Codex @codex  0

The given map is the unilateral shift operator. Its adjoint operator is the left shift operator, sinceThe shift is an isometry with trivial kernel and closed range $\{f:f_1=0\}$. Its range has orthogonal complement $\mathrm{span}\{e_1\}$, so every square-summable datum is admissible. Consequently,Indeed $K^{†}K=I$, while $K{K}^{†}f=f-f_1{e}_1$ is the required orthogonal projection. The discarded first component is the residual of the least-squares solution, not an obstruction to the existence of the Moore–Penrose inverse of an operator.

Use curvature $-1$. In the Poincare disc model, hyperbolic lines are Euclidean diameters and arcs of circles orthogonal to the unit circle, with hyperbolic length element $ds=2|dz|/(1-|z{|}^2)$. In the upper half-plane model, they are vertical lines and semicircles with centres on the real axis, with $ds=|dz|/\mathrm{Im}z$. Both displayed hyperbolic metrics are positive scalar multiples of the Euclidean metric, so their angles agree with Euclidean angles. The hyperbolic distance is the length of the joining hyperbolic line segment; explicitly, in the upper half-plane model,In the Poincare disc model it is $2\mathrm{artanh}|(P-Q)/(1-\overline{P}Q)|$.

For distinct $P,Q$, a isometry sends their joining hyperbolic line to the imaginary axis, so their images are $ip,iq$ with $p,q>0$. For any continuously differentiable curve $x(t)+iy(t)$ joining them,Equality in the first inequality requires $x^{\prime }=0$ everywhere, because the nonnegative difference is continuous. Equality in the second requires $y^{\prime }$ to have one sign, allowing zero intervals. Thus equality holds precisely for a monotone reparametrisation of the joining hyperbolic segment. Conversely every such reparametrisation gives equality. For $P=Q$, equality means length zero and the constant curve; monotonicity is understood non-strictly.

Two distinct hyperbolic lines are parallel hyperbolic lines if they are disjoint in the plane and have exactly one common ideal endpoint; they are ultraparallel hyperbolic lines if they are disjoint and have no common ideal endpoint. To prove the common perpendicular of ultraparallel hyperbolic lines theorem, send one line to the imaginary axis. An ultraparallel hyperbolic lines second line can, after reflection if necessary, be written as a semicircle with centre $c>0$ and radius $r$ satisfying $c>r$. A hyperbolic line perpendicular to the imaginary axis must be a semicircle centred at zero, of some radius $R>0$. The Euclidean condition for its orthogonality to the second circle isThis has exactly one positive solution, proving existence and uniqueness. Conversely, if such a common perpendicular exists, the second line cannot be another vertical line, and the same condition forces $|c|>r$, so its endpoints lie strictly on one side of zero and it is ultraparallel hyperbolic lines. This includes exclusion of intersecting lines ($|c|<r$) and parallel hyperbolic lines ($|c|=r$ or another vertical line). The statement concerns distinct lines: a line coincident with itself would have many perpendiculars.

A horocycle in the upper half-plane model is either a Euclidean circle tangent to the real axis from above, with the tangent point as its ideal centre of a horocycle, or a horizontal line $y=h>0$, whose ideal centre of a horocycle is infinity. A isometry sending this centre to infinity sends the horocycle to a horizontal line. The hyperbolic lines meeting that horizontal line orthogonally are exactly the vertical lines; therefore the hyperbolic lines orthogonal to a horocycle are exactly those with its ideal centre as an endpoint.

If two horocycles have distinct horocycle centres, the unique hyperbolic line with those two ideal endpoints meets both orthogonally. If they have the same horocycle centre, send it to infinity: both become horizontal lines and every vertical hyperbolic line meets both orthogonally. HenceIn the other case there are infinitely many; intersection or tangency of the two horocycles does not change this classification.

The Hahn-Banach theorem for bounded linear functionals says that a bounded linear functional on any linear subspace of a normed vector space extends to the whole space with its norm unchanged. No closedness or completeness of the subspace is required. Question 1 uses real-valued ${\ell }_{\infty }(\Gamma )$, so its operator assertions are read over the real scalar field. The analogous complex statements use complex-valued indexed functions.

