Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 69 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The divergence theorem states . With the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity, this givesor gravitational-acceleration flux .
Use cylindrical radius , so . An arbitrary reference length in the logarithm only adds a constant potential. Off the equatorial plane, the radial part of is . Writing , its angular part is on either open hemisphere. The two cancel: there is no volume density away from .
At the plane, and . Applying the gravitational flux law to a thin pillbox gives . ConsequentlyThis is the Mestel disk potential-density pair. There is no additional point mass at the origin: the enclosed mass tends to zero linearly as the enclosing radius shrinks.
At , up to a constant, so radial circular balance givesOn a sphere of radius , at every nonsingular angular point. Its flux is , and henceDirect integration of the surface density confirms . Thus even though the source is a razor-thin disk. This equality is a special scale-free property of the Mestel disk, not evidence that the source is spherical. In a general disk, matter outside the orbit and nonspherical interior forces prevent this enclosed-mass formula for the local circular speed. The model has infinite total mass, so its potential is defined by differences rather than a zero at infinity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 69 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Adopt the planar Fourier transform conventionExtend the disk potential to three dimensions. The Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity becomesFor , decay away from an isolated disk and continuity across it give . Integration through the plane yields , hence the razor-thin disk Poisson kernelThe given transform of is . The convolution theorem therefore gives the forward potential relationFor the reverse relation, , soInvert the transform to obtain the thin-disk potential-density inversionAn additive constant in is annihilated by . These formulas hold for suitable isolated finite disks, and in a distributional or regularized sense for less regular profiles. The uniform zero-wavenumber sheet needs a separate vertical solution; the infinite Mestel disk requires potential differences or an infrared regularization, since its absolute forward integral diverges.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 69 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For an isolated, virialized three-dimensional Newtonian system with negligible boundary-pressure terms, the virial theorem gives . Hence its total energy is . Defining the kinetic temperature by givesThus losing energy makes the system hotter, while adding energy makes it cooler. This negative heat capacity of a virialized gravitational system uses the inverse-distance potential and the stated boundary assumptions; it is not a dimension-independent consequence of self-gravity.
A gravothermal catastrophe occurs when a stellar core loses heat to its halo through two-body relaxation, contracts and becomes hotter because of its negative heat capacity. The larger temperature gradient then drives more heat outward and accelerates contraction. In the confined three-dimensional isothermal sequence this runaway is associated with loss of a regular thermodynamic equilibrium at a finite total energy. It is different from a fast collisionless instability.
For the rods, use energies and masses per unit axial length, consistently with their logarithmic interaction. DefineIntegrating the two-dimensional Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution gives , with a positive normalization . The proposed potential has , so this requires . Direct differentiation givesConsequently the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity is satisfied precisely byThe free normalization of the velocity distribution can be chosen to give this density. Its enclosed line mass verifies total-mass normalization:At the wall , so the required potential value is also satisfied. This establishes the two-dimensional self-gravitating rod equilibrium, including its field equation, distribution law, mass and boundary condition.
A regular positive solution needs . Since ,The minimum is an infimum of regular equilibrium temperatures. At equality the central logarithm is singular; for , vanishes inside the box. Thus equality is not a regular isothermal rod configuration.
Each of the two velocity components has second moment , so the kinetic energy is . With the given reference potential, the gravitational potential energy is . Using givesThe remaining integral can be evaluated explicitly:Adding therefore yieldsNow , and . The energy-temperature curve of a two-dimensional self-gravitating rod gas is consequentlyAt fixed box area, differentiation givesTo establish its sign rather than infer it from a plot, expand the logarithm for :The series and its derivative converge locally uniformly in . Moreover as and as . Thus every finite energy on this mean-field isothermal sequence has a unique regular equilibrium temperature, and there is no finite-energy termination or turning point. The central density diverges only in the infinite-negative-energy limit.
There is no finite-energy gravothermal catastrophe in this two-dimensional rod model. Its logarithmic interaction gives a different caloric curve from the three-dimensional inverse-distance problem. This microcanonical conclusion does not prohibit a distinct fixed-temperature collapse: in the canonical ensemble, a bath at or below admits no regular equilibrium of this family.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 54 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The strong equivalence principle asserts universality of free fall even for bodies with gravitational self-binding, together with independence of local experimental outcomes, including gravitational experiments, from the location and velocity of a freely falling laboratory. “Local” means that external tidal variation across the apparatus can be neglected. It does not mean that all curvature, or a laboratory's own gravitational field, can be removed. The weak principle concerns freely falling test bodies without appreciable self-gravity; laboratory composition tests alone therefore do not establish the strong version.
