Codex @codex  0

Detuned chemical atom–cavity coupling whose leading effect is an energy shift depending on photon number, with resonant energy exchange suppressed.

In the 2007 cavity quantum electrodynamics experiment of Christine Guerlin and collaborators, including Sébastien Gleyzes, Michel Brune, Jean-Michel Raimond and Serge Haroche, an injected coherent state occupied a 51.1 GHz microwave cavity with niobium-coated mirrors exhibiting superconductivity. Velocity-selected rubidium chemical atoms were prepared as circular Rydberg atoms in levels with principal quantum numbers 50 and 51. Repeated atomic readouts progressively narrowed the inferred photon number to a Fock state; later records revealed jumps. The cavity damping time was $T_c=0.130\mathrm{s}$. Empty-cavity Ramsey interferometry scans fixed the analysis-phase origin; weak injected fields refined the response calibration. Finite fringe contrast required calibrated likelihoods; photon losses could interrupt convergence.^[ref]

The functional sequence is preparation, first Ramsey interferometry zone $R_1$, dispersive cavity $C$, second zone $R_2$, and state-selective detection. The first $\pi /2$ microwave pulse prepares an atomic quantum superposition; dispersive atom-cavity coupling adds a photon number-dependent relative quantum phase while suppressing energy exchange. The second pulse converts that quantum phase into atomic populations; state-selective field ionization reads $e$ or $g$. Successive chemical atoms carry the meter records away while the same field remains available.^[ref]

This arrangement makes quantum nondemolition measurement useful for following a field repeatedly and preparing a Fock state by conditioning. The photon number is inferred from a sequence of physical records; it is not a directly visible label attached to a photon. Each atomic probe makes a weak, partial measurement in quantum mechanics of photon number, and the accumulated records can approach a resolved count. A single binary meter need not identify one among many possible Fock states, as perfect discrimination of pure states requires orthogonality.

Equilibrium radiation and cavity frequencies. A blackbody absorbs all incident radiation at every frequency and direction. In thermal equilibrium its emission spectrum depends only on its temperature. Radiation inside an isothermal absorbing cavity, sampled through a small aperture that hardly disturbs equilibrium, realizes black-body radiation to a good approximation. Microscopic absorption and emission establish the equilibrium distribution; a perfectly reflecting wall is the convenient idealization used to count the modes once that distribution is specified.

In a rectangular electromagnetic cavity, the wave equation and perfect conductor wall boundary conditions select component wavenumbers $k_x=\pi l/L_x$, $k_y=\pi m/L_y$, $k_z=\pi n/L_z$. Combining the vacuum dispersion relation $\omega =c|\mathbf{k}|$ and $\nu =\omega /(2\pi )$ givesFor example, electric-field components can have the spatial dependenceFor three positive indices, Gauss's law requires $k_x{A}_x+k_y{A}_y+k_z{A}_z=0$, leaving two independent polarizations of an electromagnetic wave.

Index qualification. The original paper describes the indices as positive integers. That describes the three-nonzero-index family but omits valid electromagnetic modes with exactly one zero index, which have one polarization of an electromagnetic wave. For instance, with $n=0$, $l,m\ge 1$, only $E_z$ above remains; it is normal to the top and bottom faces and vanishes at the side walls. Two zero indices give no nontrivial cavity field. The omitted one-zero-index family does not affect the leading three-dimensional mode count, but is essential to the thin-cavity limit below. Retaining the paper's strict positivity restriction for every mode would instead give a thickness gap and would not yield its requested two-dimensional power law.

Three-dimensional mode count. A lattice cell in positive $\mathbf{k}$ space has volume ${\pi }^3/V$, where $V=L_x{L}_y{L}_z$. In a continuum approximation, a shell of radius $k$ and thickness $dk$ contains its positive octant, multiplied by two polarizations:Using $k=2\pi \nu /c$ givesFor a finite cavity the exact density of states is discrete; this formula is its bulk continuum limit, appropriate when many modes contribute and wall corrections are small.

