For a normalized wavefunction, the expectation value of a function of position isprovided the integral exists. For an unnormalized state, divide this expression by . Put . The ground state has probability density , which is even. ThusThe zero mean position expresses symmetry, whereas this positive expectation value measures the mean distance from the centre.
Write . Repeated application of the annihilation operator lowers the energy eigenvalue in steps of . The lower bound from part (ii) forces this process to stop. To see why it also quantizes the starting energy, writeThe first lowering steps have positive squared norms. If , the next step is also nonzero by part (ii), and its energy would be , contradicting the bound. Thus , andExistence of the ground state can also be checked directly in the position representation. The equation iswhose solution is proportional to . This Gaussian function is square-integrable, so it gives an actual ground state. Its normalization can be chosen using the Gaussian integral.
All the displayed levels occur: for a nonzero state at ,Thus repeated raising creates a nonzero energy eigenstate at every .
From and the commutator product rule,Consequently, if ,Thus the creation operator raises the energy eigenvalue by , and the annihilation operator lowers it by , provided the resulting vector is nonzero. The zero vector is not an eigenstate; in particular the ground state will be annihilated by . The displayed operator identity holds even in that case.
Let have energy and put . The lowering norm formula gives, inductively,In particular is a nonzero ground state. By the assumed nondegeneracy, it equals for some .
It remains to show that raising this vector recovers , rather than merely another state at the same energy. On an energy eigenstate at , factorization gives . Iterating the factorization down the ladder yieldsApplying to therefore provesFor this is the original ground-state assumption. This proves nondegeneracy propagated by an oscillator ladder: every energy eigenspace is one-dimensional if the ground state is nondegenerate.
Twice applying the creation operator or twice applying the annihilation operator changes the energy eigenvalue by , unless they give zero. The same orthogonality argument as in part (i) therefore givesAlso the factorization in part (a) givesNow and . Squaring in the correct operator order yieldsBy part (i), the means are zero, so these are the variances. Taking positive square roots gives the requested standard deviations:These harmonic-oscillator number-state second moments also show equal mean kinetic energy and potential energy, each . Their uncertainty product is , so the ground state saturates the Heisenberg uncertainty relation.
The smallest energy eigenvalue in part (iii) occurs at the smallest possible principal quantum number, . Since , this forces and . Therefore , andFor the spherically symmetric ground state, the full three-dimensional wavefunction normalization uses . Integrating over the solid angle givesPut and use the supplied factorial integral:Thus . Choosing the positive global phase convention givesThis is the radial normalization of the hydrogen ground state convention in which the angular factor is absorbed into the spherically symmetric function. If instead one writes with the normalized spherical harmonic , then . Both conventions describe the same normalized three-dimensional quantum state.
On a smooth wavefunction , the position operator and momentum operator giveThus the canonical commutation relation is . Since and are self-adjoint operators and are real, the adjoint operator of isExpanding the products in the stated order is essential:Subtracting gives . These identities initially hold on smooth rapidly decaying functions, which contain the quantum harmonic oscillator energy eigenstates used below.
The factorization also proves a lower bound: for a normalized energy eigenstate ,Therefore . The commutator product rule, applied to , givesSo a nonzero application of the creation operator raises the energy eigenvalue by , while the annihilation operator lowers it by the same amount.
Begin with any energy eigenstate, whose existence is assumed. Repeated lowering must terminate: otherwise it would eventually produce a nonzero energy eigenstate below , contradicting the lower bound. More explicitly, if with integer and , the first lowering steps are nonzero. If , one further step is also nonzero by its positive squared norm and has energy , an impossibility. Thus and the last state satisfies . This provesEvery level exists as well: , so repeated raising from never vanishes. The same factorization bounds the energy expectation of any normalized state in the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator form domain below by , proving that the terminated state really is a ground state.
To find its probability density, solve the first-order equationIts solutions are . With , the supplied Gaussian integral givesTaking fixes an irrelevant global phase. ConsequentlyThe ground-state energy is positive even though the potential minimum is zero: it is the oscillator's zero-point energy.
Since , applying the Hamiltonian operator givesThus the energy eigenvalues and corresponding full stationary states areThe ground state is with energy zero and quantum degeneracy one. For each , the positive energy level has quantum degeneracy two: its energy eigenspace is . This is the free particle spectrum on a circle.
The ground state is the single energy eigenstate . Its coefficient in the normalized wavefunction is , so the Born rule givesThis probability is independent of because unitary time evolution changes only the dynamical phases of the energy eigenstates.
A stationary state has . Substitution into the Schrödinger equation gives the energy eigenvalue equationThe trial wavefunction satisfies it with . The periodic boundary condition requires , hence , . The wavefunction normalization is , so a convenient common global phase gives the orthonormal basisIndeed, . This is the free particle spectrum on a circle. The ground state has energy zero and is nondegenerate. Each positive energy level , , has energy eigenspace and quantum degeneracy two. Real sine and cosine combinations give another basis of the same energy eigenspace.
An energy measurement selects the ground state with probability equal to the squared inner product with . Using and integration by parts,ThusThe full Fourier sine series has , so , an independent wavefunction normalization check. However for every , hence diverges. This explicitly verifies the infinite-energy expectation qualification in part (b), without invalidating the individual projection probabilities.
The two probabilities concern different quantum measurements, so there is no requirement that they match or that one bound the other. The spatial interval contains little of the state: its probability density is smallest near zero and increases towards . By contrast, the positive ground state extends across the whole well. It has substantial same-sign overlap with the positive linear wavefunction, with no cancellation between lobes in the overlap integral. The right panel of the figure in solution illustrates these two amplitudes and marks the small position interval.
