Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 27 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An isogeny of elliptic curves over a field is a nonconstant morphism preserving the identity and addition. It is surjective and finite: its image is a closed connected subgroup, and a nonconstant morphism of smooth projective curves is finite. The degree of an isogeny is the degree of its induced extension of function fields. A separable isogeny has degree equal to the number of geometric kernel points; in general the degree is the length of the finite kernel scheme, incorporating inseparability. The degree of an isogeny multiplies under composition, and degree one means an isomorphism. In characteristic zero all elliptic isogenies are separable. In positive characteristic the Frobenius isogeny illustrates inseparability, while an elliptic isogeny of degree prime to the characteristic is separable.
The homomorphism group of elliptic curves includes the zero homomorphism, the constant identity map, and every nonzero member is an elliptic isogeny. The operations are pointwise addition and negation; for endomorphisms, composition also gives the endomorphism ring of an elliptic curve. We put and otherwise. We now prove the positive definiteness of degree on elliptic-curve homomorphisms in full.
Let , and choose a Weierstrass model. Its coordinate has a double pole at , and the generic fibre of consists of and . On the rational function therefore has Weil divisorwhere , , , and . The generic zeros on the two diagonals have multiplicity one, and the generic poles on have multiplicity two; their intersections have codimension two and add no Weil divisor components. This argument also uses the general Weierstrass involution in characteristic , where need not mean changing just the sign of .
For the sum and difference maps and , the divisors and are and . Consequently, for the degree-one line bundle ,Pull back along and take degrees of line bundles on . A nonconstant map pulls back to degree equal to its degree, while a constant map pulls it back to a trivial bundle of degree zero. We obtain the degree parallelogram lawUsing the line-bundle identity is important: it still restricts correctly when or , when restriction of the displayed rational function would be identically zero.
Since , applying the identity to and gives the second-difference recursionStarting from and yields for all integers . DefineIt is symmetric and odd in each variable. Applying the parallelogram identity to the four terms in its first expression givesInterchanging and using oddness also gives . Adding proves ; symmetry proves additivity in the other variable. Thus is a quadratic form with associated rational bilinear form .
Every nonzero homomorphism has positive degree, so for . The scaling identity also shows that the homomorphism group is a torsion-free group. Hence extends to its rational vector space. On the span of any finitely many rationally independent homomorphisms, the matrix of is rational. Positivity on nonzero rational vectors implies nonnegativity on real vectors by density. If the real matrix had a nontrivial kernel, its rational linear equations would have a nonzero rational solution, contradicting positivity. Thus its real extension is a positive-definite quadratic form. This establishes the requested positivity as well as the quadratic identities.
An important companion to degree is the dual isogeny. Under via , the pullback defines . Divisor pushforward corresponds to , and pushforward after pullback multiplies divisor classes by . Therefore . Composing shows that takes values in the finite kernel of ; a morphism from a connected smooth curve into this finite scheme must be constant, and its identity value is zero. ThusThe last equality follows from , already proved by applying to the identity map. The dual isogeny is unique, since the difference of two choices composed with would vanish and is surjective. It follows that being isogenous is an equivalence relation: duality supplies symmetry, and composition supplies transitivity. For a finite subgroup of geometric points of order prime to the characteristic, the quotient curve and its quotient map give an elliptic isogeny with that kernel; in general one uses finite subgroup schemes. This is the geometric source of explicit descent maps, including the two-isogeny formula in Question 4.
Finally elliptic isogenies preserve the rational rank of an abelian group over a number field. Their dual compositions are multiplication by , so after tensoring the rational point groups with the elliptic isogeny becomes invertible. For a single curve, its endomorphism algebra in characteristic zero is or an imaginary quadratic field, giving ordinary integer multiplication or complex multiplication. In positive characteristic a supersingular curve can instead have a quaternionic endomorphism algebra. The positive degree form controls the sizes of these homomorphisms, while duality makes their arithmetic and geometric properties accessible.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 27 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a number field and an elliptic curve. Heights measure the arithmetic size of points, and turn the finite quotient supplied by the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem into finite generation. For a projective point define the Absolute logarithmic Weil heightusing the usual normalized absolute values and local degrees . The product formula makes this independent of scaling and of enlarging . For a Short Weierstrass form put and . Over , if in lowest terms, .
The finiteness property is Northcott theorem: for bounded height and bounded degree over there are only finitely many algebraic numbers. One sees the mechanism from the height-Mahler measure formula. If has degree and height at most , its primitive integral minimal polynomial has Mahler measure . Expanding its product of linear factors bounds every coefficient by . Only finitely many integral polynomials satisfy this bound, and each has finitely many roots. Thus a height bound gives only finitely many -coordinates in the fixed number field , and each gives at most two points of , besides .
To understand multiplication, the doubling formula givesIts homogeneous numerator and denominator have degree four. They have no common projective zero: at infinity the numerator is nonzero, and at a root of the numerator equals , since it is . Nonsingularity excludes a common root of . The coordinate doubling map is therefore a degree-four morphism of the projective line.
The general height growth under a morphism of the projective line is for a fixed degree- morphism. Here is why the error is bounded independently of . At a place , normalize its homogeneous coordinates to have maximum norm . The fixed homogeneous forms have uniformly bounded norm. They also have a positive lower bound: the normalized coordinate space is compact over , and their common zero set is empty. Outside finitely many places their coefficients are integral and their reduction has no common zero, making both bounds . Homogeneity and summation over places then give the asserted height estimate. Consequently there is a fixed with
Define the canonical height of an elliptic curve by the conventional normalizationThe successive approximants differ by at most , so the limit exists andThus canonical height retains Northcott finiteness, while replacing the bounded-error doubling rule by an exact one.
We also need the height parallelogram identity. It follows from the symmetric-square proof of the naive height parallelogram estimate, which we give explicitly using the supplied addition formulae. For , the unordered pair is represented by the binary quadratic , whereThese forms define the biquadratic morphism for elliptic sums and differences. They have no common zero. If , the two projective coordinates agree. On the finite diagonal , and , so simultaneous vanishing would violate nonsingularity. At the homogeneous is nonzero. This also handles and sums or differences equal to , for which the affine fractions alone would be inappropriate.
