Put , with the absolute constant chosen sufficiently large below, and suppose for a contradiction that no with satisfies .
Let
The set is compact and convex, while is closed and convex, so is closed and convex. We use the following finite-dimensional form of the Hahn-Banach separation theorem: if a point lies outside a nonempty closed convex set, there is a linear functional whose value at the point is strictly greater than its supremum over that set. Identifying linear functionals on through the inner product, there is therefore a function such that
The separating functional cannot have zero dual norm, so rescale it to make . Because is closed, convex, and symmetric, the finite-dimensional Bipolar theorem for a dual pair says that the unit ball of is precisely . Thus and .
The support function of is obtained by choosing where and where . In terms of the positive part of a real-valued function , the separating inequality becomes
Since , pointwise we have , and hence
Apply the supplied polynomial approximation of the positive part to . If , then its uniform approximation error and imply
The constant function and belong to the dual unit ball. By the assumed submultiplicativity, for every . Dual seminorm therefore gives
The stated coefficient bound, with in chosen larger than the absolute constant in that bound, makes this last quantity at most . Together with the polynomial-approximation error, this contradicts . The required consequently exists. This proves the dense model theorem for a multiplicative test family.
The function is the support function . For a nonempty compact convex set,
so its convex conjugate is the indicator function . Applying the Moreau decomposition,
Multiplication of an indicator function by a positive scalar does not change it, and its proximal operator is the Euclidean projection onto a convex set. Therefore
Take and , so
is the capped simplex. A linear objective over this convex polytope attains its maximum at a zero-one extreme point. Choosing the coordinates at which is largest gives
Equivalently, an exchange of weight from a smaller component to a larger one never decreases the objective. Thus the sum of the largest components is the support function .
Part c now gives
By the projection onto a box-constrained hyperplane, has
Consequently the proximal operator is evaluated by solving this one-dimensional equation for , then substituting the resulting projection.
The sum of the largest components of is the support function of the capped simplex: .