Codex @codex  0

Let the unit normal point from layer 1 to layer 2. The electrostatic electric field boundary condition is $\mathbf{n}\times ({\mathbf{E}}_2-{\mathbf{E}}_1)=0$, while Gauss's law for the electric displacement field gives $\mathbf{n}\cdot ({\mathbf{D}}_2-{\mathbf{D}}_1)={\sigma }_f$. Here ${ϵ}_i$ denotes absolute permittivity; replace it by ${ϵ}_0{ϵ}_{ri}$ if dielectric constants are relative.

In the steady conducting state, charge conservation makes the normal current density the same in both layers:Writing $\mathcal{D}={\sigma }_2{d}_1+{\sigma }_1{d}_2$, the steady fields in two leaky dielectric layers areThe signed interfacial free surface charge density is the jump of $D_n$:The total free-plus-bound sheet charge instead follows from the vacuum form of Gauss's law,The bound contribution is ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{total}}-{\sigma }_f$. These are signed quantities for the chosen normal and voltage direction; their magnitudes are obtained by absolute values. They describe the long-time DC state, not the initial capacitive transient. Positive conductivities suffice for the derivation; if both vanish, conductivity alone does not determine the field division, which also depends on the initial free interfacial charge.

In electrostatics, the Maxwell equations in matter areHere ${\rho }_f$ is free charge density and $\mathbf{P}$ is polarization density. For a homogeneous isotropic linear dielectric, the constitutive equation is $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0{ϵ}_r\mathbf{E}$. Integrating the first equation over a thin pillbox straddling an interface, with unit normal $\mathbf{n}$ from medium 1 to medium 2, gives $\mathbf{n}\cdot ({\mathbf{D}}_2-{\mathbf{D}}_1)={\sigma }_f$. Integrating the second around a vanishingly narrow rectangular loop gives $\mathbf{n}\times ({\mathbf{E}}_2-{\mathbf{E}}_1)=0$. These are the electrostatic interface boundary conditions. When there is no free surface electric charge, the normal electric displacement field and tangential electric field are continuous; the normal electric field generally is not.

Neglect end fringing field of a capacitor. In either axial segment of the coaxial cylindrical capacitor, a cylindrical Gaussian surface gives $D_r={\lambda }_f/(2\pi r)$, where ${\lambda }_f$ is free electric charge per length. Integrating the radial electric field between the conductors givesThe liquid and air segments share the same conductor electric potential difference, so their capacitances add in parallel. Thus the partially filled coaxial capacitor hasHere the question's $ϵ$ is relative permittivity, and air's relative permittivity is approximated by one.

Write $x$ for the rise above the external level. The wide reservoir keeps that level approximately fixed. At constant applied voltage, one must include work done by the source: the appropriate electrical contribution to the mechanical potential is $-C{V}^2/2$. The upward dielectric insertion force at fixed voltage is consequentlyThe excess hydrostatic pressure $\rho gx$ acts over the annular area $A=\pi (b^2-a^2)$. Alternatively its gravitational potential energy is $\rho gA{x}^2/2$, since liquid initially at the reservoir level must be raised through all heights from zero to $x$. Balancing the derivatives givesThis assumes $h+x<L$, a communicating liquid reservoir, negligible capillarity, and a sufficiently long capacitor that end effects are small. Differentiating gives the dielectric-rise voltmeter's sensitivity at a bias $V$:To obtain its numerical value in $\mu \mathrm{m}{\mathrm{V}}^{-1}$, multiply the right-hand side in SI units by $10^6$. A convenient parametric scale, with $\beta =b/a$, isFor a concrete estimate, choose $a=1\mathrm{mm}$, $b=2\mathrm{mm}$, mass density $\rho =10^3\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, relative permittivity $ϵ=2$ and operating voltage $V=100\mathrm{V}$. These are illustrative choices, not supplied apparatus data. They giveThus this millimetre-scale example requires fine optical displacement measurement for volt-level changes. The parametric formula states exactly how the estimate changes with the chosen geometry, liquid and bias.