Lunar laser ranging supplies evidence specifically sensitive to the strong version. The Earth and Moon have different fractions of gravitational self-energy. If those fractions affected gravitational and inertial mass differently, their accelerations toward the Sun would differ and the lunar orbit would acquire a periodically varying polarization, the Nordtvedt effect. Combining lunar ranging with laboratory bounds on composition-dependent differential acceleration separates this self-energy effect. A determination available before this examination found the self-energy contribution to the Earth–Moon difference in to be , consistent with zero; see the 2004 experimental analysis. Universality-of-free-fall experiments, gravitational redshift measurements and tests of local Lorentz invariance support the weaker constituent principles, but should not be confused with a direct self-gravity test.
In general relativity, all matter couples to one metric tensor, and freely falling test particles follow its geodesics. At any event, Riemann normal coordinates give and . Nongravitational local equations reduce to their special-relativistic forms in that frame. Gravitational binding is governed by the same metric field equations rather than a separate composition-dependent force, and the local gravitational coupling is universal. These features implement the strong equivalence principle. Curvature still governs geodesic deviation, so this construction removes uniform acceleration, not tidal gravity.
To geometrize Newtonian mechanics, use a four-dimensional manifold with coordinates , absolute time and a degenerate spatial inverse metric , . For a gravitational potential define the torsion-free Newton–Cartan gravitational connection byIt satisfies and . An affine geodesic has ; choosing makes its spatial equationsThis is Newton's free-fall law. The geometry is Newton–Cartan theory, with an affine connection and degenerate metric data, rather than a nondegenerate four-dimensional Lorentzian metric. The spatial slices themselves remain Euclidean.
Use the curvature conventionIn these coordinates the quadratic connection terms vanish, and the only nonzero curvature components, apart from antisymmetry in , areIn particular and all other components of the Ricci tensor vanish. This Newtonian tidal curvature gives relative acceleration . Spatially constant gravitational acceleration can be removed by an accelerating frame because its Hessian vanishes. The Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity becomes . Fluid mechanics is compatible with the same connection: the covariant continuity equation is the usual mass-conservation equation, and the spatial Euler equation is , which includes the gravitational force through the connection.
Now replace this absolute-time geometry by the Lorentzian metric of general relativity, with signature . A perfect fluid haswhere is rest-frame energy density. In units , for a nonrelativistic fluid. The Newtonian equation suggests a covariant curvature equation sourced by . However alone conflicts with generic stress-energy conservation, because the contracted Bianchi identity gives . Among expressions linear in Ricci curvature, conservation therefore selectsA constant multiple of the metric is also divergence-free, giving the possible cosmological constant term. This is a heuristic selection using locality, universal metric coupling and second-order metric equations; Newtonian matching by itself does not prove uniqueness among every possible gravity theory.
To fix the coefficient, first set the cosmological constant to zero. The trace-reversed equation would read . In the fluid rest frame, , so . In the weak static Newtonian limit, and . For negligible pressure the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity then requires . Restoring uses , and , giving . ThusPressure contributes to relativistic active gravity, while the low-pressure weak-field limit recovers Newton's Poisson equation. The comparison fixes the Newtonian normalization but does not fix , which is an independent parameter.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 65 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use a steady, isotropic, self-gravitating dark matter halo, with its constant one-dimensional velocity dispersion. The Spherical Jeans equation and spherical mass conservation readFor the scale-free outer region, put . Its enclosed mass scales as , so is constant only if ; the Spherical Jeans equation then gives . Thus the singular isothermal sphere hasIts circular speed is . If a speed denoted were instead the circular speed, the coefficient would be , but the printed variable is a velocity dispersion.
The assumptions matter. A constant velocity dispersion and spherical shape alone do not specify a unique central mass density or orbital distribution. Even with isotropy, the Spherical Jeans equation integrates to , and the self-gravitating Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity givesThere are finite-central-density isothermal solutions as well as the singular one; the expression is the intended outer scale-free halo approximation. A finite halo must also end or steepen at large radius, since the untruncated singular isothermal sphere has infinite total mass.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ia Paper 3 12C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a spherically symmetric potential, the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity becomesIntegrate from the center, excluding any additional point mass there. The boundary condition is as , soThis derives the enclosed-mass form of the spherical shell theorem from the differential equation. Outside the mass, integrating gives ; the conventional zero at infinity sets .
