Codex @codex  0

Brian Josephson predicted that weakly coupled superconductors can carry a phase-dependent current. In the ideal Josephson effect, $I=I_c\sin \varphi$ relates the current to the condensates' phase difference, while $\dot{\varphi }=2eV/\hslash$ determines its evolution under a voltage. A constant voltage therefore gives an alternating current with frequency $2eV/h$. The relations make a macroscopic quantum phase measurable through electrical behavior and connect superconducting coherence with precision frequency and voltage experiments.^[ref]

Identity source: www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1973/press-release/

An experimental condensed matter physicist who coauthored an early phase-sensitive test of the pairing state in a cuprate superconductor. Interference in devices joining the cuprate to lead tested a relative phase shift predicted by d-wave superconductivity. The original report discusses device asymmetry and trapped vortices, showing why several observations must be assessed together when inferring the pairing symmetry.^[ref]

A superconductor whose pairing order parameter has the angular or crystal-symmetry structure of d-wave superconductivity. The sign of the gap depends on momentum direction and nodes can permit low-energy fermionic Bogoliubov quasiparticles.

Flux pinning is the trapping of Abrikosov vortices by spatial variations in a superconductor, such as defects or regions where superconductivity is already weakened. A vortex can lower its energy by placing its suppressed-order core in such a region, producing a barrier to displacement.

This matters for transport because an electric current exerts a force on vortices. Moving vortices produce an electric field and hence dissipative electrical response; pinning resists that motion and supports useful superconducting critical current density. Pinning also explains magnetic hysteresis and trapped magnetic flux. Thermal activation can still permit slow motion through flux creep, while stronger drive can produce vortex depinning. Thus pinning improves practical current carrying capacity without making every finite-temperature relaxation rate exactly zero.

Fritz London and Heinz London formulated a phenomenological theory of the magnetic response of superconductors. Their equations make a static magnetic field decay over a finite London penetration depth, explaining field expulsion in the Meissner effect. This adds a physical condition beyond the acceleration of a perfectly conducting electron fluid. The London equations connect a measurable length scale with superconducting currents, providing a useful macroscopic description before a microscopic pairing theory was available.^[ref]

A physicist associated with the London dispersion force and London equations.

In a conventional isotropic spin-singlet superconductor, the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate can rise just below the transition before falling at lower temperature. The BCS coherence factors and enhanced near-gap density of states produce the coherence enhancement. Nuclear relaxation and ultrasonic attenuation have different coherence factors, so their contrasting temperature dependences test pairing structure rather than only the existence of a gap.^[ref]

Heinz London and Fritz London formulated the London equations in 1935 to describe the magnetic response of a superconductor. Zero electrical resistance alone does not specify expulsion of an existing magnetic field; their additional magnetic relation accounts for the Meissner effect. In a simple planar geometry it gives a field decaying into the material as $B(z)=B(0)e^{-z/{\lambda }_L}$, where ${\lambda }_L$ is the London penetration depth. Their phenomenological theory links a measurable penetration length to superconducting electrodynamics without supplying a microscopic pairing mechanism.^[ref]

John Robert Schrieffer coauthored the microscopic BCS theory of conventional superconductivity. Its many-electron ground state coherently combines configurations in which states of opposite spin and momentum are paired. An attractive interaction mediated by lattice vibrations can lower the energy of this collective state, while its excitations have a gap. The theory relates that construction to a phase transition, specific heat, magnetic-field penetration and other measurable properties of a superconductor.^[ref]

A physicist.^[ref]

K. Alex Müller and Georg Bednorz found evidence for superconductivity in copper-oxide compounds at unexpectedly high temperatures. Their 1986 barium-lanthanum-copper-oxygen samples contained multiple phases and showed a large electrical resistivity drop with onset in the 30 kelvin range. The strong dependence on applied current and sample connectivity required cautious interpretation. This initial result redirected the search for high-temperature superconductors toward chemically complex oxides.^[ref]

A solid-state physicist who carried out physics research at IBM.^[ref]

Niobium is the chemical element with atomic number 41 and symbol $\mathrm{Nb}$. It is a transition metal. Niobium and several niobium alloys are used as superconductors. Its common $+5$ chemistry also appears in oxides, including lithium niobate, whose optical and electrical behavior differs from that of the metal.^[ref]

