Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 68 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The local metric tensors do not determine the global coordinate identifications. The usual complete two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime is the hyperboloid in ambient signature , withPulling back the ambient metric tensor gives , withUnwrapping gives the universal cover of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime instead. The usual embedded two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime has in signature andHere and is initially periodic modulo . The time circles are closed timelike curves. Its physically standard universal cover removes that identification:The two signs of describe two spatial ends; imposing would retain only half of this complete model.
Both spacetimes have constant curvature and are geodesically complete. In the paper's convention their Ricci scalars are respectively and . Their embeddings show that geodesics are intersections with planes through the ambient origin. They nevertheless have very different causal structures.
For the geodesics of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime, use an affine parameter , normalization and conserved momentum . ThenTimelike geodesics extend to both infinite proper times; is a simple example. Null geodesics obey , so their affine parameter is also infinite at either temporal end. Spacelike geodesics have , obey and are closed curves on the embedded cylinder; is its simplest spacelike geodesic circle. Unwrapping the spatial circle removes closure but not completeness.
For the geodesics of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime, the timelike Killing vector gives . The normalization is , henceChoose a future-directed timelike geodesic, so andFor , it oscillates radially with proper period ; gives the central geodesic . In both cases, global time advances by over a proper time interval . The curve is closed on the original hyperboloid, while its lift on the universal cover is nonclosed and future-directed. Null geodesics have and reach either spatial end only at infinite affine parameter. Spacelike geodesics satisfy and also have infinite proper length toward either end. Thus the finite coordinate time discussed below does not imply physical geodesic incompleteness.
The conformal cylinder of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime follows by setting :Its past and future conformal boundaries are spacelike circles. Null geodesics have and can travel only a finite angular distance over the entire infinite proper-time history. For the complete observer , an event can send a signal to that observer precisely when its shortest angular distance is less than . The observer horizons in two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime are therefore the null curves ; its past signal horizon has . These are observer horizons, without curvature singularities. Their intersection bounds a static patch with metric tensorThe horizons at are regular Killing horizons beyond which this static chart fails, while the global coordinates remain smooth.
For the conformal strip of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime, set . On its universal cover,The two conformal boundaries are timelike. A null ray from the center approaches a boundary after coordinate time , though its affine parameter diverges. Every interior event can signal to the complete central static observer in finite global time, so that observer has no event horizon. A Poincaré horizon concerns a restricted coordinate patch, and accelerated observers can have different causal horizons.
Finally, the global de Sitter cylinder and its spatial cover are globally hyperbolic: constant-time slices are Cauchy hypersurfaces. The anti-de Sitter universal cover is not globally hyperbolic, because timelike infinity admits incoming signals within finite global time. A field's evolution therefore requires boundary conditions at its two conformal boundaries in addition to initial data. The opposite placement of the conformal boundaries explains why de Sitter observers have cosmological horizons despite global hyperbolicity, while the central anti-de Sitter observer has no event horizon despite the failure of global hyperbolicity.
Conformal cylinder and observer horizons of de Sitter spacetime compared with the timelike boundaries of the anti-de Sitter universal cover
. Details. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 75 3 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In the ambient space of signature , AdS is . Let an arbitrary event have embedding vector , and let be any future unit timelike tangent, soThe complete family through that event isDirect substitution gives and . Its ambient acceleration is , normal to the hyperboloid, so its tangential covariant acceleration vanishes. This proves that is proper time and that each curve is a timelike geodesic, rather than just guessing sinusoidal tracks from the diagram.
An AdS isometry can place any chosen at . Rotate the spatial direction into the displayed signed diameter. Write the initial local velocity as , with . Then , and . Eliminating using the global coordinates givesVarying the speed gives the drawn family; suppressed spatial directions can be restored by varying the tangent direction. It represents all timelike initial directions after the isometry and spatial rotations.
Timelike geodesics through an arbitrary AdS event, placed at the center by an isometry, refocusing at later antipodal events
. Details. Every finite-speed curve turns before the conformal boundary. At proper time , all reach ; at their ambient coordinates return to . This is Anti-de Sitter timelike geodesic refocusing. On the universal cover the global time has advanced by and , respectively, so these are later events. They are not closed timelike curves. The limits approach the null directions and are not timelike members of the family.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 54 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In ordinary spherical coordinates, , , and with periodic identification. The regular coordinate chart excludes the origin and polar axes; the endpoint ranges include the usual spherical identifications. With null coordinates and , both are real and their joint domain is . The inverse relations giveThe arctangent coordinates obey . Since and , the rescaled metric isNow , , so . Thus the Minkowski conformal compactification hasThe full coordinate ranges are linked, not independent: and with . Inverse coordinates are , , , . The conformal factor isThe unphysical metric extends as the unit-radius Einstein static universe on , where with the endpoint two-spheres collapsed. Physical Minkowski spacetime occupies the triangular radial domain , ; the edge is the ordinary spatial center, not an infinity or physical boundary.
In the closure, the infinite-coordinate limits have locationsThese are future timelike infinity, past timelike infinity, spacelike infinity, future null infinity and past null infinity. For example has with finite , while has with finite . A diagram point with stands for a two-sphere, and each null boundary is topologically ; their three corners are points after the angular collapse. On the null boundaries and , whereas the three corners have a degenerate zero gradient. Thus a compactifying metric can be smooth there even though those infinity points are not ordinary smooth null-boundary points.
