Boundary Rossby wave Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-05
A boundary Rossby wave is supported by a buoyancy perturbation or potential-temperature anomaly on a rigid horizontal boundary. Its intrinsic propagation depends on the boundary orientation and basic buoyancy gradient; the upper and lower boundary waves of the Eady model propagate oppositely relative to their local background flows.
Buoyancy displacement variable Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-11-05
In a radially stratified shearing sheet, one can normalize the scalar buoyancy perturbation by writing and . With this convention has dimensions of length, rather than temperature; is thermal diffusivity.
Buoyancy perturbation Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-11-05
A buoyancy perturbation is the departure from a prescribed basic buoyancy field. In a fluid with constant buoyancy frequency , vertical velocity changes it according to .
Hydrostatic balance Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-11-05
Vertical pressure gradient balances gravitational force per unit volume. Subtracting the resting hydrostatic state and using kinematic pressure gives for a Boussinesq approximation buoyancy anomaly. The approximation neglects vertical acceleration; this diagnostic relation is what couples buoyancy perturbation to the vertical pressure profile.
Linearized Boussinesq equations Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-11-05
The Linearized Boussinesq equations describe small velocity, pressure, and buoyancy perturbations about a motionless, stably stratified reference state. With kinematic viscosity , mass diffusivity , and buoyancy frequency , they are
Take eastward , upward , positive wavenumbers , and a real instantaneous amplitude . A common growing factor does not affect the phase geometry. Put and , using the hyperbolic cosine and hyperbolic sine. The prescribed streamfunction is
where
Following a fixed phase gives
Therefore the streamfunction pattern tilts westward with height. The lower boundary leads the upper boundary eastward.
In the conventional quasi-geostrophic streamfunction normalization, hydrostatic balance gives . Therefore
For the phase calculation, multiplication by the constant is immaterial. Define a continuous phase ; this avoids a spurious discontinuity at . Then
The buoyancy perturbation pattern tilts eastward with height, opposite to the streamfunction pattern. At , while , so the two fields are a quarter wavelength apart there.
Both perturbation amplitudes are largest at the boundaries. Indeed,
which increase with . The physical reason is particularly clear through stratified quasi-geostrophic inversion: the Eady model has no interior background potential-vorticity gradient, and a growing normal mode has zero interior potential vorticity anomaly. The independent thermal anomalies reside at the rigid upper and lower boundaries, where meridional motion advects the basic horizontal buoyancy gradient. Each Eady edge wave induces an interior balanced flow that decays away from its boundary on scale . Their interacting, phase-locked combination produces the growing baroclinic instability. Boundary confinement of the thermal sources, rather than a rigid-wall requirement , explains the amplitude pattern.
For a sketch with a quarter-wavelength difference between the boundary streamfunction patterns, choose
An upper positive streamfunction crest is then west of its lower counterpart, where . The buoyancy perturbation crests slope the other way. The quarter-wavelength boundary assumption is used for the streamfunction; differentiating in fixes the buoyancy perturbation and does not generally give it the same boundary phase separation.
Figure 1.
Original Eady model sketch: streamfunction crests tilt westward and buoyancy perturbation crests eastward. Dashed curves follow positive maxima; the streamfunction boundary phase difference is a quarter wavelength.
Details.
The connection to poleward heat transport can be checked without relying on the sketch. The meridional geostrophic flow and buoyancy perturbation are
Average over one zonal wavelength, using equal averages for squared sine and cosine and zero for their product:
In the Northern Hemisphere this is positive: warm anomalies preferentially move northward and cold anomalies southward. For the same eastward-increasing basic thermal wind in the Southern Hemisphere, and the basic buoyancy gradient reverses; the negative northward eddy buoyancy flux is again poleward. For thermal expansion coefficient and specific heat capacity at constant pressure , the corresponding sensible heat flux in a thermal Boussinesq approximation is . The growing amplitude makes this flux grow as . The tilt supplies the correlation absent in an untilted disturbance and reduces the background available potential energy.
The quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation is the leading balanced form of potential-vorticity conservation for an inviscid rotating fluid with stable density stratification, small Rossby number and an adiabatic process for each fluid element. Its parent conservation law is Ertel potential vorticity conservation. Horizontal geostrophic balance, vertical hydrostatic balance, and the beta-plane approximation reduce it to advection of one scalar by the leading horizontal geostrophic flow.
One can see its origin by combining the vertical vorticity equation with the thermal equation. Set , , and . The quasi-geostrophic approximation gives
Here is the buoyancy perturbation relative to the reference stable density stratification, its buoyancy frequency, and the small vertical velocity. The stretching of absolute vorticity in the first equation is offset by the change of stratification represented by the second. More precisely,
The last dot product is zero because thermal-wind balance makes perpendicular to . Adding therefore yields
The constant has no effect on the tendency, but its inclusion makes the connection with absolute vorticity clear. Vertical advection of is beyond the retained order; the vertical velocity has already supplied the stretching and thermodynamic terms.
For a simple balanced weather forecast, the essential cycle is diagnose, advect, invert:
This is an elliptic boundary value problem, not a local algebraic diagnosis. Its solution supplies the next geostrophic flow and, through , the next thermal field. Repeat the cycle to move the balanced weather systems forward.
Interior potential vorticity alone is insufficient: boundary thermal anomalies can induce flow even with zero interior anomaly, as in the Eady model. The method filters fast inertia-gravity waves and is useful for large-scale extratropical weather, while tropical dynamics, convection, moisture, friction and diabatic heating require additional physics. If vertical motion is wanted, the quasi-geostrophic omega equation supplies a further diagnostic calculation.