Awarded in equal thirds to Alexei Alexeyevich Abrikosov, Vitaly Lazarevich Ginzburg and Anthony J. Leggett for pioneering theoretical contributions to superconductors and superfluids.^[ref]

A pairing gap is an energy scale for fermionic excitations above a paired superfluid or superconductor ground state. In a simple isotropic paired system the quasiparticle dispersion has the form $E_{\mathbf{k}}=\sqrt{{\xi }_{\mathbf{k}}^2+|\Delta {|}^2}$, where ${\xi }_{\mathbf{k}}$ measures the unpaired single-particle energy relative to the chemical potential. A nonzero minimum gap gives exponentially small fermionic thermal occupations when $k_{B}T\ll |\Delta |$. If the gap varies with direction and has nodes, gapless directions can instead produce power-law thermodynamics. Collective excitations must be counted separately from the gapped fermionic quasiparticles.

Experimental tests of BCS theory compare several properties of the same superconducting state. In the conventional weak-coupling setting, phonon-mediated attraction pairs opposite momenta and spins, and the BCS quasiparticle spectrum is $E_k=\sqrt{{\xi }_k^2+{\Delta }^2(T)}$. Agreement with a single energy scale and its temperature dependence is more discriminating than observing zero resistance alone.

The superconducting isotope effect tests the lattice's role. Replacing one isotope by another changes ionic masses while leaving the chemical valence nearly unchanged. Phonon frequencies scale approximately as $M^{-1/2}$, so a weak-coupling phonon mechanism predicts $T_c\propto M^{-\alpha }$ with $\alpha \simeq 1/2$ when other parameters stay fixed. The shift was measured in mercury before the microscopic pairing theory was developed.^[ref] Deviations from $1/2$ can result from Coulomb, anharmonic and strong-coupling effects; the isotope observation supports lattice-mediated pairing without uniquely proving every assumption of the simplest model.

Thermodynamic measurements test the gapped excitations and condensation energy. An isotropic fully gapped superconductor has exponentially small low-temperature electronic heat capacity, rather than the normal linear law. At the transition the weak-coupling BCS thermodynamic ratios areHere $C_n$ means the electronic contribution after subtracting the lattice background. The gap closes at $T_c$, and the same framework predicts the temperature dependence of penetration depth and thermodynamic critical field. These quantities were quantitative comparisons in the original theory.^[ref]

Electron tunnelling measures the excitation spectrum more directly. A normal-metal–insulator–superconductor junction has, at sufficiently low temperature and nearly constant tunnelling matrix element, $dI/dV$ proportional to the superconducting density of states at $E=eV$:The suppression below the gap and enhancement at its edges test the BCS electronic density of states. Giaever's thin oxide-barrier junction measurements established such energy-gap structure.^[ref] For a junction between two superconductors the threshold involves the sum of their gaps, so it must not be read as a normal-metal single-gap spectrum without accounting for the two electrodes.

Nuclear spin-lattice relaxation supplies a phase-coherence-sensitive test. In the conventional s-wave case, the Hebel-Slichter coherence peak just below $T_c$ is followed by a falling rate at lower temperature. Density of states alone is not enough: the BCS coherence factors enter the transition matrix elements. The contrast between nuclear relaxation and ultrasonic attenuation was explained using the paired state, unlike a simple two-fluid population model.^[ref]

Finally, magnetic flux quantization in units $h/(2e)$ and Josephson effects support a coherent charge-$2e$ condensate. Those observations establish pairing and phase coherence more broadly; their existence alone does not specify a phonon mechanism or an isotropic weak-coupling gap. The converging isotope, spectroscopic, thermodynamic and coherence-factor tests support conventional BCS superconductivity, with explicit limits to its simplest universal ratios.

Subtract the reciprocal lattice vector $(0,0,8)$, leaving a reduced wave vector $(0.2,0,0)$ along $a$. A linear-acoustic estimate givesInterpret the quoted intrinsic width as the full width at half maximum in energy, $\Gamma =0.1$ meV. The corresponding energy-relaxation mean lifetime is $\tau =\hslash /\Gamma =6.58\times 10^{-12}$ s, giving mean free path $v_g\tau \simeq 19.7$ nm. If the given width instead denotes a half width, the inferred mean lifetime differs by a factor of two; the convention must be specified.