The geodesic endpoints in Minkowski conformal compactification can be established directly. A physical inertial timelike geodesic has , , with and . At future infinity , so and the curve ends at . At past infinity both tend to , giving . Every complete inertial timelike path has these endpoints, regardless of velocity.
For a future-directed null geodesic, , with . As , but has a finite limit; the endpoint lies on . As , but has a finite limit, giving an endpoint on . A conformal transformation preserves these null paths as unparametrized geodesics. The null affine parameter under a conformal rescaling obeys ; here at the null endpoints, so the unphysical affine parameter reaches them in finite time, although the physical affine parameter is infinite.
A physical spacelike geodesic has , , with . At either end asymptotically, and , so both ends approach . Timelike and spacelike physical geodesic paths are not generally geodesics of the rescaled metric. Their physical proper time or length is infinite, while gives finite unphysical proper time or length near the endpoints. Infinity at finite diagram coordinates does not imply incompleteness of physical Minkowski geodesics.
Minkowski conformal compactification and the endpoints of timelike, null and spacelike geodesics
. Details. The original Penrose diagram suppresses the angular spheres. The displayed physical paths illustrate their distinct endpoint types; the two sloping boundaries are null infinity, while the left edge is the regular center.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 55 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use units , signature , and the weak-field metric . Define the trace-reversed metric perturbation by , with . In the Lorenz gauge in linearized gravity, , the sign convention of Q2 givesFor completeness, the linearized Ricci tensor in this convention isSubstituting the Lorenz condition and trace reversing gives the stated Einstein tensor. For a stationary source, , so .
Keep the monopole terms of order and the leading term linear in the rotation rate. Since , the latter metric term is of order on the shell. Thus it would disappear from a strictly order- truncation; the requested approximation must retain the leading rotation correction as well. Terms generate metric corrections of order and are neglected. Corrections to four-velocity normalization and the supporting shell stresses affect the omitted higher orders. To retained order,The minus sign in comes from lowering its spatial index; using in its place would reverse the dragging direction.
The scalar Poisson solution regular at the centre and vanishing at spatial infinity is outside the shell and inside. Continuity and the derivative jump verify the density . Also at this order. Undoing trace reversal givesComparing with the scalar parts of the interior line element yields and .
For the mass-current contribution writeEach nonzero angular component is a degree-one spherical harmonic. The supplied Laplacian eigenvalue therefore givesAway from the shell, the two radial solutions are and . Regularity at and decay at infinity select and . Continuity at requires , and integrating the differential equation across the shell givesThus , with . Trace reversal leaves mixed components unchanged, so . The paper writes , giving the frame dragging inside a slowly rotating spherical shellThis dipole matching is valid throughout ; it does not assume the observation point is very close to the centre. The stationary current is divergence-free, so this solution also satisfies the Lorenz gauge. The exterior result is , where the thin shell has , providing a check on the coefficient.
To identify the freely falling frames inside, let be the ordinary spatial rotation by angle . Define the inertial coordinates inside a slowly rotating spherical shell byDifferentiating and dropping , products beyond the retained rotation order, and giveswhich is precisely the interior metric. Thus the retained interior curvature is zero, despite its nontrivial relation to the nonrotating coordinates anchored at infinity. Timelike geodesics in these local inertial coordinates are straight lines , with . In the original coordinates this isunderstood to the same perturbative order. Their coordinate equation is to first rotation order. There is no interior Newtonian acceleration from the constant potential; the velocity-dependent term is the apparent Coriolis term relative to the locally dragged inertial axes.
A freely transported gyroscope at rest in the interior to the retained order has constant spatial direction in the frame, hence its direction in the original axes obeys . Local inertial axes precess in the same sense as the shell, at relative to distant nonrotating axes. This is the interior Lense-Thirring precession. For a weak shell the dragging is only a small fraction of its angular velocity, not perfect corotation. It is compatible with the equivalence principle: rotation relative to distant axes is a comparison between frames, and local flatness at the retained order does not make that comparison vanish. Quadratic rotation terms, which would include centrifugal effects and additional curvature, are outside the requested leading approximation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 55 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Both metrics have curvature radius one and signature . Their global topology must be specified as well as their local metric. The usual two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime is the hyperboloid in three-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, parametrized byThus and is periodic modulo , for example . Spatial slices are circles. Unwrapping instead gives the universal cover, not the usual closed spatial model.
The ordinary two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime hyperboloid is in ambient signature , withOn this quadric and is periodic modulo . The closed time circles are timelike, so it contains closed timelike curves. The usual physically causal AdS model is its universal cover, for which , with time no longer identified. The signed radial coordinate has two spatial ends; restricting to would retain only half of this global model. The metric by itself cannot distinguish periodic time from the cover. The scalar curvature is for de Sitter and for AdS in the Ricci convention of Q2. Both are maximally symmetric and have no curvature singularity; these toy two-dimensional metrics illustrate causal geometry rather than the ordinary four-dimensional matter field equations.
For the conformal cylinder of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime, introduceThenThe conformal boundaries are spacelike circles, representing past and future infinity. Null geodesics are straight lines , with the periodic spatial identification. The finite total conformal-time interval explains the cosmological horizons: light cannot complete a full trip around the circle during the entire history.
For the conformal strip of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime, useso on the universal coverIts two conformal boundaries at are timelike. Null rays are , and the strip extends for arbitrarily long coordinate time. The distances in these conformal diagrams are not physical lengths: a conformal boundary may be reached in finite coordinate time while lying infinitely far away in physical affine parameter.