The quasi-geostrophic approximation isolates slowly evolving, nearly balanced motions in a rotating, stably stratified fluid. Ocean eddies and mid-latitude atmospheric disturbances often have this character: a leading Coriolis force–pressure balance suppresses rapid horizontal acceleration, while hydrostatic balance suppresses rapid vertical acceleration. Small ageostrophic flow nevertheless supplies the vertical motion that changes the leading vorticity. The approximation filters fast inertia-gravity waves while retaining nonlinear transport, vertical shear and Rossby waves.
Use a reference density and remove the background hydrostatic pressure. Let and let the upward buoyancy perturbation be . A vertically varying reference density stratification has . Under the Boussinesq approximation, the inviscid and adiabatic equations are
Here . Density variations are small compared with but retained in the vertical buoyancy force. This is a useful local, incompressible description; a compressible atmosphere needs the corresponding weighted or pressure-coordinate version.
Let horizontal and vertical lengths be , speed be , and take the slow time . Take for definiteness; use in the scale estimates in the opposite hemisphere. The principal small parameter is the Rossby number at a latitude where . For the hydrostatic, strongly stratified regime, and . Retaining both horizontal vorticity and vortex stretching gives the Burger number
The geostrophic balance pressure scale is and the buoyancy perturbation scale is . Hence : buoyancy perturbations produce small displacements relative to the background stratification scale. The ageostrophic flow is and incompressibility then gives . Vertical acceleration is smaller than hydrostatic terms by order in this scaling. Weak forcing or diffusion can be added at the slow order, but neither is present here.
Define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction by . Leading geostrophic balance and hydrostatic balance imply
Differentiating horizontally and vertically gives the thermal-wind balance
Thus vertical shear is determined by horizontal buoyancy gradients. The homogeneous Taylor–Proudman theorem is recovered only when those gradients vanish. Stable stratification allows sloping density surfaces and different geostrophic flow at different levels, without abandoning leading balance.
The Prandtl ratio of scales makes that modification quantitative. Horizontal and vertical terms in balanced potential-vorticity inversion have sizes and . Equality gives
For constant , makes the inversion operator an ordinary three-dimensional Laplacian. Equivalently, an interior balanced disturbance of horizontal size naturally penetrates a depth of order . With this is a thin, vertically sheared structure, rather than the arbitrarily tall homogeneous columns suggested by strict Taylor–Proudman theorem behaviour. This is an aspect-ratio statement, not the diffusivity Prandtl number.
To allow a weak meridional variation of the Coriolis parameter, use the beta plane , with , or equivalently . The small correction to the leading balance is dynamically important on the slow time. Let be vertical relative vorticity and let . At the first nontrivial order, the vertical vorticity equation and buoyancy equation reduce to
Relative-vorticity stretching and tilting are higher order here; planetary-vorticity stretching must remain. Eliminate to expose a materially conserved balanced scalar. Because , the commutator term is exactly zero. For this gives
Adding the two equations proves the quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation
An additive constant such as changes no dynamics. The horizontal streamfunction advection bracket can express this as . Although small departures from balance generated this evolution equation, the leading geostrophic flow itself advects nonlinearly. The stretching term couples horizontal motion to vertical displacement of density surfaces.
This gives the practical advection-and-inversion description. Start with interior three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity, advect it with , and recover from
The stratified quasi-geostrophic inversion is elliptic for positive . It must be supplied with lateral and vertical boundary conditions and any circulation or mean-flow constraints; interior potential vorticity alone is not sufficient. At rigid horizontal lids, makes boundary buoyancy satisfy , and supplies the vertical derivative data for inversion. Boundary buoyancy perturbations can therefore support flow even when the interior anomaly is zero. Once is found, its horizontal derivatives give velocity, its vertical derivative gives buoyancy, and the thermodynamic equation diagnoses . This balanced evolution excludes the independent fast-wave initial data present in the full equations.
Finally, a gradient in supplies a restoring mechanism even in an otherwise uniform fluid. Linearizing about rest with constant , the quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation becomes
Substitution of gives the Rossby wave dispersion
For , its zonal phase speed is westward relative to a resting background. A meridionally displaced parcel retains potential vorticity, so it acquires a relative-vorticity anomaly that induces the velocity tending to return the disturbance. Background shear and stratification modify the full potential-vorticity gradient; they can alter propagation or permit instability. On a constant f-plane the planetary contribution vanishes, but gradients of relative vorticity, boundary buoyancy or topography can still support balanced wave motion. Close enough to the equator that vanishes, this mid-latitude quasi-geostrophic approximation and its scaling must be replaced.
Let be kinematic pressure, with the resting hydrostatic part subtracted, and let be the buoyancy perturbation about background buoyancy . The nonrotating inviscid Boussinesq equations, with no buoyancy diffusion, are
Here the third equation is mass conservation for incompressible flow, and the last expresses buoyancy conservation following a parcel. Linearization about rest removes the products of disturbances. For a plane internal gravity wave proportional to , the resulting Linearized Boussinesq equations become
With and , the first and third equations give . Substitution in vertical momentum and buoyancy gives the dispersion relation
Since the velocity is the time derivative of the displacement field, . Thus the complete buoyancy polarization of a plane internal gravity wave is
Both velocity and displacement are perpendicular to the wavevector; pressure and velocity are in quadrature with buoyancy and displacement.
