Codex @codex  0

In an orthonormal basis of localized atomic orbitals, a ring of three equivalent sites with real hopping $t$ has Hamiltonian $H=(E_0-t)I+tJ$, where $J$ is the three-by-three all-ones matrix. The normalized symmetric state $(|1⟩+|2⟩+|3⟩)/\sqrt{3}$ has energy $E_0+2t$. Its two-dimensional orthogonal complement has energy $E_0-t$. Thus the symmetric state is the unique spatial ground state for $t<0$, with an energy difference $3|t|$ to the excited eigenstates. Equivalently, the three discrete Bloch states have energies $E_0+2t\cos (2\pi l/3)$, $l=0,\pm 1$. Nonorthogonal atomic orbitals instead require a generalized eigenvalue problem.

The weighted strain density in Ornstein-Uhlenbeck multiplicative amplification evolves under ${\mathcal{L}}_{n}p=(\kappa /2)p^{\prime \prime }+{\tau }^{-1}(\sigma p{)}^{\prime }+n\sigma p$. Setting $p=e^{-{\sigma }^2/(2\kappa \tau )}\psi$ eliminates its first derivative. Shifting and scaling to $x=(\sigma -\kappa n{\tau }^2)/\sqrt{\kappa \tau }$ gives ${\psi }_{xx}+[1+\kappa n^2{\tau }^3-2\gamma \tau -x^2]\psi =0$. The quantum harmonic oscillator levels yield the displayed eigenvalues. Its ground state is the dominant positive mode; higher sign-changing modes may occur in a transient expansion.

An effective low-energy lattice model obtained from a strongly repulsive Hubbard model near one electron per site. The retained Hilbert space excludes double occupancy. Its usual nearest-neighbor Hamiltonian has projected hopping $-t{\sum }_{⟨ij⟩,\sigma }({\tilde{c}}_{i\sigma }^{†}{\tilde{c}}_{j\sigma }+h.c.)$ and antiferromagnetic superexchange $J{\sum }_{⟨ij⟩}({\mathbf{S}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{S}}_j-n_i{n}_j/4)$. Virtual intermediate states with one double occupancy cost energy $U$, giving $J=4t^2/U$ to leading order. Three-site hopping terms of the same expansion order are omitted in this simplified version.

At half filling the projected hopping is blocked. Doped holes restore charge motion coupled to spin correlations. Nearest-neighbor singlet pairing can support a d-wave bond order ansatz on a square lattice, but the Hamiltonian alone is not a proof of a unique superconducting ground state for all parameters.

An internal qubit uses two distinguishable electronic or hyperfine structure quantum states, denoted $|g⟩,|e⟩$. The ion's centre-of-mass motion has a different Hilbert space. In one approximately harmonic direction, a number state $|n⟩$ has energy $E_n=\hslash \nu (n+1/2)$, where $\nu$ denotes a motional angular frequency, not ordinary frequency. The tensor product of quantum systems gives $|g,n⟩$. Cooling towards $n=0$ prepares motion; it does not automatically prepare the internal qubit. Nor does the ground state mean a stationary point particle: zero-point energy and position spread remain.

For several ions, Coulomb forces couple their displacements into collective normal modes. Each selected normal mode has its own quantum harmonic oscillator number states, while each ion retains internal qubit states. A pulse addressing one ion can change a shared mode. This supplies a route to correlations between distant internal quantum states; it also makes residual motional excitation and unwanted excitation of other normal modes relevant. A single-ion pulse calculation alone establishes no experimental multi-ion quantum gate performance.