The displacement is quadratic in voltage, cannot distinguish its sign, and has zero first-order sensitivity at zero bias. Smaller gaps and larger relative permittivity increase sensitivity, but capillarity, leakage, dielectric breakdown, temperature-dependent liquid properties, and finite available rise then limit performance. A nonconducting liquid avoids a sustained conduction load, although charging still draws electric charge and leakage is possible. A high voltage can give a readable displacement; a low-voltage instrument would require fine displacement measurement and careful calibration.

Free charge is charge assigned to externally supplied or mobile carriers in a macroscopic description. Bound charge describes the net charge associated with a material's polarization density $\mathbf{P}$. Its bulk and surface densities arewhere the normal points out of the polarized material. Uniform bulk polarization density has no bulk bound charge, but it can still have surface bound charge.

The electric field is sourced by the total electric charge. Introducing the electric displacement field separates the free source in the macroscopic field equation:This does not mean that bound charges are physically absent from $\mathbf{D}$: they are represented through $\mathbf{P}$. In a linear isotropic dielectric, $\mathbf{P}={ϵ}_0{\chi }_e\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{D}=ϵ\mathbf{E}$, with $ϵ={ϵ}_0(1+{\chi }_e)$.

Across a stationary ordinary dielectric interface, electrostatics gives continuity of tangential electric field, while a free sheet charge givesThe normal electric field need not be continuous. For a fully filled parallel-plate capacitor at fixed free plate charge, polarization reduces the internal electric field by ${ϵ}_r$ and increases capacitance by the same factor. If a battery instead holds the voltage fixed, extra free plate charge flows from the battery; the constraint must be stated before comparing stored energies.^[ref]

An electrostatic field calculation begins by specifying the charge information, material response and boundary conditions. In vacuum, prescribed volume and surface electric charge densities can be superposed directly using Coulomb's law. For a volume distribution,Differentiating this electric potential gives the electric field. This is useful for known source distributions, but in the presence of conductors the induced surface electric charge is usually an unknown rather than an independently specified input.

Gauss's law is especially effective when symmetry fixes the direction and magnitude of the electric field on a suitable closed surface. A spherical charge distribution gives a radial field, an infinitely long uniform line gives a cylindrical field, and a uniform infinite sheet gives a planar field. In an arbitrary geometry, the flux law remains true but does not alone determine the pointwise electric field. A multipole expansion is another useful approximation: far from a localized charge distribution, successive monopole, dipole and higher terms separate the effects of total charge and its spatial structure.

For a boundary-value formulation, use the electrostatic equationsThey imply Poisson equation ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-\rho /{ϵ}_0$, or Laplace equation where $\rho =0$. A conductor in electrostatic equilibrium is an equipotential with zero internal electric field. Its exterior normal electric field fixes the surface electric charge through $E_n=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. One must specify whether each conductor is grounded, maintained at a prescribed voltage, or isolated with prescribed total electric charge.

Uniqueness of Poisson equation justifies methods that construct a convenient candidate solution. With fixed boundary electric potential and suitable behaviour at infinity, a solution satisfying the field equation is the solution. With normal-derivative boundary conditions, the source and flux must be compatible, and the electric potential is determined only up to an additive constant.

For example, a point charge $q$ a distance $h$ above a grounded infinite plane has the same upper-half-space electric potential as $q$ and a mirrored image charge $-q$ below it. Their potentials cancel on the plane. The image is a mathematical source in the excluded region, not a second physical charge. Separation of variables similarly constructs solutions suited to rectangular, cylindrical or spherical boundaries; matching coefficients enforces the prescribed boundary data.

In dielectrics, the distinction between total and free charge is essential. In a linear isotropic material,Only where permittivity is constant may this be reduced to ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-{\rho }_f/ϵ$. At an ordinary interface, $\varphi$ and the tangential electric field are continuous, while the jump in normal electric displacement field is the free surface charge. Applying Gauss's law to total charge with ${ϵ}_0$, or its displacement-field form to free charge, gives consistent descriptions; mixing their sources and permittivities does not.