For upward/rightward phase velocity, choose and . Differentiating this dispersion relation gives the group velocity, while the vector phase velocity points along the wavevector:
Their dot product is zero and . Draw from the tip of : the right-triangle geometry of internal-wave velocities has horizontal hypotenuse . This hypotenuse is distinct from the horizontal phase velocity .
At an instant with real complex amplitude , write . The spatial fields are
The constant-phase lines of an internal gravity wave slope down to the right, with . Buoyancy maxima lie a quarter wavelength from pressure maxima; the oscillating displacement and velocity run along the phase lines. The group velocity points down and right along them, despite upward/rightward motion of the wave phase.
Let , using horizontal averaging over a wavelength. This is the displacement pseudomomentum of an internal gravity wave, whose sign convention is opposite to . For complex coefficients, . The above wave polarization consequently gives
Since , these obey . With weak kinematic viscosity, each leading monochromatic velocity component satisfies , . The dissipative term is therefore , so the supplied averaged balance reduces to
For constant and a steady wave envelope, . As is proportional to squared wave amplitude, viscous attenuation of an internal gravity wave gives
Here , so amplitude decreases below a source at : the source is above the receiving level. The same conclusion follows directly because downward group velocity carries energy from the source downward. Upward phase velocity does not locate the source.
For a slowly varying mean shear flow , the local intrinsic frequency is . A local WKB approximation uses , with varying vertical wavenumber and group velocity. The appropriate transported quantity is wave action, or horizontal wave pseudomomentum ; its vertical flux has viscous loss, and the changing polarization factors must be retained. In particular, is no longer constant.
Near a critical level of an internal gravity wave, , so and . The damping per vertical distance, of order , grows rapidly. The waves are strongly attenuated over a narrow altitude range and transfer momentum to the mean flow there or before reaching the critical level. The inviscid WKB approximation eventually fails; viscosity and possibly internal-wave breaking regulate the small scales.
The basic quasi-geostrophic streamfunction gives , and constant quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity . Define
Because the background has no potential-vorticity gradient, the linear potential-vorticity equation is simply
Its characteristics have constant , so the general solution is . In particular, is the requested arbitrary separated family; one product is not the most general initial field.
Linearizing the vertical velocity requires retaining advection of by . Therefore
The impermeable boundary at imposes
This is conservation of boundary buoyancy, not merely a condition that vanish.
For zero interior potential vorticity, write . With , stratified quasi-geostrophic inversion gives
The decaying solution is
No time dependence has been assumed to obtain this vertical structure. Applying the boundary condition gives , hence
Thus the Eady edge wave travels eastward with horizontal phase velocity for .
The propagation mechanism can be made explicit using boundary parcels. Thermal wind gives the background buoyancy gradient . A small meridional parcel displacement produces boundary buoyancy perturbation . Meanwhile the decaying potential-vorticity inversion gives at the boundary. Consequently there, and the parcel equation becomes
A displaced buoyancy contour therefore induces a velocity field that advances that displacement eastward. No interior potential-vorticity gradient is needed because the boundary buoyancy supplies the invertibility data.
Vortex stretching is what sets the induced flow's vertical reach. In the interior, the zero-potential vorticity condition requires
Boundary isopycnal displacement decreases with height as , so fluid columns are stretched or compressed over depth . Conservation of potential vorticity makes this stretching balance the relative vorticity. The resulting inversion factor gives the propagation speed: stronger density stratification reduces penetration and speed, while larger increases them. Zero interior potential vorticity therefore does not imply zero interior flow.
For imposed boundary vertical velocity, retain the same decaying structure and write
The boundary relation becomes the forced Eady edge wave equation
The integrating factor gives, for ,
The arbitrary homogeneous coefficient sets the initial disturbance. With , this is .
At resonance, , integration instead yields
An initially undisturbed fluid has . The imposed pumping reinforces the same boundary normal mode every cycle, with no dissipative loss, so the linear amplitude grows secularly. The divergence describes resonance of the undamped linear model; sufficiently large wave amplitude invalidates the assumed small-disturbance approximation.
Potential-vorticity inversion is the diagnostic recovery of the flow from its advected vortical scalar, using the balance relation and specified boundary conditions. Its usefulness is a separation of tasks: transport the scalar by the current velocity, invert to find the new velocity, and repeat. The inverse is spatially nonlocal even though the transport law is local. The four models differ chiefly in the operator being inverted and the information needed at boundaries.
In two-dimensional vortex dynamics, planar incompressibility permits , and vertical vorticity is . The curl of inviscid momentum gives
There is no vortex stretching in strictly planar motion, so vorticity is materially conserved. The two-dimensional potential-vorticity inversion is the Poisson equation . On the plane, with suitable integrability and far-field behavior, its Green's function is , giving
Differentiation gives the planar Biot-Savart kernel. Here is a harmonic function fixed by boundary, circulation and far-field data. A rigid impermeable wall is a streamline, so is constant on it; constants or circulations around distinct holes require specification. The vorticity alone cannot distinguish two flows differing by a permitted harmonic contribution, such as a uniform current on an unbounded plane. A constant added to has no physical effect.
In nonrotating layerwise-two-dimensional vortex dynamics, strong stable density stratification constrains motion to almost horizontal layers. In the ideal independent-layer limit, vertical velocity vanishes at leading order, and
hold separately at each fixed . Height is a parameter: the horizontal inverse Laplacian contains no vertical derivative. With background buoyancy , the leading Ertel potential vorticity is , so the materially advected normalized scalar is . The same horizontal Poisson equation is inverted layer by layer, using each layer's boundary data. This is an asymptotic constrained model, not arbitrary three-dimensional Euler motion with vertical velocity set to zero: its validity requires small Froude number and controlled vertical scales. At finite buoyancy frequency, the weak vertical motion and tilted isopycnals restore coupling. The inversion may be independent by layer while the reconstructed fields vary with height. The horizontal Euler equations for an inviscid fluid determine the pressure gradient, while hydrostatic balance relates its vertical derivative to buoyancy.