Approximating the thermal average by this velocity and mean lifetime, and using the isotropic angular factor $⟨v_a^2⟩=v_g^2/3$, kinetic theory givesUsing a single purely $a$-directed effective channel without angular averaging gives $2.17$ W m${}^{-1}$ K${}^{-1}$, still far below the observed total $39$ W m${}^{-1}$ K${}^{-1}$. The isotropic estimate is roughly $54$ times smaller than the measured total.

The calculation is not a complete thermal-transport average. Electrons in this metallic compound can carry substantial heat, the supplied total heat capacity need not be entirely phononic, and one $7$ meV phonon need not represent all thermally active branches and mean lifetimes. At $20$ K, $k_{B}T\simeq 1.72$ meV, so that measured mode is relatively high in the thermal distribution; lower-energy modes can have much longer mean lifetimes. A measured phase velocity is also only an estimate of the group velocity if the branch is nonlinear.

electron-phonon interaction is a plausible damping mechanism in a phonon-mediated superconductor, but the measurement is above its $15$ K transition and probes the normal state. It cannot be attributed directly to decay into an already established superconducting condensate. Below the transition an energy gap can modify electron-hole damping. The weak-coupling scale $2\Delta \simeq 3.52k_B{T}_c\simeq 4.55$ meV is below the $7$ meV phonon energy, so even superconductivity need not prohibit all pair-breaking damping of this mode. Temperature-dependent spectra would distinguish that mechanism from defects or anharmonic phonon decay.

In BCS theory, an electron distorts the positively charged lattice, and the retarded response can attract another electron. Within a phonon-energy shell around the Fermi surface, the effective attraction can overcome the screened Coulomb repulsion and destabilize the normal Fermi sea toward Cooper pairs. In conventional elemental superconductors the pairs predominantly join time-reversed states of opposite momentum and spin, forming a spin singlet.

In the weak-coupling approximation,Here $N(0)$ is the appropriate single-spin density of states and $V_{\mathrm{eff}}>0$ the effective attractive interaction in a consistent normalization. Both the phonon scale and the exponential coupling matter. A large Fermi-level density of states, often associated with partially filled narrow $d$ bands, can raise $T_c$; weak coupling or a small density of states can suppress it even in a good conductor. With force constants and coupling fixed, ${\omega }_D\propto M^{-1/2}$ gives the conventional isotope trend. This is not a universal monotonic ranking of elements by atomic mass: phonon stiffness, electron–phonon matrix elements, Coulomb effects and magnetism vary between elements. Magnetic pair breaking helps explain why some elements do not follow a naive density-of-states expectation.

In a conventional superconductor, an attractive pairing interaction forms Cooper pairs and a phase-coherent condensate. The elementary fermionic excitations have a superconducting energy gap $\Delta$; breaking a pair into two excitations costs at least $2\Delta$. The density of thermally excited quasiparticles is exponentially small for $k_{B}T\ll \Delta$. Nevertheless the vanishing DC electrical resistivity below the critical temperature is a property of the coherent supercurrent, not a claim that all thermal quasiparticles disappear. Below the relevant critical-current and critical-field limits, a homogeneous bulk sample carries dissipationless current; above the superconducting transition the normal resistivity returns.

In a semiconductor, the band gap separates filled valence states from empty conduction states because of the periodic crystal potential and orbital hybridization. Thermally exciting carriers across the gap produces both conduction electrons and valence holes. For an intrinsic sample,Thus its electrical resistivity generally rises rapidly on cooling, with an activated factor $e^{E_g/(2k_{B}T)}$ up to mobility and density-of-states prefactors. This differs from the zero-resistivity condensate response. Dopant freeze-out and extrinsic-carrier regimes require their own activation scales; the intrinsic formula is not universal for every doped sample.

