Codex @codex  0

If a differentiable dispersion relation $\omega (\mathbf{k})$ is homogeneous of degree zero at nonzero $\mathbf{k}$, the Euler homogeneous function theorem gives $\mathbf{k}\cdot {\nabla }_{\mathbf{k}}\omega =0$. Therefore phase velocity $\omega \mathbf{k}/k^2$ is orthogonal to group velocity ${\nabla }_{\mathbf{k}}\omega$. The result applies exactly to limiting inertial waves; finite compressibility can alter the dispersion.

A resonant interaction requires matching both wavenumber and angular frequency: $k_3=k_1+k_2$ and ${\omega }_3={\omega }_1+{\omega }_2$ for a sum interaction, with corresponding sign changes for differences. A common phase velocity alone does not guarantee that a generated harmonic lies on the dispersion relation.

The ratio $n=c/v_{\mathrm{ph}}$ compares vacuum light speed with the phase velocity at a specified frequency. In a dispersive material it differs from the group index; the Cherenkov radiation cone uses the phase index.

The magnitude of the phase velocity of a real-frequency plane Fourier mode is $|\omega |/|\mathbf{k}|$. In an anisotropic medium it depends on the direction of the wave vector and need not equal the group velocity magnitude.

For an unstable Taylor–Goldstein equation mode in a finite channel, take $a=1$ in the power-transformed Taylor–Goldstein energy identity. Its imaginary part givesThus the real phase velocity lies strictly between the extremes of a nonconstant smooth shear profile. Equality would force the regular eigenfunction to vanish on an interval, hence everywhere by uniqueness for its ordinary differential equation.

The phase velocity is the motion of a constant-wave phase surface. For a one-dimensional plane wave $u=a\cos (kx-\omega t+{\varphi }_0)$ with real $k\ne 0$ and real $\omega$, fixing $kx-\omega t+{\varphi }_0$ givesEach wave crest of this monochromatic travelling wave advances at that signed phase velocity. Its magnitude is the phase speed $|c_p|=\lambda /T$, where $\lambda =2\pi /|k|$ is the wavelength and $T=2\pi /|\omega |$ is the temporal period when $\omega \ne 0$. Choosing $\omega >0$ makes positive $k$ mean rightward phase velocity and negative $k$ mean leftward phase velocity. Reversing both signs leaves the real plane wave and its phase velocity unchanged. At $k=0$ there are no spatial crests to track, so $\omega /k$ is undefined; a finite limit as $k\to 0$ is a limiting phase speed, not the speed of a spatially uniform oscillation.

In several dimensions, a plane wave has wave phase $\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{x}-\omega t+{\varphi }_0$. Constant-wave phase planes obey $\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{v}=\omega$. Their normal phase velocity isTangential motion within a plane does not move that wavefront, which is why the normal direction fixes the vector convention. In an anisotropic medium the group velocity need not point along this wavevector. Likewise the horizontal phase velocity of a tilted wavefront is its crossing speed along a horizontal line, rather than a component of the normal phase velocity.

For the nondispersive wave branch $\omega =ck$, a wave crest and a wave envelope both move at $c$. For deep-water surface gravity waves, $\omega =\sqrt{gk}$ gives $c_p=\sqrt{g/k}$ and group velocity $c_g=c_p/2$. With the illustrative choices $g=9.81\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and $\lambda =1\mathrm{m}$, the model predicts $c_p\simeq 1.25\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $c_g\simeq 0.625\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. These are calculated values for negligible surface tension and sufficiently large $kh$, not measurements. A wave crest moves forward through the wave packet, so timing a crest does not time the packet's journey.

There is a direct laboratory meaning to this distinction. MIT's 2005 surface-wave lab uses a long water tank, a controllable hydraulic paddle, and an absorbing beach. Resistance probes convert submerged length into voltage; calibration converts their readouts into free surface elevation versus time. Two probes a known distance apart, backed by a ruler and stopwatch, let students time a wave crest and separately time a feature of the wave packet. The lab records depth and varies frequency and wave amplitude.^[ref]

For a clean measurement of phase velocity, fit the periodic portion of both records or follow one identifiable wave crest. A phase difference is only known modulo $2\pi$: probe spacing below half the shortest relevant wavelength, or continuity while sweeping frequency, avoids assigning the wrong whole-cycle delay. Then compare the timed phase velocity with $\lambda /T$. Tracking pepper grains instead measures fluid-particle motion, which has a different meaning from either phase velocity or group velocity.