For the dyadic shells, multiply their constant mass density by their spherical volumes. The th shell contributesSumming the geometric series yieldsAt radius , the enclosed shells are exactly those with ; a boundary itself contributes no mass. ThusDividing by givesThese dyadic spherical shells with inverse-radius density scaling have the same field magnitude at each shell boundary, although the field varies inside an individual shell. Finally, outside the planet,with zero potential at infinity; without that convention an arbitrary additive constant remains.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 60 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Assume a steady, locally plane-symmetric galactic disk, with negligible radial tilt term in the vertical Jeans equation. Write for the stellar mass density, and for the upward gradient of the Newtonian gravitational potential; the actual vertical gravitational acceleration is . Constant vertical velocity dispersion givesIntegrating the plane-parallel Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity from the symmetry plane gives . Outside most of the mass, this tends to for , where the surface density includes both sides of the galactic disk. Treating this field as constant and integrating the vertical Jeans equation yieldsThis exponential is the thin-sheet approximation or the outer tail, not the exact profile at every height. To see the distinction without an additional assumption, set with . The Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity becomes , with , and is solved bySince , the exact self-gravitating isothermal slab has . At large , , recovering precisely the boxed scale height; near the plane its slope vanishes, whereas an exponential has a cusp.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 60 1 iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Measure the number-density profile and vertical velocity dispersion of a tracer stellar population. The vertical Jeans equation estimates the restoring field fromThe second term accounts for the tilt of the velocity ellipsoid; an exponential tracer with constant velocity dispersion and negligible tilt gives above the plane. The tracer need not supply all the gravitating mass. To infer the dynamical surface density from vertical stellar motions, integrate the axisymmetric Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity:For a nearly flat galaxy rotation curve with a small radial correction, this reduces to . Estimate stellar surface density independently from counts, the initial mass function and faint objects, and add the gas surface density and stellar remnants. The residuallimits the allowed unseen material within the same height interval. A fitted dark matter halo contributes too: measurements at several heights help distinguish its extended density from a thin dark component in the galactic disk. Under a specified decomposition, the disc dark-matter fraction is the inferred dark-disc surface density divided by the total disc surface density, with uncertainty or an upper limit if the residual is consistent with zero. Selection effects, disequilibrium, the tilt term and uncertain baryonic counts must enter the error budget; an excess alone does not establish that all of it is in the galactic disk.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 59 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put , take without loss of generality, and write . The Newtonian gravitational potential is singular at the origin; all pointwise claims below concern . The zero of the Newtonian gravitational potential is the one in the paper, with an implicit fixed length unit inside the logarithm.
The Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity in cylindrical coordinates givesThe two contributions to the Laplacian areConsequently the mass density of the axisymmetric logarithmic gravitational potential isThe coefficient of is positive. The coefficient of determines the density positivity for an axisymmetric logarithmic potential: strict positivity at every noncentral point requires and . Nonnegativity permits , where the mass density vanishes on the noncentral symmetry axis. For it is negative near that axis. Either sign of a nonzero real gives the same model, and is undefined. Setting yields vacuum away from the singular origin, not strictly positive mass density. The central cusp is locally integrable and contains no hidden point mass: the Newtonian gravitational field flux through a shrinking sphere is of order its radius.
An equatorial circular orbit requires inward gravitational acceleration equal to . Thus the circular speed isThis is a flat galaxy rotation curve. The singular center does not define an additional circular orbit at .
The specific orbital energy is conserved because the Newtonian gravitational potential is time independent. The axial specific angular momentum is conserved because the Newtonian gravitational potential is axisymmetric. Hence the Jeans theorem, or directly in the Collisionless Boltzmann equation, permits a stationary two-integral galactic distribution function. Using makes this galactic distribution function even under reversal of the azimuthal velocity, so it describes a nonstreaming population. A general axisymmetric population can have an odd part in , or dependence on a third integral of motion; neither is required for this construction.
At each position define . The two-integral galactic distribution function is invariant under swapping and , since only their sum of squares occurs in . It is also even in each velocity component. Swapping integration variables proves meridional velocity isotropy of a two-integral distribution, while reflecting one variable makes each mixed integrand odd. ThereforeAll mean velocities vanish, so these are also the corresponding statements for the velocity ellipsoid and its centered covariance tensor. They do not require to equal either meridional second moment.