The same local norm argument as above, now using bidegree , givesOn the other hand the binary quadratic is the product of two linear factors for and . At nonarchimedean places coefficient maximum norms multiply exactly: scale each factor to norm and reduce; the product of the two nonzero residue polynomials remains nonzero. This is multiplicativity of the nonarchimedean polynomial norm. At archimedean places the norms are comparable up to fixed constants, by the coefficient triangle inequality and compactness of normalized linear factors. ThereforeCombining the estimates proves the naive-height parallelogram relation with a uniform error. Apply it to , divide by , and pass to the limit to obtainAs in the polarization argument of (a), this makes quadratic, with the canonical height pairingA torsion point has canonical height zero because its multiples have bounded naive height. Conversely, if , then all have bounded naive height. Northcott finiteness makes two equal, giving for some . Thus canonical height vanishes exactly on torsion. In particular the torsion subgroup is finite, since the comparison with naive height bounds the heights of all its points.
We can now prove the Mordell-Weil theorem. The Weak Mordell-Weil theorem, as explained in Question 2(ii), makes finite. Choose representatives and put . Every can be written . The parallelogram identity and nonnegativity giveIterating this height descent makes the height at step at most , so after finitely many steps it is at most . There are only finitely many points of that height by Northcott and the naive-height comparison. Reversing shows that every point is an integer combination of the finitely many representatives and this finite bounded-height set. ThereforeOn the resulting free part the canonical height pairing is positive definite. Its nonnegativity extends from rational vectors to real vectors by density. If a nonzero real vector were in its kernel, in a basis of the free part round to integer vectors . Their rounding errors are uniformly bounded, and would be uniformly bounded. The vectors are unbounded and therefore include infinitely many distinct vectors, contradicting Northcott finiteness. Thus there is no real null vector. Heights consequently support quantitative point searches, tests of independence, and the regulator of an elliptic curve, in addition to providing the descent that proves finite generation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 28 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a field, a separable closure and its absolute Galois group. A discrete Galois module is an abelian group with a continuous -action, so each element has an open stabilizer. Galois cohomology uses continuous cochains. Its zeroth group is , and its first group iswhereThus cocycles measure a failure of descent, and coboundaries account for changing a chosen lift. A short exact sequence of Galois modules gives a long exact sequence in group cohomology. Its connecting map sends an invariant element of a quotient to the cocycle of a chosen lift ; changing the lift changes this by a coboundary. These constructions provide the bridge between arithmetic divisibility and cohomology.
For Kummer theory, assume the characteristic does not divide . The multiplicative exact sequence isThe final arrow is surjective because a root of is separable for . Hilbert's theorem 90 says . Here is its usual finite-extension proof. For a multiplicative cocycle on a finite Galois extension , choose so thatSuch an exists by the Artin independence theorem. The cocycle identity gives . With this becomes , a coboundary. Every continuous cocycle with values in is defined over a sufficiently large finite Galois extension, so the same result holds for the absolute group.
The long exact sequence in group cohomology now givesThe class of maps to , where . This cohomological statement does not require ; it retains the actual Galois action on . If all th roots of unity do lie in , the action is trivial, and after choosing a primitive root of unity the cocycles are characters into . Thus adjoining an th root of describes a cyclic extension of degree dividing , and Kummer classes classify the corresponding characters. For , this gives the familiar quadratic extensions and the square-class group of a field.
Now let be a number field and an elliptic curve. The multiplication-by-n morphism is a surjective isogeny on , with kernel . The Kummer exact sequence of an elliptic curveyieldsExplicitly, choose with and set . This lies in , satisfies the cocycle identity and is unchanged as a class if is replaced by another division point. If it is a coboundary for , then is rational over and . Conversely such a rational division point makes the cocycle zero. This proves the injectivity of the Kummer map of an elliptic curve on .
To prove the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem, it remains to prove that this particular cohomological image is finite. The full group need not be finite, so the injection alone is not enough. Choose a finite set of finite places containing the bad-reduction places and those dividing . At any other place, the construction in Question 3 works over the local field: reduce , find an -division point over a finite residue extension, lift it by the Hensel lemma, and correct its error by the inverse formal multiplication. Thus has an -division point over the maximal unramified extension. Choosing that lift locally makes the cocycle zero on inertia. For an arbitrary lift its restriction is a coboundary, so the cohomology class is unramified. Therefore the image lies in first Galois cohomology unramified outside a finite set:We prove the required finiteness of this group. Take a finite Galois extension containing all of and , and enlarge to include any remaining ramification of . Let be the places above it. The inflation-restriction exact sequence bounds the kernel of restriction to bya finite group, since both its group of arguments and its group of values are finite. Over the torsion module is constant and can be identified with , so Kummer theory givesRestrictions of our unramified classes remain unramified outside . If a Kummer class is unramified at such a place , its th root can be taken in an unramified local extension. The extended valuation still has integer values, and . Hence is divisible by . Each coordinate therefore lies in the S-unramified power class groupThis group is finite. Indeed, the ideal of away from is . Sending to yields the exact sequenceFor its kernel, a principal lets us divide by an th power to obtain an -unit. For surjectivity, an ideal class killed by has an th power which is principal away from , giving such an . The S-unit group is finitely generated and the ideal class group is finite; hence both end groups are finite, proving finiteness of S-unramified Kummer classes. Restriction has finite image in and finite kernel, so is finite. We concludewhich is the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem and its Kummer-theoretic proof of the weak Mordell-Weil theorem.
This framework also defines the Selmer group of an elliptic curve by imposing that a class in lie in the local Kummer image at every completion. Its classes are unramified outside a fixed finite set, so the same finiteness proof applies. Its relation to rational points isThe Tate–Shafarevich group here measures the difference between locally soluble torsors and globally soluble ones. Finally, the weak theorem gives finite divisibility quotients; adding the height descent lemma and bounded-height finiteness proves the stronger Mordell-Weil theorem. Those height inputs are additional to the cohomological finiteness just established.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 32 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , where is an algebraic integer with monic minimal polynomial , and put . The Kummer-Dedekind theorem applies to a prime number with . Write its reduction as a product of polynomial factors over :where the are distinct monic irreducible polynomials, choose monic integral lifts . Then the distinct prime ideals above are , andThus the multiplicity of a factor is its ramification index of a prime ideal, and its degree is the residue degree. The hypothesis on the order in a number field is essential: one cannot infer prime ideal factorization from an arbitrary defining polynomial at a prime dividing its index. There is also a relative version over a base number field : if and agree after localization at , factor the minimal polynomial over and use with the same conclusions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 33 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Hecke operators organize modular forms simultaneously by their transformation law and their Fourier coefficients. Work with , its space of weight- modular forms, and its cusp form subspace, with even . Odd weights give zero spaces. The normalization below makes the first coefficient of equal to the th coefficient of , which is the key link between operators and arithmetic.