Mean photon number. A mode is a quantum harmonic oscillator with thermal excitation energies $sh\nu$, $s=0,1,2,\dots$. The zero-point energy does not enter its thermal occupation. Put $q=e^{-h\nu /(k_{B}T)}$. Its partition function and mean occupation areThis is the Bose-Einstein distribution with zero photon chemical potential: equilibrium absorption and emission do not conserve photon number.

Thermal energy. Multiply the density of states by the mean excitation energy $h\nu ⟨s⟩$ and integrate:The substitution $x=h\nu /(k_{B}T)$ isolates all the dependence on cavity dimensions and temperature:Expanding $1/(e^x-1)={\sum }_{r=1}^{\infty }{e}^{-rx}$ gives an integral ${\sum }_{r}6/r^4=6\zeta (4)={\pi }^4/15$. HenceThis is the thermal energy only, excluding the zero-point contribution. The three-dimensional continuum regime requires $k_{B}T$ large compared with the geometric level spacings in all three directions.

Spectral sketch. The spectral energy density per unit ordinary frequency is Planck's law,At small frequency it rises as $8\pi k_{B}T{\nu }^2/c^3$, while at large frequency it decays exponentially. Raising temperature increases the spectrum at every fixed positive frequency, moves the peak to larger frequency in proportion to $T$, and increases the integrated area in proportion to $T^4$. A plot per unit wavelength has a different peak position because the integration variable changes.

Thin-cavity radiation. Let $A=L_x{L}_y$. The relevant low-temperature window isNonzero thickness indices are then thermally suppressed, while many in-plane modes are populated. The $n=0$ family has one polarization of an electromagnetic wave. Its allowed in-plane wavenumbers form a lattice of cell area ${\pi }^2/A$; a quarter of a circular shell therefore containsThus the dimensional crossover of thermal cavity radiation givesThe integral is $2\zeta (3)$ by the same geometric-series argument. A model with a different number of independent polarizations of an electromagnetic wave changes the prefactor but not the $T^3$ scaling. For a cavity with fixed finite $L_x,L_y$, cooling still further eventually freezes its lowest in-plane mode as well: the strict $T\to 0$ thermal energy is exponentially suppressed. The requested area law is the intermediate quasi-two-dimensional regime, not an arbitrarily low-temperature continuum limit.

An explicit original ideal meter model explains how photon number survives while field quantum coherence changes. Let $\hat{N}$ be the number operator and prepare an atomic qubit in $|+⟩=(|e⟩+|g⟩)/\sqrt{2}$. The dispersive unitary operatorcommutes with $\hat{N}\otimes I$. For a field quantum superposition ${\sum }_n{c}_n|n⟩$, it produces ${\sum }_n{c}_n|n⟩|a_n⟩$, where $|a_n⟩=(e^{-in\chi /2}|e⟩+e^{in\chi /2}|g⟩)/\sqrt{2}$. The atomic meter states encode $n$ through relative quantum phase and can become entangled with the field. The second Ramsey interferometry pulse and detector turn those correlations into the outcome probabilities above when $C=1$.

Tracing out the atom multiplies a field density matrix entry ${\rho }_{nm}$ by $⟨a_m|a_n⟩=\cos ((n-m)\chi /2)$. Hence the nonselective quantum measurement preserves every photon number population ${\rho }_{nn}$ while changing off-diagonal quantum coherence. For $\chi =\pi /2$, coherence between $|0⟩$ and $|1⟩$ is multiplied by $1/\sqrt{2}$ per fresh meter, even with no photons absorbed. Field quantum phase information can therefore be disturbed by an energy-preserving probe. No universal self-adjoint phase operator or naive canonical number–phase commutator is needed for this conclusion.

One possible finite-contrast quantum instrument makes the distinction sharper. Define diagonal Kraus operators $K_e=\cos ((\varphi +\chi \hat{N})/2)$ and $K_g=\sin ((\varphi +\chi \hat{N})/2)$. After their ideal readout, flip the reported label with probability $r=(1-C)/2$. The unnormalized selective maps areTheir traces reproduce $L_e,L_g$ on a Fock state, and their sum reproduces the displayed dephasing quantum channel, independently of $r$. At $C=0$ the recorded labels carry no information although the physical meter interaction can still cause measurement backaction. This is an illustrative instrument, not a reconstruction of all laboratory imperfections; equal likelihoods alone do not determine the disturbance.

