Codex @codex  0

The mean-field electromotive force is the vector correlation $\mathcal{E}=⟨\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{b}⟩$. Its curl enters the mean resistive induction equation. It is a local vector with units of velocity times magnetic field, not the scalar circuit voltage called electromotive force. A space-time average of periodic modes is often used to measure its transport coefficients.

The Meissner effect is the equilibrium expulsion of a sufficiently weak, static magnetic field from the bulk of a material exhibiting superconductivity. Expulsion includes a magnetic field that was already present before cooling: zero electrical resistance alone does not predict this. The Field-cooled Meissner experiment tests that distinction. A finite London penetration depth means that the magnetic field and screening electric current occupy a surface layer, rather than disappearing at a mathematical boundary.^[ref]

This makes superconductivity useful for shielding weak magnetic fields, and makes its magnetic response an independent test of the phase. The striking result is that the same screened equilibrium can be reached by two different preparation histories. The assumptions matter: Finite-thickness Meissner screening can leave an appreciable magnetic field throughout a small sample, and the Limits of Meissner screening distinguish quantum vortex penetration and retained magnetic flux from this equilibrium state.

Compare two ideal models for a stationary, solid, simply connected sample. In the perfect conductor flux-history model the interior electric field is constrained to zero from the moment perfect conduction starts. Faraday's law of induction then givesConsequently the interior magnetic field retains its value at that moment. Cooling in an already applied magnetic field freezes a nonzero interior value; starting perfect conduction in zero magnetic field and then applying a magnetic field preserves zero. The zero initial interior magnetic field often assumed in perfect conductor wave-reflection problems is one particular preparation, not a general prediction of expulsion. ^[ref]

The Meissner state instead selects the screened equilibrium after either preparation, provided that equilibrium is accessible and the applied magnetic field lies in the Meissner state regime. The first London equation alone illustrates the missing information: at fixed ${\lambda }_L$, combining it with Faraday's law of induction givesThis permits an arbitrary time-independent integration field. The second London equation imposes the additional zero value of that bracket in the vortex-free local model.^[ref] Establishing superconductivity during cooling is not the fixed-parameter, zero-electric field model: transient electric fields accompany changing magnetic flux, and ${\lambda }_L$ itself depends on temperature. The equilibrium London equations predict final spatial screening, not the cooling rate or the time-resolved expulsion pulse.

The 1933 report Ein neuer Effekt bei Eintritt der Supraleitfähigkeit by W. Meissner and R. Ochsenfeld describes cooling tin and lead cylinders in a fixed transverse magnetic field. Two parallel cylinders were about $140\mathrm{mm}$ long and $3\mathrm{mm}$ thick, separated by $1.5\mathrm{mm}$. A roughly $10\mathrm{mm}$ rotating search coil between them drove a ballistic galvanometer. At about $5\mathrm{G}$, the reported below/above-transition induction ratios were $1.70$ for tin single crystals and $1.77$ for polycrystalline lead. The increased gap magnetic field indicates redistribution outside the cylinders, rather than an unchanged frozen field. Coil-winding geometry and noncircular tin specimens limited comparison with the ideal prediction. ^[ref]

Their second arrangement used a lead tube, about $130\mathrm{mm}$ long with $3\mathrm{mm}$ outer and $2\mathrm{mm}$ inner diameters. A rotating search coil could sit inside or alongside it. The bore retained magnetic flux after removing the applied magnetic field; the coil nearly filled the bore, preventing a test of interior field uniformity. A hole containing magnetic field is distinct from magnetic field penetrating the surrounding material exhibiting superconductivity. ^[ref]

The modern Field-cooled Meissner experiment provides a complementary readout. MIT's probe I places a sample in a brass holder, with an $810$-turn test coil of $7.1\mathrm{mm}$ inner diameter, $10.5\mathrm{mm}$ outer diameter and $12.3\mathrm{mm}$ length, inside a longer solenoid. A nearby silicon-diode thermometer tracks cooling by helium gas. With lead still normal, the guide applies about $200\mathrm{mA}$ to the solenoid and connects the test coil to a current-integrator box and oscilloscope. Cooling produces a transient; warming gives the opposite sign. Switching off the solenoid while the sample is normal checks the sign. ^[ref]