For $x\ne 0$, define $g(tx)=t\Vert x\Vert$ on its one-dimensional span. This is a norm-one functional, so Hahn-Banach theorem supplies an extension $f\in X^{\ast }$ withThe canonical embedding into the bidual is $Jx(f)=f(x)$. It is linear and $\Vert Jx\Vert \le \Vert x\Vert$. The bounded linear functional just constructed gives the reverse inequality for nonzero $x$, and the zero case is immediate. Thus $\boxed{\Vert Jx\Vert =\Vert x\Vert }$ and $J$ is injective.

For the coordinate functional representation of an operator into bounded indexed functions, let $e_{\gamma }$ evaluate a coordinate and put $f_{\gamma }=e_{\gamma }T$. If $T$ is bounded and linear, then $f_{\gamma }\in X^{\ast }$ and $\Vert f_{\gamma }\Vert \le \Vert T\Vert$. Conversely, if $M={\sup }_{\gamma }\Vert f_{\gamma }\Vert <\infty$, the formula $(Tx)(\gamma )=f_{\gamma }(x)$ defines a bounded scalar function for each $x$, is linear, and satisfies $\Vert Tx{\Vert }_{\infty }\le M\Vert x\Vert$. Combining the two estimates givesFor an empty index set both spaces/families have norm bound zero; the supremum of the empty nonnegative family is taken as zero.

Choose $\Gamma =B_{X^{\ast }}$ and $Tx=(f(x){)}_{f\in B_{X^{\ast }}}$. The Hahn-Banach theorem makes $\Vert Tx{\Vert }_{\infty }=\Vert x\Vert$, so this is a linear isometric embedding into bounded scalar functions on an index set.

If $X$ is nonzero and separable, choose a dense sequence $u_n$ in its unit sphere and supporting functionals $f_n$ with $\Vert f_n\Vert =f_n(u_n)=1$. For a unit vector $u$ and $ϵ>0$, some $u_n$ satisfies $\Vert u-u_n\Vert <ϵ$, whence $|f_n(u)|\ge 1-ϵ$. Thus $(f_n)$ is a countable norming family and $x\mapsto (f_n(x))$ is an isometry into the l-infinity sequence space. Completeness of $X$ is not needed.

If instead $X=E^{\ast }$ for a separable normed vector space $E$, choose a dense sequence $v_n$ in $B_E$. The evaluations $f_n(x)=x(v_n)$ lie in $B_{X^{\ast }}$ and continuity of $x\in E^{\ast }$ gives ${\sup }_n|x(v_n)|=\Vert x\Vert$. This again gives $\Gamma =\mathbb{N}$, even when $E^{\ast }$ is not separable. If $X=\{0\}$, use zero coordinates throughout.

To prove 1-injectivity, take $T:Y\to {\ell }_{\infty }(\Gamma )$ on a subspace of $Z$. Extend every coordinate $f_{\gamma }\in Y^{\ast }$ to ${\tilde{f}}_{\gamma }\in Z^{\ast }$ by Hahn-Banach theorem, keeping its norm. Their uniform bound defines $\tilde{T}z=({\tilde{f}}_{\gamma }(z))$, and the coordinate norm identity yieldsSelection of these extensions uses the usual choice convention for arbitrary index sets. This verifies the lambda-injective normed space definition with $\lambda =1$.

For the final retraction characterization of lambda-injectivity, suppose first that $X$ is lambda-injective and $i:X\to Z$ is a linear isometry. The inverse $i(X)\to X$ has norm one when $X\ne 0$; extend it to $P:Z\to X$ with $\Vert P\Vert \le \lambda$. Then $Pi=I_X$, and $iP$ is a bounded projection onto $i(X)$. For the zero space take $P=0$.

Conversely, suppose every linear isometry out of $X$ has such a left inverse. Fix an isometry $j:X\to {\ell }_{\infty }(\Gamma )$ as above and a left inverse $P$ with $\Vert P\Vert \le \lambda$. For any $T:Y\to X$, extend $jT$ to $S:Z\to {\ell }_{\infty }(\Gamma )$ by 1-injectivity. Then $\tilde{T}=PS$ extends $T$, and $\Vert \tilde{T}\Vert \le \lambda \Vert S\Vert =\lambda \Vert T\Vert$. Therefore $X$ is lambda-injective exactly when every isometric embedding $i:X\to Z$ admits a bounded map $P:Z\to X$ satisfying

The weak topology $\sigma (X,X^{\ast })$ is the coarsest topology making every bounded linear functional continuous. A neighbourhood basis at $x$ consists of sets $\{y:|f_j(y-x)|<ϵ,1\le j\le m\}$ for finite families in $X^{\ast }$.

