Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 14 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The Riemannian volume form of an oriented -dimensional Riemannian manifold is the unique positive -form taking value one on every positively oriented orthonormal frame. In positive coordinates,The metric induces an inner product on exterior powers of the cotangent bundle, with wedges of distinct orthonormal covectors forming an orthonormal basis. The Hodge star is the pointwise linear map specified byIt is an isometry and satisfies . With the positive-sign convention, the Hodge Laplacian on differential forms isHere is the exterior derivative and its formal adjoint; on functions is zero. On functions this is the Laplace-Beltrami operatorThe convention gives the negative of this operator. All subsequent Laplacians use the nonnegative convention above.
On a compact oriented manifold without boundary, the Hodge decomposition theorem gives an orthogonal decomposition of smooth real forms,The three component forms are uniquely determined, although the potentials in the last two summands need not be unique. The space is finite-dimensional, and each de Rham cohomology class has a unique harmonic representative. Integration by parts gives , so harmonic forms are exactly the closed and coclosed forms. Set outside . Compactness without boundary is a hypothesis of this version of the theorem; orientation alone does not supply it.
A connection on induces a dual connection on and then connections on its tensor and exterior powers by the Leibniz rule. Explicitly, for a -form ,To prove the parallelism of the Riemannian volume form, use a local positively oriented orthonormal frame , its dual coframe , and write . Metric compatibility makes the matrix skew-symmetric. Since , differentiating the wedge yieldsOff-diagonal terms vanish because they repeat a coframe factor. Thus ; equivalently parallel transport preserves both the metric and the continuously chosen orientation.
Now let be compact, oriented and without boundary. For representing functionals on harmonic forms by wedge pairing, choose an -orthonormal basis of and defineIf , linearity givesThis also works when , using the empty sum. Since the Hodge star commutes with the Hodge Laplacian, is harmonic of degree .
For the full ambiguity of harmonic wedge-pairing representatives, write another representative as . Because the star is an isometry,The forms range over all of . Hence gives zero functional exactly when its harmonic projection is zero. Hodge decomposition proves that the complete answer isBoth summands in this ambiguity are permitted; it is not only an exact-form ambiguity. The exact and coexact component forms are orthogonal to every harmonic form, so every displayed choice works. Conversely a nonzero harmonic component would pair nontrivially with some , and therefore cannot occur. The harmonic representative is unique; the arbitrary smooth representative generally is not. The formula also covers the endpoint degrees and any exceptional case where the ambiguity space is zero.
For a concrete coexact ambiguity, take the torus with metric . The form annihilates every harmonic one-form by orthogonality, yet is nonzero. Thus an annihilating representative need not even be closed, let alone exact.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 15 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the given orientation throughout, and the usual convention that the manifold has no boundary. In an oriented manifold chart the metric volume form isIf is another oriented chart and , then , so because . This is exactly the transformation of the top exterior product. The formulas therefore agree on overlaps and define a smooth positive volume form. Equivalently it takes value one on any positively oriented orthonormal tangent frame.
The metric induces an inner product on -forms by making the increasing exterior products of an orthonormal coframe orthonormal. The Hodge star operator is the unique pointwise linear map satisfyingFor an increasing multi-index , is the complementary wedge with the sign making . Swapping the blocks of and factors introduces . ThereforeIn particular and .
For compactly supported smooth , the -form has compact support. Stokes theorem and the graded Leibniz rule giveA top form equals . Consequently this Hodge integration by parts for one-forms becomes exactlyCompact support of is enough; need not itself have compact support.
Define the codifferential on -forms by and the Hodge Laplacian by . A harmonic differential form is a smooth form in . On functions this is the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator, . This sign convention is required by the product identity; it is the negative of the convention also commonly used for the Laplace-Beltrami operator.
For a -form , the square of the Hodge star operator and the codifferential formula giveApplying the second formula to and the first to givesThus Hodge star commutes with the Hodge Laplacian. Since is invertible, is harmonic if and only if is harmonic. This holds without compactness; we have not used the generally false noncompact implication that a harmonic form must be closed and coclosed.