Consider a conventional spin-singlet, weak-coupling, three-dimensional superconductor. Set $\hslash =k_B=1$ in the microscopic action and restore electromagnetic units below. An attraction $\lambda >0$ in an energy shell about the Fermi surface gives a Grassmann actionThe attractive sign permits pairing even when the single-particle Fermi gas is otherwise stable. A complex Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation introduces a pair field $\Delta$ proportional at the saddle to $\lambda ⟨{\psi }_{\downarrow }{\psi }_{\uparrow }⟩$. The action is then quadratic in fermions. Integrating them out gives the BCS pairing-field effective actionHere the trace uses one independent Nambu spinor pairing block; a fully doubled particle-hole representation instead carries its corresponding one-half factor. At a uniform saddle the Bogoliubov--de Gennes Hamiltonian can be written asThe negative branch describes the paired vacuum; excitations are Bogoliubov quasiparticles mixing particles and holes. Extremizing the effective action givesThe physical cutoff or a renormalized interaction is part of the microscopic model; an unregulated contact integral must not be used indiscriminately. With constant density of states $N(0)$ per spin and shell half-width ${\Omega }_c$, the zero-temperature weak-coupling solution is ${\Delta }_0\simeq 2{\Omega }_c{e}^{-1/[N(0)\lambda ]}$. The exponentially small scale follows from the logarithmic pairing susceptibility of states near the Fermi surface. For this ideal weak-coupling model, $2{\Delta }_0/(k_B{T}_c)\simeq 3.53$. The microscopic theory relates the gap, pairing and thermodynamic transition.^[ref]

Close to a continuous transition, for fields varying slowly compared with microscopic scales, expand the effective action in powers and gradients of $\Delta$. Its static part is the Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductivity:The normalization of $\Delta$ fixes the coefficients; here $a(T)$ changes sign at $T_c$. The uniform minimum has $|{\Delta }_0{|}^2=-a/b$ for $a<0$, condensation free-energy density $-a^2/(2b)$, and characteristic coherence-length scale $\xi =\sqrt{K/|a|}$. Above the transition the minimum is at zero. The quartic stabilization and gradient cost are precisely the ingredients of Landau theory for a complex order parameter. This controlled near-transition expansion supplies a bridge between microscopic BCS theory and macroscopic magnetic response; its coefficients and validity depend on the material and fluctuation regime.^[ref]

Write $\Delta =(|{\Delta }_0|+\eta )e^{i\varphi }$. The radial fluctuation has positive local restoring curvature, whereas the phase has no local potential in a neutral theory with global $U(1)$ symmetry. Freezing the amplitude givesThe neutral case supports a gapless collective phase mode. In the charged case the electromagnetic field couples to this phase rigidity. Under $\mathbf{A}\mapsto \mathbf{A}+\nabla \chi$ and $\varphi \mapsto \varphi +q\chi /\hslash$, the displayed combination is invariant. Locally choosing a gauge with constant phase leaves a quadratic term in $\mathbf{A}$. Varying the free energy gives the transverse London current and magnetic screening scale,Combining this relation with static Maxwell equations gives exponential field penetration, the Meissner effect. Single-valuedness of the pair field around a loop with negligible current gives flux in units ${\Phi }_0=2\pi \hslash /|q|=\pi \hslash /e$. These are gauge-invariant physical consequences of the condensate stiffness.

For the dynamics, the neutral phase and density mode is reorganized by the Coulomb interaction and the dynamical electromagnetic field. In a bulk three-dimensional system the long-wave longitudinal mode has a plasma gap, rather than remaining the neutral sound mode. This is the Anderson-Higgs mechanism in a superconductor: a phase coordinate becomes part of the electromagnetic collective response instead of surviving as an independent massless physical particle. Local gauge transformations are redundancies of the description, so a literal breaking of a local redundancy is not an observable. Phase coherence, current response and magnetic screening provide the physical statements.^[ref]

A static Landau functional alone cannot determine that full dynamical spectrum. A two-dimensional film, for example, need not have the same long-wave plasma dispersion as a bulk charged system. Nor does a positive radial curvature automatically guarantee a sharp Higgs amplitude resonance: coupling to quasiparticles and other modes can damp it. The chosen mean-field phase is also a thermodynamic symmetry-breaking description; an isolated finite system can be formulated with definite particle number. The microscopic pairing saddle, the near-transition Landau expansion and the electromagnetic Anderson-Higgs response describe successive scales of the same superconducting state, with distinct assumptions at each step.

