Codex @codex  0

For two identical fermions of mass $m$ in the same one-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator, use center of mass $X=(x_1+x_2)/2$ and separation $r=x_1-x_2$. The corresponding oscillator masses are $2m$ and reduced mass $m/2$, with the same frequency $\omega$. If $N,n$ are their occupation numbers, the unperturbed energy is $\hslash \omega (N+n+1)$. The fermionic exchange symmetry requires even $n$ with a spin-one-half singlet state and odd $n$ with a spin-one-half triplet state.

For a delta potential $\lambda \delta (r)$ the first-order shift is $\lambda |{\phi }_n^{\mathrm{rel}}(0){|}^2$. Every odd relative wavefunction vanishes at contact, so these states remain exact unaffected eigenstates of the spatial problem. For the even relative ground state, the oscillator length is $\sqrt{2}\ell$, where $\ell =\sqrt{\hslash /(m\omega )}$, and the shift is $\lambda /(\sqrt{2\pi }\ell )$, independent of $N$. This separates interaction-sensitive singlets from contact-insensitive triplets.

Let $a,b$ be distinct orthonormal spatial orbitals occupied by two identical spin one-half particles, with a weak repulsive Coulomb interaction. The symmetric and antisymmetric spatial combinations have first-order energy shifts $J+K$ and $J-K$, where $J$ is the direct Coulomb integral andThe Coulomb kernel has positive Fourier transform $4\pi /|\mathbf{k}{|}^2$, so $K\ge 0$. Fermionic exchange symmetry pairs the symmetric spatial function with the spin-one-half singlet state and the antisymmetric one with the spin-one-half triplet state. For these fixed orbitals the triplet lies lower by $2K$ when $K>0$. This does not compare arbitrary singlets and triplets with different orbital occupations; for negligible orbital overlap the splitting can vanish.

For two identical spin-one-half fermions with no additional antisymmetric internal factor, the antisymmetric spin-one-half singlet state combines with an even-$\ell$ symmetric orbital state, while the symmetric spin-one-half triplet state combines with an odd-$\ell$ antisymmetric orbital state.

Consider an original noninteracting model with three orthonormal spatial orbitals $A,B,C$ at energies $0,\Delta ,3\Delta$, where $\Delta >0$. Both spin projections are available at each energy, so there are six spin orbitals. The Quantum Hamiltonian is $H=h\otimes I+I\otimes h$, with no interaction between particles and no dependence on spin. Comparing its allowed ground states isolates the effect of fermionic exchange symmetry.

For two distinguishable spin-one-half particles, the spatial ground state is $A\otimes A$ and any of four independent two-spin states is possible: $E_0=0$ and ground-state degeneracy four. For two identical electrons, both can still occupy $A$, using $A\uparrow$ and $A\downarrow$, but there is just one allowed ground state: the symmetric spatial factor times the spin-one-half singlet state,Exclusion has reduced the ground-state degeneracy without raising the ground state energy.

Now restrict both particles to the same spin projection $\uparrow$. Distinguishable particles can still both occupy $A\uparrow$, so $E_0=0$. Identical electrons must occupy different spatial orbitals; the lowest choice is $A,B$, withThe spin factor is a spin-one-half triplet state, and the spatial factor is antisymmetric. These are ground states within the restricted parallel-spin sector, not the unrestricted two-electron ground state. Both restricted models have ground-state degeneracy one.

The first excited two-electron energy in the unrestricted model is $\Delta$, with four independent quantum states: one occupant in $A$, one in $B$, and two spin choices for each. A basis adapted to particle exchange operators separates these into one spin-one-half singlet state with symmetric spatial factor and three spin-one-half triplet states with antisymmetric spatial factor. All four have equal energy in this model. Singlet versus triplet does not by itself determine an energy gap; an interaction or a spin-dependent term is needed to split them.

As a further count, the full two-electron space has dimension $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{6}{2}\right)=15$. Its energies in units of $\Delta$ and corresponding multiplicities are $(0,1,2,3,4,6)$ and $(1,4,1,4,4,1)$. For distinguishable spin-one-half particles the ordered tensor product instead has dimension $6^2=36$, with multiplicities $(4,8,4,8,8,4)$ at those same energies. These are exact model counts, not atomic measurements. The higher restricted ground state energy follows from removing forbidden quantum states; the Quantum Hamiltonian contains no additional “exclusion force”.