To normalize the proposed logarithmic-potential two-integral distribution, first separate the mass density into terms with the same spatial factors as the two exponentials:Since and , the Gaussian integral and its derivative giveThus velocity integration of the galactic distribution function yields . Matching the independent spatial factors determinesThis verifies both the stationary Collisionless Boltzmann equation and the required Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. A shift changes the normalizations to and ; the physical mass density is unchanged.
There is an important distinction between positive mass density and a nonnegative galactic distribution function. For , both coefficients above are nonnegative. For a prolate model , and one must test the sum rather than reject the model just because one term is negative. On accessible phase space,with equality in the equatorial plane at , . The nonnegativity bound for a prolate logarithmic-potential distribution is consequentlyFor larger , the displayed algebraic expression still integrates to the positive mass density, but is negative at those equatorial circular orbit phase points and is not a physical galactic distribution function. This extra restriction is distinct from the earlier density-only answer.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 59 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For an axisymmetric Newtonian gravitational potential, the vacuum Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates is . Use separation of variables, . Dividing by and setting the separated constant to , with , givesThe first equation has solutions ; with , the second is the order-zero Bessel differential equation. Regularity at the axis selects the Bessel function of the first kind , rather than the singular Bessel function of the second kind . ThusThere are also zero-separation-constant modes, and other boundary conditions can select other separated families. For a localized reflection-symmetric thin disk, decay away from the disk selects on the respective half-spaces.
Apply the divergence theorem to the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity across a narrow pillbox enclosing disk area. Writing the volume mass density as givesReflection symmetry makes . A superposition of the regular vacuum modes therefore satisfiesThe order-zero Hankel transform and its inversion now determine the Hankel representation of thin-disk gravity:The sign is fixed by the positive derivative of an attractive Newtonian gravitational potential above the disk. For ordinary finite disks the representation uses the isolated boundary condition, fixing any extra vacuum field or additive constant. Infinite scale-free disks require suitable regularization of the potential itself.
Equatorial circular orbit balance is . Using in the Hankel representation of thin-disk gravity givesDifferentiation under the integral is justified by convergence for regular models, or by first working off the disk and taking the limiting radial field.
Write . For the Mestel disk, the supplied Bessel function integral gives for . The circular speed is thenMeanwhile the interior mass is . ConsequentlyThe Mestel disk has a flat galaxy rotation curve, despite its nonspherical geometry.
Its infinite total mass prevents setting the Newtonian gravitational potential to zero at infinity. Indeed the integral for diverges at because . Subtracting the potential at a reference point removes this additive divergence. As an explicit check, the Mestel disk potential-density pair isIt is harmonic for , its vertical derivative jump is , and . Equivalently, an Abel regularization of an oscillatory integral with damping factor in the radial-field integral gives , which tends to one as . The force is well-defined although the unreferenced potential is not.
The equality with is special to the Mestel disk, not a thin-disk shell theorem. The spherical shell theorem normally makes that formula possible, but does not apply to an astrophysical disk. Exterior annuli exert outward radial gravitational acceleration inside their radii, while interior annuli do not act exactly as point masses at the origin. For this particular scale-free surface density, their combined contributions happen to produce the same result as the interior mass expression. Changing the radial surface density or truncating the disk generally destroys the equality: enclosed mass does not determine a disc rotation curve.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 54 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The magnetic field satisfies . Expanding the divergence of its Maxwell stress tensor givesFor the Newtonian gravitational field , Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity gives , and the gradient representation gives . ConsequentlyThe negative of the Newtonian gravitational stress tensor, in this force-stress convention, therefore supplies . Adding the pressure stress supplies , soEach summand is symmetric. Absence of external gravitational sources is needed to represent the full gravitational force by this self-gravitating stress.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 54 2 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Integrate Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity through a narrow slab around the disk. The horizontal derivative contributions vanish as its thickness tends to zero, leaving the normal-derivative jumpThe even function symmetry of makes the derivatives opposite, soIn the current-free simply connected upper half-space, Ampère's circuital law gives and permits a magnetic scalar potential. Rescale it so that . The divergence-free condition makes satisfy Laplace's equation, withCompare with the gravitational jump condition. Subject to the same isolated-field boundary condition at infinity, is the harmonic potential of the effective surface densityThis gravity-equivalent magnetic surface density can have either sign; it is a mathematical representation of the exterior magnetic field, not physical negative mass. An imposed nondecaying field would require additional boundary data and would not be fixed by the disk surface density alone.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 58 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Write for the genuine surface density of a disk, and for its three-dimensional mass density. The delta function in the printed surface density formula belongs to , not to . Introduce a reference length to make logarithms dimensionless. The intended model is the infinite, self-gravitating, scale-free Mestel disk, with no extra source or imposed gravitational field.
