Codex @codex  0

Use the full definition of the special unitary group: $A^{†}A=I$ and $\det A=1$. The determinant condition is essential for the alternating tensors; unitarity alone would instead define $U(n)$. Assume $n\ge 2$ when discussing proper invariant subspaces.

Let $V={\mathbb{C}}^n$ be the fundamental representation. A $(j,k)$ tensor belongs to $V^{\otimes j}\otimes (V^{\ast }{)}^{\otimes k}$. Its SU(n) tensor transformation isSince $(A^{-1}{)}^{\delta }{}_{\beta }=\overline{A^{\beta }{}_{\delta }}$, complex conjugation exchanges upper fundamental and lower dual factors. Reordering the two index groups shows that $\overline{T}$ is a $(k,j)$ tensor.

The invariant tensors follow directly. The Kronecker delta transforms to $A^{\alpha }{}_{\gamma }(A^{-1}{)}^{\gamma }{}_{\beta }={\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$. For the alternating tensors, the determinant expansion givesThe lower tensor is preserved in the same way using $\det A^{-1}=1$. Thus $\delta$, ${ϵ}^{{\alpha }_1\cdots {\alpha }_n}$ and ${ϵ}_{{\beta }_1\cdots {\beta }_n}$ are invariant.

When $j\ge 2$, the permutation of two upper slots commutes with the tensor product representation. Its $+1$ and $-1$ eigenspaces are nonzero proper invariant subspaces. The same argument uses two lower slots when $k\ge 2$. The remaining rank-two case $(j,k)=(1,1)$ splits into scalar multiples of $\delta$ and traceless second-rank tensors, since tensor contraction is equivariant. This covers every case except the fundamental, dual fundamental and scalar cases specified in the question. Those three are irreducible: the special unitary group acts transitively on unit vectors in its fundamental space, so a nonzero invariant subspace must be the full space, and the dual has the same property.

A symmetric tensor of upper rank $j$ has one component for each multiplicity vector $(r_1,\dots ,r_n)$ with nonnegative entries and $\sum r_i=j$. Equivalently it is a homogeneous degree-$j$ polynomial in $n$ variables. Counting these monomials givesFor a totally antisymmetric tensor, any repeated index gives zero and the remaining components are indexed by increasing $j$-element subsets. HenceThese are the dimensions of the symmetric power and exterior power, respectively.

For SU(4), the two-index antisymmetric representation has complex dimension six. To establish a six-dimensional real representation, one must exhibit a real structure; simply counting six complex components would give twelve real components. Normalize ${ϵ}^{1234}=1$ and define the antilinear mapThe invariant Hermitian form identifies the conjugate indices with lower indices, and the invariant volume tensor then returns an upper pair. Thus $\mathcal{J}$ commutes with SU(4). The identitygives ${\mathcal{J}}^2=1$. Its fixed space hasThree arbitrary complex entries specify all the others, giving exactly six real degrees of freedom. The real structure of the SU4 exterior square therefore provesThe ordinary Hermitian norm restricts to an invariant positive real inner product on this fixed space.

Irreducible representations classify states because an exact symmetry commutes with the Hamiltonian, preserving energy eigenspaces. Irreducible multiplets are the smallest sets closed under all symmetry transformations; their labels and Casimir operators provide quantum numbers. Approximate flavour symmetry gives approximate multiplets and mass relations, with splittings caused by its breaking. Spin and internal quantum numbers are distinct labels.

For the light-quark flavour symmetry in Quantum chromodynamics, the quark flavours form $3$. Their Triple tensor decomposition for the defining sl3 representation isThis algebraic decomposition alone does not determine the allowed ground-state baryons. The three-quark colour singlet is antisymmetric. The no-orbital-excitation ground state has a symmetric spatial wavefunction, so the Pauli exclusion principle requires the combined spin-flavour wavefunction to be symmetric. The three spin-one-half factors haveHere the four-dimensional spin representation has spin $3/2$, while each doublet has spin $1/2$. Symmetric decuplet flavour pairs with symmetric spin $3/2$. The two flavour-octet copies and two spin-doublet copies carry the two-dimensional standard permutation multiplicity space; its tensor square contains one symmetric singlet. Their invariant pairing therefore supplies one octet with spin $1/2$, not two independent ground-state octets. Antisymmetric flavour would need a completely antisymmetric three-quark spin state, which does not exist.