For an ideal Bose gas in a two-dimensional isotropic harmonic trap, the leading density of states measured above its ground state is $D(E)=E/(\hslash \omega {)}^2$. At saturation of the Bose-Einstein distribution, $N_{\mathrm{ex}}=(k_{B}T/(\hslash \omega ){)}^2{\int }_0^{\infty }u/(e^u-1)du=({\pi }^2/6)(k_{B}T/(\hslash \omega ){)}^2$. The finite excited-state capacity gives the displayed critical temperature and condensate fraction $N_0/N=1-(T/T_c{)}^2$ below it. The appropriate trapped-gas thermodynamic limit fixes $N{\omega }^2$ as $N\to \infty$ and $\omega \to 0$; a finite trap exhibits finite-size rounding. The number density is inhomogeneous, and the physical chemical potential approaches the oscillator ground state energy, not an unshifted zero by convention.

For $Q,L\ge 2$, a periodic Potts chain has $Q$ uniform ground states with energy $-JL$. A single domain wall cannot close around the ring. Its first excited states have two domain walls and energy $-JL+2J$. Choose the wall bonds in $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{L}{2}\right)$ ways and assign distinct states to the two resulting arcs in $Q(Q-1)$ ways. This proves the displayed degeneracy factor without identifying globally relabelled configurations.

Take an isolated two-level system, or a spin one-half qubit, with Pauli matrices ${\sigma }_x,{\sigma }_z$. Let ${\sigma }_z|0⟩=|0⟩$ and ${\sigma }_z|1⟩=-|1⟩$. The initial and final Hamiltonian operators areThe energy gaps are ${\Delta }_i,{\Delta }_f$. Prepare the initial ground state $|0⟩$, with energy eigenvalue $-{\Delta }_i/2$. A final orthonormal eigenbasis isDirect matrix multiplication gives $H_f|g_f⟩=-{\Delta }_f|g_f⟩/2$ and $H_f|e_f⟩=+{\Delta }_f|e_f⟩/2$. The unchanged initial quantum state is $|0⟩=c|g_f⟩-s|e_f⟩$. Its new probability amplitudes are the inner products $c,-s$; the Born rule gives $p_g=c^2,p_e=s^2$. The angle between the real amplitude vectors is $\theta /2$, whereas the Hamiltonian axis on the Bloch sphere rotates through $\theta$.

At $\theta =\pi /3$, $c=\sqrt{3}/2$ and $s=1/2$, so the final energy measurement gives $-{\Delta }_f/2$ with probability $3/4$ and $+{\Delta }_f/2$ with probability $1/4$. At $\theta =0$ the initial ground state remains the final ground state; at $\theta =\pi$ it is the final excited energy eigenstate. These statements are about the new energy labels, not an instantaneous physical rotation of the quantum state.

The normalized vacuum state annihilated by $c=ua-v{b}^{†}$ and $d=v{a}^{†}+ub$, for positive $u,v$ with $u^2+v^2=1$. Since $(a^{†}{b}^{†}{)}^2=0$, it can also be written $u\exp [(v/u)a^{†}{b}^{†}]|0⟩$. Acting with either annihilation operator makes the two terms cancel. Its original occupation numbers each have expected value $v^2$ and its pair amplitude is $⟨ab⟩=-uv$. It has even fermion parity although the original total number operator is not sharp. For the two-orbital fermionic pairing Hamiltonian, it is the unique ground state of energy $\epsilon -\sqrt{{\epsilon }^2+{\Delta }^2}$.

An excited state can decay by emitting two photons whose energies sum to the transition energy. In hydrogen, this permits the metastable $2s$ state to reach the ground state during cosmological recombination.

Ultraviolet is electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths shorter than the violet end of ordinarily visible light. The CIE convention uses $100$–$400\mathrm{nm}$, subdivided into UV-A at $315$–$400\mathrm{nm}$, UV-B at $280$–$315\mathrm{nm}$ and UV-C at $100$–$280\mathrm{nm}$. These divisions name intervals; they do not mark universal changes in every material's response. The boundary with visible light is not sharp, and other fields use near-, far-, vacuum- and extreme-ultraviolet divisions. ^[ref]. For example, NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory observes extreme-ultraviolet bands below $100\mathrm{nm}$; the CIE interval is therefore not the full extent of astronomical ultraviolet usage. ^[ref].