The circular speed satisfies . Thus the flat galaxy rotation curve givesA reflection-symmetric harmonic function with this midplane boundary value isVerify this continuation using the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. For , set ; thenHence off the astrophysical disk, and reflection gives the lower-half-space solution. Across the astrophysical disk the derivative jumps by . The distributional Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity therefore givesAt the origin the enclosed disk mass tends to zero linearly with radius, so there is no additional central point mass. This verifies the Mestel disk potential-density pair. The astrophysical disk has infinite total mass and a logarithmic Newtonian gravitational potential, so it is not an isolated finite-mass model with Newtonian gravitational potential zero at infinity. The usual scale-free boundary condition is important: the midplane rotation curve alone would also permit an added term , representing an extra uniform sheet without changing the radial circular force. That contribution is excluded in the intended Mestel disk model.
Use a mass-weighted planar galactic distribution function, so is the stellar mass in a small planar phase space element. A number-weighted function instead needs the stellar mass factor when computing . Assume a steady collisionless stellar system and isotropy in the two in-plane velocity components. Put and write . The stationary Collisionless Boltzmann equation becomesSince this holds in every velocity direction, . In coordinates with , this is exactly . Therefore the planar isotropic distribution is , where is the specific orbital energy. Stationarity is essential; instantaneous isotropy alone would not imply this result.
Integrating over the two-dimensional velocity plane gives the planar isotropic distribution inversion:On the astrophysical disk , so . Differentiate the integral with respect to its lower limit:The boundary value as verifies the integrated equation as well as its derivative. Choosing the implicit length unit recovers the printed normalization. Changing the additive energy zero changes this prefactor accordingly.
At a fixed radius, the normalized velocity density isIt is a product of centered Gaussian distributions. Differentiating the supplied Gaussian integral with respect to its coefficient gives the second moments, and odd moments vanish. Thus the in-plane velocity dispersions areAn exactly planar astrophysical disk has and . The nonzero circular speed is a property of the force field, not a statement that this hot stellar distribution has net rotation.
Reversing every retrograde star folds the azimuthal Gaussian to a half-normal distribution. Equivalently the new steady galactic distribution function is , because and are integrals of the motion. Its density and even velocity moments are unchanged. Its streaming velocity isThis maximally prograde stellar distribution still has radial motion and a spread of azimuthal speeds; it does not place every star on a circular orbit. In particular while . The mean speed is smaller than the root-mean-square speed , which explains why it is not the circular speed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 58 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use a local, homogeneous razor-thin disk approximation in a frame rotating with constant . The unperturbed planar velocity is zero in this frame, and the large-scale gravitational and centrifugal forces balance. Neglect viscosity, magnetic fields, thickness and background gradients across a wavelength. Take small planar disturbances, with wavelength short compared with the galaxy's background scale but long enough for a fluid description. The barotropic closure of a razor-thin disk is , with fixed and a positive derivativeSolid-body rotation has no shear and has radial epicyclic frequency . By rotational symmetry of the local model choose a wavevector along , and write perturbations proportional to .
Let be the surface density, -velocity, -velocity and Newtonian gravitational potential amplitudes. The linearized continuity equation and Euler equations with the Coriolis force areThe perturbing Newtonian gravitational potential solves the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravityIts decaying solution is proportional to . The jump in its derivative is , giving the razor-thin disk Poisson kernelEliminating from the two momentum equations, and using , gives the density-wave branchThe complete linear system also has a zero-frequency balanced mode; it is not the growing density-wave branch, and division by in this elimination excludes it. The result is the uniformly rotating gas-sheet dispersion relation: pressure opposes compression at large wavenumber, self-gravity promotes compression, and rotation provides epicyclic support.
A mode is exponentially unstable when . With and , this occurs atThe uniform perturbation is marginal rather than growing in this local calculation. With , rotation fails to stabilize sufficiently short waves:These limits show why both pressure and rotation are needed for stability at all wavelengths.
For nonzero pressure and rotation, put . Complete the square:Its minimum lies at . Thus a growing mode exists precisely whenThe printed inequality has the opposite physical meaning: it is the condition for no exponentially growing density wave. Equality is marginal. In the usual gas Toomre stability criterion, , so instability is and stability is . The unstable wavenumber band of a rotating gas sheet iswhen .
