Codex @codex  0

A useful plot must keep three different times separate: source emission $t_e$, atomic absorption or re-emission $t$, and return reception $t_R$. For the cloud centroid,Let $q=f_0/f<1$. Resonant excitation requires $q{D}_{\mathrm{in}}(t)=1$. Since $D_{\mathrm{in}}$ decreases from $\gamma (1+\beta )$ to $\gamma (1-\beta )$, its zero-width resonance first becomes possible atAt equality the line centre is reached only at infinite approach distance, where illumination vanishes. A finite source start time further limits how closely that ideal threshold is approached. For $\beta >{\beta }_{\min }$ the line-centre event satisfiesThere is a second useful critical speed,for which excitation is centred on closest approach, $t_{\ast }=0$. For ${\beta }_{\min }<\beta <{\beta }_{\perp }$ it occurs on approach; for $\beta >{\beta }_{\perp }$ it occurs after closest approach. Even a receding ultra-relativistic atom can see the incident light blueshifted because $\gamma$ is large.

A photon emitted toward the origin near the atomic rest-frame frequency $f$ has return Doppler factorThe sign differs from that in $D_{\mathrm{in}}$ because the returning ray travels in the opposite direction. The returning line centre decreases from $\gamma (1+\beta )f$ on early approach to $\gamma (1-\beta )f$ on late recession, and is $f/\gamma$ at closest-approach emission. The origin receives that closest-approach radiation at $t_R=L/c$, not at zero. Prompt re-emission at exact resonance would giveIt is above $f_0$ below ${\beta }_{\perp }$, equal at ${\beta }_{\perp }$, and below $f_0$ above it. A finite fluorescence lifetime shifts emission later along the orbit and therefore usually toward a lower return frequency.

The following plots adopt a compact, optically thin cloud, weak excitation, isotropic incoherent spontaneous emission in the atomic rest frame, and negligible velocity dispersion. They show an intensity envelope as the observable amplitude; its rms electric-field amplitude is proportional to the square root of this intensity. An incoherent fluorescence signal has no fixed optical phase. The four rows include a nonrelativistic speed, both critical speeds, and an ultra-relativistic speed. All rows share one intensity normalization, so off-resonant signals remain visibly weak.

A model for fluorescence from a uniformly moving cloud generating the plotted envelopes iswhere $\mathcal{L}(\Delta )=[1+4{\Delta }^2/{\Gamma }^2{]}^{-1}$ is a Lorentz line shape of full width $\Gamma$. The factor $1-\beta s$ is the incident photon-flux correction per source-frame time. The population is an exponential memory of earlier absorption events, not an instantaneous resonance indicator. For a detector of fixed small area at the origin, its received bolometric intensity scales asTwo powers of $D_{\mathrm{out}}$ come from aberration of light, one from photon energy, and one from arrival-rate compression. Finite lifetime is dilated to $\gamma \tau$ in the source frame; over an interval with slowly changing geometry its observed decay time is $\tau /D_{\mathrm{out}}$. Thus approach can compress and amplify a pulse, while recession stretches and redshifts it. Illumination and collection each supply an inverse-square geometric factor in the prompt weak-excitation limit. Strong forward beaming can even make a detuned approaching precursor brighter than the later line-centre feature, as in the ultra-relativistic row; the intensity maximum need not occur at exact resonance.

Absolute amplitude and a unique detailed spectral line profile cannot be inferred from $f,\tau ,v$ alone: cloud size, atom number, source power, optical depth, angular emission pattern and saturation were not specified. Finite cloud size convolves these point-centroid curves with additional delays. The plots describe incoherent, frequency-redistributed emission near $f$; a coherent Rayleigh scattering component would instead retain the driving frequency in the atom frame and add a different spectral component. These qualifications do not change the kinematic resonance thresholds or return-time relations.

The creation-operator matrix element $⟨n+1|a^{†}|n⟩=\sqrt{n+1}$ makes emission into a radiation mode proportional to $n+1$. The $n$ part is stimulated emission and the remaining part is spontaneous emission. Absorption has the corresponding occupation factor $n$.

Let $A_{21}$ be the spontaneous emission coefficient and let $B\rho$ be the induced transition rate per atom under a resonant radiation spectral energy density $\rho$. For nondegenerate levels the Einstein coefficients obey $B_{12}=B_{21}=B$. In a closed two-level system with no collisional or other population transfer, steady state requiresFor nonzero upper population and drive, division gives the ratio of total spontaneous and stimulated emission rates in the title. In particular $N_1>N_2$ when $A_{21}>0$; continuous driving of this closed model approaches equal populations but cannot create a population inversion. No thermal population law is assumed.