Conformal cylinder and observer horizons of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime, compared with the timelike boundaries and geodesics of the AdS universal cover
. Details. The sides of the de Sitter diagram are identified; its top and bottom are spacelike infinities. The AdS diagram shows a finite window of an infinite time strip, with no identification of top and bottom. Null rays have slope one in both diagrams. The blue curves are timelike geodesics, while the colored de Sitter lines bound the central observer's causal domains.
The geodesics of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime can be derived directly. Let an overdot denote an affine parameter normalized so that the tangent norm is for timelike, null and spacelike geodesics. The cyclic coordinate gives conserved , and normalization givesWriting reduces this to . For a future-directed timelike geodesic,The spatially comoving curves are geodesics, and every timelike geodesic extends through all , with infinite proper time in both directions. Initially comoving nearby observers have physical separation proportional to , displaying de Sitter's tidal defocusing. Relative separation can initially decrease for other initial velocities; not every pair is monotonically separating.
For a nontrivial null geodesic, and . Hence the conformal infinities at occur at infinite affine parameter, despite their finite values of . For a spacelike geodesic, and . Over a full affine-length period , integrating gives a change . Thus the spacelike geodesics close on the usual cylinder. The special case is the equatorial circle . These closed spacelike curves do not threaten causality.
The geodesics of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime instead conserve . Their norm equation givesA future timelike geodesic has andIts turning points are . Timelike geodesics oscillate rather than escaping to the spatial boundary. For , the central curve is geodesic. Integrating shows that a full proper-time period advances coordinate time by . They close on the periodically identified hyperboloid but remain complete nonclosed curves on the universal cover. Geodesics leaving reconverge at after proper time , illustrating AdS tidal focusing. A static observer at nonzero fixed is accelerated, not one of these oscillating free trajectories.
For AdS null geodesics, and . They approach either timelike conformal boundary at infinite affine parameter, while the coordinate-time travel from the centre is only . A spacelike geodesic has and connects the two spatial ends with infinite affine length. Both global models are geodesically complete. Reflecting a signal at the AdS conformal boundary is a choice of boundary condition for fields; it is not an automatic continuation of a geodesic at a finite affine endpoint.
For the complete de Sitter observer at , let be the shortest angular distance. An event at can send a signal reaching the observer at a finite future time exactly whenIt can receive a signal sent by the observer at a finite past time exactly when . Equality gives the future and past observer horizons in two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime; their null branches are respectively and on the displayed cylinder. Their intersection is the central static patch, . All complete timelike geodesic observers have analogous horizons by de Sitter symmetry. These are observer-dependent cosmological horizons, not singularities of the global coordinates or Cauchy horizons.
In contrast, the complete central AdS observer can exchange signals with every event at finite : the conformal distance is finite and the observer exists for all . Its static Killing vector has squared norm everywhere. Thus global AdS on its cover has no cosmological event horizon for this observer, although other restricted patches or accelerated observers can have horizons.
The causal predictability distinction is also important. Global de Sitter is globally hyperbolic: constant- circles are Cauchy surfaces. A causal curve is monotone in and satisfies ; if it ended at finite , compactness of the spatial circle would allow an endpoint and extension. Hence an inextendible causal curve crosses every such slice once. AdS on the cover has no closed timelike curves, but it is not globally hyperbolic. For two central events at and , with , their causal diamond contains events at and arbitrarily large , so it is not compact. Initial data alone do not determine field evolution without conditions at the timelike conformal boundaries. de Sitter has spacelike conformal infinities and cosmological observer horizons; covered AdS has timelike conformal infinities and requires boundary data. The distinction between the AdS quadric and its universal cover is also explained in David Tong's general relativity lectures.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 59 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Printed metric tensor. There is a genuine false premise. For the metric tensor actually printed, introduce . Since and ranges over all real values,This is global two-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, an example of how a time-dependent lapse can disguise flat spacetime. A future-directed timelike geodesic from the stated event, parametrized by proper time , hasFor the spatial position is unbounded, not periodic; is strictly increasing. The curve , is an explicit counterexample. Physically these are inertial particles moving at constant Minkowski velocity . The nonlinear original time coordinate does not create a confining force.
Likely intended spatial lapse. The hint instead fits the different metric tensor , the unit-radius two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime in global static coordinates. This interpretation is not substituted silently for the printed one. For that metric tensor the conserved energy is , and normalization givesPutting gives , hence an outgoing geodesic from the origin hasThe supplied integral shows that increases by over each proper-time half-period. Thus the spatial oscillation repeats after proper time and coordinate time , with turning points . It describes gravitationally confined inertial motion in AdS. On the universal cover, is not identified and the worldline is not closed; identifying modulo makes the timelike geodesic closed. For the central particle stays at .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 60 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
General relativity models spacetime by a smooth four-dimensional Lorentzian manifold whose metric tensor governs clock readings, causal cones and free-particle motion. The Einstein equivalence principle motivates local special relativity and universal geodesic free fall for test bodies; it does not by itself select a unique gravitational field equation. We assume a Levi-Civita connection, a metric tensor as the gravitational field with no additional dynamical gravitational variables, and matter with a covariantly conserved stress-energy tensor. Units have .