The CIE ultraviolet interval corresponds to frequencies about $7.49\times 10^{14}$–$3.00\times 10^{15}\mathrm{Hz}$ and photon energies $4.97\times 10^{-19}$–$1.99\times 10^{-18}\mathrm{J}$, using vacuum wavelength and $E=hc/\lambda$ with Planck constant $h$ and speed of light $c$. Shorter wavelength means larger energy per photon; larger irradiance means more incident power per area. These are different comparisons. At the same incident power, a $254\mathrm{nm}$ ultraviolet beam has fewer photons per second than a $940\mathrm{nm}$ infrared beam, even though each ultraviolet photon has more energy.

A common ultraviolet mechanism is photon absorption promoting an electron from a ground state to an excited state of a chemical atom or molecule. By contrast, many infrared absorption bands involve stretching or bending chemical bonds. For either mechanism, both the energy difference and the coupling to the incident electromagnetic field matter. One concrete example is the $217\mathrm{nm}$ absorption discussed for butadiene: an electron moves between molecular orbitals, and the position of the absorption reveals their energy separation. Ultraviolet absorption can therefore probe molecular orbitals, while infrared spectroscopy probes many molecular motions. ^[ref].

Subsequent chemical reactions depend on the absorbing chemical substance and its environment; the label ultraviolet alone does not predict a reaction rate. At sufficiently short wavelength, a photon can cause photoionization if its energy exceeds the relevant ionization energy. There is no single wavelength that separates all ionizing from all nonionizing behavior for every chemical substance. Likewise, eventual heating after photon absorption is possible in both ultraviolet and infrared. The distinction is useful because different optical spectra expose different processes, not because the two ranges obey different laws of electromagnetism.

Ritter's 1801 observation used a chemical readout rather than a thermometer. In Caltech/IPAC's account, sunlight passed through a glass optical prism and silver chloride was placed in different parts of the optical spectrum. Darkening was weak toward red, stronger toward violet, and pronounced beyond the visible violet edge. The measured evidence was a change in the chemical substance's appearance at a spatial location with no visible color, establishing radiation beyond the eye's ordinary range. It was not a calibrated measurement of a universal ultraviolet optical spectrum. ^[ref].

A controlled modern interpretation of such a chemical test would compare equal exposure durations and matched fresh samples, keep an unexposed sample in darkness, monitor temperature, and distinguish scattered visible light from the intended short-wavelength beam with characterized filtering. These are proposed controls, not an assertion that Ritter performed them. Unequal sample preparation or heating can change a reaction rate. The optical prism, terrestrial atmosphere and sample response restrict which wavelengths the test detects. Darkening is a detector-weighted response, so its spatial maximum is not automatically the maximum of incoming radiant flux or of photon energy.

Thomas Larason and Jeanne Houston's NIST report documents a quantitative ultraviolet detector comparison. An argon source feeds a double-diffraction grating spectrometer; a shutter and mirrors deliver the selected band to a working-standard or test photodiode, successively at the same position. A beam splitter supplies a monitor photodiode. Amplifiers and voltmeters record detector and monitor simultaneously; shutter-closed readings provide dark baselines. The $200$–$500\mathrm{nm}$ scan, typically with $4\mathrm{nm}$ bandpass, measures spectral responsivity. Monitor normalization suppresses source drift; known spectral lines calibrate wavelength. The report assesses temperature effects and unwanted light outside the band, weighted by detector response. The latter need not cancel between different spectral responsivities. ^[ref].

This determines electrical response without visual perception. Bandpass and spatial nonuniformity limit the calibration; aging and changed temperature can affect later use. The scan includes visible light and ultraviolet; no response below $200\mathrm{nm}$ follows from it.