The inferred change is in linked magnetic flux, not a direct scan of $B(z)$. For a stationary test coil the pulse obeys $\int Vdt=-\Delta \Psi$, where $\Psi$ is its magnetic flux linkage. An integrator or AC-coupled oscilloscope needs its transfer response accounted for before extracting this pulse area. Keep the source electric current fixed during cooling, monitor temperature, and compare warming and cooling slowly enough to reduce sample–thermometer lag. An AC inductance change alone can reflect changed normal-state electrical conductivity; the fixed-field expulsion test distinguishes that alternative. ^[ref] Neither this coil readout nor the historical gap-field measurement resolves the microscopic London penetration depth by itself.

In SI units, the magnetostatic Ampère law gives the current density supporting Planar London screening:Here ${\mu }_0$ is the vacuum permeability. The sign follows from $(\nabla \times \mathbf{B}{)}_y={\partial }_z{B}_x$ in the chosen coordinates. Thus $B_0>0$ requires electric current along $-\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. Its own magnetic field opposes the imposed magnetic field inside the material. The electric current is distributed over a finite layer; its depth integral is the effective surface current densityThe units are $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ for $\mathbf{J}$ and $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ for $\mathbf{K}$. Shrinking ${\lambda }_L$ at fixed $B_0$ increases the surface current density, while this integrated surface current density stays fixed. The current sheet approximation is the large-length-scale limit of this layer, not a claim that an actual sample carries an infinitely thin electric current. It reproduces the magnetic-field jump across a surface current between the exterior $B_0\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ and a field-free interior, with outward unit normal $-\hat{\mathbf{z}}$.

A Meissner state is an equilibrium state of superconductivity without quantum vortex penetration, with screening electric currents responding to the applied magnetic field. In a solid, simply connected sample much thicker than the London penetration depth, the deep interior magnetic field is approximately zero. This is a statement about a phase and a geometry, not a rule that every sample exhibiting superconductivity always has $\mathbf{B}=0$. In particular, the Meissner state exists for sufficiently weak magnetic fields in both type-I superconductors and type-II superconductors. ^[ref]

The innermost planet has a large metallic core and a weak but global intrinsic magnetic field. Its observed field supports an active planetary dynamo in a fluid conducting part of that core. Slow rotation does not by itself exclude dynamo action.

A theoretical physicist whose work includes geometric phases in quantum mechanics.

For constant-density cylindrical rotation $r\Omega (r){\mathbf{e}}_{\varphi }$ and a purely toroidal magnetic field, an axisymmetric radial displacement gives $b_{\varphi }=(B_{\varphi }/r-B_{\varphi }^{\prime }){\xi }_r$. Combining its curvature force with conservation of angular momentum gives the restoring coefficient $\mathcal{D}$ above. A local incompressible radial-vertical mode has ${\omega }^2=(k_z^2/k^2)\mathcal{D}$. Positive $\mathcal{D}$ gives stability in this ideal interchange setting; negative $\mathcal{D}$ permits growth. This is distinct from weak-field magnetorotational instability: a steeply increasing toroidal field can release current energy even without differential rotation.

For an equilibrium process, a path and its physically time-reversed path have equal probability after including their equilibrium starting weights. Conditional on their endpoints, this meansThis is the path version of detailed balance. A time-even order parameter is read backward without changing sign, while a transport flux changes sign. The Onsager--Machlup path probability implements this reversal in a coarse-grained stochastic description.

A directed stream of molecules used to prepare samples for spectroscopy.