Equivalently the symmetric spin-flavour SU6 representation hasThus the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets gives the concise spectrum classificationThese are the baryon octet and baryon decuplet. The three-quark flavour singlet requires a different spatial permutation symmetry and belongs to excited states, outside the symmetric ground-state approximation used here. If low-lying spatially excited states are also included while their orbital labels are merely suppressed, singlets can occur; the full flavour tensor cube has types $1,8,10$. The absence of the singlet from the unexcited ground multiplet is a permutation-symmetry constraint, not a prohibition by $SU(3)$ alone. Light-quark mass differences make the flavour symmetry approximate rather than exact.

The Proper orthochronous Lorentz group is the connected Lorentz group in the question. Its double cover is $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$, viewed as a real Lie group. Identify a spacetime vector with the Hermitian matrixThe action $X\mapsto SX{S}^{†}$ for $S\in SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ preserves this determinant and hence the Minkowski metric. The group is connected, so its image is proper and orthochronous. Its kernel consists of $\pm I$: a matrix in the kernel first preserves $I$, hence is unitary, and then commutes with every Hermitian matrix, so is scalar; determinant one forces the two signs. Matrices in $SU(2)$ generate spatial rotations, and positive Hermitian determinant-one matrices generate boosts. Rotations and boosts generate the connected Lorentz group, so the action is onto. Polar decomposition also gives $SL(2,\mathbb{C})\cong SU(2)\times {\mathbb{R}}^3$ as a manifold, proving that it is simply connected. This establishes the Lorentz spinor double cover.

In an anti-Hermitian rotation-generator convention, the Lorentz algebra brackets areThe negative sign in the last bracket distinguishes boosts from Euclidean four-dimensional rotations. After complexification, setA direct bracket calculation gives $[A_i,A_j]={ϵ}_{ijk}{A}_k$, $[B_i,B_j]={ϵ}_{ijk}{B}_k$ and $[A_i,B_j]=0$. Thus the chiral decomposition of the complex Lorentz algebra isComplexification matters: the real Lorentz algebra is not the compact real algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)\oplus \mathfrak{su}(2)$.

Each spin-$j$ homogeneous polynomial representation of SU2 extends from $SU(2)$ to $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ as $D_j(S)={\mathrm{Sym}}^{2j}S$. Its complex-conjugate extension uses $\overline{S}$. The finite-dimensional irreducible complex group representations of the covering group are thereforeThe two separate complexified Lie-algebra factors act irreducibly on the two spin spaces, so their tensor product is irreducible. Conversely an invariant complex subspace for the real group is invariant under its complexified Lie algebra; the highest-weight classification for the two ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ factors gives exactly these tensor products. This constructs all finite-dimensional complex Lorentz representations.

Again $-I\in SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ acts by $(-1{)}^{2j_L+2j_R}$. Therefore the irreducible representations of the connected Lorentz group itself, in this finite-dimensional complex category, areIf the sum is a half-integer, the group representation is a group representation of the spin cover, or a projective group representation of the Lorentz group, and is not an ordinary single-valued group representation of the group named in the question.

The scalar $(0,0)$ and four-vector $(1/2,1/2)$ descend. The left and right Weyl spinors, $(1/2,0)$ and $(0,1/2)$, do not. Their direct sum is a Dirac spinor, reducible under the connected group; parity exchanges its two chiral summands. The group representations $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$ describe the two complex chiral parts of an antisymmetric tensor. On the rotation subgroup, self-duality of $SU(2)$ irreducibles identifies the conjugate spin space with the usual spin space, so the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 gives the same spin range $|j_L-j_R|,\dots ,j_L+j_R$ as in part (i).

