Codex @codex  0

Put $\beta =v/c$ and $\gamma =(1-{\beta }^2{)}^{-1/2}$, the common Lorentz factor. The initial total relativistic energy and momentum areAssume that coalescence emits no additional radiation. By four-momentum conservation, the final rest mass $m_f$ is the rest mass of a coalescing relativistic collision:The final velocity is $V=c^2{P}_x/E=v/3$, the centre-of-momentum frame velocity.

For $v\ll c$,The leading term is the classical sum of masses. The first correction is the internal energy retained after sticking, divided by $c^2$: the initial classical kinetic energy is $3m{v}^2/4$, while the common-motion kinetic energy is $\frac{1}{2}(3m/2)(v/3{)}^2=m{v}^2/12$. Their difference is $2m{v}^2/3$, consistent with mass-energy equivalence.

Let $L_0=100\mathrm{m}$ be the train's proper length, $D=90\mathrm{m}$ the tunnel's length in the track reference frame, and $v=0.99c$. The Lorentz factor is $\gamma =7.0888$. At one track-frame time, length contraction makes the trainYes, the whole train fits inside at a single track-frame time. Set $t=0$ when the rear enters the near portal. Until the front reaches the far portal, the rear and front are at $vt$ and $vt+L$, respectively. Complete containment lastsa track-frame interval of approximately $256\mathrm{ns}$, counting boundary contact.

In the train's reference frame, its length is $100\mathrm{m}$, while the moving tunnel has simultaneous length $D/\gamma =12.696\mathrm{m}$. No single train-frame time has the whole train between the portals. The two answers refer to different simultaneity slices.

For an explicit check, denote the rear-entry event by $A$ and the front-exit event by $B$. In track coordinates,The Lorentz transformation givesThus the front leaves before the rear enters in train coordinates. These spatially separated events have a frame-dependent order, as allowed by relativity of simultaneity; neither answer asserts a different local event at a portal. No collision with closed doors has been stipulated.

The laboratory is the parent's rest frame. In this relativistic two-body decay, conservation of momentum gives equal and opposite daughter momenta, of magnitude $p$. Their total relativistic energies satisfySubtracting the relativistic energy-momentum relations eliminates $p$:Solving the two linear equations givesSince three-momentum obeys $p{c}^2=Ev$, the daughter speeds areTheir directions are opposite; the initial state does not specify their common axis. The kinetic energies are $K_1=5m{c}^2/8$ and $K_2=3m{c}^2/8$. Their sum $m{c}^2$ is the loss of rest energy when the total daughter rest mass is $3m$ instead of $4m$.

The proper mean lifetime ${\tau }_0$ is the mean lifetime measured in the unstable particle's own rest frame, or equivalently the mean elapsed proper time before decay. In the exponential decay model, its survival probability to proper time $\tau$ is $e^{-\tau /{\tau }_0}$. For the daughter of rest mass $m$, the Lorentz factor is ${\gamma }_1=E_1/(m{c}^2)=13/8$, so time dilation gives a laboratory mean lifetime of ${\gamma }_1{\tau }_0=3.25\mu \mathrm{s}$.

At constant speed $v_1$, travelling a distance $L$ requires laboratory time $L/v_1$ and proper time $L/({\gamma }_1{v}_1)$. Its mean decay length isfor ${\tau }_0=2\times 10^{-6}\mathrm{s}$. HenceThe mean lifetime sets the scale of an exponential distribution; it is not a fixed deadline, so travelling beyond one mean decay length has a nonzero probability.

Interpret the percentage relative to the classical kinetic energy, so that $K_{\mathrm{rel}}=1.02K_{\mathrm{cl}}$. Set $\beta =v/c$ and use the Lorentz factor $\gamma =(1-{\beta }^2{)}^{-1/2}$. The relativistic kinetic energy and classical kinetic energy giveFor the positive nonzero speed, insert ${\beta }^2=1-{\gamma }^{-2}$ and cancel $\gamma -1$:It follows thatHere $m{c}^2=938\mathrm{MeV}$ is the proton's rest energy; the resulting relativistic kinetic energy is $12.479\mathrm{MeV}$. The zero-speed equality before cancellation has no meaningful percentage excess because both kinetic energies then vanish.