In shallow-water quasi-geostrophic inversion, begin with the exact shallow-water potential vorticity . Linearizing its anomaly about depth gives, after multiplying by , . For small Rossby number, geostrophic balance gives , while . Keeping the beta plane background gradient gives
Thus is inverted with the modified Helmholtz equation , under the specified boundary and far-field conditions. The velocity follows from and surface elevation from . A horizontal Fourier mode of the anomaly satisfies
The Rossby deformation radius therefore limits the reach of the balanced response. Layer stretching, represented by , is absent from ordinary planar vorticity inversion. Unlike the pure Poisson equation, the finite-deformation operator also responds to the constant part of , which specifies mean elevation rather than an arbitrary streamfunction offset. Specified bottom topography adds a known source to ; it is subtracted along with the background before inversion.
In stratified quasi-geostrophic inversion, continuously varying vertical displacement replaces the shallow layer's single stretching term. For positive and constant nonzero , the three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity is
Geostrophic balance and hydrostatic balance give velocity and buoyancy perturbation . Invert the anisotropic elliptic boundary value problem using interior , prescribed top and bottom buoyancy as Neumann boundary conditions, and the lateral, far-field and global-flow data. Boundary buoyancy evolves by its own material conservation when the boundary is impermeable. It cannot be discarded: the Eady edge wave in the preceding solution has zero interior potential vorticity anomaly but nonzero boundary buoyancy and a nonzero induced flow.
For constant , the stretched coordinates for quasi-geostrophic inversion turn the inversion operator into the three-dimensional Laplacian. Its infinite-space Green's function is in coordinates. Hence a horizontal disturbance of scale communicates vertically over scale , explicitly coupling layers. In a bounded domain with homogeneous difference data, multiplying the difference of two inversions by its streamfunction and applying integration by parts gives
This proves uniqueness up to a constant when the relevant boundary terms vanish; a mean or pressure reference fixes the remaining constant. Compatible boundary fluxes are needed for a purely Neumann boundary-value problem.
Across all four models, inversion provides the induced flow, while scalar transport supplies time evolution. The independent horizontal inverse in the first two models becomes a finite-deformation inverse in shallow water and a vertically coupled elliptic inverse in continuous stratification. The principle applies within the stated balance or constrained model. In the unrestricted Boussinesq equations or shallow water equations, gravity waves and divergent motion can share the same potential vorticity, so the vortical scalar alone does not reconstruct every possible flow.
Here write for the buoyancy perturbation about the resting constant- stratification; the total buoyancy also includes its background gradient . Use kinematic perturbation pressure . The weak-forcing Linearized Boussinesq equations are
Weakness means that perturbation advection is small compared with the retained linear terms. With the specified streamfunction convention, the transverse vorticity is
Differentiate the horizontal momentum equation in and subtract the derivative of vertical momentum. The pressure derivatives cancel, giving
The second equation uses and is the forced internal-wave equation.
For free waves at frequency , the internal gravity wave dispersion relation gives . Thus the horizontal response scale is much larger than the vertical scale. Vertical acceleration is small in the vertical momentum equation, leaving the hydrostatic approximation . Correspondingly the transverse vorticity is predominantly : neglect relative to in the inertial vorticity term. The restoring term must still be retained, since it balances the small time derivatives.
For put , and interpret physical fields as real parts. The reduced equation is
One can solve it while obtaining the buoyancy simultaneously. Define and . The first-order hydrostatic equations become
Hence and obey
Apply the method of characteristics with zero fields in the past. With
the solution is . Consequently the hydrostatic response to a localized horizontal force is
These are exactly the required two characteristic integrals, derived with their relative sign fixed by the buoyancy equation. Quiet-past initial conditions exclude additional freely propagating solutions.
For the consistency check, set , so both integrals run over the fixed range . Differentiation at fixed now gives
This change of variable is important: it includes the time dependence of both the sampled forcing and the moving integration geometry without omitting a term. Each straight path intersects for a time interval of length at most . If , then
The characteristic size of the hydrostatic buoyancy and pressure-gradient balance is , as follows from the analogous bound on in its integral formula. Thus the omitted acceleration has relative scale at most a constant times
Together with the low-frequency assumption, this verifies the requested hydrostatic consistency. It is a comparison of characteristic magnitudes, rather than division by a buoyancy value at a node where both terms may vanish. The capital here is the buoyancy frequency, as printed in the PDF.
For , only contributes. If , every point lies outside the source interval, so both integrals vanish:
This finite propagation cone belongs to the reduced hydrostatic wave equation.
The hypotheses do not require an even forcing, so no single symmetric graph follows for every permitted . For an illustrative smooth even nonnegative profile, is even and is odd. At late time and fixed , if , then
Thus the streamfunction develops a broad nearly level interior response with outgoing fronts, while the buoyancy changes sign across the source and approaches opposite interior plateaus to its left and right. Both vanish beyond the fronts. For , a vertical phase with gives real fields and . The figure plots those profiles up to positive normalization factors, for an even compact forcing increasing slowly from zero.
Figure 1.