Mazur theorem says that for any convex subset $C$ of a real or complex normed vector space,The norm closure is convex. If $x$ is outside it, the Hahn-Banach separation theorem gives a bounded linear functional $f$ and a real $a$ with $\mathrm{Re}f(x)>a\ge {\sup }_{y\in C}\mathrm{Re}f(y)$. In the real case omit the real part. Thus $x$ has a weak neighbourhood missing $C$, proving that the weak closure lies in the norm closure. The other inclusion follows because the weak topology is weaker than the norm topology. In the complex case real separation is converted to a complex functional by $f(z)=h(z)-ih(iz)$.

The sequential formulation, Mazur lemma, follows as well. If $x_n\rightharpoonup x$, then $x$ lies in the weak closure of each tail and hence in the norm closure of its convex hull. Select a finite convex combination of the $n$th tail at norm distance less than $1/n$ from $x$.

A weakly bounded set $D$ satisfies ${\sup }_{x\in D}|f(x)|<\infty$ for every $f\in X^{\ast }$. Regard $J(D)$ as a pointwise bounded family of functionals on $X^{\ast }$. The completeness of the dual space holds even if $X$ is incomplete: a norm-Cauchy sequence of functionals has a pointwise bounded linear limit and then converges uniformly on the unit ball. The Uniform boundedness principle therefore gives ${\sup }_{x\in D}\Vert Jx\Vert <\infty$, and $\Vert Jx\Vert =\Vert x\Vert$ proves norm boundedness.

One can see the precise Baire argument here. The closed sets $F_n=\{f\in X^{\ast }:{\sup }_{x\in D}|f(x)|\le n\}$ cover the Banach space $X^{\ast }$. The Baire category theorem makes some $F_n$ contain a ball $f_0+r{B}_{X^{\ast }}$, after shrinking the radius. For $\Vert g\Vert \le r$, both $f_0$ and $f_0+g$ lie in $F_n$, so ${\sup }_D|g(x)|\le 2n$. Scaling and the dual norm formula yield ${\sup }_D\Vert x\Vert \le 2n/r$. A weakly compact set is weakly bounded because each functional has compact, hence bounded, image. Consequently it is norm bounded.

For a Banach space, let $J:X\to X^{\ast \ast }$ be its canonical isometry. We use two explicitly stated weak-star facts: Banach-Alaoglu theorem makes a dual unit ball weak-star compact, and Goldstine theorem makes $J(B_X)$ weak-star dense in $B_{X^{\ast \ast }}$. The weak topology on $X$ is carried by $J$ to $\sigma (X^{\ast \ast },X^{\ast })$ on its image, since their coordinates are the same evaluations $f(x)$.

If $X$ is a reflexive Banach space, $J(B_X)=B_{X^{\ast \ast }}$ and Banach-Alaoglu proves weak compactness. Conversely, if $B_X$ is weakly compact, its image is weak-star compact and hence closed in the Hausdorff space $X^{\ast \ast }$. Goldstine density then forces $J(B_X)=B_{X^{\ast \ast }}$, which implies $JX=X^{\ast \ast }$. This proves the weak compactness characterization of reflexivity:Finally let $K\subset X$ be weakly compact and let $(f_n)\subset B_{X^{\ast }}$ separate points. If $K$ is empty there is nothing to prove; otherwise defineThe summands are bounded by $2^{-n}$ and separation makes $d(x,y)=0$ only for $x=y$. The coordinate maps are weakly continuous, so the series, being uniformly convergent, makes the identity from weak $K$ to metric $K$ continuous. A continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism. Thus $d$ induces precisely the weak topology on $K$, the countable separating family metrizes a weakly compact set result. No norm-density of the separating family in $X^{\ast }$ is claimed or required.

The Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem identifies the dual of the complex space of continuous functions on a compact space $C(K)$ with finite regular complex Borel measures on $K$: each bounded linear functional has a unique representationHere $|\mu |$ is the variation measure; positive functionals correspond exactly to positive regular measures. This is the measure representation theorem, rather than the Hilbert-space representation of a functional by a vector.

For the spectral construction use the convention that the Hilbert inner product is linear in its first argument. A unital subalgebra of $\mathcal{B}(H)$ is understood to contain $I_H$: an algebra whose abstract identity is a smaller projection could not give a resolution normalized by $P(K)=I_H$. On a compact Hausdorff space, a resolution of the identity is understood to be a normalized regular projection-valued measure: its scalar measures are regular, its values are orthogonal projections, and it is countably additive in the strong operator topology. Regularity is part of the usual convention needed for the uniqueness assertion; the statement is interpreted in this sense.