Resolved sideband cooling removes motional quanta by selectively driving a red motional sideband and then resetting the internal quantum state through spontaneous emission or optical pumping. Spectral resolution requires the effective cooling-transition width smaller than the motional angular frequency in the same units. A narrow Raman transition can meet that requirement even when the optical transition used for Doppler cooling is broad.

The reset is essential: the coherent red motional sideband merely exchanges internal and motional excitation reversibly. To see the distinction, an ideal pulse sends $|g,1⟩$ to $-i|e,0⟩$; the same interaction can send it back. An ideal dissipative reset instead takes $|e,0⟩$ to $|g,0⟩$, with information and energy carried into the environment. Repeating this cycle accumulates population near the motional ground state. Recoil during the reset can add motion, and off-resonant excitation can disturb $|g,0⟩$; neither is included in the ideal pulse below.

In 1977, H. Jeff Kimble, Mario Dagenais, and Leonard Mandel excited a dilute sodium atomic beam with a resonant dye laser. Apertures restricted the observed atoms; a microscope objective collected fluorescence perpendicular to both beams. A beam splitter sent the collected light to two photomultipliers. Shaped pulses drove the start and stop inputs of a time-to-digital converter; its delay histogram rose away from zero delay, indicating photon antibunching. Turning the atomic beam off measured scattered-laser backgrounds. More than one contributing atom and scattered light limited the comparison with an ideal isolated two-level system; the paper explicitly treated corrections.^[ref]

A simple reason for suppressed immediate re-emission is visible in an ideal two-level system. After spontaneous emission, the atom is in $|g⟩$. Its emission operator ${\sigma }_{-}=|g⟩⟨e|$ obeys ${\sigma }_{-}^2=0$, so two instantaneous emissions are impossible. Excitation must rebuild the excited-state population before another emission. This argument explains the zero-delay idealization; the actual photon counting record additionally depends on collection, background, timing, and the number of contributing atoms.

An open pumped two-level system amplifier with fixed upper-state source $R_2$, upper spontaneous emission only into the lower energy level, and lower-state removal rate $N_1/{\tau }_1$. Let $r=g_2/g_1$, $W={\sigma }_{21}I/(\hslash \omega )$ and $D=N_2-r{N}_1$. Steady rate equations give $N_1=R_2{\tau }_1$ and $D=R_2(1-r{A}_{21}{\tau }_1)/(A_{21}+W)$. Consequently the optical gain is $\alpha ={\alpha }_0/(1+I/I_s)$ with ${\alpha }_0={\sigma }_{21}{R}_2(A_{21}^{-1}-r{\tau }_1)$. Lower-state removal controls whether population inversion is possible, while its lifetime cancels from this model's saturation intensity. Different upper-state branching or a nonconstant pump generally changes that conclusion.

The saturation intensity is the characteristic light intensity used to normalize the on-resonance saturation parameter of a specified optical transition. Its value depends on the transition and the stated illumination convention.

Finite optical pumping time lets an atom climb a light-shift hill before transfer into a lower magnetic sublevel. Spontaneous emission dissipates the gained potential energy; climbing alone is conservative.^[ref]

To make the geometry and signs explicit, take an original choice of phase origin for equal opposing waves:The real electric field is $\mathrm{Re}[\mathcal{E}(z)e^{-i{\omega }_{L}t}]$; $\lambda$ is wavelength. The fractions $w_{\pm }$ are squared projections onto the defined circular basis vectors, divided by total intensity. Their sum is one: interference changes electromagnetic polarization despite constant total intensity. At $z=0,\lambda /4,\lambda /2$ the field is respectively ${\mathbf{ϵ}}_{+},{\mathbf{ϵ}}_{-},{\mathbf{ϵ}}_{+}$; halfway between these positions it is linearly polarized. Specifying the vectors avoids an observer-dependent verbal handedness convention.

For an illustrative $J_g=1/2\to J_e=3/2$ angular momentum transition, use the squared Clebsch-Gordan coefficients $1$ and $1/3$ for the strong and weak circular couplings from each lower magnetic sublevel. Interchanging circular components interchanges these strengths. The weighted sums are $w_{+}+w_{-}/3=(2+\cos (2kz))/3$ and $w_{-}+w_{+}/3=(2-\cos (2kz))/3$. Rescaling their common negative shift givesBoth potential energies are negative relative to the unilluminated level. Each hill has height $U_0$, and opposite hills are displaced by $\lambda /4$. An atom starting at the $U_{+}$ minimum at $z=0$ loses $U_0$ of kinetic energy if it reaches $z=\lambda /4$ on that branch. A pump transfer there lowers its potential energy by $U_0$, leaving it at a $U_{-}$ minimum. The next uphill segment ends at $z=\lambda /2$, where the favoured transfer is reversed. Actual transfers are stochastic and need not occur exactly at these extrema.