Causal streamfunction and buoyancy profiles for a slowly established even localized horizontal force
. Details.
In the Boussinesq approximation, density departures from a constant reference density are small enough to neglect in inertia and mass continuity, but their gravitational effect is retained. Write the total buoyancy acceleration as , choose a hydrostatic background , and set . Thus is the buoyancy perturbation, positive for a parcel lighter than the background at its present height. The squared buoyancy frequency is
Stable stratification has . A small vertical displacement of a parcel conserving its buoyancy gives , explaining the restoring acceleration and the name of .
Let be pressure with the background hydrostatic pressure removed, , and the material derivative. The ideal, nonrotating Boussinesq equations are
The last equation is equivalent to . There is neither viscosity nor buoyancy diffusion. The reference density occurs in the pressure normalization, while the small density anomaly occurs only through buoyancy.
For the two-dimensional disturbance, linearization about rest gives
A plane internal gravity wave proportional to therefore satisfies
These internal-wave polarization relations and the dispersion relation determine the individual responses in parts i and ii. A radiating response has no incoming internal gravity wave from ; an evanescent response is bounded there. The harmonic solutions describe the response after excluding arbitrary initial transients.
For the localized oscillatory boundary, define and . Both signs of vertical wavenumber must radiate into . Their horizontal wavenumber is , so the positive- contribution involves and the negative- contribution involves . Consequently the complex horizontal velocity is
Taking its real part proves
The positive- internal-wave polarization has and the negative- one has . Hence
In particular, , so the boundary condition is recovered exactly. This is two-beam radiation from a localized oscillating boundary.
Take a smooth localized profile, for example . Its effective support is a neighbourhood of width a few ; increasing that neighbourhood makes the tails arbitrarily small. The boundary displacement is to first order, so at it is flat and moving at maximum speed. At that instant,
There are two narrow oblique beams centered on and . Away from their overlap, the velocity is parallel to the relevant beam, in the directions and . The figure uses and measures velocities in units of .
Figure 1.
Velocity in two internal-wave beams when the oscillating boundary is flat and moving fastest
. Details.
At other phases the terms contribute. For the positive-frequency convention above, is the Hilbert transform of ; it generally has longer tails than . Thus even when the boundary is nearly stationary, the interior need not be stationary or confined to the bright cores shown here. Half a period later all velocities reverse. The beam directions remain the same, but the instantaneous velocity profile and its quadrature component change.
A short pulse has a broad frequency spectrum. Frequencies below produce outgoing internal gravity wave packets with frequency-dependent ray slopes ; frequencies above contribute an evanescent near-boundary response. Moreover the group velocity depends on wavelength as well as direction. The radiated packet therefore spreads into a dispersive fan or wake, with different frequencies traveling at different angles and different scales separating along those directions. After the forcing ends the propagating packet travels away, rather than maintaining the two permanently driven monochromatic beams.
Use the streamfunction convention , , and take . With , the material derivative is . This convention differs from the horizontal quasi-geostrophic streamfunction convention used below. The nonlinear Boussinesq equations are
The component of vorticity is . Differentiate the first momentum equation in and subtract the derivative of the second. The pressure terms cancel; the derivatives of the advecting velocity cancel by . Thus , or
Conservation of total buoyancy, with background gradient , gives
Both equations retain the nonlinear advection terms.
Write , with , and take the background buoyancy anomaly to be zero. The linear equations for are
For a normal mode , the second equation gives . Substitute this into the first to obtain the Taylor–Goldstein equation
Here and the calculation is initially away from critical levels . The first term is the restoring effect of stable buoyancy on vertically displaced parcels. The second comes from advection of the background vorticity gradient : a displacement creates a vorticity anomaly, whose induced velocity acts back on the displacement. This is the shear-flow counterpart of a Rossby wave restoring mechanism; its sign can also permit instability, so it is not invariably stabilizing.
Rigid boundaries imply , hence . For a real, regular normal mode, multiply the Taylor–Goldstein equation by , integrate, and integrate its second derivative by parts. The endpoint term vanishes, leaving
For a smooth real dispersion branch, differentiate this identity with respect to . The stated stationarity of removes the term involving , so . Direct differentiation at fixed gives
Since the frequency is , the group velocity is , and therefore
This is variational group velocity of a Taylor-Goldstein mode. Singular critical levels or a vanishing denominator require separate limiting analysis; no stationarity proof is needed here.
For the sinusoidal profiles, choose . In the interior,
The profile ratios extend to the endpoints in this reduced equation. Thus always gives a nonzero real , with . For this normal mode,
The denominator in the group velocity expression is . It follows that
Although vanishes at the endpoints, this weighted integral is finite; the vanishing of supplies the required cancellation. The formula is the limiting derivative approached from the regular real branch with , before any interior critical level is encountered.
If instead and are constant, still take . The same vertical eigenfunctions satisfy the Taylor–Goldstein equation, now with
There is no value of guaranteed to give real for arbitrary positive parameters: if , all these squared wavenumbers are negative. A nonzero real exists exactly when ; equality gives only the degenerate , limit. For a real branch the same group velocity calculation gives .
To test exact nonlinear validity, take a real normal mode and its corresponding buoyancy perturbation , where . Because
the quadratic vorticity self-advection is zero: . The quadratic buoyancy self-advection, however, is
This nonlinear exactness test for a stratified streamfunction mode distinguishes the cases. For constant , is constant, so both quadratic terms vanish. The background-mode terms already satisfy the linear equations, hence the constant-profile modes are exact finite-amplitude solutions of the ideal Boussinesq equations. Pressure can be recovered from the momentum equations: the vorticity equation supplies their compatibility condition in this simply connected strip.