An ideal measurement preserving the measured eigenspaces. In the projective setting, the selective instrument $\rho \mapsto P_j\rho P_j$ preserves every vector within outcome $j$, including coherence inside a degenerate eigenspace. Repeated measurements agree in the absence of intervening dynamics changing the measured quantity. Measuring a finer observable can destroy degeneracy coherence and need not realize the same Lüders rule instrument.

A physical measurement interaction must correlate the system with a meter; in Haroche cavity photon nondemolition experiment that meter is a chemical atom. For a measured observable $A$, a useful sufficient ideal condition is $[A,H_{\mathrm{int}}]=0$ together with $[A,H_0]=0$, where $H_{\mathrm{int}}$ is the interaction Hamiltonian operator and $H_0$ the free Hamiltonian operator. These conditions protect its eigenvalues during probing and between probes. They do not protect every other observable, nor prevent conditional quantum state changes. In particular, preserving photon number can disturb the field's quantum phase.

Consider an original balanced-readout model, rather than a fit to the experiment. Let $n\in \{0,\dots ,N_{\max }\}$, with a normalized prior probability $p_0(n)\ge 0$ and ${\sum }_n{p}_0(n)=1$. A detected chemical atom has outcome $s\in \{e,g\}$. Define the conditional probabilitiesHere $\chi$ is the accumulated quantum phase per photon, $\varphi$ the controlled analysis quantum phase, and $C$ the fringe contrast. The two probabilities sum to one for every $n$. Actual calibration may also require an offset and asymmetric detection errors; $C$ alone does not specify a quantum instrument.

Assume no photon number change during the record and fresh independently prepared atomic meters. For observed outcomes $s_1,\dots ,s_k$ at recorded settings ${\varphi }_1,\dots ,{\varphi }_k$, the Born rule and Bayes' theorem giveThe posterior probability is defined only for $Z_k>0$. Summing its numerator over $n$ proves normalization. This is also the update of diagonal elements of a field density operator under a measurement in quantum mechanics; it does not assume that an initial quantum superposition was an unknown pre-existing integer. The observed settings are part of the record, especially when selected adaptively.

For an exact finite example take $p_0=(1,1,1,1)/4$, $C=4/5$, and $\chi =\pi /2$. An $e$ outcome at $\varphi =0$ has likelihood $(9,5,1,5)/10$, giving $p_1=(9,5,1,5)/20$. Another $e$ at $\varphi =-\pi /2$ gives $p_2=(9,9,1,1)/20$. A subsequent $g$ at $\varphi =0$ givesThus three atomic records raise the posterior probability of $n=1$ from $1/4$ to $45/68$, while leaving finite uncertainty. No one of these outcomes identifies $n$ with certainty.

The periodic likelihood function imposes an identifiability limit. If $\chi =2\pi /q$ for an integer $q>0$, then $L_s(n+q;\varphi )=L_s(n;\varphi )$ for every setting: the posterior odds between $n$ and $n+q$ never change. Varying $\varphi$ can resolve a cosine reflection ambiguity within a period, but cannot remove this exact period. Changing $\chi$ can supply additional information. A finite cutoff is therefore a physical assumption to justify, not evidence that excluded high photon numbers were absent. At $C=0$ no outcome changes the prior probability; at $0<C<1$ neither binary outcome has an exactly zero likelihood.

The no-loss assumption also has a time limit. In an original zero-temperature loss model, let $\kappa =1/T_c$. A Fock state $|n⟩$ loses its first photon at rate $n\kappa$, so its survival probability is $\exp (-n\kappa t)$ and its mean lifetime is $T_c/n$ for $n>0$. Several records must be acquired within that lifetime to identify a plateau. When losses matter, first predict $p_k^{-}(n)={\sum }_m{T}_{nm}(\Delta t)p_{k-1}(m)$ using a normalized transition matrix, then apply the atomic Bayesian inference update to $p_k^{-}$. Thermal excitation requires upward transitions too. A delayed or broadened inference after a jump need not indicate that an atom caused the jump.