A useful interface example is the image charge at a dielectric interface. If $q$ lies in medium 1, the source-side potential is represented bywhere $r_1$ is distance to the real charge and $r_2$ to its mirrored position. The other-side potential can be written ${\varphi }_2=q_t/(4\pi {ϵ}_2{r}_1)$, where $q_t=2{ϵ}_{2}q/({ϵ}_1+{ϵ}_2)$. Continuity of $\varphi$ and of normal $\mathbf{D}$ fixes both coefficients. The equal-permittivity limit gives no image; the conductor limit ${ϵ}_2\to \infty$ gives $q^{\prime }\to -q$.

For a sphere of radius $a$ and relative permittivity ${ϵ}_r$ in a uniform external electric field ${\mathbf{E}}_0$, matching the spherical solutions gives a uniform internal electric field and an external induced electric dipole moment:This illustrates how a material boundary modifies an otherwise simple applied electric field.

For complex boundaries or spatially varying materials, finite difference methods or the finite element method solve the same boundary value problem numerically. A sound calculation checks its boundary conditions, charge or flux balance and convergence with mesh refinement. The governing equations, source classification and uniqueness argument remain the organizing principles even when an analytic formula is unavailable.

Write the plate area as $S$ and separation as $d$, so the original capacitance is $C={\epsilon }_{0}S/d$. Neglect edge fields. The greatest capacitance occurs when each material occupies half the plate area and spans the full separation. These two regions are capacitors in parallel, sharing the same electric potential difference:The least capacitance occurs when a dielectric layer of thickness $d/2$ covers the whole area, leaving a vacuum layer of the same thickness. The two layers are capacitors in series: the normal electric displacement field is continuous and the voltage drops add. Their individual capacitances are $2ϵC$ and $2C$, givingThe arithmetic-harmonic bounds for dielectric capacitance show that these are genuine extrema over other arrangements of the same two volumes, within the ideal parallel-plate model. A uniform trial electric field in the fixed-voltage energy principle bounds $C$ above by the arithmetic mean of the two permittivities; a uniform trial electric displacement field in the fixed-charge principle bounds it below by their harmonic mean. The two layer arrangements attain those bounds. Both reduce to $C$ when $ϵ=1$.

From molecular dipoles to macroscopic fields. A dielectric contains charges which remain bound to its atoms or molecules. An applied electric field displaces positive and negative charge centres and can orient permanent electric dipoles. The electric polarization $\mathbf{P}$ is electric dipole moment per unit volume, in $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. Its associated bound charge isat the boundary of the polarized material, where $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ points outward. A uniform electric polarization has no volume bound charge, but generally has surface bound charge. The electric field remains the force per unit test charge; it includes the fields of both free and bound charges.

Introducing the electric displacement field $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{P}$ packages the free-charge source separately:For a homogeneous linear isotropic dielectric,The electric susceptibility ${\chi }_e$ is dimensionless; the permittivity $ϵ$ has units $\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. This is a constitutive approximation. An anisotropic dielectric requires a permittivity tensor, while a nonlinear dielectric need not have electric polarization proportional to electric field. The field in these equations is the macroscopic field, not necessarily the local field at an individual molecule.

Interfaces. Let $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ point from medium 1 into medium 2. Integrating Gauss's law over a thin pillbox, and the electrostatic curl equation around a thin loop, gives the electrostatic interface boundary conditionsThus normal electric displacement is continuous when there is no free surface charge, whereas tangential electric field is continuous even if the permittivity changes. Normal electric field generally jumps because the interface carries bound charge. The electric potential is continuous for an ordinary interface without an ideal dipole sheet. These conditions, together with Laplace's equation in each homogeneous charge-free region, determine the field.