For the sinusoidal profiles, has a nonzero derivative in the interior. For every nonzero and nonzero real , is not identically zero; it produces a second horizontal harmonic that is absent from the proposed solution. Thus none of these nontrivial sinusoidal-profile modes is an exact finite-amplitude solution. A field is merely an added horizontal shear with no vertical motion and is a degenerate exception to the wave calculation, not a propagating member of it.
Define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction by . Leading horizontal geostrophic balance, , gives . The hydrostatic approximation gives , hence
Thus is the material derivative along the leading geostrophic flow, and the vertical derivative of pressure determines the buoyancy perturbation. This also gives thermal wind: and .
The balanced regime is favored by small Rossby number, a shallow aspect ratio, and a Burger number of order one. Equivalently the stratified Froude number is small. On a beta plane, require , and take slow, initially balanced motion away from the equator. Under the traditional approximation, the horizontal Coriolis force generated by vertical velocity is small because vertical velocity is small, while the vertical rotational force is small compared with the leading hydrostatic pressure and gravity terms. Strong stratification and small aspect ratio justify retaining only the vertical component of Earth's rotation in this regime; this argument is not uniform near the equator.
Put . The buoyancy equation gives . Substitution into the vertical vorticity equation yields
There is an important commutator cancellation. With ,
Also for . Adding terms therefore proves potential-vorticity conservation:
This is the three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity.
At an impermeable stationary lower boundary , the kinematic condition is . For small elevation and slope, evaluate this at the reference level to leading order. Combining it with the buoyancy equation gives the rigid-boundary buoyancy condition for quasi-geostrophic waves
The quantity in parentheses is the boundary displacement plus its buoyancy-equivalent displacement.
Now take constant and the mean quasi-geostrophic streamfunction . Its mean buoyancy perturbation is , consistent with thermal wind, and its interior potential vorticity is constant. In the boundary condition, the perturbation velocity advects the mean boundary buoyancy gradient. Keeping this contribution gives
In particular the term must not be omitted.
The linear interior potential-vorticity equation is . Starting with zero interior perturbation potential vorticity, and with forcing only through the boundary, it remains zero. For a steady solution this is also the regular zero-interior-PV choice, continued through any isolated zero of . The inversion equation for a horizontal mode is
The printed convention takes ; for either hemisphere the decay rate is defined using . Boundedness aloft selects the decaying mode. Write
with real part understood. The linear boundary condition becomes
For , a steady quasi-geostrophic mountain wave is therefore
On , its real meridional velocity is
For the positive-parameter convention and , the velocity minimum lies one quarter wavelength downstream of each topographic maximum; its maximum lies one quarter wavelength downstream of each topographic minimum. If the velocity prefactor changes sign, maxima and minima interchange. The condition alone does not fix that prefactor if is allowed to be negative. The upper panel shows the positive-current convention.
Figure 1.
Meridional velocity relative to topography for a steady mountain wave and a resonantly growing edge wave
. Details.
At , the free boundary Eady edge wave has zero frequency in the ground frame. If , a steady amplitude cannot satisfy the forced amplitude equation. With , integration gives
Consequently
The symbol multiplying here is the horizontal wavenumber , as in the PDF. Taking the real part and differentiating in gives
For , positive , and , the meridional-velocity minima coincide with topographic maxima, and its maxima with topographic minima. This is the lower panel. The change from quadrature to opposition is the phase of a resonantly forced topographic edge wave.
The stationary relief continuously excites a boundary Rossby wave whose intrinsic propagation exactly cancels mean advection. The forcing therefore remains coherent with that wave; with no damping or radiation loss for this trapped mode, its linear amplitude grows secularly. This is a resonant topographic quasi-geostrophic wave. Unlimited growth is a conclusion of the linear idealization: eventually the small-disturbance approximation fails.
The assertion that resonance must be unsteady needs nonzero forcing. If , then and the boundary current does not cross the relief; if , the forcing also vanishes. In either case the zero disturbance is a steady solution even if . For example, choose , , and ; this is a concrete exception to an unconditional resonance claim. When both horizontal wavenumbers vanish, and the stated decaying-wave ansatz itself does not apply.
In the Boussinesq approximation, replace density by a constant reference density in inertia and incompressible flow, retaining the small density departure only in the gravitational force. Write and subtract the resting hydrostatic pressure. The upward buoyancy perturbation acceleration and squared buoyancy frequency are
Thus stable density stratification has . Let henceforth denote the pressure anomaly divided by . The ideal, nonrotating Boussinesq equations are
The buoyancy equation follows by materially conserving the total buoyancy , where ; it does not assume constant .
For an -periodic flow of period , define . An infinite-domain average with vanishing end contributions works as well. The necessary pressure condition is no mean zonal pressure gradient, : periodic pressure satisfies it, whereas a pressure containing a term proportional to does not. Use incompressible flow to write the zonal momentum equation in conservative form,
Averaging its zonal derivative terms yields the exact Reynolds stress relation
For two-dimensional small disturbances about rest, the Linearized Boussinesq equations are , , , and . Differentiate the two momentum equations to eliminate pressure: . Differentiating in and using gives . One further time derivative gives
The equation remains valid for . No vertical derivative of was taken: .
For constant and , a plane internal gravity wave has
Both signs give the prescribed lower-boundary velocity. The radiation condition excludes energy arriving from infinity. At positive frequency, the vertical group velocity is
For a source below the fluid, energy must propagate upward, so the outgoing solution has , even though its vertical phase velocity is downward.
