Let and take without loss of generality. The Boussinesq approximation replaces density by in inertia and pressure acceleration, while retaining the density perturbation in buoyancy. Linearizing about the hydrostatic equilibrium and substituting the normal mode gives
The last two equations give and . The horizontal momentum equation gives
Substituting in the vertical momentum equation yields the Taylor–Goldstein equation:
The buoyancy frequency is real for stable density stratification. The impermeable walls impose .
For a possibly unstable normal mode, ensures never vanishes, so choose one continuous branch of . Substitute into the Taylor–Goldstein equation and collect terms:
Multiplication by puts its first two terms in divergence form:
Multiply by the complex conjugate and apply integration by parts. Since , the boundary term vanishes and the power-transformed Taylor–Goldstein energy identity is
The weight is , not : preserving its complex phase is essential for the subsequent stability proofs.
Choose in the power-transformed Taylor–Goldstein energy identity and let . The result is
Because and , its imaginary part gives
If everywhere, the integral is strictly positive for every nonzero eigenfunction, so a mode with is impossible. Thus the flow is neutrally stable to these inviscid normal modes. This is the Miles–Howard theorem, expressed as a lower bound on the gradient Richardson number. It excludes exponential modal growth; it does not by itself exclude transient growth.
Choose . The power-transformed Taylor–Goldstein energy identity reduces to
The right side is real. For an unstable mode, , so taking the imaginary part gives
Consequently the phase velocity is a weighted average:
The weights are nonnegative and not identically zero. For a nonconstant shear profile, equality at an extremum would force to vanish on an interval where differs from that extremum; uniqueness for the regular ordinary differential equation would then give the zero mode. This is the phase-speed bound for unstable stratified shear modes.
Let be the displacement amplitude of an interface. Its kinematic boundary condition is , on either side, so the first of the jump conditions for stratified inviscid shear flow is
For zero surface tension, pressure is continuous at the displaced interface. Since the background hydrostatic pressure has derivative , linearization gives . Using and the kinematic condition gives
This derivation also works when jumps: the displacement is shared, while the vertical velocity need not be. It avoids ambiguous products of distributions at a discontinuous velocity profile.
Write , , and . The velocity is linear through all three layers, so and has no jump. Each interface has density drop . The jump conditions for stratified inviscid shear flow become
Between interfaces, the Taylor–Goldstein equation is . A decaying solution can therefore be written
Its derivative jumps are , while its values at the interfaces are . Hence the coefficients satisfy
The determinant must vanish. With , and , one has . Expanding gives the dispersion relation for two density interfaces in uniform shear:
Put and . The dispersion relation for two density interfaces in uniform shear is
Its discriminant is , so both roots are real. Their sum is positive; therefore one is negative precisely when their product is negative. That condition is
Solving for gives
In this interval , so is the growing normal mode. At either endpoint the corresponding root is zero and the mode is neutral.
For large , the coupling is exponentially weak. If each interface were isolated, its interfacial gravity waves would have dimensional phase velocities , or
The upper-interface wave travelling against its positive local current has speed . The lower-interface wave travelling against its negative current has speed . Their laboratory speeds match at zero when . Weak interaction then produces counterpropagating wave instability rather than two independent travelling waves.
Figure 1.
Instability band and resonance of the two interface waves
. The shaded band lies between the exact neutral curves. The second panel fixes and compares the isolated counterpropagating phase velocities with the imaginary phase velocity of the coupled unstable mode. Details.
The band has the large-wavenumber form . Exactly at resonance, , so
Thus the instability window and growth rate both become exponentially small as the interfaces become weakly coupled.
For distinct eigenvalues, the formula holds for . If the lower-left entry of is , multiplication by gives . This proves by mathematical induction that
Summing the absolutely convergent matrix exponential series gives
For the repeated eigenvalue , the continuous limit is . This is also the exponential of a two-dimensional Jordan block.
Termwise differentiation of the matrix exponential gives and . Thus satisfies and the prescribed initial condition. Uniqueness for a linear differential equation makes it the solution.