For with positive determinant, the determinant-normalized slash operator for modular forms isThe automorphy factor identity proves . Positive scalar matrices act trivially. Let be the integral matrices of determinant . Left multiplication by reduces their first column, by Bezout identity, to with ; the determinant then gives . A row shear makes . These are unique determinant-n matrix representatives for Hecke operators, so defineRight multiplication by any element of permutes these left cosets. The slash operator for modular forms identity therefore proves that has the same modular transformation law as . Each summand is holomorphic on the upper half-plane. Its cusp behavior follows explicitly from the coefficient calculation below, so preserves both and .
Insert in the sum. The finite sum over is zero unless , in which case it is . Writing leaves the term with multiplier . Thus the Fourier coefficients of a composite-index Hecke operator areFor use . In particular the constant coefficient becomes , so cusp forms remain cusp forms, andfor a prime number . The absence of negative powers proves cusp holomorphy. Notice that no primality assumption is needed in the composite-index formula.
The Hecke multiplication relations can be derived directly, rather than assumed from the coset description. On Fourier series define auxiliary maps and . They need not separately preserve , but . With , the coefficient formula givesMultiplying on the left by , the term in the sum contributes ; the terms with become . Together with the sum this is exactly . Hence the Hecke prime-power recurrence from q-shift operators isFor coprime , substituting the coefficient formula twice gives a sum over and with coefficient . The divisors correspond uniquely to a divisor , so . The prime-power recurrence, by induction on the smaller exponent, givesCombining the coprime and prime-power formulas provesIn particular the Hecke operators commute, and the modular Hecke algebra is generated by the prime operators.
The analytic reason for simultaneous diagonalization is the Petersson inner productwhich is positive definite on and convergent because of exponential cusp decay. Here is the adjoint argument. For a matrix , set . The left cosets in are represented by with . Unfolding this finite coset sum in the Petersson inner product givesUnder , hyperbolic area is unchanged and the determinant factors in the slash operator for modular forms giveThe integration group becomes . Folding this finite cover back to identifies the adjoint with the correspondence for . For , the matrix is again integral with determinant ; scalar matrices act trivially, and adjugation permutes the double cosets making up . The real normalizing factor is unchanged. Thus this proves that Hecke operators are self-adjoint for the Petersson inner product:The valence formula for the modular group makes a finite-dimensional vector space. Commuting self-adjoint operators on a finite-dimensional inner product space have a common orthogonal eigenbasis: diagonalize one operator, use commutativity to preserve each of its eigenspaces, and repeat within those spaces. Therefore has a basis of Hecke eigenforms, with real Hecke operator eigenvalues.
If is a common Hecke eigenform, say , its first Fourier coefficient cannot vanish: would imply for every . Normalize . Then the Hecke operator eigenvalue is precisely the Fourier coefficient . The Hecke multiplication relations becomeConsequently the coefficients are multiplicative at coprime indices, and their local generating function satisfiesThis gives the Euler product of a Hecke eigenformin a half-plane of absolute convergence. The Fourier coefficient bound for a cusp form already supplies such a half-plane; Question 4 improves it to .
The L-function of a cusp form also has an analytic description independent of the Hecke eigenform condition. Termwise Mellin transform in an initial right half-plane givesAt infinity the cusp form decays exponentially. Modular inversion gives , so at zero it is . The integral therefore converges locally uniformly for every , continuing to an entire function. Changing to provesFor a normalized Hecke eigenform, the Euler product of a Hecke eigenform and this functional equation describe the same completed L-function of a cusp form.
There is also an integral arithmetic structure. One standard consequence of the level-one dimension formula and the valence formula for the modular group is the integral triangular basis of level-one modular forms: if with , choose respectively. Thenform a basis of , and the terms form a basis of . Their first nonzero terms are with coefficient one and all coefficients are integers. Successive elimination of coefficients of shows that these cusp basis elements generate exactly the lattice of rational cusp forms with integral Fourier coefficients. The composite-index coefficient formula preserves this lattice, so each has an integral matrix on it. Its characteristic polynomial is monic with integral coefficients. This proves that Hecke eigenvalues are algebraic integers; self-adjointness also makes every root of that characteristic polynomial real. The field generated by the eigenvalues is a finite totally real number field: a finite set of operators spans the finite-dimensional rational modular Hecke algebra, and every conjugate of each eigenvalue remains a root of its real-rooted characteristic polynomial.
Two basic examples connect the operator theory to familiar modular forms. The normalized Eisenstein series has coefficients proportional to . At a prime number its coefficient formula useswhere the second term is zero unless . This follows by writing with and summing a finite geometric series. It proves , and the Hecke multiplication relations give . Meanwhile implies , because . Thus the Ramanujan tau function is multiplicative and satisfies . For example, gives . This illustrates how Hecke operators turn analytic Fourier coefficients into a coherent arithmetic system.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 1 20G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The ideal class group of a number field is the group of nonzero fractional ideals of its ring of integers under multiplication, modulo the subgroup of principal fractional ideals. For degree and pairs of complex embeddings, the Minkowski bound for ideal classes states that each class contains an integral ideal withThere are only finitely many integral ideals of bounded ideal norm: as sublattices of the free abelian group of integers, they have bounded index, and finitely many subgroups have any fixed index. Thus the ideal class group is finite.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 20G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
An integral basis of a degree- number field is a -basis of its ring of integers: each algebraic integer has a unique integer linear combination of those elements. For , the standard quadratic-integer criterion gives , since is squarefree and is not congruent to one modulo four. Thus
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 26 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Galois cohomology and finite quotients. Let be a number field and its absolute Galois group. For a discrete abelian -module , . A continuous 1-cocycle is a map with ; a coboundary has the form . Their quotient is . Short exact sequences of modules give the long exact sequence in group cohomology; the connecting map measures the obstruction to lifting a fixed element to a fixed preimage. This interpretation gives a concrete descent map for an elliptic curve.
