Circumstellar orbit 2026-10-06
An orbit about a star. Dust on such an orbit can experience radiation pressure and Poynting–Robertson drag, in addition to gravitational perturbations.
Collisionless stellar system 2026-10-06
A collisionless stellar system is one for which discrete gravitational encounters change its distribution negligibly over the time under study, usually . Stars can orbit and respond collectively to a varying smooth gravitational potential even in this regime; collisionless does not mean force-free or stable against collective gravitational instabilities. Its smooth distribution follows the Collisionless Boltzmann equation.
Exoplanet transit 2026-10-06
An exoplanet passes in front of its host star as seen by an observer and blocks part of the stellar flux. Exoplanet transit photometry infers geometry and radii from the resulting light curve. A true alignment involves the true anomaly, not generally the mean anomaly.
N-body simulation 2026-10-06
An N-body simulation approximates a dynamical system by evolving interacting particles. In a collisionless galaxy calculation these particles sample a smooth mass distribution rather than represent individual physical stars. Their larger individual masses enhance artificial two-body relaxation; softening, force accuracy and convergence with particle number must be checked over the intended duration.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 58 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Write for the genuine surface density of a disk, and for its three-dimensional mass density. The delta function in the printed surface density formula belongs to , not to . Introduce a reference length to make logarithms dimensionless. The intended model is the infinite, self-gravitating, scale-free Mestel disk, with no extra source or imposed gravitational field.
The circular speed satisfies . Thus the flat galaxy rotation curve givesA reflection-symmetric harmonic function with this midplane boundary value isVerify this continuation using the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. For , set ; thenHence off the astrophysical disk, and reflection gives the lower-half-space solution. Across the astrophysical disk the derivative jumps by . The distributional Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity therefore givesAt the origin the enclosed disk mass tends to zero linearly with radius, so there is no additional central point mass. This verifies the Mestel disk potential-density pair. The astrophysical disk has infinite total mass and a logarithmic Newtonian gravitational potential, so it is not an isolated finite-mass model with Newtonian gravitational potential zero at infinity. The usual scale-free boundary condition is important: the midplane rotation curve alone would also permit an added term , representing an extra uniform sheet without changing the radial circular force. That contribution is excluded in the intended Mestel disk model.
Use a mass-weighted planar galactic distribution function, so is the stellar mass in a small planar phase space element. A number-weighted function instead needs the stellar mass factor when computing . Assume a steady collisionless stellar system and isotropy in the two in-plane velocity components. Put and write . The stationary Collisionless Boltzmann equation becomesSince this holds in every velocity direction, . In coordinates with , this is exactly . Therefore the planar isotropic distribution is , where is the specific orbital energy. Stationarity is essential; instantaneous isotropy alone would not imply this result.
Integrating over the two-dimensional velocity plane gives the planar isotropic distribution inversion:On the astrophysical disk , so . Differentiate the integral with respect to its lower limit:The boundary value as verifies the integrated equation as well as its derivative. Choosing the implicit length unit recovers the printed normalization. Changing the additive energy zero changes this prefactor accordingly.
At a fixed radius, the normalized velocity density isIt is a product of centered Gaussian distributions. Differentiating the supplied Gaussian integral with respect to its coefficient gives the second moments, and odd moments vanish. Thus the in-plane velocity dispersions areAn exactly planar astrophysical disk has and . The nonzero circular speed is a property of the force field, not a statement that this hot stellar distribution has net rotation.
Reversing every retrograde star folds the azimuthal Gaussian to a half-normal distribution. Equivalently the new steady galactic distribution function is , because and are integrals of the motion. Its density and even velocity moments are unchanged. Its streaming velocity isThis maximally prograde stellar distribution still has radial motion and a spread of azimuthal speeds; it does not place every star on a circular orbit. In particular while . The mean speed is smaller than the root-mean-square speed , which explains why it is not the circular speed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 320 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For one target galaxy, an encounter with relative speed sweeps a cylinder of volume in time . Multiplication by the number density gives the encounter rate . Thus the geometric galaxy-encounter rate givesThis is the expected number of mergers in the geometric model. For independent encounters, the Poisson process probability of at least one is , so the displayed linear probability is valid for rare encounters, . There is no factor of one-half for a single target; that factor would enter a count of distinct pairs across the whole population.