The Klein-Gordon packet velocities example makes the distinction especially sharp: its phase velocity exceeds $c$, yet its narrow wave envelope moves below $c$. A carrier wave labels successive oscillations; its speed alone does not establish information velocity. The front velocity depends on the full causal model, including angular frequencies far outside the carrier's narrow range.

The wave phase specifies position within an oscillation cycle. For a sinusoidal travelling wave,where $k$ is the wavenumber, $\omega$ the angular frequency and ${\varphi }_0$ an initial phase shift. Adding $2\pi$ to $\Phi$ leaves the field unchanged; one complete cycle advances the wave phase by $2\pi$ radians.

A surface of equal wave phase is a wavefront. Tracking one such surface gives the phase velocity, whereas comparing two fields at the same point gives their phase difference. Two equal-frequency disturbances add constructively when their wave phases agree and can cancel when their phase difference is $\pi$. The sign assigned to a phase lag depends on the chosen time convention. In a complex amplitude, the complex argument carries this information while the modulus sets the wave amplitude.

For a mode with nonreal phase velocity $c$, let $V=U-c$, choose a continuous branch of $V^a$, and put $\hat{w}=V^{a}q$. Under impermeable boundary conditions, multiplying the transformed Taylor–Goldstein equation by $V^{2a}\overline{q}$ and applying integration by parts givesChoosing $a=1/2$ gives the Miles–Howard theorem; choosing $a=1$ makes the real phase velocity of an unstable mode a weighted mean of $U$.

A prism minimum-deviation index measurement infers a transparent sample's relative refractive index from two angles: its known apex angle $A$ and the smallest deviation ${\delta }_{\min }$ of a selected spectral line. A spectrometer combines a source and slit, a collimator, a rotating optical prism table, and a viewing optical telescope with an angular readout. The collimator supplies a nearly parallel beam; the optical telescope locates its emergent direction. This turns an otherwise difficult measurement of the phase velocity of light into a measurement of angles.

For the symmetric path through a uniform optical prism, with the same external medium at both faces and positive refractive indices,The angles $i,e,r_1,r_2$ are measured from face normals. This is the minimum deviation relation, not a formula for an arbitrary prism orientation. An absolute refractive index additionally requires $n_{\mathrm{ext}}$.

For example, stipulate $A=60^{\circ }$ and $n_{\mathrm{rel}}=3/2$. Then $i=e=\arcsin (3/4)\simeq 48.5904^{\circ }$ and ${\delta }_{\min }\simeq 37.1808^{\circ }$. Substitution recovers $n_{\mathrm{rel}}=1.5$. These synthetic values illustrate the geometry; they are not readings for the prism in the laboratory protocol below.

A Michigan State University teaching experiment uses a mercury lamp, slit, collimator, prism table and optical telescope, with a subsidiary angular scale read to one arcminute. First focus the optical telescope on a distant object; with the prism removed, align its crosshair to a narrow vertical slit image, focus the collimator, and establish the direct-beam zero. Insert and centre the prism. Select the green mercury spectral line, tabulated at $546.1\mathrm{nm}$, then rotate the prism while tracking its image with the optical telescope. Locate the turning point where continued prism rotation reverses the image motion, and read the deviation. Re-establish the minimum separately for each other spectral line. The protocol assumes $A=60^{\circ }$; that assumed apex angle is not an independently measured result. ^[ref]

For an uncertainty-aware implementation, repeat the turning-point search from both prism-rotation directions, recheck the direct-beam reference, and record individual readings before averaging. Independently determine $A$ or include its calibration uncertainty; record the chosen spectral line, sample identity, temperature and surrounding-air conditions. These are proposed controls deduced from the inference, not claimed additional instructions or results of that manual. Finite slit width, unresolved spectral lines, imperfect collimation, table tilt, angular calibration and sample nonuniformity can limit the inferred refractive index. One arcminute readout resolution alone does not establish one arcminute total measurement uncertainty. A single selected wavelength gives one index, not a measured optical dispersion curve.

A short geometric derivation uses $r_1+r_2=A$ and $\delta =i+e-A$. Reversibility exchanges entrance and exit. At the symmetric stationary path, $i=e$ and $r_1=r_2$; applying Snell's law gives the displayed index relation. The plotted calculation checks that this stationary point is a minimum on the chosen transmitting branch. To assess local sensitivity, differentiate the inferred index using angles in radians:This first-order relation exposes both angular contributions; it is not an instruction to add signed systematic errors as independent random errors. In the synthetic example, a deviation error of $+1$ arcminute at fixed $A$ changes the inferred relative refractive index by approximately $+1.92\times 10^{-4}$.