For an integer , multiplication on the geometric points gives the exact sequenceHere multiplication is a separable isogeny in characteristic zero, with geometric kernel points. For choose with . Then lies in , satisfies the cocycle identity, and changing changes it by a coboundary. Its class vanishes exactly when : if for , the point is rational and divides . Thus the Kummer exact sequence of an elliptic curve includesThe construction also proves that is a homomorphism. The final group can be interpreted as classes of elliptic-curve torsors killed by ; imposing soluble completions leads to the Selmer group of an elliptic curve. For weak Mordell-Weil, the important task is to bound the arithmetic image of , not to assume that the entire first cohomology group is finite.
Choose a finite set containing the bad primes, primes dividing , and archimedean places. At a good finite place , the class is unramified. Here is the local reason. Over a finite extension of the residue field choose an -division point of the reduction of ; multiplication is surjective on the points over its algebraic closure. Pass to the corresponding unramified extension of and lift this nonsingular point by the Hensel lemma. The discrepancy between times its lift and lies in the kernel of reduction. The formal group of an elliptic curve describes that kernel, and multiplication by is bijective there because its leading coefficient is a unit. Correcting the lift therefore gives an actual division point in the unramified closure. Inertia fixes that point, so the Kummer cocycle vanishes on inertia. The same good-reduction argument shows that itself is unramified outside .
We now prove the required finiteness of unramified cohomology classes. Choose a finite Galois extension over which and the th roots of unity are all rational, and enlarge to include its ramified primes. The inflation-restriction exact sequence shows that restriction to has finite kernel: that kernel comes from , a finite group since both its group and coefficient module are finite. Over , a choice of basis identifies with . The multiplicative Kummer sequence, together with Hilbert 90, givesFor clarity, Hilbert 90 says that a multiplicative cocycle for a finite Galois extension is a coboundary. If its values are , choose so that . Then , so . Such an exists because distinct field automorphisms are linearly independent: a relation with the fewest nonzero terms, evaluated on and compared with its value on multiplied by one automorphism's value on , would produce a shorter nonzero relation. Continuity reduces the absolute-Galois version to a finite extension. This proves the cohomological vanishing used in the multiplicative Kummer sequence.
An unramified Kummer class represented by has at every finite . Indeed an th root of fixed by inertia belongs to an unramified local extension, whose value group is still the integers. DefineFactoring the fractional ideal away from as an th power gives the exact sequenceTo check it, send to the ideal class of its th root ideal. Changing by an th power changes that ideal by a principal ideal. The kernel consists precisely of S-units modulo th powers, and every -torsion ideal class has a representative whose th power is principal, proving surjectivity. The S-unit group is finitely generated by the Dirichlet unit theorem and the finite collection of allowed prime valuations. The localized ideal class group is a quotient of the finite ordinary ideal class group. Both end groups, and hence , are finite. This is the finiteness of S-unramified Kummer classes argument.
The restrictions of the elliptic Kummer image lie in two copies of this finite group, and the restriction kernel is finite. The injection therefore provesThis is the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem. The unramified restriction is essential: even is generally infinite. Cohomology turns divisibility into a cocycle; good reduction restricts its ramification; units and ideal classes supply the arithmetic finiteness.
Height functions and finite generation. Write and use absolute values extending the usual rational ones, with local degrees . The logarithmic height of a projective pair isThe product formula makes it independent of scaling. For , is nonnegative. On a short Weierstrass equation , put and .
Bounded height gives only finitely many rational points. To see the scalar finiteness behind the Northcott theorem, an algebraic number of degree has primitive minimal polynomial , and the product formula gives . If and , every coefficient has absolute value at most . There are only finitely many such integer polynomials and hence finitely many roots. Each x-coordinate lifts to at most two points of , with handled separately. Thus is finite.
The second ingredient is height expansion under doubling:Indeed the duplication formula is the degree-four morphism of the projective x-line represented by the coprime quartic formsThey are coprime because the elliptic curve is nonsingular. At each place their coefficient bounds give . Bezout identities expressing powers of each coordinate as combinations of give the reverse inequality up to another local constant. One obtains these identities by the Euclidean algorithm on the two affine charts and clearing denominators. Only finitely many non-Archimedean places have a constant different from one. Taking weighted logarithms and summing proves the uniform bounded error. This is height growth under a morphism of the projective line, applied with degree four.
For a fixed , the addition formula also givesFor , its x-coordinate isThe curve equation bounds by a local constant times . Both numerator and denominator are consequently bounded by a local constant times . The projective-height definition gives the claimed inequality; the finitely many exceptional points with are absorbed into the constant. For the estimate is immediate.
By weak Mordell-Weil, choose finitely many representatives for . Every can be written . Combining the last two inequalities giveswith one constant for all the representatives. This is naive height contraction in elliptic halving descent. If , the new point has height at least one half less than that of . Repetition must therefore reach the finite set of points of height at most . Reversing the identities shows that every point is generated by this finite terminal set together with the finite list of representatives. ThusThe structure theorem then gives with finite torsion subgroup: this is the Mordell-Weil theorem. Finiteness modulo two alone does not imply finite generation; the contracting height argument is what bridges that gap.
The bounded duplication error also constructs the canonical height of an elliptic curve:The successive differences are bounded by a summable geometric sequence, so the limit exists, , and . It is nonnegative. Torsion points have canonical height zero because their multiples form a finite set. Conversely, if the canonical height is zero, all have bounded naive height; Northcott finiteness makes two of them equal and hence makes torsion. The canonical height removes the bounded error from the arithmetic growth law and identifies exactly the torsion directions, while the elementary naive-height descent already proves finite generation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 23 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The construction must first specify the field of definition of the complex multiplication. Let be a CM elliptic curve and let be its geometric CM field, embedded by its action on an invariant differential. In characteristic zero this action is injective. Consequently every geometric endomorphism is defined over : a Galois automorphism fixing fixes its differential scalar and therefore fixes the endomorphism itself. Initially assume already contains ; we return to the other case below.
