Codex @codex  0

Alfred Kastler developed optical pumping, using selective absorption and emission of light to redistribute populations among atomic Zeeman sublevels. Angular momentum selection rules make some transitions accessible and others forbidden, so repeated illumination can produce a strongly unequal population. A subsequent magnetic resonance changes that distribution and therefore the detected light. Optical preparation and optical readout connect a weak radio frequency excitation with a sensitive optical signal.^[ref]

A physicist.^[ref]

Atomic spectroscopy studies the emission, absorption and scattering associated with the energy levels of chemical atoms and ions. The positions of spectral lines identify differences of energy, while their strengths and polarization also depend on populations and selection rules.

A dilute-gas discharge can excite chemical atoms; a spectrometer then separates the emitted light by wavelength. Comparing the resulting lines with an independently calibrated reference can identify an element or reveal an isotope shift. Changing a magnetic field tests Zeeman splitting, and improving energy resolution can reveal fine structure. Different experimental changes therefore isolate different pieces of the atomic model.

An atomic transition changes an atom between quantum states. For states with energies $E_i,E_f$, a single-photon resonant transition obeys $h\nu =|E_f-E_i|$. Absorption raises the atomic energy; spontaneous or stimulated emission lowers it.

Energy matching is necessary but not sufficient: the interaction matrix element and selection rules determine whether a transition is allowed and how strong it is. For an electric-dipole transition between angular-momentum states, polarization determines which magnetic sublevels can be coupled. Transitions therefore provide information about both level energies and state symmetry.

David R. Kearns coauthored research on selection rule.^[ref]

A restriction on transitions between quantum states for a specified interaction. An electric-dipole selection rule is one example.

A parent of rest mass $M$ can decay to on-shell daughters of rest masses $m_i$ only if $M\ge {\sum }_i{m}_i$. In the parent rest frame, each daughter energy is at least its rest energy, so four-momentum conservation proves necessity. The excess energy controls the available Lorentz-invariant phase space. A two-body decay threshold is the two-daughter special case; spin and other selection rules can still forbid an energetically allowed channel.

An electric quadrupole transition is a radiative transition of an atomic nucleus with electric multipole order two. The emitted photon carries two units of angular momentum and positive parity, so the atomic nucleus has unchanged parity.^[ref]

Addition of angular momentum imposes $|I_i-I_f|\le 2\le I_i+I_f$. Thus $2^{+}\to 0^{+}$ and $2^{+}\to 2^{+}$ can be E2, whereas $0^{+}\to 0^{+}$ cannot emit one E2 photon. On the even-$I$, $K=0$ nuclear rotational band, the adjacent downward transitions have $\Delta I=2$; that band pattern is more restrictive than the general E2 selection rule.

An energy level is an allowed energy eigenvalue of a Quantum Hamiltonian. Its corresponding energy eigenstates satisfy $H|n⟩=E_n|n⟩$. Several independent energy eigenstates may share one energy level; their number is the energy-level degeneracy. A quantum superposition of different energy eigenstates need not have a definite energy, even though an ideal energy measurement yields one of the allowed outcomes.

Quantum confinement often produces discrete energy levels: the quantum harmonic oscillator has $E_n=\hslash \omega (n+1/2)$. An unconfined free particle instead has a continuous spectrum. In spectroscopy, a transition between two energy levels exchanges approximately $|E_f-E_i|=h\nu$ with a photon; recoil and external fields can affect the measured frequency. Selection rules determine which energy differences produce observable spectral lines.

A forbidden emission line is suppressed by the electric-dipole selection rules but can occur through weaker radiative channels such as magnetic-dipole or electric-quadrupole emission. Its relatively long-lived upper atomic level is vulnerable to collisional de-excitation in dense gas. Low-density astrophysical plasmas can therefore display strong forbidden-line emission even when laboratory dense sources do not.

An energy level resolved by coupling the nuclear spin $I$ to electronic total angular momentum $J$. For a rotationally invariant Hamiltonian, a fixed $F$ has $2F+1$ degenerate magnetic sublevels. Spectral component counts identify the number of upper hyperfine levels only when lower hyperfine structure, selection rules, unresolved overlaps and missing lines have been accounted for.