Refraction changes the direction of a transmitted wave when it crosses between media with different phase velocities. For light at a planar interface, Snell's law relates the angles measured from the normal vector through the refractive indices. At normal incidence the direction remains unchanged even though the wavelength and phase velocity can change. The worked example under geometrical optics distinguishes transmission from total internal reflection.

For light, refraction explains why a submerged object looks nearer the surface and why an optical lens can form an image. A wavefront crossing a boundary must retain a consistent wave phase along that boundary: its normal spacing changes with phase velocity, and oblique light rays change direction. Normal incidence separates these two effects especially clearly.

Take stationary, transparent, homogeneous media with isotropy, linearity of their optical response, and real positive refractive indices, at one chosen frequency $f$. With $c$ the vacuum speed of light and ${\lambda }_0=c/f$ the vacuum wavelength, medium $j$ hasThe frequency is unchanged at a stationary boundary; the phase velocity, wavelength and wavenumber can change. Here $n_j$ is a phase refractive index, not the group refractive index. If there is optical dispersion, evaluate $n_j$ at this same frequency on both sides.^[ref]

For an original idealized air–water example, stipulate $n_{\mathrm{a}}=1$ and $n_{\mathrm{w}}=4/3$, with vacuum wavelength $600\mathrm{nm}$. Then $f=c/(600\mathrm{nm})\approx 4.99654\times 10^{14}\mathrm{Hz}$, the water phase velocity is $3c/4$, and its wavelength is $450\mathrm{nm}$. At an air angle of incidence $30^{\circ }$, Snell's law gives a water angle of refraction $\arcsin (3/8)\approx 22.0243^{\circ }$. These stipulated values illustrate the relations; actual refractive indices depend on material conditions and frequency. By reversibility of an optical ray, the same path emerging from water has outgoing air angle $30^{\circ }$.

Let a plane incident wavefront first meet a flat interface at $A$, and let another point $B$ on that front reach $C$ on the interface after $\Delta t$. Its path has length $BC=v_1\Delta t$. The secondary wavelet from $A$ has radius $AD=v_2\Delta t$ in the second medium; the new wavefront through $C$ is tangent to it at $D$. Right triangles with common hypotenuse $AC$ give $\sin {\theta }_1=BC/AC$ and $\sin {\theta }_2=AD/AC$, where both ray angles are measured from the interface normal. Consequently $\sin {\theta }_1/\sin {\theta }_2=v_1/v_2=n_2/n_1$, which is Snell's law. The construction uses phase velocities in homogeneous isotropic media.

The refractive index compares the phase velocity of light in a medium with the vacuum speed of light $c$. For a transparent, uniform medium with isotropy and a positive-index propagation branch,Here $\omega >0$ is the angular frequency, $k>0$ is the wavenumber, and $v_{\mathrm{ph}}=\omega /k$ is the speed of a surface of constant wave phase. The refractive index is a dimensionless quantity; it is a property of a specified material response at a specified frequency, rather than a universal number attached to the word “glass”. More general absorbing or negative-index media require the conventions discussed in refractive index and electromagnetic response. ^[ref]

For an original model example, choose $n=3/2$ at vacuum wavelength ${\lambda }_0=600\mathrm{nm}$. The phase velocity is $v_{\mathrm{ph}}=2c/3\simeq 1.999\times 10^{8}m/s$, the frequency is $f=c/{\lambda }_0\simeq 4.997\times 10^{14}\mathrm{Hz}$, and the medium wavelength is $400\mathrm{nm}$. These are stipulated model values, not measured properties of glass or water. A value at this single frequency does not determine a pulse's group velocity.

The usefulness of refractive index is that one measured response connects several different observations: Snell's law predicts refraction, optical path length predicts accumulated wave phase, and changes with frequency describe optical dispersion. Even at normal incidence, where a light ray does not bend, a changed refractive index changes wavelength and wave phase. The following comparison isolates that effect; the oblique geometry is developed in wavefront.