Choose a complex embedding and an analytic complex uniformization of an elliptic curvewhere is a lattice in , stable under the CM order . It need not be the maximal order or a principal ideal. Its torsion is described by the finite adelic quotients of this lattice.
The input from the CM reciprocity theorem is precise: if is an idele of , , and , then takes the CM torus to the torus with lattice ; on torsion the comparison is induced by multiplication by . This reciprocity statement comes from the ideal action on CM lattices: an ideal gives the isogeny to , composition multiplies ideals, and adding torsion level structure removes automorphism ambiguity. The resulting action on algebraic CM points is the ray-class Artin action. This is the deep CM input, not an assertion that an arbitrary abelian Galois representation automatically comes from an algebraic Hecke character.
Because fixes , the algebraic curve is . Comparing the reciprocity uniformization with the original one therefore gives multiplication by a scalarThe scalar belongs to : a complex scalar carrying one lattice contained in to another is the quotient of two nonzero lattice elements. Its torsion action isThe uniqueness of the torsion-compatible comparison is important: two possible scalars would induce the same action on all torsion, hence their difference would annihilate torsion of arbitrarily large order and be zero. Multiplying the torsion-action formulas for and now proves .
For , Artin reciprocity sends its principal idele to the identity. The archimedean factors are complex and connected, so its finite part also has trivial Artin image. The preceding formula therefore givesIt follows thatis trivial on principal ideles and defines a character of the idèle class group of . This establishes the multiplicativity and principal-idele condition, rather than merely prescribing Frobenius values and hoping that they extend.
We must still prove continuity and a finite conductor. For a finite place and a prime different from its residue characteristic, an idele supported on the units at has trivial -component of its norm. Thus its action on the Tate module is exactly multiplication by . At a place of good reduction, inertia acts trivially, so . At a bad place, a CM curve has potentially good reduction, and inertia on the prime-to-residue-characteristic Tate module has finite image. Hence is trivial on an open subgroup of the local units there. There are only finitely many bad places. Together these facts give an open finite-congruence kernel on the unit ideles and prove continuity. The archimedean norm factor is already continuous. The potentially-good-reduction and inertia facts are the reduction-theoretic inputs in Serre and Tate's treatment of CM abelian varieties.
Consequently is a Hecke character. In ideal notation, for ,so its infinity type of a Hecke character is the type determined by the chosen CM embedding, with the inverse archimedean norm in the idele convention. Nonmaximal orders merely contribute additional finite-level conditions; the proof retains their lattice and does not replace it by the maximal-order lattice without justification.
At a good prime , choose a uniformizer idele and a prime different from the residue characteristic. Its norm has trivial -component, so arithmetic Frobenius acts on the Tate module by . Specialization of prime-to-residue-characteristic torsion identifies this with the reduced Frobenius isogeny. ThusThe corresponding Hasse-Weil L-function factors as , including the local factors determined by inertia. This explains why the Hecke character encodes both the torsion representations and the Euler factors.
If does not contain , apply the construction over . The two conjugate CM characters are exchanged by the nontrivial automorphism of , and the two-dimensional Galois representation over is their induced representation. In that case the natural description is by induction, rather than a pair of one-dimensional characters over . Question 3 supplies a concrete example: does not define , whereas does. This completes the existence argument for an arbitrary CM curve over a number field, with its field of definition correctly accounted for.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 24 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First include the trivial absolute value if that convention is allowed. For a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value on , every integer has absolute value on a field at most one, and some nonzero integer has absolute value on a field less than one: otherwise every nonzero rational number, being a quotient of two integers, would have absolute value on a field one. Factoring that integer shows that some prime number has .
There cannot be two such prime numbers. If and for distinct prime numbers, choose integers with . Then the ultrametric inequality givesEvery other prime number therefore has absolute value on a field one. Factoring numerator and denominator of a rational number givesThus the nontrivial equivalence classes are precisely the p-adic absolute values, one for each prime number.
Now let be a number field, with ring of integers of a number field . If the restriction of an absolute value on a field to is trivial, a monic polynomial over satisfied by forces : if , its leading term would strictly dominate the other terms. Applying the same argument to forces for . Thus a nontrivial absolute value on a field defined on has a nontrivial restriction, associated with some prime number .
Every has , by applying the same leading-term argument to its monic integral equation. Consequentlyis a proper prime ideal: it is an ideal by the ultrametric inequality, and with implies that at least one factor has absolute value on a field less than one. It is nonzero because it contains .
The localization lies in the valuation ring of the absolute value on a field: a denominator outside has absolute value on a field one. Since is a Dedekind domain, is a discrete valuation ring. Choose its uniformizer . Each has a unique expressionBoth and lie in the valuation ring, so . Also belongs to its maximal ideal, hence . Therefore .
Conversely each nonzero prime ideal of gives the Non-Archimedean absolute value for any , using the discrete valuation of . All choices of are equivalent, and different prime ideals are distinguished by the elements of having absolute value on a field less than one. We have proved Non-Archimedean absolute values on a number field:The trivial class is additional when trivial absolute values on a field are admitted.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 26 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let with an algebraic integer, let be its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element, and write . The Kummer-Dedekind theorem applies to a rational prime not dividing the finite index . Ifwith distinct monic irreducible polynomials , choose monic integer lifts . Then the distinct prime ideals above areIn particular, is unramified precisely when has no repeated irreducible factor. The exclusion of primes dividing the index is essential.
Here is the quotient-ring proof of the Kummer-Dedekind theorem. The finite group has order coprime to . Localizing at the integers coprime to therefore gives , and reduction yieldsThe second isomorphism follows from . The Chinese remainder theorem givesEach factor is a local ring with unique maximal ideal generated by and residue field . Pulling its maximal ideal back to gives exactly ; these exhaust the primes above . This proves the asserted residue degrees and their independence of the chosen lifts.
It remains to prove the exponents rather than simply identify the primes. Unique prime ideal factorization in the Dedekind domain writes . At , its discrete valuation ring has , with a unit. Thus the maximal ideal of has nilpotence index of an ideal : its th power is zero and its st is nonzero. In this index is , since but . The displayed product isomorphism identifies these local factors, hence . This completes the theorem's proof. The same local argument works over a base number field whenever equals the full relative ring of integers after localizing at the chosen base prime.