For a smooth function and one-form , the same graded Leibniz rule gives . Apply this to to obtain the product rule for the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator
The Hodge decomposition theorem states that on a compact oriented boundaryless Riemannian manifold, smooth forms have the -orthogonal decompositionand each de Rham cohomology class has a unique harmonic differential form representative. To spell out the last conclusion, a harmonic form is closed and coclosed because . If a closed form decomposes as , then ; integration by parts gives . Thus it represents . A harmonic exact form has zero norm by adjointness, proving uniqueness. The analytic existence of the decomposition is the stated Hodge decomposition theorem.
Now let be compact, connected and oriented. A harmonic function satisfies , so it is constant. The Hodge star operator identifies with , hence . A Riemannian metric exists by Question 3 even if none was initially chosen. Using the harmonic representative of each class, we obtain the top de Rham cohomology of a compact connected oriented manifoldThe class is nonzero also directly from Stokes theorem, since while every exact top form has zero integral. Boundarylessness matters: a compact interval has zero first de Rham cohomology.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 117 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the nonnegative sign convention for the Laplace-Beltrami operator; the ambient Laplacian has the same sign convention. Changing both signs changes the signs of the eigenvalues below. Let be an orthonormal basis of , and let be the unit-speed geodesic with and . The geodesic Hessian formula givesIndeed, the second derivative along a geodesic is , because its covariant acceleration is zero. Taking the trace of the Hessian matrix in this orthonormal basis gives the displayed Laplace-Beltrami operator.
For the sphere, put , where , and write for a smooth ambient function. The Euclidean metric becomes and its volume form is . The coordinate formula for the Laplace-Beltrami operator therefore gives the polar-coordinate Laplacian identityFor , restriction to yieldsThis relation also has a direct geodesic proof. At a point , complete an orthonormal basis of the tangent space by the radial vector . Each great-circle geodesic satisfies . The chain rule gives . Summing and comparing with the ambient trace gives precisely the radial correction above.
Let be the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree on , and let be its subspace of harmonic polynomials. For , homogeneity gives . Substituting in the polar-coordinate Laplacian identity proves that its restriction is a spherical harmonic withRestriction is injective on : if , homogeneity makes zero away from the origin, hence everywhere.
To count and exhaust these eigenfunctions, use the harmonic decomposition of homogeneous polynomialsHere is an algebraic proof rather than an assumption about the spectrum. On polynomials put the Fischer inner product . Multiplication by is adjoint to , so multiplication by is adjoint to . In finite-dimensional inner-product spaces, the orthogonal complement of the image of multiplication by is . This proves the decomposition. Multiplication by is injective, sowhere the second term is zero for .
Iterating the harmonic decomposition of homogeneous polynomials and restricting to expresses every polynomial restriction as a finite sum of spherical harmonics. Polynomial restrictions contain constants and separate points of the sphere, so the Stone-Weierstrass theorem makes them uniformly dense in the continuous functions, and hence dense in . The Laplace-Beltrami operator is self-adjoint, and eigenfunctions with different eigenvalues are orthogonal. If a smooth eigenfunction had an eigenvalue not in the list, it would be orthogonal to a dense subspace and would vanish. If it had a listed eigenvalue, subtracting its orthogonal projection onto the corresponding finite-dimensional gives the same contradiction. Thus, for , the spectrum of the Laplacian on a sphere isIn particular, the zero eigenvalue has multiplicity one; on each positive eigenvalue has multiplicity two; on the multiplicity is .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 117 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A flat torus is the quotient , where is a full-rank Euclidean lattice, with the Riemannian metric induced from the Euclidean metric. Translation by a lattice vector is a Riemannian isometry, so this metric is well defined and has zero curvature. Its volume is the covolume of .
The dual lattice is . For , the function descends to the flat torus, and direct differentiation givesConversely, write and . Ordinary Fourier series on have frequencies , corresponding to . After normalization they form a complete orthonormal basis in , and the Fourier coefficients of a smooth function decay rapidly. Applying the Laplace-Beltrami operator term by term shows that a smooth eigenfunction with eigenvalue has nonzero coefficients only where . Thus the spectrum of a flat torus isThe formula counts multiplicity over either the real or complex numbers: the two frequencies give the real sine and cosine functions.