Exclusion constrains complete one-particle states, not a collection of little spatial boxes. In particular, two opposite-spin electrons in the same spatial orbital haveThe spatial factor is symmetric; the spin-one-half singlet state supplies the required antisymmetry. At ${\mathbf{r}}_1={\mathbf{r}}_2$, this wavefunction need not vanish for opposite spin labels. For equal spin labels it does vanish. In a continuous position description, an exact coincident point has zero measure anyway; the useful comparison concerns joint probability densities or detection in finite regions. Equal positions do not imply equal complete quantum states.

The fermionic occupation numbers $n_{\alpha }=0,1$ refer to a chosen orthonormal basis of one-particle states. A quantum superposition need not have definite occupation numbers in that basis, and an expectation value $⟨n_{\alpha }⟩$ can be fractional. For example, one electron in $(u+v)/\sqrt{2}$ has mean occupation number $1/2$ in each of two orthogonal spin orbitals, without splitting into two particles. The canonical anticommutation relations give $(a_{\alpha }^{†}{)}^2=0$ and make $a_{\alpha }^{†}{a}_{\alpha }$ a projector, so its expectation value stays between zero and one in every normalized quantum state.

Parahydrogen uses the antisymmetric spin-one-half singlet state,Here $I_{\mathrm{n}}$ labels total nuclear spin; it is not the moment of inertia $I$ in the linear rigid rotor formula. There is one nuclear-spin state for every rotational quantum state. The lowest allowed rotational level is $J=0$, and the next is $J=2$. The description “opposite spins” alone is insufficient: the relative minus sign distinguishes this singlet state from the zero-projection member of the triplet state.

For identical particles, the particle exchange operator exchanges both spatial and spin labels. The symmetrization postulate requires a symmetric full state for bosons and an antisymmetric full state for fermions. A product $\Psi =\varphi \chi$ must therefore have spatial and spin exchange eigenvalues whose product is $+1$ or $-1$, respectively; a general state may be a sum of such products.

For orthonormal spatial orbitals $u,v$, the combinations ${\varphi }_{\pm }=[u(1)v(2)\pm v(1)u(2)]/\sqrt{2}$ have opposite exchange parities. Two spin-one-half fermions combine ${\varphi }_{+}$ with the antisymmetric spin-one-half singlet state $(|\uparrow \downarrow ⟩-|\downarrow \uparrow ⟩)/\sqrt{2}$, or ${\varphi }_{-}$ with one of the three symmetric spin-one-half triplet states. Two particles in the same spatial orbital must be a spin singlet. This is the Pauli exclusion principle applied to complete spin orbitals, not a ban on sharing a spatial orbital with opposite spins.

A Slater determinant enforces fermionic antisymmetry for many occupied spin orbitals. Bosonic symmetrization instead uses a permanent; repeated orbital occupations are allowed. These exchange requirements apply even when particles do not interact.

At zero field, the spin-one-half triplet state has energy $\Delta /4$ and degeneracy three; the spin-one-half singlet state has energy $-3\Delta /4$ and degeneracy one:For $\Delta >0$ the singlet is lower; for $\Delta <0$ the triplet is lower. If $\Delta =0$, all four states coincide.

Inside the infinite square well, the orbital and spin operators act on different factors of the tensor product. Write $\mathbf{S}={\mathbf{S}}_1+{\mathbf{S}}_2$. The identityshows that the exchange interaction commutes with $S^2$ and $S_z$. The sum of the one-particle kinetic energies also commutes with them and with particle exchange. Thus one may use orbital quantum numbers together with the total-spin sector $S=0,1$ and projection $M=-S,\dots ,S$, with physical $S_z=\hslash M$.