For the required cyclotomic field, the allowed ring of integers formula makes the index one. Its cyclotomic polynomial isFor , the polynomial has derivative coprime to it modulo . Its divisor is therefore squarefree, so the Kummer-Dedekind theorem gives no ramification.
The cyclotomic reduction at a conductor prime is explicit at the remaining two primes:The quartic over has no linear factor. Its only possible irreducible quadratic divisor would be , whose roots have order three, whereas its own roots have order five. Hence it is irreducible. The two quartics over are also irreducible: their roots have multiplicative order sixteen because their fourth powers are or , both of order four; the finite-field Frobenius automorphism has orbit length four on an element of order sixteen, since and neither nor is modulo sixteen.
Consequently the prime ideal factorization above has one prime with ramification index eight and residue degree four. Above it has two primes, each with ramification index four and residue degree four. In particular,
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 26 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We use the Dirichlet density form of the Chebotarev density theorem, the version directly proved by the permitted information at . If is a finite Galois extension of number fields with group and is a conjugacy class, let be the unramified prime ideals of whose Frobenius conjugacy class is . ThenThe same conclusion holds for a union of conjugacy classes, replacing by the size of that union. The denominator may equivalently be the sum over all primes of . Here and below is real. This specifies the density being proved; an unweighted prime-counting asymptotic is a stronger formulation and is not being inferred merely from a limit at one.
First establish the necessary pole for a general base field. The Dedekind zeta function as a permutation Artin L-function gives it using exactly the allowed assumptions. Take a finite normal closure of , and let be the permutation representation on . Its trivial constituent has multiplicity one: an invariant function on the transitive set of embeddings is constant. At a rational prime, a basis of consists of the sums over inertia orbits of embeddings. Frobenius automorphism permutes these orbit sums. Within the decomposition-group orbit belonging to a prime of , the resulting cycle has length , because the residue embeddings are permuted cyclically by finite-field Frobenius. A cycle of length has determinant . Consequently the local factor of an Artin L-function givesincluding at ramified primes. Decomposing givesAll factors after are holomorphic and nonzero at one by the allowed hypothesis. Thus has a simple pole there andThis argument also explains why the trivial relative Artin L-function is , rather than always the Riemann zeta function.
Now let be an irreducible character of , of degree . At an unramified prime the Euler product has local factor , where is a Frobenius representative. The eigenvalues of are roots of unity, since has finite order. Expanding the logarithm for therefore giveswhere the finitely many ramified local factors contribute a function bounded as . They are nonzero and finite near one because their eigenvalues have modulus one while .
The terms are uniformly bounded. Indeed , and for and ,There are at most primes of above each rational prime and each has norm at least that prime. Hence . Isolating proves the character prime sums in the Chebotarev proof identityFor nontrivial , the allowed holomorphy and nonvanishing at one give a local holomorphic logarithm and a bounded right side. The logarithm specified by the Euler series differs from that local branch by a constant multiple of on the real interval near one, so it too is bounded. For the trivial character, the right side is by the pole of . Thus
Expand the conjugacy-class indicator by character orthogonality. For ,To see the coefficient, take its inner product with : . The irreducible characters form an orthonormal basis of class functions, so this is the full expansion. Substituting the prime-sum estimates leaves only the trivial character's logarithmic term:Division by the diverging logarithm proves the theorem. The same trivial-character calculation shows that all primes of have density one; adding or removing finitely many primes does not change a Dirichlet density.
There is a necessary qualification for the final polynomial application: the printed claim is false for degree one. For example, is monic and irreducible in , yet has the root zero modulo every prime. We prove the intended assertion for degree .
Let be the splitting field of the monic irreducible polynomial over , and let be its roots. The Galois group acts transitively on . There is a derangement in a transitive group action: count the pairs satisfying . The orbit-stabilizer theorem givesIf every fixed at least one root, the identity, which fixes , would make this sum at least , a contradiction. Therefore some fixes no root, and neither does any conjugate of .
For completeness, relate this group action to reduction without assuming the desired splitting result. All roots are algebraic integers, since the polynomial is monic. Exclude the finitely many primes ramifying in or dividing the nonzero polynomial discriminant. At a prime over any remaining , the roots reduce to distinct elements of and give all roots of the reduced polynomial. Arithmetic Frobenius permutes them by . A reduced root belongs to exactly when it is fixed by this map. Because reduction is injective on the original root set, this happens exactly when the Frobenius permutation fixes an original root. This proves the Frobenius permutation and roots modulo a prime criterion.
The Chebotarev density theorem assigns the conjugacy class of our fixed-point-free the positive Dirichlet density . All but finitely many of these primes have rootless reduction, so there are infinitely many. More precisely, applying the same argument to the union of all fixed-point-free classes gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 3 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An extension is an integral extension when every is an integral element over , meaning thatfor some monic polynomial. The Krull dimension of a ring is the supremum of the lengths of strict chains of prime ideals; the number counted is the number of inclusions.
We prove the prime-chain facts needed for integral extensions preserve Krull dimension. Taking quotients preserves an integral equation. Localizing both rings by the same multiplicative subset of also preserves integrality: for , divide the equation for by , so its new coefficients are . Localizing just at all elements outside one of its primes would not be the same operation.
Two elementary field observations are useful. If a field is integral over a subdomain , then is a field, by the inverse argument given in Question 2. Conversely, if an integral domain is integral over a field , every nonzero has a monic equation with nonzero constant term: cancel a factor of from an equation if necessary. Dividing by and by that constant term expresses as a polynomial in . Thus is a field. In particular, the contraction of a maximal ideal under an integral extension is maximal.
For the Lying-over theorem, fix and localize by . The nonzero domain is integral over the local ring . Choose a maximal ideal of . Its contraction is maximal in , so it is the unique maximal ideal . The prime ideal correspondence for localization now pulls back to a prime ideal of with .
For the going-up theorem, suppose and . The injection is still integral. Apply the just-proved Lying-over theorem to . Pulling the resulting prime back gives with .
For the incomparability theorem for integral extensions, suppose have the same contraction . Write and . The latter is a domain integral over . Localizing both by makes integral over the fraction field of , so is a field. The prime is disjoint from and therefore localizes to a proper prime, which must be zero in this field. Since is a domain and all denominators are nonzero, an element of whose localization is zero was already zero. Hence , proving .