Consequently a large global ground-state probability can coexist with a small probability of finding the particle in the left third. This is not because the ground state is spatially confined to that third; a ground-state particle can be found throughout the well. In operator language the two events are projections onto a spatial subspace and onto one energy eigenstate, respectively.
Applying the Hamiltonian operator to gives , and thereforeThe ground state has zero kinetic energy. Every positive energy level is of quantum degeneracy two, because and correspond to opposite angular momenta with equal squared magnitude.
The confinement scale suggests a tangential momentum scale and thus an excitation energy scale , consistent with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. More precisely the de Broglie wavelength must fit an integer number of times around the circumference: , so . This explains both the dependence and the sequence.
One must not infer a nonzero ground-state energy by applying naively. Angle is periodic and is not a globally canonical position operator on the circle. The uniform wavefunction, with , is a concrete counterexample to that naive inequality. The ordinary Cartesian Heisenberg uncertainty principle is not violated by the zero-angular momentum state.
The t-J model approximates the low-energy sector of a repulsive Hubbard model with near one electron per site. Large on-site repulsion suppresses double occupancy. Virtual hopping out of and back into that low-energy sector produces antiferromagnetic superexchange with . One conventional effective Hamiltonian iswith projected electron operator . At half filling, nearest-neighbor hopping cannot move an electron without entering a forbidden doubly occupied state, leaving the leading spin-exchange model. Doped holes can move and couple the charge dynamics to these spin correlations. Additional terms, including three-site processes at order , are omitted in this simplified Hamiltonian.
The exchange term energetically favors a nearest-neighbor spin singlet. With in the no-double-occupancy subspace, . A square-lattice pairing ansatz can therefore use bond singlets with opposite signs along the two axes. This d-wave bond order hasIt changes sign under a quarter-turn and vanishes along the zone diagonals. It is an even-parity, spin-singlet pairing pattern, not a statement of triplet pairing or necessarily broken time reversal. Phase-sensitive interference experiments distinguish this sign structure from a merely anisotropic nonnegative gap in cuprate superconductors.[ref]
Pairing symmetry and flux quantization in a tricrystal superconducting ring by C. C. Tsuei and others. 1994 phase-sensitive tricrystal test
The model captures strong local repulsion, antiferromagnetism and mobile doped carriers. Its interacting phase diagram is not solved by writing down the Hamiltonian: a mean-field d-wave ansatz is a proposed approximation, not a proof that every parameter choice has that exact ground state or a complete microscopic explanation of every high-temperature superconductor.
Past exam of the theoretical physics I course of the University of Cambridge 2019 3 b Solution 2026-10-18
Treat independently in the Legendre transform in mechanics. Their canonical momenta areThe time-derivative terms cancel in , giving the Hamiltonian densityThe first-order time dependence makes the momenta constrained; this direct calculation still gives the canonical density. In physical terms this is the grand-canonical Hamiltonian of a Bose field, . The physical energy density is obtained by adding back. A stationary field in this chemical-potential frame has the usual factor in the physical frame.
Complete the square:For uniform or periodic boundary conditions, or in the homogeneous bulk, both nonconstant terms are nonnegative and vanish simultaneously atThe ground states form a circle. A particular nonzero is changed by every nontrivial phase rotation, although the full family is invariant. Selecting one such mean-field theory state therefore exhibits spontaneous symmetry breaking of . This describes phase selection in the thermodynamic limit; an exact finite-system particle-number eigenstate need not itself have a nonzero field expectation.
Past exam of the theoretical physics I course of the University of Cambridge 2019 3 d Solution 2026-10-18
For independent , the derivatives needed in the Euler-Lagrange field equation areConsequently the two conjugate field equations areWrite with real components, and put . Separating real and imaginary parts givesFor each real field take the real part of a complex plane wave amplitude, . With the two equations becomeA nonzero normal mode requires their determinant to vanish, soThe positive-frequency Bogoliubov quasiparticle dispersion is thereforeThere is also the negative-frequency conjugate solution, as required for real component fields. Since , , consistent with the stability of the chosen uniform ground state.
The half-line square-root potential well is confining for , which is assumed here. The hard wall imposes and the smooth turning point is . With , the WKB action becomesThe hard-wall and soft-turning-point WKB quantization condition therefore givesThe coefficient here denotes the potential strength, not the integration limit in the generic quantization formula.
The WKB approximation is reliable in the interior where , but fails near the soft turning point where ; a connection formula supplies its phase. The hard wall also requires its boundary condition, and makes the local slow-variation condition fail sufficiently close to zero. Higher-energy states have a larger action relative to , with smaller relative endpoint regions, so the leading WKB spectrum is generally more reliable at large than for the ground state.
Put , which has units of energy. In the original oscillator basis,Write , , and . The transformed number and pair terms obeyHence the coefficient of is , which vanishes for
This cancels the requested pair terms but does not diagonalize the printed Hamiltonian. Its number-conserving coupling also transforms:After the pair cancellation, the last creation terms have coefficient , nonzero for . They create two quanta from the vacuum, so that vacuum is not an eigenstate of the literal Hamiltonian. This is an inconsistency in the ground-state assertion used by the next part, present in the printed PDF.
For the actual coordinate-coupled system, the normal coordinates and their conjugate momenta diagonalize into independent oscillators withA normalizable ground state requires . Eliminating just the two indicated cross-pair terms is not sufficient to establish that ground state.