Elliptic boundary value problem Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
An elliptic boundary value problem couples an elliptic differential equation in a domain to boundary conditions. Its weak formulation is often an equation for a bounded bilinear form on a Sobolev space.
Paper 105 1 c Solution 2026-09-24
Write . If is a classical solution, multiply by a smooth function and apply the divergence theorem. The Neumann boundary condition removes the boundary term and givesThe density of smooth functions in a Sobolev space and boundedness of the coefficients extend this identity to every , so is a weak solution.
Conversely, take to be a test function compactly supported in . The weak formulation saysThe fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations gives the equation in . Under the regularity implicit in the stated notion of a classical solution, it holds pointwise. Applying integration by parts again with arbitrary leaveswhere is the trace operator. Traces of smooth functions can be chosen arbitrarily on the boundary, so the boundary fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations gives . Thus is a classical solution.
Paper 105 1 d Solution 2026-09-24
Testing the weak formulation with the constant function proves the necessary compatibility conditionAssume first that is connected and this condition holds. On the mean-zero Sobolev spaceuse the norm . To prove the needed Poincare-Wirtinger inequality, suppose it failed. There would be with and . The Rellich-Kondrachov compactness theorem gives a subsequence converging strongly in and weakly in to a function . Its weak derivative vanishes, so connectedness makes constant; its zero mean makes it zero. This contradicts . Hence is an equivalent Hilbert space norm on .
DefineBoundedness of makes a bounded bilinear form, while uniform ellipticity givesso it is a coercive bilinear form. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Poincare-Wirtinger inequality make a bounded linear functional. The Lax-Milgram theorem supplies a unique satisfying for every mean-zero . For arbitrary , subtract its mean; the omitted constant contributes zero on both sides because and . Thus solves the original problem.
If two solutions exist, their difference satisfies , so uniform ellipticity gives . It is therefore constant on . The solution is unique up to an additive constant, and its mean-zero representative is unique. If is disconnected, the precise condition is on every connected component , and one independent additive constant remains on each component.
Paper 107 1 b Solution 2026-09-24
Suppose and are weak solutions with the same trace, and put . The weak formulation permits itself as a test function, givingThus is almost everywhere constant, and its zero trace makes that constant zero. This proves uniqueness.
The weak identity also says that in the sense of distributions. The Weyl lemma therefore gives and pointwise. The assumed continuity on retains the prescribed boundary values, so the weak solution is the unique classical solution in .
Paper 105 2 b Solution 2026-09-24
Multiply the Poisson equation by and apply Green's first identity. The Dirichlet boundary condition makes the trace of vanish on , while the Neumann boundary condition makes the boundary flux vanish on . Thus the weak formulation is: find such thatwhere
Paper 105 2 c Solution 2026-09-24
First choose a test function . The weak formulation and integration by parts giveThe fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations implies pointwise because and is continuous. The Dirichlet boundary condition on already follows from and continuity of .
For arbitrary , Green's first identity and the interior equation now reduce the weak identity toThe traces of smooth members of can be chosen freely on compact subsets of . Another application of the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations, now on the boundary, gives pointwise on . Hence is a classical solution of the complete mixed boundary value problem.
Paper 105 3 c Solution 2026-09-24
Solve the adjoint transport equationbackward with terminal value zero. Along the characteristic flow map , the required solution isDifferentiation under the integral verifies the equation. If has compact support in , then vanishes for and for , so as required.
When the initial datum is zero, inserting this into the weak formulation givesfor every . Thus almost everywhere. The difference of two bounded weak solutions has zero initial datum, so this proves uniqueness.