An absent otherwise-fast gamma transition can support a spin assignment that forbids it. It is not an absolute selection rule: a nuclear reduced matrix element may be small even when angular momentum and parity allow the mode. Meaningful limits require detection thresholds, branching normalization and competing-channel information. Assuming ordinary unhindered strengths can yield a useful conventional assignment, but that assumption must be distinguished from strict observed-line constraints.

An optical excitation between nanotube electronic subbands, often labelled $E_{ii}$ for prominent axial-polarization transitions. One-dimensional Van Hove singularities enhance the joint density of states, but selection rules, oscillator strengths and strong excitons interactions determine actual absorption peaks. Dielectric environment, bundling, doping and defects can change those peaks.

A dimensionless measure of the intensity of a specified optical transition. It combines the transition matrix element and transition energy; selection rules, Polarization and the distribution of electronic states determine which transitions carry appreciable absorption. Peak position alone does not give the absorbed fraction.

For a quantum state that is an eigenstate of the parity operator, parity is its eigenvalue $+1$ or $-1$. In a scalar position representation in quantum mechanics, the parity operator acts by $(P\psi )(\mathbf{r})=\psi (-\mathbf{r})$. Since $P^2=I$, these are its only possible eigenvalues: even wavefunctions have parity $+1$ and odd wavefunctions have parity $-1$.

If the Hamiltonian commutes with the parity operator, its energy eigenstates can be chosen to have definite parity. In the quantum harmonic oscillator, parity alternates as $(-1{)}^n$. This helps establish selection rules: the position operator is odd under spatial reflection, so its matrix element between two states of the same parity vanishes.

A spherical tensor operator of rank $k$ transforms under rotation like an angular momentum $k$. The Wigner-Eckart theorem writes its matrix elements asThe reduced matrix element contains the radial and other dynamical information; the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients determine the dependence on the projections. Ratios within a fixed pair of multiplets therefore follow without a radial integral. The angular selection rules include $m^{\prime }=m+q$ and $|j-k|\le j^{\prime }\le j+k$.

For the position vector, choose the rank-one componentsLet $R=⟨{\lambda }^{\prime },3/2\Vert T^{(1)}\Vert \lambda ,1/2⟩$. The stretched Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and one lowering step giveFor example, apply the total angular momentum ladder operator to the stretched state. The result has components with coefficients $1/\sqrt{3}$ and $\sqrt{2/3}$, corresponding to lowering the initial angular momentum and the vector component, respectively.

Only the $q=+1$ component of $x$ contributes to $M_1$. The $q=0$ operator $z$ cannot connect the projections in $M_2$, so that matrix element vanishes. With the convention above,Thus the requested relative magnitudes and their squared values areThese ratios presume a common nonzero reduced matrix element. The position operator has odd parity, so an electric dipole transition requires opposite-parity multiplets; for one electron the electric-dipole selection rule also gives $\Delta \ell =\pm 1$. The displayed $j,m$ labels alone do not establish that condition. If the common reduced matrix element vanishes, all three matrix elements vanish and no nonzero ratio can be inferred.

Expand the time-dependent quantum state in unperturbed energy eigenstates, factoring out free dynamical phases:The Schrödinger equation gives the exact interaction picture coefficient equationsInitially $c_n(-\infty )={\delta }_{ni}$. To first order in time-dependent perturbation theory, replace the coefficients on the right by these zeroth-order values and integrate. ThusFor a transition $j\ne i$, this is the desired leading probability amplitude, and $P_{ji}=|{\gamma }_{ji}^{(1)}{|}^2$ to leading order. The formula is understood with free asymptotic phases removed. For $j=i$, the full survival amplitude also contains the zeroth-order $1$; the displayed integral alone is its first-order correction, not the whole amplitude. This specifies the usual scattering operator meaning of the paper's notation at infinite times.

