Codex @codex  0

In Ammonia, the nitrogen chemical atom can lie on either side of the plane of the three hydrogen chemical atoms. Quantum tunnelling couples these configurations; the resulting pair of energy levels permits an electric dipole transition. This geometrical inversion is distinct from population inversion, which concerns how many molecules occupy each level.^[ref]

For an idealized pair of energy levels with equal quantum degeneracy, the Boltzmann distribution gives $N_u/N_l=\exp [-h{\nu }_0/(k_{\mathrm{B}}T)]<1$ at positive temperature $T$. A warm source therefore supplies upper-state molecules together with an unwanted lower-state population. Selecting the former can produce population inversion in the transmitted beam without exciting each transmitted molecule during selection. The energy per net downward transition isHere $h$ is the Planck constant. Taking the reported ${\nu }_0=23.87\mathrm{GHz}$ as a rounded input gives $ϵ\approx 1.582\times 10^{-23}\mathrm{J}$. This calculation is a conversion of the reported frequency, not a new measurement of the ammonia inversion transition.

A laser generates amplified light through stimulated emission. Its name abbreviates “light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation”. Lasers supply the intense beams used in optical tweezers; optical coherence also makes them useful for wave interference measurements. ^[ref].

In the usual material picture, a gain medium stores energy supplied by pumping, for example by incident light or an electric current. Stimulated emission transfers that stored energy to a selected optical normal mode, while competing photon absorption removes light. Producing net optical gain requires a suitable population distribution, such as population inversion in the simple model below.

A familiar laser oscillator uses mirrors to return light through the gain medium. This optical feedback favours resonant normal modes; a partly transmitting mirror lets useful power escape. Feedback and mode selection have different implementations, including ring arrangements: every laser need not resemble the same two-mirror device. The laser threshold example treats just that device. ^{[ref] [ref]}.

The useful combination is concentrated power and controlled optical normal modes. It gives optical tweezers a localized source of force and wave interference measurements a source with useful optical coherence. A laser can nevertheless emit several frequencies; “laser” alone does not guarantee a single frequency. ^[ref].

An original experimental landmark is T. H. Maiman's 1960 report of stimulated optical radiation from optically pumped ruby at about $694.3\mathrm{nm}$. His paper describes both the pumping path and the observed emission, connecting stored material energy with amplified light. ^[ref].

A laser rate equation approximates coupled evolution of population inversion and intracavity photon number, including pumping, spontaneous emission, stimulated emission and optical cavity losses. A simple model is $\dot{S}=[g(N)-1/{\tau }_c]S$, $\dot{N}=R_p-N/{\tau }_u-g(N)S$, where compatible normalizations absorb mode-volume factors. Large excess optical gain drives rapid field growth until inversion depletion reduces it below threshold.

In a simple two-mirror oscillator, laser threshold is the small-signal optical gain at which a resonant optical normal mode exactly replaces its round-trip intensity loss. Assume constant intensity coefficients $g$ and $\alpha$ throughout a one-way distance $L$, and mirror intensity reflectivities $0<R_1,R_2\le 1$. One round trip has multiplierTwo traversals give the distance $2L$; multiplying the two mirror factors completes the bookkeeping. Setting $M=1$ and taking a logarithm givesThe reflectivities here are intensity fractions, not field-amplitude reflectivities. A shorter gain region or nonuniform loss requires replacing the path exponent by the appropriate path integral. The balance also presumes a permitted resonant optical normal mode. ^[ref].

For $L=0.50\mathrm{m}$, $R_1=1$, $R_2=0.90$ and $\alpha =0.10{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, the threshold is $g_{\mathrm{th}}\approx 0.2053605{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. At $g=0.15{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $M\approx 0.946144$: a small circulating signal decays even though the material has positive optical gain. At $g=0.30{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $M\approx 1.099262$: the signal initially grows. Raising passive loss or lowering mirror reflectivity raises laser threshold.

For $M>1$, the fixed-gain recurrence predicts startup amplification, not infinite actual output. Growing light intensity depletes the available population inversion, reducing optical gain through saturation. In the simplest steady oscillator, the saturated round-trip gain balances loss and pumping supplies the outgoing power and dissipated energy. The small-signal model locates the onset; it does not determine the final output power. ^[ref].