The existence of local inertial frames is a local statement. At any regular event choose an orthonormal frame and Riemann normal coordinates, so that and at the event, with metric signature . Metric compatibility then gives there. The geodesic equation at that point is the special-relativistic inertial equation. Along a timelike geodesic, a parallel-transported orthonormal frame gives Fermi normal coordinates, eliminating the connection along the central worldline. These constructions do not in general eliminate second derivatives of the metric tensor in a neighborhood. The Riemann curvature tensor is built from the derivatives of the connection coefficients as well as their quadratic terms; nonzero Riemann curvature tensor components can remain when all connection coefficients vanish at a chosen point. Conversely, Polar coordinates in Minkowski spacetime can have nonzero connection coefficients but zero Riemann curvature tensor. Connection coefficients alone are therefore not an invariant measure of gravity.
For the tensorial content, consider a two-parameter family of geodesics parametrized by an affine parameter, with tangent and connecting field . Their coordinate construction gives , and torsion-freeness gives . Since , commuting derivatives in the convention of Question 1 yields geodesic deviation:The left side is covariant relative acceleration, rather than the second coordinate derivative of an arbitrary separation. In an orthonormal frame in free fall with , its spatial components are . This is a measurable tidal force, and a coordinate transformation cannot make a nonzero Riemann curvature tensor disappear. It is the distinction between gravity at one event and the behavior of an extended freely falling laboratory.
In a static Newtonian limit, and , so the test-body acceleration is . The curvature-sign convention in Killing derivative identities gives . Hence relative acceleration is the negative Hessian of the gravitational potential. For the Newtonian potential of a point mass , the Hessian has radial eigenvalue and two tangential eigenvalues : radial separations stretch and tangential ones compress. Outside the source the Ricci tensor can vanish while the Riemann curvature tensor remains nonzero. Its vacuum tidal part is encoded by the Weyl tensor; vacuum does not mean flatness. Gravitational waves likewise carry Riemann curvature tensor disturbances without a local material source.
To obtain the field equations, make the additional dynamical assumptions explicit: locality and diffeomorphism invariance of general relativity; a symmetric metric tensor field equation using at most second derivatives of the metric tensor; a geometrical left-hand side linear in the Riemann curvature tensor with constant coefficients; and compatibility with local matter conservation. These restrictions exclude higher-curvature or extra-field alternatives. Under them the available rank-two curvature contractions give the ansatzThe contracted Bianchi identity and metric compatibility giveFor this to vanish identically for arbitrary metric tensors, . Assuming and absorbing its normalization into the coupling givesThe permitted constant term is the cosmological constant. Its value is not fixed by the equivalence principle. Conservation of follows for generally covariant matter on its equations of motion: varying the matter action under a compactly supported infinitesimal diffeomorphism, then integrating its term by parts, gives . The divergence-free Einstein tensor is consistent with this identity.
The coupling sign must be fixed in the actual curvature-sign convention in Killing derivative identities, with . For the static weak-field approximation, . Set for the local asymptotically flat Newtonian comparison. In four dimensions the trace equation gives , so for slowly moving matter. Matching forces . Thus, with this convention,Under the opposite curvature-sign convention in Killing derivative identities the coupling sign reverses, as in Einstein-equation coupling under reversed curvature. This sign statement is compatible with the supplied linearized handout. Local inertial frames remove the connection at an event; tidal Riemann curvature tensor effects remain tensorial, and the field equations require dynamical assumptions beyond the equivalence principle.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ii Paper 4 36C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Birkhoff theorem states that every spherically symmetric vacuum solution of Einstein's equations with zero cosmological constant is locally Schwarzschild, with a constant mass parameter. In particular its exterior vacuum geometry is locally static even if the spherical material source moves. Assuming no exterior matter or outgoing matter radiation, the region outside the collapsing star is vacuum with its conserved total mass , so the given Schwarzschild metric is appropriate there. Spherical gravitational radiation does not provide an extra time-dependent vacuum degree of freedom. Matter emission would invalidate the vacuum premise.
Use units and signature as in the displayed metric. For a radial timelike geodesic, stationarity gives conserved energy per unit mass . Proper-time normalization giveson the ingoing branch. At the horizon , so , with for an infaller from the exterior. Henceis finite near the horizon. If release is from rest at a finite radius, the integrable square-root behavior at the release point also gives finite elapsed proper time. Thus the observer crosses the horizon in finite proper time; the Schwarzschild coordinate singularity is not a physical barrier.
By contrastso diverges. Schwarzschild time is the limiting proper time of stationary observers at infinity. For actual signals, an outward radial null ray adds a propagation delay involving ; signals emitted ever closer to the horizon reach a distant observer ever later and increasingly redshifted. No signal emitted at or inside the event horizon reaches that observer. Thus “seeing crossing only after infinite time” means an asymptotic observational limit, not an eventual finite-time sighting.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 61 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take both curvature radii to be one. Coordinate ranges depend on the global identification, which a line element alone cannot fix. For the ordinary two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime,This is the unit hyperboloid in ambient signature , parametrized by , , . Unwrapping instead gives its universal cover.
For two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime, the embedding in ambient signature is parametrized by , , . On this hyperboloid and is periodic modulo , creating closed timelike circles. The physically usual universal cover removes that periodicity:Both signs of are needed for the full two-dimensional spatial line. Taking without an additional construction would omit one of its two ends. The following causal comparison uses the AdS universal cover.
Both models are maximally symmetric Lorentzian manifolds, with constant sectional curvature and no curvature singularities. In the paper's convention their Ricci scalars are respectively and . The de Sitter spatial scale factor contracts to a nonzero minimum and then expands; is not a big-bang singularity. The AdS metric is static, and is timelike everywhere because .