For identical spin one-half particles the Pauli exclusion principle further restricts the states. The spin-one-half singlet state is antisymmetric in spin and must multiply a symmetric spatial wavefunction; a spin-one-half triplet state must multiply an antisymmetric spatial wavefunction. Thus $n_1,n_2$ label unordered orbital occupations in symmetry-adapted states, not arbitrary ordered product states. This gives the labels $|n_1,n_2,S,M⟩$, with the paper's last label expressed in units of $\hslash$.

Write the trap angular frequency as $\omega$ and the single-particle oscillator length as $\ell =\sqrt{\hslash /(m\omega )}$. The center of mass coordinate $X=(x_1+x_2)/2$ and relative coordinate $r=x_1-x_2$ give independent quantum harmonic oscillators, both of frequency $\omega$, with masses $2m$ and reduced mass $m/2$. Label their excitation numbers by $N$ and $n$. The unperturbed energy eigenvalue is $\hslash \omega (N+n+1)$.

Particle exchange leaves $X$ unchanged and sends $r$ to $-r$. The exchange symmetry of two identical spin-one-half fermions therefore requires even $n$ to accompany the spin-one-half singlet state, and odd $n$ to accompany a spin-one-half triplet state. For the contact shifts of two spin-one-half fermions in a harmonic trap, the delta potential depends only on $r$. For odd $n$, the relative wavefunction vanishes at $r=0$, so its contact shift is zero. Within the first-excited manifold, both perturbations are diagonal in the labels $(N,n,S,M)$: this is a perturbation diagonal within a degenerate eigenspace. For $n=0$, the relative oscillator length is $\sqrt{2}\ell$, giving the first-order nondegenerate perturbation theory shiftThe Zeeman splitting is $2{\mu }_B{B}_{z}M$ for total spin projection $\hslash M$. Thus the five lowest states, counted with multiplicity, haveunder the assumed conditions $|U|,2{\mu }_B|B_z|\ll \hslash \omega$. The three triplet states have slopes $-2{\mu }_B,0,2{\mu }_B$, while both singlet states are field independent at this order. The three triplet state branches coincide at zero magnetic field. Their crossing with the excited singlet state is allowed because the total-spin sectors do not mix. The odd relative wavefunctions are in fact unaffected by this delta potential at any coupling; the displayed singlet state shifts retain only first order.

Write $|\uparrow ⟩,|\downarrow ⟩$ for the two $S_3$ eigenstates, of eigenvalues $\pm \hslash /2$. The spin-spin interaction can be evaluated usingFor $|\beta |\gg |\alpha |$, take $H_0=\beta (S_3^{(1)}-S_3^{(2)})/\hslash$ and $V=\alpha {\mathbf{S}}^{(1)}\cdot {\mathbf{S}}^{(2)}/{\hslash }^2$. The unperturbed energy eigenvalues are $\beta ,-\beta ,0,0$ on $|\uparrow \downarrow ⟩,|\downarrow \uparrow ⟩,|\uparrow \uparrow ⟩,|\downarrow \downarrow ⟩$, respectively. For an isolated normalized energy eigenstate $|n⟩$, first-order nondegenerate perturbation theory gives $\Delta E_n^{(1)}=⟨n|V|n⟩$. The two antiparallel spins have expectation $-\alpha /4$, soFor the zero-energy degenerate eigenspace, degenerate perturbation theory requires diagonalizing the restriction of $V$. On the ordered basis $(|\uparrow \uparrow ⟩,|\downarrow \downarrow ⟩)$ it is $(\alpha /4)I$: the ladder operators cannot take one parallel state to the other. Indeed neither parallel state couples to anything else under $H$, so the remaining two levels are exactly $\alpha /4$, retaining their twofold quantum degeneracy.