For a narrow beam, the idealized substitution calculation isHere $R$ is spectral responsivity; $I$ and $M$ are dark-subtracted detector and monitor electric currents. This follows by writing $I=RP$ for each detector and using the monitor to track changes in radiant flux. It assumes linear response, unchanged beam splitting and collection geometry, and a sufficiently narrow band. For an illustrative standard with $R_{\mathrm{std}}=0.15\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{W}}^{-1}$, ratios $I_{\mathrm{std}}/M_{\mathrm{std}}=2.0$ and $I_{\mathrm{test}}/M_{\mathrm{test}}=1.6$ give $R_{\mathrm{test}}=0.12\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{W}}^{-1}$. These invented arithmetic inputs illustrate the method; they are not NIST measurements.

An independent photon-counting model connects spectral responsivity to quantum efficiency. If $\eta (\lambda )$ is the number of collected electrons per incident photon, there is no internal multiplication, and $q$ is the elementary charge, thenAt illustrative constant $\eta =0.60$ and $P=1\mu \mathrm{W}$, this gives about $0.123\mu \mathrm{A}$ at $254\mathrm{nm}$ and $0.455\mu \mathrm{A}$ at $940\mathrm{nm}$. The ultraviolet readout is smaller in this model because there are fewer incident photons, not because their individual energies are smaller. Real quantum efficiency depends on wavelength, windows, absorption and carrier collection; a detector's band gap and construction determine its usable range. Constant $\eta$ across these two wavelengths is an analytical comparison, not a claimed specification of a real photodiode.

The curve is the calculated relation $E=hc/\lambda$, and the shaded ranges use the stated CIE conventions. The lower diagram abstracts the detector comparison rather than reproducing an instrument drawing. Together with the infrared heat-balance illustration, it shows why a calibrated detector response, rather than what looks bright to an observer, is the bridge between invisible radiation and a quantitative measurement.

The variational method estimates the lowest energy of a Quantum Hamiltonian by choosing a trial wavefunction, evaluating its energy, and optimizing the trial parameters. It uses the quantum variational principle, the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle expressed for quantum states. Let $H$ be a self-adjoint operator bounded below, and define $E_0=\inf \sigma (H)$, the bottom of its spectrum. Every normalized admissible trial quantum state satisfiesWhen $E_0$ is an energy eigenvalue, it is the ground-state energy; equality holds precisely for a quantum state in the ground-state subspace. Otherwise the bottom of the spectrum need not be attained by any normalizable wavefunction.

Admissible means finite form energy. Choose a real $b\le E_0$ and use the shifted quadratic form of a positive quantum Hamiltonian:The form domain $Q(H)$ is independent of this choice of $b$ and can be larger than the operator domain $D(H)$. For $\psi \in D(H)$, $E_{\psi }=⟨\psi ,H\psi ⟩$ is the usual expectation value; for nonzero unnormalized trials, divide $q_H[\psi ]$ by $\Vert \psi {\Vert }^2$ to get the form version of the Rayleigh quotient. See the quantum variational principle for the general domain justification.

Thus each trial energy is an upper bound on $E_0$, and minimizing within a trial family improves that upper bound. It is not a lower bound on $E_0$. The Gaussian variational energy for the harmonic oscillator reaches $E_0=1/2$ because its family contains an exact ground state. The exact variational solution in a two-level system makes the equality condition visible as vanishing excited-state probability amplitude.

The method is useful when solving the Schrödinger equation exactly is difficult but integrals of a trial wavefunction are tractable. Enlarging a trial family cannot increase its optimal energy, although an optimum need not be attained. The beauty is that even an imperfect trial gives a rigorous bound, provided its form energy is computed exactly: numerical integration errors require separate control. The Gaussian variational estimate for a solvable sextic potential provides an existing example beyond a quantum harmonic oscillator.