The embeddings give a concise classification of all affinely parametrized geodesics. Geodesic acceleration in the ambient space is normal to the hyperboloid, hence proportional to . Differentiating the constraint and setting , with for timelike, null and spacelike curves, givesEvery solution stays in the two-plane spanned by its initial point and tangent , so every geodesic is a plane section through the ambient origin. For de Sitter, these are for timelike curves, for null curves, and for spacelike curves. Thus timelike geodesics and null geodesics are complete and nonclosed, while spacelike geodesics are closed circles on the ordinary hyperboloid. These are the geodesics of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime.
For AdS the roles of the circular and hyperbolic solutions are reversed: timelike curves are , null curves are , and spacelike curves are . Timelike curves close after proper time on the hyperboloid, but their lifts on the universal cover continue to ever later time rather than forming closed curves. All three kinds extend for arbitrary affine parameter. This is geodesics of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime, not an assertion that geodesics reach the conformal boundary in finite physical affine length.
The coordinate first integrals make the behavior concrete. In de Sitter, spatial rotational symmetry gives a conserved , and normalization givesConstant- observers are timelike geodesics. Nontrivial null geodesics have affine parameter proportional to , which diverges at both . In AdS the conserved static energy is , withFor timelike curves, andThey oscillate through the center and never reach spatial infinity; is the geodesic. For null curves, , so both ends are at infinite affine parameter. Spacelike AdS geodesics likewise extend to the two spatial ends.
For the conformal structure, introduce de Sitter conformal timeMultiplying by gives the conformal cylinder of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The past and future conformal infinities are spacelike circles at . Null curves are modulo . Although the conformal-time interval is finite, their physical affine parameters and timelike observers' proper times are infinite at its ends. Constant- circles are Cauchy hypersurfaces; global de Sitter is globally hyperbolic.
For AdS putThe conformal strip of two-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime has unbounded time and timelike conformal boundaries at . Null curves have . A signal from any finite reaches the center in coordinate time , and a null curve crosses the entire conformal strip in time . This finite coordinate travel time coexists with infinite physical affine length to the boundary. The covering spacetime has no closed timelike curves, but is not globally hyperbolic: causal curves can arrive from timelike infinity without meeting a proposed initial slice. Field evolution consequently requires boundary conditions as well as initial data. Unwrapping time removes closed timelike curves, not the timelike boundary.
The contrast in observer event horizons follows directly from these null curves. For the complete de Sitter observer , let be shortest angular distance. An event can send a signal to this observer before its future endpoint precisely whenEquality is its future observer event horizon. It can receive a signal emitted by the observer after its past endpoint precisely when , whose equality is the past horizon. In the observer's fundamental domain these horizons are null linesTheir intersection encloses the observer's static patch of de Sitter spacetime, the diamond . They are observer-dependent cosmological horizons, not curvature singularities or Cauchy horizons. Every inertial observer has the corresponding horizons by de Sitter symmetry.
For the complete AdS static observer at , every event at finite can send a signal to the observer, and can receive one, because time is unbounded and the coordinate distance is finite. Thus there is no corresponding global static-observer event horizon. The lapse never vanishes in these coordinates. Restricted accelerated-observer patches can have observer horizons, but those are distinct from the global static model. On the original periodic-time AdS hyperboloid, the more serious issue is closed timelike curves.
Conformal cylinder of de Sitter and covering anti-de Sitter strip, showing null geodesics, observer horizons and causal boundaries
. Details. The figure identifies the de Sitter spatial edges and displays only a finite time window of the AdS covering strip, whose time continues indefinitely. Solid red curves are null geodesics; the oscillating AdS curve is a timelike geodesic. The shaded de Sitter diamond is the static observer's two-way communication region, not the entire spacetime.
The concise comparison is de Sitter has spacelike conformal infinities and cosmological observer horizons; covering AdS has timelike conformal boundaries and no horizon for an eternal global static observer. Both are constant-curvature and geodesically complete, but their geodesic recurrence, global topology, causal boundaries and initial-value properties differ.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 61 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The original spherical coordinates have , , and , with periodic. The angular coordinates degenerate at the polar axis and all angles identify at ; a regular spherical chart uses , and suitable overlapping angular patches.
The retarded time and advanced coordinate both range over , with the joint restriction . Their inverse relations are and , soSet , . ThenThe conformal factor is . Since , multiplication by givesFinally and give . HenceThis is a region of the Einstein static universe, with positive time and negative spatial signature. The exact joint coordinate domain isor equivalently and . The regular radial chart has ; is the ordinary centre. The angular ranges are unchanged. It is important not to treat the stated individual ranges of as independent. The inverse map and conformal factor provide a useful check:
The resulting Minkowski conformal compactification has a triangular radial Penrose diagram. The two sloping boundary edges areThese are future null infinity and past null infinity. The three vertices are future timelike infinity , past timelike infinity and spacelike infinity . They are ideal boundary points, not events of physical Minkowski spacetime.
For a complete inertial timelike geodesic, with . As , both and tend to , so and the curve ends at . As , both tend to , giving . These endpoints occur at infinite physical proper time.
For a complete null geodesic, write , . To the future, , so is finite and . Thus with finite: the endpoint lies on . To the past, remains finite while , giving . Physical affine parameter is infinite at both ends. Along a radial null path, , so the diagram represents its null directions at degrees.
For a complete spacelike geodesic, take , with . At either end asymptotically, so , and . Both ends therefore reach , again at infinite physical affine parameter. These are the geodesic endpoints in Minkowski conformal compactification.