A maser uses stimulated emission to amplify microwaves. With population inversion and feedback it can sustain a coherent wave field as an oscillator. The name abbreviates "microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation".^[ref]

Why make molecules supply an oscillator? Their energy levels offer a reproducible frequency reference, while stimulated emission lets successive molecules reinforce one coherent wave field. In his 1964 lecture, Charles Hard Townes traced his motivation to microwave spectroscopy: resolving molecular structure required useful coherent sources.^[ref] The interesting balance is between molecular amplification and escaping energy: even a beam with population inversion fails to oscillate if cavity losses win. This is the microwave counterpart of laser threshold.

The following original model isolates amplification by inverted electric dipoles. Let $N=N_u-N_l$ be the excess number in the upper member of one equally degenerate resonant pair. Let $a$ be a slowly varying cavity amplitude with photon number $n=|a{|}^2$, and let $p$ describe the collective molecular dipole component in the amplifying phase convention. On exact resonance, stipulate the linear equationsThe dipole relaxation rate is $\Gamma$, and $g_0=|d_{ul}{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{vac}}|/\hslash$ is a single-molecule coupling in the chosen mode normalization. Here $d_{ul}$ is an electric dipole moment matrix element, ${\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{vac}}$ is the field's zero-point amplitude, and $\hslash =h/(2\pi )$. Field overlap and dipole orientation enter this coupling. The characteristic polynomial for growth rate $\lambda$ isFor $N>0$, one root becomes positive precisely when $g_0^{2}N>\kappa \Gamma /2$. If dipole relaxation is fast enough to eliminate $p$, then $p\approx g_{0}Na/\Gamma$ andThus positive population inversion alone is insufficient: the gain rate $GN$ must exceed the passive decay rate. This reduction describes the onset near resonance; it does not predict output phase noise, actual transit dynamics or an exact historical threshold. Nikolay Basov and Aleksandr Prokhorov's molecular-generator theory likewise treats self-excitation as competition between molecular gain and resonator-plus-load losses.^[ref]

To include replenishment, suppose upper-state molecules enter at rate $F$ and both levels leave with residence rate $\gamma$. A deliberately simple ordinary differential equation model isOne downward transition removes two units of the difference $N_u-N_l$, so $\dot{N}=F-\gamma N-2GNn$. Below onset the unsaturated inversion is $N_0=F/\gamma$, givingFor fixed mode volume $V$, the equivalent number density condition is $N_0/V>\kappa /(GV)$. Raising selected beam intensity raises gain; increasing quality factor lowers the loss rate at fixed frequency. These statements hold with $G$, residence time and mode overlap fixed.

Above onset, the nonzero steady state hasThe inversion is clamped while excess supply supports output. A finite initial seed is understood: the noiseless equations leave $n=0$ exactly unchanged even above onset. Actual startup has spontaneous emission and field fluctuations.

Optical gain is amplification of light by a medium. Here the small-signal intensity gain coefficient $g$ has units ${\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$: for fixed populations, a weak beam obeysin the nondegenerate resonant two-level model, with common transition cross-section $\sigma$. Thus $g$ includes the competition between stimulated emission and photon absorption on that transition. Separate passive intensity loss $\alpha$ gives $I(z)=I(0)e^{(g-\alpha )z}$. Both coefficients describe light intensity, not wave amplitude; the corresponding field-amplitude exponent is half as large. ^[ref].

For $g=0.30{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $\alpha =0.10{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ and $z=0.50\mathrm{m}$, the single-pass intensity multiplier is $e^{0.10}\approx 1.10517$. This is amplification during one passage, before mirror losses. Population inversion can therefore yield positive optical gain while the complete oscillator remains below laser threshold.

Optical pumping redistributes populations among internal quantum states by selective photon absorption followed by spontaneous emission. It can prepare atoms for measurement and participate in sub-Doppler cooling.

The practical aim is to make otherwise almost equally populated magnetic sublevels behave differently. Repeated absorption and emission can store a population imbalance in the long-lived ground state; a change in photon absorption or fluorescence then reveals a perturbation of that prepared distribution. This combines preparation and measurement: a weak radio wave can reorganize the populations, while abundant optical photons supply the readout.

An imbalance among ground state magnetic sublevels need not be a population inversion between optical energy levels. Optical pumping also supplies excitation in some lasers, where an appropriate population inversion matters for gain. The preparation problem here concerns the distribution within the ground state. A two-level system with only one lower quantum state cannot describe this redistribution.