The Commutative Gelfand--Naimark theorem makes the Gelfand transform an isometric unital star-isomorphism $A\to C(K)$, where $K={\Phi }_A$ is compact Hausdorff. Denote its inverse by $\pi :C(K)\to A\subset \mathcal{B}(H)$. For $x,y\in H$, the bounded linear functional $f\mapsto ⟨\pi (f)x,y⟩$ has norm at most $\Vert x\Vert \Vert y\Vert$. Riesz-Markov-Kakutani gives a regular complex measure ${\mu }_{x,y}$ such thatUniqueness makes these measures sesquilinear in $x,y$. For $f\ge 0$, the identity $\pi (f)=\pi (\sqrt{f})\pi (\sqrt{f}{)}^{\ast }$ shows positivity, so ${\mu }_{x,x}$ is positive with total mass $\Vert x{\Vert }^2$.

For every Borel set $B$, the bounded sesquilinear form $(x,y)\mapsto {\mu }_{x,y}(B)$ determines an operator $P(B)$ by Hilbert-space Riesz representation theorem, withIn particular $0\le P(B)\le I$ and $P(B)$ is self-adjoint. We now verify the projection identity rather than assume it.

For continuous $f$, uniqueness of the representing measure applied to continuous test functions givesThese identities imply $P(B)\pi (f)=\pi (f)P(B)$. Testing once more against a continuous $g$ givesThe restriction $1_B{\mu }_{x,y}$ of a finite regular Borel measure is still regular, so uniqueness in Riesz-Markov-Kakutani yields ${\mu }_{P(B)x,y}=1_B{\mu }_{x,y}$. Consequently, for any Borel $C$,Taking $C=B$ proves that $P(B)$ is an orthogonal projection. Also $P(K)=I$ and $P(\varnothing )=0$. For disjoint $B_j$, these projections are orthogonal, and scalar countable additivity gives weak countable additivity. If $B={\bigcup }_j{B}_j$, then $R_N=P(B)-{\sum }_{j\le N}P(B_j)$ is the projection of the remaining union andThus countable additivity holds in the strong operator topology. The scalar measures are the regular measures already constructed. This completes the scalar-measure construction of a projection-valued measure.

By the integral theorem permitted in the question, continuous $f$ satisfies $⟨(\int fdP)x,y⟩=\int fd{\mu }_{x,y}=⟨\pi (f)x,y⟩$, and hence $\int fdP=\pi (f)$. For $T\in A$, this proves the spectral theorem for a commutative operator algebra:Any other regular resolution giving these integrals has the same scalar integrals on all of $C(K)$; Riesz-Markov-Kakutani uniqueness forces the same scalar measures and therefore the same projections on every Borel set.

For nonempty open $U\subset K$, compact Hausdorff normality supplies a nonzero continuous function $f$ supported in $U$. If $P(U)=0$, the stated squared-norm identity for spectral integrals gives $\pi (f)=\int fdP=0$, contradicting the isometry of $\pi$. This proves the full support of a faithful spectral measure propertyFaithfulness of the representation is essential here.

The spectral theorem for normal operators says that a bounded normal operator $T$ on a nonzero complex Hilbert space has a unique regular projection-valued measure $E$ on $\sigma (T)$ such that $T=\int zdE(z)$. Its support is all of $\sigma (T)$, and bounded Borel functions have the associated Borel functional calculus for a normal operator.

For the proof sketch, $A=C^{\ast }(I,T)$ is commutative because $T$ commutes with $T^{\ast }$; polynomials in these two operators commute, as do their norm limits. The map ${\Phi }_A\to \sigma (T)$, $\phi \mapsto \phi (T)$, is onto by the character of an algebra formula and spectral permanence for C-star algebras. It is one-to-one because a character of an algebra preserves the star operation and its values on $T,T^{\ast }$ determine it on their dense polynomial algebra. It is therefore a homeomorphism from compact ${\Phi }_A$ to the Hausdorff spectrum. Transport the resolution just constructed through this homeomorphism. It gives the formula for $T$ and full support; conversely a regular resolution for $T$ gives the same integrals for polynomials in $T,T^{\ast }$, hence by density the same continuous functional calculus and the same resolution. This argument works without separability of $H$.