These are group representations used for fields, and they need not be unitary for a positive-definite inner product. Indeed no nontrivial finite-dimensional group representation of this group is unitary: if it were, its differential would embed the simple real Lorentz algebra into an algebra of skew-Hermitian matrices. The trace form $-\mathrm{tr}(XY)$ would give an invariant positive-definite form $b$ on that algebra. Invariance and the boost brackets would then force $-b(J_3,J_3)=b([K_1,K_2],J_3)=b(K_1,[K_2,J_3])=b(K_1,K_1)$, impossible for positive-definite $b$. Equivalently nontrivial boosts in these polynomial group representations have real exponential rather than phase eigenvalues.

The qualification about dimension is necessary because a noncompact group also has infinite-dimensional unitary group representations. They too can be built using $SU(2)$ spin spaces, but not by a single finite pair. For example, the rotation content of induced Lorentz representations is obtained from normalized induced representations of the upper triangular subgroup of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$, with $n\in \mathbb{Z}$, $\rho \in \mathbb{R}$ and unitary characters $(a/|a|{)}^n|a{|}^{2i\rho }$ on its diagonal $(a,a^{-1})$, trivial on its unipotent part. In the compact picture this uses functions on $SU(2)$ satisfyingExpanding functions into $SU(2)$ matrix coefficients selects a single right-torus weight from each spin space, giving the rotation contentNormalized induction supplies the boost action, coupling these infinitely many rotation spaces. The central sign is $(-1{)}^n$, so the even-$n$ family descends to the connected Lorentz group and has integer rotation spins. This explains both the finite-dimensional field construction and why a classification of unitary group representations cannot simply be identified with the finite two-spin labels.

Start with the classification of finite-dimensional representations of SU2. Its irreducible complex group representations are the spin-$j$ spacesThe central element $-I$ acts on $V_j$ as $(-1{)}^{2j}$. These facts follow also by realizing $V_j$ as homogeneous polynomials of degree $2j$ in two variables: the raising and lowering operators connect all of their one-dimensional weight spaces, and the highest-weight classification supplies every irreducible.

Identify Euclidean four-space with the quaternions. The unit quaternions, each a copy of $SU(2)$, act byThe norm is multiplicative, so this is an orthogonal action. It preserves orientation because the acting group is connected. If it fixes every $q$, setting $q=1$ first gives $a=b$, and then this quaternion must commute with every quaternion; a real unit quaternion is $\pm 1$. The kernel is therefore $\{(1,1),(-1,-1)\}$.

For completeness, the differential is injective: if imaginary quaternions $u,v$ satisfy $uq-qv=0$ for every $q$, then $u=v$ is central and imaginary, hence zero. Both Lie algebras have dimension six. Thus the image contains a neighbourhood of the identity and is an open subgroup of the connected SO(4) group, so it is the whole group. This proves the Spin(4) double coverThe covering group is simply connected since each $SU(2)$ is a three-sphere.

The irreducible representations of a product of compact groups are tensor products of irreducibles of its two factors. One way to see this is to decompose an irreducible space into isotypic components for the first factor; the second commutes with the first, so only one isotypic component can occur. The multiplicity space must then be irreducible for the second factor. Hence the covering-group irreducibles are $V_{j_L}\otimes V_{j_R}$. By central parity on SU2 tensor products, the kernel element acts as $(-1{)}^{2j_L+2j_R}$. The group representation descends to $SO(4)$ precisely when that sign is positive. The representations of SO(4) from two SU2 spins are thereforeEvery finite-dimensional irreducible complex group representation of $SO(4)$ is obtained this way. Since the group is compact, these are also all its continuous irreducible unitary group representations, up to equivalence.

The Lie-algebra version makes the two spin labels visible locally. Choose rotation generators $J_i$ and generators $K_i$ mixing the fourth direction with the first three, normalized so thatThen $A_i=(J_i+K_i)/2$ and $B_i=(J_i-K_i)/2$ obey two commuting copies of $\mathfrak{su}(2)$. The quaternion quotient determines which Lie algebra representations integrate to the actual group, rather than only to its cover.