If and remain fixed while decreases slowly, first reach marginality atThe first wavelength to become unstable just below this threshold is the marginal fragmentation wavelength of a rotating sheet:Density maxima are separated by approximately this wavelength. The expected fragment size is of this order; an overdense half-wave has width about . Linear theory fixes a preferred wavelength, not an exact nonlinear clump radius or shape. Further cooling shifts the fastest-growing wavelength to . A rough fragment mass is consequently of order , with a geometrical factor depending on the nonlinear fragmentation pattern.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 58 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Take a static, nonrotating, nonmagnetic spherical equilibrium with and . Use a fluid displacement . Write for Eulerian fluid perturbations. The Lagrangian pressure perturbation and corresponding mass density change obey , . Linearizing mass conservation, the Euler equations for an inviscid fluid and Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity givesThere is no equilibrium acceleration to multiply a perturbed mass density. The adiabatic process condition, with composition carried by the parcel, closes the system:These are the complete linear adiabatic stellar oscillation equations, including the perturbation of self-gravity. Neglect of heat exchange is appropriate when oscillation periods are short compared with relevant thermal relaxation times; it does not determine nonadiabatic excitation or damping.
For the pressure and buoyancy modes, separate angular dependence using spherical harmonics:The horizontal amplitude has dimensions of length. Angular differentiation gives , and tangential momentum gives . Define the adiabatic sound speed, stellar buoyancy frequency and Lamb frequency byThe adiabatic mass density relation becomes . Substitution produces a radial form of the full oscillation equations for nonzero :The apparent factor is evaluated through its defining gradient at the centre rather than by dividing two zeros.
Regularity at the centre excludes singular solutions. At a free surface the Lagrangian pressure perturbation vanishes, ; outside the star the gravitational perturbation decays as . For a model with mass density tending to zero at its surface, continuity of and its radial derivative gives . If the equilibrium mass density jumps to vacuum, include the displaced-surface mass sheet: the outward-minus-inward derivative jump is , so the interior condition is . An atmospheric boundary condition can replace the ideal free surface.
These conditions make an eigenvalue, not an arbitrary local sound frequency. With conservative boundary conditions the adiabatic operator is self-adjoint, giving real ; negative values describe instability. The frequencies depend on , self-gravity, stratification and boundaries, as well as angular degree and radial order. In a spherical nonrotating star they are degenerate in . For homologous equilibrium structures, their scale isthus the typical oscillation time measures inverse square root of mean mass density, while individual frequencies probe the interior adiabatic sound speed and stellar buoyancy frequency profiles.
For radial modes, write . Eliminating the pressure and gravitational perturbations gives the radial stellar pulsation equationThis is a Sturm-Liouville problem. Multiplication by and integration, with vanishing boundary terms, gives its Rayleigh quotientFor constant , makes both numerator contributions nonnegative. At , a homologous displacement is neutral; for constant the same trial displacement makes the quotient negative. For the uniform-density stellar model, constant is an exact mode and . With varying , the integral criterion, rather than a universal pointwise threshold, controls radial stability.
The Cowling approximation neglects while retaining the equilibrium gravitational field. It is useful for short-wavelength modes, but is not needed for the full derivation above. In a locally slowly varying region, take both remaining amplitudes proportional to and retain the leading derivative terms. ThenEliminating either amplitude gives the acoustic-gravity propagation relationPositive is oscillatory propagation; negative means an evanescent wave. The high-frequency branch, , describes stellar acoustic modes, restored chiefly by compressibility and pressure. At frequencies well above , this gives . The low-frequency propagating branch in stable stratification, , instead describes stellar gravity modes, restored by buoyancy. At there is no such nonradial gravity-wave cavity.
A stellar acoustic mode is trapped between an inner turning point near and an outer reflecting region. Low- modes penetrate deeply; radial modes reach the centre. Higher-degree modes turn farther out. Standing waves require the WKB quantization conditionwhere the phase depends on the central or turning-point behaviour and surface reflection. For high radial order and small degree, the leading acoustic travel-time result is the large frequency separationThe term is the leading central angular phase shift; smaller frequency separations depend on detailed interior gradients. The near-surface mass density stratification sets the acoustic cutoff frequency. In a plane-parallel isothermal atmosphere with mass density scale height , . Modes below this cutoff can reflect and form a cavity; waves sufficiently above it escape and need an outgoing-wave boundary condition. Nonadiabatic damping, driving and rotation alter real-star mode properties, but the adiabatic frequency problem isolates their dependence on the equilibrium structure.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 62 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A phase-space distribution function describes the mass in a small cell of positions and velocities: is that mass. Its velocity integral is the spatial mass density, and at a fixed position is a normalized velocity probability density. A number-normalized galactic distribution function differs by the stellar mass convention.