For the rigidity assertion in dimension two, it suffices to reconstruct a rank-two Euclidean lattice from its vector-length multiset. The multiset first determines its covolume . Indeed, a bounded fundamental parallelogram, and comparison of the cells meeting a disk with slightly larger and smaller disks, give the lattice-point asymptotics by fundamental cellsThe spectrum determines , including multiplicities, so it determines .
Let be the smallest nonzero vector length, and choose with . This vector is primitive: with would contradict minimality. From the length multiset subtract the two vectors at every positive length , for . The shortest remaining length is exactly the length of a shortest vector . This subtraction is legitimate even if several directions have length : it subtracts just two copies, and then . It also proves that is independent of our choice of shortest direction. Replace by to arrangeThe replacement stays outside and cannot be shorter than , so a reduced choice still has length .
The shortest-independent-vector basis lemma says that are a basis of . To prove it, choose coordinates with . Because is primitive, ; let be the smallest positive vertical coordinate in . Write , with after changing its sign. If , a vector of vertical coordinate , reduced horizontally modulo , hasThis contradicts the definition of , since . Hence and generate .
The Gram matrix of this basis is , with , and its determinant is . ThereforeChanging the sign of one basis vector allows . The numbers , all audible from the spectrum, consequently determine the Gram matrix, and hence , up to an orthogonal transformation. Taking dual lattices gives the same conclusion for . Isospectral flat two-dimensional tori are isometric. The argument uses the special basis property of rank-two Euclidean lattices, so it does not claim higher-dimensional rigidity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 117 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let be the orientation-preserving hyperbolic triangle group, acting on the hyperbolic plane with presentationIts quotient is a topological sphere with three cone points of order seven. Define the surjective group homomorphismThe stated order conditions make this well defined, and the generation hypothesis makes it surjective. Set . Every finite-order element of a hyperbolic triangle group is conjugate to a power of a cone-point generator. None of its nontrivial such powers lies in , since all three images have order seven. Therefore is torsion free, and is a closed oriented hyperbolic surface carrying an isometric action of .
The orbifold Euler characteristic of the base isThe covering degree is , so and has genus . The subgroups have order . Point stabilizers for the action are trivial or cyclic of order seven. Since seven does not divide , each acts freely. Thusare smooth closed hyperbolic surfaces, andEquivalently, each is a seven-sheeted orbifold cover of the base with three branch values, and the Riemann-Hurwitz formula gives the same genus.
Gassmann equivalence means that meet each conjugacy class of in the same number of elements. To prove isospectrality directly, let be a Laplacian eigenfunction space on , viewed as a representation of . Pullback identifies with its -invariant subspace. Averaging over is the projection onto this subspace, and henceThe character of a representation in this sum is constant on conjugacy classes. The sums are equal by Gassmann equivalence, so the eigenvalues and their multiplicities agree. This is the mechanism of the Sunada theorem. The constructed genus-three hyperbolic surfaces are isospectral.
Nonconjugacy of in does not prove nonisometry. For example, an isometry of outside the given subgroup might conjugate to and descend to an isometry of the quotients. More generally, an isometry between the quotients lifts to an isometry of conjugating the two groups ; there is no requirement that this lift come from an element of . Additional symmetries of the three-cone-point construction are a possible source of this coincidence.
One can prevent this by modifying the common metric, while keeping the action isometric. Here is a geometric way to make that step precise. On the regular part of the base orbifold , choose a sufficiently small smooth conformal rescaling of a Riemannian metric of its metric whose local geometry distinguishes base points and local directions. One may use a generic smooth conformal factor with separate curvature features on a countable collection of small disks. Let these disks approach the cone points, with amplitudes decaying sufficiently rapidly that the lifted conformal factor and all its derivatives vanish at their centres. This gives smooth metrics on the covering surface, without retaining an open homogeneous region near a cone point. The purpose is to ensure that a local isometry in the regular part covering a quotient is the identity on the base: the curvature features identify its base point and local frame. Pull the metric back to and then descend it to both . The only points with the cone-point rotational symmetry in their metric germs are the lifts of the cone points; the perturbation removes such symmetries in the regular part. Any quotient isometry must therefore preserve this finite distinguished set.