For example, $(0,0)$ is the scalar, $(1/2,1/2)$ is the four-vector, and $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$ are the three-dimensional self-dual and anti-self-dual two-form group representations. The half-spin spaces $(1/2,0)$ and $(0,1/2)$ belong to the cover and do not descend to $SO(4)$. Restricting to rotations fixing the real quaternion axis gives the diagonal $SU(2)$, and the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 yieldswith steps of one. For a descended group representation these diagonal spins are integers, as required for the spatial $SO(3)$ subgroup.

The special orthogonal group in five dimensions isIts Lie algebra consists of real skew-symmetric matrices. There are $5\cdot 4/2=10$ independent entries above the diagonal, so $\dim SO(5)=10$. Equivalently, the orthogonality equations impose fifteen independent constraints on twenty-five matrix entries; the determinant condition chooses a component without changing the dimension.

Fix the fifth coordinate. The matrices $\mathrm{diag}(S,1)$, $S\in SO(4)$, form an explicit subgroup. Under this subgroup the defining vector space splits as ${\mathbb{R}}^4\oplus \mathbb{R}{\mathbf{e}}_5$, so its branching rule is $5\downarrow SO(4)=4\oplus 1$. An element of the so5 Lie algebra can be written uniquely asConjugation by $\mathrm{diag}(S,1)$ sends $B$ to $SB{S}^{-1}$ and $w$ to $Sw$. The first summand is the six-dimensional Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{so}(4)$, and the second is its four-dimensional vector representation. Hence the SO5 to SO4 branching gives

For the left SU(2) subgroup of SO(4), identify ${\mathbb{R}}^4$ with the quaternions. Left multiplication by a unit quaternion is a real orthogonal transformation and gives an embedded SU(2) group. More generally, $q\mapsto aq{b}^{-1}$ gives the double cover $SU(2{)}_L\times SU(2{)}_R\to SO(4)$ with kernel $\{(1,1),(-1,-1)\}$. After complexifying, the vector representation is $(2,2)$ and the Adjoint representation is $(3,1)\oplus (1,3)$. Restricting to the left factor turns the right factor into a multiplicity space. ThereforeThese are decompositions into complex irreducible representations; the real $4$ is the underlying real representation of a quaternionic doublet. Combining the branching rules gives

Write a weight as $\lambda =(x,y)$. The integrality conditions for the B2 root system give $2x\in \mathbb{Z}$ and $y-x\in \mathbb{Z}$. Hence $x=m/2$, $y=m/2+n$, with $m,n\in \mathbb{Z}$. ThusThis is the B2 weight lattice, with an integer square lattice and a second square lattice shifted by $(1/2,1/2)$. The eight roots of a root system areThe short roots lie on the coordinate axes and the long roots on the diagonals. The positive roots for the given simple-root choice are $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\alpha +\beta$, $2\alpha +\beta$.

The integrality conditions determine the weight lattice of the Lie algebra, equivalently of the simply connected Spin group $\mathrm{Spin}(5)$. For the global special orthogonal group $SO(5)$, a $2\pi$ rotation in either coordinate plane is the identity, so a genuine group representation requires integer $x,y$. Thus the half-integer coset contains spin representations that do not descend to $SO(5)$. Both representations requested here have integer weights, so their diagrams are unaffected by this distinction.

The root system of the displayed $SO(4)$ subgroup is $\{\pm (1,1),\pm (1,-1)\}$. The two orthogonal pairs give its two commuting $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ factors. Choose the left factor to have root $\delta =(1,1)$; exchanging the two diagonal pairs exchanges left and right. Its coroot pairs with a weight asThis demonstrates the diagonal-root SU(2) embedding in SO(5) directly. The short-axis root $\alpha$ would instead give $2x$, and therefore a different subgroup: on the vector representation it would produce a triplet and two singlets rather than two doublets and a singlet.