For an illustrative group environment, take , , and a Hubble time of order years, or . The path length is about , using the stated distance conversion. HenceThe estimate scales linearly with environment density and quadratically with the adopted merger radius. It is an order-of-magnitude model estimate, not a universal observed merger fraction; reducing the illustrative density by a factor of one hundred reduces the estimate by the same factor.
For the tidal calculation, use the relative potential convention in which acceleration is . Expand the point-mass potential about the target centre:The constant does not exert a force. The linear term accelerates the target centre and is subtracted in its freely falling frame. The remaining leading quadrupolar point-mass tidal potential isThe condition permits the convergent expansion; using only this term is the leading tidal approximation, accurate when the target radius is small compared with the closest separation.
The given impact and velocity directions imply . This trajectory is in the plane, correcting the incompatible printed plane. In the impulse approximation, hold the stellar position fixed while integrating the tidal tensor:For , the needed integrals arewith the mixed integral zero by oddness. Thus the integrated tidal tensor of a straight-line flyby is andThere is stretching along the impact direction, compression in the other transverse direction and no net kick along the path.
Write for the star's initial velocity, distinguishing it from the perturber speed . Its specific energy change is . The no-correlation assumption removes the first term on averaging; it is not an identity for every individual star. The mean specific heating at a given position is thereforeFor a spherical target, the mass-weighted averages satisfy . The tidal impulse heating of a spherical galaxy is consequentlyHere is assumed finite. Notice the change from specific energy to total energy after multiplying by .
For two equal targets, each gains the same internal energy, so . Their relative-motion reduced mass is . If denotes their relative speed at infinity, their initial orbital energy is . Internal tidal heating comes from this orbital energy. In the tidal capture of galaxies model, capture occurs if , which gives the equal-mass tidal-capture thresholdCapture allows further passages and eventual merger in this simplified picture.
The encounter lasts roughly . The impulse approximation needs , so that a star barely moves during the tide. When , stellar orbits respond during the perturbation and the kicks can cancel. Adiabatic invariance of an orbital action produces adiabatic shielding of tidal encounters, rather than the impulsive heating used above. The capture inequality cannot be extrapolated into that slow-encounter regime.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 320 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A small-angle gravitational encounter between a test star and a field star of mass gives a transverse kick , where is the impact parameter and the relative speed. For number density , encounters in occur at rate . Independent kicks add in mean square, giving the random-walk derivation of stellar relaxationThe Coulomb logarithm in stellar dynamics has of order system size , and of order the strong-deflection scale . For a virialized -star system, , so is of order . The stellar relaxation time is the time for accumulated velocity variance to become comparable with :Using gives . With a diameter-crossing convention , this is , conventionally rounded toThe coefficient is approximate: spatial profile, velocity averages and crossing-time convention change it by factors of order unity. The robust result is crossing times.
For and years, the estimate is about years, enormously longer than a Hubble time. Most galaxies therefore behave as collisionless stellar systems. Dense nuclei and star clusters can relax more rapidly. Negligible stellar encounters do not mean negligible collective gravitational instabilities.
Define the mass-weighted galactic distribution function by , so . Hamiltonian gravitational motion preserves phase space volume by the Liouville theorem in Hamiltonian mechanics. In the collisionless regime no encounter term redistributes stars between neighbouring phase space trajectories, so . With acceleration , the Collisionless Boltzmann equation is
For a steadily rotating galactic bar, write the inertial polar angle as . The inertial radial and angular equations are and . Substitution gives the equations of motion in a rotating frame:Here the velocities are measured in the bar frame. Set , and define the positive-force rotating-frame relative effective potentialThe centrifugal sign is positive in this relative-potential convention. The characteristics areConsequently the rotating-frame collisionless Boltzmann equation isFor these planar equations, integrate over and interpret as the planar or vertically integrated mass density. Define . Boundary terms in velocity vanish for a sufficiently decaying distribution.
Let the velocity accelerations above be . Their velocity divergence is . Thus integration by parts in the zeroth moment contributes , producing the cylindrical continuity equation for a rotating stellar systemThis is conservation of mass: change of density balances flux through the radial and azimuthal sides of a small cylindrical element. The factor is geometric; the physical phase space measure is .