The special relativity expression for momentum is $p=\gamma mv$, with Lorentz factor $\gamma =(1-v^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$. Equal speeds imply equal Lorentz factors, so the pion and proton momenta are in the ratio of their rest masses:The common dimensionless product is $\gamma v/c=p_p/(m_{p}c)=400/0.94\simeq 425.53$, giving $\gamma \simeq 425.53$ and $v/c\simeq 0.99999724$.

Let the object be at rest in $S^{\prime }$, with proper length $L_0=x_2^{\prime }-x_1^{\prime }$. Measuring its length in $S$ requires two endpoint events simultaneous in $S$, so $\Delta t=0$. The Lorentz transformation then givesThis is length contraction. The simultaneous endpoint events in $S$ are not simultaneous in $S^{\prime }$; that relativity of simultaneity is essential to the measurement.

For the two rockets, take the first rocket's Earth-frame velocity as $+c/2$ and the second's as $-c/2$. The velocity-addition formula gives the second rocket's velocity in the first rocket's rest frame:Its Lorentz factor is ${\gamma }_{\mathrm{rel}}=5/3$, and therefore its measured length isHere “appear” is interpreted as a length measured using simultaneous endpoint positions in the observer's inertial frame. A photograph, involving unequal light travel times, is a different measurement.

For collinear inelastic capture followed by two photons, each particle has $\mathbf{p}=\gamma m\mathbf{u}$ and $E=\gamma m{c}^2$, with $\gamma =(1-u^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$. An isolated collision conserves the vector sum of momentum and total energy, including rest energy, internal excitation and radiation. It need not conserve the sum of individual rest masses. At low speed,recovering the classical kinetic energy after subtracting $m{c}^2$.

Here the incoming Lorentz factors are $5/3$ and $5/4$, soThe composite therefore hasIts rest mass exceeds $7m$ because relative kinetic energy has become internal rest energy.

For the subsequent collinear photon pair, $E_{+}+E_{-}=10m{c}^2$ and $(E_{+}-E_{-})/c=mc$. Thus $E_{+}=11m{c}^2/2$, $E_{-}=9m{c}^2/2$, andThe positive-$x$ photon is the higher-frequency one.

Take inertial axes parallel, with frame $S^{\prime }$ moving at $+v\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ relative to $S$ and origins coincident at zero time. The Lorentz factor is ${\gamma }_v=(1-v^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$; $\Delta x,\Delta y,\Delta t$ are separations of the same pair of events in $S$, and primed quantities are their separations in $S^{\prime }$. The transverse coordinates are unchanged. For two events on an inertial clock's worldline,The proper time $\Delta \tau$ is that clock's elapsed time; uniform speed $w$ gives $\Delta t={\gamma }_w\Delta \tau$. Coordinate intervals between spatially separated events must instead be Lorentz-transformed with their spatial separation included.

For the round trip in the station frame, the rendezvous distance is $u{t}_{\mathrm{out}}$, and the return has the same speed and distance. Thus $t_{\mathrm{round}}=2t_{\mathrm{out}}=10a/(\sqrt{7}c)$. Its departure and arrival both occur at the station, so $\Delta x=0$ for these endpoints:This uses the return speed as measured by the station. The elapsed time aboard A, apart from an ideal instantaneous turn, would be $\Delta t_{S,\mathrm{round}}/{\gamma }_u$.

For the crash, A's station-frame velocity components are $(3c/5,\sqrt{7}c/5)$, while B's are $(3c/5,0)$. Here ${\gamma }_u=5/3$ and ${\gamma }_v=5/4$. Four-momentum conservation, with no separately escaping radiation, gives the wreckage totals in the station frame:In B's original inertial frame the same totals areThe invariant wreckage mass is $m\sqrt{14/3}$, exceeding $2m$ because internal energy remains in the wreckage. Its momentum cannot be specified without naming a frame; both natural frames have been given.