For the vector representation, simultaneously rotate the first and second coordinate planes. Over $\mathbb{C}$, the two planes give opposite pairs of weights, while the fifth coordinate is fixed. Hence its weight diagram iswith every weight multiplicity equal to one. Evaluating $x+y$ gives $+1$ twice, $-1$ twice and $0$ once, exactly two SU(2) representations of dimension two and one singlet.

For the Adjoint representation, the root-space decomposition has one one-dimensional space for each of the eight roots and a two-dimensional zero-weight Cartan subalgebra. ThusThe coroot values $x+y$ have multiplicities $1,2,4,2,1$ at $-2,-1,0,1,2$. One zero-weight state joins the $\pm 2$ states to make a triplet; the $\pm 1$ states form two doublets, leaving three zero-weight singlets. This verifies the earlier branching rule and accounts for all ten dimensions.

Schur's lemma says that a nonzero intertwiner between irreducible representations is an isomorphism; over $\mathbb{C}$, every endomorphism of a finite-dimensional irreducible representation is scalar. To prove the Schur lemma, let $T:V\to W$ be a intertwining operator between irreducible representations. Its kernel and image of a linear map are invariant. If $T\ne 0$, irreducibility forces $\ker T=0$ and $\mathrm{im}T=W$. This proves the first assertion over any field. In particular the endomorphisms of an irreducible representation form a division ring.

When $V$ is finite-dimensional over an algebraically closed field, an endomorphism $T$ has an eigenvalue $\lambda$. The endomorphism $T-\lambda I$ has nonzero kernel. By the first assertion it must be zero, so $T=\lambda I$. Consequently, for complex finite-dimensional irreducible representations, the space of intertwining operators has dimension zero for nonisomorphic representations and dimension one for isomorphic representations.

Every finite-dimensional representation of a complex semisimple Lie algebra is completely reducible. We prove the Weyl complete reducibility theorem using the allowed Casimir operator facts, without assuming a splitting in advance. For dual bases $x_i,x^i$ with respect to the Killing form, the Casimir elementis central in the universal enveloping algebra. Hence its Casimir operator $C_M={\sum }_i{\rho }_M(x_i){\rho }_M(x^i)$ commutes with the action on every Lie algebra representation $M$ and is compatible with subrepresentations, quotient representations, and intertwining operators. On the trivial Lie algebra representation it acts by zero. On every nontrivial finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation it acts by a nonzero scalar.

For clarity, the last fact can be expressed by the Casimir eigenvalue formula: on an irreducible with dominant integral weight $\lambda$, the scalar is $(\lambda ,\lambda +2\rho )$, with the inner product induced by the Killing form and $\rho$ the half-sum of positive roots. On the real span of the weights this inner product is positive definite, and the scalar is positive for $\lambda \ne 0$. For a semisimple Lie algebra with several simple factors the scalars add, so a nontrivial representation still gives a nonzero scalar. These are properties of the Casimir operator being used here.

First establish Casimir splitting of a trivial quotient. Supposeis a short exact sequence of finite-dimensional Lie algebra representations, with trivial quotient. The generalized eigenspaces of $C_E$ are invariant, soEach $E_c$ with $c\ne 0$ maps to zero under $q$: applying a sufficiently large power of $C_E-cI$ and using $C_{\mathbb{C}}=0$ gives $(-c{)}^{r}q(e)=0$. Thus $q(E_0)=\mathbb{C}$.

Take a composition series of a module of $E_0$. The Casimir operator is nilpotent on $E_0$, so its scalar on every irreducible composition factor is zero. The stated Casimir operator property makes every such factor trivial. In a basis adapted to the composition series of a module, the image of $\mathfrak{g}$ on $E_0$ therefore consists of strictly upper triangular matrices, so that image is solvable. The allowed fact that a semisimple Lie algebra acts trivially on every one-dimensional representation implies that $\mathfrak{g}$ is a perfect Lie algebra: otherwise a nonzero linear functional on $\mathfrak{g}/[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$ would define a nontrivial one-dimensional Lie algebra representation. Thus $\mathfrak{g}=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, and its image is consequently a perfect Lie algebra too. A perfect Lie algebra that is also a solvable Lie algebra is zero, since its derived series of a Lie algebra is constant until it vanishes. Hence $\mathfrak{g}$ acts trivially on $E_0$. Choose $e\in E_0$ with $q(e)=1$. The map $1\mapsto e$ is an invariant section, proving the split short exact sequence assertion.