For a linear stationary interface, phase matching at a planar wave interface preserves frequency: the incident and transmitted electric fields must oscillate together at each boundary point. Their phase velocities can differ, so their wavelengths differ. Writing $\omega =2\pi f$, the definitions giveThis explains the compressed wavefront spacing in the figure without changing the time between crests at the interface. Moving interfaces or time-dependent material responses need not preserve frequency. ^[ref]

The notation $n({\lambda }_0)$ labels refractive index by vacuum wavelength; it does not mean the wavelength inside the material. Dependence on ${\lambda }_0$, equivalently on frequency, is optical dispersion. The field driving the material induces oscillating electric charges; their emitted electromagnetic fields combine with the applied field to change the resulting wave phase. This collective response motivates refractive index, rather than a picture of independently delayed little pieces of light. ^[ref]

To distinguish three speeds, track a wavefront for phase velocity, a narrow wave envelope for group velocity, and the earliest newly introduced disturbance for front velocity. For a transparent differentiable propagation branch,The denominator is the group refractive index. It describes envelope transit when loss and reshaping are small. It need not equal $n$, and neither phase velocity nor a reshaped pulse peak generally measures signal arrival. The front velocity article explains the separate relativistic causality constraint and why a detector threshold is not an exact causal-front measurement.

For a one-dimensional free particle with $m>0$ and $p>0$, take the positive total energy from the relativistic energy-momentum relation:A fixed plane wave quantum phase obeys $kx-\omega t=\text{constant}$. Its phase velocity is thereforeFor a narrow wave packet centered at $p_0$, expand its dispersion relation as $E(p)\simeq E(p_0)+E^{\prime }(p_0)(p-p_0)$. In the Fourier inversion integral building the wave packet, the envelope then depends on $x-E^{\prime }(p_0)t$. Thus its group velocity isThe superluminal phase velocity follows a repeating phase marker; it does not describe a localized signal or superluminal transport of energy. Higher derivatives of the dispersion relation produce wave packet spreading, so the translated-envelope argument is a narrow-band approximation. For $v=0.6c$, the Lorentz factor is $1.25$, $p=0.75mc$ and $E=1.25m{c}^2$: the group velocity is $0.6c$ while the phase velocity is $5c/3$.

The total-energy convention matters. Define $\psi =e^{im{c}^{2}t/\hslash }\Psi$ to remove the common rest energy from a wavefunction $\Psi$ with total-energy time dependence. ThenThis is exactly the free-particle momentum convention used by the Schrödinger equation here. Removing a common time-dependent global phase changes the reported phase velocity, while leaving the de Broglie wavelength, relative spatial quantum phases and group velocity unchanged. Adding $m{c}^2$ again to a total energy would count the rest energy twice.

Transfer of fluctuation energy to particles selected by a wave-particle resonance. For a weakly damped Langmuir wave, particles near its phase velocity absorb net energy from a stable distribution by Landau damping. Under weak random forcing, a smaller damping rate produces a larger stationary wave intensity; a very long waiting time may be required before that stationary balance holds.

A physicist and author of teaching texts on classical mechanics, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics. His treatment of dispersive waves gives a useful example of the texts’ approach: a wave packet is built by adding sinusoidal waves, then expanding its dispersion relation to distinguish group velocity from phase velocity. This explains why the envelope of a water-wave packet can travel at a different speed from its crests.^[ref]

Choose $k,m>0$, $K=(k^2+m^2{)}^{1/2}$ and the positive angular frequency $\omega =Nk/K$. Then the phase velocity is $Nk(k,m)/K^3$ and the group velocity is $N(m^2,-km)/K^3$. Their dot product vanishes and their sum is horizontal with magnitude $N/K$. Draw the group velocity from the tip of the phase velocity: the two form the perpendicular sides of a right triangle. The horizontal hypotenuse is their sum, not the horizontal phase velocity $\omega /k$.

A free top and rigid base impose transverse wavenumbers $(n+1/2)\pi /h$ on guided SH modes between rigid and free planes. Their phase velocity and group velocity are $c={\beta }^{\prime }/\sqrt{1-{\omega }_n^2/{\omega }^2}$ and $U={\beta }^{\prime }\sqrt{1-{\omega }_n^2/{\omega }^2}$ for $\omega >{\omega }_n$. A real Love wave replaces the rigid base by an evanescent elastic load; the approximation becomes reliable sufficiently above the corresponding strong-dispersion transition, not at the actual mode cutoff.

The Yanai wave is the $n=0$ branch of the equatorial shallow-water dispersion relation with positive frequency:Its group velocity is $d\omega /dk=c{\omega }^2/({\omega }^2+\beta c)>0$. At low frequency it has westward phase velocity but transports energy eastward; at high frequency its phase and group velocities approach $c$.

Rüdiger Paschotta develops technical explanations of photonics through the RP Photonics Encyclopedia by Rüdiger Paschotta. Its treatment of refractive index distinguishes the phase velocity of a monochromatic wave from the propagation of a pulse envelope. Because the index depends on frequency, the two velocities generally differ; this dispersion matters when predicting pulse delay and broadening. The explanation connects a material parameter used in optical design with a measurable propagation process.^[ref]