A short proof explains the direction. With a complete orthonormal eigenbasis of energy eigenstates, write $\psi ={\sum }_n{c}_n{\varphi }_n$, where $H{\varphi }_n=E_n{\varphi }_n$ and ${\sum }_n|c_n{|}^2=1$. ThenThis is a weighted mean of nonnegative energy differences; equality requires every occupied energy eigenstate to have energy $E_0$. ^[ref]. For continuous spectrum, the spectral theorem replaces the sum by an integral against the scalar spectral measure of $\psi$, with the same nonnegative integrand. This proves the bound without assuming an orthonormal eigenbasis exists.

The historical setting predates quantum mechanics: Rayleigh's The Theory of Sound, volume I, appeared in 1877, and Ritz's paper on solving variational problems of mathematical physics appeared in volume 135 of Crelle's journal, catalogued by its publisher as 1909, pp. 1–61. These are original works associated with the Rayleigh-Ritz method; the dates here identify the publications rather than assert priority. ^[ref]; ^[ref].

In the ideal electric-dipole interaction, a vibrational transition needs a nonzero matrix element of the electric dipole moment. For a diatomic bond stretch, expand the body-axis dipole component as $d(q)=d_e+d_e^{\prime }q+\cdots$. A changing electric dipole moment, rather than a permanent value $d_e$ alone, permits the harmonic fundamental. Keeping only the linear term and harmonic wavefunctions gives $\Delta v=\pm 1$.^[ref]

The derivation is sharper than a picture of a shaking molecule. Orthogonality removes the constant term for $v^{\prime }\ne v$, and creation and annihilation operators giveHere $\delta$ is the Kronecker delta. Thus absorption raises $v$ by one when the dipole derivative and angular factor are nonzero, and its photon satisfiesA nonzero vibrational matrix element is only one factor: rotational electric-dipole selection rules, initial populations, and spectral resolution also constrain visibility.

For an isolated diatomic molecule with identical atomic nuclei, such as molecular hydrogen in its symmetric electronic ground state, stretching preserves zero electric dipole moment. By symmetry, this homonuclear stretch is infrared inactive in the ideal dipole model, although it still vibrates. Other interactions or environments can permit detection.^[ref]

A hopping process through an intermediate configuration of different unperturbed energy, contributing to a low-energy effective description through perturbation theory. If an intermediate state costs $\Delta >0$, second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory gives a contribution $-|⟨a|T|0⟩{|}^2/\Delta$. Its amplitude is of order $t/\Delta$ and its energy correction of order $-t^2/\Delta$; a degenerate low-energy sector requires the corresponding degenerate perturbation theory before identifying the ground state.

A wavefunction is the position representation of a pure state. In the one-dimensional model used here, $\psi (x,t)$ takes values in the complex numbers, and the Born rule givesThe probability density $\rho$ has units of inverse length; the wavefunction has units of inverse square root of length. A value of $\rho$ at a point is not itself a probability: probabilities come from an integral over a region. For the infinite square well ground state, $\rho (L/2)=2/L$, whereas the probability of the exact single point $L/2$ is zero. The interesting question is how much probability a finite interval contains.

Two wavefunctions differing only by a global phase represent the same pure state. Relative quantum phases between components of a quantum superposition affect matter-wave interference, so retaining the full complex number amplitude is essential. This scalar description covers a particle without active spin degrees of freedom; a general electron wavefunction can have two spin components, with the position probability density obtained by adding the squared modulus of each component.

A centred width-$L$ infinite square well has ground state wavefunction $\sqrt{2/L}\cos (\pi x/L)$ inside and zero outside. Its momentum representation in quantum mechanics follows from the Fourier transform of a truncated cosine. The probability density in the title has removable singularities at $k=\pm \pi /L$, with limit $L/(4\pi )$, and an oscillatory $k^{-4}$ tail envelope. The distribution is even, with $⟨k⟩=0$ and $⟨k^2⟩={\pi }^2/L^2$.