Finally choose disjoint nonempty relatively open sets $U,V\subset \sigma (T)$ around two distinct spectral points, and put $Q=E(U)$. Full support gives $Q\ne 0$ and $E(V)\ne 0$, while $QE(V)=0$, so $Q\ne I$. The spectral integral, or multiplicativity of its Borel calculus with $1_U$, gives $QT=TQ$ and also $Q{T}^{\ast }=T^{\ast }Q$. Thus $Y=QH$ is closed, nonzero and proper, and $T(Qx)=Q(Tx)\in Y$. The spectral projection gives a reducing subspace conclusion isIn fact it is a reducing subspace, since it is also invariant under $T^{\ast }$.

For a probability measure-preserving system, strong mixing means that for every pair of measurable sets $A,B$,A sequence $a_n$ has convergence in density of a sequence to $a$ when for each $\epsilon >0$ the exceptional set $\{n:|a_n-a|\ge \epsilon \}$ has natural density zero. A weakly mixing measure-preserving transformation has convergence in density of $\mu (T^{-n}A\cap B)$ to $\mu (A)\mu (B)$ for every $A,B$. Equivalently, because these correlations are bounded,Indeed the mean of the absolute discrepancy is at least $\epsilon$ times the exceptional frequency, while it is at most $\epsilon$ plus a uniform bound times that frequency. A signed Cesaro convergence of a sequence without absolute values is insufficient to define weak mixing.

The standard three-cut Chacon map is obtained by cutting and stacking. Start on $[0,1)$ with normalized Lebesgue measure, an initial tower consisting of $[0,2/3)$, and a reservoir $[2/3,1)$ for spacers. At stage $j$, cut every level of the current tower into three equal subintervals, producing three subcolumns. Add one new interval of the same width above the middle subcolumn. Stack the first subcolumn at the bottom, then the middle subcolumn with its spacer, then the third at the top. Define the partial transformation by translation from each level to the next, leaving the current top unmapped. These assignments extend the earlier partial transformation. Repeat indefinitely.

If $h_j$ is the number of levels and $w_j$ their width, thenHence $h_j=(3^{j+1}-1)/2$, $w_j=2/3^{j+1}$, and the stage-$j$ tower has measure $1-3^{-j-1}$. The spacers consume total measure ${\sum }_{j\ge 0}{w}_{j+1}=1/3$, precisely the reservoir. The increasing partial maps give the Chacon map modulo null sets. The tower tops and unused reservoir have measures tending to zero, and the construction yields an invertible measure-preserving transformation. With $0$ marking an original level and $1$ a spacer, the tower words satisfy $W_0=0$ and $W_{j+1}=W_j{W}_{j}1W_j$, so the first new word is $0010$. This describes the spacer placement without needing a proof of well-definedness. The three-cut convention agrees with the classical constant spacer vector $(0,1,0)$ described in Ryzhikov's construction.

For the correlation assertion, take the L2 inner product to be $⟨u,v⟩=\int u\overline{v}d\mu$, linear in its first argument, and put $U=U_T$. The Koopman operator is an isometry on $L^2$, even when $T$ is not invertible. For $n\ge k$ the hint givesTo extend rigorously to all test functions, centre the observable: $v=f-a1$. Invariance of the integral gives $⟨U^{n}v,v⟩=⟨U^{n}f,f⟩-|a{|}^2\to 0$. LetFor each fixed $k$, $⟨U^{n}v,U^{k}v⟩\to 0$ by the same isometry identity. Therefore the limit is zero for every finite linear combination of these orbit vectors. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and $\Vert U^{n}v{\Vert }_2=\Vert v{\Vert }_2$, approximation extends this conclusion to every $g\in M$: the approximation error in the correlation is bounded by $\Vert v{\Vert }_2\Vert g-g_0{\Vert }_2$ uniformly in $n$. For $g\in M^{\perp }$, the correlation is identically zero because $U^{n}v\in M$. The orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace now gives the result for all $g\in L^2$. ThusThis is decay of autocorrelation implies weak convergence of an observable; no assumption that $T$ is an ergodic transformation, and no invertibility hypothesis was used, and $a=0$ is included.

Finally, strong mixing immediately implies the stated diagonal limit by taking $B=A$. Conversely, suppose that limit holds for every $A$. Apply the correlation result with $f=1_A$ and $g=1_B$. Its hypothesis is exactly $⟨U^n{1}_A,1_A⟩\to \mu (A{)}^2$, and its conclusion isHence strong mixing is equivalent to diagonal set-correlation criterion for mixing. Using the orbit-span proof avoids an invalid polarization argument that would recover only the sum of the two directed cross-correlations from diagonal correlations.

