving the requested transience of Brownian motion with drift.
Put , the uniform bound on the supremum norm of the gradient. The fundamental theorem of calculus on a line segment, together with the inner product inequality , gives
Thus is Lipschitz continuous with respect to the L1 norm. The Gaussian random variables comprising and have finite exponential moments of their absolute values. More explicitly, for , Hölder's inequality gives . Consequently and every exponential expression below are finite, including when the covariance matrix is singular.
Use the convex function . Since is an independent copy of , Jensen inequality for the conditional expectation gives
For , define the Gaussian rotation of independent copies
Writing , both rotated covariance matrices are and their cross-covariance is zero. The pair has a centered multivariate normal distribution, so its components are independent and has the same probability law as . This calculation uses no inverse of and therefore also proves the assertion for degenerate multivariate normal distributions.
The path runs from to . The chain rule and the fundamental theorem of calculus give the pathwise identity
Apply Jensen inequality to the uniform probability measure on . Then use Tonelli theorem and the Gaussian rotation of independent copies to obtain
This proves the Gaussian rotation interpolation inequality in the required form:
The stated almost-sure domination now gives an exponential moment of an absolute standard normal variable bound. If , completing the square in the standard normal density yields
where is the standard normal distribution function. Hence Markov inequality gives, for every ,
The exponent is minimized at . Therefore the resulting Gaussian tail bound is
No independence of from or is needed: only the given almost-sure domination is used.
Itô formula gives
so is a positive local martingale. On every finite interval , the hypotheses imply
The Gaussian tail bound of the Brownian maximum has finite exponential moments of every subquadratic power. Therefore Novikov condition holds on , and the stochastic exponential is a true martingale there. Since was arbitrary, is a true martingale.
Because , each coordinate of is . The Gaussian tail bound and a union bound give
On the complementary score event, the standard Basic inequality for the Lasso, cone argument, and compatibility oracle inequality give, for ,
Using part b and proves
with the required probability.
For any , the exponential Markov bound and part (b) give
The minimum occurs at , so the Gaussian tail bound is