For a particle of rest mass $m_r$, $E=\gamma m_r{c}^2$ and $p=\gamma m_{r}v$, with $\gamma =(1-v^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$. The low-speed expansion is $E=m_r{c}^2+\frac{1}{2}{m}_r{v}^2+O(m_r{v}^4/c^2)$, separating invariant rest energy from the nonrelativistic kinetic energy term.

Conserve the total laboratory energy and momentum at coalescence: $E_{\mathrm{tot}}=4m{c}^2$ and $p_{\mathrm{tot}}=2.4mc$. Since $V=c^2{p}_{\mathrm{tot}}/E_{\mathrm{tot}}$, the combined particle moves at $0.6c$. Its rest mass is $M=\sqrt{4^2-2.4^2}m=3.2m$. The incident particle is not of mass $m$: its stated energy and momentum imply $m_{\mathrm{incident}}=\sqrt{3^2-2.4^2}m=1.8m$. ThusThe extra $0.4m{c}^2$ is internal rest energy retained by the composite after a perfectly inelastic collision; total energy and four-momentum are conserved, while the sum of individual rest masses need not be.

The composite's Lorentz factor is $1.25$. For a rest-frame lifetime $\tau$, the corresponding laboratory time is $1.25\tau$ and its travel distance isIf $\tau$ denotes a mean radioactive lifetime, this is the mean flight distance, not a fixed distance for every decay. The separate frame diagrams below use the common positive collision axis.

The spacecraft clock measures proper time $\tau$, while a clock at rest with Earth measures the launch-to-emission interval $t$. Neglect Earth's subsequent motion and gravity, as in the intended special relativity model. The Lorentz factor and time dilation giveIn Earth's inertial frame, the spacecraft's displacement at emission is $d=vt$. ThereforeHere $\tau =43200\mathrm{s}$ and the speed of light is $c=2.99792458\times 10^8\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. The distance is evaluated at the emission event, using simultaneous Earth-frame endpoints, as required by relativity of simultaneity; the return signal has not yet reached Earth. A distance assigned on the spacecraft's simultaneous time slice is different: Earth has moved away at $c/3$ for $12\mathrm{h}$ in that frame, giving $c\tau /3=4$ light-hours. Specifying the reference frame is essential to the numerical answer.

Momentum identity. From the Lorentz factor, $v^2/c^2=1-{\gamma }^{-2}$. The relativistic three-momentum therefore satisfiesTogether with relativistic energy $E=\gamma m{c}^2$, this gives the energy–momentum relation $E^2-p^2{c}^2=m^2{c}^4$.

Parent in the laboratory. The rest energy is $m_0{c}^2=1\mathrm{GeV}$, while the total relativistic energy is $3\mathrm{GeV}$. ConsequentlyIts momentum magnitude is $p_{0}c=\sqrt{3^2-1^2}\mathrm{GeV}=\sqrt{8}\mathrm{GeV}$.

Daughters in the zero-momentum frame. The centre-of-momentum frame is initially the parent's rest frame. Conservation of momentum gives ${\mathbf{p}}_1^{\ast }=-{\mathbf{p}}_2^{\ast }$. Equal daughter rest masses then imply equal relativistic energies. Conservation of relativistic energy givesTheir speeds are thereforeThe two velocities are opposite, and $p_X^{\ast }c=\sqrt{(1/2{)}^2-(1/3{)}^2}\mathrm{GeV}=\sqrt{5}\mathrm{GeV}/6$. Their total kinetic energy is $m_0{c}^2-2m_X{c}^2=m_0{c}^2/3$.

