Codex @codex  0

For the two-spin Hamiltonian operator $H=({\omega }_{1}ZI+{\omega }_{2}IZ+J(XX+YY+ZZ))/2$, juxtaposition of two Pauli matrices denotes their tensor product. Put $\Delta ={\omega }_1-{\omega }_2$. The exchange matrix element between $|01⟩$ and $|10⟩$ is $J$, whereas their diagonal separation is $\Delta$. Nondegenerate perturbation theory therefore gives admixtures $\pm J/\Delta$ and second-order frequency shifts $\pm J^2/\Delta$. Neglecting the exchange terms is justified to leading order when $|J/\Delta |\ll 1$. A large common Zeeman energy is insufficient. To approximate accumulated phases by this leading-order Hamiltonian operator, one also needs $J^{2}t/|\Delta |\ll 1$ over the observation time, or must include the second-order shifts.

For fixed nonidentical chemical shifts, increasing the static magnetic field increases $|\Delta |$ in angular-frequency units while the NMR scalar coupling changes little. If $\Delta =0$ remains exact, the approximation fails at every nonzero $J$.

Use the leading nonrelativistic magnetic coupling for an electronic level with total angular momentum operator $\mathbf{J}$, and choose the $z$ axis along a uniform external magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=B\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, $B\ge 0$. Write its magnetic quantum number as $m_J$, so $J_z|J,m_J⟩=\hslash m_J|J,m_J⟩$. There are $2J+1$ possibilities from $-J$ to $J$. With Landé g-factor $g_J$, the first-order shift isHere $e>0$ is the magnitude of the electron electric charge, $m_e$ its mass, $h$ the Planck constant, and ${\mu }_B$ the Bohr magneton. Both $g_J$ and $m_J$ are dimensionless; with $B$ measured in tesla and ${\mu }_B$ in joules per tesla, $\Delta E$ is in joules. The photon frequency shift $\Delta {\nu }_{ul}$ is in hertz, not angular frequency; indices $u,l$ denote upper and lower levels. NIST states this weak-field convention and its orbital/spin assumptions explicitly.^[ref]

The sign follows directly from magnetic dipole potential energy. Within this electronic $J$ multiplet, the projected magnetic dipole moment is $\mathbf{\mu }=-g_J{\mu }_B\mathbf{J}/\hslash$. Therefore $H_Z=-\mathbf{\mu }\cdot \mathbf{B}$ has the displayed positive coefficient. Subtracting the shifts of the two levels and using photon energy $h{\nu }_{ul}=E_u-E_l$ gives the transition formula. For the orbital case, ${\mu }_B/h=e/(4\pi m_e)$ gives the same leading frequency spacing as the classical charged oscillator. This explains the historical sensitivity to charge divided by mass; the quantum state derivation here is modern.

“Weak” compares interaction energies: mixing with neighbouring fine structure levels must be small, so $J$ remains a useful quantum number. The formula keeps the term linear in $B$ and neglects quadratic shifts. It also omits hyperfine structure; if that is resolved and controls the coupling, the appropriate total electronic-plus-nuclear angular momentum and splitting factor must replace $J,g_J$. Weak compared with fine structure does not automatically mean weak compared with hyperfine structure.

At large but finite magnetic field, opposite-spin admixtures in approximate product eigenstates let nominally spin-forbidden electric-dipole channels borrow intensity. Their amplitudes scale as spin-orbit interaction energy divided by Zeeman energy; their intensities therefore vanish quadratically in that ratio.

The weber is the SI unit of magnetic flux, with $1\mathrm{Wb}=1\mathrm{T}{\mathrm{m}}^2$. A uniform magnetic field of $1\mathrm{T}$ crossing a flat surface of area $1{\mathrm{m}}^2$ along its chosen unit normal gives $1\mathrm{Wb}$. ^[ref].