If the perturbed quotients were isometric, their local maps on the dense regular part would preserve the projection to . They would therefore give equivalent connected covers of the punctured base; the correspondence between connected covering spaces and subgroups would conjugate to inside . Applying would conjugate inside , contrary to hypothesis. Thus the perturbed quotients are nonisometric. The same averaging argument still proves isospectrality, because it requires a common -invariant Riemannian metric, not constant curvature. The genus remains three.
This last step produces nonisometric isospectral metrics of variable curvature on genus-three surfaces. An oriented metric defines a Riemann surface through its conformal structure; using a conformal perturbation even preserves the original conformal structures. If “Riemann surface” means specifically its canonical curvature metric, the last step should instead be described as producing Riemannian surfaces. The orbifold has no hyperbolic deformation parameters: uniformizing the perturbed metrics does not preserve their Laplace-Beltrami operator spectra, and cannot be used to claim nonisometric hyperbolic examples from this argument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 117 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Equip the closed Riemann surface with its uniformizing hyperbolic metric. This assumption matters: arbitrary metrics can have an annular region filled by parallel simple closed geodesics. On a hyperbolic surface, a nontrivial free homotopy class has exactly one closed geodesic, and a contractible closed geodesic cannot exist. Consequently distinct disjoint simple closed geodesics are essential and nonparallel.
Cut along such geodesics. Every component has negative Euler characteristic, since disk and annulus components are excluded. If a component has genus and boundary components, its complexity is . This is nonnegative for the possible components, with equality precisely for a pair of pants. Summing over the cut components givesFor completeness, if there are components, Euler additivity gives , while , which proves the identity. Hence . If any component has positive complexity, it contains an essential nonperipheral simple closed curve. Its unique geodesic representative stays in that component and is disjoint from the existing boundary geodesics, contradicting maximality. A maximal collection therefore cuts the surface into pairs of pants and hasThe second count follows because each pair of pants has Euler characteristic . Conversely, any topological pants decomposition can be straightened to its disjoint geodesic representatives, so this maximum is attained.
The pants decomposition graph has one vertex for each pair of pants and one edge for each glued cuff. Two cuffs on the same pant give a loop; multiple edges are allowed. It is connected and trivalent, with , and first Betti number . For genus three one possibility is the complete graph . Another has vertices , double edges and , and single edges and . These are nonisomorphic graphs: the second has multiple edges while has none.
There is an explicit diffeomorphism between the represented surfaces. In the decomposition, unite the pants labelled across their shared cuff. This union is a four-holed sphere, whose exterior cuffs lead twice to and twice to . Replace the interior cuff by a simple curve separating the two cuffs from the two cuffs. The new pants then have double adjacencies to respectively, while their shared cuff gives and the untouched original cuff gives . This is an elementary move of a pants decomposition. We have simply recut the same oriented surface, so the identity on that surface is the desired diffeomorphism between its two descriptions. The graphs do not make this evident because they record a chosen pants decomposition, which the diffeomorphism need not preserve; they also omit all lengths and twists.
A hyperbolic pair of pants is uniquely determined up to isometry by its three positive boundary lengths. Cutting along the three perpendicular seams yields two congruent right-angled hexagons, with alternating sides half the cuff lengths; hyperbolic hexagon identities determine the remaining sides. To recover the surface, choose each of the cuff lengths , and for each gluing choose the signed displacement between the seam feet. For a fixed marking and decomposition these are the Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates:Unmarked gluing displacement at one cuff is periodic modulo ; the real lift of remembers the marking, and a full Dehn twist changes it by . To classify unmarked surfaces globally, take the quotient by the mapping class group, allowing changes of pants decomposition as well; if orientation is forgotten, use the extended mapping class group. Lengths alone do not determine the surface: the twists change the geometry of crossing geodesics.
Fix an oriented reference surface . Its Teichmüller space consists of pairs , where is a Riemann surface and is an orientation-preserving marking. Two pairs are equivalent when an orientation-preserving biholomorphism makes isotopic to the other marking. For , the uniformization theorem identifies these with marked hyperbolic metrics. The space is a complex manifold of complex dimension , and Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates identify its underlying real manifold with . For the analytic argument below, the essential property is that these are real-analytic coordinates and the length of every fixed closed curve class is a real-analytic function on Teichmüller space. The length and twist coordinates are not themselves holomorphic coordinates.