Invariant of the complete system. Before the decay, in the centre-of-momentum frame,After the relativistic two-body decay,In the laboratory, four-momentum conservation fixes the summed daughter energy to $3\mathrm{GeV}$ and their summed momentum to the parent's ${\mathbf{p}}_0$. Thus the same calculation isThe invariant is formed after summing the daughter four-momenta; adding their separate squared rest energies would omit the relative-motion contribution to the invariant mass of the pair.

Experimental evidence. Tests of special relativity check linked predictions about light propagation, clocks and four-momentum. Several independent kinds of experiment support those predictions.

The observed partial-drag coefficient agrees with this first-order prediction rather than simple Galilean addition of $u$. It tests a different consequence of the Lorentz transformation from a particle-lifetime measurement.^[ref]

Atmospheric muons and the two frame descriptions. Atmospheric cosmic rays create unstable particles whose decay chains produce muons. A stopped-muon experiment measures the time between a stopping signal and the subsequent decay electron, obtaining the proper mean lifetime ${\tau }_0\simeq 2.2\mu \mathrm{s}$. The associated light-travel distance is only $c{\tau }_0\simeq 660\mathrm{m}$, yet substantial numbers of energetic atmospheric muons reach detectors after travelling several kilometres.

For an ideal selected cohort produced height $h$ above a detector and moving downward at constant speed $v$, the flight time in the terrestrial frame is $h/v$. Time dilation predicts a laboratory mean lifetime $\gamma {\tau }_0$, hence survival fractionWithout time dilation, the predicted exponent would be $-h/(v{\tau }_0)$ and the surviving population much smaller. Altitude comparisons constitute a cosmic-ray muon time-dilation experiment: select comparable momenta or energies and account for detector acceptance, atmospheric energy loss and backgrounds before interpreting the count ratio.

For illustration, not as a claimed measurement, take $h=10\mathrm{km}$ and $v=0.998c$. Then $\gamma =15.82$, the laboratory flight time is $33.4\mu \mathrm{s}$, and the predicted surviving fraction is about $0.38$. Omitting time dilation would give only about $2.5\times 10^{-7}$ on the same idealized constant-speed model.

In the muon rest frame, its decay still follows $e^{-\Delta \tau /{\tau }_0}$. The atmosphere and ground move upward. Their separation, measured simultaneously in that frame, is shortened by length contraction:The same survival fraction follows. The terrestrial description uses a longer-lived moving particle; the muon-frame description uses a shorter atmospheric flight path. They describe the same production and detection events. This consistency illustrates both time dilation and length contraction, while the survival measurement is not two independent experimental tests merely because it can be described in two frames.

Energy-momentum invariant. For a particle with rest mass $m$,Since $E=m{c}^2+K$, substitution and cancellation of $m^2{c}^4$ giveThis relativistic energy-momentum relation reduces to $K\simeq p^2/(2m)$ when $K\ll m{c}^2$.

Laboratory beam energies. If both final muons are at rest in the laboratory, their total momentum is zero and their total energy is $2m_{\mu }{c}^2$. Four-momentum conservation therefore requires equal and opposite incoming momenta. Because the electron and Positron have equal rest masses, they then have equal total energies:Subtract each particle's own rest energy:Using the usual handbook rest energies gives approximately $105.1\mathrm{MeV}$ for each beam. These are the ideal kinematic threshold values. Just above threshold, the pair has small, equal and opposite momenta in this laboratory frame.

Positron momentum. Apply the relativistic energy-momentum relation to $E_{+}=m_{\mu }{c}^2$ and use its stipulated negative-$x$ direction:The electron has the opposite momentum, $p_{e,x}=+p_0$ with $p_0=c\sqrt{m_{\mu }^2-m_e^2}$.

Boost to the electron rest frame. The electron's velocity is $v=p_{e,x}{c}^2/E_{-}=p_0/m_{\mu }>0$. Thus $S^{\prime }$ moves in the positive-$x$ direction, and its Lorentz factor satisfiesThe positron has the same laboratory total energy as the electron, so $v{E}_{+}/c^2=v{m}_{\mu }=p_0$. The supplied Lorentz transformation then givesAs a sign check, the same boost gives $p_{e,x}^{\prime }=\gamma (p_0-v{E}_{-}/c^2)=0$, as required for the electron rest frame.