For the radial first moment, multiply the rotating-frame collisionless Boltzmann equation by . Its velocity integrations are and . Hence the radial cylindrical Jeans equations in a rotating frame areFor the azimuthal first moment, the velocity integral vanishes, while . This givesThe Jeans equations are local momentum-balance equations. The second moments include streaming momentum flux and random-velocity stress, while gravity, centrifugal acceleration and Coriolis acceleration supply the frame-dependent forces. They do not by themselves close the full distribution: a stress prescription or a galactic distribution function is also needed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 320 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
False. Stellar evaporation removes stars above the escape energy after two-body relaxation has redistributed their energies. The remaining self-gravitating cluster need not become less dense; losing mass is not the same as holding its radius fixed.
For a slowly evolving isolated cluster, apply the virial theorem at each approximate equilibrium: . Stars evaporating with nearly zero energy at infinity remove little total energy, so the bound cluster has nearly constant negative . With gravitational radius defined by ,For homologous structure, its characteristic mean density therefore scales asIt increases as mass is lost. Escaping stars carrying positive energy make the bound energy more negative and strengthen the contraction tendency. This is virial contraction under stellar evaporation, related to the negative heat capacity of bound gravitational systems. A tidally limited globular cluster has additional radius constraints, so this scaling is not universal, but the claimed inevitable density decrease is false even in the simplest isolated evaporation model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 320 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
False as a claimed change between isolated steady endpoints. Conservation of energy by itself would allow a more negative and a larger , but both endpoints must also obey the virial theorem. For a finite isolated equilibrium with no surface term,If total is conserved between the two equilibria, the fixed-energy virial constraint between steady states givesThis includes both ordered rotation and random stellar motion. A galactic bar or other instability can redistribute angular momentum and concentrate a central component, but compensating expansion or rearrangement elsewhere must preserve the global energy constraint. Central concentration alone does not prove that the whole system has a more negative .
A remnant could have different energies if stars escape, or if an external component exchanges energy with it; then the conserved total energy would include that other component. Those cases do not justify treating the bound disc simultaneously as a closed fixed-energy system and as a new equilibrium with increased .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 316 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the separation vector from the star to the comet, and let . The two-body problem separates into uniform centre of mass motion andTaking a cross product with proves conservation of angular momentum; taking the scalar product with proves conservation of energy. The relative constants areThe total relative angular momentum and energy are and , respectively. The conserved eccentricity vector is . Its scalar product with gives , with the true anomaly. The periapsis and apoapsis distances are therefore and . Their sum is twice the semi-major axis, soAt either apsis ; substituting an apsidal radius gives . Thus the specific orbital energy implies the vis-viva equationThese are exact relative-coordinate formulas for an elliptic orbit, . In the barycentric frame the comet's speed is times the relative speed; the printed identification with the comet's stellar orbital speed uses .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 316 1 vi Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
On the corrected steady phase-mixed orbit, each fragment crosses a fixed orbital longitude once per orbital period. Hence the cross-sectional-area current through that point isFrom the fractional luminosity of a phase-mixed eccentric wire, . Therefore the area rate at the foreground crossing of the line of sight isOnly the foreground segment blocks the star; the far-side intersection does not add another occultation current. The orbital area current is constant because the line density varies as , even though the local orbital speed varies.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 316 2 vi Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Radiative drag is only one of several loss mechanisms. Around a star, radiation-pressure blowout can eject small fragments; its threshold applies specifically to zero-kick release from a circular parent orbit. Stellar-wind drag and gas drag can drive planetary migration, while sublimation destroys grains approaching high-temperature regions. Collisional cascades destroy or fragment grains and can feed the unbound size range. Planetary scattering can cause ejection, collision with a planet, or a stellar impact; resonant trapping of dust can instead delay planetary migration.
For circumplanetary orbits, collisions with the planet or its satellites, disruption in collisions, and escape under stellar tidal forces are additional losses. Orbits near or outside the Hill sphere need not remain planet-bound. Radiation pressure on circumplanetary dust can excite planetocentric orbital eccentricity or unbind very small grains; it need not act only through slow Poynting–Robertson drag. For charged grains, the Lorentz force in stellar or planetary magnetic fields can alter or destabilize an orbit. Shadowing of circumplanetary dust changes the radiation-force average and can reduce the quoted decay rate. Which mechanism dominates depends on grain size and composition, environment, orbit orientation and the available collision or gas density.