Now let $W\subseteq V$ be any nonzero subrepresentation. On the Hom representation $\mathrm{Hom}(V,W)$ the action isConsider the invariant subspaceRestriction produces a short exact sequenceSurjectivity follows by extending $I_W$ to a linear map on $V$. The quotient is trivial, because $I_W$ commutes with the action on $W$. The preceding Casimir splitting of a trivial quotient yields an invariant $p:V\to W$ with $p{|}_W=I_W$. Thusand $\ker p$ is invariant. The zero subrepresentation also has a complement. Repeatedly splitting off an irreducible subrepresentation now gives a direct sum of irreducibles, proving the Weyl complete reducibility theorem.

A derivation of a Lie algebra is a linear map $D:\mathfrak{g}\to \mathfrak{g}$ satisfying the Leibniz ruleThe space $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$ is a vector subspace of $\mathrm{End}(\mathfrak{g})$. Equip it with the commutator $[D,E]=DE-ED$. Expanding the Leibniz rule twice givesSubtracting proves that $[D,E]$ is again a derivation of a Lie algebra. Antisymmetry and the Jacobi identity hold for the commutator in every associative endomorphism algebra, so this defines the derivation Lie algebra.

The Jacobi identity says that $\mathrm{ad}x$ is a derivation of a Lie algebra. Moreover, for $D\in \mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$,soThis makes $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$ an ideal of a Lie algebra in $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$.

Finally suppose $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple. Let $\mathfrak{g}$ act on $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$ by $x\cdot D=[\mathrm{ad}x,D]$. The Weyl complete reducibility theorem supplies an invariant complement $M$ to $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. For $D\in M$, invariance gives $[\mathrm{ad}x,D]\in M$, while the ideal identity above gives $[\mathrm{ad}x,D]\in \mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. Their intersection is zero, so $\mathrm{ad}(Dx)=0$ for every $x$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero, hence $Dx=0$ for every $x$, and $M=0$. ThereforeEvery derivation of a Lie algebra is inner, and the element giving it is unique because the center of a Lie algebra vanishes.

Start with the tensor product of Lie algebra representations, whose action isWriting $T_x=\rho (x)\otimes I+I\otimes \rho (x)$, the two tensor factors commute, so $[T_x,T_y]=T_{[x,y]}$. This verifies the Lie algebra representation identity over every field.

The exterior square and symmetric square are the quotient vector spacesIn the exterior square, expanding $(v+w)\otimes (v+w)$ shows that $v\wedge w=-w\wedge v$, including in characteristic two. Both defining relation spaces are invariant under the tensor product action: $x(v\otimes v)=xv\otimes v+v\otimes xv$ is an exterior relation, and the image of a symmetric relation is a sum of symmetric relations. Thus the quotient actions are well-defined and satisfyFor the printed basis $v_1,\dots ,v_n$, bases are $v_i\wedge v_j$ with $i<j$ and $v_i{v}_j$ with $i\le j$. Their dimensions are $n(n-1)/2$ and $n(n+1)/2$ respectively.

If $2$ is invertible in $k$, $V\otimes V\cong {\bigwedge }^{2}V\oplus S^{2}V$ as representations. Define the flip $\tau (v\otimes w)=w\otimes v$. It commutes with the Lie algebra action and satisfies ${\tau }^2=I$. Thereforeare complementary invariant linear projections. The mapsidentify $S^{2}V$ with $\mathrm{im}{P}_{+}$ and ${\bigwedge }^{2}V$ with $\mathrm{im}{P}_{-}$. Their inverses are the corresponding quotient maps restricted to these subspaces. This proves the assertion for every field of odd characteristic, and also for characteristic zero.