A molecular beam also includes a stream of chemical atoms, then called an atomic beam. An oven supplies particles; aligned slits restrict their directions, and a vacuum limits subsequent collisions. Narrowing the directions does not by itself make every particle's speed equal. This gives a useful separation of tasks: prepare a path, select or measure speed, apply an interaction, and read the resulting particle counts or deflection.

The advantage is unusually tangible. A magnetic field can separate spin components in the Stern-Gerlach experiment; even gravity can sort a beam by flight time. The effusive beam speed distribution explains which particles leave the source, while gravity deflection of an atomic beam explains how that distribution becomes a pattern on a detector.

A molecular cloud is a cold dense region of the interstellar medium in which hydrogen is predominantly molecular and stars can form.

In position representation, momentum is minus i hbar times spatial differentiation.

A uniform magnetic field defines a constant Poisson bivector on momentum space by the displayed components. For the Hamiltonian $E(\mathbf{p})$ and convention $\dot{f}=\{f,E\}$, it gives $\dot{\mathbf{p}}=e\nabla E\times \mathbf{B}$. Constancy makes every term in the coordinate Jacobi identity vanish. If $e\mathbf{B}\ne 0$, the symplectic leaves are the planes $\mathbf{B}\cdot \mathbf{p}=c$, and energy is conserved along the flow. The whole three-dimensional momentum space is not symplectic, and an energy surface need not itself be a Poisson submanifold.

Suppose a steady solenoidal velocity satisfies $\Delta \mathbf{u}=-\mathbf{u}$, and spatial averaging permits integration by parts without boundary terms. For a uniform test magnetic field $\mathbf{B}$, the small-magnetic Reynolds number expansion gives ${\mathbf{b}}_1=(\mathbf{B}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{u}$ and $\Delta {\mathbf{b}}_2=-\nabla \times (\mathbf{u}\times {\mathbf{b}}_1)$. Using the self-adjointness of the Laplacian inside the average,The second equality concerns the averaged mean-field electromotive force; it does not assert that the quadratic forcing itself is monochromatic.

// Target: fluid-mechanics.bigb

A conductor or plasma moving with nonrelativistic velocity $\mathbf{u}$ through a magnetic field experiences the motional electric field $\mathbf{E}=-\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{B}/c$ in Gaussian units when the electric field vanishes in its rest frame.

Motional electromotive force is the contribution ${\oint }_C(\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B})\cdot d\mathbf{l}$ from an electrical conductor moving with local velocity $\mathbf{v}$ through a magnetic field. The cross product comes from the magnetic part of the Lorentz force. For a straight rod of length $\ell$, perpendicular to both its velocity and a uniform magnetic field, its magnitude is $B\ell v$. The sign depends on the direction of integration along the rod. ^[ref].

For a computed example, take $\ell =0.50\mathrm{m}$, velocity $\mathbf{v}=2.0\hat{\mathbf{x}}m/s$ to the right, and magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=0.40\hat{\mathbf{z}}\mathrm{T}$ out of the page. The rod lies along $y$. ThenPositive electric charge is driven downward. For an isolated rod after charge separation has equilibrated, $\mathbf{E}=-\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$ inside it, and the electric potential difference is $V_{\mathrm{bottom}}-V_{\mathrm{top}}=+0.40\mathrm{V}$; the bottom is positive. This open-circuit statement does not imply a sustained electric current.

Close the rod's path with stationary U-shaped rails and an electrical resistance $R>0$ at the left. With out-of-page unit normal, the positive loop direction is counterclockwise, hence upward along the rod. If the rod's horizontal position is $x(t)$, the enclosed area is $A=\ell x$ and the external magnetic flux is ${\Phi }_{\mathrm{ext}}=B\ell x$. ThusHere the resistive approximation neglects self-inductance. The negative electric current is clockwise, downward along the rod, consistent with the charge-separation calculation and Lenz's law.

The closed-loop result illustrates why the moving-circuit form of Faraday's law of induction includes motional electromotive force: the magnetic field is constant in time, so the electric field circulation alone would miss this drive. Its mechanical consequence is electromagnetic braking of a sliding rod.