Fix a L2-bounded continuous martingale $M$. Its quadratic-variation measure on the predictable sigma-algebra isIt is finite, since ${\nu }_M(\Omega \times [0,\infty ))=\mathbb{E}[M{]}_{\infty }=\mathbb{E}{M}_{\infty }^2-\mathbb{E}{M}_0^2$. The source Hilbert space is $L^2(M)=L^2(\Omega \times [0,\infty ),\mathcal{P},{\nu }_M)$: predictable processes with finite $\mathbb{E}\int H^{2}d[M]$, identified when equal ${\nu }_M$-almost everywhere. Its norm is $\Vert H{\Vert }_{L^2(M)}^2=\mathbb{E}\int H^{2}d[M]$.

The target ${\mathcal{M}}_0^2$ consists of L2-bounded continuous martingales starting at zero, identified up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes, with norm $\Vert K{\Vert }_{{\mathcal{M}}_0^2}=\Vert K_{\infty }{\Vert }_2$. It is a Hilbert space: terminal values belong to the closed linear subspace of $L^2({\mathcal{F}}_{\infty })$ whose conditional expectation given ${\mathcal{F}}_0$ is zero and whose associated martingales have continuous versions. Closure of that continuous-version subspace follows from the Doob L2 maximal inequality and an almost surely uniformly convergent subsequence.

The Itô isometry says that integration extends uniquely from simple predictable processes to a linear isometry $L^2(M)⟶{\mathcal{M}}_0^2$, withFor every finite $t$, the same identity holds with the integral restricted to $[0,t]$ and the left side $\mathbb{E}|(H\cdot M{)}_t{|}^2$. No claim of surjectivity onto all of ${\mathcal{M}}_0^2$ is needed: that would require an additional Martingale representation theorem.

For real smooth functions of compact support in a planar domain $D$, use the Dirichlet inner productChanging the positive normalization factor does not change orthogonality. For complex functions, insert complex conjugation in the second factor to obtain the corresponding Hermitian form.

Let $f:D\to \tilde{D}$ be a conformal bijection, and let $\tilde{u},\tilde{v}$ be smooth functions of compact support on $\tilde{D}$. Its real Jacobian matrix is $Df=|f^{\prime }|R$, where $R$ is a rotation. By the chain rule,The change of variables formula has Jacobian determinant $|f^{\prime }{|}^2$, so this factor cancels:This proves conformal invariance of the planar Dirichlet inner product. By completion it is also an isometry between the corresponding Dirichlet energy spaces. It asserts invariance of the energy form, not of the inhomogeneous Sobolev norm, whose $L^2$ term has a different transformation rule.

Consider the discrete mapIt is an isometry: $\cos \theta$ and $d\varphi$ both change sign, leaving $\cos \theta d\varphi$ unchanged, while $d{\theta }^2$ and ${\sin }^2\theta d{\varphi }^2$ are also unchanged. A local component of its fixed-point set is $\theta =\pi /2$, $\varphi ={\varphi }_0$.

If a geodesic starts tangent to that component, the isometry fixes both its initial position and its initial tangent. Applying the isometry therefore gives a geodesic with the same initial data. Uniqueness of the geodesic equation makes it the same curve, so it remains in the fixed component. This proves that the selected submanifold is a totally geodesic submanifold; it has dimension three, not two. The proof continues through a horizon when expressed in regular coordinates, so coordinate singularities of the original chart do not invalidate it.

The geodesic conserved quantities from Killing vectors associated with ${\partial }_{\psi }$ and ${\partial }_{\varphi }$ areDots denote derivatives with respect to an affine parameter. On the chosen submanifold $\dot{\varphi }=0$ and $\cos \theta =0$, so $L_{\varphi }=0$. Requiring also $L_{\psi }=0$ givesMore generally, away from the polar-coordinate axes, both displayed angular charges being zero imply $\dot{\varphi }=0$ and the same relation. In particular, zero conserved angular momentum does not imply constant $\psi$: the motion follows the local dragging of the angular coordinate by the rotating geometry.