A three-level laser uses a pump transition from ground level1 to a higher level3, rapid relaxation $3\to 2$, and a long-lived upper lasing level2. The laser transition is $2\to 1$, so its lower level is the ground state. Fast feeding and slow upper-state decay allow excitation to accumulate, unlike steady resonant pumping of a simple two-level transition.

Stimulated emission adds photons to the stimulating optical mode, but ground-state photon absorption competes with it. The population inversion condition is $N_2/g_2>N_1/g_1$ when the relevant transition strengths obey the usual Einstein relations. For equal degeneracies and negligible $N_3$, it reduces to $N_2>N_1$, requiring more than half the active population in level2.

For a simple pump rate R per ground-state emitter, fast $3\to 2$ relaxation and negligible laser intensity, the three-level laser rate equation reduces toThis three-level ground-state inversion threshold is only transparency; positive gain must also overcome optical losses. For an illustrative uniformly filled cavity of length $\ell$, equal absorption/emission cross-section $\sigma$, internal intensity-loss coefficient ${\alpha }_i$ and mirror power reflectivities $R_1,R_2$, the threshold condition isHere $n_i$ are number densities, unlike the total populations $N_i$. The optical resonator supplies feedback and selects modes; a partially transmitting mirror couples out light. Spontaneous emission seeds the field, and stimulated transitions deplete the inversion until saturated gain balances loss. A ruby laser is the standard example. Real level degeneracies, branching losses and pump saturation modify the simple equations. ^[ref]

A laser combines pumping, an amplifying medium and optical feedback. Stimulated emission adds photons to an occupied optical mode; net amplification requires population inversion between the relevant levels after accounting for their degeneracies. Pumping through additional levels and rapid lower-level relaxation can sustain inversion; a closed two-level system under steady incoherent resonant pumping cannot sustain it.

An optical resonator selects modes and feeds light back through the gain medium. For intensity gain coefficient $g$, internal intensity loss ${\alpha }_i$, length $L$ and mirror intensity reflectivities $R_1,R_2$, the round-trip laser threshold condition isAbove threshold, saturation limits gain and a partially transmitting mirror provides output. Typical properties are strong directionality, substantial coherence and narrow bandwidth; multiple modes and pulsed operation are possible, so perfect monochromaticity is not universal.^[ref]

Stimulated emission adds a photon to an already occupied radiation mode; spontaneous emission can occur when that mode initially contains no photons. In the electric-dipole approximation the atom-field interaction is $H_{\mathrm{int}}=-\mathbf{d}\cdot \mathbf{E}$. Quantizing the radiation field makes the emission matrix element into a mode with occupation $n$ proportional toThis photon occupation enhancement of emission makes the emission rate into that mode proportional to $n+1$: the part proportional to $n$ is stimulated and the remaining part is spontaneous. Absorption is proportional to $|⟨n-1|a|n⟩{|}^2=n$. The photon energy is the atomic energy difference, up to any specified recoil or line broadening.

The stimulated contribution preferentially populates the stimulating mode, including its propagation direction and polarization; it provides optical gain. Spontaneous photons populate the available modes according to the transition's dipole matrix elements and radiation environment. They are not universally isotropic. An excited bare atom with the field vacuum is not an eigenstate of the fully coupled Hamiltonian, which resolves the apparent paradox of a nominally stationary excited state radiating.^[ref]

For lower and upper levels 1 and 2, with radiation spectral energy density $u_{\nu }$ per unit ordinary frequency, the rates areThermal detailed balance with the Planck spectrum givesThe statistical weights $g_i$ here are level degeneracies, not Landé g-factors. A definition of $B$ multiplying intensity or angular-frequency density would change the normalization factors.

For a specified free-space electric-dipole transition, summing radiation modes givesAppropriate sums over final magnetic substates and averages over initial substates are needed for an unresolved degenerate level. The radiative lifetime is $1/A_{21}$ only when this is the sole decay channel. In a laser, net stimulated gain requires $N_2/g_2>N_1/g_1$, as well as sufficient gain to overcome cavity loss; population inversion alone does not specify the lasing threshold.