The relativistic kinetic energy is the total energy minus the rest energy:Here $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor and $c$ the speed of light. The binomial series, with $b=v/c$, givesFor $v\ll c$, the leading term is the classical kinetic energy $M{v}^2/2$. The ratio of the fourth-order term to that leading term is $3v^2/(4c^2)$. ConsequentlyThe condition concerns one term of the binomial series; it is not the condition that the entire relativistic correction be exactly $1\%$.

Use energy units $m=m_p{c}^2$, $M=m_A{c}^2$, $e=E_{\gamma }$ and $P=pc=\sqrt{E^2-m^2}$. The soft-photon resonant capture threshold follows from four-momentum conservation:For fixed proton energy the left side is largest at head-on incidence. Its threshold is $E+P=2E_0$. Combining that with $(E-P)(E+P)=m^2$ givesEquality is allowed for a head-on photon. Here $e=k_{B}T=2.3482\times 10^{-4}\mathrm{eV}$, soA very soft photon needs an enormous proton Lorentz factor to reach the specified invariant mass. A true thermal photon distribution and a finite-width resonance would smear this monoenergetic threshold.

For $\theta =0$, $E-P=m^2/(E+P)\le m$, whereas $2E_0\gg m$, so production is impossible. For each nonzero angle, sufficiently large energy is possible, and $P\simeq E$ givesTo find the maximum deflection in soft-photon capture, note that the final particle's transverse momentum comes entirely from the photon:Writing $x=\cos \theta$, maximization gives $(1-x)(2x+1)=0$ and the interior maximum $x=-1/2$. Therefore, to the same extraordinarily accurate ultrarelativistic order,The neglected relative corrections are of order $m^2/E_0^2$ and $e/E_0$, both around $10^{-24}$. The final particle is effectively collinear with the proton despite a large photon incidence angle.

For total relativistic energy $E=\gamma m{c}^2$, the speed is $v=c\sqrt{1-(m{c}^2/E{)}^2}$. Both beam energies are enormously greater than the rest energy, so expanding the square root avoids obscuring the small difference:With all energies in GeV, $m{c}^2=0.9383$, $E_1=4000$ and $E_2=6500$, givingThe deficits below the speed of light are about $8.25\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $3.12\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. The large energy increase therefore produces only a small speed increase; the energy mainly changes the Lorentz factor. These numbers use the quoted beam energies as total energies. Interpreting them as kinetic energies requires adding the rest energy, with only a tiny correction at these scales.

Three experimental tests probe different consequences of special relativity. The Michelson-Morley experiment compares light round trips along perpendicular interferometer arms while changing the apparatus orientation. Its small observed orientation-dependent fringe shift contradicts the simple stationary-aether prediction and supports orientation-independent round-trip light speed. It does not, alone, exclude every alternative theory.^[ref]

In the muon storage-ring time-dilation experiment, fast circulating muons live longer in laboratory time than muons at rest. Measuring decay counts versus elapsed laboratory time and independently determining the beam Lorentz factor tests ${\tau }_{\mathrm{lab}}=\gamma {\tau }_0$. Circular motion includes acceleration, so this also tests the applicability of accumulated proper time along the stored trajectory.^[ref]

Bertozzi's electron speed-energy experiment measures electron time of flight and deposited kinetic energy independently. An electrostatic accelerator and a linear accelerator increase the energy while the measured speed approaches the light-speed limit. Calorimetry checks that the additional beam energy is real, rather than inferring it only from an assumed voltage-to-speed relation. The result supports relativistic $K=(\gamma -1)m{c}^2$ rather than extending $K=m{v}^2/2$ to arbitrarily large speeds.^[ref]