To obtain this selection causally, let and , and replace the constant amplitude by . The method of multiple scales treats as independent during differentiation: the carrier derivatives hold fixed, while holds fixed and holds fixed. Only after differentiating do we restrict to , . Acting on the complex wave, the operators become
With , the wave equation has residual
The zeroth-order term is the dispersion relation; the first-order term vanishes precisely when
If is the switched-on boundary amplitude, with for , the outgoing envelope is for . Its characteristics carry the boundary signal into initially undisturbed fluid. If , characteristics instead arrive from the upper half-space; zero initial disturbances and no incoming signal cannot establish the proposed boundary-forced wavetrain. This is the internal-wave envelope radiation condition.
The leading incompressible flow polarization gives . Hence, to second order in amplitude and leading order in the slow modulation,
There is no meridional transport here. Envelope transport gives , so an initially vanishing mean develops as
These are the leading expressions for internal-wave momentum deposition; higher slow-modulation corrections to the stress are beyond the displayed approximation. In particular, a spatially uniform fully established wavetrain has zero stress divergence, but the front has already produced its mean flow.
The mean wave energy density per unit mass follows from :
Thus . In the original frame the mean kinetic energy is . In a frame translating at , the undisturbed velocity is , and the change in mean kinetic energy is . Indeed at this order behind the front. Mean-flow energy is therefore essential at the same order as wave energy in the translating frame. This follows also from the frame transformation of energy, up to the fixed background constant, and is why conservation of momentum cannot be omitted from the moving-frame conservation of energy budget.
A precise stratification–rotation analogy uses constant , ideal fluid, and independence of one horizontal coordinate. For the stratified system take , , and allow prescribed forces . The possibly nonlinear Boussinesq equations are
For the unstratified system choose right-handed coordinates , rotation , and . Its rotating Euler equations, with the static gravitational and centrifugal contributions absorbed into the background pressure, are
where . The identification is
Then , , and , proving the component-by-component equivalence. In particular, buoyancy perturbation maps to transverse rotating velocity, and stratified horizontal velocity maps to rotation-axis velocity. The mapping permits arbitrary prescribed forces in the two-dimensional plane, but no transverse force: a transverse force in the rotating problem would create a source in the stratified buoyancy equation. A transverse stratified force would also invalidate . Constant is essential to this constant-rotation equivalence.
A physical free surface introduces extra structure beyond the interior equations. After subtracting hydrostatic pressure, its zero total pressure condition gives to first order, together with the kinematic condition for the stratified vertical displacement. The mapping takes this normal velocity into , whereas an actual rotating free surface normal to its physical vertical has normal velocity and a displacement along . The image of the stratified horizontal surface is a vertical surface in the rotating coordinates. Consequently the physical free-surface problems are not analogous, although deliberately mapped rigid boundaries or mathematical boundary data can be.
For the first prescribed force, the steady linear stratified equations are satisfied by
Real parts are understood. The horizontal pressure gradient balances the force; the vertical pressure gradient is balanced by buoyancy; and satisfies buoyancy conservation and incompressible flow. Thus neither nor is fixed by the steady equations alone.
Initial rest and switching on in the unbounded fluid remove this ambiguity by causal pressure adjustment by internal waves. Work with the coefficient and let be the horizontal Fourier transform of . For an abrupt switch at time zero, elimination in the linear equations gives
At the bracket cancels the apparent singularity at every finite time. The persistent pressure term is the symmetric antiderivative of the force: the inverse transform of , interpreted as a Cauchy principal value, is . The oscillatory part propagates away. To see why its zero-frequency part does not leave an arbitrary offset, note that with ; its long-wave contribution consists of oppositely moving fronts. At fixed , the two far-field values of are and , whose average is zero. Nonzero horizontal wavenumbers give dispersive transients that decay locally. Smooth finite-duration switching changes the transient, not this selected steady limit. Therefore
A spatially constant pressure gauge is immaterial. The long-wave group velocity gives the adjustment scale: the elapsed time since switching must satisfy and , and exceed the switching duration. These are asymptotic conditions, not an assertion of exact equilibration after a finite time; the full dispersion relation allows tails. The same long-wave limit gives if desired. Equal-amplitude outward fronts leave opposite pressure offsets and the same velocity on their two sides.
For the force depending instead on , any steady linear horizontal momentum balance requires and . Their mixed derivatives disagree wherever , since but . Hence no steady linear velocity field can satisfy the equations, irrespective of whether it is -independent. This statement concerns the linearized problem; nonlinear inertial balances were excluded by the assumptions.
For an unsteady solution put and take . Its horizontal divergence is zero. The pressure derivatives needed in momentum balance are
Their compatibility is exactly
Thus the Poisson equation supplies an actual pressure and the proposed velocity solves both momentum equations; the vertical momentum and buoyancy equations hold because . This flow grows linearly in time, so it remains a valid small-disturbance prediction only while its velocities are small.
As with total force fixed, . Set . Away from the source , and decay at both ends requires . Integrating across the source gives the jump . Since this jump is , , so
This verifies the distributional source as well as the decay condition.