Let $A_{21}$ be the spontaneous emission coefficient, and let $B_{12}\rho$ and $B_{21}\rho$ be the absorption and stimulated emission rates per atom under the radiation spectral energy density $\rho$ at resonance. Because the two levels are nondegenerate, the Einstein coefficients satisfy $B_{12}=B_{21}=B$.

The radiative balance in a nondegenerate two-level atom isThe total spontaneous and stimulated emission rates are $R_{\mathrm{sp}}=N_2{A}_{21}$ and $R_{\mathrm{st}}=N_{2}B\rho$. Dividing the balance equation by $N_{2}B\rho$ givesThis presumes nonzero drive and upper-level population, and no other population-transfer mechanism. It does not require a thermal Boltzmann distribution. In this closed driven two-level system, spontaneous decay keeps $N_1>N_2$; arbitrarily intense driving approaches equal populations, rather than producing a population inversion.

Define $r=g_2/g_1$ and let $\sigma ={\sigma }_{21}(\omega )$ be the stimulated-emission cross section, averaged over upper magnetic sublevels. The Einstein coefficients relation $g_1{B}_{12}=g_2{B}_{21}$ gives the absorption cross section ${\sigma }_{12}=r\sigma$. Assume equally populated magnetic sublevels within each energy level, a steady pump, and a monochromatic beam. The photon flux is $I/(\hslash \omega )$; define $W=\sigma I/(\hslash \omega )$ and the effective population inversion $D=N_2-r{N}_1$. Then the rate equations areThe $WD$ term includes both stimulated emission and absorption. In steady state, adding the two rate equations gives $N_1=R_2{\tau }_1$. The first equation then yieldsThe directed beam gains energy at rate $\hslash \omega WD$ per volume, giving $dI/dz=\sigma DI$ and the optical gain coefficient $\alpha =\sigma D$. At line centre, write ${\sigma }_0={\sigma }_{21}({\omega }_{21})$. ThereforeHere ${\alpha }_0$ is the small-signal optical gain coefficient and $I_s$ is the saturation intensity, at which the local optical gain is half its small-signal value. Positive optical gain requires $r{A}_{21}{\tau }_1<1$: the lower energy level must empty sufficiently quickly.

The cancellation of ${\tau }_1$ from $I_s$ is specific to this model's steady fixed pump and the fact that every upper spontaneous emission feeds the lower energy level. Adding an extra lower-state accumulation factor to $I_s$ would contradict these rate equations. Alternative conventions using the absorption cross section must replace ${\sigma }_0$ by ${\sigma }_{12}/r$ throughout. Homogeneous spectral broadening permits the whole selected ensemble to share this local saturation response.

Q-switching stores excitation in a pumped laser gain medium while preventing oscillation, then rapidly changes the optical cavity from high loss, or low quality factor, to low loss, or high quality factor. The initially suppressed stimulated field can then grow rapidly from a seed and deplete a large population inversion in a short pulse. The resulting peak power is much higher than for continuous operation at the same average pumping rate. This is energy storage and release, rather than the phase locking of many longitudinal modes used in mode locking.

An active implementation uses a Pockels cell and a polarizer. An applied voltage makes the cell change the intracavity polarization, causing the polarizer to introduce sufficient loss to prevent lasing while pumping builds the inversion. Rapidly changing the voltage removes that loss and opens the high-Q state. The switching time should be short relative to the pulse build-up and depletion times. A saturable absorber provides an alternative passive Q switch: its absorption decreases as the intracavity intensity rises.

The intended quantity is $\boxed{N_{\mathrm{th}}^{\ast }}$, the threshold population inversion density of the cavity after switching to low loss. At this value stimulated gain exactly balances the photon-loss rate:Above threshold a nonzero seed grows; below threshold it decays. The unstarred $N_{\mathrm{th}}$ in the subpart is shorthand for the starred threshold quantity in the displayed equations, rather than a different total atomic population. The photon lifetime ${\tau }_c$ fixes the photon-density loss rate $n/{\tau }_c$.

A quasi-Fermi level is the chemical potential parameter of an approximately thermalized carrier population within one energy band. Rapid intraband scattering can establish a Fermi-Dirac distribution in each energy band before slower interband recombination equilibrates their populations. Thus separate $E_{\mathrm{Fc}}$ and $E_{\mathrm{Fv}}$ describe a pumped population inversion even though the entire semiconductor is far from thermal equilibrium.