The Wolpert generic spectral rigidity theorem says that, for each , there is a closed proper real-analytic subset , of positive codimension, such that if and has the same Laplace-Beltrami operator spectrum as , then are isometric. Equivalently, a generic compact hyperbolic surface is determined by its unmarked length spectrum, with multiplicities. “Isometric” allows reversal of orientation: an unoriented spectrum cannot distinguish a surface from its complex conjugate.
Two major proof steps explain both parts of this conclusion. First is the analytic reduction to finitely many possible spectral matchings locally. The Selberg trace formula identifies the Laplacian spectrum with the unmarked length spectrum. A finite collection of marked length functions determines the length and twist parameters: include pants cuffs and enough transverse curves to determine each twist and its sign. For each assignment of those curves to lengths in a putative partner, the equalities of length functions are real-analytic equations. Uniform length cutoffs on a neighbourhood, bounded geometry of isospectral partners and the discreteness of the length spectrum give local finiteness of the possibilities; finite-length determination of the full spectrum allows the remaining conditions to be reduced to finitely many analytic equations. Thus this is a locally finite analytic problem, not an uncontrolled union of zero sets indexed by infinitely many arbitrary permutations. The role of this step is to put exceptional isospectral coincidences into real-analytic loci and ultimately to give a closed analytic exceptional set.
Second is the geometric recognition of the matchings that can persist on an open set. Such a matching produces identities between length functions as the length and twist parameters vary. Pinching a pants cuff makes its hyperbolic collar wide: by the collar lemma, any crossing curve acquires length tending to infinity, whereas disjoint curves can stay bounded. Varying cuffs and twists separately, together with the hyperbolic trace and hexagon identities for neighbouring pants, identifies which persistent matches preserve simple curves, disjointness and the gluing data. The resulting persistent transformation is induced by a mapping class, possibly with orientation reversal, and so it only gives an isometry of the underlying surfaces. Every other local matching imposes a nonidentical real-analytic equation, whose zero set has positive codimension. Removing these proper exceptional loci proves generic rigidity. The geometric step is indispensable: analyticity alone would not exclude an entire open family of distinct surfaces with the same unmarked length spectrum.
A related useful consequence is that a fixed hyperbolic surface has only finitely many isometry classes of isospectral partners. The common length spectrum fixes the systole, so the partners lie in a compact thick part of moduli space. If distinct partners converged, choose local markings and a finite determining collection of curves. Their lengths converge, but belong to the same discrete length spectrum, so eventually every one of these finitely many lengths is constant. The determining collection then forces the marked metrics to coincide, a contradiction. This compactness-and-discreteness argument proves finiteness; the additional geometric recognition step above is what strengthens it to the generic uniqueness asserted by Wolpert's theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 118 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The real coordinate functions are real and imaginary parts of the holomorphic coordinates . Part (a), together with the real coefficients of the Laplace-Beltrami operator, therefore shows that every is a harmonic function. For the given divergence-of-gradient convention, applying the operator to givesThese are the harmonic coordinate identities. Expanding the operator on an arbitrary smooth function now givesThe bracketed coefficients vanish. Hence there is no first-derivative term in these coordinates:The reason is that the real components of holomorphic coordinates are harmonic coordinates for a Kähler metric; a general real coordinate change need not retain this simplification.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 126 5 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Work initially with , where the nonholomorphic Eisenstein series and its differentiated series converge locally absolutely. For , the identitiesshow that each summand at becomes the summand indexed by at . Reindexing the nonzero integer pairs therefore provesHere and the denominator powers use logarithms of positive real numbers, so there is no ambiguity for complex .
For the nonnegative Laplace-Beltrami operator of the hyperbolic plane, . If with primitive and , choose a matrix in with bottom row . The corresponding summand isThe Laplace-Beltrami operator commutes with hyperbolic isometries, so this summand has eigenvalue . This also covers , or follows there directly. Termwise differentiation now givesThe equation describes an automorphic eigenfunction; it does not assert that this noncuspidal function belongs to the square-integrable discrete spectrum.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 131 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
At each point, use the inverse metric on the cotangent space. It induces an inner product on -forms byEquivalently, wedges of distinct members of an orthonormal coframe form an orthonormal basis. Choose an orientation to define the ordinary global Hodge star operator by . It maps -forms to -forms and obeys . We use real forms; complex forms are obtained by complex-linear extension. Without an orientation an ordinary global star is not available without twisting the target, so orientation is implicit in this first part.