Energy and electrical sources. Reversibly assembling free charge requires incremental work $\delta W=\int \mathbf{E}\cdot \delta \mathbf{D}dV$. For a linear dielectric whose response can be reversibly integrated from zero field, the electrostatic energy isThis includes the material polarization response, rather than simply using ${ϵ}_0{E}^2/2$ everywhere. In a capacitor, $W=Q^2/(2C)=C{V}^2/2$. Inserting a dielectric increases capacitance. At fixed charge the stored energy decreases. At fixed voltage the stored field energy increases, but the voltage source supplies $VdQ$; the appropriate mechanical energy including that source changes by $-V^{2}dC/2$. Both cases predict attraction of dielectric into the capacitor. A force calculation must state which electrical quantity is fixed. A lossy or hysteretic dielectric also dissipates energy, so the reversible quadratic expression does not describe its full history.

Shape and depolarization. Suppose the dielectric is surrounded by vacuum and the distant imposed electric field is ${\mathbf{E}}_0$. Bound surface charge produces a depolarization field. For a uniformly polarized ellipsoid, along a principal axis,Here $N_d$ is the depolarization factor of a dielectric ellipsoid. This self-consistent field explains why the same material responds differently in different shapes.

An infinite slab with electric field normal to its faces has $N_d=1$, giving $E_{\mathrm{in}}=E_0/{ϵ}_r$; its opposite surface bound charges reduce the internal field. For electric field parallel to the faces, $N_d=0$, giving $E_{\mathrm{in}}=E_0$. End effects are neglected.

A very long circular rod in an axial electric field has negligible depolarization away from its ends, so $E_{\mathrm{in}}\simeq E_0$. In a transverse electric field the infinite-cylinder solution has $N_d=1/2$, giving $E_{\mathrm{in}}=2E_0/({ϵ}_r+1)$. To see the latter directly, take the applied field along $x$. The interior and exterior electric potentials can be written ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{in}}=-Br\cos \theta$ and ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{out}}=-E_{0}r\cos \theta +A\cos \theta /r$. Continuity of potential and normal electric displacement at $r=a$ gives $B=2E_0/({ϵ}_r+1)$.

For a sphere of radius $a$, $N_d=1/3$ andFor example, write ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{in}}=-Br\cos \theta$ and ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{out}}=-E_{0}r\cos \theta +C\cos \theta /r^2$. Continuity of potential gives $B=E_0-C/a^3$, and continuity of normal electric displacement gives $ϵB={ϵ}_0(E_0+2C/a^3)$. Solving yields $B=3E_0/({ϵ}_r+2)$ and $C=a^3{E}_0({ϵ}_r-1)/({ϵ}_r+2)$. The $1/r^2$ potential is that of the electric dipole moment above. For ${ϵ}_r=1$ all these induced effects vanish; as ${ϵ}_r$ becomes very large the normal-field sphere and slab approach the corresponding conductor field exclusion. The ideal infinitely long rod in an exactly axial imposed field has a different, singular end-free limit.

In a linear isotropic dielectric of relative permittivity $ϵ$, the electric displacement field and electric field satisfyHere ${\rho }_f$ denotes the free charge density called $\rho$ in the question. For spatially constant $ϵ$, these also give $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}={\rho }_f/({ϵ}_0ϵ)$. Equivalently, $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi$ and ${\nabla }^2\phi =-{\rho }_f/({ϵ}_0ϵ)$. The electric displacement field has units $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ and the electric field has units $\mathrm{V}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$.

The local equations determine the fields once their geometry and boundary conditions are specified; a density value alone does not determine a unique vector field without that information.

An electrical insulator has no freely conducting bulk charge in the ideal static description, but an applied electric field can displace bound positive and negative charge relative to one another. The resulting electric dipole moments per unit volume define the polarization density $\mathbf{P}$. Distortion of electronic charge clouds, relative displacement of ions, and partial alignment of permanent molecular electric dipoles can all contribute. Thermal agitation opposes the last mechanism.

For a weak field in a linear isotropic dielectric, the constitutive law isHere ${\chi }_e$ is the electric susceptibility, $ϵ$ is the permittivity, and $\mathbf{D}$ is the electric displacement field. In an anisotropic material, ${\chi }_e$ is a tensor and $\mathbf{P}$ need not be parallel to $\mathbf{E}$. These response laws describe the macroscopic field, not necessarily the microscopic field acting on one molecule.