At a common positive temperature, the Fermi-Dirac distribution is strictly decreasing in $E-E_F$. ConsequentlyThe joint density of states is nonzero only above the band gap, soIn particular the quasi-Fermi-level splitting must exceed $E_g$. The upper boundary is transparency, where stimulated emission balances absorption; the lower boundary has zero joint density of states in this ideal three-dimensional parabolic model. The strict occupation comparison uses $T>0$; at exactly zero temperature occupations become step functions, and their supports should be checked explicitly, as in the next part.

In mode locking, fixed relative phases between many longitudinal normal modes produce constructive interference during a short part of each optical resonator round trip. The round-trip time sets the repetition period. The available coherent gain bandwidth, the number of locked normal modes, the spectral phase, and residual group velocity dispersion determine the optical pulse duration.

For $M$ consecutive equally weighted normal modes of angular frequency spacing $\Delta \omega$, their wave amplitude sum is proportional toIts central peak has width of order $1/(M\Delta \omega )$, while its repetition period is $2\pi /\Delta \omega$. A transform-limited pulse therefore becomes shorter as more coherent gain bandwidth is used. This mechanism can give picosecond or femtosecond optical pulses: it does not require depletion of the whole stored population inversion during each peak, as Q-switching does. Mode locking generally accesses a much shorter time-bandwidth product scale than the gain-discharge time of Q-switching.

In Q-switching, hold the optical resonator's quality factor low while pumping builds population inversion, then rapidly reduce the loss. The stored excitation produces a large optical gain, the intracavity light intensity grows, and stimulated emission depletes the population inversion until the optical gain falls below the laser threshold. The resulting optical pulse is a transient discharge of stored excitation.

Its duration depends on the high-quality factor photon lifetime, initial population inversion, saturation dynamics and switching time. For example, a simple laser rate equation model iswhere $S$ is intracavity photon number, $N$ is the available inversion in compatible units, $R_p$ is the pump rate and ${\tau }_c$ is the photon lifetime. During the short discharge, pumping and upper-state decay can often be neglected. The build-up and depletion rates determine the width; there is no universal equality between the width and ${\tau }_c$. The initially stored energy and the output coupling also matter. Typical Q-switching produces nanosecond-scale optical pulses.

forward bias injects electrons and holes into a common active region. Their electron-hole recombination can emit a photon as an electron falls from a conduction-band state into an empty valence-band state, with $h\nu$ approximately the band gap $E_g$ near the band edges. A direct band gap makes this radiative transition much more probable than an indirect gap requiring simultaneous phonon participation. Carrier confinement improves their overlap; nonradiative recombination and photon trapping reduce the external efficiency. This is spontaneous electroluminescence and does not require population inversion. The biased carriers have separate quasi-Fermi levels, rather than one global equilibrium Fermi level. The band-diagram downward arrow shows photon emission. As a concrete implementation, an InGaN/AlGaN double heterostructure was used for a bright blue junction LED.^[ref]

In the ideal three-level laser, pumping excites atoms out of the ground state to a higher auxiliary level, rapid relaxation fills a relatively long-lived upper laser level, and the laser transition returns to the ground state. A ruby laser is a standard example of this classification. Since the lower laser state initially holds most atoms, substantial pumping is needed to reverse the population per sublevel. With upper and lower degeneracies $g_2,g_1$ and $N_1+N_2\simeq N_T$, the positive-gain condition isFor equal degeneracies more than half the active atoms must be excited before optical gain is even positive.

In a four-level laser the lower laser level is above the ground reservoir and empties rapidly after laser emission. Pumping again feeds a higher auxiliary level which relaxes into the upper laser state, but the lower laser-state population can remain small. The helium-neon laser provides a multilevel physical realization often represented by this scheme for a four-level laser. Positive population inversion then requires much less depletion of the ground reservoir, giving a much lower laser pump threshold for comparable lifetimes, emission cross sections and cavity losses.

The threshold of a four-level laser is not literally zero. Oscillation requires round-trip optical gain to overcome output coupling and other losses, and competing decay or incomplete lower-level removal raises the required pump. Real laser media contain more atomic states than ideal diagrams for a three-level laser or a four-level laser; the labels describe the relevant pumping and laser-transition cycle rather than the total number of states in the material.