With the codifferential for and , define the Hodge Laplacian . On functions it is the nonnegative-sign Laplace-Beltrami operator, . A harmonic differential form satisfies .
For of degree , the displayed sign formula and star square giveApplying the identities again, at degrees and , proves the Hodge star commutes with the Hodge Laplacian relationSince star is invertible, is harmonic if and only if is harmonic. This part does not need compactness; zero-degree and top-degree terms are interpreted as zero when their degrees are outside the range.
For the remaining cohomological statements assume a compact oriented manifold without boundary. The Hodge decomposition theorem gives the -orthogonal decompositionwhere is finite-dimensional and consists of smooth forms. Formal adjointness gives , so harmonic differential forms are closed differential forms and coclosed differential forms.
If , formal adjointness and give . A continuous nonnegative function with zero integral vanishes, so . Then . Thus the a function with nonnegative Laplacian on a closed manifold is locally constant assertion isIt is globally constant when is connected. The PDF does not explicitly include connectedness here; on two disjoint circles one may take different constants, so literal global constancy needs that qualification. Boundaryless is the standard manifold convention in this argument; otherwise boundary conditions are necessary.
For a closed differential form , write its Hodge decomposition as . Since , we have . Formal adjointness yields , so . Thus represents its de Rham cohomology class. If two harmonic representatives differ by , their difference has . Therefore
Finally let . A connected Lie group admits a smooth path from the identity to . The maps give a smooth homotopy between the identity and . The homotopy invariance of de Rham cohomology says their pullbacks agree on cohomology. The maps preserve orientation, since their Jacobian signs cannot change from the identity along the path. As an orientation-preserving isometry, commutes on forms with star, exterior differentiation, codifferentiation and consequently the Hodge Laplacian. Hence is harmonic and represents the same cohomology class as a harmonic . Uniqueness now proves the harmonic forms are fixed by a connected isometric group action conclusionThe argument also applies componentwise when is disconnected.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 306 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The conformal condition is a quantum worldsheet Weyl anomaly cancellation, not the classical metric equation of the Polyakov action. Assume a smooth target metric, no antisymmetric background field, and curvature/gradient scales large compared with . Use and , consistent with the Ricci-scalar Weyl transformation in the hint.
A sign convention in the printed action must be made explicit. With worldsheet signature , continuation and sends its negative kinetic term to a positive Euclidean kinetic term, while its positive Lorentzian curvature coupling becomes a negative Euclidean curvature coupling. Define the conventional Euclidean dilaton by for this literal action. Then . The Lorentzian dilaton coupling sign convention is therefore important: a convention with a negative Lorentzian curvature coupling would instead use and reverse every term linear in the printed below.
For completeness, the metric part of the one-loop calculation can be obtained by a geodesic background field expansion of a string sigma model. Write . Its quadratic Euclidean action containsHere . In dimension , the ultraviolet coincident contraction has pole with an infrared regulator. Contracting the curvature term gives a divergence . It is cancelled by the metric counterterm , giving the one-loop sigma-model beta function before the dilaton improvement. Equivalently its local Euclidean Weyl variation is , with terms proportional to the embedding equations understood as field redefinitions.
Set in the supplied curvature transformation. On a closed string worldsheet, integration by parts givesThe chain rule and leading string embedding map equation implyThe kinetic embedding equation suffices for extracting the leading metric coefficient. More precisely, the full Euclidean embedding equation makes the parenthesis , giving a curvature contribution to the Weyl variation. This contributes to the scalar coefficient below rather than to the leading metric tensor coefficient. Combining the curvature counterterm anomaly with this variation gives the leading metric-dilaton Weyl condition:This is the gravitational equation in the string frame, rather than an ordinary Einstein equation with a minimally coupled scalar. In terms of the field and signs literally printed in this Lorentzian action it readsThe frequently used is obtained if the printed is identified with the conventional Euclidean dilaton, which requires the opposite Lorentzian curvature-coupling sign. Both conventions describe the same mathematics after , but one cannot change only the field equation silently. Also, vanishing of this tensor coefficient is the metric part of Weyl invariance; the dilaton curvature coefficient and central-charge condition remain to be checked.