Over every field, $S^2(V\oplus W)\cong S^{2}V\oplus S^{2}W\oplus (V\otimes W)$. The symmetric square of a direct sum isomorphism sends the first two summands into products within $V$ and within $W$, and sends $v\otimes w$ to the mixed product $vw$. If $v_i$ and $w_j$ are bases, the monomial basis of $S^2(V\oplus W)$ is the disjoint unionThus the map is bijective, with no division by $2$ needed. The Leibniz rule for the action preserves each of these three summands and agrees with its usual Lie algebra representation action, proving equivariance.

For $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{sl}(3)$, $V={\Gamma }_{0,0}$ is trivial and $W={\Gamma }_{2,1}$ has dimension $15$. HenceIt remains to find the irreducible representations in the symmetric square of the sl3 representation of highest weight (2,1). We give the formal character calculation explicitly.

Let $E={\mathbb{C}}^3$ be the defining special linear Lie algebra representation. In Dynkin labels, its weights are $(1,0)$, $(-1,1)$, and $(0,-1)$; the dual representation has their negatives. The equivariant contractionis surjective. Its kernel has dimension $18-3=15$. The tensor $e_1^2\otimes e_3^{\ast }$ is a highest-weight vector of highest weight $(2,1)$ in that kernel. By the Weyl complete reducibility theorem, the kernel contains the irreducible representation ${\Gamma }_{2,1}$, whose Weyl dimension formula gives dimension $15$; therefore the kernel equals ${\Gamma }_{2,1}$. This yieldsMultiplying the six weights of $S^{2}E$ by the three weights of $E^{\ast }$ and subtracting those of $E$ gives the following full weight multiplicity list:The multiplicities sum to $9+2\cdot 3=15$.

For any finite-dimensional weight-space decomposition, a weight $\mu$ of multiplicity $m_{\mu }$ contributes $m_{\mu }(m_{\mu }+1)/2$ to weight $2\mu$ in its symmetric square. Distinct weights $\mu ,\nu$ contribute $m_{\mu }{m}_{\nu }$ to $\mu +\nu$. Equivalently,Applying this to the displayed list gives all dominant weight multiplicities in the second column below. The remaining columns are the weight multiplicities of the candidate irreducible representations:For an explicit way to compute each irreducible column, set $z_1{z}_2{z}_3=1$ and use the Weyl character formula in the formA monomial $z_1^{n_1}{z}_2^{n_2}{z}_3^{n_3}$ has Dynkin labels $(n_1-n_2,n_2-n_3)$. Equivalently, the quotient is enumerated by Semistandard Young tableaux of shape $(a+b,b)$ with entries $1,2,3$, weakly increasing across rows and strictly increasing down columns; the exponents count the three entries.

The five irreducible columns sum to the $S^{2}W$ column. These are all its dominant weights, and all five candidate characters have no other dominant weights. Every Weyl group orbit meets the dominant chamber, and weight multiplicities are constant on Weyl group orbits. Thus the table proves equality of the full formal characters, and the Weyl complete reducibility theorem givesThe Weyl dimension formula checks the result:Consequently the requested decomposition isIts total dimension is $1+15+120=136=16\cdot 17/2$.

For an increasing chain of finite groups $G_1\subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n$, regard every $\mathbb{C}{G}_r$ as a subalgebra of $\mathbb{C}{G}_n$. The Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra is the unital algebra generated by their centres:For this paper the chain is $S_1\subseteq \cdots \subseteq S_n$, so these centres are $Z_1,\dots ,Z_n$. The generators commute: if $r\le s$, an element of $Z_s$ commutes with all of $\mathbb{C}{S}_s$, including $Z_r$. Thus the Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra is commutative. Its joint eigenspaces record successive choices in the restriction of an irreducible representation down the chain.