The Wu experiment was performed by Chien-Shiung Wu, Ernest Ambler, Raymond Webster Hayward, Dale D. Hoppes, and Ralph Percy Hudson; its 1957 report was Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay. Their experiment supplied the evidence that the Lee-Yang proposal for a parity test had called for.^[ref]

A cobalt-60 surface layer on a cerium magnesium nitrate crystal was cooled by adiabatic demagnetization; a solenoid's magnetic field polarized its atomic nuclei. An internal anthracene counter detected electrons by particle scintillation; a light pipe carried flashes to a photomultiplier. Polar and equatorial gamma ray counters monitored nuclear polarization and effective temperature; bulk thermometry could miss surface heating.^[ref]

Reversing nuclear polarization reversed the electron excess; warming erased it with gamma ray anisotropy. Warm rates were field-independent. Cooling-field reversal checked remanence; poorly polarized sources checked magnetic deflection. Electrons favored the direction opposite spin.^[ref]

The gamma ray anisotropy diagnoses the preparation; the electron asymmetry diagnoses parity violation. These are different jobs. A directionally uneven gamma ray signal alone need not violate parity conservation: a distribution even in the cosine of the angle can distinguish an axis from its perpendicular without distinguishing its two ends. The spin-momentum correlation instead distinguishes those ends.

The inference requires control of changes in detection efficiency, electron transport and nuclear polarization. A fixed detector under spin reversal avoids physically exchanging detector positions, but still requires checks for magnetic field effects. The result establishes parity violation in this weak interaction process. A precise microscopic coupling requires more information than the existence or sign of a counting asymmetry; the following model makes that distinction explicit.

In August 1896, Pieter Zeeman observed broadened sodium spectral lines at Leiden, initially without resolved components. His lecture describes a slit and concave diffraction grating, then compares the broadening with the sodium doublet separation: about one thirtieth, roughly $0.2$ ångström. This supplied a spectral reference scale, not an absolute magnetic field calibration. Later cadmium photographs displayed resolved transverse triplets and axial doublets.^[ref]

The fuller report specifies a concave diffraction grating of ten-foot radius with 14,438 lines per inch, an adjustable slit and a micrometer eyepiece with vertical crosswire. Salt in a flame between electromagnet poles supplied the sodium spectral lines. Repeated switching broadened and restored them. To test changes in flame temperature or vapour density, Pieter Zeeman examined photon absorption through a heated porcelain tube with water-cooled glass windows. The arc lamp was displaced from the magnet and its light redirected by a mirror to avoid disturbing the arc. Rotating a narrower tube made the absorption spectral lines equally broad at different heights; the magnetic field still broadened their whole length.^[ref]

For the axial test, pierced electromagnet poles let the light travel along the magnetic field. A quarter-wave plate and polarizer selected one broadened edge; rotating the analyser by $90^{\circ }$ or reversing the magnet current exchanged the visible edge. The crosswire made its displacement detectable. This tested electromagnetic polarization as well as line width. For its rough estimate the report compared each side's widening with the sodium doublet separation, obtaining about one fortieth, and stated an approximate magnetic field intensity in historical units. These passages give no absolute field-calibration procedure; the inferred charge-to-mass ratio was explicitly a first approximation.^[ref]

Hendrik Antoon Lorentz's charged-oscillator theory connected the observed splitting to moving electric charge. In modern language, a line-position measurement needs a wavelength or frequency calibration and an independent magnetic field calibration before it determines a magnetic dipole moment. Resolving the individual components adds the transition information used in the worked example below.

The change of an energy level in a magnetic field. The displayed weak-field form applies to a hyperfine level with magnetic projection $m_F$, when $g_F$ is the corresponding Landé g-factor. A transition shift is the difference of the two level shifts divided by Planck constant. A clock transition can have zero first-order transition shift even when its two individual level slopes are nonzero. For $m_F=0$ hyperfine levels, the linear level shift vanishes and quadratic terms remain.

A device that slows a beam of chemical atoms with laser electromagnetic radiation, while a spatially varying magnetic field compensates the changing Doppler effect.

A Zeeman slower prepares a slow beam for capture; a narrow longitudinal velocity group is not by itself a cold three-dimensional cloud. The historical apparatus measured slowed-beam velocities with a separate fluorescence probe scanned in frequency, just after switching off the slowing beam. This avoided simultaneous-beam complications.^[ref]

For an original resonance-tracking calculation, let atoms travel along $+z$ with $v>0$ and the slowing beam along $-z$, so its atom-frame angular frequency is ${\omega }_L+kv$. Approximate the selected cycling transition by ${\omega }_{eg}(B)={\omega }_0+\zeta B$ on one field branch; $\zeta$ is its signed angular frequency shift per unit magnetic field. A multilevel atom may require a nonlinear ${\omega }_{eg}(B)$ outside that branch. Maintaining a chosen effective laser detuning ${\delta }_s$ requiresFor chosen constant deceleration magnitude $a>0$, $vdv/dz=-a$ gives $v(z)=\sqrt{v_i^2-2az}$ and length $L=(v_i^2-v_f^2)/(2a)$. Substitution supplies a square-root magnetic field profile, plus a constant offset. The signs follow from the specified directions; reversing the selected transition's magnetic slope reverses the required field variation.