Now derive the scalar consequence without presupposing its integration constant. The contracted Bianchi identity gives . The Ricci identity applied to the gradient of a scalar givesDiverging the metric equation and then substituting yieldsThus the bracket is constant on each connected target component. Its trace equation is , so the dilaton equation from contracted Bianchi identity becomesThe second equation uses the literal printed sign convention. These are nonlinear scalar wave equations analogous to the Klein-Gordon equation. For the exponentiated dilaton wave equation, put ; differentiating twice givesHere is the Lorentzian Laplace-Beltrami operator, and is a Lorentzian contraction, not necessarily nonnegative.
The Bianchi and Ricci identities alone do not imply . The linear dilaton counterexample to zero integration constant is flat target space with : the tensor equation holds for every constant , while . A non-null disproves any deduction of the zero-constant scalar equation from that tensor equation alone.
The leading dilaton Weyl anomaly coefficient is obtained as follows. The matter and reparameterization-ghost central charges give the constant . Expanding the curvature coupling along the same geodesic fluctuation gives the quadratic term ; its coincident contraction is cancelled by , giving the term . The full embedding-equation contribution identified above supplies . Therefore full leading-order bosonic-string Weyl invariance also requiresIt fixes . Hence in the critical theory, or under boundary conditions making the constant vanish,This explains precisely the extra input needed for a zero-mass Klein-Gordon-type equation. In noncritical dimension the corresponding equation has the central-charge-deficit constant, subject to the usual controlled-background assumptions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 308 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
A collective coordinate describes a position, orientation, or another parameter of a family of static solitons. For a family , promote to a slowly varying and substitute into the field action. In a scalar theory with unit kinetic coefficient, this gives the collective-coordinate effective LagrangianFor a gauge-theory soliton, one also solves the Gauss law constraint in gauge theory constraint and projects out pure gauge transformations; arbitrary variations of gauge representatives do not define the physical metric. Tangent vectors to an exactly equal-energy family are zero modes in field theory. If is constant, the Euler-Lagrange equations of this moduli-space approximation arethe geodesic equations of its Riemannian metric. The approximation neglects radiation and deformation modes; it describes motion sufficiently slow that these omitted degrees of freedom remain unexcited to the required accuracy.
In collective-coordinate quantization, take the wavefunction measure and the minimal scalar Hamiltonian operatorThe Laplace-Beltrami operator supplies coordinate-invariant kinetic energy. Global identifications and statistics must be imposed on the wavefunctions; the classical metric alone does not choose them. Curvature-ordering terms and loop corrections are additional quantum input.
For the phi-four kink, use the normalization and profile of Question 1. Substituting givesThe metric is constant because of translation invariance. This proves the translational dynamics of a phi-four kink: classically the centre moves at constant velocity, and quantum mechanicallyPlane waves label the continuous translational momentum, with no position-dependent potential. Uniform-motion Lorentz invariance upgrades the dispersion to ; the displayed collective Lagrangian is its small-velocity expansion. Small perturbations also include an internal shape mode and continuum radiation, which this single collective coordinate omits. The fluctuation operator of a phi-four kink in this normalization isthe translational eigenfunction has , the shape mode has , and continuum modes in the spectrum start at . Thus the free-coordinate states describe the kink's low translational energies, not its full excitation spectrum or quantum mass correction.
For two Abelian Higgs vortices at critical coupling, the static energy is and the Abelian Higgs vortex moduli space has four real dimensions. Let be their positions, , and . The centre of mass decouples; the relative metric is rotationally symmetric and can be writtenAt large separation, , recovering two free particles. Although there is no static separation potential, the nonconstant metric produces velocity-dependent interaction. Coincidence is smooth in the relative coordinate for two identical vortices , not in the double-valued . Smoothness gives for near zero. A head-on geodesic continues through to the opposite real ray, so changes its line by : the vortices scatter through a right angle. This geometric argument does not require an explicit formula for .