For $|\alpha |\gg |\beta |$, take $H_0=\alpha {\mathbf{S}}^{(1)}\cdot {\mathbf{S}}^{(2)}/{\hslash }^2$ and $V=\beta D$, where $D=(S_3^{(1)}-S_3^{(2)})/\hslash$. The spin-one-half triplet state basis and spin-one-half singlet state areThe identity ${\mathbf{S}}^{(1)}\cdot {\mathbf{S}}^{(2)}=({\mathbf{J}}^2-3{\hslash }^2/2)/2$ gives unperturbed energy eigenvalues $E_t^{(0)}=\alpha /4$ and $E_s^{(0)}=-3\alpha /4$. Direct action givesConsequently the restriction of $V$ to the entire triplet degenerate eigenspace is zero, so no first-order splitting is missed. The singlet expectation is also zero. In second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory, $\Delta E_n^{(2)}={\sum }_{r\ne n}|⟨r|V|n⟩{|}^2/(E_n^{(0)}-E_r^{(0)})$. Within the triplet, the corresponding second-order effective matrix is ${\beta }^2|t_0⟩⟨t_0|/\alpha$, already diagonal in this basis. Thus, through second order,The last two expressions have higher corrections beginning at $O({\beta }^4/|\alpha {|}^3)$, as the exact calculation in part (d) also verifies. For positive $\alpha$, coupling to the lower singlet raises the triplet's $M=0$ level and lowers the singlet; the signs are precisely the energy denominators above.

For spin $1/2$, $\mathbf{S}=\hslash \mathbf{\sigma }/2$. The Pauli matrices satisfy ${\sigma }_i{\sigma }_j={\delta }_{ij}I+i{ϵ}_{ijk}{\sigma }_k$. The antisymmetric term vanishes on contraction with $n_i{n}_j$, and $|\mathbf{n}|=1$, so $(\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }{)}^2=I$. Separating the even and odd terms of the exponential series givesFor the single-particle Hamiltonian, unitary time evolution consequently acts asFor two spins the joint eigenstates of total angular momentum are the spin-one-half triplet statewith $J^2=2{\hslash }^2$ and $J_3=m\hslash$, and the spin-one-half singlet stateThese follow by adding the two spin-$1/2$ angular momenta, or by direct action of the Pauli matrices.

The two terms of the specified Hamiltonian commute, so its evolution factorizes into rotations with opposite angles on the two tensor factors. The unique initial $J_3=\hslash$ state is $|\uparrow \uparrow ⟩$. With $c=\cos (\lambda t/2)$, $s=\sin (\lambda t/2)$, its evolved state isThe singlet amplitude is $i\sqrt{2}cs$, giving the requested probability

The intrinsic parity $\eta$ of a particle is the parity eigenvalue of its one-particle state at rest:For the particles in this question, $\eta =\pm 1$. A two-particle state has multiparticle parity ${\eta }_1{\eta }_2(-1{)}^{\ell }$, where $\ell$ is its relative orbital angular momentum.

The pionic-deuterium ground state has atomic $\ell =0$. Since the pion has spin zero, its total angular momentum is therefore the deuteron spin, $J=1$, and its parity is ${\eta }_d{\eta }_{\pi }={\eta }_{\pi }$. The two neutrons are identical fermions. Their antisymmetric spin-one-half singlet state would require even orbital $\ell$, but $S=0$ and $J=1$ would instead require $\ell =1$. Hence they must occupy the symmetric spin-one-half triplet state, so the orbital state is antisymmetric and $\ell$ is odd. The addition of angular momentum with $S=J=1$ permits $\ell =0,1,2$, leaving $\ell =1$. Thus parity conservation givesso the pion has intrinsic parity $\boxed{{\eta }_{\pi }=-1}$.

In ${\Delta }^{-}\to {\pi }^{-}+n$, the final total spin is $S=1/2$. Coupling it to $\ell$ to obtain $J=3/2$ givesso the allowed orbital angular momenta are $\boxed{\ell =1,2}$. The observed angular probability is ${\cos }^2\theta =|P_1(\cos \theta ){|}^2$, where $P_1$ is a Legendre polynomial; it therefore selects the $\ell =1$ partial wave rather than $\ell =2$. The parity selection rule for a two-body decay now givesTherefore the delta particle has intrinsic parity $\boxed{{\eta }_{{\Delta }^{-}}=+1}$.