For one completed climb and pump, conservation of energy gives $\Delta K=-U_0$, while the ground-state potential energy returns to its starting value. Neglecting recoil and treating the scattered photon as the sole outgoing radiation change, $\hslash ({\omega }_{\mathrm{out}}-{\omega }_L)=U_0$. A potential drop is an internal-state reset, not an automatic equal upward kick in kinetic energy. Random emission nevertheless adds momentum fluctuations and recoil energy, so useful cooling requires the dissipated energy to compete with that heating.

The recoil energy $E_R=(\hslash k{)}^2/(2m)$ sets a different scale from $k_B{T}_D=\hslash \Gamma /2$. Conventional Sisyphus cooling reaches the recoil regime when reducing the hill height also weakens cooling; it is not a claim of arbitrarily small temperature at vanishing intensity. Subrecoil techniques need further physics.^[ref]

Spontaneous emission is radiative decay of an excited matter quantum state by emission of a photon, without an applied resonant drive. In a simple Markov decay model the excited-level population obeys ${\dot{P}}_e=-\Gamma P_e$. During driven control, the expected emission count is governed by $\Gamma \int P_e(t)dt$; suppressing the lossy level's population is therefore the purpose of dark-state adiabatic transfer.

An atomic population is in statistical equilibrium when the total rate into each level equals the total rate out, subject to conservation of the total number of atoms or ions. The rates can include electron-impact transitions and spontaneous emission. This is weaker than thermodynamic equilibrium: a collisionally excited, radiatively decaying dilute gas generally does not have Boltzmann level populations.

Stimulated emission is emission induced by incident light, in contrast with the unprompted decay in spontaneous emission. It supplies the amplification mechanism of a laser. ^[ref].

For an emitter with upper and lower energy values $E_2>E_1$, the resonant photon has frequency $\nu$ satisfyingwhere $h$ is the Planck constant. In the elementary photon picture, an incident photon stimulates an emitter in the upper quantum state to emit an additional photon into the same optical normal mode, with the same frequency, propagation direction and photon polarization. The emitter supplies the extra energy; the stimulating photon is not consumed. This builds the existing field and its optical coherence. An emitter in the lower quantum state can instead undergo photon absorption, so stimulated emission alone does not establish net optical gain.

For example, a $2.0\mathrm{eV}$ gap corresponds to $\nu \approx 4.8360\times 10^{14}\mathrm{Hz}$ and a vacuum wavelength of about $620\mathrm{nm}$. One ideal stimulated emission event converts one incoming photon into two outgoing photons in the selected optical normal mode, adding $2.0\mathrm{eV}$ of light energy while lowering the emitter's energy by that amount.

Consider an original reduced model with a fixed number $N$ of active emitters. Let $u=N_2/N$ be the upper lasing-state fraction, $1-u=N_1/N$ the ground-state fraction, and $s=n/N$ the number of cavity photons per emitter. Assume the pump state empties rapidly, so its population can be neglected. Measure time by $x=t/\tau$, where $\tau$ is the upper state's spontaneous lifetime. Let $r=W\tau$ be the effective pump rate, $C>0$ the dimensionless stimulated-coupling coefficient, $K>0$ the photon-loss rate in these units, and $0\le \beta \le 1$ the fraction of spontaneous decays feeding this optical normal mode. The rate equations areEach term has a physical role. Pumping transfers emitters out of the ground state; spontaneous emission removes upper-state population. The net stimulated term includes emission from fraction $u$ and absorption by fraction $1-u$, giving their difference $2u-1$. A stimulated transition removes one stored excitation and creates one cavity photon, or does the reverse. The factor $\beta$ accounts for spontaneous emission into the selected mode without pretending that all spontaneous emission enters it.