Spatial variation and surface termination of the polarization density give bound charge and bound current through the bound charge densitieswhere $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ is outward from the material. Thus uniform polarization density has no bulk bound charge, but generally has opposite bound charges on opposing surfaces. Gauss's law can be rewritten asWith no free surface charge, the normal component of $\mathbf{D}$ is continuous across an interface; the tangential electric field is continuous in electrostatics.

For example, fill a parallel-plate capacitor of plate area $A$ and gap $d$ with a uniform dielectric, neglecting fringing. At fixed free plate charge $Q$, $D=Q/A$, soThe induced bound surface charges oppose the original field, reducing the electric field and potential difference at fixed $Q$. At fixed applied potential difference, the field remains $V/d$ and the battery instead supplies more free charge. The electric displacement field separates these free-charge and bound-charge roles.

The electric displacement field is $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{P}$. A homogeneous linear isotropic dielectric has $\mathbf{P}={ϵ}_0{\chi }_e\mathbf{E}$, so $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0{ϵ}_r\mathbf{E}$. At a free-charge-free interface the normal component of D is continuous, while electrostatics requires continuity of tangential E.

At half immersion the conductor centre lies in the flat air-liquid interface. Set $\varphi =C/r$ in both media, with potential zero at infinity. The sphere is an equipotential, and the potential is continuous across the liquid plane. On that plane the radial E field is tangential, so tangential E agrees while both normal D components vanish. Each half-space also satisfies the source-free potential equation. The fields outside the sphere areGauss's law for D on a sphere gives $Q=2\pi {ϵ}_0(1+{ϵ}_r)C$. ThereforeThe half-immersed conducting sphere in a dielectric has radial E lines with equal field strength at equal radius on either side, whereas the D flux density is ${ϵ}_r$ times larger in the liquid. The corresponding free surface charge is larger on the lower hemisphere. The unchanged field direction at this particular interface follows from its tangential geometry, not from a claim that electric fields never refract at dielectric interfaces.

The outward electrostatic pressure is $p_e=\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{D}/2$. Integrating its vertical component over the two hemispheres uses ${\int }_{\mathrm{upper}}\cos \theta dA=\pi a^2$ and the negative of that integral below. ThusThe force is downward for ${ϵ}_r>1$. Initially, buoyancy on the uncharged sphere gives ${\rho }_{\ell }gf(4\pi a^3/3)=Mg$. At half immersion the upward buoyancy is therefore $Mg/(2f)$, leaving a required downward electric force $Mg(1/(2f)-1)$. Equating the two givesThis uses the ideal flat-interface, linear-dielectric model with surface tension and interface deformation neglected. If ${ϵ}_r=1$, there is no electric force of this kind, consistently preventing this mechanism from pulling an initially less-than-half-immersed sphere down to the specified level.

Permittivity describes how an electric field and a material's electric polarization combine into the electric displacement field. In a static, local response with linearity and isotropy, and no electric polarization at zero electric field, the constitutive equation isHere ${ϵ}_0$ is vacuum permittivity, while ${ϵ}_r$ is the relative permittivity, a dimensionless quantity. The SI unit of permittivity is farad per metre, $F/m$: multiplying it by an electric field in $V/m$ gives an electric displacement field in $C/{\mathrm{m}}^2$. A larger positive permittivity lets the same parallel-plate capacitor hold more plate electric charge at the same electric potential difference.

The material contribution is electric polarization $\mathbf{P}$, the electric dipole moment per unit volume. The electric displacement field and electric susceptibility ${\chi }_e$ satisfySubstitution gives the first constitutive equation. The electric field here is the averaged, total field inside the material, not just the field of the external plate electric charges. The continuum approximation averages over many chemical atoms or molecules; locality means that the electric polarization at a position depends on the electric field there. Static equilibrium, fixed material conditions and sufficiently small electric fields are needed for this scalar proportionality. ^[ref].