For the ion pulse, write $x_{ji}=⟨j|x|i⟩$ and $y_{ji}=⟨j|y|i⟩$. ThenConsider an excitation with ${\omega }_{ji}>0$ and put $\beta ={\omega }_{ji}b/v$, $u={\omega }_{ji}t$. The first real pulse is even in time and the second is odd. Their respective surviving Fourier components are therefore cosine and imaginary sine:Since $\beta \log (1/\beta )\to 0$, the longitudinal term is smaller for comparable position matrix elements. Hence the electric-dipole excitation by a passing ion hasThis leading limit extends to either sign of ${\omega }_{ji}$ using $|{\omega }_{ji}|b/v\ll 1$. If $x_{ji}=0$ by a selection rule, the retained leading term vanishes and the smaller longitudinal term may give the first nonzero probability. The conditions also include a small total transition probability, approximately straight constant-velocity motion, and $b$ large compared with atomic size for the electric-dipole approximation. The paper uses a Coulomb-coupling convention in which the factor is written $Z{e}^2$; in SI units replace $e^2$ throughout by $e^2/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$.

The collision duration is of order $b/v$. Excitations with angular frequency ${\omega }_{ji}$ receive an unsuppressed impulse when this is short relative to $1/{\omega }_{ji}$. In contrast, for ${\omega }_{ji}b/v\gg 1$, cancellations in the Fourier transform suppress the transition: a slowly varying distant field approximately preserves the atomic energy eigenstate. The exact dipole-pulse transforms make this explicit:where $K_{\nu }$ is a Modified Bessel function of the second kind. Their large-argument exponential decrease explains the slow-passage cutoff. These transforms are optional refinements of the small-$\beta$ derivation above, not a separate assumption about the target.

To connect the microscopic transition probability to energy loss, suppose the atom begins in a low-energy state. Exciting bound electronic states and causing ionization transfer positive energies $E_j-E_i$ from the ion to the material. For target atomic number density $n_{\mathrm{at}}$ and path length $d$, a schematic independent-encounter sum iswith a continuum integral as well as a sum for ionized final states. The short-collision formula gives $P_{ji}\propto Z^2/(b^2{v}^2)$, so the impact-parameter integral has logarithmic dependence on its cutoffs. Its upper effective cutoff is of order $v/{\omega }_{ji}$, where the transition ceases to be sudden; the lower cutoff must exclude regions where the dipole or weak-collision approximation fails. Thus the leading high-speed charge and isotope scaling of electronic stopping isAlthough a faster ion can access more energetic transitions and a wider range of distant encounters, its shorter interaction time reduces each ordinary excitation probability. In the fast-ion regime shown, the $1/v^2$ decrease dominates the slower variation of the excitation factor. The energy loss consequently falls with increasing incident kinetic energy. The original figure has $\delta E$ increasing downward, so the curves' rise toward the top of the page means decreasing loss, not increasing loss. A low-speed extrapolation of the inverse-square law is invalid because excitation thresholds, slow-passage suppression, changing ion charge and nuclear recoil can then matter.

For nonrelativistic ion mass $M$, $E=M{v}^2/2$. At fixed incident energy the leading prediction becomesThe greater atomic number of nitrogen than carbon than boron therefore gives larger loss; at the same velocity the leading species factor is $Z^2$. Within an isotopic family, the heavier ion moves more slowly at the same $E$ and loses more energy. Equivalently, a heavier isotope needs proportionally greater kinetic energy to achieve the same velocity and approximately the same electronic loss. Comparing at fixed energy per nucleon, rather than fixed total $E$, approximately removes this leading isotope mass dependence. This accounts for the separate isotope bands in the original graph without assigning different electronic excitation spectra to isotopes of the same projectile element.

The charge in this scaling is the effective ion charge if screening by bound projectile electrons is important. The interpretation assumes the same traversed material and thickness and uses the paper's small-fractional-loss regime, $\delta E/E\ll 1$; points with loss comparable to incident energy cannot be described quantitatively by treating $v$ as constant. The plotted curves support the qualitative ordering and high-energy decrease, rather than determining a universal normalization from the supplied single-atom model.

Use zero-based labels to agree with ${\varphi }_0$ in the later parts. The normalized infinite square well energy eigenstates and energy eigenvalues areThe position matrix elements in a symmetric infinite square well, obtained by integrating the product of the two wavefunctions against $x$, areThe integral in the question uses positive integer labels; replacing them by $k+1,n+1$ is essential here. Only opposite-parity states, $k+n$ odd, contribute, as also follows from the parity operator selection rule.