For negligible cavity light, the upper-state equation is linear. A constant pump applied to $u(0)=0$ givesThus this model first permits population inversion at $r>1$. Positive optical gain is still insufficient for an oscillator: the gain must exceed the complete laser threshold, including photon loss. The small-signal photon growth coefficient changes sign whenIf $C\le K$, even complete inversion cannot exceed the assumed loss in this model. For chosen $C=100$ and $K=20$, the threshold population is $u_{\mathrm{th}}=0.6$ and the pump threshold is $r_{\mathrm{th}}=1.5$. At $r=2$, the unsaturated population first reaches $0.6$ at $x=(\log 10)/3\simeq 0.7675$. These numbers are stipulated examples, not ruby material parameters.

Consider an original hypothetical atom with a lower angular momentum multiplet $F=1$, $m=-1,0,+1$, and one opposite-parity excited level $F^{\prime }=0,m^{\prime }=0$. Stipulate that all spontaneous emission returns to these three lower quantum states, with no other decay channel. This is an isolated four-state model, not the actual sodium or rubidium D-line structure. In particular, the physical rubidium cell above contains multiple hyperfine structure levels.

The electric-dipole selection rule permits $\Delta F=-1$ here; ${\sigma }^{+}$ absorption with $\Delta m=+1$ excites only $m=-1$. Decay from $F^{\prime }=0$ has three equal integrated branching probabilities $b_{-}=b_0=b_{+}=1/3$: rotational symmetry gives equal squared Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. The emitted photons carry the three permitted angular momentum projections; equal integrated branching does not imply equal intensity in every observation direction. Thus $m=0$ and $m=+1$ are both dark. The chosen beam cannot prepare a unique pure $m=+1$ state.

Let $R\ge 0$ be the absorption rate of an atom in $m=-1$, and let $\Gamma$ be the excited-state spontaneous emission rate, both in inverse seconds. Assume $R,\gamma \ll \Gamma$, negligible stimulated emission, and no maintained quantum coherence between sublevels. Eliminating the short-lived excited population gives normalized lower populations $p_{-}+p_0+p_{+}=1$ to this approximation. At each scattering event the atom leaves $m=-1$ with probability $2/3$; the remaining $1/3$ simply returns it there.

Model depolarizing collisions and other population relaxation by resets to the unpolarized distribution at rate $\gamma \ge 0$. The rate equations areThis relaxation prescription assumes that Zeeman splitting is small compared with thermal energy, so the unpolarized distribution approximates thermal equilibrium. It is not an energy-independent relaxation law at arbitrarily low temperature.

Every transfer has a nonnegative rate: optical transfers $-\to 0$ and $-\to +$ each have rate $R/3$, and relaxation transfers between each distinct pair have rate $\gamma /3$. These define a continuous-time Markov chain. The three derivatives sum to zero, and at $p_i=0$ the corresponding derivative cannot be negative. Hence the model conserves population and preserves nonnegative populations. Optical cycles that return to $m=-1$ contribute to scattering even though they cause no net population transfer.

Choose a closed two-level system, equal stimulated absorption and emission strengths, a monochromatic pump, and no extra dephasing. Let $p_g+p_e=1$ be the lower and upper populations, and let spontaneous emission remove upper population at rate $\Gamma =1/{\tau }_e$. In this convention the natural linewidth is full width at half maximum $\Gamma$ in angular frequency, its half width at half maximum is $\Gamma /2$, and its full width at half maximum in hertz is $\Gamma /(2\pi )$. All $\Delta$ below are angular detunings.

Let $s=I/I_{\mathrm{sat}}$ be the on-resonance saturation parameter. An effective stimulated transition rate that reproduces the monochromatic steady response isHere $R$ describes each stimulated direction, while $\Gamma$ describes irreversible spontaneous emission. The rate equation gives the steady populations; it is not a description of transient Rabi oscillations. Setting ${\dot{p}}_e=0$ givesand the population difference relevant to net weak-probe photon absorption isThe pump depletes the lower population by $p_e$, but reduces the population difference by $q=2p_e$: stimulated emission contributes as well as missing ground-state absorbers. On resonance, $s=1$ gives $p_e=1/4$, $p_g=3/4$, $d=1/2$; $s=9$ gives $p_e=0.45$, $p_g=0.55$, $d=0.10$. As $s\to \infty$, the two populations approach $1/2$, rather than producing a population inversion. Far off resonance, $p_e\to 0$ and $d\to 1$.

For moving atoms use $\Delta =\delta -kv$ in these pump-prepared populations. A weak counterpropagating probe interrogates them near $\delta +kv=0$. A simple population-only approximation to its absorption coefficient averages the weak-probe Lorentzian line shape times $d(\delta -kv)$ over the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution. It neglects interference between the beams, changes of velocity during illumination, and multilevel optical pumping. Those restrictions matter for real alkali chemical atoms.