For an ideal parallel-plate capacitor completely filled by a uniform dielectric, hold the free plate electric charge magnitude $Q$ fixed and neglect the fringing field of a capacitor. Writing $A$ for the plate area, Gauss's law gives $D=Q/A$. ThusThe electric dipoles point along the electric field. Their surface electric charges, described by polarization density, oppose the field from the free plate electric charges. For a hypothetical dielectric with ${ϵ}_r=4$, the internal electric field is one quarter of its vacuum value, while $P=3D/4$. At fixed electric potential difference instead, the internal electric field stays approximately $V/d$ and the plate electric charge grows fourfold. These are different experimental constraints. ^[ref].

Permittivity is a useful material summary, not a universal constant of the material under every condition. Temperature, frequency and electric field strength can change the response. In a linear anisotropic dielectric, permittivity is a tensor, $D_i={\sum }_j{ϵ}_{ij}{E}_j$, so the electric displacement field need not be parallel to the electric field. At nonzero frequency, delayed electric polarization requires complex permittivity and may produce dielectric loss. ^[ref].

The permittivity tensor is the linear material-response matrix relating electric displacement field to electric field at a specified frequency. An isotropic local medium has ${ϵ}_{ij}=ϵ{\delta }_{ij}$. A magnetically biased transparent medium can have an imaginary antisymmetric transverse contribution; its eigenmodes can have opposite circular polarizations and different refractive indices.

For a coaxial cable with inner and outer radii $a,b$, a radial interface $c$, and permittivities $ϵ,{ϵ}^{\prime }$, define $T=\ln (c/a)/ϵ+\ln (b/c)/{ϵ}^{\prime }$. With terminal electric potential difference $V$, the electric displacement field is $D_{\rho }=V/(T\rho )$. The electric field is $E_{\rho }=V/(T{ϵ}_i\rho )$ in each layer $i$. If the outward and return electric currents have magnitudes $I$, the magnetic field strength in the gap is $H_{\phi }=I/(2\pi \rho )$ and the magnetic field is $B_{\phi }={\mu }_{i}I/(2\pi \rho )$.

The proof uses Gauss's law without free interface electric charge, the electric potential difference integral, and the magnetostatic Ampère law. The axial Poynting vector is $VI/(2\pi T{ϵ}_i{\rho }^2)$, so its cross-sectional surface integral is $VI$, independently of the radial material layering and magnetic permeabilities. The empty inner and exterior regions have zero electric field and magnetic field for the regular solution with bounded exterior electric potential and no applied magnetic field.

For an infinitely long circular dielectric cylinder in a uniform transverse field in vacuum, the inside electrostatic potential is linear in the transverse coordinate. Matching the tangential electric field and normal electric displacement field to the outside dipolar solution gives the displayed uniform internal field. The result assumes no free interface charge and neglects end effects; an exterior dielectric changes the permittivity ratio.

Vacuum permittivity is the electromagnetic constant ${ϵ}_0$ in Coulomb's law and the Vacuum Maxwell equations. In classical vacuum, $\mathbf{P}=0$ and the electric displacement field is $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}$. A material's permittivity includes its electric polarization response; vacuum permittivity supplies the common reference, not a separate adjustable material property. Its SI unit is farad per metre.

For elementary calculations, vacuum permittivity is approximately $8.854\times 10^{-12}F/m$. This is a deliberately rounded value, not an exact decimal or a statement of current measurement precision.^[ref] It sets the scale in Coulomb's law, $F=|q_1{q}_2|/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^2)$ for two stationary point electric charges with separation length $r$ in vacuum, and therefore enters the reference capacitance $C_0={ϵ}_{0}A/d$ of a parallel-plate capacitor.

Since the revised SI took effect on 20 May 2019, the numerical value of vacuum permittivity in SI units is determined experimentally, rather than fixed exactly by the unit definitions. The numerical values of the elementary charge $e$, Planck constant $h$ and speed of light $c$ are fixed exactly. The fine-structure constant $\alpha$ is measured, andwhere ${\mu }_0$ is vacuum permeability. Consequently vacuum permittivity and vacuum permeability have experimental uncertainty, while their product is exact in SI units because $c$ is exact. This is a change in metrological status, not a new material dependence of vacuum permittivity.^[ref]