The drive can supply or extract work while the quantum state stays approximately fixed. For a differentiable bounded Hamiltonian operator, the Schrödinger equation givesThe state-evolution terms cancel, leaving the external drive's power. For a finite ideal step the change in mean energy is $⟨\psi |H_f-H_i|\psi ⟩$. Thus conservation of energy for a closed system with a time-independent Hamiltonian operator does not assert conservation of the driven subsystem's energy during switching.

Specify work operationally by two energy measurements: one before the switch and one after. For the prepared initial ground state, the first outcome is definite; the second samples the new Born rule probabilities. This protocol gives a distribution of measured energy differences, rather than generally the measurement distribution of the single operator $H_f-H_i$.^[ref]and henceFor ${\Delta }_i={\Delta }_f=\Delta$ and $\theta =\pi /3$, the work is $0$ or $\Delta$, with probabilities $3/4$ and $1/4$; its expectation is $\Delta /4$ and its variance is $3{\Delta }^2/16$. The initial mean energy $-\Delta /2$ becomes $-\Delta /4$. Using different initial and final scalar offsets would also shift the measured work; the displayed Hamiltonian operators fix that convention explicitly.

For $H=\alpha a^{†}a+\Delta (a^2+a^{†2})/2$, a finite real squeeze requires $\alpha >|\Delta |$. At $\alpha =\Delta >0$, the Hamiltonian instead equals $\alpha Q^2-\alpha /2$, with $Q=(a+a^{†})/\sqrt{2}$. The formal oscillator frequency is zero, but this operator is not constant: $⟨2|H|0⟩=\alpha /\sqrt{2}$. Thus a normalizable oscillator ground state and finite canonical squeeze cannot be obtained by simply substituting zero frequency into the positive-frequency formula.

Zero-point motion is the nonzero quantum fluctuation of position and momentum in a system's ground state. For a quantum harmonic oscillator, the ground state has energy $\hslash \omega /2$ and nonzero position and momentum variances even at zero temperature. It does not represent a thermal mixture and need not carry entropy. The large zero-point motion of light helium atoms helps explain why helium can remain a liquid at low pressure even as temperature approaches absolute zero.

At fixed odd $N$, the zero-temperature canonical ensemble equally weights the $2N$ ground states of an antiferromagnetic Ising ring. The single frustrated bond in an antiferromagnetic Ising ring lies on a chosen $n$-bond path with probability $n/N$. The Ising spin product is $(-1{)}^n$ if the path excludes that bond and $-(-1{)}^n$ if it includes it, proving the displayed two-point correlation function. The loss of staggered alignment upon averaging persists at zero temperature and is caused by geometric frustration, rather than a positive density of thermal defects. The expression remains symmetric under $n\mapsto N-n$ for odd $N$.

For $M$ complete energy eigenstates of a one-particle Quantum Hamiltonian for identical noninteracting fermions, order their energies ${ϵ}_1\le \cdots \le {ϵ}_M$. At fixed particle number $0\le N\le M$, the Quantum Hamiltonian and the particle-number constraint areThe ground state occupies the $N$ lowest complete one-particle states. A short minimization argument suffices: moving an occupant from a higher energy to an empty lower energy decreases the total energy. This filling describes the ground state at temperature $T=0$; exclusion by itself also applies to excited quantum states and at positive temperature. The underlying thermal description is the Fermi-Dirac distribution.^[ref]

If the last occupied energy belongs to a group of $g$ one-particle states at the same energy and $q$ of them must be occupied, with all lower states filled, the ground state subspace has dimension $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{g}{q}\right)$. Exclusion does not select a particular basis or a particular quantum superposition in that subspace. The factor of two for an electron spatial orbital assumes both spin projections are included; a model restricted to one spin projection has only one state per spatial orbital. A magnetic field can split the degenerate energy levels, and interactions can change the lowest-energy electron configuration. Thus this finite noninteracting filling rule is not a complete prescription for interacting chemical atoms.