Second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory now gives the requested infinite sum:In fully explicit form this isThe symbol $m$ here denotes the electron mass, not a summation index. For the ground state $n=0$, every denominator in the first form is negative, so the ground energy level moves downward. For excited states, contributions from lower and higher energy levels have opposite signs.

In LS coupling, first add the individual orbital angular momenta and spins separately, then add their totals:The Coulomb interaction between electrons must separate different atomic terms more strongly than the spin-orbit interaction mixes them. Then $L,S,J,M_J$ are useful quantum numbers, with $J=|L-S|,\dots ,L+S$. This approximation is usually better for lighter chemical atoms and well-separated atomic terms; strong configuration interaction or strong spin-orbit coupling can spoil it. The term symbol is ${}^{2S+1}{L}_J$.

The general electric-dipole selection rules, for isolated chemical atoms with definite parity and total electronic angular momentum, are a change of parity, $\Delta J=0,\pm 1$ excluding $J=0\leftrightarrow 0$, and $\Delta M_J=0,\pm 1$, with the accessible magnetic sublevels determined by the light's polarization. In pure LS coupling, the additional selection rules are $\Delta S=0$ and $\Delta L=0,\pm 1$, excluding $L=0\leftrightarrow 0$. In a one-electron description the electric dipole operator also requires $\Delta l=\pm 1$ for the active electron. These latter statements can fail as exact labels when atomic terms mix; the general parity and total-angular momentum restrictions still apply. Unresolved hyperfine structure is neglected here.

For strontium, the closed core contributes $L=S=0$. The Pauli exclusion principle makes the two equivalent $5s$ electrons a singlet state. Different radial orbitals permit both a singlet state and a triplet state. Thus the complete lists of atomic fine-structure levels areThe $5s5p$ electron configuration has odd parity; the other two electron configurations have even parity.

For a closed absorbing two-level system, write $N=N_1+N_2$, let $A=1/\tau$, and use ${\sigma }_a={\sigma }_{12}$ for the absorption cross section. This differs from the stimulated-emission cross section convention in part (a). With $r=g_2/g_1$, the rate equations areAt steady state, $N_2=W_{a}N/[A+(1+1/r)W_a]$ for $W_a={\sigma }_{a}I/(\hslash \omega )$. Hence the positive absorption coefficient isFor the given sodium fine-structure transition, the statistical weights are $g_1=2$, $g_2=4$, so $r=2$ and $1+1/r=3/2$. The small-signal transmission gives the optical depthTo account for the finite decrease of intensity through the sample, integrate $dI/dz=-\kappa I$ rather than treating the stronger beam as exactly uniform. If $T=I_{\mathrm{out}}/I_{\mathrm{in}}$, this givesTaking $270\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ as the incident intensity and $T=0.967$,Using the photon energy $hc/\lambda$ then givesIgnoring the small variation of the stronger intensity would instead give about $1.11\times 10^{-13}{\mathrm{m}}^2$; the integrated value uses the stated transmissions more consistently. The length is not needed to eliminate $N$, but gives the check $N\simeq 9.3\times 10^{14}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$.

The resonant absorption cross section is of optical-wavelength-squared size, much larger than a typical atomic geometric collision area. Pressure broadening cross sections involve phase-changing interatomic encounters and need not equal hard-sphere collision areas; their numerical value depends on collision partners and speed. No precise ratio follows from the supplied data. A useful distinction is that resonant absorption involves coherent response on the optical scale, so its cross section need not resemble an chemical atom's geometric area.

For homogeneous spectral broadening, all participating chemical atoms must share the same resonance and single-atom response width. In a dilute sample dominated by natural linewidth, the weak-beam requirement isUsing the sodium atomic mass, equality occurs near $T=0.017\mathrm{K}$, so $T\ll 17\mathrm{mK}$ is a sufficient thermal condition. Spatial Zeeman energy shifts, light shifts and transit effects should also be small, the laser should address the same selected component, and the interaction should last long enough for steady populations. Uniform impact pressure broadening can also be homogeneous, but would change the width and effective cross section; it is not included in the lifetime-only numerical model.