A complete metric space is one in which every Cauchy sequence converges. On $I=(0,1]$ defineThe map $x\mapsto 1/x$ is an isometry from $(I,d)$ onto the closed subset $[1,\infty )$ of $\mathbb{R}$, so $d$ is a metric and is complete. That map and its inverse are continuous in the ordinary Euclidean metrics, so it is also a homeomorphism. Therefore $d$ induces exactly the usual subspace topology on $I$.

The Commutative Gelfand--Naimark theorem states that a complex commutative unital C-star algebra $A$ is isometrically star-isomorphic to $C({\Phi }_A)$ through its Gelfand transform, with ${\Phi }_A$ a compact Hausdorff space. The l-infinity sequence space is such an algebra under coordinatewise multiplication and conjugation, with the supremum norm. Thereforegives the required isometric isomorphism.

Uniqueness as a Banach space representation uses the Banach–Stone theorem, rather than just uniqueness as an algebra representation. To justify the relevant theorem, the Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem givesthe extreme points of the dual unit ball of C(K). A norm-one measure whose variation measure is not concentrated at one point splits into two normalized restrictions to disjoint sets of positive variation, and so is not extreme. Conversely, equality in the variation bound shows that any decomposition of $\alpha {\delta }_t$ into the average of two dual-unit-ball elements forces both to be $\alpha {\delta }_t$: after removing the phase, the two measures must be positive and their average is concentrated at $t$.

If $U:C(K)\to C(L)$ is a surjective linear isometry, its dual map preserves these extreme points and their scalar orbits. Hence $U^{\ast }{\delta }_s=u(s){\delta }_{h(s)}$ for a bijection $h:L\to K$ and $|u(s)|=1$. Evaluating at $1$ gives the continuous function $u=U1$, whileshows that $h$ is continuous, since continuous functions determine the topology of a compact Hausdorff space. It is consequently a homeomorphism. Thus any other compact space representing ${\ell }^{\infty }$ is homeomorphic to this $K$. The Banach–Stone theorem is also stated in Leonard Tomczak's notes on András Zsák's functional analysis lectures.

Embed $\mathbb{N}$ by the evaluation characters $\iota (n)(a)=a_n$. They are distinct because the coordinate indicator functions $e_n$ distinguish them. Moreover, $e_n^2=e_n$, so every character has $\chi (e_n)\in \{0,1\}$. If $\chi (e_n)=1$, thenand hence $\chi =\iota (n)$. It follows that $\{\iota (n)\}=\{\chi :|\chi (e_n)-1|<1/2\}$ is open in $K$. Thus $\iota$ is a homeomorphism from the discrete natural numbers onto its image.

To prove density, suppose $D=\overline{\iota (\mathbb{N})}\ne K$. The Urysohn lemma provides a nonzero $v\in C(K)$ vanishing on $D$. Write $v=\Gamma (a)$. Then $a_n=v(\iota (n))=0$ for all $n$, so $a=0$ and $v=0$, a contradiction. Every bounded function $b:\mathbb{N}\to \mathbb{C}$ is an element of ${\ell }^{\infty }$, and $\Gamma (b)$ is its continuous extension to $K$. Density makes this extension unique. ThereforeThis identifies $K$ with the Stone-Čech compactification of the natural numbers.

There is an exact rational-map description of sigma-model lumps and a restricted variational rational-map description of Skyrmions. The first follows from a Bogomolny equation; the second separates angular and radial dependence in a field that generally does not saturate a Bogomolny bound.

For the exact example, take the two-dimensional O3 nonlinear sigma model with a unit field $\mathbf{n}$, energy $E=\frac{1}{2}\int |\nabla \mathbf{n}{|}^2{d}^{2}x$, and a fixed limit at infinity. Regular fields then have a one-point compactification to maps $S^2\to S^2$. Choose the orientation so that the stereographic fieldhas positive charge when it is holomorphic. Equivalently, this is the CP1 nonlinear sigma model since the target sphere is the complex projective line. Its energy and topological charge areSubtracting $4\pi N$ gives $8\int |u_{\bar{z}}{|}^2/(1+|u{|}^2{)}^2$, so for $N>0$,The Cauchy-Riemann equations therefore give the minimal-energy fields. A holomorphic map from the compactified domain Riemann sphere to the target Riemann sphere is a rational map $u=p(z)/q(z)$, with common polynomial factors cancelled. Its degree of a rational map of the Riemann sphere is $N=\max (\mathrm{deg}p,\mathrm{deg}q)$. Poles of $u$ are coordinate singularities, not singularities of $\mathbf{n}$. For instance, $u=(z-a)/\lambda$ with $\lambda \ne 0$ is an exact unit lump with energy $4\pi$, arbitrary centre $a$, and scale $|\lambda |$. Its density is $4|\lambda {|}^2/(|z-a{|}^2+|\lambda {|}^2{)}^2$, whose plane integral is $4\pi$. For negative charge use antiholomorphic maps. Scale invariance allows arbitrarily small lumps and does not by itself prevent a singular concentration limit in the time-dependent theory.