For the two ships, set launch time to zero and measure Earth time in years. Their Lorentz factors are ${\gamma }_A=5/4$ and ${\gamma }_B=5/3$. Bob's thirtieth birthday occurs after one year of his proper time, so its Earth coordinates areIf Alice sends at Earth time $t_A$, her position is $x_A=3c{t}_A/5$. The left-going light signal obeys $x=x_A-c(t-t_A)$. Intersection with Bob givesAlice's elapsed proper time is thereforeShe sends two months after her twenty-ninth birthday. This compares the emission and reception events; the captains' clocks need only be synchronized at launch, not kept numerically synchronized afterward.

The relative recession speed isThe longitudinal relativistic Doppler effect then givesEquivalently, the left-going photon has Earth frequency $f_0/[{\gamma }_A(1+3/5)]=f_0/2$, and Bob's frame supplies another factor ${\gamma }_B(1-4/5)=1/3$. Both methods give the same redshift.

Take overdots in this question to mean differentiation with respect to the orbiting particle's proper time $\tau$. Write $\mu =GM/c^2$, $x=r/\mu$ and $\ell =hc/(GM)$, with $h$ the specific angular momentum. Then the dimensionless timelike effective potential isThe last term is the relativistic correction to the Newtonian centrifugal-plus-gravitational potential. At large $r$ the two agree. Newtonian angular momentum gives an infinite inner centrifugal barrier for nonzero $h$; the relativistic correction lowers that barrier and permits plunge. The exterior problem starts at $r=2\mu$, where $U=-c^2/2$; extrapolating the potential towards $r=0$ is not a static exterior description.

Circular orbits obeyThere are two extrema when $h^2>12(GM/c{)}^2$: an inner maximum representing an unstable circular orbit and an outer minimum representing a stable one. At equality they merge at $r=6\mu$; below it neither exists. More explicitly, evaluate the curvature at a circular orbit:Timelike circular orbits require $r>3\mu$. They are radially stable for $r>6\mu$, so the marginally stable inner limit is $r_{\mathrm{ISCO}}=6GM/c^2$. The Newtonian potential instead has one stable minimum at $r=h^2/(GM)$, without an innermost stable circular orbit.

For the Schwarzschild circular-orbit local speed in the question, $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor relative to a local Schwarzschild static observer, not $dt/d\tau$. That observer's clock obeys $dT=\sqrt{1-2\mu /r}dt$. Since the particle passes with local speed $v$, $rd\varphi /d\tau =\gamma v$. Circular normalization givesThus $v=c/2$ at the innermost stable circular orbit. Using Schwarzschild time in place of the local clock would give a different speed.

For the conserved particle energy measured at infinity, substitute $h^2$ in the circular energy equation. Setting $y=\mu /r$ givesTake the positive root for a future-directed exterior orbit. It approaches $m{c}^2-GMm/(2r)$ at large radius. The marginally bound circular Schwarzschild orbit solves $k=1$, giving $y(4y-1)=0$ and hence $r_{\mathrm{mb}}=4GM/c^2$ at finite radius. It is unstable; strictly bound circular orbits have $r>4\mu$, with $E<m{c}^2$. The phrase smallest bound orbit here denotes this marginal circular limit, not a prohibition on a bound-energy trajectory plunging below it.

At the innermost stable circular orbit,A radiatively efficient thin disc with a zero-torque inner boundary condition can therefore release about 5.7% of the accreted rest energy before the plunge. energy advection, stress at the inner edge and photon capture can alter the escaping luminosity, so this is a model efficiency rather than a universal emitted fraction.