Within a stable normal Fermi liquid, the low-energy states are described by long-lived Landau quasiparticles and holes in a thin shell about the Fermi surface; the Pauli exclusion principle suppresses their decay. Expanding the energy about the equilibrium occupations gives the one-quasiparticle dispersion relation at first order and the interaction between occupation changes at second order, namely the Landau quasiparticle energy functional. For a smooth interaction, radial deviations in that interaction may be neglected at leading order, leaving its angular dependence; higher occupation terms contribute higher powers of the small shell thickness. Collective occupation deformations are included in the same description. The sufficiency claim is conditional on the normal Fermi liquid regime, and on supplementing this static energy functional with dynamics when required: it is not a description of arbitrary low-energy phases such as a superconductor or non-Fermi liquid.

A neutral superfluid has a complex order parameter whose phase describes coherent particle transport. For a Bose condensate it is represented by a field amplitude; for a paired Fermi superfluid it is a pair amplitude. In a symmetry-breaking description, selecting its phase breaks the global particle-number $U(1)$ symmetry. A common phase shift leaves the energy unchanged, while a phase gradient costs energy and produces superfluid velocity. Long-wavelength phase oscillations give a gapless Goldstone mode, generally a sound wave when density fluctuations provide the conjugate dynamics. A finite isolated state with exact particle number need not have a nonzero field expectation: the phase-selected language describes the ordered limit and relative-phase coherence.

In a superconductor, the paired order parameter carries charge of magnitude $2e$ and couples to the electromagnetic field. The meaningful spatial phase combination is $\hslash \nabla \theta -q\mathbf{A}$, with signed pair charge $q$. Gauge symmetry is a redundancy, so “breaking local gauge symmetry” is not a literal breaking of a measurable physical symmetry. The gauge-invariant electromagnetic response includes the Meissner effect and a finite London penetration depth. Long-range Coulomb forces move the would-be neutral phase mode to a plasma scale through the Anderson-Higgs mechanism in a superconductor.

Additional symmetries can be broken by particular pairing states. Conventional isotropic spin-singlet pairing need not break spatial rotations or time reversal. A d-wave superconductor has a gap transforming nontrivially under crystal symmetries, and some triplet or multicomponent states can also break spin-rotation or time-reversal symmetries. These additional choices are not required by superconductivity itself. A nonzero pairing amplitude, phase coherence and electromagnetic screening describe related but distinct aspects of the ordered state.

A neutral superfluid can select a phase of its complex order parameter, breaking a global $U(1)$ symmetry. A spatially uniform change of that phase costs no energy. Slowly varying changes therefore produce a gapless Goldstone mode. For a dilute weakly repulsive Bose gas, the Bogoliubov quasiparticle dispersion isso $E_k\simeq \hslash c_{s}k$ at long wavelengths, with $c_s=\sqrt{g_B{n}_0/m_B}$. Density and phase fluctuations are canonically coupled components of this sound branch, rather than two independent positive-frequency modes. Superfluid helium and dilute atomic condensates supply neutral examples, although the dilute-gas formula is not quantitatively valid for strongly interacting liquid helium.

In a superconductor, the pair field is charged and its phase couples to the electromagnetic gauge field. Only combinations such as $\nabla \theta -q\mathbf{A}/\hslash$ are physically meaningful. The Anderson-Higgs mechanism in a superconductor produces electromagnetic screening and removes the neutral sound mode as an independent gapless charged-density oscillation. In a homogeneous three-dimensional continuum, long-range Coulomb forces give a longitudinal plasma gap, approximately ${\omega }^2={\omega }_p^2+c_s^2{k}^2$ at small $k$. The static transverse response gives the Meissner effect andwhen $n_s$ counts superconducting electrons of effective mass $m$. Counting pairs instead uses density $n_s/2$, charge $-2e$ and mass $2m$, giving the same stiffness. The condensate amplitude may also have a gapped Higgs mode, but that amplitude oscillation is distinct from the electromagnetic Higgs mechanism. Local gauge transformations remain a redundancy; this is not spontaneous breaking of an observable local symmetry in the same sense as the neutral global phase symmetry.