Take and . For the cusped logarithmic spherical galaxy model, differentiate the gravitational potential and use the spherical Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity:ThusA circular orbit requires . Its galaxy rotation curve is thereforeIt rises as at small radius and approaches from below at large radius.
The outer flat galaxy rotation curve is qualitatively useful for galaxies. However, the density has an inner cusp and an outer tail, while diverges. The model therefore requires an outer truncation for a finite galaxy, and does not describe a central constant-density core. Its gravitational potential cannot be normalized to zero at infinity.
For a star, the specific energy is and the specific angular momentum is . Since the gravitational potential is stationary and spherical,Thus both the specific energy and the entire angular-momentum vector are conserved.
For Jeans theorem, follow a stellar trajectory in phase space. The Collisionless Boltzmann equation is preciselyIn a steady system , so the value of the galactic distribution function is constant along every trajectory: it is itself an integral of motion. Conversely, if are time-independent integrals of motion, then satisfies . Locally, a complete set of invariant orbit labels expresses any steady galactic distribution function this way. This is the weak form of Jeans theorem; a stronger assertion about a small set of isolating integrals needs additional orbital regularity or mixing assumptions. In particular, the theorem does not say that every steady galaxy must have a galactic distribution function depending on only and .
For the proposed constant-anisotropy distribution function, write and . Introduce a polar angle in the tangential velocity plane. Then , so the apparent singularity cancels against the velocity Jacobian. This inverse-angular-momentum velocity integration makes the density finite for every .
Let , , , and . Each exponential component contributesHere the two Gaussian integrals and the angular integral have product . Consequently,The galactic distribution function is nonnegative, gives the required density, and depends on conserved ; by Jeans theorem it is a self-consistent steady solution.
Differentiating the Gaussian integral with respect to shows that each component has , and the same value for . Angular averaging gives . Weighting these by yields the velocity dispersionsThe radial numerator includes , as in the original PDF. All mean velocities vanish by parity. The same parity, or the zero angular average of , gives .
The velocity-anisotropy parameter isThe constant-anisotropy distribution function therefore favors radial motion at every radius: the radial variance is twice either individual tangential variance. It still has a substantial population with nonzero angular momentum, rather than exclusively radial orbits. The factor enhances low-angular-momentum stars. The radial velocity dispersion approaches at the centre and far out; each individual tangential variance is half as large. There is no mean rotation, despite the well-defined galaxy rotation curve for hypothetical circular orbits.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 64 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For nonzero real wavenumber , seek a Fourier mode of the Newtonian gravitational potential in the form . Away from the razor-thin sheet, the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity becomes . Requiring the perturbation to decay on both sides and remain continuous gives .
Integrating the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity through fixes the derivative jump:Thus the perturbing gravitational potential isAt the midplane this reduces to the razor-thin disk Poisson kernel. The observable real disturbance is the real part. Writing the perturbation amplitude as instead of gives the same formula with ; linearity makes it independent of the background density. The disturbance is a uniformly changed sheet and has potential proportional to , rather than a decaying nonzero-wavenumber solution.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 64 2 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
First eliminate the density-dependent definition of the auxiliary . The Newtonian gravitational stress tensor can be written without derivatives of its normalization:Here is the Kronecker delta, and repeated indices are summed. Differentiating givesThe first and third terms cancel because mixed partial derivatives commute; the final step uses the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. Therefore the gravitational force density is a stress divergence:The identity holds for spatially varying mass density: substituting the definition of before differentiating prevents erroneous extra density-gradient terms.
For the gravitational stress contribution to angular-momentum transport, the anisotropic term supplies angular momentum transport. In cylindrical components its radial–azimuthal entry isIn the momentum conservation equation, is the radial stress contribution to the angular-momentum flux, whose sign depends on the correlated radial and azimuthal field components. It vanishes for a perfectly axisymmetric potential but can be nonzero for spiral disturbances.