The spin raising operator and spin lowering operator areThe angular momentum commutation relations implyso $S_{\pm }|s,\sigma ⟩$ is proportional to $|s,\sigma \pm 1⟩$. Sinceits squared norm isChoosing the conventional positive phase gives

Using the spin ladder operators,and thereforeIn the ordered product basis of the tensor product of quantum systemsthe matrix representation isThe two parallel-spin states are already eigenvectors. Diagonalizing the central block gives the four energy eigenvaluesThis is the spectrum of the Two-spin Heisenberg Hamiltonian in an opposing longitudinal field.

The asserted ground-state ordering requires the antiferromagnetic case $\alpha >0$. As $B\to 0$,The corresponding state at $E_{-}$ is the unique spin-one-half singlet statewhereas the three states at the first excited energy form the spin-one-half triplet state.

Indeed, for the total angular momentum operatorone has at $B=0$The Hamiltonian then has rotational symmetry, so energy depends only on the total-spin sector. The singlet has total spin $s=0$ and multiplicity one; the triplet has $s=1$ and multiplicity $2s+1=3$. This rotational symmetry explains why the triplet energy eigenspace has dimension three.

Write $c=\cos (\theta /2)$ and $s=\sin (\theta /2)$. ThenThus $|\psi ⟩$ is unchanged. It is the spin-one-half singlet state, so joint rotations leave it invariant. Equivalently, direct use of the Pauli matrices showsIt is therefore an eigenstate of every Cartesian component of the combined spin, with eigenvalue zero.

The Affleck--Kennedy--Lieb--Tasaki state places two virtual spin-one-half degrees of freedom at every site, puts neighboring virtual spins into singlets, and projects the two virtual spins at each site onto their symmetric spin-one triplet. Its local tensor is equivalently proportional to ${\sigma }_x,{\sigma }_y,{\sigma }_z$ in the spin-one Cartesian basis, and its Affleck--Kennedy--Lieb--Tasaki parent Hamiltonian is

The one-dimensional cluster state is the simultaneous $+1$ eigenstate of the commuting stabilizersOn a periodic chain it is obtained by applying a controlled-$Z$ gate on every neighboring pair of the product state $|+{⟩}^{\otimes N}$.

After suitable blocking, the two states have the same nontrivial projective virtual symmetry of a matrix product state for the protecting group ${\mathbb{Z}}_2\times {\mathbb{Z}}_2$. The two virtual symmetry generators can be represented by anticommuting Pauli matrices, so they realize the nontrivial projective class in group cohomology. Consequently the AKLT and cluster states can be connected by a symmetry-preserving gapped path, or equivalently by a symmetry-preserving finite-depth local circuit: this is the Symmetry-protected equivalence of the Affleck--Kennedy--Lieb--Tasaki state and cluster state.

Both states therefore exhibit one-dimensional symmetry-protected topological order. On an open chain their nontrivial virtual representation produces protected edge degrees of freedom and a characteristic degeneracy in the entanglement spectrum of a matrix product state. They do not have intrinsic topological order: if the protecting symmetry is discarded, either state can be connected to a product state by a finite-depth local circuit.

Let $|s⟩=|{\psi }^{-}⟩$ be the spin-one-half singlet state, complete it to an orthonormal basis $\{|s⟩,|e_1⟩,|e_2⟩,|e_3⟩\}$, and chooseEach excited population decays into the singlet. On the matrix-unit basis, $|e_j⟩⟨e_k|$ has decay eigenvalue $-\gamma$ after separating off its contribution to the stationary population, while $|s⟩⟨e_j|$ and its adjoint have eigenvalue $-\gamma /2$. The sole zero mode is $|s⟩⟨s|$, so every initial state converges toThe nonzero eigenvalue closest to the origin is therefore

Taking the sum once over each unordered pair, write the All-to-all Heisenberg model asFor even $N$, the minimum total spin is $S=0$, henceFor odd $N$, $S=1/2$ and $E_0=3/2-3N/2$. If the paper's ${\sum }_{ij}$ counts ordered pairs or includes $i=j$, the corresponding harmless factors and additive constant change, but the minimizing total-spin sector is the same.

Now partition an even number of spins into disjoint pairs and put every pair in a spin-one-half singlet state. Each pair has total spin zero, so their tensor product also has $S=0$ and is itself a ground state. Its internal pair contributes $-3$, while correlations between different singlets vanish, giving $-3N/2$ in total. ThereforeThe large degeneracy is special to equal all-to-all coupling: the Hamiltonian sees only total spin and cannot distinguish different singlet coverings.