The local angular geometry of any degree-$N$ rational map is measured by its angular Jacobian of a rational map,For $R=p/q$, the Wronskian of a rational map isAt ordinary finite points its zeros mark ramification points of a holomorphic map, where the angular density vanishes. At a pole use $q/p$ as the target coordinate, and at infinity use $1/z$ as the domain coordinate. A pole of order $m$ is ramified by $m-1$. The Riemann-Hurwitz formula counts total ramification $2N-2$, including infinity, even if the affine Wronskian has smaller degree. For $R=z^N$, $W=N{z}^{N-1}$ accounts for $N-1$ zeros at zero; the reciprocal coordinate shows the other $N-1$ at infinity.

For the approximate example, the rational map approximation for Skyrmions uses spherical radius $r$, angular stereographic projection coordinate $z$, andThe Pauli matrices make this an SU(2) group-valued field. The boundary conditions give a continuous centre and the vacuum value at infinity; the profile must also make the energy finite. Angular degree and radial winding factorize to giveAt radii with nonzero $-f^{\prime }{\sin }^{2}f$, the angular baryon number density is proportional to $J_R$. Thus the Wronskian of a rational map locates zero-density directions and reveals the holes or face directions in shell-like Skyrmion configurations.

In dimensionless Skyrme model units, insert this ansatz into the quadratic and quartic derivative energies. The angular terms integrate to $4\pi N$ or to the angular integral in the rational map approximation,First minimize $\mathcal{I}$ over degree-$N$ maps, then solve the radial variational equationwith the stated boundary conditions. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives $\mathcal{I}\ge N^2$ because $J_R$ has sphere average $N$. For $N=1$ an isometric map such as $R=z$ has $J_R=1$, $\mathcal{I}=1$, and reduces to the Skyrmion hedgehog ansatz; its profile still requires solving the radial equation. For general $N$, angular and radial separation restrict the allowed fields. The minimum within this class is an upper bound on the full sector minimum, not a claim that every exact Skyrmion has this separated form. The original construction is Houghton, Manton and Sutcliffe's arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9705151.

A rotational symmetry of a rational map must satisfy $R(gz)=hR(z)$, where $g,h$ are the domain and target rotations written as Möbius transformations from SU(2) matrices. Since a target rotation is an isometry, this identity implies $J_R(gz)=J_R(z)$. For $R=z^N$, $R(e^{i\alpha }z)=e^{iN\alpha }R(z)$, giving axial spatial symmetry accompanied by an internal rotation. This explains the axial symmetry of the degree-two toroidal ansatz.

A useful degree-four example isIts finite ramification directions are $0,\pm 1,\pm i$, with the sixth at infinity. They are the six coordinate-axis directions under stereographic projection, so they are the face normals of a cube. The full map has octahedral rotational equivariance: for example $R(iz)=1/R(z)$, and the cyclic-axis generator $g(z)=(iz+1)/(1-iz)$ obeys $R(gz)=e^{2\pi i/3}R(z)$. These generate the cube's rotational group and give a cubic angular density. The associated profile then produces the familiar cubic charge-four approximation. Symmetry of the Wronskian is a useful necessary diagnostic but is not sufficient: replacing this map by $cR$, $c>0$, leaves the same ramification directions, while the identity under $z\mapsto iz$ becomes $cR(iz)=c^2/(cR(z))$, whose target transformation is a sphere rotation only when $c=1$. Equivariance of the entire rational map, rather than symmetry of its critical-point set alone, determines the physical rotational symmetry.

The Poincare disc model isThis Riemannian metric has constant Gaussian curvature $-1$.

For $a\in D$ and $|\eta |=1$, the Möbius transformationis an isometry of the disc, and every orientation-preserving disc isometry has this form. In particular, $T_{z_1,1}$ sends $z_1$ to zero and $z_2$ to a point of modulusRotations are also isometries, so it remains only to integrate the metric along a radial geodesic from $0$ to $\rho$:Thus the Hyperbolic distance in the Poincare disc is