With ordinary bosonic exchange statistics, relative wavefunctions are single-valued in and smooth at coincidence. In the separated polar coordinate they obey , with even integer angular labels. Their kinetic operator isThe apparent singularity at must be resolved with the smooth coordinate and regularity, rather than arbitrary boundary conditions on a punctured cone. The free centre-of-mass motion and the asymptotically free relative geometry give quantum scattering states; a flat static energy does not imply that the metric is flat or that scattering is absent. This is not a prediction of a discrete family of static two-vortex bound separations. The smooth collision geometry is developed in David Tong's arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0509216.
For a Skyrmion of baryon number one, the Skyrmion hedgehog ansatz iswhere are the Pauli matrices. Include a centre and an orientation through . Hedgehog symmetry identifies spatial rotations with opposite internal rotations, so there are three independent orientation coordinates, not six. Since and give the same field, the physical orientation space is , with SU(2) group as its double cover. Write . The leading collective Lagrangian has the formwhere is the rotational moment of inertia obtained by integrating the profile's field kinetic energy.
For the fermionic quantization appropriate to baryons, the Finkelstein-Rubinstein constraints on the double cover impose . In SU(2) representations, the central element acts by , so must be half-integer. Left and right group actions supply isospin and spin angular momentum; hedgehog symmetry makes their magnitudes equal. The rotational quantization of a unit Skyrmion therefore givesThe level has four spin-isospin states and models the nucleon doublet, proton and neutron, each with two spin states. The level has sixteen states and models the Delta baryon quartet, each with four spin states. The rotor predicts a splitting . Without the fermionic sign, single-valued functions on would instead allow integer , which is a different quantization. High rotor levels can couple to deformation and pion radiation; this semiclassical approximation does not establish that its entire formal tower consists of stable particles.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 115 4 Solution 2026-10-03
The Levi-Civita connection of a Riemannian manifold is the unique connection on a vector bundle on that is torsion-free and compatible with the Riemannian metric. Any such connection must satisfy the Koszul formulaNondegeneracy of determines uniquely from the right-hand side. Conversely, define by this formula. Direct substitution shows that it is -linear in , satisfies the Leibniz rule in , preserves , and obeys . It is therefore a torsion-free metric connection. This proves the Existence and uniqueness of the Levi-Civita connection.
For the metric vector bundle , choose the stated orthonormal local frame and write . Since , metric compatibility givesHence the connection matrix in an orthonormal frame is skew-symmetric:
On an oriented Riemannian -manifold, the Hodge star operator is defined byIt is an orthogonal map and satisfies . In dimension on middle-degree forms, the Adjoint of the Hodge star on middle-degree forms isThus it is self-adjoint when is even, but it is not always self-adjoint. For on the oriented Euclidean plane,so its matrix in the orthonormal basis is skew-adjoint.
The Laplace-Beltrami operator on differential forms is the Hodge Laplacianwhere the codifferential is the formal adjoint of the exterior derivative. On a compact manifold without boundary, if for a nonzero differential form , then integration by parts givesTherefore the nonnegativity of the Hodge Laplacian yields
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ii Paper 2 26F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The map is an immersion when has rank two, equivalently and are linearly independent. It is isothermal when its first fundamental form hasIn general the mean curvature isThe surface is minimal when . In isothermal coordinates the Laplace-Beltrami operator identity isThus exactly when each coordinate function is harmonic.
Forthe isothermal conditions areand harmonicity givesConsequentlyand the isothermal equation reduces toThese are all the solutions for which never vanishes. When they parameterize a catenoid, up to translations, reflection and scaling. The limiting cases , , with exactly one of nonzero, parameterize a punctured plane.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 115 2 b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The metric on covectors is induced by the inverse matrix , and on -forms by the determinant pairingThe Riemannian volume form is the unique positive top form taking value one on every oriented orthonormal frame. The Hodge star operator is uniquely determined byNondegeneracy of the wedge pairing proves existence and uniqueness pointwise, and the smooth metric dependence makes a well-defined smooth bundle map.
On compactly supported forms, Stokes theorem and the graded Leibniz rule givewhere ; this is the formal adjoint of . The Hodge Laplace-Beltrami operator is
For , the covector metric scales by , the -form metric by , and the volume form by . ThereforeIf is constant, the two star factors in the codifferential contribute , so . Since is metric-independent,