Real sodium also has hyperfine structure and optical pumping among magnetic sublevels. The inferred ${\sigma }_a$ is the effective cross section of the stated $g_J=2J+1$ two-level system model, assuming statistical sublevel populations and no loss into unaddressed states. A measurement on a resolved, polarized closed hyperfine structure component requires its actual transition dipole moment and selection rules; a universal polarization-independent sodium cross section cannot be inferred from this simplified model. The dependence of resonant cross sections and saturation intensities on sublevel preparation is tabulated explicitly for the real sodium D lines.^[ref]

A two-photon transition transfers population through two interactions with the electric-dipole operator. For absorption of two photons,The intermediate atomic states enter a second-order amplitude rather than necessarily being populated. Suppressing field-normalization factors, its structure isBoth time orderings contribute coherently. Close to a real intermediate resonance, linewidths and intermediate-state population must be treated explicitly; an off-resonant virtual-state approximation then ceases to be adequate. Well away from saturation the absorption rate scales as $I_1{I}_2$, or as $I^2$ for a single applied frequency.

Each electric-dipole interaction reverses parity, so two such interactions connect states of the same parity. The product operator contains angular tensor ranks $0,1,2$, subject to triangle and polarization selection rules. Under the degenerate two-photon selection rule, identical equal-frequency photons have no antisymmetric rank-one contribution cancels; ranks zero and two remain. This permits a $J=0\to 0$ transition and excludes $J=0\to 1$ in that degenerate E1-E1 case. It does not universally forbid every $\Delta J=1$ transition, because a rank-two tensor can also connect some such pairs. For a single orbital electron, the corresponding orbital changes are $\Delta L=0,\pm 2$, with spin unchanged in the nonrelativistic electric-dipole approximation.

In Doppler-free two-photon absorption, counterpropagating equal-frequency photons give first-order Doppler cancellation when one photon is absorbed from each beam:The laser frequency is half the transition frequency. Same-beam two-photon events can still produce a broader Doppler-shifted background; residual beam-angle errors, unequal frequencies, AC Stark shifts and finite transit time limit precision. Thus a narrow two-photon resonance requires control of beam geometry and intensity, not just high laser power.

A stimulated Raman transition is the absorption-emission version: the atom absorbs from one beam and emits into the other, transferring between two long-lived states through an off-resonant upper state. It instead obeysCounterpropagation now enhances momentum transfer rather than cancelling it. With single-photon Hamiltonian matrix elements $\hslash {\Omega }_i/2$ and a common large angular detuning $\Delta$, eliminating the excited state givesThe two-photon detuning must include differential AC Stark and recoil shifts. Large detuning suppresses spontaneous scattering but also reduces coherent coupling at fixed optical power.

The coherent Raman route is useful for atomic beam splitters and mirrors. Mark Kasevich and Steven Chu demonstrated a laser-cooled sodium matter-wave interferometer using stimulated Raman transitions; its controlled internal-state changes accompanied separated external wave packets.^[ref] Testing this interpretation requires scanning the two-photon detuning, controlling relative laser phase and checking output populations against pulse timing. A two-photon process is defined by its coherent two-interaction pathway; absorption-absorption and absorption-emission have different resonance and recoil conditions.

A polar diatomic molecule can absorb microwaves through its permanent electric dipole moment. In the linear rigid rotor approximation,The electric-dipole selection rule is $\Delta J=+1$ in absorption. It givesso adjacent lines are separated by $2B_0$. ThereforeAssign a line near $m\times 21.999\mathrm{GHz}$ to $J=m-1\to m$ for positive integer $m$. The first member is $0\to 1$, the next $1\to 2$, and so on; if the recorded window misses the lowest lines, their absolute frequencies fix the integer offset. At high temperature many rotational states are populated, so the strongest line need not be $0\to 1$.

This is the leading rotational pattern, not a claim that real ZnF lacks spin or hyperfine structure. Fine splittings and centrifugal distortion can perturb the ideal lines; they do not explain the three systematically displaced progressions as economically as vibrational excitation.