A strict prime chain in therefore contracts to a strict chain in , giving . Conversely, start over the bottom of any finite prime chain in using Lying-over theorem, and successively use going-up theorem to lift the entire chain. Distinct contractions ensure that the lifted inclusions are strict, giving the reverse inequality. Taking suprema, including when arbitrarily long chains exist, proves
For an algebraic extension , its ring of algebraic integers is an integral extension of . The primes of are and the maximal ideals , so the longest strict chains have length one; for example . The preceding argument yieldsThis Krull dimension of rings of algebraic integers argument also covers infinite algebraic extensions. It uses integrality, not an assumption that is a number field or that is Noetherian.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 4 20F ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The Dirichlet unit theorem states that for a number field with real embeddings and conjugate pairs of nonreal embeddings,where is its finite cyclic group of roots of unity. Equivalently there exist multiplicatively independent fundamental units such that every unit is a unique product of a root of unity and integer powers of those units.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 26 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let and . The cyclotomic character identifiesChoose with cyclotomic value , and putThe Iwasawa algebra of is . Conjugation, independent of lift as in the preceding solution, makes a compact Galois module over this ring. It is the p-ramified Iwasawa module, not the unramified class-group module.
Because is a unit in , the Teichmüller character gives orthogonal character idempotentsThey sum to one, so , where . Each is a module over the one-variable ring . Complex conjugation is the element of ; characters with are even, and those with are odd.
The basic Iwasawa-module rank theorem in this tower givesIn particular,Thus it would be incorrect to describe all of as a torsion module.
Here is the class-field unit sequence explaining these ranks. Let be the inverse limit, under local norms, of the pro- completions of the unit groups at the unique prime over in . Let be the inverse limit of the closures of the global units in these local unit groups, and letunder ideal norms. The Artin reciprocity maps yieldThe final module is the unramified Iwasawa module and is finitely generated torsion, as proved in the other essay. Local-unit theory gives Iwasawa-module rank , with rank one in each -character. The Leopoldt theorem for abelian number fields gives rank , with rank one in each even character and zero in each odd character. In odd characters the possible norm-compatible roots of unity contribute a rank-zero term, not a free summand. Subtracting ranks in the exact sequence gives the displayed result and also finite generation.
For any character, the Iwasawa module structure theorem describes up to pseudo-isomorphism:where the are irreducible distinguished polynomials and the kernel and cokernel of a pseudo-isomorphism are finite. For a torsion component, its characteristic ideal is generated byThe Iwasawa invariants are and . A characteristic ideal describes the elementary divisors only in aggregate; it is not an assertion that the module is cyclic or that an odd component is actually free.
The trivial character component is zero. Indeed, the maximal abelian pro- extension of unramified outside is precisely the rational cyclotomic Zp-extension, by the Kronecker–Weber theorem. Coprime descent using the character idempotent , followed by the abelianization over a Zp-extension formula, identifies with the additional abelian pro- quotient over . There is no such extension beyond the cyclotomic one, so , and the Compact Nakayama lemma gives .
The central arithmetic description concerns the nontrivial even characters. Let be the integral Kubota-Leopoldt p-adic L-function power series with conventionFor positive integers of the matching parity, the interpolation iswhere the Dirichlet character in the Euler factor is its primitive associate, and is a generalized Bernoulli number. The Iwasawa main conjecture, a theorem here, saysThe trivial character is excluded from this displayed analytic normalization: its -adic zeta function has a pole and must be treated separately.
The proof mechanism starts with norm-compatible cyclotomic units, for instance ratiosand their character projections. A Coleman power series encodes a norm-compatible local unit by a single power series. Applying its logarithmic derivative to these cyclotomic units produces the p-adic L-function above. If denotes their closed norm-limit module, this calculation determinesThe remaining global input isfor nontrivial even . In the class-field unit sequence modulo , multiplicativity of characteristic ideals cancels these two terms and gives the boxed formula for .
There are two established routes to this global input. The Mazur-Wiles theorem constructs suitable abelian extensions from Galois representations associated with modular forms and the Eisenstein ideal; their sizes supply the missing divisibility. The cyclotomic Euler system route uses norm relations for cyclotomic units at auxiliary primes and descent to bound the class-group module. The analytic class number formula and the cyclotomic-unit index formula then supply the equality of characteristic ideals. These are substantial arithmetic theorems, rather than consequences of the abstract structure theorem alone.
A useful further result is the Ferrero-Washington theorem: for this cyclotomic tower, more generally for cyclotomic towers of abelian number fields. Its proof rules out an identically zero reduction modulo of the relevant -adic -series, using distribution of -adic digits. Together with the main conjecture, it gives for each nontrivial even . Therefore these torsion components are finitely generated over up to finite error.
Finally, Kummer reflection in Iwasawa theory relates the even -ramified module to an odd unramified component:where is the Tate twist by the cyclotomic character. The corresponding power-series substitution isThis explains why the -ramified interpolation involves while the reflected class-group interpolation involves . Both the involution and the twist matter. The rank theorem, the class-field sequence, the structure theorem and the explicit even-character characteristic ideals together give the known compact Galois module structure; none justifies replacing every odd component by a free module without further argument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 28 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Herbrand quotient and local norm indices. Let have order . For an additive -module , put and . The relevant Tate cohomology of a cyclic group groups areIf both groups are finite, their size ratio is the Herbrand quotientMultiplicative modules use products for and . A finite module has quotient one: , while , and the two cohomology orders are equal. The six-term periodic cohomology sequence shows for a short exact sequence when these groups are finite. Thus the quotient is unchanged by finite-index changes of lattices. For the trivial -module , the zeroth group is and the negative first group is zero, so .
Now let be a cyclic extension of p-adic fields of degree . For a sufficiently deep principal unit subgroup , the p-adic logarithm is a -equivariant isomorphism with the additive p-adic lattice ; it suffices to take . The normal basis theorem makes a regular -module. Consequently , as a -lattice, is commensurable with a direct sum of copies of . These regular lattices have zero Tate groups: its invariants are the multiples of the sum of the basis elements, every such element is a norm, and vectors with coefficient sum zero are images of . Commensurability and the finite-module calculation give . Since is finite, . These comparisons also establish finiteness of the Tate groups concerned.