The other term is isotropic and acts as an effective negative pressure, . Its force contribution is , modifying normal compression and force balance. It has no off-diagonal shear component and therefore no direct radial angular momentum transport. In an axisymmetric averaged disk it supplies no azimuthal torque. The complete symmetric Newtonian gravitational stress tensor also expresses conservation of angular momentum without an internal couple.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 320 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Assume a time-independent spherical relative potential , with acceleration . The relative energy and specific angular momentum areAlong an orbit, and , since a spherical gradient is radial. Thus both and are integrals of motion. Choose the escape level and take the bound galactic distribution function to vanish for .
For an isotropic , integrate over a spherical coordinate system in velocity space:Differentiating gives . Convolve once more with the reciprocal-square-root kernel. Reversing the order of integration, under the usual integrability assumptions, usesTherefore . Differentiating proves Eddington inversion:Here is outside the square root, as in the original PDF; the TeX transcription wrongly places it inside. The assumptions include a locally integrable bound distribution and sufficient density regularity, with no extra unbound or boundary population. An inverted expression must additionally be nonnegative to be physical. Since the velocity measure and are invariant under all velocity rotations, whenever these moments exist; mixed moments vanish.
For the half-anisotropic distribution function, write the polar velocity angle from the radial direction as . Then , andThe apparent singularity is integrable because it cancels the factor in the velocity measure. Integrating and givesThe density relation requires at the escape boundary and for a physical distribution. Consider a monotonically decreasing . The largest allowed radius at fixed binding energy is the radial-orbit limit with ; a nonzero- orbit normally has a smaller apocenter because of its centrifugal term. Changing from to givesThe numerator in the original PDF instead uses . That is a genuine printed error: the chain rule for requires . It is not legitimate to prove the printed expression as written. A concrete counterexample is the unit-parameter Hernquist model at : , and . The printed quotient is , whereas the correct is . The former would give a negative distribution.
The angular weight after cancellation is uniform in , so the averages of and are both . The azimuthal angle splits the tangential term equally. Hence and each individual tangential moment is half the radial one. The velocity-anisotropy parameter is consequentlyThis is a radially biased constant-anisotropy distribution function, not an isotropic one or purely radial motion. It does not by itself prove dynamical stability; it preferentially weights small angular momentum while remaining integrable.
For the Hernquist model, use the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity with the relative-potential sign, . Since ,Its enclosed mass is , which tends to . Expressing the augmented density in the relative potential gives . The preceding derivative therefore giveswith zero bound-model population outside the allowed energy domain. It is nonnegative and reproduces the density by direct integration. The Hernquist model has a central density cusp, so the formulas for the local distribution are interpreted at . As a further check, the radial second moment obtained from the same integral is and each tangential second moment is , consistent with .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 320 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
On a length scale , pressure communicates support over a sound-crossing time , whereas self-gravity acts over a time of order . When the former is longer, gravity can amplify an overdensity before pressure smooths it. Thus Jeans instability occurs at scales of order ; the precise numerical factor depends on whether scale means wavelength or inverse wavenumber.
Take a uniform static background, small perturbations, an inviscid barotropic fluid, and with . An infinite Newtonian homogeneous density cannot itself have zero background gravitational acceleration while satisfying the unmodified Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. Specify the Jeans swindle: subtract the homogeneous field, or regard an external prescription as balancing it, and apply Poisson's equation only to perturbations. The linearized continuity equation and Euler equations for an inviscid fluid areTaking a time derivative of the first equation and substituting the second yields . A plane wave therefore givesFor there is exponential growth at rate . At the density mode is neutral to this linear order, and above it there are acoustic oscillations. The critical wavelength is . Transverse velocity perturbations decouple as zero-frequency vortical modes in this idealization.
For the attractive Yukawa potential, assume a real screening parameter . Its Green function obeys , including the delta source. Thus . The same fluid elimination gives Jeans instability with Yukawa gravity:There exists a growing nonzero-wavenumber mode precisely whenEquality gives no exponentially growing nonzero mode. If screening exceeds this threshold, the finite-range gravitational response is too weak to overcome pressure at any wavelength. Otherwise all sufficiently long but nonconstant waves remain unstable, with a longer minimum unstable wavelength than in Newtonian gravity. For the long-wave gravitational contribution also scales as , so the growth rate tends to zero as ; screening does not produce a second positive lower cutoff in wavenumber. A homogeneous screened background can have the constant gravitational potential , with zero force, so no Newtonian background subtraction is needed for nonzero screening. The limits and are nonuniform. An exact density change is not one of the growing finite-wavelength modes. In the pressureless edge case , every finite is unstable for positive density and finite screening.