For $\alpha ,\beta \in \mathrm{Spec}(n)$, define $\alpha \sim \beta$ when their Gelfand–Tsetlin basis lines occur in the same irreducible representation. This is well defined: $G{Z}_n$ contains the centre of $\mathbb{C}{S}_n$, whose primitive central idempotents separate the irreducible modules, and part 1(ii) says these central elements are polynomials in the $X_j$. Consequently the same weight cannot label two different irreducible modules.

For content vectors of standard Young tableaux, an admissible adjacent swap of a standard Young tableau exchanges coordinates $i,i+1$ whose difference has absolute value greater than $1$. Define $\alpha \approx \beta$ as the equivalence relation generated by such swaps within $\mathrm{Cont}(n)$.

Equivalently, after reconstructing the tableaux, $\alpha \approx \beta$ means that the two tableaux have the same final Young diagram. Indeed, an admissible swap exchanges consecutive entries in incomparable cells, preserves the diagram and leaves a standard Young tableau. Conversely, tableaux of a fixed shape are linear extensions of a partially ordered set, with the cells ordered by their row and column requirements; any two linear extensions are connected by adjacent swaps of incomparable elements. We explain this connectivity and its spectral consequence in part (v).

Since $X_1=0$, every joint weight has $a_1=0$. In $S_2$, $X_2=(12)$ acts by $1$ on the trivial representation and by $-1$ on the sign representation, which exhaust the irreducible representations. ThusThe content vector of a standard Young tableau conditions similarly require the second coordinate to be a neighbour of $0$, soThese vectors correspond respectively to the single-row tableau of shape $(2)$ and the single-column tableau of shape $(1,1)$.

Use the tableau representation supplied by Young seminormal form, stated explicitly in Question 5, or its normalized Young orthogonal form. It constructs the complex Specht module $S^{\lambda }$ with one basis vector for each standard Young tableau of shape $\lambda$. Its adjacent-transposition matrices imply the content eigenvalues directly.

Indeed, start with $X_1=0$ and use $X_{i+1}=s_i{X}_i{s}_i+s_i$. On an admissible pair $T,R=s_{i}T$, set $a=c_T(i)$, $b=c_T(i+1)$, $d=b-a$, and $q=\sqrt{1-d^{-2}}$. In the orthogonal basis, $X_i$ is $\mathrm{diag}(a,b)$ andMultiplication givesFor a nonadmissible swap, $s_i=\pm 1$ and the next content differs by the same $\pm 1$, giving the same conclusion. Induction therefore proves $X_i{w}_T=c_T(i)w_T$. Every content vector of a standard Young tableau, reconstructed as a standard Young tableau in part (iv), is consequently a spectral weight. Together with the reverse inclusion,

An admissible adjacent swap has nonzero off-diagonal coefficient in Young orthogonal form, and the local spectral calculation in part (i) keeps it inside one irreducible representation. Thus $\alpha \approx \beta$ implies $\alpha \sim \beta$.

Two standard Young tableaux of one shape are connected by admissible swaps. Regard each as a linear extension of a partially ordered set of cells. Move the first cell of the desired extension to the front of the other extension: every cell it crosses is incomparable with it, since otherwise their order would be forced in both extensions. Repeat after fixing that first cell. Each step swaps consecutive labels in incomparable cells. Such cells lie strictly northeast and southwest of each other, so their contents differ by at least $2$ in absolute value. These are exactly admissible swaps.

This also establishes irreducibility of the constructed tableau representations. A submodule is invariant under the commuting $X_j$ and hence under their joint spectral projections; since their weights are distinct, it is a sum of tableau lines. A nonzero off-diagonal coefficient propagates any included line along every admissible edge, and connectivity then includes all lines. Different shapes give nonisomorphic modules, since their content-vector sets are disjoint and content reconstruction determines the shape. Finally, the Robinson–Schensted correspondence gives ${\sum }_{\lambda ⊢n}{f}_{\lambda }^2=n!$, and the sum of squares of irreducible degrees leaves room for no other irreducible representations.

Thus within each irreducible module the weights are exactly the tableaux of one shape, so $\alpha \sim \beta$ implies $\alpha \approx \beta$. Hence the two equivalence relations coincide.