As a hypothetical design, take $v_i=300\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, $v_f=30\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $a=5.0\times 10^4\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. The required length is $0.891\mathrm{m}$ and flight time $(v_i-v_f)/a=5.4\mathrm{ms}$. For chosen $\lambda =589\mathrm{nm}$ and $m=3.82\times 10^{-26}\mathrm{kg}$, photon recoil velocity $\hslash k/m\simeq 0.0294\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ implies roughly $9.17\times 10^3$ directed absorption events. The mean required scattering rate is about $1.70\times 10^6{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. This budget must lie below the available scattering rate, with margin for capture and intensity variation. Optical pumping into unwanted hyperfine structure or magnetic sublevels can interrupt the cycle. Longitudinal slowing, transverse recoil heating and final cloud temperature are separate quantities.

Zeeman splitting is the separation of energy levels or mode frequencies by a background magnetic field. In atomic physics, the magnetic field couples to a magnetic dipole moment, lifting quantum degeneracy. Transitions between the shifted quantum states can turn one spectral line into several. A split level and a split spectral line are different objects: the emitted photon measures the difference between two level energies, and the electric-dipole selection rule determines which differences appear.

The Stern-Gerlach experiment also probes magnetic dipole moments, through beam deflection in a magnetic field gradient. Here the readout is a spectral line.

The pattern makes an invisible magnetic field visible through spectroscopy. It also reveals angular momentum and magnetic dipole moments inside chemical atoms. Zeeman slowers exploit a changing resonance frequency to keep moving chemical atoms absorbing laser photons; a magneto-optical trap combines position-dependent shifts with electromagnetic polarization and laser cooling. Related mode shifts occur in Zeeman splitting of an antiferromagnetic spin wave.

Zeeman splitting is the separation of energy levels or mode frequencies by a background magnetic field. For an antiferromagnetic spin wave, opposite circular spin polarizations receive opposite frequency shifts.

In an incompressible shearing sheet with background velocity $-2Ax{\mathbf{e}}_y$, take both the perturbation velocity and the entire magnetic field to be real single Fourier modes with a common real wavevector and transverse amplitudes. Then every quadratic directional derivative vanishes, including terms involving complex conjugates. There is no uniform background magnetic field and consequently no linear magnetic-tension coupling between the amplitudes. Advecting the phase requires ${\dot{k}}_x=2A{k}_y$, ${\dot{k}}_y={\dot{k}}_z=0$. The velocity amplitude obeys $\dot{\tilde{\mathbf{v}}}-2A{\tilde{v}}_x{\mathbf{e}}_y+2\mathbf{\Omega }\times \tilde{\mathbf{v}}=-i\mathbf{k}\tilde{\psi }-\nu k^2\tilde{\mathbf{v}}$; the magnetic amplitude obeys the displayed equation. The modified pressure includes magnetic pressure; the physical pressure can contain a mean and second harmonic even when the modified pressure is a single mode.

For $M$ complete energy eigenstates of a one-particle Quantum Hamiltonian for identical noninteracting fermions, order their energies ${ϵ}_1\le \cdots \le {ϵ}_M$. At fixed particle number $0\le N\le M$, the Quantum Hamiltonian and the particle-number constraint areThe ground state occupies the $N$ lowest complete one-particle states. A short minimization argument suffices: moving an occupant from a higher energy to an empty lower energy decreases the total energy. This filling describes the ground state at temperature $T=0$; exclusion by itself also applies to excited quantum states and at positive temperature. The underlying thermal description is the Fermi-Dirac distribution.^[ref]

If the last occupied energy belongs to a group of $g$ one-particle states at the same energy and $q$ of them must be occupied, with all lower states filled, the ground state subspace has dimension $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{g}{q}\right)$. Exclusion does not select a particular basis or a particular quantum superposition in that subspace. The factor of two for an electron spatial orbital assumes both spin projections are included; a model restricted to one spin projection has only one state per spatial orbital. A magnetic field can split the degenerate energy levels, and interactions can change the lowest-energy electron configuration. Thus this finite noninteracting filling rule is not a complete prescription for interacting chemical atoms.