The valuation exact sequence now gives . Hilbert theorem 90 makes trivial. One can prove the cyclic statement directly: for of norm one set , and choose for which . Such a exists by linear independence of distinct field automorphisms. Then , so is a coboundary. Therefore the local cyclic norm index isThis is the central use of the Herbrand quotient: it calculates a norm index without first constructing the local reciprocity map.
Let be the ramification index and residue degree. With normalized integer valuations, . A norm is a unit exactly when its preimage is a unit, and the norm valuations fill . Hence there is an exact sequenceThe unit norm index is . In an unramified extension all units are norms and the obstruction is the valuation modulo ; in a totally ramified cyclic extension the entire index comes from units. The norm subgroup is open: on deep principal units, logarithm carries the norm to the field trace, and the trace of a full p-adic lattice contains a sufficiently deep p-adic lattice in .
Hilbert norm residue symbol and the local-to-global principle. More generally, for a local field containing , fix the local reciprocity map with uniformizers acting as arithmetic Frobenius on unramified extensions. The Hilbert norm residue symbol isThis is independent of the chosen root, is bilinear, and has value one exactly when is a norm from . These are standard consequences of Local Artin reciprocity. The case , for which the values are signs, is the one directly governing quadratic forms. The quadratic Hilbert symbol at a place is defined for bywith value one for all when is a square. Equivalently it is one precisely when has a nonzero solution over . For nonsquare , a solution has and gives ; the converse follows from the same norm identity. When is square the conic is already isotropic. Symmetry follows from this conic criterion. The local cyclic norm index gives a norm subgroup of index two; its sign character is multiplicative in , and symmetry gives multiplicativity in . Thus the symbol is a nondegenerate bilinear pairing on the square-class group of a field, since every nonsquare gives a nontrivial norm character. Also , because , and .
For an odd-residue-characteristic p-adic field with residue size , write , , and let be the quadratic character of the residue units. ThenThe unramified quadratic extension has every unit as a norm and only even norm valuations; in a ramified quadratic extension the norm of a unit has square residue. The preceding unit norm index is two, so the square-residue condition in the ramified case is also sufficient. These facts, together with , determine the formula on the generators of the square-class group. At a real place the symbol is negative exactly when both arguments are negative, and at a complex place it is always one. For , with odd units, the dyadic formula isOnly residue classes modulo eight and the parities of enter; other dyadic fields retain the norm definition.
The Hilbert reciprocity law states for . Only finitely many factors can be nontrivial: outside the places above two, the Archimedean places, and the finite places where or is not a unit, the odd-residue formula gives one. For this product formula is a formulation of quadratic reciprocity, including its supplementary laws. It forces local norm obstructions to occur with compatible parity. It is a necessary compatibility law, not by itself a substitute for the following local-to-global theorem.
The Hasse-Minkowski theorem states that a nondegenerate quadratic form over a number field has a nonzero isotropic vector if and only if it does over every completion. Equivalently, two nondegenerate quadratic forms are isometric globally if and only if they are isometric at every place. The forward directions are immediate; the reverse directions are the substantive global theorem. Over non-Archimedean completions, local isometry classes are determined by dimension, determinant square class and the Hasse invariant of a quadratic formAt real places one uses signature, and at complex places dimension suffices. Reciprocity gives for a globally diagonalized form. These invariants make the theorem practically usable: local square classes and norm characters replace an unrestricted search for rational solutions. In particular every quadratic form of dimension at least five over a p-adic field is isotropic; for such a form over a number field the only isotropy obstructions are definite signatures at real places.
As a concrete application, take nonsquare . Then is a global norm from if and only if at every place. The local conditions make the ternary form isotropic everywhere. Hasse-Minkowski theorem gives a global solution of ; since is nonsquare, cannot be zero, and division by gives the global norm. For example fails to be a norm from already at the real place. Thus the quadratic Hilbert symbol detects local norm solvability, while the Hasse-Minkowski theorem turns solvability at all places into a global quadratic solution. The reciprocity and local-to-global theorems in this essay are stated as standard results; the norm interpretation, bilinearity and application are derived above.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 81 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be an extension of number fields, let be a primitive element of a field extension, and let be its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element. Put and . The Kummer-Dedekind theorem applies at a nonzero prime ideal of when : equivalently, is outside the support of the finite-index quotient . Write the factorization over the residue field aswith distinct monic irreducible polynomials , and choose monic lifts . ThenHere denotes the residue-field degree, and the ramification index of a prime ideal is .
To prove this, the local index condition givesThe final isomorphism is the Chinese remainder theorem. Each factor is a local ring with unique maximal ideal generated by , so its inverse image in is exactly , and its residue field is . This proves the list of primes and the residue-field degrees. For the exponents, localize at . The ring of integers of a number field is a Dedekind domain, so is a discrete valuation ring. If , the quotient has successive layers isomorphic to , and hence -dimension . The corresponding polynomial factor has -dimension . Thus , completing the proof rather than merely identifying the radicals.
For the calculation, set and . The ring of integers of a quadratic field gives , with . The algebraic norm of is , so its principal ideal has ideal norm . Its quotient ring has prime order and is therefore the finite field ; consequently is a prime ideal. In that residue field, and .
Let . Since lies in , the permitted identity gives . Thus the local index condition holds at every prime. The relative minimal polynomial of an algebraic element is , whose reduction isThe roots are distinct. Applying the Kummer-Dedekind theorem givesFor the last equality, evaluation at or in gives and therefore . Both descriptions are the same kernels of these evaluation maps. Each prime has ideal norm , residue-field degree one and ramification index of a prime ideal one.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 81 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a number field and a modulus of a number field , let be the group of fractional ideals prime to , and let consist of principal fractional ideals with at the finite modulus and at the real places in . The ray class group is .
The Main theorem of class field theory states that there is a unique finite abelian ray class field for which the Artin reciprocity map inducesIt is unramified outside the finite modulus and has no ramification at real places omitted from . More generally, subgroups with correspond, with inclusions reversed, to intermediate abelian fields, with Galois group . Every finite abelian extension occurs for some modulus. Equivalently, is the maximal abelian extension with conductor of an abelian extension dividing . This states both reciprocity and the existence theorem of global class field theory.