Distinguishable noninteracting particles. Interpret $V$ as the same external one-particle potential for each particle; the total potential is $V({\mathbf{r}}_1)+V({\mathbf{r}}_2)$. The Time-dependent Schrödinger equation isLet $\hat{h}{\varphi }_a={ϵ}_a{\varphi }_a$ and $\hat{h}{\varphi }_b={ϵ}_b{\varphi }_b$, where $\hat{h}=-{\hslash }^2{\nabla }^2/(2m)+V$. Applying ${\hat{h}}_1+{\hat{h}}_2$ to the product multiplies it by ${ϵ}_a+{ϵ}_b$. The time derivative of $e^{-iEt/\hslash }$ multiplies it by $E$. Thus the proposed stationary product is a solution providedThe tensor product separates the two independent one-particle dynamics.

Identical spin-one-half particles. Identical fermions require antisymmetry under exchange of the complete position-and-spin labels. First take $a,b$ to be distinct orthonormal spatial orbitals, and defineThe symmetric spatial state must multiply the antisymmetric spin-one-half singlet state; the antisymmetric spatial state must multiply one of the three symmetric spin-one-half triplet states. The four normalized possibilities, each with the common time factor $e^{-iEt/\hslash }$, areThese are the required product states under fermionic exchange symmetry. If $a=b$, the antisymmetric spatial combination vanishes. Only the product ${\varphi }_a({\mathbf{r}}_1){\varphi }_a({\mathbf{r}}_2)$ times the singlet remains, as required by the Pauli exclusion principle. A nonorthogonal pair would require different normalization factors; the displayed $1/\sqrt{2}$ assumes an orthonormal stationary-state basis.

Weak repulsive Coulomb interaction. For fixed orbitals $a,b$, first-order perturbation theory gives spatial energy shifts $J\pm K$. Here $J$ is the direct interaction energy, while the exchange integral for repulsion strength $g>0$ isThe positivity follows from the positive Fourier transform of the Coulomb kernel. Consequently Coulomb exchange splitting of two orbitals givesAll three triplet spin components remain degenerate for a spin-independent Coulomb interaction. Their antisymmetric spatial factor vanishes at coincidence and reduces close encounters. The inequality is strict when $K>0$; for negligible orbital overlap, the splitting may vanish. This comparison fixes one particle in each of the specified orbitals and does not rank singlets with a different orbital occupation.

Spin-zero bosons. For one particle in each of the same distinct orthonormal orbitals, the spin factor is symmetric and bosonic exchange symmetry requires ${\Phi }_{+}$. At coincident positions,Thus the bosonic coincidence enhancement in two orthogonal orbitals isThese are joint probability densities, or small-detector-volume limits; an exactly specified point has zero probability in a continuous distribution. If both particles occupy the same orbital, the properly normalized product is already symmetric and the corresponding enhancement relative to distinguishable particles in that same orbital is one. The paper's usual factor-two answer presumes distinct orthogonal input orbitals.

Identical spin one-half particles are fermions. By fermionic exchange symmetry, the complete spatial-and-spin wavefunction must change sign when the two particle labels are exchanged. Define the normalized antisymmetric spin-one-half singlet stateand the three symmetric spin-one-half triplet statesThe Hamiltonian is independent of spin, so these spin functions carry no additional energy.

Both particles can occupy $u_0$ if their spin factor is antisymmetric. The unique ground state wavefunction isTwo equal-spin particles could not share this orbital, by the Pauli exclusion principle.

At the first excited energy, $E=ϵ={\hslash }^2/(2m{R}^2)$, one orbital is $u_0$ and the other is $u_s$ with $s=+1$ or $-1$. Define symmetric and antisymmetric normalized spatial functionsFor each $s$, all allowed wavefunctions are spanned byThere are $2(1+3)$ orthonormal states, hence first-excited-state degeneracy $g=8$. In each product, exactly one factor is antisymmetric, ensuring the required total fermionic exchange symmetry.