For the Kerr ISCO spin limits of an equatorial prograde disc around a rapidly rotating Kerr black hole, the innermost stable circular orbit moves inward and its specific energy decreases. In the ideal extremal limit its Boyer-Lindquist radius tends to $\mu$, $E/(m{c}^2)\to 1/\sqrt{3}$, and the corresponding binding-energy efficiency tends to 42.3%. Retrograde rotation has the opposite trend: the extremal limit is $r_{\mathrm{ISCO}}=9\mu$, $E/(m{c}^2)=5/(3\sqrt{3})$, giving about 3.8%. The prograde limiting coordinate radius does not identify a massive orbit with the null horizon generator.^[ref]

Finally $\dot{t}=k/(1-2\mu /r)=1/\sqrt{1-3\mu /r}$. Dividing $\dot{\varphi }=h/r^2$ by this givesIts algebraic form is exactly Newtonian, but $r$ is the Schwarzschild spacetime areal radius and $t$ Schwarzschild time, normalized at infinity. Local clock rates, orbit stability and binding energy remain relativistic. With $G{M}_{\odot }\simeq 1.3271\times 10^{20}{\mathrm{m}}^3{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$,The marginally bound circular-orbit frequency is about $0.404\mathrm{kHz}$. These Schwarzschild ISCO orbital frequencies and marginally bound frequencies are rotation frequencies per distant stationary observer's time, as intended by using $d\varphi /dt$. A static observer at finite radius $r_o$ instead divides both frequencies by $\sqrt{1-2\mu /r_o}$, leaving their ratio unchanged. Identifying an observed quasi-periodic oscillation with the innermost stable circular orbit orbital frequency is an additional astrophysical assumption.

For a blob in a relativistic jet, take two emission events separated by time $\Delta t_e$ in the galaxy frame. The blob moves transversely by $u\Delta t_e\sin \theta$, while its second photon has $u\Delta t_e\cos \theta$ less distance to travel to the distant observer. Therefore the arrival interval is $\Delta t_{\mathrm{obs}}=\Delta t_e(1-\beta \cos \theta )$ andDifferentiating with respect to viewing angle gives $d{\beta }_{\mathrm{app}}/d\theta =\beta (\cos \theta -\beta )/(1-\beta \cos \theta {)}^2$. The maximum occurs at $\cos \theta =\beta$ and equals $\beta \gamma$. Hence apparent superluminal motion is possible precisely when $\beta \gamma >1$, or $\beta >1/\sqrt{2}$. This is an arrival-time effect; the material and every local signal still travel slower than light.

For $\gamma \gg 1$, $1-\beta \simeq 1/(2{\gamma }^2)$ and $1-\beta \cos \theta \simeq ({\gamma }^{-2}+{\theta }^2)/2$. Thus the Doppler factor isThe Lorentz-invariant specific intensity gives $I_{\nu }/{\nu }^3=I_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }/{\nu }^{\prime 3}$. Since $\nu =D{\nu }^{\prime }$, a power-law spectrum with $I_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }\propto {\nu }^{\prime -\alpha }$ gives $I_{\nu }(\nu )=D^3{I}_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }(\nu /D)\propto D^{3+\alpha }$. This is Doppler boosting of a moving blob: the spectral flux density of an unresolved, intrinsically isotropic blob has the same boost. Comparing identical approaching and receding blobs, with no differential absorption,A spatially steady continuous jet can have a different boost exponent because the emitting material contributing at one arrival time differs; it must not silently replace the specified blob model.

Using the stipulated peak of the photon-photon pair production cross section, not the exact head-on threshold, givesThe relevant photons are near infrared. Interpret the quoted $F_2$ as target-band energy flux, or energy flux per logarithmic frequency interval, consistent with its units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$; it is not a spectral flux density per hertz. For isotropic emission $L_2=4\pi d^2{F}_2$. In a stationary source of radius $R$, the order-of-magnitude photon energy density is $L_2/(4\pi R^{2}c)$, soThe luminosity variability size bound gives $R\lesssim c\Delta t$. Taking the largest allowed radius gives the smallest stationary-source optical depth in this estimate:This assumes the gamma rays and target photons occupy the same region, with an approximately isotropic target field and an order-unity geometric escape factor. A smaller region makes the gamma-ray compactness problem worse.