For real , compute
Thus is a non-normal matrix. For distinct eigenvalues, take
These satisfy but have inner product . The eigenvectors are therefore nonorthogonal. When the eigenvalues coincide, only the direction remains as an eigenvector; is a defective Jordan block.
Differentiate the quadratic energy:
For , put . Immediate energy growth occurs precisely when . With both eigenvalues negative, such directions exist iff . Writing , the growing initial conditions are the two opposite open wedges
If , energy decreases. No energy growth at any time, for any initial condition, is possible exactly when
Indeed, this makes the symmetric part of a matrix a negative semidefinite matrix, so along every trajectory. If the product is smaller, the wedges already supply counterexamples at . This is the instantaneous energy-growth criterion for a linear system.
At each fixed time, the maximum over nonzero initial conditions is the optimal energy amplification of a linear system:
Write , and . The symmetric matrix has trace and determinant . Its largest eigenvalue is
An optimal initial condition is a right singular vector of associated with its largest singular value.
Figure 1.
Stable eigenmodes can combine to produce transient energy growth
. For and , the red directions on the unit circle have positive instantaneous energy derivative. The eigenvectors are nonorthogonal. The right panel compares the optimal energy amplification of a linear system with the monotonically decaying energy of each eigenmode. Details.
If , let . Then , so the precise long-time asymptotic statement is
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality shows that the unit initial conditions achieving this leading factor are
This is an adjoint eigenvector, since . It differs from the right eigenvector : the initial condition maximizes the projection onto the slow mode, whereas the eventual state aligns with that right eigenvector. For , even the optimal energy ultimately decays to zero; the prefactor describes enhanced excitation of the slow mode.
The zero streamfunction gives zero velocity. The temperature obeys both prescribed temperature values, has no horizontal gradient, and has zero Laplacian. Thus it satisfies both equations with :
This is the conductive state of Darcy-Bénard convection.
Linearizing about the conductive state gives
The perturbations vanish at . For a normal mode with vertical dependence , put . The two modal equations are and . Eliminating gives
Neutrality requires . The arithmetic-geometric mean inequality bounds this below by , with equality at . The first unstable vertical mode is therefore , giving
The wavelength statement applies at the first onset. At a general larger , maximizing the growth rate within a fixed vertical mode gives , so its preferred wavelength need not remain exactly two. This is the onset of convection in a horizontal Darcy layer.
The full perturbation equations are
where the streamfunction advection bracket is . Put and introduce the slow time , so on the amplitude-dependent fields. Then
The weakly nonlinear expansion balances the small linear growth against the cubic saturation on this slow time scale.
At first order, and . Since and , the first equation fixes . The homogeneous temperature boundary conditions and the second equation remove any horizontally uniform term, giving
At second order,
The forcing is horizontally uniform. Taking no additional critical-mode component, a solution satisfying the homogeneous boundaries is
This mean-temperature correction in weakly nonlinear Darcy convection modifies the vertical temperature gradient and provides the feedback that saturates the convection.
Figure 1.
Critical Darcy convection rolls and their temperature perturbation
. Arrows show the velocity generated by the streamfunction . Colour shows on a horizontal period of length two: warm perturbations rise and cool perturbations sink. Details.
Let and denote the full third-order coefficients. This notation keeps the detuning term, proportional to , and the slow-time term, proportional to , visible. Define
The equations at order are
Equivalently, where , the question's coefficients satisfy and . Eliminate from the full coefficients:
Use the Fredholm solvability condition for a self-adjoint operator. With , projection onto the critical eigenfunction makes the left side vanish. Therefore the Landau amplitude equation is
These integrals already answer the requested coefficient calculation. Evaluating them gives , , and . Hence, for the prescribed normalization,
The cubic term opposes growth, so the nonzero steady amplitudes are stable equilibria within the chosen roll phase. The conductive state is unstable for this positive detuning. This is supercritical saturation of Darcy convection rolls.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.