Radial conformal compactification of Minkowski spacetime with images of complete timelike, null and spacelike geodesics
. Details. Only conformal preservation of null geodesic paths is guaranteed. The pictured timelike and spacelike curves are images of physical geodesics, not generally geodesics of the unphysical metric. For a null path, an unphysical affine parameter satisfies . Since near a generic null-infinity endpoint, the unphysical parameter can converge while the physical parameter diverges. At and , the usual smooth-boundary condition degenerates; these vertices should not be treated as regular points of null infinity.
Complete Minkowski spacetime has no black-hole event horizon. Every physical event can send an outgoing null signal to , so the black-hole region is empty. There is likewise no particle or future event horizon for an eternal inertial observer: any finite event can eventually signal that observer. Null infinity is a conformal boundary, not a physical horizon. Uniformly accelerated observers can have Rindler horizons, but that is an observer-dependent restriction and is not a horizon of the full inertial Minkowski spacetime.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 63 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use geometrized units, and denote the beacon's proper time by to distinguish it from the short emitted duration . Take at release. The period , the duration , and the wavelength are measured by the beacon's own clock. Its radial timelike geodesic has conserved Killing energy per unit rest mass , where . Initially at , so . Normalization of the four-velocity givesFor the Schwarzschild radial fall from rest at a finite radius, introduceIndeed and reproduce the inward radial equation. At the Schwarzschild event horizon, and . HenceThis is the finite falling-clock time to the event horizon. By contrast, Schwarzschild time obeys and diverges at crossing. Near the horizon , so and .
Every outward optical pulse emitted while can reach a distant observer, and no pulse emitted after entry into the future black-hole region can do so. The infinite coordinate crossing time does not produce infinite emissions, because the pulse clock runs in proper time. If there is a pulse at release, the escape times are for . Thus 24 pulses are received, counting the pulse at release; 23 are emitted subsequently during the fall. More generally the PDF does not specify the phase of the pulse clock. For a first emission at with , the finite pulse count for a falling Schwarzschild beacon isThe ceiling handles a pulse scheduled exactly at crossing correctly: it cannot escape. This count concerns pulses associated with the fall, not any pulses emitted before release, and assumes an ideal observer able to detect arbitrarily redshifted signals.
To find the stretching of an optical pulse, use the Schwarzschild tortoise coordinate . An outward radial null geodesic has constant Schwarzschild retarded null coordinate . At an observer's fixed large radius , its arrival time is ; therefore only the varying emission value of contributes to the interval between arriving wavefronts. Differentiating along the falling source givesThe outgoing pulse redshift from a radial Schwarzschild infaller includes both gravitational redshift and the emitter's inward Doppler shift. A short pulse emitted at radius has, to leading order in its duration,For a finite receiver radius, replace by to measure the receiver's proper time and frequency; this correction is negligible for . The inverse scaling of frequency follows because the number of carrier cycles is unchanged when the pulse is stretched. Here is ordinary frequency, not angular frequency, in units with light speed one.
Under the release-phase convention, the last emission is at . Solve to obtain , , and . Because and this pulse begins before crossing, the local short-pulse approximation applies. Thus its approximate observed duration and frequency areWithout fixing that phase, these numerical coefficients are not unique: put , find from the parameterization, and use the boxed general formulas. For a last pulse close to crossing, with but , the horizon redshift of a Schwarzschild infaller gives the useful estimatesIf a phase instead places the pulse within one pulse-duration of crossing, , a single constant stretching factor is inappropriate. The received extent of a complete escaping pulse is exactly ; a pulse straddling crossing has an escaping tail extending to arbitrarily late arrival times, whose instantaneous frequency tends to zero. The finite count remains valid, while its last-pulse duration then has no finite constant multiple of . This identifies precisely what the unspecified pulse phase can change.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 63 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take positive outward and define the separation as upper minus lower position. The Newtonian potential of a point mass gives the acceleration . Expanding its difference across a separation gives the tidal force equationThe upper particle falls slightly less rapidly, so the separation increases. If the upper particle carries the electric charge and the electric field points outward, the extra relative acceleration is . Reversing the field or placing the charge on the lower particle changes its sign. Write this signed acceleration as and put . With initial relative velocity zero and nearly constant and , the ordinary differential equation has solutionFor , the leading changes due to the tidal force and electric field are respectivelywith the stated sign convention. Thus, for a nonzero fixed electric acceleration,A laboratory of size has , so this ratio tends to zero as . This is local tidal acceleration scaling: gravitational relative acceleration is proportional to separation, whereas the electric difference persists even at coincident positions.
The duration also matters. At fixed time, in absolute size, but need not tend to zero. To keep the electrically displaced particles in the shrinking laboratory, take ; then . Alternatively a stationary terrestrial laboratory has a free-fall time of order , giving . Both make precise the small spacetime-region limit. An extended, long-running experiment can still measure arbitrarily small tidal forces.
The weak equivalence principle says that freely falling test particles with the same initial data have composition-independent motion. In particular, a freely falling frame removes the common gravitational acceleration of both particles. The electric accelerations depend on charge and cannot be removed for charged and uncharged particles simultaneously by the same change of frame.
The Einstein equivalence principle extends the freely falling laboratory statement to all local nongravitational experiments: their outcomes obey special relativity, with local Lorentz invariance and local position invariance. The strong equivalence principle also includes local gravitational experiments and bodies with significant gravitational binding energy. It asserts universality of their free fall and independence of local experimental outcomes from the laboratory's location and velocity. The two-particle experiment illustrates the local distinction between gravity and a nongravitational force; by itself it does not establish this stronger claim about self-gravitating bodies.