The corresponding rotating problem is not expected to reproduce this evanescent accelerating flow. Its forcing varies in , precisely the coordinate whose independence was required in the stratification–rotation analogy. Moreover, maps to the rotation-axis coordinate . At small Rossby number, the Taylor–Proudman theorem gives in the unforced exterior regions. Such nonzero columns cannot decay with , hence cannot reproduce an tail. There is also a direct unsteady obstruction to copying the proposed flow: in a homogeneous fluid rotating about the mapped axis, a mode with nonzero axial wavenumber has inertial wave frequency of magnitude , rather than the zero-frequency horizontal vortical response of the stratified problem. The steady or slowly varying exterior rotating response must be columnar or accompanied by outgoing inertial waves; the decaying stratified solution is outside the partial analogy.
For an exponentially growing normal mode with , . Such a complex cannot equal the real basic velocity anywhere, so the interior equation forces at every height. Decay then fixes the unique vertical structure , and the lower-boundary condition fixes , which is real. This contradiction proves the absence of exponential instability in the semi-infinite Eady model:
For , there is no advective frequency in the linear interior equation, so an exponentially growing mode would again have . The wall buoyancy equation then forces , which the nonzero decaying exponential cannot satisfy. Thus these modes do not provide a missing growing branch. This conclusion rules out exponential eigenmode growth, not every possible transient response or singular neutral potential vorticity disturbance.
With a second rigid boundary at , the same uniform-shear flow is the Eady model. Both boundaries carry buoyancy perturbations and support Boundary Rossby waves. Their intrinsic propagation directions oppose one another relative to their respective local basic flows. At suitable wavelengths their interacting fields can phase-lock and release basic-state potential energy, producing baroclinic instability. The single-boundary system lacks that second interacting boundary wave.
For a direct comparison, write and . The vertical solution between the two boundaries is , and their buoyancy conditions are
Eliminating gives the finite-depth Eady dispersion relation
The bracket is negative for , so those modes with have a growing and a decaying member. At short wavelengths the two edge waves interact weakly and the frequencies are real. In the semi-infinite limit, the lower-wave root tends to , recovering the neutral result above.
The WKB approximation treats the vertical wavenumber as locally constant over one vertical wavelength. Write , with and . For the stationary internal-wave WKB solution, away from singular or turning levels. A small terrain slope and small perturbations are also needed for Linearized Boussinesq equations.
Let be the perturbation fluid pressure divided by reference mass density, and the buoyancy perturbation. The steady Linearized Boussinesq equations and incompressibility condition are
For an component, elimination gives , and . Substitution into vertical momentum gives the exact stationary Taylor–Goldstein equation
The leading WKB approximation therefore identifies
The kinematic boundary condition fixes the horizontal wavenumber to for the sinusoidal forcing.
For explicit heights assume a constant positive buoyancy frequency , , and . The latter is a large gradient Richardson number. The linear shear flow has , so the propagation condition is .
For , the first obstruction is the critical level of an internal gravity wave at
As , . The critical-height approach of a stationary wave in linear shear has upward group velocity , so the travel time to diverges: the height is a supremum, approached in the ideal ray model. Here , which can remain small; it would be incorrect to say that the short-wavelength WKB approximation necessarily fails solely because diverges. Nevertheless and displacement , so a finite disturbance eventually violates linearity. Dissipation and overturning also matter near this singular level.
For , the turning height of a stationary wave in linear shear is
At , and the WKB approximation fails. An Airy function matching region describes reflection and an upper evanescent wave. Thus is the highest height of vertical propagation, rather than a sharp cut-off of every disturbance.
The problem initially allows to vary. Without the extra constant- assumption, replace the explicit turning height by the first root of encountered on a propagating branch. A declining can cause a turning level before the negative-shear critical level. The two closed-form heights require the stated constant-stratification assumption.
Let denote the fluid pressure perturbation divided by the reference mass density, and let be the buoyancy perturbation. The buoyancy frequency satisfies . Linearization requires small boundary slope , small displacements compared with the vertical scales of the disturbance and background, and advection small compared with the oscillatory acceleration. For a propagating internal gravity wave this includes ; boundary slope alone is insufficient when . The Boussinesq approximation also requires small relative mass density differences over the region of interest. These conditions must hold for the resulting disturbance, including any amplification by resonance.
The inviscid Linearized Boussinesq equations and linear kinematic boundary condition are
Write the velocity field as . Incompressibility and horizontal momentum balance give
The vertical momentum balance therefore yields
For a real vertical wavenumber , this gives the dispersion relation
When , define . The radiation condition selects , because energy must leave the boundary upward. The boundary-forced internal gravity wave is
Its wavevector is , its phase velocity is , and its group velocity is
Thus the phase velocity points down and right, while the group velocity points up and right. They are perpendicular. Internal-wave polarization makes the particle motion an oscillation along the group velocity direction, with zero first-order mean transport. The constant-phase lines of an internal gravity wave are also parallel to the group velocity. Their inclination above the horizontal satisfies .
When , set . Boundedness at infinity selects the evanescent wave
The horizontal and vertical velocity components are in quadrature: fluid particles describe small ellipses, and the response decays over . There is no upward time-averaged energy flux, because and are in quadrature. A real vertical group velocity is not defined for this evanescent wave. The pattern travels horizontally with phase velocity .
For the response is the evanescent wave with ; the ratios should not be used. At the cutoff , the bounded harmonic solution has , : it neither decays nor has nonzero upward group velocity. It is the limiting cutoff response, rather than a localized radiating disturbance. A uniform nonzero buoyancy frequency in an infinitely deep Boussinesq approximation is itself a local idealization of the background mass density.
Figure 1.
Propagating and evanescent responses
. Details.
The arrows distinguish the phase velocity, group velocity, and oscillatory particle motion of the internal gravity wave. The right panel shows the decay envelope and particle ellipses of the evanescent wave.