In a metric theory, the common freely falling trajectories are timelike geodesics of a Lorentzian metric. Normal coordinates make and the Christoffel symbols zero at one point. Fermi normal coordinates do the same along a reference timelike geodesic. The residual effects are controlled by the Riemann curvature tensor through geodesic deviation, and enter the local metric at quadratic order in distance. Curvature is a physical tidal field, so no coordinate choice removes it over a finite region.
A relativistic theory should consequently couple matter universally to the metric tensor, recover nongravitational laws in local inertial frames and recover the Newtonian limit. General relativity implements this with the Einstein field equations; the contracted Bianchi identity is consistent with stress-energy conservation. The equivalence principle motivates this geometric description but does not alone uniquely determine the field equations. Extra gravitational fields may satisfy the Einstein equivalence principle for ordinary matter while failing the strong equivalence principle because local gravitational measurements or self-gravitating trajectories depend on those fields.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 63 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For the full unit-radius two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime, the coordinate ranges areOne can use with endpoints identified. If the identification is omitted, the same line element describes the universal covering spacetime instead. The periodicity follows from the hyperboloid embeddingThe induced ambient Minkowski metric is precisely the given Lorentzian metric.
Using an affine parameter , the geodesic Lagrangian is . The nonzero Christoffel symbols areThus the geodesic equations and their first integrals areHere for unit-speed timelike geodesics, for null geodesics and for unit-speed spacelike geodesics. The conserved is the geodesic conserved quantity from a Killing vector for the angular symmetry.
All geodesics of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime can be written especially simply in the embedding. If is the initial point and the initial tangent, with , , , the geodesic has normal ambient acceleration . ThereforeThese curves stay in the two-plane spanned by and , preserve both constraints and have no tangential acceleration. They consequently solve the geodesic equation and exhaust all initial directions.
An isometry can move the chosen point to , namely . For future-directed timelike geodesics take , obtainingThe continuous angular branch has , and every real gives a distinct timelike direction. The two null geodesics have andFor spacelike geodesics take , givingThey are closed with period in affine arclength and . In particular, is the equatorial geodesic . These three families, with reversals of parametrization allowed, are the requested complete set through the chosen point.
The conformal time substitution givesHenceMultiplying by gives the regular conformal cylinder of two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. Adding completes the conformal compactification; both boundary circles are spacelike. Null geodesics are straight lines through the origin. The other families have the useful diagram equationsThe image sketches representative directions from each family; the formulas allow all intermediate directions.
Geodesics through one point and observer horizons on the two-dimensional de Sitter conformal cylinder
. Details. For the complete observer , let be the shortest angular distance on the circle. Since light travels one unit of angular distance per unit conformal time, an event at can signal to the observer at some finite future time precisely whenEquality defines its future observer event horizon. Likewise an event can receive a signal emitted by the observer precisely whenand equality defines the past horizon. In the lift , their branches are and . The common communication region is the diamond , the observer's static patch of de Sitter spacetime. These are the observer horizons in two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. Every complete timelike observer has analogous horizons after a de Sitter isometry; they depend on the observer, rather than enclosing an intrinsic black-hole region.
Despite these horizons, each constant- circle is a Cauchy hypersurface of the full spacetime: any inextendible causal curve crosses it exactly once. The global spacetime is therefore globally hyperbolic and has no Cauchy horizons. The conformal boundaries lie at infinite proper time for complete timelike geodesics and infinite affine distance for complete null geodesics, so their finite height in the diagram is not a physical incompleteness.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 52 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The radial part of the Minkowski metric becomes , and . With , and the positive conformal factor , multiplication by givesConsequently the Minkowski conformal compactification isThe spatial metric is the round unit three-sphere. The extended unphysical metric is therefore that of the Einstein static universe, with unit spatial radius. Physical Minkowski spacetime occupies only the diamond-shaped causal patch of this cylinder, or a triangle after restricting to nonnegative spherical radius; it is not the whole cylinder.
The complete coordinate ranges and joint restrictions areThe polar angles have the usual coordinate degeneracies at their poles and at . In the extended Einstein static universe one may let and , but these are not the ranges of the original physical patch. In its interior . The line is the regular centre , not a component of infinity.
The conformal completion has future timelike infinity , past timelike infinity , and spacelike infinity . The open sloping boundaries arenamely future null infinity and past null infinity. Each ordinary interior point of the radial diagram represents a two-sphere, and each point on either open null boundary represents a two-sphere of null directions.
Minkowski Penrose triangle with timelike, spacelike and null infinities, the regular centre and representative causal and spacelike geodesics
. Details. A timelike geodesic is an inertial worldline with . As , both and tend to , giving and endpoint . At past infinity both tend to , giving . These endpoints are reached at infinite physical proper time, although at finite conformal coordinate time . A null geodesic has . In its outgoing future, approaches a finite retarded time while , giving an endpoint on ; in its incoming past, has a finite limit and , giving an endpoint on . A spacelike geodesic is a straight line with spatial tangent larger than its temporal tangent, so , at either end and both endpoints are in the compactified radial description. All these physical geodesics are complete. Only the unparametrized null geodesics are necessarily preserved as geodesics of the unphysical metric; timelike and spacelike images need not be its geodesics.
For horizons, distinguish a property of the spacetime from a property of an observer or of an initial-data hypersurface. Complete inertial observers have no particle horizon: in the flat cosmological slicing , the past light-travel distance is infinite. There is no finite-age initial singularity truncating communication between comoving observers. This statement does not say that an event receives signals from spacelike-separated events at the same time.
There is also no black-hole event horizon, because every event can send a future-directed null ray to future null infinity. Nevertheless accelerated timelike observers can have both future and past observer event horizons. For an entire observer worldline , define them by and , using its complete future and past respectively. An inertial observer's chronological past and future of the whole worldline are both all of Minkowski spacetime. By contrast, for the uniformly accelerated worldline in a Cartesian spatial direction,its null coordinates obey and . An event with can signal to a sufficiently late point of this worldline, whereas an event with cannot; finite transverse displacements do not change that conclusion as . Similarly the worldline can signal to precisely the events with . Thus its two observer event horizons areThey are the Rindler horizons, and their accessible common region is . They do not indicate a curvature singularity or a failure of global predictability.
Finally Minkowski spacetime is a globally hyperbolic spacetime: every inextendible causal curve crosses each complete spacelike plane exactly once. Indeed is strictly monotone along future-directed causal curves, and the speed bound prevents an inextendible curve from ending at finite by escaping to spatial infinity. Its time range is therefore all of . These planes are Cauchy hypersurfaces with full domain of dependence, so there are no Cauchy horizons associated with complete Cauchy data.
A Cauchy horizon is, however, defined relative to a specified initial surface. Under a literal existence reading of “admits”, non-Cauchy initial surfaces can have such horizons even in flat spacetime. For example the edgeless spacelike hyperboloid has . To see this, inside the future light cone and are positive and nondecreasing on future-directed causal curves. Their product increases past on every future-inextendible curve from below the hyperboloid; every past-inextendible curve from above it crosses down through before leaving the cone. Outside the cone there is an inextendible null curve avoiding the hyperboloid. The future light cone itself is its past Cauchy horizon. The time-reversed hyperboloid gives a future Cauchy horizon. This is the dependence of a Cauchy horizon on the initial hypersurface, not an intrinsic loss of predictability of full Minkowski spacetime. Thus a categorical claim that no choice of partial initial surface can ever have a Cauchy horizon would be too strong.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 1 36B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For an affine parameter, the geodesic equation isVary the energy action with endpoint-fixed variations. Its Euler-Lagrange equation isMultiplying by and symmetrizing the velocity indices determines the Levi-Civita connection:This determines the torsion-free metric connection; an antisymmetric-in- addition could not be detected by the geodesic energy variation alone.
For the displayed metric on , the nonzero coefficients are and . ConsequentlyFor a timelike curve choose proper time so . The first equation integrates to , and then . If , dividing and integrating givesThe timelike condition is , with the appropriate branch in the coordinate patch. Conversely these curves with that condition obey the first integrals and admit a timelike affine parametrization.
There is an omitted family in the printed claim: if , then is a timelike vertical geodesic, with in proper time. No fixed finite can represent all points of such a vertical curve by the displayed quadratic. The quadratic therefore describes the nonvertical timelike geodesics; the vertical family must be included for completeness.
Together the two families describe the timelike geodesics of an inverse-time conformal metric.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 56 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Describe the geodesic variation by a smooth map , with each curve a timelike geodesic parametrized by proper time. Its tangent vector is and its deviation vector is . Thus measures the first-order separation of neighboring members at the same value of proper time.
Mixed coordinate derivatives on the parameter surface commute. Consequently, along the variation,For an embedded two-dimensional variation this is the usual Lie bracket of vector fields on its image; more generally the same identity is read along the map using its commuting parameter derivatives. Since the Levi-Civita connection is torsion-free, it follows that .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 56 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For every member of the geodesic variation, proper time normalization gives . By metric compatibility, the geodesic equation, and ,The last equality uses normalization across the whole variation, not merely constancy along one curve. Hence is constant along each timelike geodesic, provingThis is orthogonality of proper-time deviation vectors.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 56 2 f Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Differentiate twice, use geodesic deviation, and eliminate with the conserved :The most informative way to interpret this linear differential equation is to express in a parallel-propagated orthonormal frame along the timelike geodesic. Its three spatial components satisfy .
If , put . With constant spatial vectors in that frame,Thus generic deviations grow in length like , and their squared separation grows like . Initially comoving neighbors, , have and exhibit this growth. The unqualified printed assertion is too strong: the nonzero Jacobi field has and shrinks exponentially. Such a Jacobi field is realizable by varying initial position and initial unit timelike velocity, with initial relative velocity .
If , put . ThenThe deviations are bounded and oscillatory, rather than exponentially growing. The squared separation is periodic with period or is constant. Initially comoving neighbors have and focus at ; arbitrary vector initial data need not focus together. For completeness, gives and . These conclusions concern infinitesimal geodesic deviation on the domain of the variation, not arbitrarily large finite separations.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 56 4 a ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let be the tangent vector to a geodesic with affine parameter . Its geodesic equation is . For a Killing vector field , metric compatibility givesThusThis geodesic conserved quantity from a Killing vector is independent of whether the geodesic is timelike, spacelike or null. For a timelike geodesic one can use proper time; for a null geodesic choose an affine parameter. An arbitrary nonaffine tangent rescales the displayed quantity and need not make it constant.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 ii Paper 2 34D a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
Let and parametrize the timelike geodesic by proper time . Time-translation and rotational symmetry conserve and in the equatorial plane. The normalized four-velocity obeysSubstitution and multiplication by give , orThe dot denotes a proper-time derivative, and are energy and angular momentum per unit rest mass.







